Radiative corrections to one- and two-meson tau decays for precise new physics tests

Pablo Roig

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 56 references

Radiative corrections to one- and two-meson tau decays for precise new physics tests

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the pion-based tau lepton-universality ratio agrees with the Standard Model at one sigma once the structure-dependent radiative corrections are computed with lowest-lying large-$N_c$ resonance form factors, while the…

desk verdict A faithful review of already-published radiative corrections, with one real gap: the model-uncertainty estimate for the vSD piece does not test the extended-Lagrangian alternative, which could shift the pion LU conclusion. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09799 v1 pith:GZPNFDUQ submitted 2024-11-14 hep-ph

Pablo Roig This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-ph

keywords taudecaysradiativecorrectionsleptonflavouruniversalityCKMunitaritynon-standardinteractionschiralperturbationtheorylarge-NcQCDhadronicformfactors

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a proceedings review that consolidates a corrected set of radiative corrections for tau decays into one or two mesons and applies them to precision tests. Its central result is that the apparent 1.5–2 $\sigma$ deviation from lepton flavour universality in the pion channel disappears once the structure-dependent virtual photon correction is treated consistently: the total correction is $\delta R_{\tau/\pi} = (+0.18 \pm 0.57)\%$, giving $|g_\tau/g_\mu|_\pi = 0.9964 \pm 0.0038$, in agreement with the Standard Model at one $\sigma$. In the kaon channel the improved correction $\delta R_{\tau/K} = (+0.97 \pm 0.58)\%$ leaves $|g_\tau/g_\mu|_K = 0.9857 \pm 0.0078$, a 1.8-$\sigma$ deviation that is statistically dominated. The same framework updates two-meson radiative corrections, halving previous uncertainties in the $K\pi$ channels, and sharpens Cabibbo-unitarity and non-standard-interaction bounds.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the pair of structure-dependent hadronic form factors $F_V^P(q^2,k^2)$ and $F_A^P(q^2,k^2)$ of Eq. (1), built from the lowest-lying vector and axial-vector resonances in the large-$N_c$ limit of QCD. These form factors encode the hadronic response to the virtual photon that closes the loop in $\tau \to P \nu_\tau[\gamma]$, and they are constrained so that two- and three-point Green functions have the ultraviolet behaviour demanded by QCD asymptotics. The calculation combines this virtual structure-dependent piece with the structure-independent short-distance electroweak correction, the real-photon radiation part, and the corresponding corrections in the $P \to \mu \nu_\mu[\gamma]$ denominator. Model uncertainty is estimated by comparing short-distance constraints obtained from two-point versus three-point Green functions, an error that turns out to be subdominant. For two-meson decays the same framework uses dispersive form factors and yields the radiative corrections listed in Eq. (8).

What would settle it

A direct test would extract the axial-vector form factor $F_A^P$ from high-statistics real-photon spectra in $\tau \to \pi \nu_\tau \gamma$ decays, or compute it on the lattice at the relevant virtualities, and compare with Eq. (1). If an independent determination shifts the virtual structure-dependent correction by more than about $0.6\%$, the pion lepton-universality conclusion moves by more than one $\sigma$. Conversely, a future tau factory that reduces the statistical error on $R_{\tau/\pi}$ below roughly $0.2\%$ would probe the same correction directly without model input.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the long-standing tension in $R_{\tau/\pi} = \Gamma(\tau \to \pi \nu_\tau[\gamma])/\Gamma(\pi \to \mu \nu_\mu[\gamma])$ was not new physics but an artifact of incomplete radiative corrections. When the virtual structure-dependent part is evaluated with the lowest-lying large-$N_c$ resonance form factors, it is $(-1.02 \pm 0.57)\%$ in the pion ratio, opposite in sign to the structure-independent part, and the total correction collapses to $(+0.18 \pm 0.57)\%$. The extracted ratio $|g_\tau/g_\mu|_\pi = 0.9964 \pm 0.0038$ agrees with the Standard Model at one $\sigma$; for kaons the total correction is $(+0.97 \pm 0.58)\%$, and the resulting $|g_\tau/g_\mu|_K = 0.9857 \pm 0.0078$ remains 1.8 $\sigma$ below unity, limited mostly by measurement statistics. The earlier estimate had used a cutoff regulator that split long- and short-distance physics artificially, which the author argues is the source of the apparent anomaly.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on the assumption that the lowest-lying, large-$N_c$ resonance form factors $F_V^P$ and $F_A^P$ in Eq. (1) capture the true hadronic structure of the virtual photon correction, so that higher resonances and chiral-symmetry-breaking effects contribute less than the quoted $\pm 0.57\%$ uncertainty.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The pion-based lepton-universality test no longer indicates new physics: with $\delta R_{\tau/\pi} = (+0.18 \pm 0.57)\%$, $|g_\tau/g_\mu|_\pi = 0.9964 \pm 0.0038$ agrees with the Standard Model at one sigma.
The kaon-based ratio stays $1.8\sigma$ from unity, so any residual deviation is dominated by measurement statistics; improved tau data would decide whether it persists.
Tau-decay Cabibbo-unitarity tests remain statistically limited: $|V_{us}/V_{ud}| = 0.2288 \pm 0.0020$ ($2.1\sigma$) and $|V_{us}| = 0.2220 \pm 0.0018$ ($2.6\sigma$), about three times less precise than the kaon-semileptonic determinations.
Non-standard-interaction constraints from one-meson tau decays imply new-physics scales beyond roughly $3$ TeV for Standard-Model-strength couplings, complementing kaon-based limits.
Two-meson tau-decay radiative corrections, such as $\delta R_{K^-\pi^0} = -0.009^{+0.010}_{-0.118}\%$, halve previous uncertainties in the $K\pi$ modes and update the corresponding new-physics bounds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the pion tension was indeed a radiative-correction artifact, other tau-decay observables computed with the old cutoff-regularized corrections could shift by similar amounts when re-evaluated with the new form-factor treatment.
Should the kaon $1.8\sigma$ residual survive with improved statistics, the next suspect is the model dependence of $F_A^P$ rather than new physics; measuring that form factor in $\tau \to \pi \nu_\tau \gamma$ would discriminate.
The two-point-versus-three-point short-distance comparison used to estimate the model uncertainty could be applied channel by channel to the two-meson decays, testing whether the errors quoted in Eq. (8) are realistic.
A lattice-QCD calculation of the axial-vector form factor at the loop virtualities would provide the first non-model check of the central radiative-correction values reported here.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a conference proceedings, not a new calculation. It reviews radiative corrections to one- and two-meson tau decays that were published by Roig and collaborators in PRD and JHEP, and it summarizes their implications for lepton universality, CKM unitarity, and NSI. If you know those papers, there is nothing new here. If you don't, this is a compact and accurate survey. The central numbers are correctly restated, and the paper is clear about which results come from where. The fact that the corrections are already incorporated into HFLAV tells you the underlying calculations have survived external scrutiny.

What the paper does well: it lays out the decomposition of the radiative correction into SI, rSD, and vSD pieces, shows the cancellation between SI and vSD for the pion case, and presents the phenomenological consequences without overstating them. The footnote admitting that the published CKM-ratio uncertainty is 'extremely conservative' because it neglects correlations is a good example of honest reporting.

The soft spots are mostly minor. The novelty is low, as expected for a proceedings. There is a typo in Section 7.1 where δ_τ/π is printed twice; the second should be δ_τ/K. That should be fixed.

The stress-test note raises a more substantive point. The central pion LU result relies on a near-total cancellation between SI (+1.05%) and vSD (−1.02%). The model uncertainty on the vSD piece is estimated in Section 4 by comparing two-point versus three-point Green-function constraints, both computed with the same lowest-lying large-Nc form factors. The extended-resonance Lagrangian of refs. [29,33] is used in footnote 1 to estimate the uncertainty on the CKM ratio, but not on the individual δR values. The concern is that the extended Lagrangian could shift the vSD contribution by ~0.3–0.4%, which would move the pion LU test from 'within 1σ' to around 1.5σ. This is a legitimate gap in the presentation. It may not be a physics flaw—the original papers presumably discuss the model dependence in more detail, and the quoted ±0.57% uncertainty on δR is already large—but a reader of this review cannot check that. The author should add a sentence pointing to where this is addressed, or explicitly apply the same cross-check to δR.

That said, the paper is honest, coherent, and useful. It is aimed at tau phenomenologists and anyone using HFLAV averages for precision SM tests. It deserves a serious referee, mainly to check the review's accuracy and the model-uncertainty discussion, and to see that the typo is fixed.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This proceedings paper reviews radiative corrections to one- and two-meson tau decays, focusing on the one-meson ratio R_{τP} = Γ(τ→Pντ[γ])/Γ(P→μνμ[γ]). It reports the corrections δR_{τ/π} = (+0.18 ± 0.57)% and δR_{τ/K} = (+0.97 ± 0.58)% (Table 2), and applies them to tests of lepton flavor universality, CKM unitarity, and non-standard interactions. The main result is that the pion-based LU ratio becomes consistent with unity at the one-sigma level, while the kaon-based ratio remains 1.8σ away. Two-meson radiative corrections are summarized from ref. [2], with the claim that they halve the previous uncertainties for the Kπ modes.

Significance. If the central values of these radiative corrections are correct, the paper resolves the previously reported 1.5–2σ tension in the pion-based lepton-universality test, which is an important step for low-energy new-physics searches. The results have already been incorporated into the HFLAV'22 averages, indicating practical impact. The paper is a concise review; its strength is that the numerical results are backed by peer-reviewed publications [7,8,2] and that the author explicitly discloses the conservative nature of one uncertainty estimate (footnote 1). The main weakness is that the model-dependent part of the one-meson corrections is not demonstrated in the manuscript itself, and the reader is asked to trust refs. [7,8] for the central vSD-uncertainty estimate.

major comments (2)

[Section 4; Table 2; Eq. (1)] The uncertainty on the structure-dependent virtual (vSD) correction is estimated by comparing short-distance constraints from two-point vs three-point Green functions, but both calculations use the same lowest-lying large-N_c resonance form factors of Eq. (1). This does not test the assumption that higher-resonance and chiral-symmetry-breaking corrections are negligible. Footnote 1 uses the extended resonance Lagrangian [29,33] as a complementary error estimate for the CKM ratio δ, but no analogous result is reported for δR. Since δR_{τ/π}=+0.18±0.57% arises from the near cancellation between the +1.05% SI and −1.02% vSD contributions, a plausible shift of the vSD piece by ~0.4% would increase the pion LU deviation from unity above 1σ. Please provide the extended-Lagrangian check for δR (if available) or explicitly state in Section 8 that the 'within one sigma' conclusion relies on the lowest-lying resonance model.
[Section 4] The author states 'We will find that this error is subdominant' but does not show the numerical comparison in this manuscript. Because the vSD uncertainty dominates the total uncertainty in Table 2, the paper should present the two-point vs three-point difference (or give a specific equation/table reference in refs. [7,8]) so that the reader can assess the quoted uncertainty.

minor comments (2)

[Section 7.1] In the sentence 'with δ_{τπ}= (−0.24 ± 0.56)% and δ_{τπ}= (−0.15 ± 0.57)%', the second subscript should be τK rather than τπ; the subscripts are repeated.
[Section 8; Eq. (8)] The claim that the Kπ two-meson radiative corrections 'halve previous uncertainties' would be easier to verify if the previous uncertainty values were quoted alongside Eq. (8).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the radiative corrections are computed from an effective Lagrangian with short-distance constraints and applied to independent data.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the sense required for a circularity finding. The central radiative corrections δRτ/π and δRτ/K are taken from the author's prior calculations [7,8], which evaluate the structure-dependent part from a large-Nc resonance effective Lagrangian with short-distance constraints on two- and three-point Green functions (Section 4, Eq. (1)). No parameter in that calculation is fitted to the lepton-universality ratios that the paper then tests; the LU, CKM-unitarity, and NSI results use independent PDG and HFLAV branching-ratio inputs in Eqs. (3), (5), and (6). The quoted shifts in |gτ/gμ| and |Vus| follow numerically from the computed δR values, not from a fit to those observables. The two-meson RadCors in Eq. (8) are obtained from dispersive form factors of the non-radiative decays and are not defined in terms of the corrected rates. Heavy self-citation is present, but the cited papers contain explicit peer-reviewed calculations with stated assumptions that do not include the target results, and the text also checks against external results such as the Decker–Finkemeier structure-independent piece and the Cirigliano–Rosell leptonic decay corrections. The acknowledged model-uncertainty limitations—two-point versus three-point short-distance constraints, and the footnote's alternative Lagrangian-difference estimate for the CKM ratio—are robustness concerns about the size of the quoted error, not instances of a result reducing to its own input by construction. No step in the paper exhibits the specific reduction that circularity requires.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The radiative corrections in this review rest on effective-field-theory assumptions from prior literature: chiral perturbation theory with resonances, large-Nc truncation, and short-distance QCD constraints. No new particles or ad hoc parameters are introduced. The only hand-chosen quantity entering the error budget is the loop renormalization scale μ, whose variation dominates the quoted uncertainty of the vSD corrections.

free parameters (1)

renormalization scale μ for loop integrals = not explicitly stated; varied to estimate uncertainty
The uncertainty in the structure-dependent virtual correction is dominated by the μ-dependence of the loop integrals (Sec. 5); the central values depend on the renormalization scheme and scale choice.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Chiral Perturbation Theory with resonances (RχT) is a valid effective theory for tau decays
Invoked in Sections 2 and 4 for computing structure-dependent radiative corrections.
domain assumption The large-Nc limit with only lowest-lying resonance multiplets provides a good approximation for form factors and short-distance behavior
Used in Section 4 to justify truncating the resonance spectrum and to formulate the form factors in Eq. (1).
domain assumption Short-distance behavior of two- and three-point Green functions must match QCD parton picture
Used in Section 4 to constrain counterterms and form factors and to estimate model uncertainty.
standard math The structure-independent radiative correction (Kinoshita) and the short-distance electroweak correction (Sirlin/Marciano) are applicable and factorizable
Background results adopted in Section 3 for the P→ℓν decays.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Radiative corrections to one- and two-meson tau decays for precise new physics tests." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GZPNFDUQ

@misc{pith2026241109799,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Radiative corrections to one- and two-meson tau decays for precise new physics tests},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GZPNFDUQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09799}
}

abstract

We review the radiative corrections to the $\tau \to P (P) \nu_\tau [\gamma]$ decays and their implications for several SM tests: lepton universality, CKM unitarity and non-standard interactions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

[2]

Escribano, J

R. Escribano, J. A. Miranda and P. Roig, `` Radiative corrections to the ^- (P_1 P_2)^-(P_ 1,2 = ,K) _ decays s,'' Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.5, 053003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.053003, [arXiv:2303.01362 [hep-ph]]

arXiv 2024
[1]

Pich, ``Precision Tau Physics,'' Prog

A. Pich, ``Precision Tau Physics,'' Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 75 (2014), 41-85, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.11.002, [arXiv:1310.7922 [hep-ph]]

arXiv 2014
[3]

Sirlin, ``Current Algebra Formulation of Radiative Corrections in Gauge Theories and the Universality of the Weak Interactions,'' Rev

A. Sirlin, ``Current Algebra Formulation of Radiative Corrections in Gauge Theories and the Universality of the Weak Interactions,'' Rev. Mod. Phys. 50 (1978), 573, [erratum: Rev. Mod. Phys. 50 (1978), 905], doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.50.573

doi:10.1103/revmodphys.50.573 1978
[4]

W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, ``Electroweak Radiative Corrections to tau Decay,'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988), 1815-1818, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1815

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.1815 1988
[5]

R. L. Workman et al. [Particle Data Group], ``Review of Particle Physics,'' PTEP 2022 (2022), 083C01, doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097

doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097 2022
[6]

Decker and M

R. Decker and M. Finkemeier, ``Short and long distance effects in the decay tau -> pi tau-neutrino (gamma),'' Nucl. Phys. B 438 (1995), 17-53, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00597-L, [arXiv:hep-ph/9403385 [hep-ph]]

arXiv 1995
[7]

M. A. Arroyo-Ure\ na, G. Hern\'andez-Tom\'e, G. L\'opez-Castro, P. Roig and I. Rosell, `` Radiative corrections to (K) _ [ ] : A reliable new physics test ,'' Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) no.9, L091502, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L091502, [arXiv:2107.04603 [hep-ph]]

arXiv 2021
[8]

M. A. Arroyo-Ure\ na, G. Hern\'andez-Tom\'e, G. L\'opez-Castro, P. Roig and I. Rosell, ``One-loop determination of (K) _ [ ] branching ratios and new physics tests,'' JHEP 02 (2022), 173, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2022)173, [arXiv:2112.01859 [hep-ph]]

arXiv 2022

Show all 56 references

[9]

Cirigliano, G

V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker and H. Neufeld, ``Isospin violation and the magnetic moment of the muon,'' Phys. Lett. B 513 (2001), 361-370, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00764-X, [arXiv:hep-ph/0104267 [hep-ph]]

2001 arXiv
[10]

Cirigliano, G

V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker and H. Neufeld, ``Radiative tau decay and the magnetic moment of the muon,'' JHEP 08 (2002), 002, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/002, [arXiv:hep-ph/0207310 [hep-ph]]

2002 arXiv
[11]

Flores-B\'aez, A

F. Flores-B\'aez, A. Flores-Tlalpa, G. L\'opez Castro and G. Toledo S\'anchez, ``Long-distance radiative corrections to the di-pion tau lepton decay,'' Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006), 071301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.071301, [arXiv:hep-ph/0608084 [hep-ph]]

2006 arXiv
[12]

J. A. Miranda and P. Roig, ``New -based evaluation of the hadronic contribution to the vacuum polarization piece of the muon anomalous magnetic moment,'' Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), 114017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.114017, [arXiv:2007.11019 [hep-ph]]

2020 arXiv
[13]

Antonelli, V

M. Antonelli, V. Cirigliano, A. Lusiani and E. Passemar, `` Predicting the strange branching ratios and implications for V_ us ,'' JHEP 10 (2013), 070, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)070, [arXiv:1304.8134 [hep-ph]]

2013 arXiv
[14]

F. V. Flores-Ba\'ez and J. R. Morones-Ibarra, ``Model Independent Electromagnetic corrections in hadronic decays,'' Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) no.7, 073009, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.073009, [arXiv:1307.1912 [hep-ph]]

2013 arXiv
[15]

Albrecht, D

J. Albrecht, D. van Dyk and C. Langenbruch, ``Flavour anomalies in heavy quark decays,'' Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120 (2021), 103885, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103885, [arXiv:2107.04822 [hep-ex]]

2021
[16]

Bryman, V

D. Bryman, V. Cirigliano, A. Crivellin and G. Inguglia, ``Testing Lepton Flavor Universality with Pion, Kaon, Tau, and Beta Decays,'' Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72 (2022), 69-91, doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-110121-051223, [arXiv:2111.05338 [hep-ph]]

2022 arXiv
[17]

Y. S. Amhis et al. [HFLAV], ``Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and -lepton properties as of 2018,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) no.3, 226, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8156-7, [arXiv:1909.12524 [hep-ex]]

2021 arXiv
[18]

Y. S. Amhis et al. [HFLAV], ``Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and \ -lepton properties as of 2021,'' Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) no.5, 052008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.052008, [arXiv:2206.07501 [hep-ex]]

2023 arXiv
[19]

Aad et al

G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], ``Test of the universality of and lepton couplings in W -boson decays with the ATLAS detector,'' Nature Phys. 17 (2021) no.7, 813-818, doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01236-w, [arXiv:2007.14040 [hep-ex]]

2021 arXiv
[20]

Tumasyan et al

A. Tumasyan et al. [CMS], `` Precision measurement of the W boson decay branching fractions in proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV ,'' Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) no.7, 072008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.072008, [arXiv:2201.07861 [hep-ex]]

2022 arXiv
[21]

Weinberg, ``Phenomenological Lagrangians,'' Physica A 96 (1979) no.1-2, 327-340, doi:10.1016/0378-4371(79)90223-1

S. Weinberg, ``Phenomenological Lagrangians,'' Physica A 96 (1979) no.1-2, 327-340, doi:10.1016/0378-4371(79)90223-1

1979 doi
[22]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, ``Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop,'' Annals Phys. 158 (1984), 142, doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90242-2

1984 doi
[23]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, ``Chiral Perturbation Theory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark,'' Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985), 465-516, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90492-4

1985 doi
[24]

Kinoshita, ``Radiative corrections to pi - e decay,'' Phys

T. Kinoshita, ``Radiative corrections to pi - e decay,'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 2 (1959), 477, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.2.477

1959 doi
[25]

Cirigliano and I

V. Cirigliano and I. Rosell, ``Two-loop effective theory analysis of pi (K) -> e anti-nu/e [gamma] branching ratios,'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007), 231801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.231801, [arXiv:0707.3439 [hep-ph]]

2007 arXiv
[26]

Cirigliano and I

V. Cirigliano and I. Rosell, ``pi/K -> e anti-nu(e) branching ratios to O(e**2 p**4) in Chiral Perturbation Theory,'' JHEP 10 (2007), 005, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/10/005, [arXiv:0707.4464 [hep-ph]]

2007 arXiv
[27]

Ecker, J

G. Ecker, J. Gasser, A. Pich and E. de Rafael, ``The Role of Resonances in Chiral Perturbation Theory,'' Nucl. Phys. B 321 (1989), 311-342, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90346-5

1989 doi
[28]

Ecker, J

G. Ecker, J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, A. Pich and E. de Rafael, ``Chiral Lagrangians for Massive Spin 1 Fields,'' Phys. Lett. B 223 (1989), 425-432, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91627-4

1989 doi
[29]

Cirigliano, G

V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, M. Eidemuller, R. Kaiser, A. Pich and J. Portoles, ``Towards a consistent estimate of the chiral low-energy constants,'' Nucl. Phys. B 753 (2006), 139-177, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.07.010, [arXiv:hep-ph/0603205 [hep-ph]]

2006 arXiv
[30]

Z. H. Guo and P. Roig, ``One meson radiative tau decays,'' Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010), 113016, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.113016, [arXiv:1009.2542 [hep-ph]]

2010 arXiv
[31]

Guevara, G

A. Guevara, G. L\'opez Castro and P. Roig, ``Weak radiative pion vertex in ^- ^- _ ^+ ^- decays,'' Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) no.3, 033007, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.033007, [arXiv:1306.1732 [hep-ph]]

2013 arXiv
[32]

Guevara, G

A. Guevara, G. L. Castro and P. Roig, ``Improved description of dilepton production in ^- _ P^- decays,'' Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) no.7, 076007, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.076007, [arXiv:2111.09994 [hep-ph]]

2022 arXiv
[33]

Kampf and J

K. Kampf and J. Novotny, ``Resonance saturation in the odd-intrinsic parity sector of low-energy QCD,'' Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011), 014036, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.014036, [arXiv:1104.3137 [hep-ph]]

2011 arXiv
[34]

Roig and J

P. Roig and J. J. Sanz Cillero, ``Consistent high-energy constraints in the anomalous QCD sector,'' Phys. Lett. B 733 (2014), 158-163, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.04.034, [arXiv:1312.6206 [hep-ph]]

2014 arXiv
[35]

J. C. Hardy and I. S. Towner, `` Superallowed 0^+ 0^+ nuclear decays: 2020 critical survey, with implications for V _ ud and CKM unitarity ,'' Phys. Rev. C 102 (2020) no.4, 045501, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.045501

2020 doi
[36]

C. Y. Seng, D. Galviz, W. J. Marciano and U. G. Mei ner, ``Update on |Vus| and |Vus/Vud| from semileptonic kaon and pion decays,'' Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) no.1, 013005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.013005, [arXiv:2107.14708 [hep-ph]]

2022 arXiv
[37]

Cirigliano, J

V. Cirigliano, J. Jenkins and M. Gonz\'alez-Alonso, ``Semileptonic decays of light quarks beyond the Standard Model,'' Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010), 95-115, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2009.12.020, [arXiv:0908.1754 [hep-ph]]

2010 arXiv
[38]

Cirigliano, A

V. Cirigliano, A. Falkowski, M. Gonz\'alez-Alonso and A. Rodr\' guez-S\'anchez, `` Hadronic Decays as New Physics Probes in the LHC Era ,'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) no.22, 221801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.221801, [arXiv:1809.01161 [hep-ph]]

2019 arXiv
[39]

Gonz\`alez-Sol\' s, A

S. Gonz\`alez-Sol\' s, A. Miranda, J. Rend\'on and P. Roig, ``Exclusive hadronic tau decays as probes of non-SM interactions,'' Phys. Lett. B 804 (2020), 135371, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135371, [arXiv:1912.08725 [hep-ph]]

2020
[40]

Cirigliano, D

V. Cirigliano, D. D\' az-Calder\'on, A. Falkowski, M. Gonz\'alez-Alonso and A. Rodr\' guez-S\'anchez, ``Semileptonic tau decays beyond the Standard Model,'' JHEP 04 (2022), 152, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2022)152, [arXiv:2112.02087 [hep-ph]]

2022 arXiv
[41]

Aoki et al

Y. Aoki et al. [Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)], ``FLAG Review 2021,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) no.10, 869, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1, [arXiv:2111.09849 [hep-lat]]

2022 arXiv
[42]

G\'omez Dumm and P

D. G\'omez Dumm and P. Roig, ``Dispersive representation of the pion vector form factor in _ decays,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) no.8, 2528, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2528-1, [arXiv:1301.6973 [hep-ph]]

2013 arXiv
[43]

Gonz\`alez-Sol\' s and P

S. Gonz\`alez-Sol\' s and P. Roig, `` A dispersive analysis of the pion vector form factor and ^ - K^ - K_ S _ decay ,'' Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) no.5, 436, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6943-9, [arXiv:1902.02273 [hep-ph]]

2019 arXiv
[44]

Jamin, J

M. Jamin, J. A. Oller and A. Pich, ``Strangeness changing scalar form-factors,'' Nucl. Phys. B 622 (2002), 279-308, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00605-8, [arXiv:hep-ph/0110193 [hep-ph]]

2002 arXiv
[45]

Escribano, S

R. Escribano, S. Gonz\`alez-Sol\'is and P. Roig, `` ^- K^- ^ ( ) _ decays in Chiral Perturbation Theory with Resonances ,'' JHEP 10 (2013), 039, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)039, [arXiv:1307.7908 [hep-ph]]

2013 arXiv
[46]

Escribano, S

R. Escribano, S. Gonz\'alez-Sol\' s, M. Jamin and P. Roig, `` Combined analysis of the decays ^ - K_ S ^ - _ and ^ - K^ - _ ,'' JHEP 09 (2014), 042, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2014)042, [arXiv:1407.6590 [hep-ph]]

2014 arXiv
[47]

Escribano, S

R. Escribano, S. Gonz\`alez-Sol\'is and P. Roig, `` Predictions on the second-class current decays ^ - ^ - ^ ( ) _ ,'' Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) no.3, 034008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.034008, [arXiv:1601.03989 [hep-ph]]

2016 arXiv
[48]

Guevara, G

A. Guevara, G. L\'opez-Castro and P. Roig, `` ^- ^ ( ) ^- _ decays as backgrounds in the search for second class currents ,'' Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) no.5, 054015, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.054015, [arXiv:1612.03291 [hep-ph]]

2017 arXiv
[49]

J. L. Guti\'errez Santiago, G. L\'opez Castro and P. Roig, ``Lepton-pair production in dipion lepton decays,'' Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) no.1, 014027, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014027, [arXiv:2012.01587 [hep-ph]]

2021 arXiv
[50]

E. A. Garc\'es, M. Hern\'andez Villanueva, G. L\'opez Castro and P. Roig, `` Effective-field theory analysis of the ^- ^ ( ) ^- _ decays ,'' JHEP 12 (2017), 027, doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2017)027, [arXiv:1708.07802 [hep-ph]]

2017 arXiv
[51]

Cirigliano, A

V. Cirigliano, A. Crivellin and M. Hoferichter, ``No-go theorem for nonstandard explanations of the K_S _ CP asymmetry,'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) no.14, 141803, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.141803, [arXiv:1712.06595 [hep-ph]]

2018 arXiv
[52]

J. A. Miranda and P. Roig, ``Effective-field theory analysis of the ^- ^- ^0 _ decays,'' JHEP 11 (2018), 038, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)038, [arXiv:1806.09547 [hep-ph]]

2018 arXiv
[53]

Rend\'on, P

J. Rend\'on, P. Roig and G. Toledo S\'anchez, `` Effective-field theory analysis of the ^ - (K )^ - _ decays ,'' Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) no.9, 093005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.093005, [arXiv:1902.08143 [hep-ph]]

2019 arXiv
[54]

Gonz\`alez-Sol\' s, A

S. Gonz\`alez-Sol\' s, A. Miranda, J. Rend\'on and P. Roig, `` Effective-field theory analysis of the ^ - K^ - ( ^ ( ) ,K^ 0 ) _ decays ,'' Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) no.3, 034010, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.034010, [arXiv:1911.08341 [hep-ph]]

2020 arXiv
[55]

Masjuan, A

P. Masjuan, A. Miranda and P. Roig, `` data-driven evaluation of Euclidean windows for the hadronic vacuum polarization,'' Phys. Lett. B 850 (2024), 138492, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138492, [arXiv:2305.20005 [hep-ph]]

2024
[56]

G. L. Castro, A. Miranda and P. Roig, ``Isospin breaking corrections in 2 production in tau decays and e^+e^- annihilation: consequences for the muon g-2 and CVC tests,'' [arXiv:2411.07696 [hep-ph]]

arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [2]

Escribano, J

R. Escribano, J. A. Miranda and P. Roig, `` Radiative corrections to the ^- (P_1 P_2)^-(P_ 1,2 = ,K) _ decays s,'' Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.5, 053003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.053003, [arXiv:2303.01362 [hep-ph]]

arXiv 2024

[2] [1]

Pich, ``Precision Tau Physics,'' Prog

A. Pich, ``Precision Tau Physics,'' Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 75 (2014), 41-85, doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.11.002, [arXiv:1310.7922 [hep-ph]]

arXiv 2014

[3] [3]

Sirlin, ``Current Algebra Formulation of Radiative Corrections in Gauge Theories and the Universality of the Weak Interactions,'' Rev

A. Sirlin, ``Current Algebra Formulation of Radiative Corrections in Gauge Theories and the Universality of the Weak Interactions,'' Rev. Mod. Phys. 50 (1978), 573, [erratum: Rev. Mod. Phys. 50 (1978), 905], doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.50.573

doi:10.1103/revmodphys.50.573 1978

[4] [4]

W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, ``Electroweak Radiative Corrections to tau Decay,'' Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988), 1815-1818, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1815

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.1815 1988

[5] [5]

R. L. Workman et al. [Particle Data Group], ``Review of Particle Physics,'' PTEP 2022 (2022), 083C01, doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097

doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097 2022

[6] [6]

Decker and M

R. Decker and M. Finkemeier, ``Short and long distance effects in the decay tau -> pi tau-neutrino (gamma),'' Nucl. Phys. B 438 (1995), 17-53, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00597-L, [arXiv:hep-ph/9403385 [hep-ph]]

arXiv 1995

[7] [7]

M. A. Arroyo-Ure\ na, G. Hern\'andez-Tom\'e, G. L\'opez-Castro, P. Roig and I. Rosell, `` Radiative corrections to (K) _ [ ] : A reliable new physics test ,'' Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) no.9, L091502, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L091502, [arXiv:2107.04603 [hep-ph]]

arXiv 2021

[8] [8]

M. A. Arroyo-Ure\ na, G. Hern\'andez-Tom\'e, G. L\'opez-Castro, P. Roig and I. Rosell, ``One-loop determination of (K) _ [ ] branching ratios and new physics tests,'' JHEP 02 (2022), 173, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2022)173, [arXiv:2112.01859 [hep-ph]]

arXiv 2022