Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Enhancement of Rydberg Blockade via Microwave Dressing

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Resonant microwave dressing of rubidium Rydberg states, which mixes S and P levels, strengthens pair interactions, enlarges the blockade radius, and cuts the photon-pair correlation g(2)(0) at n=88 and n=112.

desk verdict A careful experimental demonstration that microwave dressing enhances Rydberg blockade in an ensemble source, with a no-free-parameter model that mostly holds up; the main open question is a retrieval-filtering mechanism the authors themselves flag. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08236 v2 pith:6Y22ICYY submitted 2024-11-12 physics.atom-ph quant-ph

Deniz Kurdak , Patrick R. Banner , Yaxin Li , Sean R. Muleady , Alexey V. Gorshkov , S. L. Rolston , J. V. Porto This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords Rydbergblockademicrowavedressingsingle-photonsourcephotonstatisticsdipole-dipoleinteractionFloquetpotentialspseudo-atommodelrubidium-87ensemble
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that resonant microwave dressing of rubidium-87 Rydberg states, turning the bare $|s\rangle$ level into $|-\rangle = (|s\rangle - |p\rangle)/\sqrt{2}$, converts the weak van der Waals interaction into a stronger first-order dipole-dipole interaction and thereby enlarges the Rydberg blockade radius. The experiment measures the statistics of light retrieved from a cold atomic ensemble acting as a single-photon source, finding that dressing suppresses the photon-pair correlation $g^{(2)}(0)$ at both $n=88$ and $n=112$: at similar cloud sizes, $g^{(2)}(0)$ drops from $0.82(1)$ to $0.34(1)$ and from $0.29(2)$ to $0.04(2)$, and stays below $0.1$ for cloud RMS radii up to about $30\,\mu\mathrm{m}$. A parameter-free model that combines Floquet-calculated pair potentials with Monte Carlo sampling of the measured density reproduces the cloud-length dependence of $g^{(2)}(0)$. If the claim holds, microwave dressing gives an ensemble-based single-photon source higher purity without the efficiency ceiling imposed by dephasing-based filtering, and offers a tunable knob for engineering Rydberg interactions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the microwave-dressed pair state $|--\rangle$, whose first-order dipole-dipole energy $\langle--|\hat{V}_{\mathrm{dd}}|--\rangle = \frac{1}{4}[\langle sp|\hat{V}_{\mathrm{dd}}|ps\rangle + \langle ss|\hat{V}_{\mathrm{dd}}|pp\rangle + \mathrm{H.c.}]$ turns the interaction from $1/r^6$ to $1/r^3$ behavior. Because the microwave Rabi frequency and the interaction strength near the blockade radius are comparable, the potentials are computed nonperturbatively with the Floquet formalism; fits of the resulting curves give the $C_3$ and $C_6$ coefficients used in the many-body simulation. The simulation is a 1D pseudo-atom model in which the cloud is divided into bins small compared with the blockade radius and each bin becomes one pseudo-spin, with dynamics truncated to at most three simultaneous excitations and atom positions sampled by Monte Carlo from the measured density profile. This chain connects the dressed pair potential to the predicted $g^{(2)}(0)$.

What would settle it

Measure the retrieval efficiency of a prepared two-excitation spin wave relative to a single-excitation spin wave in the same cloud; if two-excitation retrieval is suppressed by more than the square of the single-excitation retrieval probability, the beamsplitter assumption fails and part of the dressed purity gain would come from retrieval filtering instead of an enlarged blockade radius.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

When a resonant microwave couples the $nS_{1/2}$ and $nP_{3/2}$ Rydberg levels of $^{87}\mathrm{Rb}$, the lower dressed eigenstate $|-\rangle = (|s\rangle - |p\rangle)/\sqrt{2}$ carries a transition dipole, so two atoms in this state feel a first-order dipole-dipole potential $\sim C_3/r^3$ in addition to the bare $C_6/r^6$ van der Waals tail. The stronger, longer-range interaction increases the blockade radius $r_b$, defined by $|V(r_b)| = \Omega_{\mathrm{Ry}}$, which suppresses double excitations and lowers the $g^{(2)}(0)$ of the retrieved light. The paper shows this directly by comparing bare and dressed clouds of matched size, and corroborates the mechanism by reproducing the measured $g^{(2)}(0)$ versus cloud length with a no-free-parameter simulation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that retrieving the stored spin wave leaves the shape of the light statistics untouched, acting only as a beamsplitter that attenuates single- and multi-excitation components equally, and that spatial differences in retrieval efficiency cannot be what lowers the dressed $g^{(2)}(0)$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, dressing can lower $g^{(2)}(0)$ by roughly a factor of 2.4 at $n=88$ and a factor of 7 at $n=112$ for clouds of the same size, so an ensemble source can produce more nearly single photons without shrinking its collection region.
  • Dressed $n=88$ interactions become comparable to bare $n=112$ interactions, despite the roughly 16-fold difference in bare van der Waals strength, so dressing could let sources operate at lower principal quantum numbers.
  • Because the mechanism is blockade rather than interaction-induced dephasing, the purity gain does not carry the $1/e$ efficiency limit that filtering-based sources face.
  • The no-free-parameter match between Floquet potentials and measured $g^{(2)}(0)$ across cloud lengths implies the same simulation chain can be used to predict the interaction enhancement for other Rydberg levels, microwave polarizations, and detunings.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the measured configurations, scanning the microwave detuning or polarization should produce a predictable, possibly sign-changing $C_3$ coefficient; near the magic angle where the first-order interaction crosses zero, a cloud shaped to emphasize that geometry could map the angular dependence of the dressed interaction directly.
  • A testable extension suggested by the model's structure is to use dressing to null or invert interactions at specific separations, letting the same apparatus engineer effective attractive, repulsive, or flat pair potentials and probe few-body Rydberg dynamics with more than two excitations.
  • The residual difference between simulation and experiment, which the paper attributes partly to retrieval efficiency varying with the spatial profile of multi-excitation spin waves, could be tested by comparing photon statistics after changing the cloud's optical depth, since the beamsplitter assumption should break more visibly at lower optical depth.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports experiments on a cold 87Rb ensemble in which microwave dressing of Rydberg states (admixture of nS1/2 and nP3/2) is used to enhance the effective atom-atom interaction. The authors measure the pulse-integrated second-order correlation function g(2)(0) of light retrieved from the ensemble after a write-hold-read sequence, at principal quantum numbers n=88 and n=112. At similar cloud sizes, dressing reduces g(2)(0) from 0.82(1) to 0.34(1) at n=88 and from 0.29(2) to 0.04(2) at n=112, and the cloud-length dependence shows that the dressed state maintains g(2)(0) below 0.1 for RMS radii up to ~30 um. A model combining Floquet pair potentials, Monte Carlo density sampling, and a pseudo-atom truncation to up to three excitations reproduces the data with no parameters fitted to g(2)(0). Control measurements and simulations are used to rule out a reduced two-photon Rabi frequency and hold-time dephasing as explanations. The paper concludes that microwave dressing significantly increases the Rydberg blockade radius.

Significance. If fully substantiated, the result demonstrates a versatile route to engineering Rydberg interactions in an ensemble, with implications for single-photon sources and quantum nonlinear optics. The direct g(2)(0) measurements at two principal quantum numbers, the Floquet calculation of pair potentials, and the independent calibration of the effective Rabi frequency are strengths; the model is not fitted to the reported correlation data. The work is within the journal's scope and likely to be of interest to the cold-atom and quantum-optics communities. The main caveat is that the inference of the blockade radius relies on an assumption about retrieval that the authors themselves identify as an unquantified potential bias.

major comments (2)
  1. [SM Sec. IV (Eq. S6)] The model's evaluation of g(2)(0) via Eq. S6 assumes that retrieval acts as a lossless beamsplitter, i.e., that the probability of retrieving two photons from a doubly excited spin wave equals p_r^2, where p_r is the single-excitation retrieval efficiency. The SM immediately acknowledges that multi-excitation components are pushed predominantly to the cloud edges by blockade, where local density and retrieval efficiency are lower, and that 'the spatial dependence of the wavefunctions may alter the g(2)(0) in ways that our model does not take into account.' This is load-bearing: dressing strengthens interactions, so the multi-excitation components are pushed even further to the edges, and a position-dependent retrieval efficiency would preferentially suppress two-photon events in the dressed case without any increase in the true blockade radius. The alternative-mechanism checks in SM Sec. V (Fig. S6 for the reduced Rabi frequency and Fig. S7 for zero hold time) do not close this gap because both simulations use the same Eq. S6 retrieval model. The model's slight overestimate of g(2)(0) in Fig. 2c,d is in the direction that retrieval filtering would produce, so the discrepancy does not disfavor the alternative. The authors should quantify the variation of retrieval efficiency with excitation number and position (e.g., by computing the mode overlap of singly and doubly excited spin waves) or perform a control measurement that varies the optical depth while observing the dressing-induced suppression of g(2)(0). If such a bound cannot be provided, the abstract and conclusion should be tempered to state that the data are consistent with enhanced blockade under the stated retrieval assumption.
  2. [SM Sec. V, last paragraph] The SM states that for large cloud sizes with the bare n=88 state, 'it becomes necessary to examine the effect of more excitations in the cloud than we include in our calculations.' The main text and Fig. 2c,d describe the model as being in good agreement with the experimental results across all datasets. If the k=3 truncation is not converged for the high-g(2)(0) bare n=88 points (where g(2)(0) reaches ~0.8), the model comparison in that regime is not demonstrative. The authors should either show convergence to k=4 for those specific datasets (they report such a check elsewhere in the SM) or explicitly restrict the 'good agreement' claim to the parameter range where k=3 is converged. This is not the central claim of the paper, but it is relevant to the model's quantitative reach.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] The reference list contains duplicated numbers: [3] appears for both Fan et al. (RF sensing) and Ravets et al. (dipole-dipole coupling), and [10] appears for both Glaetzle et al. and Xu et al. Please renumber all citations.
  2. [Main text, Theoretical model] The phrase 'results of our model with no free parameters' should be qualified; SM Sec. IV explains that Omega_eff,mu is chosen to match independently measured Rabi flops, and zbin and k are numerical parameters. Suggest 'no free parameters fitted to the measured g(2)(0)'.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] Please state explicitly that the coincidence bars are normalized to the total number of pulses and are background-subtracted, as described in the text, so the caption is self-contained.
  4. [SM Sec. IV] The term 'spaghetti region' is used without definition; please replace with a standard term such as 'short-distance region' or define it.
  5. [Introduction] The citation clusters in the text (e.g., [3,10,26,33–36,38–42]) will become clear after fixing the duplicated reference numbers, but please verify that all citations point to the intended works.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: the model's predictions are not fitted to the measured g(2)(0), and the acknowledged retrieval-as-beamsplitter assumption is a limitation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The pair-interaction potentials are computed by independent Floquet diagonalization (SM Sec. III), with C3 and C6 coefficients obtained by fitting those calculated Floquet energies, not by fitting the measured g(2)(0) data. The only calibrated parameter is the effective two-photon Rabi frequency, which the SM states was chosen so that 'the simulated excitation dynamics were consistent with the experimentally observed Rabi flops' (SM Sec. IV); this is an independent observable, not the g(2)(0) being predicted. Atomic density profiles are experimental inputs. The pseudo-atom and few-polariton truncations are convergence-checked within the paper. Self-citations [21,52,54] provide apparatus, detection, and prior ensemble-system methods; they do not carry the central blockade claim, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. The SM Sec. IV passage about retrieval is a genuine disclosed limitation: the model assumes retrieval can be modeled by a beamsplitter that 'does not affect the pulse-integrated g(2)(0),' and it explicitly acknowledges that edge-localized multi-excitations may make the spatial dependence of spin waves alter g(2)(0). This is a possible confounding mechanism, not a circular step, because the predicted g(2)(0) is computed from the stored spin-wave state and then compared with data; if the beamsplitter assumption failed, the comparison would be invalidated rather than tautologically confirmed. The phrase 'no free parameters' is mildly overstated because Omega_eff is calibrated, but that calibration is to an independent Rabi-flopping observable, so the central g(2)(0) prediction is not forced by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's model is largely self-contained: Floquet pair potentials come from theory, and density profiles come from absorption imaging. The main assumptions are the quasi-1D geometry, the pseudo-atom binning with perfect intra-bin blockade, the truncation to three excitations, and a retrieval model that acts as a lossless beamsplitter for g(2)(0). No invented entities are introduced. The only calibrated quantity is Omega_eff,mu, matched to independent Rabi-flop data; the C3/C6 coefficients are fits to Floquet energies, not to the measured photon statistics.

free parameters (3)
  • zbin (pseudo-atom bin size) = 5 µm
    Numerical discretization chosen for convergence; not fitted to g(2)(0). Tested up to 10 µm (SM Sec. IV).
  • k (max simultaneous excitations in truncated Hilbert space) = 3
    Truncation order chosen for convergence, checked against k=4 (SM Sec. IV).
  • Omega_eff,mu (effective two-photon Rabi frequency) = chosen to match observed Rabi flops
    Calibrated to independent Rabi oscillation measurements, disclosed in SM Sec. IV; not fitted to the g(2)(0) outcome.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Floquet theorem applies to the two-atom Hamiltonian with a resonant microwave drive.
    Used in SM Sec. III to compute dressed pair potentials; legitimate for time-periodic Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption The ensemble is effectively quasi-1D, so angular dependence of the dressed interaction can be neglected.
    Stated in main text: probe width 3.3 µm much narrower than blockade radii; pair orientations mostly along quantization axis. Ratios of pairs added/removed 6-30 support this (SM Sec. III).
  • domain assumption Perfect blockade within a pseudo-atom bin.
    Central approximation of the pseudo-atom model (SM Sec. IV), valid if zbin is small compared to the blockade radius.
  • domain assumption Retrieval acts as a beamsplitter and does not change pulse-integrated g(2)(0).
    Stated in SM Sec. IV; explicitly acknowledged as an approximation that could fail due to spatial dependence of retrieval efficiency.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhancement of Rydberg Blockade via Microwave Dressing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6Y22ICYY

@misc{pith2026241108236,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhancement of Rydberg Blockade via Microwave Dressing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6Y22ICYY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08236}
}
read the original abstract

Experimental control over the strength and angular dependence of interactions between atoms is a key capability for advancing quantum technologies. Here, we use microwave dressing to manipulate and enhance Rydberg-Rydberg interactions in an atomic ensemble. By varying the cloud length relative to the blockade radius and measuring the statistics of the light retrieved from the ensemble, we demonstrate a clear enhancement of the interaction strength due to microwave dressing. These results are successfully captured by a theoretical model that accounts for the excitation dynamics, atomic density distribution, and the phase-matched retrieval efficiency. Our approach offers a versatile platform for further engineering interactions by exploiting additional features of the microwave fields, such as polarization and detuning, opening pathways for new quantum control strategies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08236 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Experimental setup: Two in-vacuum lenses focus counter-propagating probe (red) and control (blue) beams onto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a,b), where, for similar sized clouds (∼ 27 µm) at n = 88 and n = 112, dressing reduced the g (2)(0) from 0.82(1) to 0.34(1) and from 0.29(2) to 0.04(2), respec￾tively. The number of atom pairs separated by distances greater than the blockade radius rb is modified by vary￾ing the length of the cloud (see SM [48]) to characterize the differences between the bare- and dressed-state in￾teractions. We show the results … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Calculated interaction potentials for bare (blue) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. High-Fidelity Microwave-Polarization Control in a Rydberg-Ensemble Experiment

    physics.atom-ph 2025-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A chamber-matrix calibration using spin-resolved Rydberg-EIT spectroscopy lets the authors synthesize σ−, π, and σ+ microwave polarizations with >99% fidelity in a reflective chamber, extended off-resonance by two-pho...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Quantum information with Rydberg atoms

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Quantum information with Rydberg atoms, Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 2313 (2010), 0909.4777

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nature Physics 16, 132 (2020), 2002.07413

    arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    H. Fan, S. Kumar, J. Sedlacek, H. Kübler, S. Karimkashi, and J. P. Shaffer, Atom based RF electric field sensing, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 48, 202001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Nonlinear quantum optics mediated by Rydberg interactions

    O. Firstenberg, C. S. Adams, and S. Hofferberth, Non- linear quantum optics mediated by Rydberg interactions, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 49, 152003 (2016), 1602.06117

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    T. F. Gallagher,Rydberg Atoms (Cambridge University Press, 1994)

    work page 1994

  6. [6]

    Jaksch, J

    D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Côté, and M. D. Lukin, Fast Quantum Gates for Neutral Atoms, Physical Review Letters85, 2208 (2000), quant- ph/0004038

    arXiv 2000

  7. [7]

    M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, R. Cote, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Dipole Blockade and Quantum Information Processing in Mesoscopic Atomic Ensembles, Physical Review Letters87, 037901 (2000), quant-ph/0011028

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  8. [8]

    Analysis of a quantum logic device based on dipole-dipole interactions of optically trapped Rydberg atoms

    M. Saffman and T. G. Walker, Analysis of a quantum logic device based on dipole-dipole interactions of op- tically trapped Rydberg atoms, Physical Review A72, 022347 (2005), quant-ph/0502051

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Levine, A

    H. Levine, A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, High-Fidelity Control and Entanglement of Rydberg-Atom Qubits, Physical Review Letters 121, 123603 (2018), 1806.04682

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    A. W. Glaetzle, M. Dalmonte, R. Nath, C. Gross, I. Bloch, and P. Zoller, Designing Frustrated Quantum Magnets with Laser-Dressed Rydberg Atoms, Physical Review Letters 114, 173002 (2015), 1410.3388. 6

    2015 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Barredo, H

    D. Barredo, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, and C. S. Adams, Coherent Excitation Transfer in a Spin Chain of Three Rydberg Atoms, Phys- ical Review Letters114, 113002 (2015), 1408.1055

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Hollerith, K

    S. Hollerith, K. Srakaew, D. Wei, A. Rubio-Abadal, D. Adler, P. Weckesser, A. Kruckenhauser, V. Walther, R. v. Bijnen, J. Rui, C. Gross, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Realizing Distance-Selective Interactions in a Rydberg- Dressed Atom Array, Physical Review Letters 128, 113602 (20...

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Scholl, H

    P. Scholl, H. J. Williams, G. Bornet, F. Wallner, D. Barredo, L. Henriet, A. Signoles, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, S. Geier, A. Tebben, A. Salzinger, G. Zürn, T. Lahaye, M. Weidemüller, and A. Browaeys, Microwave Engineering of Programmable XXZ Hamiltonians in Ar- rays of Rydberg At...

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Steinert, P

    L.-M. Steinert, P. Osterholz, R. Eberhard, L. Festa, N. Lorenz, Z. Chen, A. Trautmann, and C. Gross, Spa- tially Tunable Spin Interactions in Neutral Atom Arrays, Physical Review Letters130, 243001 (2023), 2206.12385

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Signoles, T

    A. Signoles, T. Franz, R. F. Alves, M. Gärttner, S. Whit- lock, G. Zürn, and M. Weidemüller, Glassy Dynamics in a Disordered Heisenberg Quantum Spin System, Physical Review X 11, 011011 (2021), 1909.11959

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Zeiher, R

    J. Zeiher, R. v. Bijnen, P. Schauß, S. Hild, J.-y. Choi, T. Pohl, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Many-body interferome- try of a Rydberg-dressed spin lattice, Nature Physics12, 1095 (2016), 1602.06313

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Schleier-Smith, Transverse-Field Ising Dynamics in a Rydberg-Dressed Atomic Gas, Physical Review Letters 124, 063601 (2020), 1910.13687

    V.Borish, O.Marković, J.A.Hines, S.V.Rajagopal,and M. Schleier-Smith, Transverse-Field Ising Dynamics in a Rydberg-Dressed Atomic Gas, Physical Review Letters 124, 063601 (2020), 1910.13687

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Geier, N

    S. Geier, N. Thaicharoen, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, A. Salzinger, A. Tebben, D. Grimshandl, G. Zürn, and M. Weidemüller, Floquet Hamiltonian engineering of an isolated many-body spin system, Science 374, 1149 (2021), 2105.01597

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Peyronel, O

    T. Peyronel, O. Firstenberg, Q.-Y. Liang, S. Hofferberth, A. V. Gorshkov, T. Pohl, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuletić, Quantum nonlinear optics with single photons enabled by strongly interacting atoms, Nature488, 57 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    S. K. Kanungo, J. D. Whalen, Y. Lu, M. Yuan, S. Das- gupta, F. B. Dunning, K. R. A. Hazzard, and T. C. Killian, Realizing topological edge states with Rydberg- atom synthetic dimensions, Nature Communications13, 972 (2022), 2101.02871

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    D. P. Ornelas-Huerta, A. N. Craddock, E. A. Gold- schmidt, A. J. Hachtel, Y. Wang, P. Bienias, A. V. Gorshkov, S. L. Rolston, and J. V. Porto, On-demand indistinguishable single photons from an efficient and pure source based on a Rydberg ensemble, Optica7, 813 (2020), 2003.02202

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    C.-W. Yang, J. Li, M.-T. Zhou, X. Jiang, X.-H. Bao, and J.-W. Pan, Deterministic measurement of a Ryd- berg superatom qubit via cavity-enhanced single-photon emission, Optica 9, 853 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    S. Shi, B. Xu, K. Zhang, G.-S. Ye, D.-S. Xiang, Y. Liu, J. Wang, D. Su, and L. Li, High-fidelity photonic quan- tum logic gate based on near-optimal Rydberg single- photon source, Nature Communications13, 4454 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    G.-S. Ye, B. Xu, Y. Chang, S. Shi, T. Shi, and L. Li, A photonicentanglementfilterwithRydbergatoms,Nature Photonics 17, 538 (2023), 2209.03107

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Tiarks, S

    D. Tiarks, S. Schmidt-Eberle, T. Stolz, G. Rempe, and S. Dürr, A photon–photon quantum gate based on Rydberg interactions, Nature Physics 15, 124 (2019), 1807.05795

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Tiarks, S

    D. Tiarks, S. Baur, K. Schneider, S. Dürr, and G. Rempe, Single-Photon Transistor Using a Förster Resonance, Physical Review Letters113, 053602 (2014), 1404.3061

    2014 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Gorniaczyk, C

    H. Gorniaczyk, C. Tresp, J. Schmidt, H. Fedder, and S. Hofferberth, Single-Photon Transistor Mediated by In- terstate Rydberg Interactions, Physical Review Letters 113, 053601 (2014), 1404.2876

    2014 arXiv

  20. [28]

    A. V. Gorshkov, J. Otterbach, M. Fleischhauer, T. Pohl, and M. D. Lukin, Photon-Photon Interactions via Ry- dberg Blockade, Physical Review Letters 107, 133602 (2011), 1103.3700

    2011 arXiv

  21. [29]

    T. Graß, P. Bienias, M. J. Gullans, R. Lundgren, J. Ma- ciejko, and A. V. Gorshkov, Fractional Quantum Hall Phases of Bosons with Tunable Interactions: From the Laughlin Liquid to a Fractional Wigner Crystal, Physi- cal Review Letters121, 253403 (2018), 1809.04493

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    M. J. Gullans, S. Diehl, S. T. Rittenhouse, B. P. Ruzic, J. P. D’Incao, P. Julienne, A. V. Gorshkov, and J. M. Taylor, Efimov States of Strongly Interacting Photons, Physical Review Letters119, 233601 (2017), 1709.01955

    2017 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Paredes-Barato and C

    D. Paredes-Barato and C. S. Adams, All-Optical Quan- tum Information Processing Using Rydberg Gates, Phys- ical Review Letters112, 040501 (2013), 1309.7933

    2013 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. D. Thompson, T. L. Nicholson, Q.-Y. Liang, S. H. Cantu, A. V. Venkatramani, S. Choi, I. A. Fedorov, D. Viscor, T. Pohl, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuletić, Symmetry-protected collisions between strongly interact- ing photons, Nature542, 206 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    T. G. Walker and M. Saffman, Consequences of Zee- man degeneracy for the van der Waals blockade between Rydberg atoms, Physical Review A 77, 032723 (2008), 0712.3438

    2008 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Bohlouli-Zanjani, J

    P. Bohlouli-Zanjani, J. A. Petrus, and J. D. D. Martin, Enhancement of Rydberg Atom Interactions Using ac Stark Shifts, Physical Review Letters98, 203005 (2007), physics/0612233

    2007 arXiv

  27. [35]

    D. B. Tretyakov, V. M. Entin, E. A. Yakshina, I. I. Beterov, C. Andreeva, and I. I. Ryabtsev, Controlling the interactions of a few cold Rb Rydberg atoms by radio- frequency-assisted Förster resonances, Physical Review A 90, 041403 (2014), 1404.0438

    2014 arXiv

  28. [36]

    I. I. Ryabtsev, D. B. Tretyakov, I. I. Beterov, and V. M. Entin, Observation of the Stark-Tuned Förster Reso- nance between Two Rydberg Atoms, Physical Review Letters 104, 073003 (2010), 0909.3239

    2010 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Ravets, H

    S. Ravets, H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, L. Béguin, T. La- haye, and A. Browaeys, Coherent dipole–dipole coupling between two single Rydberg atoms at an electrically- tuned Förster resonance, Nature Physics10, 914 (2014), 1405.7804

    2014 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Reinhard, K

    A. Reinhard, K. C. Younge, and G. Raithel, Effect of Förster resonances on the excitation statistics of many- body Rydberg systems, Physical Review A 78, 060702 (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    Nipper, J

    J. Nipper, J. B. Balewski, A. T. Krupp, S. Hofferberth, R. Löw, and T. Pfau, Atomic Pair-State Interferome- ter: Controlling and Measuring an Interaction-Induced Phase Shift in Rydberg-Atom Pairs, Physical Review X 2, 031011 (2012)

    2012

  32. [40]

    Gorniaczyk, C

    H. Gorniaczyk, C. Tresp, P. Bienias, A. Paris-Mandoki, 7 W. Li, I. Mirgorodskiy, H. P. Büchler, I. Lesanovsky, and S. Hofferberth, Enhancement of Rydberg-mediated single-photon nonlinearities by electrically tuned Förster resonances, Nature Communications 7, 12480 (2016), 1511.09445

    2016 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Tanasittikosol, J

    M. Tanasittikosol, J. D. Pritchard, D. Maxwell, A. Gau- guet, K. J. Weatherill, R. M. Potvliege, and C. S. Adams, Microwave dressing of Rydberg dark states, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics44, 184020 (2011), 1102.0226

    2011 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Brekke, J

    E. Brekke, J. O. Day, and T. G. Walker, Excitation sup- pression due to interactions between microwave-dressed Rydberg atoms, Physical Review A 86, 033406 (2012), 1207.3006

    2012 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Xu, G.-S

    B. Xu, G.-S. Ye, Y. Chang, T. Shi, and L. Li, Con- tinuously tunable single-photon level nonlinearity with Rydberg state wave-function engineering, Reports on Progress in Physics87, 110502 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    J. T. Young, P. Bienias, R. Belyansky, A. M. Kaufman, and A. V. Gorshkov, Asymmetric Blockade and Multi- qubit Gates via Dipole-Dipole Interactions, Physical Re- view Letters 127, 120501 (2021), 2006.02486

    2021 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Shi and T

    X.-F. Shi and T. A. B. Kennedy, Annulled van der Waals interaction and fast Rydberg quantum gates, Physical Review A 95, 043429 (2017), 1606.08516

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    X.-F. Shi, P. Svetlichnyy, and T. A. B. Kennedy, Spin–charge separation of dark-state polaritons in a Ry- dberg medium, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 074005 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Sevinçli and T

    S. Sevinçli and T. Pohl, Microwave control of Rydberg atom interactions, New Journal of Physics 16, 123036 (2014), 1412.4925

    2014 arXiv

  40. [48]

    See Supplemental Material for more information on the cloudshapingandmicrowavepurificationtechniques, fur- ther results from the Floquet simulations, details of the theory model, and the investigation of alternative mech- anisms for the reduction ofg(2)(0)

  41. [49]

    J. Fan, H. Zhang, Y. Jiao, C. Li, J. Bai, J. Wu, J. Zhao, and S. Jia, Manipulation of single stored-photon with mi- crowavefieldbasedonRydbergpolariton,OpticsExpress 31, 20641 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Lampen, H

    J. Lampen, H. Nguyen, L. Li, P. R. Berman, and A. Kuzmich, Long-lived coherence between ground and Rydberg levels in a magic-wavelength lattice, Physical Review A 98, 033411 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    S. Rosi, A. Burchianti, S. Conclave, D. S. Naik, G. Roati, C.Fort,andF.Minardi, Λ-enhancedgreymolassesonthe D2 transition of Rubidium-87 atoms, Scientific Reports 8, 1301 (2018), 1709.06467

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    E. A. Goldschmidt, T. Boulier, R. C. Brown, S. B. Koller, J. T. Young, A. V. Gorshkov, S. L. Rolston, and J. V. Porto, Anomalous Broadening in Driven Dissipative Ry- dberg Systems, Physical Review Letters 116, 113001 (2016), 1510.08710

    2016 arXiv

  45. [53]

    M. J. Stevens, Chapter 2 - photon statistics, measure- ments, and measurements tools, in Single-Photon Gen- eration and Detection , Experimental Methods in the Physical Sciences, Vol. 45, edited by A. Migdall, S. V. Polyakov, J. Fan, and J. C. Bienfang (Academic Press,

  46. [54]

    Banner, D

    P. Banner, D. Kurdak, Y. Li, A. Migdall, J. Porto, and S. Rolston, Number-State Reconstruction with a Sin- gle Single-Photon Avalanche Detector, Optica Quantum 10.1364/opticaq.504308 (2024)

    2024 doi

  47. [55]

    Reinhard, T

    A. Reinhard, T. C. Liebisch, B. Knuffman, and G. Raithel, Level shifts of rubidium Rydberg states due to binary interactions, Physical Review A 75, 032712 (2007)

    2007

  48. [56]

    P. R. Berman and A. Kuzmich, Interplay of the dipole blockade and interaction-induced dephasing in Rydberg single-photon sources, Physical Review A 109, 013710 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Bariani, P

    F. Bariani, P. M. Goldbart, and T. A. B. Kennedy, De- phasing dynamics of Rydberg atom spin waves, Physical Review A 86, 041802 (2012), 1208.0355. 1 Supplemental material for Enhancement of Rydberg Blockade via Microwave Dressing Deniz Kurdak ,1 Patrick R. Banner ,1 Yaxin Li ,...

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    few-polariton

    As the optical two-photon drive only couples to thes state, the effective single-atom Rabi frequency in this case isΩeff,±(r) = Ωc(r)Ωp(r)/(2 √ 2∆). We thus model the two-photon drive via the following Hamiltonian: ˆHdrive,µ = X i ¯hΩeff,µ(ri) 2 (|µ⟩i⟨g|i + |g⟩i⟨µ|i) , (S4) wh...

  51. [59]

    To explore the impact of Ωc on single-photon purity, we reduce the control power and measure the corresponding reduction in g(2)(0) shown in Fig. S6. Comparing the g(2)(0) of the light produced using bare and dressed states at the same Rabi frequency excludes dressing-induced ...

  52. [60]

    pairs whose interaction energy is either smaller than or comparable to this energy scale

    The error bars, smaller than the markers used, indicate the±σ statistical uncertainties. pairs whose interaction energy is either smaller than or comparable to this energy scale. As the total write time is ∼ 1µs, we expect that interaction-induced dephasing will only occur ove...

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.