Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

On the foundations of statistical mechanics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that statistical mechanics works because, with many degrees of freedom, the equilibrium macrostate occupies almost the entire energy shell—so most microstates are thermal regardless of chaos or ergodicity.

desk verdict A self-described, competent review of the Boltzmannian/typicality program; the central 'thermal equilibrium dominance' principle is asserted more broadly than the paper's own examples support, but it is an honest and useful synthesis. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08709 v2 pith:SWSBCYB2 submitted 2024-11-13 cond-mat.stat-mech

Marco Baldovin , Giacomo Gradenigo , Angelo Vulpiani , Nino Zanghì This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech MSC 82B0382B0582B1037A60 PACS 05.20.-y05.30.-d05.45.-a
keywords statisticalmechanicsfoundationsthermalequilibriumdominancetypicalityBoltzmannentropyergodicityquantummanydegreesoffreedommacrostate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Statistical mechanics does not need chaos, ergodicity, or mixing to be justified. The thesis is that what makes thermodynamics work is "thermal equilibrium dominance": for a system with many degrees of freedom, the set of microstates that look like thermal equilibrium occupies almost all of the energy shell, so an overwhelming majority of microstates are thermal. The same principle is carried from classical phase space to quantum Hilbert space, where the equilibrium subspace is shown to exhaust the microcanonical shell. If this is right, the Boltzmannian "individualist" picture—a single system in a single pure state that is typical of equilibrium—is the common foundation of classical and quantum statistical mechanics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the macrostate and its measure relative to the energy shell. In the classical case the measure is the phase-space volume $W_M$ of the macrostate, and the key identity is $W_{\mathrm{eq}}/W_E = 1-\epsilon$, which follows from Boltzmann's multinomial counting of occupation numbers in the dilute gas; in the quantum case it is the dimension $\Omega_M$ of the macrostate subspace, computed for fermions and bosons, with the equilibrium occupation numbers giving $\Omega_{\mathrm{eq}}/\Omega_E$ close to one. This dominance, not metric transitivity, is what makes equilibrium predictions robust and makes typicality meaningful.

What would settle it

Find a concrete finite-range interacting Hamiltonian, classical or quantum, where the microcanonical volume or dimension of the equilibrium macrostate is not exponentially close to the full energy shell as $N$ grows—for instance, a model where $W_{\mathrm{eq}}/W_E$ tends to a constant less than one—and the paper's central claim is falsified. In the quantum case, the analogous test is a many-body Hamiltonian whose equilibrium subspace dimension is not an overwhelming fraction of the microcanonical Hilbert-space dimension.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that Boltzmann's derivation of the Maxwell distribution already contains the whole foundation: in Eq. (17), $W_{\mathrm{eq}}/W_E = 1-\epsilon$ with $\epsilon$ exponentially small in $N$, meaning the equilibrium macrostate fills almost the entire energy shell. The paper elevates this property, which it names thermal equilibrium dominance, to the cornerstone of statistical mechanics, and extends it to quantum systems by counting dimensions: for Fermi and Bose gases the equilibrium subspace $\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{eq}}$ associated with the Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein occupation numbers dominates the microcanonical Hilbert space. From this perspective the role of dynamics is reduced: equilibration is not a matter of a trajectory exploring the shell, but of the fact that almost every microstate in the shell is already an equilibrium state, so time averages and ensemble averages agree because the observable is nearly constant on the shell.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes, rather than derives from first principles, that for realistic macroscopic systems the equilibrium macrostate truly occupies almost all of the energy shell (phase-space volume classically, Hilbert-space dimension quantum-mechanically); if that dominance failed, most microstates would not be thermal and the typicality argument would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Equilibrium statistical mechanics should work for integrable and non-chaotic systems, as long as the observable is macroscopic and the particle number is large.
  • Microscopic dynamics enter mainly through time scales and the choice of observables, not through whether the system is ergodic or mixing.
  • In quantum mechanics, an individual pure state can be in thermal equilibrium even when its density matrix differs from the canonical or microcanonical one; only the coarse-grained macrostate matters.
  • The justification of ensembles reduces to a law of large numbers on the energy shell, so large-deviation estimates can replace ergodic proofs.
  • Typicality of equilibrium explains why irreversibility is observed: out-of-equilibrium initial states are atypical, and most trajectories starting from them relax in the same way.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A practical diagnostic follows: for any proposed statistical-mechanics model, one can directly estimate the equilibrium-macrostate volume fraction at finite $N$; if it is not close to one, the ensemble description should fail even for long observation times, and the failure is a property of state space, not of dynamics.
  • The principle suggests that the hardest open problem is not proving ergodicity but proving measure concentration for realistic interacting Hamiltonians, making large-deviation theory and concentration of measure the natural tools.
  • In the quantum case, thermal equilibrium dominance plus entanglement may imply that typical pure states thermalize for essentially any Hamiltonian with a sufficiently large energy shell, so quantum chaos would be a sufficient but not necessary condition for thermalization.
  • For small or open systems, such as those in nanotechnology and biophysics, thermal equilibrium dominance gives a quantitative boundary: as the number of degrees of freedom drops, the equilibrium fraction shrinks or fluctuations grow, and the onset of non-thermal behavior should be predicted from macrostate counting rather than from Lyapunov exponents.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is an extensive review of the conceptual foundations of classical and quantum statistical mechanics. Its central thesis is that the validity of equilibrium statistical mechanics does not require chaos or ergodicity; rather, it follows from the large number of degrees of freedom together with 'thermal equilibrium dominance', the claim that the equilibrium macrostate occupies almost all of the energy shell (Eq. (17) classically, Sec. 5.2.1 quantum mechanically). The review covers Boltzmann's dilute-gas derivation, the ergodic hypothesis and the KAM/FPUT problem, Khinchin's and Mazur–van der Linden's results, irreversibility and typicality, and a Boltzmannian approach to quantum statistical mechanics including typicality, the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and entropy concepts.

Significance. If the central thesis were established in the claimed generality, the paper would provide a valuable unifying perspective, shifting the foundational emphasis from dynamical properties such as chaos to counting and measure. The review is largely accurate: the Khinchin inequality, the Boltzmann equation derivation, and many cited numerical and analytical results are correctly summarized, and the paper is fair in presenting counterexamples to the necessity of chaos. Its main value is as a synthesis and as a clear statement of a Boltzmannian/individualist viewpoint. However, as argued below, the 'cornerstone' principle is not proven for general interacting systems, and this limits the strength of the foundational claim rather than the review's usefulness as a survey.

major comments (3)
  1. [Secs. 1.1.2, 5.2.1, 5.2.5] Thermal equilibrium dominance is explicitly derived only for the dilute classical gas (Eqs. (11)-(17)) and the ideal quantum gas (Eqs. (120)-(122)). The text then promotes this property to 'the cornerstone of statistical mechanics' in Sec. 5.2.5 without supplying a general argument for interacting, finite-density systems. The paper itself flags the limits of the relevant machinery: Sec. 1.2.1 restricts microcanonical-to-canonical equivalence to short-range interactions, and Sec. 3.4 recalls that the Mazur–van der Linden theorem fails at phase transitions. For long-range interacting systems and at first-order transitions, ensemble equivalence can break down and no single equilibrium macrostate need dominate the energy shell. The central claim should therefore be explicitly restricted to short-range, single-phase macroscopic systems, or a general derivation of dominance should be provided.
  2. [Eq. (17) and Sec. 5.2.1] The ratio Weq/WE is not an intrinsic property of a Hamiltonian; it depends on the chosen macroscopic observables and coarse-graining that define the equilibrium macrostate. The review itself emphasizes the importance of choosing the right observables in Secs. 2.3-2.4 and 8.5, but the dominance principle is stated without this caveat. As written, a reader could infer that for a generic system 'most microstates are thermal' in an absolute sense, whereas the meaningful statement is relative to a physically selected set of macro-observables. The authors should state this qualification where the principle is introduced.
  3. [Sec. 5.2.1] The passage from dimension dominance (Eqs. (120)-(122)) to the assertion that most quantum pure states are in thermal equilibrium requires a measure on the unit sphere and concentration-of-measure results; the relevant tools (typicality, Gaussian adjusted projected measures, canonical typicality) are introduced only later, in Sec. 6.1. As written, the counting argument for ideal gases is presented as already establishing typicality of equilibrium for quantum pure states. The logical order should be clarified, or the statements from Sec. 6 should be invoked at that point.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (17)] The notation is inconsistent: the text uses WE and Omega_E for the volume of the energy shell, and the footnote refers to Omega_eq where Eq. (17) writes Weq. The symbols should be harmonized.
  2. [Sec. 5.2.1] The sentence 'the equality (16), encapsulating the notion of thermal equilibrium dominance' should refer to Eq. (17), not Eq. (16), which is the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption says 'The parameters of the system are the same as in Fig. 2' but it should refer to Fig. 1.
  4. [Sec. 3.6] The name Mazur–van der Linden is misspelled as 'Mazur and van der Lynden', and 'Kinchin' appears once instead of 'Khinchin'.
  5. [Throughout] There are scattered typos, including 'beahviour', 'observables', 'sistems', and 'micorscopic'; a careful copyedit is advisable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper derives thermal equilibrium dominance by explicit counting for ideal gases, and its self-citations are not load-bearing for the formal claims.

full rationale

The central derivation chain begins with Boltzmann's multinomial counting of microstates in Eq. (11), leading to the Boltzmann entropy formula (12). The equilibrium (Maxwellian) macrostate is found by maximizing this entropy under constraints (14)-(15), and Eq. (17) — Weq/WE = 1 − ε — is presented as the resulting large-deviation statement for the dilute gas. This is a genuine derivation from the microcanonical measure, not a definition of equilibrium as dominant. The quantum case in Sec. 5.2.1 repeats the same logic: the dimension of a macrostate is counted in Eq. (120) for Fermi and Bose statistics, the entropy is written in Eq. (121), and maximizing it yields the Fermi-Dirac/Bose-Einstein distributions (122); the dominance of the corresponding equilibrium subspace is then inferred from the same counting. No fitted parameter is later relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from prior work by the authors is invoked to force the choice of 'thermal equilibrium dominance.' The paper does rely on several published numerical and analytic results, including works by the authors (e.g. Refs. [64], [69], [17], [161]), to illustrate the message that chaos is not necessary for equilibrium; these are external, reproducible studies and are not used as a substitute for the formal derivation. The main weakness — that the dominance principle is proved only for ideal gases and then asserted as universal — is a scope/overreach concern, not a circularity. Accordingly, the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review rests on standard physical assumptions (Hamiltonian and unitary dynamics, large-N observables, uniform phase-space measures) and on the central postulate of thermal equilibrium dominance, which the paper elevates to a foundational principle but does not prove for generic systems. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Microscopic dynamics is Hamiltonian in the classical case and unitary via the Schrödinger equation in the quantum case.
    The whole review operates within this framework, stated in the introduction and used throughout, e.g., Eq. (2) and Eq. (94).
  • domain assumption Macroscopically relevant observables are averages over many degrees of freedom, including sum functions in the Khinchin sense.
    This assumption underlies the claim that typicality holds for physical observables, as discussed in Sec. 3.4 where sum functions are introduced.
  • domain assumption The relevant measure for 'most' microstates is the normalized volume (classical) or the uniform measure on the unit sphere (quantum).
    Thermal equilibrium dominance and typicality are defined with respect to these measures, as in Sec. 1.1.2 and Sec. 6.1.2.
  • ad hoc to paper For realistic macroscopic systems, the equilibrium macrostate occupies almost all of the energy shell: thermal equilibrium dominance.
    This is the paper's central principle, asserted in Sec. 5.2.0 and used to justify the use of ensembles. It is not derived for general systems, only illustrated on ideal gases.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the foundations of statistical mechanics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SWSBCYB2

@misc{pith2026241108709,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the foundations of statistical mechanics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SWSBCYB2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08709}
}
read the original abstract

Although not as wide, and popular, as that of quantum mechanics, the investigation of fundamental aspects of statistical mechanics constitutes an important research field in the building of modern physics. Besides the interest for itself, both for physicists and philosophers, and the obvious pedagogical motivations, there is a further, compelling reason for a thorough understanding of the subject. The fast development of models and methods at the edge of the established domain of the field requires indeed a deep reflection on the essential aspects of the theory, which are at the basis of its success. These elements should never be disregarded when trying to expand the domain of statistical mechanics to systems with novel, little known features. It is thus important to (re)consider in a careful way the main ingredients involved in the foundations of statistical mechanics. Among those, a primary role is covered by the dynamical aspects (e.g. presence of chaos), the emergence of collective features for large systems, and the use of probability in the building of a consistent statistical description of physical systems. With this goal in mind, in the present review we aim at providing a consistent picture of the state of the art of the subject, both in the classical and in the quantum realm. In particular, we will highlight the similarities of the key technical and conceptual steps with emphasis on the relevance of the many degrees of freedom, to justify the use of statistical ensembles in the two domains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08709 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. E1(t)/Etot, E2(t)/Etot, E3(t)/Etot for the FPUT system, with N = 32, r = 3, ϵ = 0.1 and energy density E = Etot/N = 0.07. The figure is a courtesy of G. Benettin. a non-equilibrium state (energy concentrated in only one mode) to the equipartition state predicted by SM. In the FPUT work a numerical simulation was performed with N = 16, 32, 64, ϵ , 0 and all the energy concentrated initially in the first normal mode. … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Time averaged fraction of energy, in modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. From Ref. [128], effective number of degrees of freedom ⟨neff⟩ as an indicator of amplitude sharing between light modes; notice the decay moving from right to left from an equipartited phase neff = 1 to an heterogeneous phase and the sharpening of the behaviour for increasing number of modes in the spectrum. the numerical investigations of [128] presented an attempt to establish a connection be￾tween, on the one han… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Time averaged fraction of energy, in all the modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic representation of the partition of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: For two values of N, typical trajectories of the macroscopic system, initially prepared in the macroscopic state nt = 0.9N. Absolute value [panels (a) and (b)] and relative distance from the average [panels (c) and (d)] are shown. The spreading of σ is also reported (l…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Irreversibility in the piston model. Black and red curves denote ensemble averaged and single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Irreversible spreading of an ink drop, as modeled by Eq (91). Left panel: evolution in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Evolution from close-to equilibrium initial conditions, (a) and (b), or for small systems (c), for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Constrained Symplectic Quantization I: the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A constrained complex-field 'symplectic quantization' dynamics is claimed to reproduce the Feynman path integral and is verified numerically on the quantum harmonic oscillator's real-time correlators, commutator, and ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

252 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R. Aaij, C. A. Beteta, B. Adeva, M. Adinolfi, C. Adrover, A. A ffolder, Z. Ajal- touni, J. Albrecht, F. Alessio, M. Alexander, et al. First observation of c p violation in the decays of b s 0 mesons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110(22):221601, 2013

    2013

  2. [2]

    R. Aaij, C. A. Beteta, B. Adeva, M. Adinolfi, C. A. Aidala, Z. Ajaltouni, S. Akar, P. Albicocco, J. Albrecht, F. Alessio, et al. Observation of c p violation in charm decays. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122(21):211803, 2019

    2019

  3. [3]

    K. Abe, R. Abe, I. Adachi, B. S. Ahn, H. Aihara, M. Akatsu, G. Alimonti, K. Asai, M. Asai, Y . Asano, et al. Observation of large cp violation in the neutral b meson system. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87(9):091802, 2001

    2001

  4. [4]

    Alba and P

    V . Alba and P. Calabrese. Entanglement and thermodynamics after a quantum quench in integrable systems. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 114(30):7947, 2017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703516114

    doi:10.1073/pnas.1703516114 2017

  5. [5]

    P. W. Anderson. Absence of di ffusion in certain random lattices. Phys. Rev., 109:1492–1505, 1958

    1958

  6. [6]

    Antenucci, A

    F. Antenucci, A. Crisanti, and L. Leuzzi. The glassy random laser: replica symmetry breaking in the intensity fluctuations of emission spectra. Sci. Rep., 5 (1):16792, 2015

    2015

  7. [7]

    L. Arkeryd. On the Boltzmann equation. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 45(1):1–16, Jan 1972. ISSN 1432-0673. doi: 10.1007 /BF00253392

    1972

  8. [8]

    Arkeryd, R

    L. Arkeryd, R. Esposito, and M. Pulvirenti. The boltzmann equation for weakly inhomogeneous data. Comm. Math. Phys., 111(3):393–407, Sept. 1987. ISSN 1432-0916. doi: 10.1007 /bf01238905. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ BF01238905

    1987

Show all 252 references
  1. [9]

    V . Arnold. Proof of a theorem of an kolmogorov on the preservation of condi- tionally periodic motions under a small perturbation of the hamiltonian, uspehi mat. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 18(5):113, 1963

    1963

  2. [10]

    V . I. Arnol’d. Instability of dynamical systems with many degrees of freedom. In Doklady Akademii Nauk, volume 156, pages 9–12. Russian Academy of Sci- ences, 1964

    1964

  3. [11]

    V . I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974

    1974

  4. [12]

    Aubert, D

    B. Aubert, D. Boutigny, I. De Bonis, J.-M. Gaillard, A. Jeremie, Y . Karyotakis, J. Lees, P. Robbe, V . Tisserand, A. Palano, et al. Measurement of cp-violating asymmetries in b 0 decays to cp eigenstates.Phys. Rev. Lett., 86(12):2515, 2001

    2001

  5. [13]

    N. Ayi. From newton’s law to the linear boltzmann equation without cut-o ff. Comm. Math. Phys., 350(3):1219–1274, Mar 2017. 130

    2017

  6. [14]

    Baldovin, L

    M. Baldovin, L. Caprini, and A. Vulpiani. Irreversibility and typicality: A sim- ple analytical result for the ehrenfest model. Physica A, 524:422–429, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    Baldovin, S

    M. Baldovin, S. Iubini, R. Livi, and A. Vulpiani. Statistical mechanics of sys- tems with negative temperature. Phys. Rep. , 923:1–50, 2021. ISSN 0370-

    2021

  8. [16]

    Baldovin, A

    M. Baldovin, A. Vulpiani, and G. Gradenigo. Statistical mechanics of an inte- grable system. J. Stat. Phys., 183(3):41, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Baldovin, R

    M. Baldovin, R. Marino, and A. Vulpiani. Ergodic observables in non-ergodic systems: the example of the harmonic chain. Physica A, 630:129273, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Baldovin, G

    M. Baldovin, G. Gradenigo, and A. Vulpiani. Statistical features of high- dimensional hamiltonian systems. In C. Hidalgo, editor,EPS Grand Challenges: Physics for Society in the Horizon 2050. IOP Publishing, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Barnum, C

    H. Barnum, C. M. Caves, C. Fuchs, R. Schack, D. J. Driebe, W. G. Hoover, H. Posch, B. L. Holian, R. Peierls, and J. L. Lebowitz. Is Boltzmann entropy time’s arrow’s archer. Phys. Today, 47(11):11–15, 1994

    1994

  12. [20]

    Barré, D

    J. Barré, D. Mukamel, and S. Ru ffo. Inequivalence of ensembles in a system with long-range interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87(3):030601, 2001

    2001

  13. [21]

    D. M. Basko, I. L. Aleiner, and B. L. Altshuler. On the problem of many- body localization. In A. L. Ivanov and S. G. Tikhodeev, editors, Problems of Condensed Matter Physics, pages 50–69. Oxford University Press, 2008

    2008

  14. [22]

    R. W. Batterman. The devil in the details: Asymptotic reasoning in explanation, reduction, and emergence. Oxford University Press, 2001

    2001

  15. [23]

    Benettin and A

    G. Benettin and A. Ponno. Time-scales to equipartition in the fermi–pasta–ulam problem: finite-size e ffects and thermodynamic limit. J. Stat. Phys., 144:793– 812, 2011

    2011

  16. [24]

    Benettin, L

    G. Benettin, L. Galgani, A. Giorgilli, and J.-M. Strelcyn. Lyapunov character- istic exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for hamiltonian systems; a method for computing all of them. part 1: Theory. Meccanica, 15:9–20, 1980

    1980

  17. [25]

    Benettin, H

    G. Benettin, H. Christodoulidi, and A. Ponno. The fermi-pasta-ulam problem and its underlying integrable dynamics. J. Stat. Phys., 152:195–212, 2013

    2013

  18. [26]

    Benzi, G

    R. Benzi, G. Paladin, G. Parisi, and A. Vulpiani. On the multifractal nature of fully developed turbulence and chaotic systems. J. Phys. A, 17(18):3521, 1984

    1984

  19. [27]

    Berman and F

    G. Berman and F. Izrailev. The fermi–pasta–ulam problem: fifty years of progress. Chaos, 15(1):015104, 2005. 131

    2005

  20. [28]

    M. V . Berry. Asymptotics, singularities and the reduction of theories. In D. Prawitz, B. Skyrms, and D. Westerståhl, editors, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IX, pages 597–607. Elsevier, 1994

    1994

  21. [29]

    M. V . Berry. Chaos and the semiclassical limit of quantum mechanics (is the moon there when somebody looks?). In R. J. Russell, P. Clayton, K. Wegter- McNelly, and J. Polkinghorne, editors,Quantum Mechanics: Scientific perspec- tives on divine action, pages 41 – 54. Vatican O...

    2001

  22. [30]

    Berthier and G

    L. Berthier and G. Biroli. Theoretical perspective on the glass transition and amorphous materials. Reviews of modern physics, 83(2):587, 2011

    2011

  23. [31]

    P. M. Bleher and J. G. Sinai. Investigation of the critical point in models of the type of Dyson’s hierarchical models. Comm. Math. Phys., 33(1):23 – 42, 1973

    1973

  24. [32]

    Bo ffetta, M

    G. Bo ffetta, M. Cencini, M. Falcioni, and A. Vulpiani. Predictability: a way to characterize complexity. Phys. Rep., 356(6):367–474, 2002

    2002

  25. [33]

    Bo ffetta, D

    G. Bo ffetta, D. del Castillo-Negrete, C. López, G. Pucacco, and A. Vulpiani. Diffusive transport and self-consistent dynamics in coupled maps. Phys. Rev. E, 67(2):026224, 2003

    2003

  26. [34]

    T. Bohr, M. H. Jensen, G. Paladin, and A. Vulpiani. Dynamical systems ap- proach to turbulence. Cambridge University Press, 1998

    1998

  27. [35]

    Boltzmann

    L. Boltzmann. Bemerkungen über einige Problemeder mechanischen Wärmetheorie. Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften zuWien, mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlicheClasse, Sitzungsberichte , 7:62–100, 1877

  28. [36]

    Boltzmann

    L. Boltzmann. Annalen der physik. reprinted and translated as Chapter 8 in [43], 1896

  29. [37]

    Boltzmann

    L. Boltzmann. Entgegnung auf die wärmetheoretischen Betrachtungen des Hrn. E. Zermelo. Annalen der Physik, 293(4):773–784, 1896. doi: https://doi.org/10. 1002/andp.18962930414

  30. [38]

    ueber die mechanische erklärung irreversibler vorgänge

    L. Boltzmann. Zu hrn. zermelo’s abhandlung “ueber die mechanische erklärung irreversibler vorgänge”. Annalen der Physik, 60:392, 1897

  31. [39]

    Boltzmann

    L. Boltzmann. Vorlesungen über Gastheorie. Barth, Leipzig, Part I 1896, Part II 1898. English translation by S.G. Brush: Lectures on Gas Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press (1964)

    1964

  32. [40]

    L. E. Boltzmann. Weitere studien iiber das warmegleichgewicht unter gas- molekiilen. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschafien, Wien , II(66): 275–370, 1872

  33. [41]

    E. Borel. Probabilities and life. Dover, London, 1962. 132

    1962

  34. [42]

    Bricmont

    J. Bricmont. Science of chaos or chaos in science? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 775(1):131–175, 1995

    1995

  35. [43]

    S. G. Brush. Kinetic Theory. Pergamon, Oxford, 1966

    1966

  36. [44]

    S. G. Brush. The Kinetic Theory Of Gases: An Anthology Of Classic Papers With Historical Commentary, volume 1. World Scientific, 2003

    2003

  37. [45]

    Bunimovich and Y

    L. Bunimovich and Y . G. Sinai. Statistical mechanics of coupled map lattices . Wiley, San-Francisco, 1993

    1993

  38. [46]

    H. B. Callen. Thermodynamics and an introduction to thermostatistics. Wiley, New York, NY , 2nd edition, 1985

    1985

  39. [47]

    Campa, T

    A. Campa, T. Dauxois, and S. Ruffo. Statistical mechanics and dynamics of solv- able models with long-range interactions. Phys. Rep., 480(3-6):57–159, 2009

    2009

  40. [48]

    Campa, T

    A. Campa, T. Dauxois, D. Fanelli, and S. Ruffo. Physics of long-range interact- ing systems. OUP Oxford, 2014

    2014

  41. [49]

    M. Campisi. Construction of microcanonical entropy on thermodynamic pillars. Phys. Rev. E, 91(5):052147, 2015

    2015

  42. [50]

    Campisi and D

    M. Campisi and D. H. Kobe. Derivation of the boltzmann principle. American Journal of Physics, 78(6):608–615, 2010

    2010

  43. [51]

    Caprara and A

    S. Caprara and A. Vulpiani. Law without law or “just” limit theorems? Foun- dations of Physics, 48(9):1112–1127, 2018

    2018

  44. [52]

    Carati, L

    A. Carati, L. Galgani, and A. Giorgilli. The fermi–pasta–ulam problem as a challenge for the foundations of physics. Chaos, 15(1):015105, 2005

    2005

  45. [53]

    Carleman

    T. Carleman. Sur la théorie de l’équation intégrodi fférentielle de Boltzmann. Acta Mathematica, 60(1):91–146, Mar 1933. ISSN 1871-2509. doi: 10.1007 / BF02398270

    1933

  46. [54]

    Castiglione, M

    P. Castiglione, M. Falcioni, A. Lesne, and A. Vulpiani. Chaos and coarse grain- ing in statistical mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 2008

    2008

  47. [55]

    A. Cavagna. Supercooled liquids for pedestrians. Phys. Rep., 476(4-6):51–124, 2009

    2009

  48. [56]

    Cecconi, D

    F. Cecconi, D. del Castillo-Negrete, M. Falcioni, and A. Vulpiani. The origin of diffusion: the case of non-chaotic systems. Physica D, 180(3-4):129–139, 2003

    2003

  49. [57]

    Cecconi, M

    F. Cecconi, M. Cencini, and A. Vulpiani. Transport properties of chaotic and non-chaotic many particle systems. J. Stat. Mech., 2007(12):P12001–P12001, Dec. 2007. ISSN 1742-5468. doi: 10.1088 /1742-5468/2007/12/p12001. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2007/12/P12001

    2007 doi

  50. [58]

    Cencini, F

    M. Cencini, F. Cecconi, and A. Vulpiani. Chaos: from simple models to complex systems. World Scientific, 2009. 133

    2009

  51. [59]

    Cercignani

    C. Cercignani. On the Boltzmann equation for rigid spheres. Trans- port Theory and Statistical Physics , 2(3):211–225, 1972. doi: 10.1080 / 00411457208232538

    1972

  52. [60]

    Cercignani

    C. Cercignani. The Boltzmann equation and its applications. Springer, 1988

    1988

  53. [61]

    Cercignani

    C. Cercignani. Ludwig Boltzmann: the man who trusted atoms. Oxford Univer- sity Press, 1998

    1998

  54. [62]

    Cercignani, R

    C. Cercignani, R. Illner, and M. Pulvirenti. The Mathematical Theory of Dilute Gases. Springer New York, 1994. doi: 10.1007 /978-1-4419-8524-8. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8524-8

    1994 doi

  55. [63]

    Cerino, G

    L. Cerino, G. Gradenigo, A. Sarracino, D. Villamaina, and A. Vulpiani. Fluc- tuations in partitioning systems with few degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. E, 89: 042105, 2014

    2014

  56. [64]

    Cerino, F

    L. Cerino, F. Cecconi, M. Cencini, and A. Vulpiani. The role of the number of degrees of freedom and chaos in macroscopic irreversibility. Physica A, 442: 486–497, 2016

    2016

  57. [65]

    Chakraborti, A

    S. Chakraborti, A. Dhar, S. Goldstein, A. Kundu, and J. L. Lebowitz. Entropy growth during free expansion of an ideal gas. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 55: 394002, 2022

    2022

  58. [66]

    Chibbaro, L

    S. Chibbaro, L. Rondoni, and A. Vulpiani. Reductionism, emergence and levels of reality. Springer, Berlin, 2014

    2014

  59. [67]

    M. D. Choi. Almost commuting matrices need not be nearly commuting. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 102:529–533, 1988

    1988

  60. [68]

    J. H. Christenson, J. W. Cronin, V . L. Fitch, and R. Turlay. Evidence for the 2π decay of the k 2 0 meson. Phys. Rev. Lett., 13(4):138, 1964

    1964

  61. [69]

    Cocciaglia, A

    N. Cocciaglia, A. Vulpiani, and G. Gradenigo. Thermalization without chaos in harmonic systems. Physica A, 601:127581, Sept. 2022. doi: 10.1016 /j.physa. 2022.127581. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127581

    2022

  62. [70]

    I. P. Cornfeld, S. V . Fomin, and Y . G. Sinai. Ergodic theory , volume 245. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  63. [71]

    J. W. Cronin. CP symmetry violation—the search for its origin.Rev. Mod. Phys., 53(3):373, 1981

    1981

  64. [72]

    Darrigol

    O. Darrigol. Atoms, Mechanics, and Probability: Ludwig Boltzmann’s Statistico-mechanical Writings–an Exegesis. Oxford University Press, 2018

    2018

  65. [73]

    Darrigol

    O. Darrigol. Boltzmann’s reply to the Loschmidt paradox: a commented trans- lation. The European Physical Journal H, 46:1–18, 2021. 134

    2021

  66. [74]

    de Pasquale, P

    F. de Pasquale, P. Tartaglia, and P. Tombesi. Stochastic dynamic approach to the decay of an unstable state. Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter , 43(4): 353–360, Dec 1981. ISSN 1431-584X. doi: 10.1007 /BF01292803

    1981

  67. [75]

    Dettmann and E

    C. Dettmann and E. Cohen. Microscopic chaos and di ffusion. J. Stat. Phys. , 101:775–817, 2000

    2000

  68. [76]

    Dettmann and E

    C. Dettmann and E. Cohen. Note on chaos and di ffusion. J. Stat. Phys., 103: 589–599, 2001

    2001

  69. [77]

    J. M. Deutsch. Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system. Phys. Rev. A, 43:2046–2049, 1991

    1991

  70. [78]

    R. J. DiPerna and P. L. Lions. On the cauchy problem for boltzmann equations: Global existence and weak stability. Annals of Mathematics , 130(2):321–366,

  71. [79]

    J. R. Dorfman. An Introduction to Chaos in Nonequilibrium Statistical Me- chanics. Cambridge University Press, Aug. 1999. ISBN 9780511628870. doi: 10.1017 /cbo9780511628870. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511628870

    1999

  72. [80]

    H. S. Dumas. The Kam Story: A Friendly Introduction To The Content, His- tory, And Significance Of Classical Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser Theory . World Scientific Publishing Company, 2014

    2014

  73. [81]

    Eckmann and D

    J.-P. Eckmann and D. Ruelle. Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Rev. Mod. Phys., 57(3):617, 1985

    1985

  74. [82]

    Ehrenfest and T

    P. Ehrenfest and T. Ehrenfest. Über zwei bekannte Einwände gegen das Boltz- mannsche H-Theorem. Physikalische Zeitschrift, 8:311–314, 1907

    1907

  75. [83]

    Ehrenfest and T

    P. Ehrenfest and T. Ehrenfest. The conceptual foundations of the statistical ap- proach in mechanics. Cornell University Press, New York, 1956, original Ger- man version 1912

    1956

  76. [84]

    Einstein

    A. Einstein. Autobiographical notes. In P. A. Schlipp, editor, Albert Einstein, Phylosopher-Scientist, The Library of Living Philosophers, page 43. sixt print- ing (1995) edition, 1949

    1995

  77. [85]

    R. S. Ellis. The theory of large deviations: from boltzmann’s 1877 calculation to equilibrium macrostates in 2d turbulence. Physica D, 133:106–136, 1999

    1999

  78. [86]

    G. G. Emch and C. Liu. The logic of thermostatistical physics. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  79. [87]

    Falcioni, U

    M. Falcioni, U. M. B. Marconi, and A. Vulpiani. Ergodic properties of high- dimensional symplectic maps. Phys. Rev. A, 44(4):2263, 1991. 135

    1991

  80. [88]

    Falcioni, A

    M. Falcioni, A. Vulpiani, G. Mantica, and S. Pigolotti. Coarse-grained prob- abilistic automata mimicking chaotic systems. Physical review letters, 91(4): 044101, 2003

    2003

  81. [89]

    Falcioni, L

    M. Falcioni, L. Palatella, and A. Vulpiani. Production rate of the coarse-grained gibbs entropy and the kolmogorov-sinai entropy: A real connection? Phys. Rev. E, 71:016118, Jan 2005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.016118. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.71.016118

    2005 doi

  82. [90]

    Falcioni, A

    M. Falcioni, A. Puglisi, A. Sarracino, D. Villamaina, and A.Vulpiani. Esti- mate of temperature and its uncertainty in small systems. American Journal of Physics, 79:777–785, 2011

    2011

  83. [91]

    E. Fermi. Dimostrazione che in generale un sistema meccanico normale è quasi ergodico. Il Nuovo Cimento (1911-1923), 25:267–269, 1923

    1911

  84. [92]

    E. Fermi. Collected Papers:(Note E Memorie). Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Roma and University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1965

    1965

  85. [93]

    Fermi, P

    E. Fermi, P. Pasta, S. Ulam, and M. Tsingou. Studies of the nonlinear problems. Technical report, Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States), 1955

    1955

  86. [94]

    J. Ford. How random is a coin toss? Physics Today, 36:40–47, 1983

    1983

  87. [95]

    J. Ford, G. Mantica, and G. H. Ristow. The arnol’d cat: Failure of the corre- spondence principle. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 50(3):493–520, 1991

    1991

  88. [96]

    D. Forster. Hydrodynamic Fluctuations, Broken Symmetry, and Correlation Functions. Frontiers in Physics 47, XIX, 326 S., London-Amsterdam-Don Mills-Sydney-Tokyo W. A. Benjamin, Inc, 1975

    1975

  89. [97]

    U. Frisch. Turbulence: the legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov. Cambridge University Press, 1995

    1995

  90. [98]

    Gallagher, L

    I. Gallagher, L. Saint-Raymond, and B. Texier. From Newton to Boltzmann: Hard Spheres and Short-range Potentials . European Mathematical Society, 2014

    2014

  91. [99]

    Gallavotti

    G. Gallavotti. Rigorous theory of the Boltzmann equation in the Lorentz gas. Technical report, Istituto di Fisica, Universitá di Roma. Nota interna n. 358, 1972

    1972

  92. [100]

    Gallavotti

    G. Gallavotti. Statistical mechanics: A short treatise. Springer Science & Busi- ness Media, 1999

    1999

  93. [101]

    Gallavotti

    G. Gallavotti. The Fermi-Pasta-Ulam problem: a status report. Springer-Verlag, 2007

    2007

  94. [102]

    Gallavotti, J

    G. Gallavotti, J. Lebowitz, and V . Mastropietro. Large deviations in rarefied quantum gases. J. Stat. Physics, 108:831–861, 2002. 136

    2002

  95. [103]

    P. Gaspard. Chaos, Scattering and Statistical Mechanics . Cambridge Non- linear Science Series. Cambridge University Press, 1998. doi: 10.1017 / CBO9780511628856

    1998

  96. [104]

    P. Gaspard. The Statistical Mechanics of Irreversible Phenomena . Cambridge University Press, 2022

    2022

  97. [105]

    Gemmer and G

    J. Gemmer and G. Mahler. Distribution of local entropy in the hilbert space of bi-partite quantum systems: Origin of jaynes’ principle. Euro. Phys. J. B , 31: 249–257, 2003

    2003

  98. [106]

    Gemmer, G

    J. Gemmer, G. Mahler, and M. Michel. Quantum Thermodynamics: Emergence of Thermodynamic Behavior within Composite Quantum Systems. Lecture Notes in Physics 657. Springer, Berlin, 2004

    2004

  99. [107]

    Ghofraniha, I

    N. Ghofraniha, I. Viola, F. Di Maria, G. Barbarella, G. Gigli, L. Leuzzi, and C. Conti. Experimental evidence of replica symmetry breaking in random lasers. Nature communications, 6(1):6058, 2015

    2015

  100. [108]

    J. W. Gibbs. Elementary principles in statistical mechanics: developed with especial reference to the rational foundations of thermodynamics. C. Scribner’s Sons, 1902

    1902

  101. [109]

    Gogolin and J

    C. Gogolin and J. Eisert. Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of sta- tistical mechanics in closed quantum systems. Reports on Progress in Physics, 79:056001, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07538

    2016 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Goldstein

    S. Goldstein. Boltzmann’s approach to statistical mechanics. In J. Bricmont, D. Dürr, M. C. Galavotti, G. C. Ghirardi, F. Petruccione, and N. Zanghì, editors, Chance in Physics: Foundations and Perspectives , volume 574, pages 39–54. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001

    2001

  103. [111]

    Goldstein

    S. Goldstein. Typicality and notions of probability in physics. In Y . Ben- Menahem and M. Hemmo, editors, Probability in physics , pages 59–71. Springer, 2012

    2012

  104. [112]

    Goldstein and J

    S. Goldstein and J. L. Lebowitz. On the (boltzmann) entropy of nonequilibrium systems. Physica D, 193:53–66, 2004

    2004

  105. [113]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì. On the distribution of the wave function for systems in thermal equilibrium. J. Stat. Phys. , 125: 1193–1221, 2006. doi: 10.1007 /s10955-006-9210-z

    2006

  106. [114]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì. Canonical typicality. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:050403, 2006. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/ 0511091

    2006

  107. [115]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, C. Mastrodonato, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì. Normal typicality and von neumann’s quantum ergodic theorem. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 466 (2123):3203–3224, 2010. 137

    2010

  108. [116]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, C. Mastrodonato, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì. Approach to thermal equilibrium of macroscopic quantum systems. Phys. Rev. E, 81(1):011109, 2010

    2010

  109. [117]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì. Long-time behavior of macroscopic quantum systems: Commentary accompanying the english transla- tion of john von neumann’s 1929 article on the quantum ergodic theorem. The European Physical Journal H, 35:173–200, 2010

    1929

  110. [118]

    Goldstein, T

    S. Goldstein, T. Hara, and H. Tasaki. Time scales in the approach to equilibrium of macroscopic quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:140401, 2013. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.0572

    2013 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Goldstein, T

    S. Goldstein, T. Hara, and H. Tasaki. The approach to equilibrium in a macro- scopic quantum system for a typical nonequilibrium subspace, 2014. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.3380

    2014 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Goldstein, T

    S. Goldstein, T. Hara, and H. Tasaki. Extremely quick thermalization in a macro- scopic quantum system for a typical nonequilibrium subspace.New J. Phys., 17: 045002, 2015

    2015

  113. [121]

    Goldstein, D

    S. Goldstein, D. A. Huse, J. L. Lebowitz, and R. Tumulka. Thermal equilibrium of a macroscopic quantum system in a pure state. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115:100402, 2015

    2015

  114. [122]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, C. Mastrodonato, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì. Universal probability distribution for the wave function of a quantum system entangled with its environment. Commun. Math. Phys. , 342:965–988, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s00220-015-2536-0

    2016 doi

  115. [123]

    Goldstein, D

    S. Goldstein, D. A. Huse, J. L. Lebowitz, and R. Tumulka. Macroscopic and microscopic thermal equilibrium. Annalen der Physik, 529:1600301, 2017

    2017

  116. [124]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì. Any orthonormal basis in high dimension is uniformly distributed over the sphere. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques , 53(2):701 – 717, 2017. doi: 10.1214/15-AIHP732. URL https://doi.org/1...

    2017 doi

  117. [125]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, and N. Zanghì. Gibbs and boltzmann entropy in classical and quantum mechanics. In V . Allori, editor, Statistical Mechanics and Scientific Explanation: Determinism, Indeterminism and Laws of Nature, pages 519–581. 2020

    2020

  118. [126]

    G. A. Gottwald and M. Oliver. Boltzmann’s dilemma: An introduction to sta- tistical mechanics via the kac ring. SIAM Review, 51(3):613–635, 2009. doi: 10.1137/070705799

    2009 doi

  119. [127]

    H. Grad. Levels of description in statistical mechanics and thermodynamics. In M. Bunge, editor, Delaware Seminar in the Foundations of Physics , pages 49–76. Springer, 1967. 138

    1967

  120. [128]

    Gradenigo, F

    G. Gradenigo, F. Antenucci, and L. Leuzzi. Glassiness and lack of equipartition in random lasers: The common roots of ergodicity breaking in disordered and nonlinear systems. Phys. Rev. Research, 2(2):023399, 2020

    2020

  121. [129]

    Gradenigo, S

    G. Gradenigo, S. Iubini, R. Livi, and S. N. Majumdar. Localization transition in the discrete nonlinear schrödinger equation: ensembles inequivalence and negative temperatures. J. Stat. Mech., 2021(2):023201, 2021

    2021

  122. [130]

    Gradenigo, S

    G. Gradenigo, S. Iubini, R. Livi, and S. N. Majumdar. Condensation transition and ensemble inequivalence in the discrete nonlinear schrödinger equation. The European Physical Journal E, 44:1–6, 2021

    2021

  123. [131]

    Gri ffiths

    R. Gri ffiths. Statistical irreversibility: Classical and quantum. In J. J. Halliwell, J. P´rez-Mercader, and W. H. Zurek, editors,Physical Origin of Time Asymmetry., pages 147–159. Cambridge University Press, 1994

    1994

  124. [132]

    M. Henón. Integrals of the toda lattice. Phys. Rev. B, 9(4):1921, 1974

    1921

  125. [133]

    Henrici and T

    A. Henrici and T. Kappeler. Results on normal forms for fpu chains. Communi- cations in mathematical physics, 278(1):145–177, 2008

    2008

  126. [134]

    L. Hurd, C. Grebogi, and E. Ott. On the tendency toward ergodicity with in- creasing number of degrees of freedom in hamiltonian systems. Hamiltonian Mechanics: Integrability and Chaotic Behavior, pages 123–129, 1994

    1994

  127. [135]

    A. Hájek. Interpretations of Probability. In E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman, editors, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Winter 2023 edition, 2023

    2023

  128. [136]

    Illner and M

    R. Illner and M. Pulvirenti. Global validity of the Boltzmann equation for a two-dimensional rare gas in vacuum. Comm. Math. Phys., 105(2):189–203, Jun

  129. [137]

    Illner and M

    R. Illner and M. Pulvirenti. Global validity of the Boltzmann equation for two- and three-dimensional rare gas in vacuum: Erratum and improved re- sult. Comm. Math. Phys., 121(1):143–146, Mar 1989. ISSN 1432-0916. doi: 10.1007/BF01218628

    1989 doi

  130. [138]

    Izrailev and B

    F. Izrailev and B. Chirikov. Statistical properties of a nonlinear string (institute of nuclear physics, novosibirsk, ussr, 1965). In Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, volume 166, page 57, 1966

    1965

  131. [139]

    R. Jancel. Foundations of Classical and Quantum Statistical Mechanics: Inter- national Series of Monographs in Natural Philosophy. Elsevier, 2013

    2013

  132. [140]

    E. T. Jaynes. Foundations of probability theory and statistical mechanics. In M. Bunge, editor, Delaware seminar in the foundations of physics , pages 77–

  133. [141]

    R. V . Jensen and R. Shankar. Statistical behavior in deterministic quantum sys- tems with few degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. Lett., 54:1879–1882, 1985. 139

    1985

  134. [142]

    Jona-Lasinio

    G. Jona-Lasinio. The renormalization group: A probabilistic view. Nuovo Ci- mento B, 26:99–119, 1975

    1975

  135. [143]

    Jona-Lasinio

    G. Jona-Lasinio. Renormalization group and probability theory. Phys. Rep., 352 (4-6):439–458, 2001

    2001

  136. [144]

    M. Kac. Random walk and the theory of brownian motion. The American Mathematical Monthly, 54(7):369–391, 1947. ISSN 00029890, 19300972

    1947

  137. [145]

    M. Kac. On the notion of recurrence in discrete stochastic processes. Bullettin of the American Mathematical Society, 53:1002–1010, 1947

    1947

  138. [146]

    M. Kac. Probability and related topics in physical sciences. American Mathe- matical Soc., 1959

    1959

  139. [147]

    L. P. Kadano ff, W. Götze, D. Hamblen, R. Hecht, E. Lewis, V . V . Palciauskas, M. Rayl, J. Swift, D. Aspnes, and J. Kane. Static phenomena near critical points: theory and experiment. Rev. Mod. Phys., 39(2):395, 1967

    1967

  140. [148]

    Kaneko and T

    K. Kaneko and T. Konishi. Transition, ergodicity and lyapunov spectra of hamil- tonian dynamical systems. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , 56(9): 2993–2996, 1987

    1987

  141. [149]

    A. Y . Khinchin. Mathematical foundations of statistical mechanics . Courier Corporation, 1949

    1949

  142. [150]

    A. N. Kolmogorov. On conservation of conditionally periodic motions for a small change in hamilton’s function. 98:527–530, 1954

    1954

  143. [151]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless. Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics , 6(7): 1181, apr 1973. doi: 10.1088 /0022-3719/6/7/010

    1973

  144. [152]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz. Statistical Physics: Volume 5. 1969

    1969

  145. [153]

    O. E. Lanford. Entropy and equilibrium states in classical statistical mechanics. In A. Lenard, editor, Statistical Mechanics and Mathematical Problems , pages 1–113. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973

    1973

  146. [154]

    O. E. Lanford. Time evolution of large classical systems. In J. Moser, editor, Dynamical Systems, Theory and Applications , pages 1–111. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975

    1975

  147. [155]

    O. E. Lanford. The hard sphere gas in the Boltzmann-Grad limit. Physica A, 106 (1):70–76, 1981. ISSN 0378-4371. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(81) 90207-7

    1981 doi

  148. [156]

    Lazarovici and P

    D. Lazarovici and P. Reichert. Typicality, irreversibility and the status of macro- scopic laws. Erkenntnis, 80(4):689–716, 2015. 140

    2015

  149. [157]

    J. L. Lebowitz et al. Boltzmann’s entropy and time’s arrow. Physics Today, 46: 32–32, 1993

    1993

  150. [158]

    Lenci and L

    M. Lenci and L. Rey-Bellet. Large deviations in quantum lattice systems: One- phase region. J. Stat. Phys., 119:715–746, 2005

    2005

  151. [159]

    Linden, S

    N. Linden, S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter. Quantum mechanical evolu- tion towards thermal equilibrium. Phys. Rev. E, 79(6):061103, 2009

    2009

  152. [160]

    R. Livi, A. Politi, and S. Ru ffo. Distribution of characteristic exponents in the thermodynamic limit. J. Phys. A, 19(11):2033, 1986

    1986

  153. [161]

    R. Livi, M. Pettini, S. Ru ffo, and A. Vulpiani. Chaotic behavior in nonlinear hamiltonian systems and equilibrium statistical mechanics.Journal of statistical physics, 48:539–559, 1987

    1987

  154. [162]

    Loschmidt

    J. Loschmidt. Über den Zustand des Wärmegleichgewichtes eines Sytsems von Körpern mit Rücksicht auf die Schwerkraft. I. Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften zuWien, mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlicheClasse, Sitzungs- berichte, 73:128–142, 1876

  155. [163]

    Lychkovskiy

    O. Lychkovskiy. Dependence of decoherence-assisted classicality on the way a system is partitioned into subsystems. Phys. Rev. A, 87:022112, 2013. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.4124

    2013 arXiv

  156. [164]

    S.-K. Ma. Statistical mechanics. World Scientific Publishing Company, 1985

    1985

  157. [165]

    Y . Ma, Q. Tan, R. Yuan, B. Yuan, and P. Ao. Potential function in a contin- uous dissipative chaotic system: Decomposition scheme and role of strange attractor. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos , 24(02):1450015,

  158. [166]

    G. Mantica. Quantum algorithmic integrability: the metaphor of classical polyg- onal billiards. Phys. Rev. E, 61(6):6434, 2000

    2000

  159. [167]

    G. Mantica. Quantum algorithmic integrability: the metaphor of classical polyg- onal billiards. Physical Review E, 61(6):6434, 2000

    2000

  160. [168]

    J. C. Maxwell. On boltzmann’s theorem on the average distribution of energy in a system of material points. Cambridge Philosophical Society’s Transations, 12:713–741, 1879

  161. [169]

    Mazur and J

    P. Mazur and J. Van der Linden. Asymptotic form of the structure function for real systems. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 4(2):271–277, 1963

    1963

  162. [170]

    J. Mehra. The Golden Age Of Theoretical Physics. World Scientific, 2001. 141

    2001

  163. [171]

    B. Merz, C. Kuhlicke, M. Kunz, M. Pittore, A. Babeyko, D. N. Bresch, D. I. Domeisen, V , F. Feser, I. Koszalka, H. Kreibich, F. Pantillon, S. Parolai, J. G. Pinto, H. J. Punge, E. Rivalta, K. Schroeter, K. Strehlow, R. Weisse, and A. Wurpts. Impact forecasting to support emerg...

    2020

  164. [172]

    Mézard and G

    M. Mézard and G. Parisi. Thermodynamics of glasses: A first principles com- putation. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 11(10A):A157, 1999

    1999

  165. [173]

    Mézard, G

    M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and M. A. Virasoro. Spin glass theory and beyond: An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications, volume 9. World Sci- entific Publishing Company, 1987

    1987

  166. [174]

    Morgenstern

    D. Morgenstern. General existence and uniqueness proof for spatially homoge- neous solutions of the maxwell-boltzmann equation in the case of maxwellian molecules<sup>*</sup>. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 40 (8):719–721, 1954. doi: 10.1073 /pnas.40.8.719

    1954

  167. [175]

    T. Mori, T. N. Ikeda, E. Kaminishi, and M. Ueda. Thermalization and prether- malization in isolated quantum systems: a theoretical overview. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys., 51:112001, 2018

    2018

  168. [176]

    J. Möser. On invariant curves of area-preserving mappings of an annulus.Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen, II, pages 1–20, 1962

    1962

  169. [177]

    I. Müller. A history of thermodynamics: the doctrine of energy and entropy . Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

    2007

  170. [178]

    E. Nagel. The structure of science. Hackett Publishing Company Indianapolis, 1979

    1979

  171. [179]

    Nandkishore and D

    R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse. Many body localization and thermalization in quantum statistical mechanics. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 6: 15–38, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.0686

    2015 arXiv

  172. [180]

    Neto ˇcný and F

    K. Neto ˇcný and F. Redig. Large deviations for quantum spin systems. J. Stat. Phys., 117:521–547, 2004

    2004

  173. [181]

    Nicolis and I

    G. Nicolis and I. Prigogine. Self-organization in nonequilibrium systems. In J. Schnakenberg, editor, From Dissipative Structures to Order through Fluctua- tions, number 6, pages 672–672. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, London, Sydney, Toronto, 1978. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bb...

    1978 doi

  174. [182]

    Niedda, G

    J. Niedda, G. Gradenigo, L. Leuzzi, and G. Parisi. Universality class of the mode-locked glassy random laser. SciPost Physics, 14(6):144, 2023

    2023

  175. [183]

    Niedda, L

    J. Niedda, L. Leuzzi, and G. Gradenigo. Intensity pseudo-localized phase in the glassy random laser. J. Stat. Mech., 2023(5):053302, 2023

    2023

  176. [184]

    Oganesyan and D

    V . Oganesyan and D. A. Huse. Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature. Phys. Rev. B, 75:155111, 2007. 142

    2007

  177. [185]

    Y . Ogata. Large deviations in quantum spin chains. Commun. Math. Phys., 296: 35, 2010

    2010

  178. [186]

    Y . Ogata. Approximating macroscopic observables in quantum spin systems with commuting matrices. Journal of Functional Analysis , 264:2005–2033, 2013

    2005

  179. [187]

    L. Onsager. Statistical hydrodynamics. Il Nuovo Cimento , 6(S2):279–287, Mar. 1949. doi: 10.1007 /bf02780991. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ bf02780991

    1949

  180. [188]

    Orban and A

    J. Orban and A. Bellemans. Velocity-inversion and irreversibility in a dilute gas of hard disks. Phys. Lett. A, 24(11):620–621, May 1967

    1967

  181. [189]

    Paladin and A

    G. Paladin and A. Vulpiani. Anomalous scaling laws in multifractal objects. Phys. Rep., 156(4):147–225, 1987

    1987

  182. [190]

    T. N. Palmer. Predicting uncertainty in forecasts of weather and climate.Reports on progress in Physics, 63(2):71, 2000

    2000

  183. [191]

    Pandey, J

    S. Pandey, J. M. Bhat, A. Dhar, S. Goldstein, D. Huse, M. Kulkarni1, A. Kundu, and J. Lebowitz. Boltzmann entropy of a freely expanding quantum ideal gas. J Stat Phys, 190:142, 2023

    2023

  184. [192]

    G. Parisi. Infinite number of order parameters for spin-glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett., 43:1754–1756, Dec 1979. doi: 10.1103 /PhysRevLett.43.1754. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1754

    1979 doi

  185. [193]

    Parisi, P

    G. Parisi, P. Urbani, and F. Zamponi. Theory of simple glasses: exact solutions in infinite dimensions. Cambridge University Press, 2020

    2020

  186. [194]

    L. Peliti. Statistical mechanics in a nutshell. Princeton University Press, 2011

    2011

  187. [195]

    R. Penrose. The Road to Reality. Jonathan Cape, London, 2004

    2004

  188. [196]

    J. B. Pesin. Characteristic Ljapunov exponents, and ergodic properties of smooth dynamical systems with invariant measure. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR , 226(4): 774–777, 1976. ISSN 0002-3264

    1976

  189. [197]

    L. P. Pitaevskii and E. Lifshitz. Physical Kinetics: Volume 10 . Butterworth- Heinemann, 2012

    2012

  190. [198]

    Poincaré

    H. Poincaré. Les méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste , volume 2. Gauthier-Villars et fils, imprimeurs-libraires, 1893

  191. [199]

    Popescu, A

    S. Popescu, A. J. Short, and A. Winter. Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics. Nature Physics, 2(11):754–758, 2006

    2006

  192. [200]

    K. R. Popper. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, 2002. 143

    2002

  193. [201]

    Prigogine

    I. Prigogine. Irreversibility and space-time structure. In W. Horsthemke and D. Kondepudi, editors, Fluctuations and sensitivity in nonequilibrium systems , pages 2–10. Springer, 1984

    1984

  194. [202]

    Prigogine and I

    I. Prigogine and I. Stengers. La nouvelle alliance Métamorphose de la science. 1979

    1979

  195. [203]

    Pulvirenti and S

    M. Pulvirenti and S. Simonella. The boltzmann–grad limit of a hard sphere system: analysis of the correlation error. Inventiones mathematicae, 207(3): 1135–1237, Mar 2017

    2017

  196. [204]

    Pulvirenti, C

    M. Pulvirenti, C. Sa ffirio, and S. Simonella. On the validity of the boltzmann equation for short range potentials. Reviews in Mathematical Physics , 26(02): 1450001, 2014. doi: 10.1142 /S0129055X14500019

    2014

  197. [205]

    N. F. Ramsey. Thermodynamics and statistical mechanics at negative absolute temperatures. Phys. Rev., 103:20–28, Jul 1956. doi: 10.1103 /PhysRev.103.20. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.103.20

    1956 doi

  198. [206]

    P. Reimann. Typicality for generalized microcanonical ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99:160404, 2007. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4214

    2007 arXiv

  199. [207]

    P. Reimann. Foundation of statistical mechanics under experimentally realistic conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 101:190403, 2008. URL http://arxiv.org/ abs/0810.3092

    2008 arXiv

  200. [208]

    P. Reimann. Canonical thermalization. New J. Phys., 12:055027, 2010. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.5625

    2010 arXiv

  201. [209]

    P. Reimann. Generalization of von neumann’s approach to thermalization. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115:010403, 2015

    2015

  202. [210]

    P. Reimann. Eigenstate thermalization: Deutsch’s approach and beyond. New J. Phys., 17:055025, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07627

    2015 arXiv

  203. [211]

    Rigol and M

    M. Rigol and M. Srednicki. Alternatives to eigenstate thermalization. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:110601, 2012. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0928

    2012 arXiv

  204. [213]

    Rigol, M

    V . Rigol, M. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii. Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems. Nature, 452:854–858, 2008. URL http: //arxiv.org/abs/0708.1324

    2008 arXiv

  205. [214]

    J. A. G. Roberts and G. R. W. Quispel. Chaos and time-reversal symmetry. order and chaos in reversible dynamical systems. Phys. Rep., 216:63–177, 1992. 144

    1992

  206. [215]

    S. Ru ffo. Time-scales for the approach to thermal equilibrium. In J. Bricmont, D. Dürr, M. C. Galavotti, G. C. Ghirardi, F. Petruccione, and N. Zanghì, editors, Chance in Physics: Foundations and Perspectives , pages 243–251. Springer- Verlag, Heidelberg, 2001

    2001

  207. [216]

    Safranek, J

    D. Safranek, J. M. Deutsch, and A. Aguirre. Quantum coarse-grained entropy and thermodynamics. Phys. Rev. A, 99:010101, 2017. URL http://arxiv. org/abs/1707.09722

    2017 arXiv

  208. [217]

    Safranek, J

    D. Safranek, J. M. Deutsch, and A. Aguirre. Quantum coarse-grained entropy and thermalization in closed systems. Phys. Rev. A , 99:012103, 2018. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.00665

    2018 arXiv

  209. [218]

    Saito, S

    K. Saito, S. Takesue, and S. Miyashita. System-size dependence of statistical behavior in quantum system. J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 65:1243, 1996

    1996

  210. [219]

    Schrödinger

    E. Schrödinger. The exchange of energy according to wave mechanics. Annalen der Physik (4), 83:956–968, 1927

    1927

  211. [220]

    Schrödinger

    E. Schrödinger. Statistical Thermodynamics. Cambridge University Press, sec- ond edition, 1952

    1952

  212. [221]

    Shafer and V

    G. Shafer and V . V ovk.Probability and finance: it’s only a game! John Wiley & Sons, 2005

    2005

  213. [222]

    H. Spohn. Generalized gibbs ensembles of the classical toda chain. J. Stat. Phys., 180(1-6):4–22, 2020

    2020

  214. [223]

    Srednicki

    M. Srednicki. Chaos and quantum thermalization. Phys. Rev. E, 50:888–901, 1994

    1994

  215. [224]

    Srednicki

    M. Srednicki. Thermal fluctuations in quantized chaotic systems. J. Phys. A, 29: L75–L79, 1996

    1996

  216. [225]

    Srednicki

    M. Srednicki. The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic sys- tems. J. Phys. A, 32:1163–1176, 1999

    1999

  217. [226]

    V . S. Steckline. Zermelo, Boltzmann, and the recurrence paradox. American Journal of Physics, 51(10):894–897, 1983. doi: 10.1119 /1.13373

    1983

  218. [227]

    A. Sugita. On the basis of quantum statistical mechanics. Nonlinear Phenom- ena in Complex Systems , 10:192–195, 2007. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/ cond-mat/0602625

    2007 arXiv

  219. [228]

    Sugiura and A

    S. Sugiura and A. Shimizu. Canonical thermal pure quantum state. Phys. Rev. Lett., 111(1):010401, 2013

    2013

  220. [229]

    H. Tasaki. From quantum dynamics to the canonical distribution: General pic- ture and a rigorous example. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80:1373–1376, 1998. 145

    1998

  221. [230]

    thermodynamic normal- ity

    H. Tasaki. The approach to thermal equilibrium and "thermodynamic normal- ity", 2010. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5424

    2010 arXiv

  222. [231]

    H. Tasaki. Typicality of thermal equilibrium and thermalization in isolated macroscopic quantum systems. J. Stat. Phys., 163:937–997, 2016

    2016

  223. [232]

    H. Tasaki. Macroscopic Irreversibility in Quantum Systems: ETH and Equi- libration in a Free Fermion Chain, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2401.15263

    2024 arXiv

  224. [233]

    Truesdell

    C. Truesdell. The ergodic problem in classical statistical mechanics, pages 65–

  225. [234]

    R. Tumulka. Lecture notes on mathematical statistical physics, 2019. URL www.math.uni-tuebingen.de/de/forschung/maphy/lehre/ss-2019/ statisticalphysics/dateien/lecture-notes.pdf

    2019

  226. [235]

    Tumulka and N

    R. Tumulka and N. Zanghì. Smoothness of wave functions in thermal equilib- rium. J. Math. Phys., 46:112104, 2005

    2005

  227. [236]

    J. U ffink. Can the maximum entropy principle be explained as a consistency requirement? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 26(3):223–261, 1995

    1995

  228. [237]

    N. G. Van Kampen. Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry . Elsevier, 1992

    1992

  229. [238]

    ISBN 978-3-662- 29756-8

    Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1966. ISBN 978-3-662- 29756-8. doi: 10.1007 /978-3-662-29756-8_5. URL https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-662-29756-8_5

    1966

  230. [239]

    von Neumann

    J. von Neumann. Beweis des ergodensatzes und des h-theorems in der neuen mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik , 57:30–70, 1929. URL http://arxiv. org/abs/1003.2133. English translation in European Physical Journal H 35: 201–237 (2010) http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2133

    2010 arXiv

  231. [240]

    K. N. W. De Roeck, C. Maes. Quantum macrostates, equivalence of ensembles, and an h-theorem. J. Math. Phys., 47:073303, 2006. doi: 10.1063 /1.2217810

    2006

  232. [241]

    J. D. Walecka. Fundamentals of Statistical Mechanics. Manuscript and Notes of Felix Bloch. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1989

    1989

  233. [242]

    E. P. Wigner. Random matrices in physics. SIAM Review, 9:1–23, 1967

    1967

  234. [243]

    J. L. Vega, T. Uzer, and J. Ford. Chaotic billiards with neutral boundaries. Phys. Rev. E, 48(5):3414, 1993

    1993

  235. [244]

    V . Yukalov. Irreversibility of time for quasi-isolated systems. Phys. Lett. A , 308(5):313–318, 2003. ISSN 0375-9601. doi: https: //doi.org/10. 1016/S0375-9601(03)00056-2. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0375960103000562

    2003

  236. [245]

    N. Zanghì. I fondamenti concettuali dell’approccio statistico in fisica. In V . Al- lori, M. Dorato, F. Laudisa, and N. Zanghì, editors, La Natura Delle Cose. In- troduzione ai Fundamenti e alla Filosofia della Fisica, pages 139–228. Carocci Roma, 2005

    2005

  237. [246]

    E. Zermelo. Ueber einen satz der dynamik und die mechanische wärmetheorie. Annalen der Physik, 293(3):485–494, 1896. doi: https: //doi.org/10.1002/andp. 18962930314

    doi

  238. [247]

    W. H. Zurek. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classi- cal. Rev. Mod. Phys., 75(3):715, 2003

    2003

  239. [248]

    K. G. Wilson. Renormalization group and critical phenomena. i. renormalization group and the kadanoff scaling picture. Phys. Rev. B, 4:3174–3183, Nov 1971. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.4.3174. 146

    1971 doi

  240. [253]

    W. H. Zurek. Eliminating ensembles from equilibrium statistical physics: Maxwell’s demon, Szilard’s engine, and thermodynamics via entanglement. Phys. Rep., 755:1–21, 2018. 147

    2018

  241. [1573]

    URL https://www

    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2021.03.007. URL https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157321001204. Sta- tistical mechanics of systems with negative temperature

    2021 doi

  242. [1986]

    doi: 10.1007 /BF01211098

    ISSN 1432-0916. doi: 10.1007 /BF01211098

  243. [1989]

    URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1971423

    ISSN 0003486X. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1971423

  244. [2014]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218127414500151

    doi: 10.1142/S0218127414500151. URL https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218127414500151

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.