Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 125 references

Glueball Axion-Like Particles

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a pseudoscalar glueball from a dark Yang-Mills sector, called a GALP, is a viable axion-like dark matter candidate whose photon coupling follows a definite mass-coupling line when it makes up all of the dark matter.

desk verdict A readable, honest EFT phenomenology paper that extends the same authors' earlier GALP proposal with new constraints and an appendix, but the headline mass-coupling relation rests on an unchecked thermal-history assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11716 v1 pith:LDVAT5YR submitted 2024-11-18 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th

Pierluca Carenza , Roman Pasechnik , Zhi-Wei Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COhep-th
keywords glueballdarkmatterpseudoscalaraxion-likeparticlesYang-Millssectordimension-8operatormass-couplingrelationsupernovabounds
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that the lightest pseudoscalar glueball of a confining dark Yang-Mills sector behaves like an axion-like particle, called a GALP, and can account for all of the dark matter. The authors derive the effective low-energy theory of scalar and pseudoscalar glueballs, and show that a dimension-8 gauge portal coupling dark gluons to photons and QCD gluons becomes, after confinement, a set of very weak axion-like couplings. Because the dark sector passes through a first-order confinement-deconfinement transition, the relic abundance depends mainly on the dark confinement scale; combining that with the temperature ratio set by a heavy mediator produces a definite mass-coupling relation for GALP dark matter. If the relation holds, GALPs occupy a largely unexplored corner of the axion-photon parameter space: masses above roughly 120 MeV, couplings far weaker than canonical QCD axions, and effective Peccei-Quinn scales that can be super-Planckian. The paper therefore gives concrete search targets for photon-line, supernova, and beam-dump experiments.

What carries the argument

The central object is the GALP, a pseudoscalar glueball $0^{-+}$ of a confining dark SU(N) sector, whose mass is tied to the dark confinement scale by $m_{\rm GALP}\simeq 6\Lambda$. Three ingredients carry the argument: the dimension-8 gauge portal of Eq. (11), which couples dark gluons to photons with strength $\epsilon^2\kappa(\Lambda/M_\Psi)^4$ after confinement and similarly couples dark gluons to QCD gluons; the glueball effective potential of Eq. (7), constrained by the dilatation anomaly, which fixes the spectrum and the order-one normalization $\kappa$; and the relic-abundance formula of Eq. (9) together with the temperature ratio of Eq. (21), which converts the confinement scale into the observed dark-matter density and, with Eq. (13), into the mass-coupling relation of Eq. (22). The role of $\kappa$ is to absorb the matrix-element normalizations from the glueball effective theory, so the prediction is parametric in the mediator mass $M_\Psi$ and the small coupling $\epsilon$.

What would settle it

A lattice computation of the SU(3) $0^{-+}$ glueball mass that disagrees with $m_{\rm GALP}=6\Lambda$ by more than the stated uncertainty would rescale the mass axis of the predicted line; a measurement of a stable dark-matter pseudoscalar whose photon coupling lies far off Eq. (22) for every $M_\Psi$ would rule out the scenario.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a dark SU(3) Yang-Mills sector whose only visible interaction is a dimension-8 operator generated by a heavy fermion $\Psi$ produces a pseudoscalar glueball that is simultaneously a dark-matter candidate and an axion-like particle. The paper derives the glueball effective potential and identifies the pseudoscalar mass with the confinement scale, $m_{\rm GALP}\simeq 6\Lambda$ for $N=3$. Assuming GALPs constitute all of the dark matter, the relic-density estimate combined with the dark-to-visible temperature ratio $\zeta_T^{-1}\propto\sqrt{\epsilon}$ gives $$g_{\rm GALP\gamma}\simeq $10^{{-(21.1\pm 0.4)}}$\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}\,\kappa\,(m_{\rm GALP}/\mathrm{keV})^{5/3}(M_\Psi/\mathrm{GeV})^{-4},$$ with $\kappa\sim 1$ expected. The same effective theory generates GALP-nucleon couplings of order $g_{\rm GALP p}\sim -4.4\times10^{-22}\,\epsilon^2\kappa\,(\Lambda/100\,\mathrm{eV})^3(M_\Psi/\mathrm{GeV})^{-4}$. The paper maps the resulting parameter space against laboratory, stellar, supernova, and cosmological bounds and identifies a window around $180$ to $270$ MeV where a GALP is stable against decays and can be all of the dark matter.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction rests on the dark and visible sectors communicating only through the dimension-8 operator generated by one heavy fermion, and on that fermion having been in thermal equilibrium with photons; if any other portal exists or the annihilation history differs, Eq. (22) changes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If GALPs are all of the dark matter, their photon coupling is fixed by Eq. (22) once the GALP mass and mediator mass $M_\Psi$ are chosen, so photon-line, supernova, and beam-dump searches have a definite target curve.
  • Because the dark matter is produced by confinement rather than freeze-out, GALP masses can sit far above the usual unitarity bound, up to the mediator scale, opening a heavy-axion window that has been largely unexplored.
  • The same effective potential gives a scalar glueball partner with comparable couplings, so a signal with two glueball-like states would point to a two-component dark-matter sector rather than a single ALP.
  • The effective Peccei-Quinn scale $f_a$ can be super-Planckian while the underlying new physics sits at TeV-PeV scales, populating a parameter region ordinarily considered inaccessible and motivating searches there.
  • Nucleophilic GALPs have a narrow stability window near 180 to 270 MeV, part of which is already constrained by SN 1987A cooling and Kamiokande-II; sharper supernova observations would test the rest.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The $5/3$ slope in Eq. (22) is a fingerprint of the dimension-8 portal together with the temperature-ratio scaling; a dimension-6 portal would give different powers of $M_\Psi$ and a different line, so measuring the slope would identify the portal's operator dimension.
  • A dedicated calculation of $\Psi\bar{\Psi}$ annihilation into a dark-gluon pair could sharpen the normalization of $\zeta_T^{-1}$; the current relation assumes that channel is subleading by an $\epsilon^2$ factor.
  • The model does not address the strong-CP problem, so discovering GALPs would not validate composite-axion solutions; conversely, GALP dark matter and QCD-axion dark matter could coexist and be distinguished by their very different two-photon line energies.
  • The same glueball effective theory predicts a scalar partner with scalar and pseudoscalar photon couplings, so measuring the angular and polarization structure of a $\gamma\gamma$ line could tell GALP dark matter apart from a single axion-like particle.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper considers a dark SU(N) Yang-Mills sector that confines into a tower of glueballs and studies the lightest scalar (0++) and pseudoscalar (0-+) glueballs, calling the pseudoscalar a Glueball ALP (GALP). It constructs an effective potential for H and A from the trace anomaly (Eq. (7)), reviews the glueball relic-density estimate Eq. (9), introduces a dimension-8 portal to photons and QCD gluons through a heavy fermion Psi (Eqs. (11) and (16)), and derives effective photon and nucleon couplings (Eqs. (13) and (19)). Using published ALP constraints, it plots allowed regions in the mass-coupling plane (Figs. 1-3). The central new prediction is Eq. (22), a mass-coupling relation g_GALPgamma ~ 10^{-21.1} GeV^{-1} kappa (m_GALP/keV)^{5/3} (M_Psi/GeV)^{-4} obtained by imposing that GALPs account for all dark matter, with Lambda_0 = 133 eV and m_GALP = 6 Lambda.

Significance. If the construction holds, GALPs are a concrete composite realization of axion-like dark matter with a testable mass-coupling line, and the paper's careful mapping of existing photon, supernova, and beam-dump constraints to this line is useful. The paper gives credit to earlier scalar-glueball studies and clearly states that GALPs do not solve the strong-CP problem (Sec. VI). Its strengths are the trace-anomaly-constrained EFT setup, the explicit operator basis for the dimension-8 portal, and the falsifiable prediction Eq. (22). The main caveat is that the normalization and slope of Eq. (22) rely on an uncomputed thermal history, as detailed below.

major comments (3)
  1. [This concerns Section V, Eqs. (20)-(22).] The headline relation Eq. (22) is derived from the assumptions in Eqs. (20)-(21): Psi is in thermal equilibrium with the photon bath at T >> M_Psi, Psi Psi-bar -> gamma gamma dominates its annihilation, and the dark-gluon density is generated by Psi Psi-bar -> gamma g-tilde with an efficiency factor 1/2. No rate or Boltzmann calculation is provided for any of these premises. If Psi was never in equilibrium, or if Psi Psi-bar -> g-tilde g-tilde (or other channels) contributes significantly, the zeta_T^{-1} proportional to sqrt(epsilon) scaling in Eq. (21) and therefore the m^{5/3} slope and normalization of Eq. (22) change. Since Eq. (22) is presented in Sec. V and used in Fig. 3 as the model's mass-coupling relation, this step needs either a concrete rate computation or an explicit statement that Eq. (22) is an illustrative toy-model estimate; the Conclusions' description of the portal as a toy model is in tension with the central role Eq. (22) plays in the paper.
  2. [This concerns Section V, Eq. (9) and Eq. (22), and Figs. 1-3.] The identification m_GALP = 6 Lambda for the pseudoscalar glueball is used to convert the relic-density condition into Eq. (22), but the lattice and model references cited (Refs. [2,92]) primarily determine the lightest scalar 0++ glueball mass; no separate determination of the 0-+ mass ratio is presented. Because Eq. (9) describes the relic density of the lightest glueball and the pseudoscalar can decay through a -> eta eta (Eq. (A6)), the assumption that the pseudoscalar provides all of dark matter with m_GALP = 6 Lambda needs explicit justification.
  3. [This concerns Section IV.B, Eq. (11).] The paper assumes that the dimension-8 operator in Eq. (11) is the dominant dark-visible interaction without deriving the operator basis or showing that lower-dimensional operators (for example dimension-6 pure-gauge operators generated at one loop by a fermion charged under both dark SU(N) and electromagnetism) are absent or suppressed. If such operators exist, the (Lambda/M_Psi)^4 scaling of Eq. (13) and hence the whole Eq. (22) relation would not survive. At minimum this should be stated as a model assumption rather than presented as the portal.
minor comments (5)
  1. [This concerns the caption of Fig. 1 and Secs. IV.C and V.] The self-interaction lower bound on the GALP mass is inconsistent: the caption of Fig. 1 and the text of Sec. V use m_GALP >= 120 MeV, while Sec. IV.C quotes m_GALP >= 180 MeV and the stable window 180 MeV <= m_a <= 270 MeV; the figures and text should use one value.
  2. [This concerns Eq. (22).] The prefactor is written as 10^{-(21.1 +/- 0.4)} GeV, but the coupling g_GALPgamma has dimension GeV^{-1}; the prefactor should presumably read 10^{-(21.1 +/- 0.4)} GeV^{-1}.
  3. [This concerns Eq. (7) and Appendix A.] Equation (7) contains an arbitrary function f(A/H) and five uncomputed coefficients c0...c4; the appendix provides consistency conditions but no solution, so the EFT is not predictive beyond the O(1) parameter kappa unless kappa is explicitly treated as a free input.
  4. [This concerns the Introduction.] The phrase derive from the first principles overstates the status of Eq. (7), which is constrained by the trace anomaly but still contains arbitrary functions and uncomputed coefficients.
  5. [This concerns the Abstract and Sec. V.] The abstract's claim of viable GALP dark matter from sub-eV to the Planck scale is broader than what Fig. 3 supports for 100% dark matter, which requires m_GALP above roughly 120-180 MeV; sub-eV GALPs appear only in constraints that do not assume they are all of the dark matter.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the GALP mass-coupling relation follows from an explicit chain of EFT, relic-density, and thermal-history inputs; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

No load-bearing step reduces to its own input. The photon coupling in Eq. (13) is obtained from the dimension-8 portal of Eq. (11) together with the operator identifications of Eq. (2); this is an EFT input, not a restatement of the predicted mass-coupling relation. The relic-density formula Eq. (9) is imported from the authors' earlier independently published studies and is calibrated to the observed DM abundance, an external benchmark rather than a fitted proxy for the GALP-photon coupling. Section V then combines Eq. (13), Eq. (21), and the relic condition to eliminate epsilon and Lambda in favor of mGALP, giving Eq. (22); the 5/3 mass slope follows algebraically from zeta_T^{-1} proportional to sqrt(epsilon), not from assuming the target relation. The identification mGALP = 6 Lambda is a stated model/lattice input whose accuracy is a correctness risk, not a circular step. Self-citations to Refs. [1,2,26] for the relic density, Lambda0 = 133 eV, and Fig. 3 are normal extensions of prior work; they do not import a uniqueness theorem or forbid alternatives, and the central 'glueball as ALP' content is independently supported by the trace-anomaly EFT and operator analysis in Secs. II and IV. The thermal-equilibrium and branching assumptions in Sec. V are fragile but are explicit physical assumptions, not circular definitions.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The quantitative content of the paper is an EFT bookkeeping exercise layered on top of several inputs the reader does not get for free: the relic-density normalization (Lambda0 = 133 eV) from the authors' own earlier analyses, the lattice mass ratio m ~ 6 Lambda, the O(1) prefactor kappa, the unfixed potential coefficients c_i, and the assumption that a single heavy fermion generates exactly the dimension-8 portal and was once in thermal equilibrium with the photon bath. The GALP parameter space and the mass-coupling relation are functions of these inputs, so the ledger entries above are the honest price list for the central claims.

free parameters (5)
  • Lambda0, relic-density normalization scale = 133 eV (range 100-400 eV)
    Appears in Eq. (9), Omega h^2 = 0.12 zeta_T^{-3} Lambda/Lambda0, and fixes the absolute normalization of Eq. (22) via the dark-matter abundance condition. Taken from the authors' previous analysis [2]; not computed or cross-checked in this paper.
  • kappa, O(1) coupling prefactor = assumed ~ 1
    Defined in Eq. (14) from c_gamma, VEV ratios eta0/Lambda and a0/Lambda, and g/beta(g). The paper states 'we take kappa ~ 1, for simplicity'. Every coupling estimate (Eqs. 13, 18, 19, 22) scales linearly with kappa, so all derived bounds share this unquantified factor.
  • mGALP/Lambda = 6 mass ratio for the pseudoscalar = 6
    Used in all figures and in Eq. (22) to convert confinement scale to mass. The paper attributes it to lattice [92] without documenting that [92] targets the 0++ state; the 0-+ in SU(3) is typically heavier, which would shift the curves by an O(1) factor.
  • Potential coefficients c0...c4, eta0, a0, f(A/H) = unfixed (f set to zero)
    Eq. (7) leaves c_i and the VEVs free; Appendix A shows a 7-equation system that could fix them from m_eta, m_a, and Gamma_{a -> eta eta} but states the solution 'is neither unique nor guaranteed to exist' and exhibits none. The claims therefore do not depend on specific values, but neither are the masses computed from the dark gauge theory.
  • epsilon and Mpsi (dark coupling suppression and mediator mass) = scanned, epsilon <= 1e-2, Mpsi >= 1 TeV for viable 100% DM
    These are the free model parameters that define the violet model lines in Figs. 1-3 and the mass-coupling relation Eq. (22). They are scanned rather than fitted, but the entire GALP parameter space is a function of them, so the central claim cannot be stated without them.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The trace anomaly and dilatation-current non-conservation constrain the glueball potential to the form of Eq. (7), including the theta A H^3 and odd-A terms.
    Sec. II, Eqs. (4)-(7). This is standard QCD EFT lore (refs. [53,54]) applied to the dark sector. It fixes the functional structure but leaves the coefficients c_i and the arbitrary function f(A/H) undetermined.
  • domain assumption Below the confinement scale Lambda the spectrum is a two-field local EFT of scalar 0++ (H) and pseudoscalar 0-+ (A) glueballs; heavier glueballs and Polyakov-loop degrees of freedom decouple.
    Sec. II, Eq. (8). The truncation of the glueball tower at two states is assumed, mirroring the authors' previous scalar-only EFT.
  • domain assumption Integrating out the heavy fermion Psi generates only dimension-8 portals of the form G^2 F^2 with coefficient epsilon^2 alpha^2 / Mpsi^4, with no competing dimension-6 operator.
    Sec. IV.B, Eq. (11), attributed to ref. [4]. The absence of a dominant dimension-6 portal is asserted, not derived; no UV completion is presented.
  • domain assumption The relic density is given by Eq. (9), Omega h^2 = 0.12 zeta_T^{-3} Lambda/Lambda0 with Lambda0 = 133 eV, relying on a strongly first-order confinement transition that erases initial conditions.
    Sec. III, Eq. (9), from refs. [1,2] by the same authors. This is the anchor of the mass-coupling relation and is not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption The heavy fermion Psi was in thermal equilibrium with the photon bath at T >> Mpsi, so rho_gamma ~ 2 rho_Psi, yielding zeta_T^{-1} proportional to epsilon^{1/2} via Eq. (21).
    Sec. V, Eqs. (20)-(21). Determines the 5/3 power of Eq. (22); no check that the Psi-photon interaction rate exceeds the Hubble rate for the tiny epsilon values used.
  • domain assumption g/beta(g) ~ 1 at the confinement scale, so the matrix-element conversion of Eq. (2) introduces no large factor.
    Sec. IV.B, citing lattice ref. [62]. Converts operator VEVs into the photon couplings of Eq. (12); if wrong by an order of magnitude it shifts all coupling bounds.
invented entities (2)
  • Dark SU(N) sector with a pseudoscalar glueball ('GALP') as dark matter independent evidence
    purpose: Provides a composite, axion-like dark matter candidate with suppressed photon and nucleon couplings over a wide mass range
    The sector is falsifiable through the predicted (m, gGALPgamma) and (m, gGALPp) relations (Eqs. 13, 19, 22), which existing and future photon, supernova, and beam-dump searches can probe. No observation currently requires or excludes it.
  • Heavy portal fermion Psi, charged under dark SU(N) and electromagnetism/QCD
    purpose: Generates the dimension-8 dark-gluon to SM gauge-boson operators after being integrated out
    Its mass Mpsi and suppression epsilon are free parameters; the paper defers UV-complete models to future work, so Psi itself has no production, decay, or detection signature specified here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Glueball Axion-Like Particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LDVAT5YR

@misc{pith2026241111716,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Glueball Axion-Like Particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LDVAT5YR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11716}
}
read the original abstract

Dark Yang-Mills sectors that confine to form stable composite states, known as glueballs, have been traditionally proposed as a potential explanation for cosmological Dark Matter (DM). Earlier studies have established viability of the lightest scalar glueball as a possible DM candidate. In this work, we explore a whole class of effective composite sectors in the confined Yang-Mills regime featuring an additional pseudoscalar glueball state. We also investigate the role of effective interactions of the dark glueball sector with the visible sectors via higher-dimensional operators primarily focusing on dimension-8 couplings of glueballs to photons and gluons. We stress the remarkable similarities between the phenomenology of such glueball effective theories and Standard Model extensions featuring Axion-Like Particles (ALPs). Hence, one deals with a new class of composite Glueball ALPs (or GALPs) coupled to photons and/or nucleons in a wide mass range, from sub-eV to the Planck scale, yielding viable DM candidates that can be probed by astrophysical and cosmological observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11716 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The electromagnetic coupling-mass relation for GALPs considered to be pseudoscalar glueballs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Parameter space of GALPs (corresponding to a pseudoscalar glueball) expressed in terms of its mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The electromagnetic coupling-mass relation for GALP DM, considering [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    Huang, M

    W.-C. Huang, M. Reichert, F. Sannino and Z.-W. Wang, Testing the dark SU(N) Yang-Mills theory confined landscape: From the lattice to gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 035005 [ 2012.11614]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [1]

    Since GALP models inherently involve two different particles, with dif- ferent masses and couplings, the parameter space will refer to just one of the two GALPs – the lightest one

    Bounds and viable GALP models Given the similarity between GALPs and ALPs, it is convenient to summarize their properties in the mass- photon coupling plane, mGALP vs gGALP γ. Since GALP models inherently involve two different particles, with dif- ferent masses and couplings, the parameter space will refer to just one of the two GALPs – the lightest one. ...

  3. [2]

    In this model, it is natural to predict a very massive GALP, with masses well above the GeV scale

    Summary of photophilic GALPs As discussed above, GALPs coupled to photons are an interesting paradigm for ALP model building. In this model, it is natural to predict a very massive GALP, with masses well above the GeV scale. The coupling to pho- tons, in sharp contrast with canonical ALP models, can be extremely suppressed by introducing GALP-photon inter...

  4. [3]

    2 we summarize the constraints in the gGALP p- mGALP plane, and the parameter space allowed by GALP models

    Bounds and viable GALP models In Fig. 2 we summarize the constraints in the gGALP p- mGALP plane, and the parameter space allowed by GALP models. GALPs coupled to nuclear matter can be copi- ously produced inside Supernovae (SNe) and escape the star due to their weak interactions stealing energy from the core. When the energy lost in this form is compa- r...

  5. [4]

    Currently, there is a limited in- terest in heavy ALPs coupled to nucleons, and we hope this model can strengthen the case for such studies

    Summary of nucleophilic GALPs Nucleophilic GALPs are an interesting possibility to constitute a heavy ALP model that can be probed in astrophysical searches. Currently, there is a limited in- terest in heavy ALPs coupled to nucleons, and we hope this model can strengthen the case for such studies. Note that, in principle, GALPs coupled to QCD might decay ...

    2018

  6. [5]

    Carenza, R

    P. Carenza, R. Pasechnik, G. Salinas and Z.-W. Wang, Glueball Dark Matter Revisited , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 261302 [ 2207.13716]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [6]

    Carenza, T

    P. Carenza, T. Ferreira, R. Pasechnik and Z.-W. Wang, Glueball dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 123027 [2306.09510]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [7]

    E. D. Carlson, M. E. Machacek and L. J. Hall, Self-interacting dark matter , Astrophys. J. 398 (1992) 43

    1992

Show all 125 references
  1. [8]

    A. E. Faraggi and M. Pospelov, Selfinteracting dark matter from the hidden heterotic string sector , Astropart. Phys. 16 (2002) 451 [ hep-ph/0008223]

    2002 arXiv

  2. [9]

    J. L. Feng and Y. Shadmi, WIMPless Dark Matter from Non-Abelian Hidden Sectors with Anomaly-Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 095011 [ 1102.0282]

    2011 arXiv

  3. [10]

    K. K. Boddy, J. L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat and T. M. P. Tait, Self-Interacting Dark Matter from a Non-Abelian Hidden Sector, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 115017 [1402.3629]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Soni and Y

    A. Soni and Y. Zhang, Hidden SU(N) Glueball Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 115025 [ 1602.00714]

    2016 arXiv

  5. [12]

    G. D. Kribs and E. T. Neil, Review of strongly-coupled composite dark matter models and lattice simulations , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 (2016) 1643004 [ 1604.04627]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [13]

    B. S. Acharya, M. Fairbairn and E. Hardy, Glueball dark matter in non-standard cosmologies , JHEP 07 (2017) 100 [ 1704.01804]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [14]

    K. R. Dienes, F. Huang, S. Su and B. Thomas, Dynamical Dark Matter from Strongly-Coupled Dark Sectors, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 043526 [ 1610.04112]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Soni and Y

    A. Soni and Y. Zhang, Gravitational Waves From SU(N) Glueball Dark Matter , Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 379 [1610.06931]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [16]

    A. Soni, H. Xiao and Y. Zhang, Cosmic selection rule for the glueball dark matter relic density , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 083514 [ 1704.02347]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Draper, J

    P. Draper, J. Kozaczuk and J.-H. Yu, Theta in new QCD-like sectors, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 015028 [1803.00015]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Halverson, B

    J. Halverson, B. D. Nelson, F. Ruehle and G. Salinas, Dark Glueballs and their Ultralight Axions , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 043502 [ 1805.06011]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Forestell, D

    L. Forestell, D. E. Morrissey and K. Sigurdson, Cosmological Bounds on Non-Abelian Dark Forces , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 075029 [ 1710.06447]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Forestell, D

    L. Forestell, D. E. Morrissey and K. Sigurdson, Non-Abelian Dark Forces and the Relic Densities of Dark Glueballs , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 015032 [1605.08048]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [21]

    McKeen, R

    D. McKeen, R. Mizuta, D. E. Morrissey and M. Shamma, Dark Matter from Dark Glueball Dominance, 2406.18635

    arXiv

  15. [22]

    Biondini, H

    S. Biondini, H. Kolesova and S. Procacci, Smooth reheating and dark matter via non-Abelian gauge theory, Phys. Lett. B 857 (2024) 138995 [ 2406.10345]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [23]

    A. Das, B. Dasgupta and R. Khatri, Ballistic Dark Matter oscillates above ΛCDM, JCAP 04 (2019) 018 [1811.00028]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Panero, Thermodynamics of the QCD plasma and the large-N limit , Phys

    M. Panero, Thermodynamics of the QCD plasma and the large-N limit , Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 232001 [0907.3719]

    2009 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Halverson, C

    J. Halverson, C. Long, A. Maiti, B. Nelson and G. Salinas, Gravitational waves from dark Yang-Mills sectors, JHEP 05 (2021) 154 [ 2012.04071]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Reichert, F

    M. Reichert, F. Sannino, Z.-W. Wang and C. Zhang, Dark confinement and chiral phase transitions: gravitational waves vs matter representations , JHEP 01 (2022) 003 [ 2109.11552]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Z. Kang, J. Zhu and S. Matsuzaki, Dark confinement-deconfinement phase transition: a roadmap from Polyakov loop models to gravitational waves, JHEP 09 (2021) 060 [ 2101.03795]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Sannino, Polyakov loops versus hadronic states , Phys

    F. Sannino, Polyakov loops versus hadronic states , Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 034013 [ hep-ph/0204174]

    2002 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Carenza, R

    P. Carenza, R. Pasechnik and Z.-W. Wang, GALPs! Composite heavy axion-like Dark Matter , 2408.14245

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Rosenzweig, A

    C. Rosenzweig, A. Salomone and J. Schechter, A Pseudoscalar Glueball, the Axial Anomaly and the Mixing Problem for Pseudoscalar Mesons , Phys. Rev. D 24 (1981) 2545

    1981

  24. [32]

    W. I. Eshraim, S. Janowski, F. Giacosa and D. H. Rischke, Decay of the pseudoscalar glueball into scalar and pseudoscalar mesons , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 054036 [1208.6474]

    2013 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Cheng, H.-n

    H.-Y. Cheng, H.-n. Li and K.-F. Liu, Pseudoscalar glueball mass from eta - eta-prime - G mixing , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 014024 [ 0811.2577]

    2009 arXiv

  26. [34]

    G. Li, Q. Zhao and C.-H. Chang, Decays of J/ psi and psi-prime into vector and pseudoscalar meson and the pseudoscalar glueball-q anti-q mixing , J. Phys. G 35 (2008) 055002 [ hep-ph/0701020]. 13

    2008 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Masoni, C

    A. Masoni, C. Cicalo and G. L. Usai, The case of the pseudoscalar glueball, J. Phys. G 32 (2006) R293

    2006

  28. [36]

    Kochelev and D.-P

    N. Kochelev and D.-P. Min, X(1835) as the lowest mass pseudoscalar glueball and proton spin problem , Phys. Lett. B 633 (2006) 283 [ hep-ph/0508288]

    2006 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Gabadadze, Pseudoscalar glueball mass: QCD versus lattice gauge theory prediction , Phys

    G. Gabadadze, Pseudoscalar glueball mass: QCD versus lattice gauge theory prediction , Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 055003 [ hep-ph/9711380]

    1998 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Chowdhury, A

    A. Chowdhury, A. Harindranath and J. Maiti, Correlation and localization properties of topological charge density and the pseudoscalar glueball mass in SU(3) lattice Yang-Mills theory , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 074507 [ 1409.6459]

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Svrcek and E

    P. Svrcek and E. Witten, Axions In String Theory , JHEP 06 (2006) 051 [ hep-th/0605206]

    2006 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Cicoli, M

    M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell and A. Ringwald, The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology , JHEP 10 (2012) 146 [ 1206.0819]

    2012 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Halverson, C

    J. Halverson, C. Long, B. Nelson and G. Salinas, Axion reheating in the string landscape , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 086014 [ 1903.04495]

    2019 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127

    1983

  35. [43]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133

    1983

  36. [44]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137

    1983

  37. [45]

    H. D. Politzer, Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1346

    1973

  38. [46]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories - I , Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 3633

    1973

  39. [47]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, ASYMPTOTICALLY FREE GAUGE THEORIES. 2. , Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 980

    1974

  40. [48]

    Nambu, Strings, Monopoles and Gauge Fields , Phys

    Y. Nambu, Strings, Monopoles and Gauge Fields , Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 4262

    1974

  41. [49]

    A. M. Polyakov, Compact Gauge Fields and the Infrared Catastrophe, Phys. Lett. B 59 (1975) 82

    1975

  42. [50]

    ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 79 (1974) 276

    1974

  43. [51]

    Yamada and K

    M. Yamada and K. Yonekura, Cosmic strings from pure Yang–Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 123515 [2204.13123]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Yamada and K

    M. Yamada and K. Yonekura, Cosmic F- and D-strings from pure Yang–Mills theory , Phys. Lett. B 838 (2023) 137724 [ 2204.13125]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Bruno, N

    M. Bruno, N. Forzano, M. Panero and A. Smecca, Thermal evolution of dark matter in the early universe from a symplectic glueball model , 2410.17122

  46. [54]

    Reuter, Renormalization of the topological charge in Yang-Mills theory , Mod

    M. Reuter, Renormalization of the topological charge in Yang-Mills theory , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 12 (1997) 2777 [hep-th/9604124]

    1997 arXiv

  47. [55]

    M. A. Shifman and A. I. Vainshtein, On infrared renormalization of the topological charge , Nucl. Phys. B 365 (1991) 312

    1991

  48. [56]

    V. G. Knizhnik and A. Y. Morozov, RENORMALIZATION OF TOPOLOGICAL CHARGE, JETP Lett. 39 (1984) 240

    1984

  49. [57]

    Rosenzweig, J

    C. Rosenzweig, J. Schechter and C. G. Trahern, Is the Effective Lagrangian for QCD a Sigma Model? , Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 3388

    1980

  50. [58]

    Schechter, Effective Lagrangian with Two Color Singlet Gluon Fields , Phys

    J. Schechter, Effective Lagrangian with Two Color Singlet Gluon Fields , Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 3393

    1980

  51. [59]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to quantum field theory . Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995, 10.1201/9780429503559

    1995 doi

  52. [60]

    J. C. Collins, A. Duncan and S. D. Joglekar, Trace and Dilatation Anomalies in Gauge Theories , Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 438

    1977

  53. [61]

    Yamada and K

    M. Yamada and K. Yonekura, Dark baryon from pure Yang-Mills theory and its GW signature from cosmic strings, JHEP 09 (2023) 197 [ 2307.06586]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Halverson, B

    J. Halverson, B. D. Nelson and F. Ruehle, String Theory and the Dark Glueball Problem , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 043527 [ 1609.02151]

    2017 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Particle Data GroupCollaboration, R. L. Workman et al., Review of Particle Physics , PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01

    2022

  56. [64]

    Tarnopolsky, J

    G. Tarnopolsky, J. Eshelman, M. E. Law, J. Leong, H. Newman, R. Little, K. Strauch and R. Wilson, Hadron Production by electron-Positron Annihilation at 5-GeV Center-Of-Mass Energy , Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 432

    1974

  57. [65]

    Litke et al., Hadron Production by electron positron annihilation at 4-GeV center-of-mass energy , Phys

    A. Litke et al., Hadron Production by electron positron annihilation at 4-GeV center-of-mass energy , Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1189

    1973

  58. [66]

    Hasenfratz, C

    A. Hasenfratz, C. T. Peterson, J. van Sickle and O. Witzel, Λ parameter of the SU(3) Yang-Mills theory from the continuous β function, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 014502 [ 2303.00704]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Banks, M

    T. Banks, M. Dine, P. J. Fox and E. Gorbatov, On the possibility of large axion decay constants , JCAP 06 (2003) 001 [ hep-th/0303252]

    2003 arXiv

  60. [68]

    T. C. Bachlechner, C. Long and L. McAllister, Planckian Axions in String Theory , JHEP 12 (2015) 042 [1412.1093]

    2015 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Della Valle, A

    F. Della Valle, A. Ejlli, U. Gastaldi, G. Messineo, E. Milotti, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso and G. Zavattini, The PVLAS experiment: measuring vacuum magnetic birefringence and dichroism with a birefringent Fabry–Perot cavity, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 24 [1510.08052]

    2016 arXiv

  62. [70]

    M. J. Dolan, T. Ferber, C. Hearty, F. Kahlhoefer and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Revised constraints and Belle II sensitivity for visible and invisible axion-like particles , JHEP 12 (2017) 094 [ 1709.00009]. [Erratum: JHEP 03, 190 (2021)]

    2017 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Ablikim et al., Search for an axion-like particle in radiative J/ ψ decays, Phys

    BESIII Collaboration, M. Ablikim et al., Search for an axion-like particle in radiative J/ ψ decays, Phys. Lett. B 838 (2023) 137698 [ 2211.12699]

    2023

  64. [72]

    Aad et al., Measurement of light-by-light scattering and search for axion-like particles with 2.2 nb −1 of Pb+Pb data with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 03 (2021) 243 [ 2008.05355]

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., Measurement of light-by-light scattering and search for axion-like particles with 2.2 nb −1 of Pb+Pb data with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 03 (2021) 243 [ 2008.05355]. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 050 (2021)]

    2021 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Knapen, T

    S. Knapen, T. Lin, H. K. Lou and T. Melia, Searching for Axionlike Particles with Ultraperipheral Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 171801 [1607.06083]

    2017 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Bergsma et al., Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions, Phys

    CHARM Collaboration, F. Bergsma et al., Search for Axion Like Particle Production in 400-GeV Proton - Copper Interactions, Phys. Lett. B 157 (1985) 458

    1985

  67. [75]

    E. M. Riordan et al., A Search for Short Lived Axions in an Electron Beam Dump Experiment , Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 755

    1987

  68. [76]

    Blumlein et al., Limits on neutral light scalar and pseudoscalar particles in a proton beam dump experiment, Z

    J. Blumlein et al., Limits on neutral light scalar and pseudoscalar particles in a proton beam dump experiment, Z. Phys. C 51 (1991) 341. 14

    1991

  69. [77]

    Banerjee et al., Search for Axionlike and Scalar Particles with the NA64 Experiment, Phys

    NA64 Collaboration, D. Banerjee et al., Search for Axionlike and Scalar Particles with the NA64 Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 081801 [2005.02710]

    2020 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Cadamuro and J

    D. Cadamuro and J. Redondo, Cosmological bounds on pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons , JCAP 02 (2012) 032 [1110.2895]

    2012 arXiv

  71. [79]

    D. Grin, G. Covone, J.-P. Kneib, M. Kamionkowski, A. Blain and E. Jullo, A Telescope Search for Decaying Relic Axions, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 105018 [astro-ph/0611502]

    2007 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Todarello, M

    E. Todarello, M. Regis, J. Reynoso-Cordova, M. Taoso, D. Vaz, J. Brinchmann, M. Steinmetz and S. L. Zoutendijke, Robust bounds on ALP dark matter from dwarf spheroidal galaxies in the optical MUSE-Faint survey, JCAP 05 (2024) 043 [ 2307.07403]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Yin et al., First Result for Dark Matter Search by WINERED, 2402.07976

    W. Yin et al., First Result for Dark Matter Search by WINERED, 2402.07976

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Janish and E

    R. Janish and E. Pinetti, Hunting Dark Matter Lines in the Infrared Background with the James Webb Space Telescope, 2310.15395

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Carenza, G

    P. Carenza, G. Lucente and E. Vitagliano, Probing the blue axion with cosmic optical background anisotropies , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 083032 [ 2301.06560]

    2023 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Nakayama and W

    K. Nakayama and W. Yin, Anisotropic cosmic optical background bound for decaying dark matter in light of the LORRI anomaly , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 103505 [2205.01079]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Ayala, I

    A. Ayala, I. Dom ´ ınguez, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and O. Straniero, Revisiting the bound on axion-photon coupling from Globular Clusters , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 191302 [ 1406.6053]

    2014 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Caputo, H.-T

    A. Caputo, H.-T. Janka, G. Raffelt and E. Vitagliano, Low-Energy Supernovae Severely Constrain Radiative Particle Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 221103 [2201.09890]

    2022 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Diamond, D

    M. Diamond, D. F. G. Fiorillo, G. Marques-Tavares, I. Tamborra and E. Vitagliano, Multimessenger Constraints on Radiatively Decaying Axions from GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 101004 [2305.10327]

    2024 arXiv

  80. [88]

    P. F. Depta, M. Hufnagel and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Robust cosmological constraints on axion-like particles , JCAP 05 (2020) 009 [ 2002.08370]

    2020 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Langhoff, N

    K. Langhoff, N. J. Outmezguine and N. L. Rodd, Irreducible Axion Background, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 241101 [ 2209.06216]

    2022 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Blanco and D

    C. Blanco and D. Hooper, Constraints on Decaying Dark Matter from the Isotropic Gamma-Ray Background, JCAP 03 (2019) 019 [ 1811.05988]

    2019 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Munbodh and S

    P. Munbodh and S. Profumo, Astrophysical constraints from synchrotron emission on very massive decaying dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 043014 [2405.00798]

    2024 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Grilli di Cortona, E

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega and G. Villadoro, The QCD axion, precisely , JHEP 01 (2016) 034 [ 1511.02867]

    2016 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Lella, P

    A. Lella, P. Carenza, G. Co’, G. Lucente, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and T. Rauscher, Getting the most on supernova axions , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 023001 [2306.01048]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Carenza, G

    P. Carenza, G. Co, M. Giannotti, A. Lella, G. Lucente, A. Mirizzi and T. Rauscher, Cross section for supernova axion observation in neutrino water ˇCherenkov detectors, Phys. Rev. C 109 (2024) 015501 [2306.17055]

    2024 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Bhusal, N

    A. Bhusal, N. Houston and T. Li, Searching for Solar Axions Using Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 091601 [2004.02733]

    2021 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Curtin, C

    D. Curtin, C. Gemmell and C. B. Verhaaren, Simulating glueball production in Nf=0 QCD , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 075015 [ 2202.12899]

    2022 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Smirnov and J

    J. Smirnov and J. F. Beacom, TeV-Scale Thermal WIMPs: Unitarity and its Consequences , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 043029 [ 1904.11503]

    2019 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Griest and M

    K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski, Unitarity Limits on the Mass and Radius of Dark Matter Particles , Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) 615

    1990

  91. [99]

    Cirelli, G

    M. Cirelli, G. Corcella, A. Hektor, G. Hutsi, M. Kadastik, P. Panci, M. Raidal, F. Sala and A. Strumia, PPPC 4 DM ID: A Poor Particle Physicist Cookbook for Dark Matter Indirect Detection , JCAP 03 (2011) 051 [ 1012.4515]. [Erratum: JCAP 10, E01 (2012)]

    2011 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Cirelli, A

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan, Dark Matter , 2406.01705

    arXiv

  93. [101]

    Ghosh, P

    A. Ghosh, P. Konar and R. Roshan, Top-philic dark matter in a hybrid KSVZ axion framework , JHEP 12 (2022) 167 [ 2207.00487]

    2022 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Ghosh and P

    A. Ghosh and P. Konar, Precision prediction at the LHC of a democratic up-family philic KSVZ axion model, 2305.08662

    arXiv

  95. [103]

    Ghosh and P

    A. Ghosh and P. Konar, Unveiling desert region in inert doublet model assisted by Peccei-Quinn symmetry, JHEP 09 (2024) 104 [ 2407.01415]

    2024 arXiv

  96. [104]

    J. E. Kim, A COMPOSITE INVISIBLE AXION , Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 1733

    1985

  97. [105]

    Choi and J

    K. Choi and J. E. Kim, DYNAMICAL AXION, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 1828

    1985

  98. [106]

    Redi and R

    M. Redi and R. Sato, Composite Accidental Axions, JHEP 05 (2016) 104 [ 1602.05427]

    2016 arXiv

  99. [107]

    M. B. Gavela, M. Ibe, P. Quilez and T. T. Yanagida, Automatic Peccei–Quinn symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 542 [ 1812.08174]

    2019 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Pilaftsis, Diphoton Signatures from Heavy Axion Decays at the CERN Large Hadron Collider , Phys

    A. Pilaftsis, Diphoton Signatures from Heavy Axion Decays at the CERN Large Hadron Collider , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 015017 [ 1512.04931]

    2016 arXiv

  101. [109]

    K. J. Kelly, S. Kumar and Z. Liu, Heavy axion opportunities at the DUNE near detector , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 095002 [ 2011.05995]

    2021 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Lucente, P

    G. Lucente, P. Carenza, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti and A. Mirizzi, Heavy axion-like particles and core-collapse supernovae: constraints and impact on the explosion mechanism, JCAP 12 (2020) 008 [ 2008.04918]

    2020

  103. [111]

    Carenza, O

    P. Carenza, O. Straniero, B. D¨ obrich, M. Giannotti, G. Lucente and A. Mirizzi, Constraints on the coupling with photons of heavy axion-like-particles from Globular Clusters , Phys. Lett. B 809 (2020) 135709 [2004.08399]

    2020 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Lucente, O

    G. Lucente, O. Straniero, P. Carenza, M. Giannotti and A. Mirizzi, Constraining Heavy Axionlike Particles by Energy Deposition in Globular Cluster Stars , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 011101 [ 2203.01336]

    2022 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Diamond, D

    M. Diamond, D. F. G. Fiorillo, G. Marques-Tavares and E. Vitagliano, Axion-sourced fireballs from supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 103029 [2303.11395]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 108, 049902 15 (2023)]

    2023 arXiv

  106. [114]

    M¨ uller, P

    E. M¨ uller, P. Carenza, C. Eckner and A. Goobar, Constraining MeV-scale axionlike particles with Fermi-LAT observations of SN 2023ixf , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 023018 [ 2306.16397]

    2024 arXiv

  107. [115]

    P. S. B. Dev, J.-F. Fortin, S. P. Harris, K. Sinha and Y. Zhang, First Constraints on the Photon Coupling of Axionlike Particles from Multimessenger Studies of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 101003 [ 2305.01002]

    2024

  108. [116]

    M¨ uller, F

    E. M¨ uller, F. Calore, P. Carenza, C. Eckner and M. C. D. Marsh, Investigating the gamma-ray burst from decaying MeV-scale axion-like particles produced in supernova explosions , JCAP 07 (2023) 056 [2304.01060]

    2023 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Lella, P

    A. Lella, P. Carenza, G. Lucente, M. Giannotti and A. Mirizzi, Protoneutron stars as cosmic factories for massive axionlike particles , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 103017 [2211.13760]

    2023 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Calore, P

    F. Calore, P. Carenza, M. Giannotti, J. Jaeckel, G. Lucente and A. Mirizzi, Supernova bounds on axionlike particles coupled with nucleons and electrons , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 043016 [ 2107.02186]

    2021 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Caputo, P

    A. Caputo, P. Carenza, G. Lucente, E. Vitagliano, M. Giannotti, K. Kotake, T. Kuroda and A. Mirizzi, Axionlike Particles from Hypernovae , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 181102 [ 2104.05727]

    2021 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Ahmadvand, L

    M. Ahmadvand, L. Bian and S. Shakeri, Heavy QCD axion model in light of pulsar timing arrays , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 115020 [ 2307.12385]

    2023 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Giannotti, L

    M. Giannotti, L. D. Duffy and R. Nita, New constraints for heavy axion-like particles from supernovae, JCAP 01 (2011) 015 [ 1009.5714]

    2011 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Mori, Heavy axion-like particles and MeV decay photons from nearby type Ia supernovae , Publ

    K. Mori, Heavy axion-like particles and MeV decay photons from nearby type Ia supernovae , Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 73 (2021) 1382 [ 2107.09097]

    2021 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles , JHEP 12 (2017) 044 [1708.00443]

    2017 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Balkin, O

    R. Balkin, O. Hen, W. Li, H. Liu, T. Ma, Y. Soreq and M. Williams, Probing axion-like particles at the Electron-Ion Collider, JHEP 02 (2024) 123 [2310.08827]

    2024 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Mosala, P

    K. Mosala, P. Sharma, M. Kumar and A. Goyal, Axion-like particles at future e−p collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 44 [ 2307.00394]

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.