Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Coherent States in Gauge Theories: Topological Defects and Other Classical Configurations

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A gauge-theory vortex is a BRST-invariant coherent state built on the vacuum, with its topological charge realized as an infinite occupation number of zero-momentum Goldstone modes.

desk verdict A useful but conditional step in the corpuscular program: the pure-gauge piece is solid, the Nielsen-Olesen state lacks a finite-energy proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11657 v1 pith:4ZS4GJ6I submitted 2024-11-18 hep-th quant-ph

Lasha Berezhiani , Gia Dvali , Otari Sakhelashvili This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thquant-ph
keywords coherentstatesBRSTquantizationNielsen-Olesenstringtopologicalchargezero-momentummodesGoldstonebosonspure-gaugeconfigurationsinstantons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that classical configurations in gauge theories need not be added by hand; they can be built as coherent states on the vacuum of a BRST-quantized theory. The central example is the Nielsen-Olesen string, which the authors construct as a BRST-invariant coherent state combining a magnetic-field displacement, a gauge-invariant scalar dressing, and a winding generated by the spontaneously broken charge. In that state the topological charge is carried by an infinite occupation number of zero-momentum Goldstone modes, so sectors of different winding are orthogonal even though the string has finite energy per unit length. The same formalism shows that pure-gauge configurations are BRST-invariant coherent states: they are physically equivalent to the vacuum for S-matrix elements while changing gauge-variant expectation values. If the construction is valid, it unifies the quantum description of solitons, instantons, and possibly coordinate reparameterizations in gravity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the BRST-invariant coherent-state Ansatz applied to the vacuum of quantized electrodynamics. For matter, the paper uses dressed operators $\hat\Phi_g = \hat\Phi e^{-ig\nabla^{-2}\partial_j\hat A_j}$ and the corresponding dressed momentum; these make any matter coherent state automatically BRST-invariant while dressing it with the required photon cloud. For the string, the full state (47) stacks an electric-field displacement $e^{-i\int A^c_j\hat E_j}$, a winding factor generated by the charge density $i(\hat\Phi\hat\Pi-\hat\Pi^\dagger\hat\Phi^\dagger)$ of the broken U(1), and a gauge-invariant scalar displacement. The master gauge condition (26) ties the time evolution of $\langle\hat A_0\rangle$ to the divergence of $\langle\hat A_j\rangle$ for every physical state. The identity (36) turns pure-gauge coherent states into vacuum-plus-BRST-exact states, and the mode expansion (51) turns the topological charge into a singular limit of Goldstone creation operators.

What would settle it

Compute the exact expectation value $\langle S_{NO}|\hat H|S_{NO}\rangle$ for the state (47), keeping the electric-field-dependent terms in $\hat\Pi_g$, and search over squeezing and non-Gaussian parameters for a finite result matching the classical Nielsen-Olesen energy; if none exists, the proposed state is not the quantum description of the string.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a topologically non-trivial classical configuration such as the Nielsen-Olesen string is a genuine quantum state of the gauge theory, not merely a classical background. Concretely, the state (47) is built by acting on the BRST-invariant vacuum with three operators: the electromagnetic displacement that sets the vector-potential winding, the charge-density operator that winds the phase of the Higgs field, and a displacement by gauge-invariant dressed scalar operators that sets the vortex modulus. BRST invariance follows from the use of gauge-invariant operators, and the one-point functions reproduce the classical vortex. The paper then shows that the topological charge of this state is an infinite occupation number of zero-momentum Goldstone modes, which makes different winding sectors orthogonal and explains why transitions between them are suppressed. It also establishes that pure-gauge configurations admit such coherent states and are physically equivalent to the vacuum modulo BRST-exact states.

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes that the divergences appearing in the energy of the string state can be removed by adding squeezing and non-Gaussian modifications without destroying the state's BRST invariance; if no such finite-energy deformation exists, the explicit state (47) does not describe the string.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Different topological sectors are orthogonal at the full quantum level, because they carry an infinite relative occupation number of zero-momentum Goldstone modes.
  • Transitions between winding sectors are suppressed by this infinite occupation-number gap; the same mechanism, with finite occupation differences, gives finite instanton transition rates in lower-dimensional analogs.
  • Pure-gauge configurations become physical coherent states that are S-matrix-equivalent to the vacuum but alter gauge-variant expectation values, so the chosen master gauge fixes background and perturbations together.
  • The Nielsen-Olesen string has finite energy despite its infinite topological occupation number because the zero-momentum deformations carrying the charge are locally pure gauge and cost no energy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive test would be to numerically construct the finite-energy squeezed version of the string state; the paper posits its existence but does not display it.
  • The same construction could be attempted for non-Abelian vortices and monopoles, where dressing operators are non-commutative and the topological-charge occupation-number analysis is more involved.
  • If the master-gauge logic carries over to gravity, diffeomorphism-equivalent spacetimes would differ as coherent states but agree for gauge-invariant observables; the paper flags this analogy without constructing it.
  • One could check on a lattice whether the regulated finite-volume formula (54) indeed produces orthogonality of winding sectors through zero-mode occupation numbers as the volume grows.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a BRST-invariant coherent-state description of classical configurations in Abelian gauge theory. It constructs coherent states for classical sources, introduces Dirac-dressed scalar operators to build BRST-invariant matter states, and derives a double-scaling limit in which the dressed state factorizes into independent scalar and gauge coherent states. It then considers pure-gauge configurations and argues that, using Eq. (35), such states are equivalent to the vacuum up to a BRST-exact term. The main new result is an explicit coherent-state ansatz, Eq. (47), for the Nielsen-Olesen string, together with an interpretation of topological charge as an infinite occupation number of zero-momentum Goldstone modes and a qualitative generalization to instantons.

Significance. If the construction can be completed, the paper would provide an explicit quantum-state realization of a topological soliton in a gauge-fixed quantum field theory, with a clear mechanism for orthogonality of topological sectors and a useful dictionary between classical backgrounds and BRST-invariant coherent states. The exact time evolution in Eq. (14), the commutator algebra around the dressed operators (17)-(18), and the factorization in Eq. (25) are clean and reproducible computations that support the framework. The advertised Nielsen-Olesen state, however, is not yet shown to be a physically admissible state, so the significance of the central claim is conditional on completing that step.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 7, Eq. (47)] The paper's central claim is that Eq. (47) is a BRST-invariant coherent-state realization of the Nielsen-Olesen string, but it never verifies that this state has finite energy per unit length or lies in the domain of the Hamiltonian. The only energy discussion is in Sec. 7, after Eq. (46), where the authors state that the |Π_g|^2 terms produce 'what seem to be (unrenormalizable) singularities ... In this work, we simply assume that such adjustments are possible' via squeezing and non-Gaussian modifications. This is load-bearing: if those singularities cannot be absorbed by local counterterms while preserving BRST invariance and the expectation values, then the explicit state (47) is not a valid quantum description of the string, and the paper offers no alternative. The assumption must be turned into a construction or at least a well-posed existence argument.
  2. [Sec. 6, Eq. (35)] Equation (35) states that (J_0 - ρ_vac)|Ω⟩ = 0 and is used as an exact identity to derive Eq. (36), the equivalence of pure-gauge coherent states with the vacuum. The text only says this is 'straightforward to verify to the leading order in perturbation theory.' Since the equivalence of pure-gauge states to the vacuum is a key step in the topological-sector argument, the paper should either prove the identity exactly (for example, by defining ρ_vac as the full counterterm satisfying the renormalization condition) or explain why leading-order verification is sufficient. As written, the step is an unproven assumption.
  3. [Sec. 8, Eqs. (51)-(56)] The occupation-number interpretation of topological charge relies on an infrared limit for the charge operator and on the overlap formula (54). The paper should specify the order of limits between the mass regulator m, the volume R, and the momentum k -> 0 in the regulated computation, since the claim that the vacua become strictly orthogonal while the energy stays finite depends on that order. Without this specification, the argument that the infinite occupation number is compatible with the mass gap remains qualitative.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and header] There are several typographical and grammatical errors: 'T opological' in the title header, 'as of consistent quantum description' in the abstract, and 'makes number of features' should be 'makes a number of features'. These should be corrected.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eq. (21)] The statement that the O(g^2) correction to ⟨C_g|Φ|C_g⟩ is 'infinite' because of the photon correlator at coincidence is made without showing the explicit divergent factor; a short derivation or citation would help the reader see why this is a field-strength renormalization rather than a state-dependent physical effect.
  3. [Sec. 6, Eqs. (28)-(29)] The notation is unclear at Eq. (29): the surface term ∂_j(α E_j) is kept explicitly, but its cancellation with the surface term in Eq. (32) is described in words. Displaying the cancellation in an equation would make the argument easier to follow.
  4. [Sec. 9] The instanton generalization is essentially qualitative; the mapping to 2+1-dimensional vortices is plausible, but the paper should state more clearly what is established beyond a heuristic analogy, given that no explicit instanton coherent state is written down.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the coherent-state constructions are explicit commutator-based derivations, and the paper's stated assumptions (finite-energy squeezing and leading-order Eq. (35)) are conditional premises rather than circular inputs.

full rationale

The paper does not fit parameters and then rename them as predictions. Its central objects are coherent states whose c-number data are the classical field profiles by definition; the nontrivial content is BRST invariance and the consequent physicality, which are verified by direct commutator manipulations. For example, the pure-gauge result (36) is derived through the equations of motion and the BRST-charge algebra, not assumed. The main assumptions are explicitly acknowledged: Eq. (35), used to identify the vacuum charge, is stated to be 'straightforward to verify to the leading order in perturbation theory,' and the removal of singularities in the energy expectation value is left as an assumption ('In this work, we simply assume that such adjustments are possible'). These are gaps in proof or correctness risks, not circular reductions. The self-citations to [5], [11], and [13] supply prior framework ingredients such as Dirac dressing and the occupation-number interpretation of topological charge; the present paper re-derives the key occupation-number statements in Sec. 8 through an explicit Goldstone-mode computation, so the argument does not reduce to the citations themselves. No equation is shown to be equivalent to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The construction leans on the BRST framework and on several assumptions: the exactness of (J_0 - rho_vac)|Omega> = 0, the existence of finite-energy squeezing corrections, and the master gauge condition. No numerical constants are fitted to data, but the classical background profiles are chosen rather than derived. The axioms are either standard field theory or explicitly flagged in the text.

free parameters (3)
  • Nielsen-Olesen profile functions f(rho), alpha(x), A_j^c(x)
    These classical profiles are put in by hand to reproduce the vortex solution; the quantum state is built around them, so the paper does not derive the string solution from the quantum dynamics.
  • vacuum charge counter-term rho_vac
    Introduced in Eq. (31) to cancel the infinite vacuum charge; appears in Eq. (35) whose exact validity is only checked at leading order.
  • gauge-fixing parameter xi
    Standard gauge parameter in the BRST Lagrangian (Eq. 1); physical results should not depend on it, but it enters the coherent state evolution (Eq. 14).
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption BRST physicality condition Q|f> = 0 defines the physical Hilbert space
    Standard Kugo-Ojima BRST quantization [28]; this is the backbone of the entire construction, first invoked in Eq. (2).
  • ad hoc to paper (J_0 - rho_vac)|Omega> = 0 holds exactly (Eq. 35)
    The paper says this is straightforward to verify to the leading order in perturbation theory, but the exact identity is needed to prove the pure-gauge state is equivalent to the vacuum in Eq. (36).
  • ad hoc to paper Squeezing and non-Gaussian modifications can make the string state's energy finite
    Sec. 7 says 'we simply assume that such adjustments are possible' after finding apparent unrenormalizable singularities in the Hamiltonian expectation value.
  • domain assumption Master gauge condition d0<A0> = dj<Aj> applies to all physical states (Eq. 26)
    Derived from the gauge-fixing terms and used to constrain the time evolution of the one-point functions; it underlies the pure-gauge discussion.
  • domain assumption The charge operator of the spontaneously broken U(1) generates excursions along the vacuum manifold
    Used in Eqs. (40) and (53) to produce winding states and the Goldstone coherent-state picture.
  • domain assumption The change of winding number in the vortex sector costs infinite energy, while in 1+1 dimensions it is finite
    Standard topological reasoning used in Secs. 8 and 9 to distinguish vortex topological charge from instanton tunneling.
  • domain assumption Instantons of the 1+1 dimensional Higgs theory correspond to Nielsen-Olesen vortices in 2+1 dimensions [40]
    Borrowed from [40]; it is the basis for the instanton generalization in Sec. 9.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coherent States in Gauge Theories: Topological Defects and Other Classical Configurations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4ZS4GJ6I

@misc{pith2026241111657,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coherent States in Gauge Theories: Topological Defects and Other Classical Configurations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4ZS4GJ6I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11657}
}
read the original abstract

We present a formulation of coherent states as of consistent quantum description of classical configurations in the BRST-invariant quantization of electrodynamics. The quantization with proper gauge-fixing is performed on the vacuum of the theory, whereas other backgrounds are obtained as BRST-invariant coherent states. One of the key insights is the possibility of constructing the coherent states of pure-gauge configurations. This provides a coherent state understanding of topologically non-trivial configurations in gauge theories, and makes number of features, such as the suppression of transitions between topologically-distinct sectors, very transparent at full quantum level. As an example, we construct the Nielsen-Olesen string as a BRST-invariant coherent state. The Abelian pure-gauge configurations can also be viewed as useful analogs for a set of space-times related by coordinate reparameterizations in General Relativity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Effective Actions for Domain Wall Dynamics

    hep-th 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The effective action for domain walls, including higher-curvature corrections and a bound-state coupling to worldsheet curvature, is derived from the scalar field theory and matched to lattice simulations.

  2. On Time-Evolution in Quantum Gravity

    hep-th 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The bulk Hamiltonian of BRST-quantized gravity is shown to be BRST-exact (H = Mpl∫{Q,iΠc0}) yet still produces the correct time evolution of bulk correlators of gauge-variant operators.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [5]

    Towards a Qua ntum Theory of Solitons,

    G. Dvali, C. Gomez, L. Gruending and T. Rug, “Towards a Qua ntum Theory of Solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B 901, 338-353 (2015) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.10.017 [a rXiv:1508.03074 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2015

  2. [11]

    de Sitter space as a BRST-invariant coherent state of gravitons,

    L. Berezhiani, G. Dvali and O. Sakhelashvili, “de Sitter space as a BRST-invariant coherent state of gravitons,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.2, 025022 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.025022 [arXiv:2111.12022 [hep-th]]. 18

    arXiv 2022

  3. [13]

    Perturbat ive construction of coherent states,

    L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia and M. Zantedeschi, “Perturbat ive construction of coherent states,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.8, 085018 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.085018 [a rXiv:2311.18650 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [1]

    Black Hole’s Quantum N-Portrait,

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez, “Black Hole’s Quantum N-Portrait,” Fortsch. Phys. 61, 742-767 (2013) doi:10.1002/prop.201300001 [arXiv:1112.3359 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2013

  5. [2]

    Black Holes as Critical Point of Qua ntum Phase Transition,

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez, “Black Holes as Critical Point of Qua ntum Phase Transition,” Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2752 (2014) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2752-3 [arXiv :1207.4059 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [3]

    Quantum Compositeness of Gravity : Black Holes, AdS and Inflation,

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez, “Quantum Compositeness of Gravity : Black Holes, AdS and Inflation,” JCAP 01, 023 (2014) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/01/023 [arXiv:1 312.4795 [hep-th]]

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/01/023 2014

  7. [4]

    Quantum Exclusion of Positive Cos mological Constant?,

    G. Dvali and C. Gomez, “Quantum Exclusion of Positive Cos mological Constant?,” Annalen Phys. 528, 68-73 (2016) doi:10.1002/andp.201500216 [arXiv:1412.8 077 [hep-th]]

    doi:10.1002/andp.201500216 2016

  8. [6]

    On Corpuscular Theory of Inflation

    L. Berezhiani, “On Corpuscular Theory of Inflation,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, no.2, 106 (2017) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4672-5 [arXiv:1610.08433 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

Show all 40 references
  1. [7]

    Quantum Break-Time of de Si tter,

    G. Dvali, C. Gomez and S. Zell, “Quantum Break-Time of de Si tter,” JCAP 06, 028 (2017) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/06/028 [arXiv:1701.08776 [ hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Entropy Bound and Unitarity of Scattering Ampl itudes,

    G. Dvali, “Entropy Bound and Unitarity of Scattering Ampl itudes,” JHEP 03, 126 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)126 [arXiv:2003.05546 [hep-th ]]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Evolution of coherent states as quantum counterpart of classical dynamics,

    L. Berezhiani and M. Zantedeschi, “Evolution of coherent states as quantum counterpart of classical dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 104, no.8, 085007 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.085007 [arXiv:2011.11229 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Background -field method and initial- time singularity for coherent states,

    L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia and M. Zantedeschi, “Background -field method and initial- time singularity for coherent states,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.4, 045003 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.045003 [arXiv:2108.13235 [he p-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Perturbative understanding of nonperturbative processes and quantumization versus classicalization,

    G. Dvali and L. Eisemann, “Perturbative understanding of nonperturbative processes and quantumization versus classicalization,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.12, 125019 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.125019 [arXiv:2211.02618 [he p-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Consiste nt Canonical Quantization of Gravity: Recovery of Classical GR from BRST-invariant Coherent State s,

    L. Berezhiani, G. Dvali and O. Sakhelashvili, “Consiste nt Canonical Quantization of Gravity: Recovery of Classical GR from BRST-invariant Coherent State s,” [arXiv:2409.18777 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    Coherent and incoherent states of the ra diation field,

    R. J. Glauber, “Coherent and incoherent states of the ra diation field,” Phys. Rev. 131, 2766-2788 (1963) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766

    1963 doi

  8. [16]

    Equivalence of semiclassical and q uantum mechanical descriptions of sta- tistical light beams,

    E. C. G. Sudarshan, “Equivalence of semiclassical and q uantum mechanical descriptions of sta- tistical light beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 277-279 (1963) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.277

    1963 doi

  9. [17]

    Frequency Shift in High-Intensity Comp ton Scattering,

    T. W. B. Kibble, “Frequency Shift in High-Intensity Comp ton Scattering,” Phys. Rev. 138, B740-B753 (1965) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.138.B740

    1965 doi

  10. [18]

    Coherent States: Th eory and Some Applications,

    W. M. Zhang, D. Feng and R. Gilmore, “Coherent States: Th eory and Some Applications,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 867-927 (1990) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.62.867

    1990 doi

  11. [19]

    Coherent states in field theory,

    W. M. Zhang, “Coherent states in field theory,” [arXiv:h ep-th/9908117 [hep-th]]

  12. [20]

    A Microscopic Model of Holography: Survival by the Burden of Memory,

    G. Dvali, “A Microscopic Model of Holography: Survival by the Burden of Memory,” [arXiv:1810.02336 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Black hole m etamorphosis and stabilization by memory burden,

    G. Dvali, L. Eisemann, M. Michel and S. Zell, “Black hole m etamorphosis and stabilization by memory burden,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.10, 103523 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103523 [arXiv:2006.00011 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Scrambling in the Black Hole Portrait,

    G. Dvali, D. Flassig, C. Gomez, A. Pritzel and N. Winterg erst, “Scrambling in the Black Hole Portrait,” Phys. Rev. D 88, no.12, 124041 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.124041 [arXiv:1307.3458 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Unitarity Entropy Bound: Solitons and Instan tons,

    G. Dvali, “Unitarity Entropy Bound: Solitons and Instan tons,” Fortsch. Phys. 69, no.1, 2000091 (2021) doi:10.1002/prop.202000091 [arXiv:1907.07332 [h ep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Area Law Saturation of Entropy Bound from Pert urbative Unitarity in Renor- malizable Theories,

    G. Dvali, “Area Law Saturation of Entropy Bound from Pert urbative Unitarity in Renor- malizable Theories,” Fortsch. Phys. 69, no.1, 2000090 (2021) doi:10.1002/prop.202000090 [arXiv:1906.03530 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Black hole formation and classicalization in ultra-Planckian 2→N scattering,

    G. Dvali, C. Gomez, R. S. Isermann, D. Lüst and S. Stieber ger, “Black hole formation and classicalization in ultra-Planckian 2→N scattering,” Nucl. Phys. B 893, 187-235 (2015) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2015.02.004 [arXiv:1409.7405 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Glimpses of blac k hole forma- tion/evaporation in highly inelastic, ultra-planckian st ring collisions,

    A. Addazi, M. Bianchi and G. Veneziano, “Glimpses of blac k hole forma- tion/evaporation in highly inelastic, ultra-planckian st ring collisions,” JHEP 02, 111 (2017) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)111 [arXiv:1611.03643 [hep-th ]]. 19

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    S-Matrix and Anomaly of de Sitter,

    G. Dvali, “ S-Matrix and Anomaly of de Sitter,” Symmetry 13, no.1, 3 (2020) doi:10.3390/sym13010003 [arXiv:2012.02133 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Local Covariant Operator Formali sm of Nonabelian Gauge The- ories and Quark Confinement Problem,

    T. Kugo and I. Ojima, “Local Covariant Operator Formali sm of Nonabelian Gauge The- ories and Quark Confinement Problem,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Sup pl. 66, 1-130 (1979) doi:10.1143/PTPS.66.1

    1979 doi

  21. [29]

    The quantum theory of fields. Vol. 2: Moder n applications

    S. Weinberg, “The quantum theory of fields. Vol. 2: Moder n applications”, Cambridge, UK: University Press (1996)

    1996

  22. [30]

    Can infrared gravitons scree n Lambda?,

    J. Garriga and T. Tanaka, “Can infrared gravitons scree n Lambda?,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 024021 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.024021 [arXiv:0706.029 5 [hep-th]]

    2008 doi

  23. [31]

    Solitons as Infinite Constituent Bound Sta tes,

    J. G. Taylor, “Solitons as Infinite Constituent Bound Sta tes,” Annals Phys. 115, 153 (1978) doi:10.1016/0003-4916(78)90179-3

    1978 doi

  24. [32]

    Q uantum oscillons may be long-lived,

    J. Evslin, T. Romańczukiewicz and A. Wereszczyński, “Q uantum oscillons may be long-lived,” JHEP 08, 182 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)182 [arXiv:2305.18 056 [hep-th]]

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    Reflection coefficient of a reflectio nless kink,

    J. Evslin and H. Liu, “Reflection coefficient of a reflectio nless kink,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.8, 085019 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.085019 [arXiv:2 402.17968 [hep-th]]

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    Perturbative approach to ti me-dependent quantum solitons,

    K. Ogundipe and J. Evslin, “Perturbative approach to ti me-dependent quantum solitons,” JHEP 06, 174 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2024)174 [arXiv:2403.13 232 [hep-th]]

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    A Finite Tension fo r the φ4 4 Domain Wall,

    J. Evslin, H. Liu, B. Zhang and H. Guo, “A Finite Tension fo r the φ4 4 Domain Wall,” [arXiv:2411.05406 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Counting Photons in Static Electric and Magne tic Fields,

    W. Mück, “Counting Photons in Static Electric and Magne tic Fields,” Eur. Phys. J. C 73, no.12, 2679 (2013) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2679-0 [arXiv: 1310.6909 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Photons in a Ball,

    W. Mück, “Photons in a Ball,” Eur. Phys. J. C 75, no.12, 585 (2015) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 015-3811-0 [arXiv:1510.04490 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Vortex Line Models for Dual S trings,

    H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, “Vortex Line Models for Dual S trings,” Nucl. Phys. B 61, 45-61 (1973) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(73)90350-7

    1973 doi

  31. [39]

    Classical Limit of Black H ole Quantum N-Portrait and BMS Symmetry,

    G. Dvali, C. Gomez and D. Lüst, “Classical Limit of Black H ole Quantum N-Portrait and BMS Symmetry,” Phys. Lett. B 753, 173-177 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.073 [arXiv:1509.02114 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Localization of gauge fields and monopole tunnelling,

    G. Dvali, H. B. Nielsen and N. Tetradis, “Localization of gauge fields and monopole tunnelling,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 085005 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.085005 [arXiv:0 710.5051 [hep-th]]. 20

    2008 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.