Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 3 cited by

Anomalous-Hall Neel textures in altermagnetic materials

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that in altermagnets the anomalous Hall vector as a function of the Néel vector is fixed by the equivalent nonmagnetic point group, producing exactly ten textures in four families: Rashba-like, Dresselhaus-like…

desk verdict Solid symmetry classification of anomalous Hall textures for two-sublattice altermagnets, but the 'all altermagnets' claim is overreaching. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10147 v3 pith:WZWGKFHO submitted 2024-11-15 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Rui-Chun Xiao , Hui Li , Hui Han , Wei Gan , Mengmeng Yang , Ding-Fu Shao , Shu-Hui Zhang , Yang Gao
show 2 more authors
Mingliang Tian Jianhui Zhou
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords anomalousHalleffectaltermagnetsNéelvectoranomalous-HalltexturesspinmagneticsymmetryBerrycurvaturemagneto-opticaleffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the anomalous Hall effect in altermagnets is not a simple mirror of magnetization: the anomalous Hall vector $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H$ depends on the Néel vector $\mathbf{n}$ in a limited set of ways, and symmetry alone decides which one a material exhibits. Treating $\mathbf{n}$ as an extrinsic parameter rather than part of the magnetic space group, the authors expand $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H(\mathbf{n})$ in powers of $\mathbf{n}$ and find that every altermagnet falls into one of ten textures in four families: Rashba-like, Dresselhaus-like, mixed Rashba–Dresselhaus, and pure cubic. They verify the analytical forms with tight-binding calculations for rutile, calcite, NiAs-type, and perovskite altermagnets. If right, this gives a complete pictorial classification of altermagnets by transport response and a direct recipe for reading the Néel vector from Hall measurements.

What carries the argument

The extrinsic-parameter method: treat the Néel vector $\mathbf{n}$ as an external unit vector and expand $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H(\mathbf{n}) = \mathbf{T}^{(2)}\cdot\mathbf{n} + \mathbf{T}^{(4)}\vdots\mathbf{nnn} + \cdots$, where $\mathbf{T}^{(2)}$ and $\mathbf{T}^{(4)}$ are axial tensors constrained by the nonmagnetic space group. Space-group operations act on $\mathbf{n}$ with a $\pm$ sign encoding whether the two opposite-spin sublattices are exchanged, and on $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H$ as $\det(R)D(R)$; the resulting invariant polynomials are enumerated by an automated routine. This reduces the classification to second- and fourth-rank axial tensors under the ten non-centrosymmetric non-chiral point groups, and the analogy to spin textures follows because $\boldsymbol{\Omega}(\mathbf{k})$ in the spin-orbit Hamiltonian obeys the same axial-tensor constraints with $\mathbf{k}$ playing the role of $\mathbf{n}$.

What would settle it

Find or construct a confirmed altermagnet whose equivalent point group is not in the ten listed groups (for example a chiral altermagnet with point group $222$ or $422$), or measure $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H(\mathbf{n})$ on a single-domain sample and observe a component of the anomalous Hall vector along the Néel vector; either observation would refute the claimed completeness and the traceless-$\mathbf{T}^{(2)}$ rule.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the relation $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H(\mathbf{n})$ is fixed by the equivalent nonmagnetic point group of the altermagnet, not by the full magnetic group, and that for fully compensated collinear two-sublattice altermagnets this produces exactly ten allowed textures. For point groups $3m$, $4mm$, and $6mm$ the texture is Rashba-like, $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H = A(n_y, -n_x, 0)$; for $\bar{4}$, $\bar{4}2m$, and $\bar{4}m2$ it is Dresselhaus-like; for $m$ and $mm2$ it is a mixed texture with two independent first-order coefficients; and for $6$, $\bar{6}m2$, and $\bar{4}3m$ the linear term vanishes, leaving a cubic texture $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H = \mathbf{T}^{(4)} \vdots \mathbf{nnn}$. A radial term $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H \parallel \mathbf{n}$ is forbidden because $\mathbf{T}^{(2)}$ is traceless. The authors also exhibit the symmetry origin: $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H$ is an axial vector just like the spin-orbit field $\boldsymbol{\Omega}(\mathbf{k})$, while $\mathbf{n}$ behaves like a polar vector, so the AHNTs mirror the familiar spin textures of nonmagnetic inversion-breaking crystals.

Load-bearing premise

The whole classification is only as complete as the assertion that every altermagnet is a fully compensated collinear two-sublattice antiferromagnet whose equivalent nonmagnetic point group belongs to the ten non-centrosymmetric non-chiral groups listed here.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A material's AHNT type is determined entirely by its equivalent point group, so the angular profile of the anomalous Hall conductivity is predictable before any detailed band-structure calculation.
  • Measuring $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H(\mathbf{n})$ over different Néel-vector orientations can identify the Néel vector, because the texture maps $\mathbf{n}$ to $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H$ in an analytically known way.
  • Radial textures with $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H$ parallel to $\mathbf{n}$ cannot occur in altermagnets, marking a sharp contrast with ferromagnets.
  • Known altermagnets split into four texture families, with examples such as RuO$_2$ (Dresselhaus-like), MnTe and CrSb (pure cubic), calcite-type carbonates (Rashba-like), and $Pnma$ perovskites (mixed).
  • The same extrinsic-parameter reasoning extends to other magnetically related effects, including magneto-optical, spin Hall, and nonlinear Hall responses, as the paper explicitly notes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Our inference: if the classification is as complete as claimed, a high-throughput search could screen altermagnet candidates by point group alone and assign each to one of the ten textures without computing Berry curvature.
  • Our inference: the mapping should also hold for optical Hall conductivity spectra, so each AHNT type should carry a characteristic frequency-dependent signature that could be tested by Kerr or Faraday measurements on a single-domain crystal.
  • Our inference: because the linear coefficient vanishes for the cubic-texture groups, materials like MnTe should show a strongly nonlinear $\boldsymbol{\sigma}_H(\mathbf{n})$ with a $\sin 3\varphi$ angular pattern; a low-field measurement revealing a sizeable linear term in such a material would signal either a different magnetic order or higher-sublattice effects beyond the two-sublattice model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces an 'extrinsic parameter' method to derive the symmetry-allowed dependence of the anomalous Hall vector σ_H on the Néel vector n in altermagnets. Expanding σ_H(n) as a Taylor series and constraining the expansion tensors by the nonmagnetic space group with a sublattice-exchange sign, the authors obtain a classification of ten 'anomalous-Hall Néel textures' (AHNTs) in four categories (Rashba-like, Dresselhaus-like, mixed, cubic), and verify the predicted angular forms by tight-binding calculations for rutile, calcite, NiAs, and perovskite-type altermagnets. They also establish a formal analogy between AHNTs and momentum-space spin textures and discuss applications for Néel vector detection and magneto-optical isolation.

Significance. If the classification is complete, the paper provides a useful symmetry tabulation that fixes the angular form of the AHE for any altermagnet solely from its equivalent nonmagnetic point group, with practical implications for Néel vector readout. Strengths include a transparent symmetry-constrained tensor expansion, a publicly posted computational implementation (AHE-texture), and explicit tight-binding verification for several material families, which is a creditable consistency check of the algebra and code.

major comments (2)
  1. [Supplementary Note 4, Tables I and S3] The claimed 'non-centrosymmetric and non-chiral' list of ten point groups includes point group 4, which is chiral: it lacks improper operations and appears in the paper's own list of 11 chiral groups in the same Note. This is not a local typo, because Table I and Table S3 assign a Dresselhaus-like AHNT to group 4. The completeness argument rules out chiral groups because a fully compensated two-sublattice order requires an equivalent operation with det(R)=-1; a proper 4-fold rotation cannot provide that. The correct non-centrosymmetric non-chiral tetragonal group should be 4bar (S4). The authors should either relabel their group-4 entries as 4bar with the appropriate tensor forms, or justify how an equivalent point group of type 4 can arise from the exchange sign. As written, the central classification is internally inconsistent.
  2. [Supplementary Note 4 and main text Section 3.1] The completeness of the 'all altermagnets' claim is asserted rather than proven. The argument assumes that every fully compensated collinear altermagnet is described by two opposite-spin sublattices with a single Néel vector and that the equivalent point group must contain an operation with det(R)=-1. This excludes or leaves unexamined multi-sublattice collinear orders and altermagnets defined via spin-space groups, where the operation connecting opposite spins may not be a lattice operation. The authors should either present a rigorous proof of the reduction to the ten groups for all altermagnets, or explicitly restrict the classification to two-sublattice collinear altermagnets with a single Néel vector, which would preserve the listed examples but weaken the headline universality claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Conclusions] The abstract and the Conclusions mention 'persistent' AHNTs, but the classification in Table I contains no persistent category; the mixed texture explicitly imposes A ≠ ±B, so the persistent case is not among the ten types. Please reconcile the terminology or remove the unclassified reference.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption of Fig. 4 states that the solid lines are fitted by Eq. (7), while the text and the displayed formulas refer to Eq. (8) for the perovskite-type configurations. The equation number in the caption should be corrected.
  3. [Supplementary Note 6.1] The Kubo-Greenwood formula in Eq. (S25) is poorly typeset with ambiguous notation (primes and braces); please rewrite it cleanly and define all symbols, including the integration variable and the spectral integral used in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the AHNT classification is obtained from symmetry-constrained Taylor expansions with undetermined coefficients, and the TB-model agreement is a self-consistency check rather than a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. sigma_H(n) is expanded as an odd Taylor series (Eq. 2), and every space-group operation is applied to sigma_H as an axial vector (Eq. 4) and to n with a sublattice-exchange sign (Eq. 5); the invariant tensor components then follow by requiring Eq. (1) to hold. The coefficients A, B, ... are left as undetermined material parameters, so no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The ten-type classification follows from enumerating non-centrosymmetric non-chiral point groups under the stated two-sublattice compensation premise in Supplementary Note 4; that premise is asserted rather than proved and may be a correctness risk for multi-sublattice or spin-group-defined altermagnets, but it is not a circular reduction. The effective TB models are built with the same space-group symmetries as the materials they represent, and the numerical data are fitted to the derived functional forms; this confirms internal consistency of the algebra and code, not an independent empirical test. The author self-citations (Refs. [33] and [74]) are not load-bearing: Table S8 reproduces standard magnetic point-group results, and Ref. [74] is cited only as an extension of the method. No step in the derivation relies on the conclusion it is supposed to establish.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its new concepts (AHNT, extrinsic parameter method) are analytical tools. The central classification rests on standard symmetry group theory plus the domain assumption of two-sublattice collinear order, and on the asserted completeness of the 10-point-group enumeration.

free parameters (2)
  • A, B and higher coefficients in Eqs. (7), (8), (46), (51) = undetermined by symmetry
    Symmetry-allowed constants in the Taylor expansion of sigma_H(n); their values are material-specific and are fitted to the TB data in the verification plots, not predicted.
  • TB hopping and SOC parameters (e.g., t, lambda, m, t1, t2, r1-r3) = listed in Supplementary Notes 6-7
    Hand-picked parameters for the effective two-band s-orbital models used to illustrate the texture shapes; the central classification does not depend on these values.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption sigma_H is an axial vector that is odd under time reversal; only odd powers of n appear in the expansion.
    Used to restrict Eq. (2) to odd terms; standard Onsager relation.
  • domain assumption The Néel vector transforms as +/- det(R) D(R) n under {R|t}.
    Eq. (5); captures sublattice exchange via the +/- sign.
  • domain assumption Altermagnets are fully compensated collinear antiferromagnets describable by a single unit Néel vector.
    Section 2: |n|=1 and two opposite-spin sublattices; excludes multi-sublattice or canted cases.
  • ad hoc to paper Every altermagnet's equivalent point group is one of the 10 non-centrosymmetric non-chiral point groups.
    Supplementary Note 4; the completeness claim relies on ruling out chiral equivalent point groups and all other non-centrosymmetric groups. This is the load-bearing premise for 'all altermagnets'.
  • domain assumption The Taylor expansion of sigma_H(n) converges and truncation at third order suffices for the classification.
    Eq. (2); justified by SOC being a perturbation, but higher-order terms could distort the textures quantitatively.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalous-Hall Neel textures in altermagnetic materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WZWGKFHO

@misc{pith2026241110147,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalous-Hall Neel textures in altermagnetic materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WZWGKFHO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10147}
}
read the original abstract

Recently, the altermagnets, a new kind of collinear antiferromagnet with nearly zero net magnetization and momentum-dependent spin-splitting of bands, have sparked great interest. Despite simple magnetic structures, these altermagnets exhibit intriguing and intricate dependence of anomalous Hall effect (AHE) on the N\'eel vector, in contrast to the conventional perpendicular configuration of Hall current with magnetization in ferromagnets. However, the fundamental relationship between the AHE and the N\'eel vector remains largely elusive. Here, we reveal all the unconventional anomalous Hall textures in the N\'eel vector space, dubbed anomalous-Hall N\'eel textures (AHNTs) for altermagnets. Specifically, we identify 10 types across four categories of AHNTs for all altermagnets. Notably, we find that AHNTs resemble the known spin textures in momentum space, and further reveal their symmetry origin. Meanwhile, we examine our key discoveries in prototypical altermagnets. Our work offers a thorough understanding of AHE in altermagnets and a complete and pictorial classification of altermagnets based on the geometry of response functions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nanoscale Imaging of Strain-Controlled Altermagnetic Domains in {\alpha}-MnTe

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In alpha-MnTe, compression makes magnetic domains grow by merging, and unloading leaves them fragmented in a different, metastable pattern, so the material remembers the strain history.

  2. Rigid-Body Anisotropy in Noncollinear Antiferromagnets

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper derives a spin-group representation framework that expresses magnetic anisotropy and anomalous Hall anisotropy in noncollinear antiferromagnets as polynomial expansions in a spin-orbit vector, demonstrating ...

  3. Quasi-symmetry Constrained Spin Ferromagnetism in Altermagnets

    cond-mat.str-el 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A SOC-enabled uniaxial spin space-group quasi-symmetry determines whether the weak ferromagnetic moment induced in altermagnets is linear, quadratic, or cubic in spin-orbit coupling, explaining the material-dependent ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    W. Peng, Z. Liu, H. Pan, P. Wang, Y. Chen, J. Zhang, X. Yu, J. Shen, M. Yang, Q. Niu et al. Observation of the In-plane Anomalous Hall Effect induced by Octupole in Magnetization Space, arXiv:2402.15741 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    H. Pan, H. Li, J. Huang, Z. Liu, M. Fang, Y. Yuan, D. Liu, X. Hu, W. Peng, Z. Liang et al. Orthogonal Geometry of Magneto -Optical Kerr Effect Enabled by Magnetization Multipole of Berry Curvature, arXiv:2412.09857 (2024)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Z. Liu, M. Wei, D. Hou, Y. Gao, and Q. Niu Multipolar Anisotropy in Anomalous Hall Effect from Spin-Group Symmetry Breaking, arXiv:2408.08810 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    S. V. Gallego, J. Etxebarria, L. Elcoro, E. S. Tasci, and J. M. Perez- Mato Automatic calculation of symmetry-adapted tensors in magnetic and non -magnetic materials: a new tool of the Bilbao Crystallographic Server, Acta Crystallogr. A Found Adv. 75, 438 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Železný, H

    J. Železný, H. Gao, A. Manchon, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov, J. Zemen, J. Mašek, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth Spin- orbit torques in locally and globally noncentrosymmetric crystals: Antiferromagnets and ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 95, 014403 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    L. L. Tao and E. Y. Tsymbal Perspectives of spin- textured ferroelectrics, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54 , 113001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Mera Acosta, L

    C. Mera Acosta, L. Yuan, G. M. Dalpian, and A. Zunger Different shapes of spin textures as a journey through the Brillouin zone, Phys. Rev. B 104, 104408 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Y. Guo, H. Liu, O. Janson, I. C. Fulga, J. van den Brink, and J. I. Facio Spin- split collinear antiferromagnets: A large-scale ab-initio study, Matter. Today Phys. 32, 100991 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Xiaobing Chen, Yuntian Liu, Pengfei Liu, Yutong Yu, J. L. Jun Ren, Ao Zhang, and Q. Liu Catalog of Unconventional Magnons in Collinear Magnets, arXiv:2307.12366, (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu Quantum Nonlinear Hall Effect Induced by Berry Curvature Dipole in Time - Reversal Invariant Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Xiao, D.-F

    R.-C. Xiao, D.-F. Shao, W. Huang, and H. Jiang Electrical detection of ferroelectriclike metals through the nonlinear Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 102, 024109 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Z. Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie Nonlinear Hall effects, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 744 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    M. T. Suzuki, T. Koretsune, M. Ochi, and R. Arita Cluster multipole theory for anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094406 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Yatsushiro, H

    M. Yatsushiro, H. Kusunose, and S. Hayami Multipole classification in 122 magnetic point groups for unified understanding of multiferroic responses and transport phenomena, Phys. Rev. B 104, 054412 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin Ferroically Ordered Magnetic Octupoles in d- Wave Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011019 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Zhang, Z.-M

    Z. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, G.-B. Liu, and Y. Yao MagneticTB: A package for tight-binding model of magnetic and non-magnetic materials, Comput. Phys. Commun. 270, 108153 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Šmejkal, R

    L. Šmejkal, R. González- Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova Crystal time -reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6 , eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    M. e. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg Minimal Models for Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144412 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Šmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. González -Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin et al. An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron. 5, 735 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Minár, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kutnyakhov, N. Wind et al. Observation of time-reversal symmetry breaking in the band structure of altermagnetic RuO 2, Sci. Adv. 10, eadj4883 (2024). 28

    2024

  15. [23]

    D. F. Shao, S. H. Zhang, M. Li, C. B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal Spin -neutral currents for spintronics, Nat. Commun. 12, 7061 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, X. Yang, G.- Y. Guo, and Y. Yao Crystal chirality magneto- optical effects in collinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 104, 024401 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zubáč, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. Šobáň, G. Springholz, K. Olejník, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth et al. Spontaneous Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from an Unconventional Compensated Magnetic Phase in a Semiconductor, Phys. Rev...

    2023

  19. [27]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. Šmejkal et al. Broken Kramers Degeneracy in Altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. Šmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty et al. Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nat. Commun. 15, 2116 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu et al. Large Band Splitting in g-Wave Altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206401 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau Landau Theory of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 176702 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Hariki, A

    A. Hariki, A. Dal Din, O. J. Amin, T. Yamaguchi, A. Badura, D. Kriegner, K. W. Edmonds, R. P. Campion, P. Wadley, D. Backes et al. X-Ray Magnetic Circular Dichroism in Altermagnetic α -MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 176701 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    O. J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Zakharov, S. C. Fromage, C. J. B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R. B. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi et al. Nanoscale imaging and control of altermagnetism in MnTe, Nature 636, 348 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    R.-C. Xiao, D. -F. Shao, W. Gan, H.- W. Wang, H. Han, Z. G. Sheng, C. Zhang, H. Jiang, and H. Li Classification of second harmonic generation effect in magnetically ordered materials, npj Quantum Mater. 8, 62 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.