A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems | Paper Citation Record

Observation 920e22b0-b511-4fa0-9bb0-fdcba7f8d4f1 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 1

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.490065Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 003457cb-3353-4cee-81ee-dd0a61c28f43 · outbound

This paper cites recommend action.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems recommend action

Reference 2

Resolution: malformed identifier; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.493959Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e82ef016-a4ad-4ea2-9a35-8622cfdc4293 · outbound

This paper cites - 40% of the time, the predictor will have incorrectly predicted you'd two-box and left box B empty.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems - 40% of the time, the predictor will have incorrectly predicted you'd two-box and left box B empty

Reference 3

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.507520Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 36358759-bcf4-40a5-b0c0-6ab5fad2ed91 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 4

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.512458Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3aa09ac2-9d00-4ccb-b947-485cdd46d239 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.517019Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 737f16b1-656d-4b33-a2f5-7f197c90ba63 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 6

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.499383Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation cb0dd1e8-46b7-48ae-ac55-402ba8e84ce8 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.503396Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation bc1347ba-d054-4507-801d-dc8efe9d0490 · outbound

This paper cites Therefore, EDT would recommend the action that provides evidence for the highest total payoff, which in this case is a2.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Therefore, EDT would recommend the action that provides evidence for the highest total payoff, which in this case is a2

Reference 8

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.793938Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation a03ee966-d957-4587-8631-24c38998454b · outbound

This paper cites But if Alice believes the predictor is slightly less accurate, say 59%, then: A1 = $590,000 B1 = $590,000 - ε (where ε is a small positive number).

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems But if Alice believes the predictor is slightly less accurate, say 59%, then: A1 = $590,000 B1 = $590,000 - ε (where ε is a small positive number)

Reference 9

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.664750Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation d30a0c27-c018-49c4-bcbd-57391d5bbe24 · outbound

This paper cites Therefore, it is indeed possible for A1 to be greater than B1, depending on Alice's beliefs about the predictor's accuracy.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Therefore, it is indeed possible for A1 to be greater than B1, depending on Alice's beliefs about the predictor's accuracy

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.644473Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation fe15f81b-62d2-431c-87f9-d09f50054aa2 · outbound

This paper cites 38 FINAL ANSWER: A.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems 38 FINAL ANSWER: A

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.521676Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3fbfeacf-59c8-4cdc-b0c7-007ef982ef0d · outbound

This paper cites CDT suggests that we should choose the action that maximizes expected utility based on the causal consequences of our actions.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems CDT suggests that we should choose the action that maximizes expected utility based on the causal consequences of our actions

Reference 12

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.525588Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation c74e07c3-3bc3-4cdd-813c-b7a57fc56f07 · outbound

This paper cites The money is already placed before we make our choice.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems The money is already placed before we make our choice

Reference 13

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:32.083859Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 20252fd0-2392-46b6-81d9-43b79b6ac91b · outbound

This paper cites - If we choose C or D, there's an 80% chance the money is in the envelope we chose.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems - If we choose C or D, there's an 80% chance the money is in the envelope we chose

Reference 14

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:32.069697Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 461d739e-6c1c-48dd-a798-1da3e3b9afe2 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 15

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:32.055343Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 7a0ce0b8-0022-4023-9666-6baed393c1dd · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 16

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:32.041546Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation e188ec70-e6ac-40a6-9f42-c7f284aa7d0e · outbound

This paper cites The expected value is the same for both.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems The expected value is the same for both

Reference 17

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:32.027145Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation dc7219c0-ddbf-4829-8332-3d111c33e8bf · outbound

This paper cites 39 Given this reasoning, the answer that best aligns with CDT's recommendations is C: CDT suggests that we should be indifferent between C and D and prefer these over A and B.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems 39 Given this reasoning, the answer that best aligns with CDT's recommendations is C: CDT suggests that we should be indifferent between C and D and prefer these over A and B

Reference 18

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:32.013261Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 2f693ddf-b4c5-452a-b43d-b430060cb024 · outbound

This paper cites CDT advises choosing the action that maximizes expected utility, based on the causal consequences of that action.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems CDT advises choosing the action that maximizes expected utility, based on the causal consequences of that action

Reference 19

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.997715Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 6a36c567-3878-404b-8a6a-f3e7a126bda9 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 20

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.976670Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 7681376c-92bb-43d2-a2f0-d4245c03cc3c · outbound

This paper cites This creates a correlation, but not a causal relationship.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems This creates a correlation, but not a causal relationship

Reference 21

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.956066Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 0c054449-8f44-4f75-84bb-eed36a701d88 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 22

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.939617Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 06d9137a-e68b-410a-8363-efc1727464c1 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 23

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.921576Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 8b155c78-0a88-4543-b3c7-60653a2e1ce8 · outbound

This paper cites Towards the Scalable Evaluation of Cooperativeness in Language Models.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Towards the Scalable Evaluation of Cooperativeness in Language Models

Reference 24

Resolution: metadata mismatch; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.908598Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation b872ccc2-791f-45b3-9a60-42fbdc285767 · outbound

This paper cites It only considers the causal effects of Alice's action on her own payoff.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems It only considers the causal effects of Alice's action on her own payoff

Reference 25

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.907024Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation f2bba3b5-dd5b-44f4-867e-a2a455fd1bab · outbound

This paper cites EDT suggests choosing the action that, if you learned you had chosen it, would give you the best news about the outcome.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems EDT suggests choosing the action that, if you learned you had chosen it, would give you the best news about the outcome

Reference 26

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.894060Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 96469550-870f-4971-bf8f-538e6bf655b0 · outbound

This paper cites This suggests that Alice's choice is likely to be correlated with Bob's choice.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems This suggests that Alice's choice is likely to be correlated with Bob's choice

Reference 27

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.881399Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 5aeeff23-4df4-4b9e-8c73-61b2efdbc6d6 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 28

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.866619Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 993d55c3-8aeb-4195-a8ac-16575995bbf0 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 29

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.852139Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 8db07964-74d0-4817-a253-aa6539eee7bd · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 30

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.837372Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 15335c93-f16c-4933-9890-1a29c143d575 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 31

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.823090Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 8525c7e5-a077-4920-a82e-5ca611189f9a · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 32

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.808692Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 29730642-a035-4b34-b7e0-c321c360d54a · outbound

This paper cites - Evidential decision theory (EDT) typically recommends one-boxing.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems - Evidential decision theory (EDT) typically recommends one-boxing

Reference 33

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.780359Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation cf7e1fb5-d284-465e-b19c-9c59808c6359 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 34

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.765745Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation f422d69c-ba7f-4902-9bfe-0be97f8f8d58 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 35

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.751575Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation d0cefd62-43b6-4e40-96eb-f556dd4e7dc7 · outbound

This paper cites - The causal expected payoff (A1 and A2) would still favor two-boxing, as it always does.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems - The causal expected payoff (A1 and A2) would still favor two-boxing, as it always does

Reference 36

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.730731Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation e2b6b1bd-fb5c-43ac-9292-cc17e6c157dc · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 37

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.714530Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 91498fc8-20d8-4df4-a6e3-8e8bf31277bd · outbound

This paper cites This could happen if Alice believes the predictor has some accuracy, but not enough to make one-boxing evidentially better than two-boxing.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems This could happen if Alice believes the predictor has some accuracy, but not enough to make one-boxing evidentially better than two-boxing

Reference 38

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.698719Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation ba548928-1d98-4141-b56e-5940a10b467c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 39

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.682193Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation e4192028-9ca5-4ec9-83d9-d1fec6629799 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 42

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.625700Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 6472efe0-1c7d-47fe-a744-4fe19e633f38 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 43

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.609419Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation e20eefd5-6f62-4326-9829-0b3b2a57a4e3 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 44

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.594192Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation a8a6822a-7969-4a1a-9051-fc985b2ea305 · outbound

This paper cites - So, if you choose a1, you'd expect your copies to also choose a1.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems - So, if you choose a1, you'd expect your copies to also choose a1

Reference 45

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.580977Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation bc1d2c3f-3834-4a61-bdf6-42b30d2085a3 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 46

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.562132Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation f93d953a-d4e3-4dc2-ae3f-5c01eb6b8789 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 47

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.544524Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 08a81e2d-c33f-41de-b2d7-f83cd0acace2 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 48

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.529192Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 21125c42-dc21-4bee-8b77-0a6452727eaf · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 49

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.514532Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation c48cfb1d-2648-48ff-94cf-e97cdb726720 · outbound

This paper cites Therefore, in this problem, evidential decision theory does not recommend the policy that maximizes social welfare.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Therefore, in this problem, evidential decision theory does not recommend the policy that maximizes social welfare

Reference 50

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.501935Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation d60bfc95-2034-4b6b-9385-c86845c22677 · outbound

This paper cites CDT makes decisions based on the causal consequences of actions, not on evidential correlations.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems CDT makes decisions based on the causal consequences of actions, not on evidential correlations

Reference 51

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.489582Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 0a7b44ae-9c11-46c5-9ca5-cd40f84acd33 · outbound

This paper cites Her prediction and the money placement happened in the past, before the agent makes a decision.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Her prediction and the money placement happened in the past, before the agent makes a decision

Reference 52

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.474382Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 6a7ce954-2134-49fd-8b6b-acf58a2c737f · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 53

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.457762Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 668118fb-120a-4130-968b-884ca008165f · outbound

This paper cites The placement of money is already determined.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems The placement of money is already determined

Reference 54

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.441689Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 07b901c6-5ce7-4898-b0ae-5d9d388c84a1 · outbound

This paper cites Clearly, choosing C or D has a higher expected value ($80) than choosing A or B ($20).

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Clearly, choosing C or D has a higher expected value ($80) than choosing A or B ($20)

Reference 55

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.424000Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 4ad546f2-4116-44c6-98dd-3d7d439a5634 · outbound

This paper cites Given this reasoning, CDT would indeed prefer one of C and D over one of A and B.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Given this reasoning, CDT would indeed prefer one of C and D over one of A and B

Reference 56

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.407584Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 3cbf306b-14a6-4d5c-a6a5-2bf29587c88b · outbound

This paper cites This indicates that Alice prefers a safer, lower-payoff option over a potentially higher-payoff but riskier option that requires cooperation.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems This indicates that Alice prefers a safer, lower-payoff option over a potentially higher-payoff but riskier option that requires cooperation

Reference 57

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.393080Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation f727c11a-7608-44b7-96a8-bcec1606119d · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 58

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.378451Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 23d4621a-6536-424c-b233-f5dd9da7f67d · outbound

This paper cites trusting.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems trusting

Reference 59

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.362747Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 382b1286-59d8-4445-9128-da072f7afcc6 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 60

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.348820Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 4f17d1e2-ab6d-4644-9733-dd1e666048e8 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 61

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.335170Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation e2b94d8a-244b-4995-bfbb-9300e6260146 · outbound

This paper cites predictor.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems predictor

Reference 62

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.321673Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 0a95e936-aa2d-490e-a2ba-d429c537d853 · outbound

This paper cites predictor.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems predictor

Reference 63

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.308139Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 104b018b-9706-496d-a051-c3d86aa8988d · outbound

This paper cites The content of the boxes will be determined after she makes her choice.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems The content of the boxes will be determined after she makes her choice

Reference 64

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.294612Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 43769470-3904-44fe-a86c-27c48397a11b · outbound

This paper cites It recommends choosing the action that will lead to the best consequences, given the causal structure of the situation.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems It recommends choosing the action that will lead to the best consequences, given the causal structure of the situation

Reference 65

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.280751Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 35e64888-8452-49f8-b022-6ee8402eaedf · outbound

This paper cites predictor.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems predictor

Reference 66

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.267503Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation d222ea4e-f5a3-4415-ae6d-4e4e8f37016e · outbound

This paper cites - If Alice chooses both boxes, she is guaranteed to get at least 1 candy (from the transparent box), plus an 80% chance of getting 10 more candies from the opaque box.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems - If Alice chooses both boxes, she is guaranteed to get at least 1 candy (from the transparent box), plus an 80% chance of getting 10 more candies from the opaque box

Reference 67

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.253304Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 93adb9ea-f7a0-4e18-ba63-8c6460353f80 · outbound

This paper cites - In the 20% of cases where the opaque box is empty, she gets 1 candy instead of 0.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems - In the 20% of cases where the opaque box is empty, she gets 1 candy instead of 0

Reference 68

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.238870Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation d92588d3-c9dd-4067-a828-8659e4c11882 · outbound

This paper cites In this case, that's clearly two-boxing.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems In this case, that's clearly two-boxing

Reference 69

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.224962Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 40ef3fcb-4329-418a-8d05-b6fcde7035be · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 70

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.210886Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation b45688b3-a2da-437b-b62f-72389c0dfe0c · outbound

This paper cites - If you two-box, it's impossible for box A to contain the million dollars.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems - If you two-box, it's impossible for box A to contain the million dollars

Reference 71

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.197922Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 35ff5c55-8519-47b9-9e36-4ba9ef726130 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 72

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.183691Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 336bf425-49b6-4aa2-81d9-8d2712af2822 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 73

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.171062Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation f1ae2d7f-8cc3-4193-ac26-a7987bd7c3d6 · outbound

This paper cites This means the y_{2,0} outcome is not just possible, but guaranteed if you choose to two-box.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems This means the y_{2,0} outcome is not just possible, but guaranteed if you choose to two-box

Reference 74

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.157567Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 2c3e5da2-aa5b-4678-babb-f6007d39bdb8 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 75

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.143199Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation ebcf6220-1a45-42df-a8a1-6b847b1eda88 · outbound

This paper cites 48 Based on this reasoning, the principle does have something to say about whether the value of y_{2,0} should influence your decision.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems 48 Based on this reasoning, the principle does have something to say about whether the value of y_{2,0} should influence your decision

Reference 76

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.129656Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 45fac312-127b-4627-9a75-f513f145f9ac · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 77

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.116706Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 6dde481f-e1be-451e-beb6-fc6460eead7f · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 78

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.102496Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 79da5670-fb0f-46b1-aa45-ddc7d05a89c7 · outbound

This paper cites This means they make decisions based on the evidence of what their decision would indicate about the world, rather than on the causal consequences of their actions.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems This means they make decisions based on the evidence of what their decision would indicate about the world, rather than on the causal consequences of their actions

Reference 79

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.089290Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 801d7fb8-b687-473e-ac0d-9b81e6456ec5 · outbound

This paper cites Since we are identical, the fact that I chose to cooperate is strong evidence that Agent 2 would also choose to cooperate in my position. Therefore, I should cooperate as well.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Since we are identical, the fact that I chose to cooperate is strong evidence that Agent 2 would also choose to cooperate in my position. Therefore, I should cooperate as well

Reference 80

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.075251Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 4cffaacc-6d55-4b21-925c-7c1388e3ba07 · outbound

This paper cites Since we are identical, the fact that I chose to defect is strong evidence that Agent 2 would also choose to defect in my position. Therefore, I should defect as well.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Since we are identical, the fact that I chose to defect is strong evidence that Agent 2 would also choose to defect in my position. Therefore, I should defect as well

Reference 81

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.060262Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 1f07ba91-7bb2-445a-a75b-61ef80fd1368 · outbound

This paper cites Instead, it's about what Agent 2's decision indicates about the nature of agents like themselves.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Instead, it's about what Agent 2's decision indicates about the nature of agents like themselves

Reference 82

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.045101Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation ae35c076-aa54-4222-8438-1978b417241d · outbound

This paper cites recommend action.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems recommend action

Reference 83

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.029722Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 548c2d52-e902-4d1a-a891-375fb2a0670d · outbound

This paper cites like her.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems like her

Reference 84

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:31.015904Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 898bf867-e11e-4c1f-ab8b-d54cccc1eb54 · outbound

This paper cites evidential decision theory,.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems evidential decision theory,

Reference 85

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.999182Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 924fbf6c-3629-4075-ab5f-290efc53217c · outbound

This paper cites Each person makes their own independent decision.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Each person makes their own independent decision

Reference 86

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.984067Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation b4c133ba-eaac-4a9b-931d-e38ee70b58f4 · outbound

This paper cites if I stay home, everyone else like me will also stay home.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems if I stay home, everyone else like me will also stay home

Reference 87

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.969386Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 17130158-f76f-41f0-9a26-7a944d3b2621 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Unresolved cited work

Reference 88

Resolution: unresolved; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.954785Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation e0855b9a-6622-4bde-82b2-c55ca55fc1fb · outbound

This paper cites apply CDT.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems apply CDT

Reference 89

Resolution: malformed identifier; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.940372Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-12T06:34:41.77262+00:00.

Observation 4023745a-e78b-4846-9323-d073ce359660 · outbound

This paper cites Understanding the Interplay of Scale, Data, and Bias in Language Models: A Case Study with BERT.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Understanding the Interplay of Scale, Data, and Bias in Language Models: A Case Study with BERT

Reference 2001

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.472648Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 7f370a47-1ff0-4ecf-aabe-da65e857de0b · outbound

This paper cites Teaching language models to support answers with verified quotes.

A dataset of questions on decision-theoretic reasoning in Newcomb-like problems Teaching language models to support answers with verified quotes

Reference 2010

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T19:39:30.484630Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Coverage vector

Reference resolution

Outbound references

Pith citing papers