Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 157 references

Linear-optical protocols for mitigating and suppressing noise in bosonic systems

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that linear-optical components and photon counting, without nonlinear elements, can mitigate thermal and random-displacement noise and fully suppress dephasing noise in bosonic quantum systems.

desk verdict A genuinely useful linear-optics error-mitigation toolbox, but the flagship VMZ infinite-mode claim overreaches its proof by one limit-exchange step. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11313 v3 pith:SBPY6JTP submitted 2024-11-18 quant-ph

Y. S. Teo , S. U. Shringarpure , S. Cho , H. Jeong This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph MSC 81P6881P7381V80
keywords bosonicerrormitigationprobabilisticcancellationphotonsubtractiondephasingsuppressionlinearopticscontinuous-variablequantumcomputingMach-Zehnderinterferometercodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that two classes of bosonic noise—thermal/random-displacement noise and pure dephasing—can be fought with linear optics, photon counting, and classical postprocessing. For the first class, photon-subtraction gadgets placed before and after the channel asymptotically invert the noise, and probabilistic error cancellation turns the required unphysical amplification into a feasible sampling protocol with optimized estimators. For pure dephasing, a multimode Mach–Zehnder interferometer with vacuum measurements on ancillas converts the channel into a linear-attenuation channel, which linear amplification can then undo without Kerr nonlinearity. If these claims hold, bosonic codes such as cat, binomial, squeezed-cat, and GKP qubits gain practical error-mitigation and suppression tools that use currently available integrated photonic components.

What carries the argument

The two load-bearing objects are the photon-subtraction gadget (PSG) and the vacuum-based Mach–Zehnder (VMZ) scheme. A PSG is a noiseless linear amplifier or attenuator followed by photon subtraction; on coherent states it acts as $|\alpha\rangle\langle\alpha|\mapsto|g\alpha\rangle\langle g\alpha|$, which is why two PSGs of reciprocal gain sandwiching a thermal or displacement channel leave a scaled displacement mixture that vanishes for large gain. The VMZ scheme is an $M$-mode interferometer $U$, i.i.d. dephasing in the middle, the inverse $U^\dagger$, and vacuum measurements on $M-1$ ancillas; the random sum $s_1=\sum_j e^{i\phi_j}|U_{j1}|^2$ acts as the attenuating operator $s_1^{a^\dagger a}$, and its concentration via Chebyshev's inequality is what converts dephasing into a known linear-attenuation channel in the large-$M$ limit.

What would settle it

Simulate the VMZ protocol with a Hadamard interferometer on a Schrödinger-cat input state, propagating the full multimode state exactly in Fock space for increasing M, and compare the conditional output with the prediction $\lambda_\gamma^{a^\dagger a}\rho\,\lambda_\gamma^{*a^\dagger a}/\mathrm{tr}(\ldots)$. If the output deviates systematically as M grows, the infinite-M 'any state' claim fails; if it converges, the P-function exchange is supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that dephasing noise is not inherently a nonlinear problem. The VMZ scheme—an $M$-mode interferometer $U$, independent identical dephasing on every mode, the inverse interferometer $U^\dagger$, and vacuum measurements on $M-1$ ancillas—acts on coherent states as the operator $s_1^{a^\dagger a}$, where $s_1=\sum_j e^{i\phi_j}|U_{j1}|^2$ is a random complex number. Chebyshev's inequality shows that for Hadamard or unitary-two-design interferometers $s_1$ concentrates on $\lambda_\gamma=\overline{e^{i\phi}}$ as $M\to\infty$, so the conditional output becomes $\lambda_\gamma^{a^\dagger a}\rho\,\lambda_\gamma^{*a^\dagger a}$ with nonvanishing success probability; this is exactly a phase-space-rotated linear-attenuation channel, invertible by rotated linear amplification. The paper also proves that for thermal and random-displacement noise, amplifying and attenuating photon-subtraction gadgets on either side of the channel produce the same output as a scaled random-displacement channel, which becomes the original state as the gain grows.

Load-bearing premise

The proof that VMZ converts any dephasing channel into a linear-attenuation channel assumes that the infinite-ancilla limit can be moved inside the phase-space integral representing the input state; this exchange is not proven for input states whose phase-space representation is singular, such as highly nonclassical states.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For pure dephasing, no Kerr nonlinearity is required: in the large-ancilla limit the residual noise is a known linear-attenuation channel, and linear amplification can invert it.
  • Even with finite ancilla count, weak central-Gaussian dephasing is always suppressed, and a uniform (Hadamard) interferometer gives the best suppression fidelity.
  • Thermal and Gaussian-displacement noise can be asymptotically removed from expectation values using amplifying and attenuating photon-subtraction gadgets, with optimal physically-constrained estimators minimizing sampling error.
  • The two schemes commute, so composite channels such as thermal-plus-dephasing or displacement-plus-dephasing can be treated simultaneously, with improved fidelities for cat, binomial, squeezed-cat, and GKP codes.
  • With appropriate gate modifications, the same mitigation and suppression works for noise from universal gate operations, as shown numerically.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to apply the VMZ scheme to inputs with singular phase-space distributions (e.g., cat states) at finite $M$ and check convergence to Eq. (20), since the proof's limit exchange is not demonstrated for such distributions.
  • The VMZ 'quantum adder' mechanism suggests that the same interferometric setup could be used to estimate dephasing strength from the success probability $p_{\mathrm{VMZ}}$ or as a general phase-averaging primitive in continuous-variable protocols.
  • Because PSG and VMZ both use only linear optics and photon counting, integrating them into a single photonic circuit is a plausible engineering step; the dominant cost would be the nondeterministic success of the amplifying PSG, which the paper bounds via a known linear-optical amplification recipe.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops two linear-optical noise-handling protocols for bosonic systems. The first combines amplifying and attenuating photon-subtraction gadgets (PSGs) with probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) to mitigate thermal and random-displacement noise, including an optimized constrained estimator for finite sampling. The second, called VMZ, uses a multimode Mach-Zehnder interferometer with conditional vacuum measurements to suppress dephasing noise; the central claim is that in the infinite-ancilla limit the VMZ setup converts any dephasing channel into a rotated linear-attenuation channel for arbitrary input states, which can then be inverted by linear amplification. The paper also presents numerical demonstrations on binomial, cat, squeezed-cat, and GKP codes, including gate-noise scenarios.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides genuinely useful linear-optical tools for bosonic error mitigation and suppression: the PSG-PEC scheme addresses thermal and random-displacement noise without Kerr nonlinearities, and the VMZ scheme offers a linear-optical method to turn dephasing into an invertible attenuation channel. The analytical work is mostly self-contained: the PSG map identities, the constrained-estimator MSE formulas in Appendix B, and the finite-M fidelity calculations in Section 3.4 are derived carefully and are supported by numerical simulations on multiple bosonic codes. The authors also explicitly disclose the relation to the prior unitary-averaging work of Ref. [141] and state their additional contributions. The main weakness is a missing rigorous justification of the infinite-M limit for nonclassical input states, which is load-bearing for the universality claim of the VMZ protocol.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (19) to Eq. (20)] The passage from the coherent-state result in Eq. (17) to the arbitrary-state statement in Eq. (20) exchanges the limit M → ∞ with an integral over the Glauber-Sudarshan P function. For states with singular P functions, such as Fock states and squeezed states, this interchange is not justified by the text. Chebyshev's inequality (19) controls the random variable s1 pointwise for a fixed phase tuple, but it does not by itself control the operator-valued average in Eq. (18). The claim that VMZ turns 'any dephasing channel' into a rotated linear-attenuation channel for all input states therefore needs a direct convergence argument, for example by writing the action of s1^{a†a} in the Fock basis, using finite-rank approximations, and applying dominated convergence in trace norm. This is likely repairable, but it is currently absent.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (20) and following text] The statement that the residual channel can be inverted by the rotated linear amplification λ^{-a†a} requires λγ ≠ 0. For dephasing distributions with λγ = 0, such as uniform dephasing over the full circle, Eq. (20) reduces to a projection onto the vacuum (or is undefined when the input has no vacuum component), and the subsequent linear amplification is not defined. The abstract and Section 3.3 should either restrict the universality claim to dephasing distributions with |λγ| > 0 or explicitly describe the vacuum-projection behavior in the λγ = 0 case.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (18)] The overline notation for averaging over the phase tuple is introduced after the equation; it would be clearer to define it before Eq. (18) and to specify that the denominator is the corresponding averaged trace.
  2. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (5)] The rule-of-thumb expression for g in the thermal-noise case is hard to parse as typeset; the intended parentheses around the square-root expression should be made explicit.
  3. [Sec. 2.4, Eq. (10)] The constrained-estimator formulas rely on the Gaussian approximation (B.3) for the multinomial distribution; the validity condition and the role of the large-N assumption would be easier to follow if stated in the main text rather than only in Appendix B.
  4. [Sec. 3.4, Eq. (25) and Fig. 6] The claim that Eq. (25) is accurate even for small m and n is presented as a numerical observation; a brief explanation of why the approximation extends beyond the m,n ≫ 1 regime would strengthen the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PSG-PEC and VMZ results are analytical derivations from explicit channel definitions, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. Section 2 derives PSG-PEC mitigation from the definition of the PSG map (Eq. 2), its coherent-state action (Eq. 3), and the explicit inversion condition g' = 1/(g mu); Eq. (4) is a direct calculation, not a fitted target. The optimal-mu selection uses the analytically derived MSE (Eqs. 9-10) with noise parameters and target state as inputs, and no predicted quantity is defined in terms of a fitted constant. Section 3 derives VMZ suppression from beam-splitter algebra (Eqs. 16-17), the post-selected map (Eq. 18), and Chebyshev concentration (Eq. 19); the M-to-infinity result (Eq. 20) is a limit theorem rather than an ansatz. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. [72] and [153]) appear only as background or as standard identities that are also supported by independent references, so they are not load-bearing. The Special Note candidly acknowledges the prior 'unitary averaging' setup, and the paper's additional inversion and optimality claims are analytical extensions rather than a renaming. The flagged P-function limit interchange in Sec. 3.3 (Eq. 19 to Eq. 20) is a possible correctness gap that would require a dominated-convergence argument, but it is not circular because the target result is not assumed as an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The protocol introduces no new physical entities such as particles or forces. The free parameters are the gain g, the splitting mu, and the observable-decomposition coefficients; the axioms are standard quantum-optical modeling assumptions plus one unproved limit-exchange step. The invention content is the protocol design and statistical estimator, not new physics.

free parameters (3)
  • PSG gain g = e.g., g = 1.4 in Figs. 3, 4, 8; chosen via rule of thumb in Eq. (5)
    The gain parameter g controls the amount of noise inversion; it is chosen by hand or rule of thumb, not fitted to data, and affects the success probability and residual noise.
  • PSG split parameter mu = mu_opt minimizes MSE in Eq. (9); depends on noise parameters and target state
    For finite sampling N, mu determines the variance of the PEC estimator. The optimal mu is derived from the MSE formula, so it is an optimized protocol parameter rather than a fitted physical constant.
  • Squeezed displaced-Fock coefficients c_kn = Table E1 values for z = 3dB, alpha = 1; optimized via Alg. 2 to reach F > 0.99
    These coefficients decompose the target fidelity observable into 64 projectors. They are optimized numerically to represent the target state, but this is a measurement decomposition, not a parameter of the noise-mitigation claim.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Glauber-Sudarshan P function represents arbitrary quantum states, including distributions.
    Used throughout Secs. 2 and 3 to derive channel actions on general states from coherent-state behavior. For nonclassical states the P function is singular, so operations on distributions are formal.
  • domain assumption Thermal and random-displacement noise channels have the form of Eq. (1) with known displacement distributions.
    The channel-inversion formula (4) and the PEC weights (6) rely on the exact structural form of these channels. If the physical noise is not of this form, the mitigation is approximate.
  • domain assumption Dephasing channels act as independent and identically distributed phase rotations on each mode inside the VMZ interferometer.
    The averaging argument in Eq. (19) requires i.i.d. phase noise across modes. Correlated or non-identical dephasing would break the weak-law convergence used to derive Eq. (20).
  • ad hoc to paper The M to infinity limit can be exchanged with the P-function integral over alpha.
    The paper proves the VMZ convergence for coherent states and then asserts the result for all states 'with the P function formalism' (Sec. 3.3). No dominated convergence or regularity condition on the P function is given, which is a gap for distribution-valued P functions.
  • domain assumption Noiseless linear amplification with the maximum success probability from Ref. [106] is physically realizable using linear optics and Fock resource states.
    The PSG-PEC protocol relies on probabilistic linear amplification as a physical primitive; the success probability formula (26) is taken from Ref. [106].
  • standard math Chebyshev's inequality and the central limit theorem describe the relevant statistical convergence.
    Used to prove the VMZ convergence (Eq. 19) and the Gaussian approximation of the PEC estimator (Appendix B).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Linear-optical protocols for mitigating and suppressing noise in bosonic systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SBPY6JTP

@misc{pith2026241111313,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Linear-optical protocols for mitigating and suppressing noise in bosonic systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SBPY6JTP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11313}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum-information processing and computation with bosonic qubits are corruptible by noise channels. Using interferometers and photon-subtraction gadgets (PSGs) accompanied by linear amplification and attenuation, we establish linear-optical methods to mitigate and suppress bosonic noise channels. We first show that by employing amplifying and attenuating PSGs respectively at the input and output of either a thermal or random-displacement channel, probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) can be carried out to mitigate errors in expectation-value estimation. We also derive optimal physical estimators that are properly constrained to improve the sampling accuracy of PEC. Next, we prove that a purely-dephasing channel is coherently suppressible using a multimode Mach--Zehnder interferometer and conditional vacuum measurements (VMZ). In the limit of infinitely-many ancillas, with nonvanishing success rates, VMZ using either Hadamard or two-design interferometers turns any dephasing channel into a phase-space-rotated linear-attenuation channel that can subsequently be inverted with (rotated) linear amplification without Kerr nonlinearity. Moreover, for weak central-Gaussian dephasing, the suppression fidelity increases monotonically with the number of ancillas and most optimally with Hadamard interferometers. We demonstrate the performance of these linear-optical mitigation and suppression schemes on common noise channels (and their compositions) and popular bosonic codes. While the theoretical formalism pertains to idling noise channels, we also provide numerical evidence supporting mitigation and suppression capabilities with respect to noise from universal gate operations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11313 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Evolution of the Wigner function under various transformations. A four-component “cat” state (∝ |α⟩+|−α⟩+|iα⟩+|−iα⟩) of amplitude α = 2 undergoing (a) bare thermal-noise corruption (F = 0.475), (b) through an ordered sequence of linear amplification, thermal noise and linear attenuation (F = 0.265), and finally (c) through an ordered sequence of amplifying PSG, thermal noise and attenuating PSG (F = 0.825). Here, η … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The PSG-PEC mitigation setup. (a) The first amplifying PSG of a gain factor g > 0 is not CP and so cannot be directly realized. (b) One may portion it into a probabilistic amplification of gain gµ = g/µ and an attenuating PSG of parameter 0 < µ < 1. The choice of µ should optimize the error-mitigation performance. (c) More realistically, each distinct operation of the setup is noisy and may be accompanied by a PSGN … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) An example qubit state encoded in a 3dB-squeezed-“cat” code (r = 0.345, ϕ = 0, α = 1) is subjected to amplifying (amp, g = 1.4) and attenuating (attn, g ′ = 0.855) PSGs for mitigating thermal noise of η = 0.05 and n¯ = 0.5. (b) The landscapes of the theoretical MSE from (9) and (10) for both the unconstrained (unc) and constrained (con) estimators with respect to µ eventually flatten out as N increases (shown he… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: PSG-PEC mitigation of GDN for a qubit state encoded in the same 3dB-squeezed- “cat” code presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The VMZ suppression scheme involving linear-optical elements and conditional vacuum measurements (implementable with on-off photodetectors in principle). The complete Mach–Zehnder interferometer is described by M-mode unitary transformations U and U † that both sandwic…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The root-mean-square distance DRMS = qP9 m,n=0(SHad,mn − Semn) 2/102 against M for different central-Gaussian dephasing channels of dephasing rate η = 1 − e−γ, where a cutoff dimension of 10 was chosen for illustration. The largest DRMS occurs at γ = ∞ and M = 2, corre…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Noise mitigation with PSG-PEC in two scenarios: a PSG-treated state that is either (a) idling or (b) subjected to a gate operation. (c) If the intended unitary-gate operation on ρin is U, then a proper gate modification (U ′ ) should be carried out to minimize, if not …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The large-N estimated fidelities with PSG-PEC mitigation in the absence (blue) and presence (green) of PSGN (ηPSGN = 0.02, n¯PSGN = 0.1), and without (red) are shown here for both (a) thermal noise and (b) GDN. All histograms are normalized in probability. A total of 1…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: VMZ suppression of an idling central-Gaussian dephasing channel (η = 1 − e−γ = 0.05) for bosonic codes encoding a randomly-chosen qubit ket |qbit⟩ = |0⟩ 0.765 + |1⟩(0.641 + 0.058i). using a Hadamard U of M modes (M − 1 ancillary modes). The (a) suppression fidelity Fsu…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Single-mode gate modification in VMZ suppression to avoid interferometric gate distortion. (a) From [116], every U can be implemented with real, two-mode BSs and PSs (phase shifters). (b) For M = 2, a typical Hadamard U corresponds to the balanced two￾mode BS. The U ′…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Output fidelities with Hadamard-VMZ dephasing suppression (M = 2) in the absence (blue) and presence (green) of detector thermal noise (ηDET = 0.05, n¯DET = 0 for the CX gate and 0.1 for all other gates), and without (red). The operations considered are idle, D(0.27 +…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Compatibility between PSG-mitigation and VMZ-suppression schemes: (a) and (b) are equivalent for any U, g and g ′ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Suppressive mitigation of (a) thermal-dephasing noise and (b) GD-dephasing noise for the idle operation and the cubic phase gate e i 0.02 q 3 . Here the two channel￾noise layers are equally distributed in η so that the total noise rate remains as 0.05, with γ = 0.0253…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

157 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [83]

    Adam Taylor, Gabriele Bressanini, Hyukjoon Kwon, and M. S. Kim. Quantum error cancellation in photonic systems: Undoing photon losses. Phys. Rev. A, 110:022622, Aug 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [141]

    Universal gate set for continuous-variable quantum computation with microwave circuits

    Timo Hillmann, Fernando Quijandría, Göran Johansson, Alessandro Ferraro, Simone Gasparinetti, and Giulia Ferrini. Universal gate set for continuous-variable quantum computation with microwave circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:160501, Oct 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [1]

    P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro. Macroscopically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping. Phys. Rev. A, 59:2631–2634, Apr 1999

    1999

  4. [2]

    Encoding a qubit in an oscillator

    Daniel Gottesman, Alexei Kitaev, and John Preskill. Encoding a qubit in an oscillator. Phys. Rev. A, 64:012310, Jun 2001

    2001

  5. [3]

    Michael, Matti Silveri, R

    Marios H. Michael, Matti Silveri, R. T. Brierley, Victor V . Albert, Juha Salmilehto, Liang Jiang, and S. M. Girvin. New class of quantum error-correcting codes for a bosonic mode. Phys. Rev. X, 6:031006, Jul 2016

    2016

  6. [4]

    Albert, Kyungjoo Noh, Kasper Duivenvoorden, Dylan J

    Victor V . Albert, Kyungjoo Noh, Kasper Duivenvoorden, Dylan J. Young, R. T. Brierley, Philip Reinhold, Christophe Vuillot, Linshu Li, Chao Shen, S. M. Girvin, Barbara M. Terhal, and Liang Jiang. Performance and structure of single-mode bosonic codes. Phys. Rev. A, 97:032346, Mar 2018

    2018

  7. [5]

    Jacobs, A

    K. Jacobs, A. N. Jordan, and E. K. Irish. Energy measurements and preparation of canonical phase states of a nano-mechanical resonator. EPL, 82(1):18003, mar 2008

    2008

  8. [6]

    Encoding a qubit in an oscillator

    H. M. Vasconcelos, L. Sanz, and S. Glancy. All-optical generation of states for “Encoding a qubit in an oscillator”. Opt. Lett., 35(19):3261–3263, Oct 2010

    2010

Show all 157 references
  1. [7]

    Schoelkopf, Michel H

    Zaki Leghtas, Gerhard Kirchmair, Brian Vlastakis, Robert J. Schoelkopf, Michel H. Devoret, and Mazyar Mirrahimi. Hardware-efficient autonomous quantum memory protection. Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:120501, Sep 2013

    2013

  2. [8]

    Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation

    Mazyar Mirrahimi, Zaki Leghtas, Victor V Albert, Steven Touzard, Robert J Schoelkopf, Liang Jiang, and Michel H Devoret. Dynamically protected cat-qubits: a new paradigm for universal quantum computation. New J. Phys., 16(4):045014, apr 2014

    2014

  3. [9]

    Non-Gaussian and Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill state preparation by photon catalysis

    Miller Eaton, Rajveer Nehra, and Olivier Pfister. Non-Gaussian and Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill state preparation by photon catalysis. New J. Phys., 21(11):113034, nov 2019

    2019

  4. [10]

    Schoelkopf, Michel H

    Wen-Long Ma, Shruti Puri, Robert J. Schoelkopf, Michel H. Devoret, S.M. Girvin, and Liang Jiang. Quantum control of bosonic modes with superconducting circuits. Sci. Bull., 66(17):1789–1805, 2021

    2021

  5. [11]

    Measurement- free preparation of grid states

    Jacob Hastrup, Kimin Park, Jonatan Bohr Brask, Radim Filip, and Ulrik Lund Andersen. Measurement- free preparation of grid states. npj Quantum Inf., 7(1):17, Jan 2021

    2021

  6. [12]

    Generating the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill qubit using a cross-kerr interaction between squeezed light and fock states in optics

    Kosuke Fukui, Mamoru Endo, Warit Asavanant, Atsushi Sakaguchi, Jun-ichi Yoshikawa, and Akira Furusawa. Generating the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill qubit using a cross-kerr interaction between squeezed light and fock states in optics. Phys. Rev. A, 105:022436, Feb 2022

    2022

  7. [13]

    Creation of optical cat and GKP states using shaped free electrons

    Raphael Dahan, Gefen Baranes, Alexey Gorlach, Ron Ruimy, Nicholas Rivera, and Ido Kaminer. Creation of optical cat and GKP states using shaped free electrons. Phys. Rev. X, 13:031001, Jul 2023

    2023

  8. [14]

    Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light

    Shunya Konno, Warit Asavanant, Fumiya Hanamura, Hironari Nagayoshi, Kosuke Fukui, Atsushi Sakaguchi, Ryuhoh Ide, Fumihiro China, Masahiro Yabuno, Shigehito Miki, Hirotaka Terai, Kan Takase, Mamoru Endo, Petr Marek, Radim Filip, Peter van Loock, and Akira Furusawa. Logical stat...

    2024

  9. [15]

    Eli Bourassa, Rafael N

    Kan Takase, Fumiya Hanamura, Hironari Nagayoshi, J. Eli Bourassa, Rafael N. Alexander, Akito Kawasaki, Warit Asavanant, Mamoru Endo, and Akira Furusawa. Generation of flying logical qubits using generalized photon subtraction with adaptive Gaussian operations. Phys. Rev. A, 11...

    2024

  10. [16]

    A. P. Lund, H. Jeong, T. C. Ralph, and M. S. Kim. Conditional production of superpositions of coherent states with inefficient photon detection. Phys. Rev. A, 70:020101, 2004. Linear-optical protocols for mitigating and suppressing noise in bosonic systems 47

    2004

  11. [17]

    Jeong, M

    H. Jeong, M. S. Kim, T. C. Ralph, and B. S. Ham. Generation of macroscopic superposition states with small nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. A, 70:061801, 2004

    2004

  12. [18]

    Generation of optical ‘Schrödinger cats’ from photon number states

    Alexei Ourjoumtsev, Hyunseok Jeong, Rosa Tualle-Brouri, and Philippe Grangier. Generation of optical ‘Schrödinger cats’ from photon number states. Nature, 448(7155):784–786, 2007

    2007

  13. [19]

    Andersen, G

    U.L. Andersen, G. Leuchs, and C. Silberhorn. Continuous-variable quantum information processing. Laser Photonics Rev., 4(3):337–354, 2010

    2010

  14. [20]

    A. Mari, V . Giovannetti, and A. S. Holevo. Quantum state majorization at the output of bosonic Gaussian channels. Nature Commun., 5(1):3826, May 2014

    2014

  15. [21]

    Quantum information processing with bosonic qubits in circuit QED

    Atharv Joshi, Kyungjoo Noh, and Yvonne Y Gao. Quantum information processing with bosonic qubits in circuit QED. Quantum Sci. Technol., 6(3):033001, apr 2021

    2021

  16. [22]

    Sample efficient graph classification using binary Gaussian boson sampling

    Amanuel Anteneh and Olivier Pfister. Sample efficient graph classification using binary Gaussian boson sampling. Phys. Rev. A, 108:062411, Dec 2023

    2023

  17. [23]

    T. C. Ralph, A. Gilchrist, G. J. Milburn, W. J. Munro, and S. Glancy. Quantum computation with optical coherent states. Phys. Rev. A, 68:042319, 2003

    2003

  18. [24]

    Fault-tolerant computing with biased-noise superconducting qubits: a case study

    P Aliferis, F Brito, D P DiVincenzo, J Preskill, M Steffen, and B M Terhal. Fault-tolerant computing with biased-noise superconducting qubits: a case study. New J. Phys., 11(1):013061, 2009

    2009

  19. [25]

    Albert, and Liang Jiang

    Kyungjoo Noh, Victor V . Albert, and Liang Jiang. Quantum capacity bounds of Gaussian thermal loss channels and achievable rates with Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , 65(4):2563–2582, 2019

    2019

  20. [26]

    Grimsmo, Joshua Combes, and Ben Q

    Arne L. Grimsmo, Joshua Combes, and Ben Q. Baragiola. Quantum computing with rotation-symmetric bosonic codes. Phys. Rev. X, 10:011058, Mar 2020

    2020

  21. [27]

    Resource-efficient topological fault-tolerant quantum computation with hybrid entanglement of light

    Srikrishna Omkar, Yong Siah Teo, and Hyunseok Jeong. Resource-efficient topological fault-tolerant quantum computation with hybrid entanglement of light. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:060501, Aug 2020

    2020

  22. [28]

    Madsen, Fabian Laudenbach, Mohsen Falamarzi

    Lars S. Madsen, Fabian Laudenbach, Mohsen Falamarzi. Askarani, Fabien Rortais, Trevor Vincent, Jacob F. F. Bulmer, Filippo M. Miatto, Leonhard Neuhaus, Lukas G. Helt, Matthew J. Collins, Adriana E. Lita, Thomas Gerrits, Sae Woo Nam, Varun D. Vaidya, Matteo Menotti, Ish Dhand, ...

    2022

  23. [29]

    Fault-tolerant operation of bosonic qubits with discrete-variable ancillae

    Qian Xu, Pei Zeng, Daohong Xu, and Liang Jiang. Fault-tolerant operation of bosonic qubits with discrete-variable ancillae. Phys. Rev. X, 14:031016, Jul 2024

    2024

  24. [30]

    Sufficient condition for universal quantum computation using bosonic circuits

    Cameron Calcluth, Nicolas Reichel, Alessandro Ferraro, and Giulia Ferrini. Sufficient condition for universal quantum computation using bosonic circuits. PRX Quantum, 5:020337, May 2024

    2024

  25. [31]

    Fault- tolerant quantum computation by hybrid qubits with bosonic cat code and single photons

    Jaehak Lee, Nuri Kang, Seok-Hyung Lee, Hyunseok Jeong, Liang Jiang, and Seung-Woo Lee. Fault- tolerant quantum computation by hybrid qubits with bosonic cat code and single photons. PRX Quantum, 5:030322, Aug 2024

    2024

  26. [32]

    Frattini, Florian Hopfmueller, Chloe Gauvin-Ndiaye, Julien Camirand-Lemyre, and Philippe St-Jean

    Marc-Antoine Lemonde, Dany Lachance-Quirion, Guillaume Duclos-Cianci, Nicholas E. Frattini, Florian Hopfmueller, Chloe Gauvin-Ndiaye, Julien Camirand-Lemyre, and Philippe St-Jean. Hardware- efficient fault tolerant quantum computing with bosonic grid states in superconducting ...

    2024 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Aghaee Rad, T

    H. Aghaee Rad, T. Ainsworth, R. N. Alexander, B. Altieri, M. F. Askarani, R. Baby, L. Banchi, B. Q. Baragiola, J. E. Bourassa, R. S. Chadwick, I. Charania, H. Chen, M. J. Collins, P. Contu, N. D’Arcy, G. Dauphinais, R. De Prins, D. Deschenes, I. Di Luch, S. Duque, P. Edke, S. ...

    2025

  28. [34]

    Jeong and M

    H. Jeong and M. S. Kim. Efficient quantum computation using coherent states. Phys. Rev. A, 65:042305, Mar 2002

    2002

  29. [35]

    Near-deterministic quantum teleportation and resource-efficient quantum computation using linear optics and hybrid qubits

    Seung-Woo Lee and Hyunseok Jeong. Near-deterministic quantum teleportation and resource-efficient quantum computation using linear optics and hybrid qubits. Phys. Rev. A, 87:022326, Feb 2013

    2013

  30. [36]

    Multi-mode bosonic Gaussian channels

    F Caruso, J Eisert, V Giovannetti, and A S Holevo. Multi-mode bosonic Gaussian channels. New J. Phys., 10(8):083030, aug 2008

    2008

  31. [37]

    Classical capacity of quantum thermal noise channels to within 1.45 bits

    Robert König and Graeme Smith. Classical capacity of quantum thermal noise channels to within 1.45 bits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:040501, Jan 2013

    2013

  32. [38]

    Dieter Suter and Gonzalo A. Álvarez. Colloquium: Protecting quantum information against environmental noise. Rev. Mod. Phys., 88:041001, Oct 2016

    2016

  33. [39]

    Enhanced energy-constrained quantum communication over bosonic gaussian channels

    Kyungjoo Noh, Stefano Pirandola, and Liang Jiang. Enhanced energy-constrained quantum communication over bosonic gaussian channels. Nature Communications, 11(1):457, Jan 2020

    2020

  34. [40]

    Quantum capacity and codes for the bosonic loss-dephasing channel

    Peter Leviant, Qian Xu, Liang Jiang, and Serge Rosenblum. Quantum capacity and codes for the bosonic loss-dephasing channel. Quantum, 6:821, September 2022

    2022

  35. [41]

    Menicucci

    Kosuke Fukui, Takaya Matsuura, and Nicolas C. Menicucci. Efficient concatenated bosonic code for additive Gaussian noise. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131:170603, Oct 2023

    2023

  36. [42]

    Zixin Huang, Ludovico Lami, and Mark M. Wilde. Exact quantum sensing limits for bosonic dephasing channels. PRX Quantum, 5:020354, Jun 2024

    2024

  37. [43]

    Long-distance entanglement sharing using hybrid states of discrete and continuous variables

    Soumyakanti Bose, Jaskaran Singh, Adán Cabello, and Hyunseok Jeong. Long-distance entanglement sharing using hybrid states of discrete and continuous variables. Phys. Rev. Appl. , 21:064013, Jun 2024

    2024

  38. [44]

    T. C. Ralph. Quantum error correction of continuous-variable states against Gaussian noise. Phys. Rev. A, 84:022339, Aug 2011

    2011

  39. [45]

    Quantum error correction against photon loss using multicomponent cat states

    Marcel Bergmann and Peter van Loock. Quantum error correction against photon loss using multicomponent cat states. Phys. Rev. A, 94:042332, Oct 2016

    2016

  40. [46]

    Devoret, and S

    Shruti Puri, Alexander Grimm, Philippe Campagne-Ibarcq, Alec Eickbusch, Kyungjoo Noh, Gabrielle Roberts, Liang Jiang, Mazyar Mirrahimi, Michel H. Devoret, and S. M. Girvin. Stabilized cat in a driven nonlinear cavity: A fault-tolerant error syndrome detector. Phys. Rev. X, 9:0...

    2019

  41. [47]

    Fault-tolerant bosonic quantum error correction with the surface–Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code

    Kyungjoo Noh and Christopher Chamberland. Fault-tolerant bosonic quantum error correction with the surface–Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code. Phys. Rev. A, 101:012316, Jan 2020

    2020

  42. [48]

    Grimsmo and Shruti Puri

    Arne L. Grimsmo and Shruti Puri. Quantum error correction with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill code. PRX Quantum, 2(2), Jun 2021

    2021

  43. [49]

    Bosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quantum circuits

    Weizhou Cai, Yuwei Ma, Weiting Wang, Chang-Ling Zou, and Luyan Sun. Bosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quantum circuits. Fundam. Res., 1(1):50–67, 2021

    2021

  44. [50]

    All-optical cat-code quantum error correction

    Jacob Hastrup and Ulrik Lund Andersen. All-optical cat-code quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. Res., 4:043065, Oct 2022

    2022

  45. [51]

    Brady, Alec Eickbusch, Shraddha Singh, Jing Wu, and Quntao Zhuang

    Anthony J. Brady, Alec Eickbusch, Shraddha Singh, Jing Wu, and Quntao Zhuang. Advances in bosonic quantum error correction with Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill codes: Theory, engineering and applications. Prog. Quantum Electron., 93:100496, 2024

    2024

  46. [52]

    Error-corrected quantum repeaters with Gottesman- Kitaev-Preskill qudits

    Frank Schmidt, Daniel Miller, and Peter van Loock. Error-corrected quantum repeaters with Gottesman- Kitaev-Preskill qudits. Phys. Rev. A, 109:042427, Apr 2024

    2024

  47. [53]

    Gagatsos, Boulat A

    Christos N. Gagatsos, Boulat A. Bash, Saikat Guha, and Animesh Datta. Bounding the quantum limits of precision for phase estimation with loss and thermal noise. Phys. Rev. A, 96:062306, Dec 2017

    2017

  48. [54]

    Efficient classical simulation of noisy quantum computation

    Xun Gao and Luming Duan. Efficient classical simulation of noisy quantum computation. arXiv preprint,

  49. [55]

    Efficient classical simulation of noisy random quantum circuits in one dimension

    Kyungjoo Noh, Liang Jiang, and Bill Fefferman. Efficient classical simulation of noisy random quantum circuits in one dimension. Quantum, 4:318, September 2020

    2020

  50. [56]

    Classical simulation of lossy boson sampling using matrix product operators

    Changhun Oh, Kyungjoo Noh, Bill Fefferman, and Liang Jiang. Classical simulation of lossy boson sampling using matrix product operators. Phys. Rev. A, 104:022407, Aug 2021

    2021

  51. [57]

    Classical simulation of boson sampling Linear-optical protocols for mitigating and suppressing noise in bosonic systems 49 based on graph structure

    Changhun Oh, Youngrong Lim, Bill Fefferman, and Liang Jiang. Classical simulation of boson sampling Linear-optical protocols for mitigating and suppressing noise in bosonic systems 49 based on graph structure. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128:190501, May 2022

    2022

  52. [58]

    Rudolph, Ross Duncan, Ivan Rungger, and Cristina Cîrstoiu

    Enrico Fontana, Manuel S. Rudolph, Ross Duncan, Ivan Rungger, and Cristina Cîrstoiu. Classical simulations of noisy variational quantum circuits. arXiv preprint, 2023. arXiv: 2306.05400 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [59]

    Noisy random quantum circuit sampling and its classical simulation

    Meng Zhang, Chao Wang, and Yongjian Han. Noisy random quantum circuit sampling and its classical simulation. Adv. Quantum Technol., 6(7):2300030, 2023

    2023

  54. [60]

    Chen, Wenhan Dai, Dirk Englund, and Yasser Omar

    Luís Bugalho, Emmanuel Zambrini Cruzeiro, Kevin C. Chen, Wenhan Dai, Dirk Englund, and Yasser Omar. Resource-efficient simulation of noisy quantum circuits and application to network-enabled qram optimization. npj Quantum Inf., 9(1):105, Oct 2023

    2023

  55. [61]

    Classical simulability of constant-depth linear-optical circuits with noise

    Changhun Oh. Classical simulability of constant-depth linear-optical circuits with noise. arXiv preprint,

  56. [62]

    Gabriele Bressanini, Hyukjoon Kwon, and M. S. Kim. Gaussian boson sampling at finite temperature. Phys. Rev. A, 109:013707, Jan 2024

    2024

  57. [63]

    Nissim Ofek, Andrei Petrenko, Reinier Heeres, Philip Reinhold, Zaki Leghtas, Brian Vlastakis, Yehan Liu, Luigi Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, L. Jiang, Mazyar Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf. Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducti...

    2016

  58. [64]

    Deterministic generation of a four-component optical cat state

    Jacob Hastrup, Jonas Schou Neergaard-Nielsen, and Ulrik Lund Andersen. Deterministic generation of a four-component optical cat state. Opt. Lett., 45(3):640–643, 2020

    2020

  59. [65]

    Daiqin Su, Ish Dhand, and Timothy C. Ralph. Universal quantum computation with optical four- component cat qubits. Phys. Rev. A, 106:042614, 2022

    2022

  60. [66]

    Mi ˇcuda, I

    M. Mi ˇcuda, I. Straka, M. Miková, M. Dušek, N. J. Cerf, J. Fiurášek, and M. Ježek. Noiseless loss suppression in quantum optical communication. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:180503, Nov 2012

    2012

  61. [67]

    Winnel, Nedasadat Hosseinidehaj, and Timothy C

    Matthew S. Winnel, Nedasadat Hosseinidehaj, and Timothy C. Ralph. Generalized quantum scissors for noiseless linear amplification. Phys. Rev. A, 102:063715, Dec 2020

    2020

  62. [68]

    C. M. Nunn, J. D. Franson, and T. B. Pittman. Heralding on the detection of zero photons. Phys. Rev. A, 104:033717, Sep 2021

    2021

  63. [69]

    S. U. Shringarpure, C. M. Nunn, T. B. Pittman, and J. D. Franson. Coherence of quantum states after noiseless attenuation. Phys. Rev. A, 105:013704, 2022

    2022

  64. [70]

    C. M. Nunn, J. D. Franson, and T. B. Pittman. Modifying quantum optical states by zero-photon subtraction. Phys. Rev. A, 105:033702, 2022

    2022

  65. [71]

    C. M. Nunn, S. U. Shringarpure, and T. B. Pittman. Transforming photon statistics through zero-photon subtraction. Phys. Rev. A, 107:043711, 2023

    2023

  66. [72]

    Shringarpure, Yong Siah Teo, and Hyunseok Jeong

    Saurabh U. Shringarpure, Yong Siah Teo, and Hyunseok Jeong. Error suppression in multicomponent cat codes with photon subtraction and teleamplification. Opt. Express, 32(12):20719–20741, Jun 2024

    2024

  67. [73]

    Gisin, N

    N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu. Error filtration and entanglement purification for quantum communication. Phys. Rev. A, 72:012338, 2005

    2005

  68. [74]

    Hann, Shruti Puri, S

    Gideon Lee, Connor T. Hann, Shruti Puri, S. M. Girvin, and Liang Jiang. Error suppression for arbitrary- size black box quantum operations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131:190601, Nov 2023

    2023

  69. [75]

    Virtual channel purification

    Zhenhuan Liu, Xingjian Zhang, Yue-Yang Fei, and Zhenyu Cai. Virtual channel purification. arXiv preprint, 2024. arXiv: 2402.07866 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [76]

    Benjamin, Suguru Endo, William J

    Zhenyu Cai, Ryan Babbush, Simon C. Benjamin, Suguru Endo, William J. Huggins, Ying Li, Jarrod R. McClean, and Thomas E. O’Brien. Quantum error mitigation. Rev. Mod. Phys., 95:045005, Dec 2023

    2023

  71. [77]

    Quantum error mitigation for rotation symmetric bosonic codes with symmetry expansion

    Suguru Endo, Yasunari Suzuki, Kento Tsubouchi, Rui Asaoka, Kaoru Yamamoto, Yuichiro Matsuzaki, and Yuuki Tokunaga. Quantum error mitigation for rotation symmetric bosonic codes with symmetry expansion. arXiv preprint, 2022. arXiv: 2211.06164 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  72. [78]

    Projective squeezing for translation symmetric bosonic codes

    Suguru Endo, Keitaro Anai, Yuichiro Matsuzaki, Yuuki Tokunaga, and Yasunari Suzuki. Projective squeezing for translation symmetric bosonic codes. arXiv preprint, 2024. arXiv: 2403.1421 [quant- ph]

    2024

  73. [79]

    Munro, Peter van Loock, Kae Nemoto, and Nicoló Lo Piparo

    Pei-Zhe Li, Josephine Dias, William J. Munro, Peter van Loock, Kae Nemoto, and Nicoló Lo Piparo. Performance of rotation-symmetric bosonic codes in a quantum repeater network. Adv. Quantum Technol., 7(6):2300252, 2024. Linear-optical protocols for mitigating and suppressing no...

    2024

  74. [80]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature, 409(6816):46–52, Jan 2001

    2001

  75. [81]

    Minev, Abhinav Kandala, and Kristan Temme

    Ewout van den Berg, Zlatko K. Minev, Abhinav Kandala, and Kristan Temme. Probabilistic error cancellation with sparse Pauli–Lindblad models on noisy quantum processors. Nature Physics , 19(8):1116–1121, Aug 2023

    2023

  76. [82]

    Gupta, Ewout van den Berg, Maika Takita, Diego Ristè, Kristan Temme, and Abhinav Kandala

    Riddhi S. Gupta, Ewout van den Berg, Maika Takita, Diego Ristè, Kristan Temme, and Abhinav Kandala. Probabilistic error cancellation for dynamic quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. A, 109:062617, Jun 2024

    2024

  77. [84]

    Anderson and Boulat A

    Evan J.D. Anderson and Boulat A. Bash. Fundamental limits of thermal-noise lossy bosonic multiple access channel. In 2022 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), pages 1–6, 2022

    2022

  78. [85]

    Changhun Oh, Senrui Chen, Yat Wong, Sisi Zhou, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Jens A. H. Nielsen, Zheng-Hao Liu, Jonas S. Neergaard-Nielsen, Ulrik L. Andersen, Liang Jiang, and John Preskill. Entanglement-enabled advantage for learning a bosonic random displacement channel. Phys. Rev. Lett....

    2024

  79. [86]

    Joachim Schäfer, Evgueni Karpov, and Nicolas J. Cerf. Gaussian capacity of the quantum bosonic memory channel with additive correlated Gaussian noise. Phys. Rev. A, 84:032318, Sep 2011

    2011

  80. [87]

    Kyungjoo Noh, S. M. Girvin, and Liang Jiang. Encoding an oscillator into many oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:080503, Aug 2020

    2020

  81. [88]

    Quantum communication on the bosonic loss-dephasing channel

    Francesco Anna Mele, Farzin Salek, Vittorio Giovannetti, and Ludovico Lami. Quantum communication on the bosonic loss-dephasing channel. Phys. Rev. A, 110:012460, Jul 2024

    2024

  82. [89]

    Energy-constrained LOCC-assisted quantum capacity of the bosonic dephasing channel

    Amir Arqand, Laleh Memarzadeh, and Stefano Mancini. Energy-constrained LOCC-assisted quantum capacity of the bosonic dephasing channel. Entropy, 25(7), 2023

    2023

  83. [90]

    Discrimination of dephasing channels

    Milajiguli Rexiti, Laleh Memarzadeh, and Stefano Mancini. Discrimination of dephasing channels. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 55(24):245301, may 2022

    2022

  84. [91]

    Quantum-enabled communication without a phase reference

    Quntao Zhuang. Quantum-enabled communication without a phase reference. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 126:060502, Feb 2021

    2021

  85. [92]

    Squeezing-enhanced communication without a phase reference

    Marco Fanizza, Matteo Rosati, Michalis Skotiniotis, John Calsamiglia, and Vittorio Giovannetti. Squeezing-enhanced communication without a phase reference. Quantum, 5:608, December 2021

    2021

  86. [93]

    Quantum capacity of a bosonic dephasing channel

    Amir Arqand, Laleh Memarzadeh, and Stefano Mancini. Quantum capacity of a bosonic dephasing channel. Phys. Rev. A, 102:042413, Oct 2020

    2020

  87. [94]

    K. H. Wanser. Fundamental phase noise limit in optical fibres due to temperature fluctuations. Electron. Lett., 28:53–54(1), January 1992

    1992

  88. [95]

    Derickson

    D. Derickson. Fiber Optic Test and Measurement. Prentice Hall PTR, New York, 1998

    1998

  89. [96]

    Barbara M. Terhal. Quantum error correction for quantum memories. Rev. Mod. Phys., 87:307–346, Apr 2015

    2015

  90. [97]

    H. H. Zhu, J. Zou, H. Zhang, Y . Z. Shi, S. B. Luo, N. Wang, H. Cai, L. X. Wan, B. Wang, X. D. Jiang, J. Thompson, X. S. Luo, X. H. Zhou, L. M. Xiao, W. Huang, L. Patrick, M. Gu, L. C. Kwek, and A. Q. Liu. Space-efficient optical computing with an integrated chip diffractive n...

    2022

  91. [98]

    Optical neural networks: progress and challenges

    Tingzhao Fu, Jianfa Zhang, Run Sun, Yuyao Huang, Wei Xu, Sigang Yang, Zhihong Zhu, and Hongwei Chen. Optical neural networks: progress and challenges. Light Sci. Appl., 13(1):263, 2024

    2024

  92. [99]

    Harrow and Richard A

    Aram W. Harrow and Richard A. Low. Random Quantum Circuits are Approximate 2-designs. Commun. Math. Phys., 291(1):257–302, October 2009

    2009

  93. [100]

    Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation

    Christoph Dankert, Richard Cleve, Joseph Emerson, and Etera Livine. Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation. Phys. Rev. A, 80:012304, Jul 2009

    2009

  94. [101]

    Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Aram W. Harrow, and Michał Horodecki. Local random quantum circuits are approximate polynomial-designs. Commun. Math. Phys., 346(2):397–434, Sep 2016

    2016

  95. [102]

    Random quantum circuits are approximate unitary

    Jonas Haferkamp. Random quantum circuits are approximate unitary. Quantum, 6:795, September 2022

    2022

  96. [103]

    Negativity of quasiprobability distributions as a measure of nonclassicality

    Kok Chuan Tan, Seongjeon Choi, and Hyunseok Jeong. Negativity of quasiprobability distributions as a measure of nonclassicality. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124:110404, Mar 2020. Linear-optical protocols for mitigating and suppressing noise in bosonic systems 51

    2020

  97. [104]

    Carlton M. Caves. Quantum limits on noise in linear amplifiers. Phys. Rev. D, 26:1817–1839, Oct 1982

    1982

  98. [105]

    Caves, Joshua Combes, Zhang Jiang, and Shashank Pandey

    Carlton M. Caves, Joshua Combes, Zhang Jiang, and Shashank Pandey. Quantum limits on phase- preserving linear amplifiers. Phys. Rev. A, 86:063802, Dec 2012

    2012

  99. [106]

    Guanzon, Matthew S

    Joshua J. Guanzon, Matthew S. Winnel, Deepesh Singh, Austin P. Lund, and Timothy C. Ralph. Saturating the maximum success probability bound for noiseless linear amplification using linear optics. PRX Quantum, 5:020359, Jun 2024

    2024

  100. [107]

    Neergaard-Nielsen, Yujiro Eto, Chang-Woo Lee, Hyunseok Jeong, and Masahide Sasaki

    Jonas S. Neergaard-Nielsen, Yujiro Eto, Chang-Woo Lee, Hyunseok Jeong, and Masahide Sasaki. Quantum tele-amplification with a continuous-variable superposition state. Nat. Photonics, 7(6):439– 443, Jun 2013

    2013

  101. [108]

    Teleportation-based noiseless quantum amplification of coherent states of light

    Jaromír Fiurášek. Teleportation-based noiseless quantum amplification of coherent states of light. Opt. Express, 30(2):1466–1489, Jan 2022

    2022

  102. [109]

    Guanzon, Matthew S

    Joshua J. Guanzon, Matthew S. Winnel, Austin P. Lund, and Timothy C. Ralph. Noiseless linear amplification and loss-tolerant quantum relay using coherent-state superpositions. Phys. Rev. A , 108:032411, Sep 2023

    2023

  103. [110]

    Conlon, Spyros Tserkis, Biveen Shajilal, Kui Liu, Timothy C

    Jie Zhao, Hao Jeng, Lorcán O. Conlon, Spyros Tserkis, Biveen Shajilal, Kui Liu, Timothy C. Ralph, Syed M. Assad, and Ping Koy Lam. Enhancing quantum teleportation efficacy with noiseless linear amplification. Nature Communications, 14(1):4745, Aug 2023

    2023

  104. [111]

    Analysis of continuous-variable quantum teleportation enhanced by measurement- based noiseless quantum amplification

    Jaromír Fiurášek. Analysis of continuous-variable quantum teleportation enhanced by measurement- based noiseless quantum amplification. Opt. Express, 32(2):2527–2538, Jan 2024

    2024

  105. [112]

    Amplifying hybrid entangled states and superpositions of coherent states

    InU Jeon, Sungjoo Cho, and Hyunseok Jeong. Amplifying hybrid entangled states and superpositions of coherent states. arXiv preprint, 2024. arXiv: 2409.16562 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  106. [113]

    Howard, Barry C

    Artur Scherer, Regina B. Howard, Barry C. Sanders, and Wolfgang Tittel. Quantum states prepared by realistic entanglement swapping. Phys. Rev. A, 80:062310, Dec 2009

    2009

  107. [114]

    Ultrafast single-photon detection using nanophotonic parametric amplifiers

    Elina Sendonaris, James Williams, Rajveer Nehra, Robert Gray, Ryoto Sekine, Luis Ledezma, and Alireza Marandi. Ultrafast single-photon detection using nanophotonic parametric amplifiers. arXiv preprint,

  108. [115]

    Bernstein, and Philip Bertani

    Michael Reck, Anton Zeilinger, Herbert J. Bernstein, and Philip Bertani. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. Phys. Rev. Lett., 73:58–61, Jul 1994

    1994

  109. [116]

    Clements, Peter C

    William R. Clements, Peter C. Humphreys, Benjamin J. Metcalf, W. Steven Kolthammer, and Ian A. Walmsley. Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers. Optica, 3(12):1460–1465, Dec 2016

    2016

  110. [117]

    arXiv: 2410.18397 [physics.optics]

    arXiv

  111. [118]

    Implementing arbitrary multimode continuous-variable quantum gates with fixed non-Gaussian states and adaptive linear optics

    Fumiya Hanamura, Warit Asavanant, Hironari Nagayoshi, Atsushi Sakaguchi, Ryuhoh Ide, Kosuke Fukui, Peter van Loock, and Akira Furusawa. Implementing arbitrary multimode continuous-variable quantum gates with fixed non-Gaussian states and adaptive linear optics. Phys. Rev. A, 1...

    2024

  112. [119]

    Jöns, Jin Chang, Andreas Fognini, Stephan Steinhauer, Val Zwiller, Artur Zrenner, and Tim J

    Thomas Hummel, Alex Widhalm, Jan Philipp Höpker, Klaus D. Jöns, Jin Chang, Andreas Fognini, Stephan Steinhauer, Val Zwiller, Artur Zrenner, and Tim J. Bartley. Nanosecond gating of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors using cryogenic bias circuitry. Opt. Express , ...

    2023

  113. [120]

    Christian Arends, Lasse Wolf, Jasmin Meinecke, Sonja Barkhofen, Tobias Weich, and Tim J. Bartley. Decomposing large unitaries into multimode devices of arbitrary size. Phys. Rev. Res., 6:L012043, Feb 2024

    2024

  114. [121]

    Integration with respect to the Haar measure on unitary, orthogonal and symplectic group

    Benoît Collins and Piotr ´Sniady. Integration with respect to the Haar measure on unitary, orthogonal and symplectic group. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 264(3):773–795, Jun 2006

    2006

  115. [122]

    Mezzadri

    F. Mezzadri. How to generate random matrices from the classical compact groups. Not. Am. Math. Soc., 54:592, 2007

    2007

  116. [123]

    Timon Schapeler, Niklas Lamberty, Thomas Hummel, Fabian Schlue, Michael Stefszky, Benjamin Brecht, Christine Silberhorn, and Tim J. Bartley. Electrical trace analysis of superconducting nanowire photon- number-resolving detectors. Phys. Rev. Appl., 22:014024, Jul 2024

    2024

  117. [124]

    Introduction to Haar measure tools in quantum information: A beginner’s tutorial

    Antonio Anna Mele. Introduction to Haar measure tools in quantum information: A beginner’s tutorial. Quantum, 8:1340, 2024

    2024

  118. [125]

    T. A. Severini. Elements of Distribution Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005

    2005

  119. [126]

    Puchała and J.A

    Z. Puchała and J.A. Miszczak. Symbolic integration with respect to the Haar measure on the unitary groups. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., 65(No 1):21–27, 2017. Linear-optical protocols for mitigating and suppressing noise in bosonic systems 52

    2017

  120. [127]

    Gao, Brian J

    Yvonne Y . Gao, Brian J. Lester, Yaxing Zhang, Chen Wang, Serge Rosenblum, Luigi Frunzio, Liang Jiang, S. M. Girvin, and Robert J. Schoelkopf. Programmable interference between two microwave quantum memories. Phys. Rev. X, 8:021073, Jun 2018

    2018

  121. [128]

    R. Y . Teh, P. D. Drummond, and M. D. Reid. Overcoming decoherence of schrödinger cat states formed in a cavity using squeezed-state inputs. Phys. Rev. Res., 2:043387, Dec 2020

    2020

  122. [129]

    Doherty, and Arne L

    Juliette Soule, Andrew C. Doherty, and Arne L. Grimsmo. Concatenating binomial codes with the planar code. arXiv preprint, 2023. arXiv: 2312.14390 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  123. [130]

    Adapting coherent-state superpositions in noisy channels

    Jan Provazník, Petr Marek, Julien Laurat, and Radim Filip. Adapting coherent-state superpositions in noisy channels. arXiv preprint, 2024. arXiv: 2406.01081 [quant-ph]

    2024

  124. [131]

    Baptiste Royer, Shraddha Singh, and S. M. Girvin. Stabilization of finite-energy Gottesman-Kitaev- Preskill states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:260509, Dec 2020

    2020

  125. [132]

    Schlegel, Fabrizio Minganti, and Vincenzo Savona

    David S. Schlegel, Fabrizio Minganti, and Vincenzo Savona. Quantum error correction using squeezed Schrödinger cat states. Phys. Rev. A, 106:022431, Aug 2022

    2022

  126. [133]

    Two-qubit operations for finite-energy Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill encodings

    Ivan Rojkov, Paul Moser Röggla, Martin Wagener, Moritz Fontboté-Schmidt, Stephan Welte, Jonathan Home, and Florentin Reiter. Two-qubit operations for finite-energy Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill encodings. Phys. Rev. Lett., 133:100601, Sep 2024

    2024

  127. [134]

    Ground state nature and nonlinear squeezing of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states

    Petr Marek. Ground state nature and nonlinear squeezing of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 132:210601, May 2024

    2024

  128. [135]

    Eli Bourassa, Nicolas C

    Ilan Tzitrin, J. Eli Bourassa, Nicolas C. Menicucci, and Krishna Kumar Sabapathy. Progress towards practical qubit computation using approximate Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes. Phys. Rev. A , 101:032315, Mar 2020

    2020

  129. [136]

    Applications of near- term photonic quantum computers: software and algorithms

    Thomas R Bromley, Juan Miguel Arrazola, Soran Jahangiri, Josh Izaac, Nicolás Quesada, Alain Delgado Gran, Maria Schuld, Jeremy Swinarton, Zeid Zabaneh, and Nathan Killoran. Applications of near- term photonic quantum computers: software and algorithms. Quantum Sci. Technol. , ...

    2020

  130. [137]

    Riemannian optimization of photonic quantum circuits in phase and Fock space

    Yuan Yao, Filippo Miatto, and Nicolás Quesada. Riemannian optimization of photonic quantum circuits in phase and Fock space. SciPost Phys., 17(3), September 2024

    2024

  131. [138]

    Strawberry Fields: A software platform for photonic quantum computing

    Nathan Killoran, Josh Izaac, Nicolás Quesada, Ville Bergholm, Matthew Amy, and Christian Weedbrook. Strawberry Fields: A software platform for photonic quantum computing. Quantum, 3:129, March 2019

    2019

  132. [139]

    All-optical quantum computing using cubic phase gates

    Niklas Budinger, Akira Furusawa, and Peter van Loock. All-optical quantum computing using cubic phase gates. Phys. Rev. Res., 6:023332, Jun 2024

    2024

  133. [140]

    Marshman, Austin P

    Ryan J. Marshman, Austin P. Lund, Peter P. Rohde, and Timothy C. Ralph. Passive quantum error correction of linear optics networks through error averaging. Phys. Rev. A, 97:022324, Feb 2018

    2018

  134. [142]

    Y . S. Teo. Introduction to Quantum-State Estimation. World Scientific, Singapore, 2015

    2015

  135. [143]

    Pe ˇrina

    J. Pe ˇrina. Quantum Statistics of Linear and Nonlinear Optical Phenomena . Springer Dordrecht, Dordrecht, 1991

    1991

  136. [144]

    Nibedita Swain, Ryan J

    S. Nibedita Swain, Ryan J. Marshman, Peter P. Rohde, Austin P. Lund, Alexander S. Solntsev, and Timothy C. Ralph. Improving continuous-variable quantum channels with unitary averaging. Phys. Rev. A, 110:032622, Sep 2024

    2024

  137. [145]

    K. E. Cahill and R. J. Glauber. Density operators and quasiprobability distributions. Phys. Rev., 177:1882, 1969

    1969

  138. [146]

    Minimal qubit tomography

    Jaroslav ˇReháˇcek, Berthold-Georg Englert, and Dagomir Kaszlikowski. Minimal qubit tomography. Linear-optical protocols for mitigating and suppressing noise in bosonic systems 53 Phys. Rev. A, 70:052321, Nov 2004

    2004

  139. [147]

    Quantum Continuous Variables: A Primer of Theoretical Methods

    Alessio Serafini. Quantum Continuous Variables: A Primer of Theoretical Methods . CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017

    2017

  140. [148]

    Convex Optimization

    Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe. Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009

    2009

  141. [149]

    CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1

    Michael Grant and Stephen Boyd. CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1. http://cvxr.com/cvx, March 2014

    2014

  142. [150]

    On the operator bases underlying Wigner’s, Kirkwood’s and Glauber’s phase space functions

    B G Englert. On the operator bases underlying Wigner’s, Kirkwood’s and Glauber’s phase space functions. J. Phys. A Math. Gen., 22(6):625, mar 1989

    1989

  143. [151]

    Projective measurement onto arbitrary superposition of weak coherent state bases.Sci

    Shuro Izumi, Masahiro Takeoka, Kentaro Wakui, Mikio Fujiwara, Kazuhiro Ema, and Masahide Sasaki. Projective measurement onto arbitrary superposition of weak coherent state bases.Sci. Rep., 8(1):2999, Feb 2018

    2018

  144. [152]

    Cerezo, and Patrick J

    Zoë Holmes, Kunal Sharma, M. Cerezo, and Patrick J. Coles. Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateaus. PRX Quantum, 3:010313, Jan 2022

    2022

  145. [153]

    Graph implementations for nonsmooth convex programs

    Michael Grant and Stephen Boyd. Graph implementations for nonsmooth convex programs. In V . Blondel, S. Boyd, and H. Kimura, editors, Recent Advances in Learning and Control , Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, pages 95–110. Springer-Verlag Limited, 2008. http:...

  146. [154]

    Generation of optical Schrödinger cat states by generalized photon subtraction

    Kan Takase, Jun-ichi Yoshikawa, Warit Asavanant, Mamoru Endo, and Akira Furusawa. Generation of optical Schrödinger cat states by generalized photon subtraction. Phys. Rev. A, 103:013710, Jan 2021

    2021

  147. [156]

    Virtual distillation with noise dilution

    Yong Siah Teo, Seongwook Shin, Hyukgun Kwon, Seok-Hyung Lee, and Hyunseok Jeong. Virtual distillation with noise dilution. Phys. Rev. A, 107:022608, Feb 2023

    2023

  148. [2018]

    arXiv: 1810.03176 [quant-ph]

    arXiv

  149. [2024]

    arXiv: 2406.08086 [quant-ph]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.