Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Perturbations of Black Holes Surrounded by Anisotropic Matter Field

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Anisotropic matter around a black hole splits its quasinormal frequencies away from Schwarzschild.

desk verdict Useful parameter scan for a known matter-hair metric; the l>=2 results are solid but the l=0 QNM claim sits inside WKB error and the abstract overreaches. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11629 v1 pith:MVJHGXB4 submitted 2024-11-18 gr-qc

Sagar J C , Karthik R , Katheek Hegde , K. M. Ajith , Shreyas Punacha , A. Naveena Kumara This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C3583C25 PACS 04.70.-s04.30.-w
keywords blackholeperturbationtheoryquasinormalmodesanisotropicmatterfieldshadowLyapunovexponentgrey-bodyfactorWKBapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the diffuse anisotropic matter that often surrounds a black hole leaves a measurable imprint on how the hole rings after a perturbation. The authors study a family of static, spherically symmetric solutions that generalize the Reissner-Nordström metric with an anisotropic fluid, and they compute the quasinormal modes of massless scalar and electromagnetic fields using higher-order WKB methods. Their central finding is that the matter parameter $K$ splits the quasinormal frequencies away from their Schwarzschild values: positive $K$ lowers the real part of the frequency, negative $K$ raises it, and the imaginary part moves in the opposite sense. The same splitting shows up in the shadow radius, the Lyapunov exponent, and the grey-body factors, which suggests a coherent geometric signature rather than an isolated feature of one observable. If the claim holds, ringdown and shadow measurements could carry information about the amount and equation of state of ambient matter around the hole.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a pair of Schrödinger-like effective potentials, $V_{\mathrm{SC}}(r) = \left[\frac{\ell(\ell+1)}{r^2} + \frac{2M}{r^3} + \frac{2Kw}{r^{2(w+1)}}\right] f(r)$ for scalar perturbations and $V_{\mathrm{EM}}(r) = \frac{\ell(\ell+1)}{r^2} f(r)$ for electromagnetic perturbations, where $f(r) = 1 - 2M/r - K/r^{2w}$. The $K$-term deforms the height and curvature of the potential barrier relative to Schwarzschild; the WKB quantization condition at optimal order converts that deformation into the complex quasinormal frequencies, and the eikonal relations $\omega_R = \ell/R_s$ and $\lambda = \lim_{\ell\to\infty}[-\omega_I/(n+1/2)]$ carry the same deformation into the shadow radius and Lyapunov exponent.

What would settle it

Take the same parameters as Table I ($M=1$, $w=3/2$, $l=1$, $n=0$, $K=\pm 0.2$) and compute the scalar quasinormal frequency with a direct numerical integration of the radial equation or a continued-fraction method; if the difference between the $K=+0.2$ and $K=-0.2$ frequencies does not reproduce the reported splitting direction and magnitude at the level of roughly one percent in the real part, the WKB-based central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the neutral anisotropic-matter background ($Q=0$), with metric function $f(r) = 1 - 2M/r - K/r^{2w}$, the paper shows that scalar and electromagnetic quasinormal frequencies are split around their Schwarzschild values by the matter parameter $K$: for fixed $w$, positive $K$ decreases the real part of $\omega$ and increases the magnitude of the imaginary part, while negative $K$ does the opposite; the deviations grow as $w$ decreases and vanish as $w\to\infty$ or $K\to 0$. Through the eikonal correspondence the same $K$-dependence appears in the shadow radius, which increases for positive $K$ and decreases for negative $K$, in the Lyapunov exponent of photon-sphere orbits, and in the grey-body factors, which rise with positive $K$.

Load-bearing premise

The computation assumes the WKB approximation at the chosen optimal order is accurate enough that the matter-induced frequency shift is real; for the lowest angular modes the estimated WKB error is comparable to the shift, so those modes alone would not settle the claim.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the ringdown phase, the first scalar and electromagnetic modes shift by fractions of a percent to a few percent for $|K|\lesssim 0.2$, with the sign of $K$ encoded in the direction of the real-frequency shift.
  • The eikonal relation $\omega_R = \ell/R_s$ holds for all $K$ and $w$ studied, so a measured shadow radius predicts the eikonal ringdown frequency and vice versa.
  • The Lyapunov exponent changes with $K$ in the same pattern as the imaginary part of the quasinormal modes, meaning the photon-sphere instability timescale carries the same environmental information as the damping.
  • The grey-body factor and total absorption cross-section shift with $K$, so the Hawking radiation spectrum escaping from the black hole is modified by the anisotropic matter.
  • For large $w$ all quantities converge back to Schwarzschild, so $w$ controls how strongly the ambient matter couples to the hole's response.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An immediate testable extension is to compute the same $l=0$ and $l=1$ modes with a direct time-domain or continued-fraction method; those are exactly the modes where the reported WKB error is comparable to the splitting, so an independent method would isolate the physical effect from the approximation error.
  • Because the eikonal relation is generic for massless perturbations of static spherical spacetimes, the same $K$-induced shift should appear in gravitational (Regge-Wheeler/Zerilli) modes, although the paper only writes those equations and does not compute their quasinormal frequencies.
  • If extended to the rotating version of this spacetime, the $K$-splitting would add to the usual Zeeman-like $m$-splitting of Kerr; distinguishing the two would matter for using ringdowns to test general relativity in the presence of ambient matter.
  • The asymmetry between positive and negative $K$ (equal $|K|$ does not give equal $|\delta\omega|$) hints that fitting an observed ringdown with a single $K$ will not trade off cleanly against a mass or charge shift, giving a potential degeneracy-breaking handle.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies scalar and electromagnetic perturbations of a static, spherically symmetric black hole surrounded by an anisotropic matter field, with metric function f(r)=1-2M/r+Q^2/r^2-K/r^{2w}. Setting Q=0, the authors derive the effective potentials, compute quasinormal mode (QNM) frequencies with higher-order WKB methods, estimate the WKB error via Eq. (29), and study the eikonal connection to the shadow radius and Lyapunov exponent. They also compute grey-body factors and total absorption cross sections. The central claim is that a nonzero anisotropy parameter K produces a splitting of QNM frequencies relative to the Schwarzschild case, mirrored in the shadow radius, Lyapunov exponent, and grey-body factors.

Significance. If established, the result provides a concrete phenomenological map between anisotropic-matter hair and ringdown/shadow observables, which is of interest for testing environment effects on black holes. The paper's strengths include the absence of parameter fitting to the target quantities, a quantitative eikonal consistency check (Eq. (42)) verified in Fig. 7, and the explicit reporting of WKB error estimates and optimal-order selections. The main quantitative claim is credible for l>=2, where the WKB errors are tiny compared with the K-induced shifts, and for the geodesic/eikonal sector. However, as detailed below, the l=0 scalar results do not support the unqualified statement in the abstract and Section IV that the splitting is always resolved by the WKB computation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section IV, Eq. (29), Table I, Appendix A] The statement that "the error in the WKB approximation is always negligible compared to the effect of the anisotropic matter field" is contradicted by the l=0 rows of Table I. For l=0 and K=0.2, the error estimate is Delta_i=0.003236, while the real-part shift relative to K=0 is about 0.00238 (2.108% of omega_R^Schw=0.112922). For K=0.01, Delta_i=0.002944 is roughly thirty times larger than the real shift (~9.4e-5). Appendix A/Table III shows that the l=0 WKB sequence is oscillatory (order 6 through 9: 0.109512-0.101414i, 0.111850-0.103934i, 0.115497-0.100653i, 0.127818-0.114581i), so the selected order-7 value is not demonstrably converged. The unqualified abstract claim of QNM splitting is therefore not established for l=0; it is established for l>=2 and for the eikonal sector, where Delta_i is 10^-7 to 10^-6. Please qualify the claim to the modes where the error is small, and ideally confirm the l=0 modes with an independent method, such as time-domain integration or a continued-fraction approach, that does not depend on the WKB order choice.
  2. [Section IV, Eqs. (30)-(31), Tables I-II] The relative deviations delta_omega_R and delta_omega_I are quoted to many significant digits even when the underlying WKB error is much larger than the reported shift. For example, Table I, l=0, K=0.01 lists delta_omega_R=0.082948% while Delta_i is about 0.002944, i.e., nearly two orders of magnitude larger than the real-part shift. Quoting such precision is misleading and hides the fact that the l=0, small-K entries cannot resolve the effect. The tables should either report the error bars propagated from Delta_i alongside each frequency, or present the shifts only for parameter values where the shift exceeds the error estimate.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Tables I and II] The bracket notation for significant-digit errors, e.g., 0.11(0542), is not defined in the text; please state explicitly what the digits in parentheses represent.
  2. [Appendix A, Table III] The 'Error' column in Table III is not defined; if it is the quantity Delta_i from Eq. (29) or a related estimate, the definition should be given in the caption or the appendix text.
  3. [Figure 10] Panels (b) and (c) have identical axis labels (w=2/3, l=1, n=0), and panels (d) and (e) also appear identical; please clarify in the caption which curve or which perturbation type each panel shows.
  4. [Section III.A and references] The name 'Kislev' should be 'Kiselev', both in the text near Eq. (18) and in reference [38].
  5. [Section IV] The statement that 'the limit w -> infinity corresponds to the Schwarzschild case' is only asymptotically true for r>1 unless K=0; for finite r near 1 the term K/r^{2w} does not vanish in that limit. The sentence should be made more precise.
  6. [Appendix B] The appendix derives the Regge-Wheeler/Zerilli potentials and source terms but stops short of computing gravitational QNMs; please state explicitly that gravitational QNM results are left for future work, since the current text implies more than is delivered.
  7. [Abstract and PACS] The 'PACS numbers:' line is empty; either provide the PACS codes or delete the line.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the QNM, shadow, Lyapunov, and grey-body results follow from the stated metric and standard perturbation/geodesic formulas, with no fitted parameter or load-bearing self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is input metric -> perturbation potentials -> WKB quasinormal modes -> geodesic shadow/Lyapunov quantities -> scattering coefficients. The metric f(r)=1-2M/r+Q^2/r^2-K/r^{2w} is given in Eq. (6) as the starting point, taken from cited external solutions. The scalar and electromagnetic potentials, Eqs. (18) and (24), are obtained by direct substitution into the Klein-Gordon and Maxwell equations; they are not fitted to the QNM output. QNM frequencies are computed with the standard higher-order WKB formulas of Eqs. (27)-(28), with the order selection and error estimate defined in Eq. (29); no parameter is adjusted to reproduce the claimed K-splitting. The shadow radius in Eq. (40) and Lyapunov exponent in Eq. (45) are independent geodesic quantities computed from the same f(r), and the eikonal relations (32), (42), and (46) are cited from external theorems, not redefinitions of the paper's own results. Grey-body factors follow from the standard WKB reflection formula, Eqs. (50)-(52). The self-citations present, e.g. Refs. [29] and [59], are ancillary methodological references and do not carry the derivation. The l=0 rows of Table I do show that the WKB error estimate Delta_i is comparable to the reported K-shift, which weakens the unqualified claim in Section IV that the WKB error is always negligible; that is a numerical accuracy limitation, not circularity, because the computed quantities are not constructed from the quantities they are said to predict.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the known anisotropic matter solution and standard perturbation/WKB machinery. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The only parameters scanned are the matter hair K and the equation-of-state parameter w, both inherited from the background solution, so the ledger is light.

free parameters (2)
  • K
    Strength of the anisotropic matter hair in the metric (6). It is scanned over [-0.5,0.5] in the main plots and is a model input, not fitted to the target results.
  • w
    Anisotropy equation-of-state parameter in the metric (6). It is scanned over [0.5,5] and is a model input, not fitted to the target results.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The metric (6) with energy-momentum tensor (7) is a valid solution of the Einstein-Maxwell-anisotropic fluid equations with negative radial pressure.
    Inherited from Refs [26,27,33]; the paper does not re-derive the solution but relies on it as the fixed background for all perturbation calculations.
  • domain assumption The WKB approximation at the selected optimal order yields accurate QNM frequencies for l>=2.
    Used in Section IV; the error estimator Eq (29) is assumed to bound the true error. For l=0 this assumption is questionable, as Table I shows the error comparable to the effect.
  • standard math The eikonal correspondence omega_QNM = Omega_c * l - i(n+1/2)|lambda| (Eq 32) applies to this static spherically symmetric spacetime.
    Known theorem from Ref [54]; used in Section V to connect QNMs, shadow radius, and Lyapunov exponent.
  • standard math In the gravitational perturbation appendix, one may set m=0 and use the Regge-Wheeler gauge, and the matter source perturbations are captured by functions t0, t1, t2.
    Standard harmonic decomposition and gauge choice, cited from Refs [7,22,69]; the appendix does not solve the sourced equations, only presents the formalism.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Perturbations of Black Holes Surrounded by Anisotropic Matter Field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MVJHGXB4

@misc{pith2026241111629,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Perturbations of Black Holes Surrounded by Anisotropic Matter Field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MVJHGXB4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11629}
}
read the original abstract

Our research aims to probe the anisotropic matter field around black holes using black hole perturbation theory. Black holes in the universe are usually surrounded by matter or fields, and it is important to study the perturbation and the characteristic modes of a black hole that coexists with such a matter field. In this study, we focus on a family of black hole solutions to Einstein's equations that extend the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m spacetime to include an anisotropic matter field. In addition to mass and charge, this type of black hole possesses additional hair due to the negative radial pressure of the anisotropic matter. We investigate the perturbations of the massless scalar and electromagnetic fields and calculate the quasinormal modes (QNMs). We also study the critical orbits around the black hole and their properties to investigate the connection between the eikonal QNMs, black hole shadow radius, and Lyapunov exponent. Additionally, we analyze the grey-body factors and scattering coefficients using the perturbation results. Our findings indicate that the presence of anisotropic matter fields leads to a splitting in the QNM frequencies compared to the Schwarzschild case. This splitting feature is also reflected in the shadow radius, Lyapunov exponent, and grey-body factors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11629 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The parameter space of w and K showing regions corresponding to black hole and naked singularity solutions. The solid (blue) curve represents the boundary where the event horizon vanishes. The solutions are illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The behavior of the effective potential for scalar perturbation. Left panel: variation with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The behavior of the effective potential for electromagnetic perturbation. The qualitative behavior [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left panel: Effect of w on QNM frequencies. Right panel: Effect of K on QNM frequencies. The angular mode l = 2 is chosen as it is the lowest mode where the error in WKB method is significantly smaller than the corrections introduced by the anisotropic matter field. V.…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Effect of w on the shadow radius. (b) Effect of K on the shadow radius. (c) Circles representing the shadow radius in celestial coordinates for various K values, with w fixed at w = 2/3. (d) Circles representing the shadow radius in celestial coordinates for variou…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effect of w (left) and K (right) on Lyapunov Exponent. where Veff(r) is given in (37). For an unstable circular geodesic, we have Veff(r) = 0, V ′ eff(r) = 0, and V ′′ eff(r) > 0. From (37), V ′′ eff(rp) = L 2 r 4 p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left: Relation between the shadow radius and real part of QNM in the eikonal limit. Right: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Effect of K (left) and w (right) on grey-body factor for scalar perturbation. The effect of ℓ is also shown on the left. exhibits similar behavior. It can be seen that the larger the K, the larger the grey-body factor, meaning that a smaller portion of particles is ref…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Effect of K (left) and w (right) on total absorption cross section σ vs QNM frequency ω for scalar perturbation. To find σ we have added up to 10 modes from ℓ = 0 to ℓ = 10 anisotropic parameters. The effect of the parameter K is analyzed in 9(a), where splitting behav…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Error estimation in optimal order WKB approximation compared with the effect of anisotropic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Charged black holes embedded in matter with anisotropic pressure: Horizon Structure and Quasinormal Mode Spectra

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Anisotropic fluid around a charged black hole (Kiselev metric) produces long-lived scalar quasinormal modes, avoided crossings, and spectral reorganization, computed via an extended Leaver method with automatic differ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [7]

    Regge and J

    T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity , Phys. Rev. 108 (1957) 1063

    work page 1957

  2. [1]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102 [ 1602.03837]. 31

    arXiv 2016

  3. [2]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Tests of general relativity with GW150914 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 221101 [ 1602.03841]

    arXiv 2016

  4. [3]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 241103 [ 1606.04855]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [4]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole , Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L4 [ 1906.11241]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [5]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole , Astrophys. J. 875 (2019) L1 [ 1906.11238]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [6]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring , Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L5 [ 1906.11242]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    L. A. Edelstein and C. V. Vishveshwara, Differential equations for perturbations on the schwarzschild metric, Phys. Rev. D 1 (1970) 3514

    work page 1970

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    F. J. Zerilli, Effective potential for even parity Regge-Wheeler gravitational perturbation equations , Phys. Rev. Lett. 24 (1970) 737

    1970

  2. [10]

    Castellani, A

    L. Castellani, A. Ceresole, R. D’Auria and P. Fr´ e, eds., Tullio Regge: An Eclectic Genius: From Quantum Gravity to Computer Play . World Scientific, 9, 2019, 10.1142/11643

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    R. H. Price and J. Pullin, Colliding black holes: The Close limit , Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 3297 [gr-qc/9402039]

    1994 arXiv

  4. [12]

    A. M. Abrahams and G. B. Cook, Collisions of boosted black holes: perturbation theory prediction of gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) R2364 [ gr-qc/9405051]

    1994 arXiv

  5. [13]

    A. M. Abrahams, S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky, Calculation of gravitational wave forms from black hole collisions and disk collapse: Applying perturbation theory to numerical space-times , Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 4295 [ gr-qc/9408036]

    1995 arXiv

  6. [14]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes , Living Rev. Rel. 2 (1999) 2 [ gr-qc/9909058]

    1999 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes , Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 163001 [ 0905.2975]

    2009 arXiv

  8. [16]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 793 [ 1102.4014]

    2011 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Chandrasekhar and S

    S. Chandrasekhar and S. L. Detweiler, The quasi-normal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 344 (1975) 441

    1975

  10. [18]

    C. V. Vishveshwara, Scattering of Gravitational Radiation by a Schwarzschild Black-hole , Nature 227 (1970) 936

    1970

  11. [19]

    E. S. C. Ching, P. T. Leung, A. Maassen van den Brink, W. M. Suen, S. S. Tong and K. Young, Quasinormal-mode expansion for waves in open systems , Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 (1998) 1545 [gr-qc/9904017]. 32

    1998 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Nollert and R

    H.-P. Nollert and R. H. Price, Quantifying excitations of quasinormal mode systems , J. Math. Phys. 40 (1999) 980 [ gr-qc/9810074]

    1999 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class

    H.-P. Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: Quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars, Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999) R159

    1999

  14. [22]

    Nagar and L

    A. Nagar and L. Rezzolla, Gauge-invariant non-spherical metric perturbations of Schwarzschild black-hole spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) R167 [ gr-qc/0502064]

    2005 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Ferrari and L

    V. Ferrari and L. Gualtieri, Quasi-Normal Modes and Gravitational Wave Astronomy , Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 (2008) 945 [ 0709.0657]

    2008 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. A. H. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers and E. Herlt, Exact solutions of Einstein ’s field equations, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003, 10.1017/CBO9780511535185

    2003 doi

  17. [25]

    M. S. R. Delgaty and K. Lake, Physical acceptability of isolated, static, spherically symmetric, perfect fluid solutions of Einstein ’s equations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 115 (1998) 395 [ gr-qc/9809013]

    1998 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Kim, B.-H

    H.-C. Kim, B.-H. Lee, W. Lee and Y. Lee, Rotating black holes with an anisotropic matter field , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 064067 [ 1912.09709]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Cho and H.-C

    I. Cho and H.-C. Kim, Simple black holes with anisotropic fluid , Chin. Phys. C 43 (2019) 025101 [1703.01103]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Bad ´ ıa and E

    J. Bad ´ ıa and E. F. Eiroa,Influence of an anisotropic matter field on the shadow of a rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 024066 [ 2005.03690]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    C. L. Ahmed Rizwan, A. Naveena Kumara, K. Hegde, M. S. Ali and K. M. Ajith, Rotating black hole with an anisotropic matter field as a particle accelerator , Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 075030 [2008.01426]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Kim and Y

    H.-C. Kim and Y. Lee, Spherically Symmetric Wormholes with anisotropic matter , JCAP 09 (2019) 001 [1905.10050]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity , Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2752

    1977

  24. [32]

    S. W. Hawking and S. F. Ross, Duality between electric and magnetic black holes , Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 5865 [ hep-th/9504019]

    1995 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Kiselev, Quintessence and black holes , Class

    V. Kiselev, Quintessence and black holes , Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) 1187 [ gr-qc/0210040]

    2003 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Zwicky, Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln , Helv

    F. Zwicky, Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln , Helv. Phys. Acta 6 (1933) 110

    1933

  27. [35]

    V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr., Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions, Astrophys. J. 159 (1970) 379

    1970

  28. [36]

    Zou and Y

    D.-C. Zou and Y. S. Myung, Scalar hairy black holes in Einstein-Maxwell-conformally coupled scalar theory, Phys. Lett. B 803 (2020) 135332 [ 1911.08062]

    2020 arXiv

  29. [37]

    B.-H. Lee, W. Lee and Y. S. Myung, Shadow cast by a rotating black hole with anisotropic matter , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 064026 [ 2101.04862]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Chen and J.-l

    S.-b. Chen and J.-l. Jing, Quasinormal modes of a black hole surrounded by quintessence , Class. 33 Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 4651 [ gr-qc/0511085]

    2005 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Cardoso and J

    V. Cardoso and J. P. S. Lemos, Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild anti-de Sitter black holes: Electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 084017 [ gr-qc/0105103]

    2001 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Dey and S

    S. Dey and S. Chakrabarti, A note on electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations of the Bardeen de Sitter black hole: quasinormal modes and greybody factors , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 504 [1807.09065]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Chandrasekhar, The mathematical theory of black holes

    S. Chandrasekhar, The mathematical theory of black holes . 1985

    1985

  34. [42]

    B. F. Schutz and C. M. Will, Black hole normal modes - A semianalytic approach , Astrophys. J. Lett. 291 (1985) L33

    1985

  35. [43]

    Iyer and C

    S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 1. Foundations and Application of a Higher Order WKB Analysis of Potential Barrier Scattering , Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 3621

    1987

  36. [44]

    R. A. Konoplya, Quasinormal behavior of the d-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole and higher order WKB approach, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 024018 [ gr-qc/0303052]

    2003 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Matyjasek and M

    J. Matyjasek and M. Opala, Quasinormal modes of black holes. The improved semianalytic approach , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 024011 [ 1704.00361]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko and A. F. Zinhailo, Higher order WKB formula for quasinormal modes and grey-body factors: recipes for quick and accurate calculations , Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 155002 [1904.10333]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    E. W. Leaver, An Analytic representation for the quasi normal modes of Kerr black holes , Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 402 (1985) 285

    1985

  40. [48]

    M. D. ´Ciri´ c, N. Konjik and A. Samsarov,Noncommutative scalar quasinormal modes of the Reissner–Nordstr¨ om black hole, Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 175005 [ 1708.04066]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Dimitrijevi´ c´Ciri´ c, N

    M. Dimitrijevi´ c´Ciri´ c, N. Konjik and A. Samsarov,Noncommutative scalar field in the nonextremal Reissner-Nordstr¨ om background: Quasinormal mode spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 116009 [1904.04053]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Herceg, T

    N. Herceg, T. Juri´ c, A. Samsarov and I. Smoli´ c,Metric perturbations in noncommutative gravity , JHEP 06 (2024) 130 [ 2310.06038]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. F. Schutz, Black Hole Normal Modes: A WKB Approach. 3. The Reissner-Nordstrom Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 3378

    1988

  44. [52]

    E. W. Leaver, Quasinormal modes of Reissner-Nordstrom black holes , Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 2986

    1990

  45. [53]

    M. S. Churilova, Black holes in Einstein-aether theory: Quasinormal modes and time-domain evolution, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 024076 [ 2002.03450]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Cardoso, A

    V. Cardoso, A. S. Miranda, E. Berti, H. Witek and V. T. Zanchin, Geodesic stability, Lyapunov exponents and quasinormal modes , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064016 [ 0812.1806]

    2009 arXiv

  47. [55]

    J. L. Synge, The Escape of Photons from Gravitationally Intense Stars , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 131 (1966) 463

    1966

  48. [56]

    J. P. Luminet, Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk , Astron. Astrophys. 75 (1979) 34 228

    1979

  49. [57]

    I. Z. Stefanov, S. S. Yazadjiev and G. G. Gyulchev, Connection between Black-Hole Quasinormal Modes and Lensing in the Strong Deflection Limit , Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 251103 [ 1003.1609]

    2010 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Jusufi, Quasinormal Modes of Black Holes Surrounded by Dark Matter and Their Connection with the Shadow Radius , Phys

    K. Jusufi, Quasinormal Modes of Black Holes Surrounded by Dark Matter and Their Connection with the Shadow Radius , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 084055 [ 1912.13320]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    A. N. Kumara, S. Punacha and M. S. Ali, Lyapunov exponents and phase structure of Lifshitz and hyperscaling violating black holes , JCAP 07 (2024) 061 [ 2401.05181]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. F. Zinhailo, Grey-body factors and Hawking radiation of black holes in 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Lett. B 810 (2020) 135793 [ 2004.02248]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. F. Zinhailo and Z. Stuchlik, Quasinormal modes and Hawking radiation of black holes in cubic gravity , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 044023 [ 2006.10462]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    R. A. Konoplya, Quasinormal modes and grey-body factors of regular black holes with a scalar hair from the Effective Field Theory , JCAP 07 (2023) 001 [ 2305.09187]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Zhang and Y

    Y. Zhang and Y. X. Gui, Quasinormal modes of a Schwarzschild black hole surrounded by quintessence, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 6141 [ gr-qc/0612009]

    2006 arXiv

  56. [64]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Gravitational spectrum of black holes in the Einstein-Aether theory , Phys. Lett. B 648 (2007) 236 [ hep-th/0611226]

    2007 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Ding, Gravitational quasinormal modes of black holes in Einstein-aether theory , Nucl

    C. Ding, Gravitational quasinormal modes of black holes in Einstein-aether theory , Nucl. Phys. B 938 (2019) 736 [ 1812.07994]

    2019 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Y. Yang, D. Liu, A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Z.-W. Long and Z. Xu,Probing hairy black holes caused by gravitational decoupling using quasinormal modes and greybody bounds , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 064042 [2203.11551]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [67]

    K. S. Thorne, Multipole Expansions of Gravitational Radiation , Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (1980) 299

    1980

  60. [68]

    C. V. Vishveshwara, Stability of the schwarzschild metric , Phys. Rev. D 1 (1970) 2870

    1970

  61. [69]

    F. J. Zerilli, Perturbation analysis for gravitational and electromagnetic radiation in a reissner-nordstroem geometry, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 860. 35

    1974

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.