Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 33 references

Large critical fields in superconducting Ti$_{4}$Ir$_2$O from spin-orbit coupling

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Symmetry explains Ti4Ir2O's Pauli-limit violation.

desk verdict A credible symmetry-based mechanism for Pauli-limit violation in Ti4Ir2O, but the quantitative size of the effect hangs on the Fermi level sitting at a Van Hove singularity that DFT places only 13 meV from the peak. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09793 v1 pith:BLKBWW7T submitted 2024-11-14 cond-mat.supr-con

Hao Wu , Tatsuya Shishidou , Michael Weinert , Daniel F. Agterberg This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords Ti4Ir2OPauliparamagneticlimituppercriticalfieldspin-orbitcouplinganomalouspseudospinnonsymmorphicsymmetryVanHovesingularityeta-carbidesuperconductors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ti4Ir2O is a cubic, inversion-symmetric superconductor whose measured upper critical field far exceeds the Pauli paramagnetic limit—the usual ceiling set by the magnetic energy needed to flip electron spins and break Cooper pairs—a combination that is unusual for centrosymmetric materials. The paper's claim is that this is a symmetry effect: the nonsymmorphic crystal structure forces electrons near the X points of the Brillouin zone to form "anomalous pseudospin" states whose effective g-factor nearly vanishes for magnetic fields in certain directions. A Van Hove singularity (a band-flattening that creates a strong density-of-states peak) about 13 meV below the chemical potential concentrates roughly 65% of the total density of states in exactly these X-centered bands. The two ingredients together raise the Pauli-limiting field by factors of 2–3 and lead to the prediction that an applied field suppresses the superconducting gap in a strongly momentum-dependent way.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the anomalous pseudospin state on the X-point momentum lines. A pseudospin is the effective spin-like degree of freedom carried by a Kramers pair; here it is "anomalous" because the glide symmetries of Fd-3m lock its quantization axis to the momentum line, so a magnetic field perpendicular to that line has almost no effect on it. The analysis is carried by a kp Hamiltonian (a low-energy Hamiltonian expanded around the X point) built from the four-fold X4 irreducible representation, the symmetry label of the relevant bands, with sublattice and spin Pauli matrices. Its eigenvalue structure shows nodal lines at kx = ky = 0 and ky = kz = 0 when spin-orbit coupling is absent, and SOC-only splitting along them. The Pauli-limiting field is then computed from an effective $g$-factor $\tilde{g}_{k,\hat h}$ whose Fermi-surface average enters the analytic formula $h_P/h_0 = \langle -\ln \tilde{g}_{k,\hat h}\rangle_k$; the paper shows that the Van Hove singularity, which in the quadratic model is a circle of saddle points producing a logarithmic density-of-states divergence, survives in the k3 model as the observed near-chemical-potential peak with about 65% of the total DOS.

What would settle it

Measure the upper critical field of a single crystal as the field is rotated between [100] and [110]: the theory predicts a symmetry-dictated anisotropy with the enhancement largest for [100], so a near-isotropic Hc2 would rule the mechanism out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the strong violation of the Pauli limit in Ti4Ir2O is not an accident of strong coupling or multiband physics but is enforced by the nonsymmorphic space group Fd-3m. In the absence of spin-orbit coupling, each X point sits at the intersection of two orthogonal momentum lines on which glide-mirror symmetries protect a four-fold degeneracy. Spin-orbit coupling splits each such degeneracy into two Kramers pairs, and symmetry dictates that these pairs couple to a Zeeman field along only one direction; for fields perpendicular to the original line, the effective g-factor vanishes. The authors derive a kp Hamiltonian for the X4 states, show analytically that ellipsoidal Fermi surfaces around each X point already give a Pauli-field enhancement of about e, and that the realistic k3 model with a Van Hove singularity yields enhancements of 2–3. They locate the Van Hove singularity about 13 meV below the theoretical chemical potential, where the X-centered bands contribute about 65% of the total density of states, and identify the same symmetry physics as the origin of the measured pressure dependence and high-field specific-heat anomalies. The paper closes with two predictions: an anisotropy in the paramagnetic response and a field-driven momentum-dependent suppression of the superconducting gap.

Load-bearing premise

The DFT chemical potential sits close enough to the Van Hove singularity, about 13 meV away from the DOS peak, that the X-centered bands truly dominate the superconducting response; if the real material's chemical potential sits farther away, the computed enhancement drops and the quantitative match to the observed Pauli-limit violation weakens.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For purely ellipsoidal Fermi surfaces around each X point, the Pauli-limiting field is enhanced by roughly a factor $e \approx 2.7$ for all field directions; the full $k^3$ model with the Van Hove singularity gives enhancements of 2–3.
  • In a magnetic field, the superconducting gap is suppressed much faster on Fermi-surface regions with g near 1 than on the X-centered anomalous-pseudospin regions, producing a field-induced momentum-dependent gap structure.
  • The mechanism naturally explains the observed drop of the upper critical field under pressure: pressure moves the Van Hove singularity relative to the chemical potential and removes the low-g-factor states from the Fermi surface.
  • The high-field specific-heat anomalies previously attributed to an FFLO state follow instead from two sets of electrons with very different g-factors, producing a partially gapless state as the normal-g-factor band is suppressed.
  • The theory predicts an observable anisotropy of the paramagnetic response for field directions such as [100] versus [110].

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism holds, shifting the chemical potential by even roughly 10 meV through controlled doping or vacancies should sharply change the upper critical field, because the Van Hove singularity's roughly 65% share of the density of states would be gained or lost.
  • The same glide-symmetry argument should apply to other Fd-3m eta-carbide superconductors, so the spread of Pauli-limit violations across the family may be governed mainly by where each compound's chemical potential sits relative to its X-point singularity.
  • A momentum-resolved probe under strong field, such as planar tunneling spectroscopy on a single crystal, should directly image the predicted survival of the X-point gap while other Fermi-surface regions are driven gapless.
  • Because the vanishing g-factor is symmetry-enforced rather than tuned, the mechanism should be robust to material-specific band parameters as long as the X4 states remain near the Fermi level; the fragile part is only the Van Hove singularity's proximity to the chemical potential.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the origin of the enhanced upper critical field in the centrosymmetric cubic superconductor Ti4Ir2O, which strongly violates the Pauli paramagnetic limit. Combining DFT band-structure calculations with a symmetry-derived k·p Hamiltonian around the X points, the authors identify a nonsymmorphic-symmetry-protected anomalous pseudospin structure: along certain momentum lines the effective Zeeman coupling vanishes for specific field orientations. They further find a Van Hove singularity (VHS) near the chemical potential that contributes about 65% of the total DOS at its peak. Using a previously derived formula for the Pauli limiting field hP/h0, they obtain an analytic enhancement hP/h0 = e for ellipsoidal Fermi surfaces and numerical enhancements of 2–3 when a VHS is present. The paper proposes that the combination of strong SOC and enhanced DOS near the X points explains the observed large critical fields and predicts a field-orientation anisotropy and a momentum-dependent gap suppression.

Significance. If the quantitative mechanism holds, the paper provides a general symmetry-based explanation for Pauli-limit violations in centrosymmetric cubic materials, which is currently unusual and important for the field. The symmetry argument for vanishing g-factors on anomalous pseudospin lines is robust and elegantly generalizes the authors' earlier work, and the analytic hP/h0 = e result for ellipsoidal Fermi surfaces is a useful parameter-free benchmark. The paper also makes falsifiable experimental predictions (anisotropic paramagnetic response and field-induced momentum-dependent gap suppression). However, the numerical enhancement factor of 2–3 relies on the chemical potential being at or very near the VHS and on higher-order k·p parameters that are chosen rather than independently fitted; moreover, no absolute upper critical field is computed for direct comparison with the measured Bc2(0). These gaps currently limit the paper to a plausible mechanism rather than a fully quantitative explanation.

major comments (3)
  1. [DFT calculations and Fig. 1(c)] The quantitative support for the mechanism hinges on the VHS being near the chemical potential, but Fig. 1(c) shows that the pronounced 65% DOS peak is at about -13 meV relative to the DFT Fermi energy, and the paper does not report the X-band contribution to the DOS actually at E_F. Since the computed enhancement hP/h0 of 2–3 in Fig. 4 is obtained for the chemical potential at or near the VHS, the paper needs to evaluate hP/h0 at the DFT chemical potential and for modest shifts (e.g., ±5–15 meV) to demonstrate that the stoichiometric material indeed lies in the enhanced regime. The suggestion that doping, vacancies, or pressure may move the VHS closer is a speculation, not a demonstration, and without this check the explanation of the observed Pauli-limit violation remains conditional.
  2. [Supplemental Material Sec. II and Fig. 5] The higher-order k·p parameters that produce the VHS and the factor-2–3 enhancement are not independently determined. The text states, 'For Fig. 5 VHS, we set λ~'_z = −3, λ~''_z = 0.2, and λ~'_y = −0.04,' while the DFT fits in Supplemental Sec. I determine only the quadratic parameters (ℏ²/2m, γ, t1) and the linear SOC parameters (λy, λz). Because the VHS shape, the locations of vanishing-g-factor regions, and the resulting hP/h0 strongly depend on these third-order coefficients, the numerical enhancement is not a parameter-free prediction. The authors should either fit these parameters to the DFT band structure (as done for the lower-order terms) or show that the enhancement persists over a physically reasonable range of these parameters.
  3. [Eqs. (4)–(5) and Discussion] The paper computes only the ratio hP/h0 and never compares an absolute upper critical field with the experimentally observed Bc2(0) values from Refs. [9,15]. Since the central claim is that this mechanism 'provides the origin of the observed enhanced critical field,' a quantitative check would require estimating h0 (e.g., from the measured Tc and the normal-state Sommerfeld coefficient) and showing that the predicted hP is consistent with the measured Bc2(0). Without this step, the factor-2–3 enhancement is a plausibility argument rather than a quantitative explanation. The authors should include such a comparison or clearly state why the ratio alone is sufficient.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and DFT calculations] The statement that the VHS 'accounts for ~65% of the total density of states' should be clarified to indicate that this is the peak value at the VHS energy (-13 meV), not necessarily the value at the DFT Fermi energy; the text currently blurs this distinction.
  2. [Eq. (5)] The quantities t_{1,k} and t_{2,k} in the effective g-factor formula are not defined in the main text; the authors should define them in terms of the momentum-dependent terms of Eq. (1) to avoid confusion.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption states that the X3(0,0,1) panel can be obtained by exchanging labels, but this panel is not displayed; including it would make the claimed symmetry and the 'blue belts' easier for the reader to verify.
  4. [Discussion, FFLO paragraph] The brief discussion contrasting the proposed momentum-dependent gap suppression with the FFLO interpretation of Ref. [28] would benefit from one sentence on how the two scenarios can be distinguished experimentally (e.g., by the presence or absence of a spatially modulated order parameter).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Pauli-enhancement mechanism is derived from a symmetry-based k.p model with DFT-fitted parameters, and the cited Pauli-limit formula from prior same-group work is an independent derivation, not a fit to the observed upper critical field.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, that symmetry-enforced anomalous pseudospin near the X points reduces the effective g-factor and thereby enhances the Pauli limiting field, is not circular. The k.p Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) is constructed from the Fd3m symmetry of the X4 irreducible representation, and its low-order parameters are fitted to the DFT band structure (Supplemental Sec. I), not to the observed upper critical field. The Van Hove singularity and the roughly 65% density-of-states statement come from DFT (Fig. 1(c)), and the negative sign and large magnitude of lambda'_z are also inferred from DFT. The Pauli-limit formula Eq. (4) is taken from Refs. [19,26], which are prior papers with overlapping authorship; however, that formula is a parameter-free analytic result with stated assumptions (isotropic s-wave pairing and a Fermi-surface average of the effective g-factor) and does not encode the Ti4Ir2O critical-field data, so it qualifies as independent support under the review rules. The Fig. 5 parameters (e.g., lambda'_z = -3) are illustrative choices made to expose the Van Hove singularity Fermi surface rather than fits to Bc2; this weakens the quantitative force of the factor-2 to 3 enhancement, but it is a robustness or correctness concern, not circularity. The final predictions, namely anisotropic paramagnetic response and field-driven momentum-dependent gap suppression, follow from the symmetry-derived g-factor structure and are not restatements of the input data. No equation in the paper reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on the symmetry-derived kp Hamiltonian and on the Pauli-limiting formula from prior work. The quantitative results depend on parameters fitted to DFT bands and on three hand-picked higher-order SOC coefficients. No new particles or forces are introduced; 'anomalous pseudospin' is a descriptor of Bloch spin texture from the authors' earlier work, with a falsifiable handle through the predicted anisotropy of the Pauli response.

free parameters (9)
  • hbar^2/2m = 0.97 eV A^2
    Fitted to the DFT band curvature around the X point in Supplemental Fig. S1; used in epsilon_0,k.
  • gamma^2 (beta = gamma^2) = 8.58 (gamma = 2.97)
    Fitted to DFT band dispersion; controls ellipsoidal versus hyperboloidal Fermi surface and VHS appearance.
  • t1 = 1.30 eV A^2
    Fitted to DFT; enters the kz*kx sublattice hopping term in Eq. (1).
  • lambda_y = 0.75 eV A
    k-linear spin-orbit coefficient along ky, from the slope of the DFT band splitting in Fig. S1.
  • lambda_z = 0.15 eV A
    k-linear spin-orbit coefficient along kx and kz, from DFT.
  • tilde_lambda'_z = -3 (dimensionless)
    Hand-picked in Supplemental Material II for Fig. 5 to place the VHS in the plotted range; not determined by DFT fits.
  • tilde_lambda''_z = 0.2 (dimensionless)
    Hand-picked for Fig. 5; controls cubic SOC corrections.
  • tilde_lambda'_y = -0.04 (dimensionless)
    Hand-picked for Fig. 5; controls ky^3 SOC correction.
  • chemical potential relative to VHS = ~13 meV above VHS in DFT; placed at VHS for Fig. 4
    The claimed 65% DOS and maximal Pauli-field enhancement depend on the chemical potential sitting near the VHS; experimental off-stoichiometry makes this uncertain.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Ti4Ir2O is an isotropic s-wave superconductor
    Stated in the main text: 'For an isotropic s-wave superconductor, which we assume to be the case for Ti4Ir2O'. The Pauli-limiting formula Eq. (4) and the momentum-dependent gap suppression argument rest on this.
  • domain assumption The Pauli-limiting formula of Refs. [19] and [26] applies to this system
    Eqs. (4)-(5) are taken, not re-derived, from two prior papers by the same group. The central enhancement numbers inherit any validity limits of that formula, such as neglect of orbital pair breaking or multiband effects.
  • domain assumption The relevant low-energy states near X belong to the X4 irreducible representation
    The kp Hamiltonian Eq. (1) is constructed only for X4 states. If other IRs contribute to the Fermi surface, the model omits them.
  • standard math Non-symmorphic Fd-3m symmetry protects the nodal lines and gives the anomalous pseudospin
    The statement (T M2,hat n)^2 = -1 is a standard space-group and anti-unitarity argument; the paper cites the Bilbao server and Ref. [19].
  • domain assumption GGA-DFT captures the relevant band structure and VHS position
    The FLAPW-GGA calculation determines the VHS, 65% DOS, and kp parameters; no comparison with experiment or beyond-GGA methods is provided.
  • domain assumption Superconductivity is dominated by the X-centered bands 161-164
    The paper proposes this based on the 65% DOS, but the remaining 35% has g~1 and may affect Hc2 and the gap suppression.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large critical fields in superconducting Ti$_{4}$Ir$_2$O from spin-orbit coupling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BLKBWW7T

@misc{pith2026241109793,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large critical fields in superconducting Ti$_4$Ir$_2$O from spin-orbit coupling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BLKBWW7T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09793}
}
abstract

The recently synthesized $\eta$-carbide-type superconductors exhibit large critical fields. A notable example is Ti$_4$Ir$_2$O, for which the upper critical field strongly violates the Pauli paramagnetic limit, behavior that is unusual for cubic materials that preserve inversion symmetry. Here, by combining density functional theory (DFT) and analytic modeling, we provide an explanation for this enhanced Pauli limiting field. We show that the nonsymmorphic Fd$\overline{3}$m symmetry implies that the electronic states near the X points exhibit strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC), which leads to a vanishing effective $g$-factor and enables the enhanced Pauli limiting field. Furthermore, our DFT results reveal a Van Hove singularity (VHS) peak near the X points, accounting for $\sim$65\% of the total density of states (DOS), occurring near the chemical potential. We propose that the strong SOC and enhanced DOS in the vicinity of the X points provide the origin of the observed enhanced critical field. This leads to a prediction that the magnetic field will lead to a strongly momentum-dependent gap suppression. The gap due to electronic states away from (near to) the X points will be rapidly (slowly) suppressed by fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09793 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Energy band dispersion near the chemical potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Fermi surfaces of bands 161-164, illustrating the distinct topological changes as the chemical potential is lowered. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The enhancement of the Pauli field for ellipsoidal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The enhancement of the Pauli field and the DOS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Lifshitz transitions and reduced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    H. G. Suh, Y. Yu, T. Shishidou, M. Weinert, P. M. R. Brydon, and D. F. Agterberg, Superconductivity of anomalous pseudospin in nonsymmorphic materials, Physical Review Research 5, 033204 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    Okuno, A

    K. Okuno, A. Shikov, and N. Koizumi, Superconducting magnet system in a fusion reactor, Journal of Nuclear Materials 329, 141 (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [2]

    G. R. Stewart, Superconductivity in the A15 structure, Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 514, 28 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [3]

    Banno, Low-temperature superconductors: Nb 3Sn, Nb3Al, and NbTi, Superconductivity 6, 100047 (2023)

    N. Banno, Low-temperature superconductors: Nb 3Sn, Nb3Al, and NbTi, Superconductivity 6, 100047 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [4]

    Taylor and K

    A. Taylor and K. Sachs, A New Complex Eta-Carbide, Nature 169, 411 (1952)

    work page 1952

  6. [5]

    Kuo, The formation of η carbides, Acta metallurgica 1, 301 (1953)

    K. Kuo, The formation of η carbides, Acta metallurgica 1, 301 (1953)

    work page 1953

  7. [6]

    Mackay, G

    R. Mackay, G. J. Miller, and H. F. Franzen, New oxides of the filled-Ti 2Ni type structure, Journal of alloys and compounds 204, 109 (1994)

    work page 1994

  8. [7]

    K. Ma, J. Lago, and F. O. von Rohr, Superconductivity in theη-carbide-type oxides Zr4Rh2Ox, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 796, 287 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 33 references
  1. [8]

    Watanabe, A

    Y. Watanabe, A. Miura, C. Moriyoshi, A. Yamashita, and Y. Mizuguchi, Observation of superconductivity and enhanced upper critical field of η-carbide-type oxide Zr4Pd2O, Scientific Reports 13, 22458 (2023)

    2023

  2. [9]

    K. Ma, R. Lef` evre, K. Gornicka, H. O. Jeschke, X. Zhang, Z. Guguchia, T. Klimczuk, and F. O. von Rohr, Group- vi 9 Transition-Metal Suboxides Adopting the Filled-Ti 2Ni Structure: A Class of Superconductors Exhibiting Excep- tionally High Upper Critical Fields, Chemistry of ...

    2021

  3. [10]

    Chandrasekhar, A NOTE ON THE MAXIMUM CRITICAL FIELD OF HIGH-FIELD SUPERCON- DUCTORS, Applied Physics Letters 1, 7 (1962)

    B. Chandrasekhar, A NOTE ON THE MAXIMUM CRITICAL FIELD OF HIGH-FIELD SUPERCON- DUCTORS, Applied Physics Letters 1, 7 (1962)

    1962

  4. [11]

    A. M. Clogston, Upper Limit for the Critical Field in Hard Superconductors, Physical Review Letters 9, 266 (1962)

    1962

  5. [12]

    G. Sarma, On the influence of a uniform exchange field acting on the spins of the conduction electrons in a su- perconductor, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 24, 1029 (1963)

    1963

  6. [13]

    Maki and T

    K. Maki and T. Tsuneto, Pauli paramagnetism and su- perconducting state, Progress of Theoretical Physics 31, 945 (1964)

    1964

  7. [14]

    K. Ma, K. Gornicka, R. Lef` evre, Y. Yang, H. M. Rønnow, H. O. Jeschke, T. Klimczuk, and F. O. von Rohr, Super- conductivity with High Upper Critical Field in the Cubic Centrosymmetric η-Carbide Nb 4Rh2C1−δ, ACS Materi- als Au 1, 55 (2021)

    2021

  8. [15]

    Ruan, M.-H

    B.-B. Ruan, M.-H. Zhou, Q.-S. Yang, Y.-D. Gu, M.-W. Ma, G.-F. Chen, and Z.-A. Ren, Superconductivity with a Violation of Pauli Limit and Evidences for Multigap in η-Carbide Type Ti 4Ir2O, Chinese Physics Letters 39, 027401 (2022)

    2022

  9. [16]

    L. Shi, B. Ruan, P. Yang, N. Wang, P. Shan, Z. Liu, J. Sun, Y. Uwatoko, G. Chen, Z. Ren, B. Wang, and J. Cheng, Pressure-driven evolution of upper critical field and Fermi surface reconstruction in the strong-coupling superconductor Ti4Ir2O, Physical Review B 107, 174525 (2023)

    2023

  10. [17]

    I. M. Lifshitz, Anomalies of electron characteristics of a metal in the high pressure region, Sov. Phys. JETP 11, 1130 (1960)

    1960

  11. [18]

    Y. M. Blanter, M. I. Kaganov, A. V. Pantsulaya, and A. A. Varlamov, The theory of electronic topological transitions, Physics Reports 245, 159 (1994)

    1994

  12. [20]

    Weinert, G

    M. Weinert, G. Schneider, R. Podloucky, and J. Redinger, FLAPW: applications and implemen- tations, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 21, 084201 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Physical Review Letters 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  14. [22]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, D. Orobengoa, E. Tasci, G. de la Flor, and A. Kirov, Crystallography online: Bil- bao Crystallographic Server, Bulg. Chem. Commun 43, 183 (2011)

    2011

  15. [23]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, C. Capillas, E. Kroumova, S. Ivantchev, G. Madariaga, A. Kirov, and H. Won- dratschek, Bilbao Crystallographic Server: I. Databases and crystallographic computing programs, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials 221, 15 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    M. I. Aroyo, A. Kirov, C. Capillas, J. Perez-Mato, and H. Wondratschek, Bilbao Crystallographic Server. II. Representations of crystallographic point groups and space groups, Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foun- dations of Crystallography 62, 115 (2006)

    2006

  17. [25]

    Elcoro, B

    L. Elcoro, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, J. Cano, C. Felser, B. A. Bernevig, D. Orobengoa, G. Flor, and M. I. Aroyo, Double crystallographic groups and their representations on the Bilbao Crystallographic Server, Journal of Applied Crystallography 50, 1457 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    D. C. Cavanagh, D. F. Agterberg, and P. M. R. Bry- don, Pair breaking in superconductors with strong spin- orbit coupling, Physical Review B 107, 10.1103/phys- revb.107.l060504 (2023)

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher]

  20. [28]

    J. Hu, Y. H. Ng, O. Atanov, B.-B. Ruan, Z.-A. Ren, and R. Lortz, Thermodynamic evidence for the Fulde-Ferrell- Larkin Ovchinnikov state in the isotropic superconductor Ti4Ir2O , arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.01914 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Fulde and R

    P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell, Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field, Phys. Rev. 135, A550 (1964)

    1964

  22. [30]

    Larkin and Y

    A. Larkin and Y. Ovchinnikov, Inhomogeneous state of superconductors, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 762 (1965)

    1965

  23. [31]

    Barzykin, Magnetic-field-induced gapless state in multiband superconductors, Physical Review B 79, 134517 (2009)

    V. Barzykin, Magnetic-field-induced gapless state in multiband superconductors, Physical Review B 79, 134517 (2009)

    2009

  24. [32]

    Barzykin and L

    V. Barzykin and L. P. Gor’kov, Gapless fermi surfaces of anisotropic multiband superconductors in a magnetic field, Physical review letters 98, 087004 (2007)

    2007

  25. [33]

    Kawamura, Fermisurfer: Fermi-surface viewer provid- ing multiple representation schemes, Computer Physics Communications 239, 197 (2019)

    M. Kawamura, Fermisurfer: Fermi-surface viewer provid- ing multiple representation schemes, Computer Physics Communications 239, 197 (2019). Supplemental Material for Large critical fields in superconducting Ti 4Ir2O from spin-orbit coupling Hao Wu,1 Tatsuya Shishidou,1 Michae...

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.