Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 53 references

Fractality-induced Topology

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fractal self-similarity alone can drive a lattice into a gapped topological phase with corner states, with no magnetic field, spin-orbit coupling, or staggered hopping.

desk verdict A genuinely new mechanism—fractality-induced topology via isospectral reduction—with a solid central example and some overgeneralized claims that a revision should tighten. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12341 v1 pith:EOYWVBR5 submitted 2024-11-19 cond-mat.mes-hall

L. Eek , Z. F. Osseweijer , C. Morais Smith This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords fractal-inducedtopologyhigher-ordertopologicalinsulatorisospectralreductionSierpińskigasketbreathingkagomelatticecornerstatesrotationalinvarianttight-bindingmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Fractality itself can act as the driving force for topological phases. The paper shows that a lattice built from Sierpiński-gasket unit cells, with only uniform nearest-neighbour hopping and no magnetic field, spin-orbit coupling, or staggered hopping, develops gapped phases that carry nontrivial rotational invariants and host exponentially localized corner states. The key step is isospectral reduction: removing the inner sites of a fractal unit cell leaves an effective breathing kagome lattice whose energy-dependent hoppings satisfy the usual breathing-kagome condition for higher-order topology. Because the reduction is spectral, the same argument carries over to Pascal-triangle fractals, N-flakes, the hexaflake, the Sierpiński tetrahedron, and triangulene, making fractal geometry a general source of topological corner states.

What carries the argument

The isospectral reduction (ISR), $R_S(H,E) = H_{SS} - H_{S\bar S}(H_{\bar S \bar S} - E I)^{-1}H_{\bar S S}$, converts the linear eigenvalue problem $H\psi = E\psi$ into a smaller nonlinear problem on a chosen subset $S$ without dropping spectral information. Applying it to a first-generation Sierpiński-kagome unit cell yields an effective breathing kagome lattice with intracell hopping $v(E) = E/[(E^2-1)(E-2)]$ and onsite potential $a(E) = 2(E^2-E-1)/[(E^2-1)(E-2)]$. The topological criterion of the static breathing kagome model, $|v| < w$, is then applied at the corner-state energy $E_c$ with $w = 1$, giving the condition $|v(E_c)| < 1$ for a topological corner state. This effective-breathing description is the object that carries the argument from fractal geometry to topology.

What would settle it

Look for the in-gap corner states in a finite Sierpiński-kagome flake with equal nearest-neighbour hoppings: the paper predicts sharp corner-localized peaks at energies $E_c$ satisfying $E_c = a(E_c)$ with $|v(E_c)| < 1$. If a flake with those parameters shows no such corner-localized in-gap states, or if the states vanish when the distance to a nearby hole falls below their localization length, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that self-similar fractal unit cells can induce topological corner states even when the underlying Hamiltonian contains nothing but a uniform nearest-neighbour hopping. For the Sierpiński-kagome lattice, $H = t \sum_{\langle ij\rangle} c_i^\dagger c_j$ with equal hoppings, the bulk spectrum develops multiple gaps, and the gapped phases are characterized by the rotational invariant $\chi^{(3)} = (1, 0)$, an obstructed atomic limit with a nonzero bulk dipole moment and fractional corner charge. Open-boundary calculations confirm corner-localized states sitting in those gaps. The isospectral reduction explains why: a first-generation Sierpiński unit cell reduces exactly to a breathing kagome model with intracell hopping $v(E)$ and onsite potential $a(E)$, so modes at energy $E$ feel a breathing lattice, and topological corner states emerge at energies $E_c$ solving $E_c = a(E_c)$ whenever $|v(E_c)| < 1$. The same logic, verified by explicit reductions, produces corner states in honeycomb Sierpiński, Pascal mod 3, hexaflake, Viczek, pentaflake, Sierpiński-tetrahedron, and triangulene lattices.

Load-bearing premise

The corner states remain genuine only if their exponential localization length is smaller than the distance from the corner to the nearest large hole of the fractal flake; if that fails, the corner state hybridizes with the hole and the topological interpretation is lost.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A uniformly coupled lattice with a fractal unit cell can act as a higher-order topological insulator, so engineering the geometry alone—no fields, no spin-orbit, no staggered hoppings—is enough to produce protected corner states.
  • The isospectral-reduction rule gives a practical design criterion: reduce the fractal unit cell, read off the effective intracell hopping $v(E)$ at the corner-state energy, and require $|v(E_c)| < 1$.
  • Corner states of lower fractal generations persist on higher-generation flakes as long as their localization length stays shorter than the distance to the nearest newly introduced hole.
  • Fractal families with rotation symmetries forbidden in periodic crystals, such as the fivefold pentaflake, extend higher-order topology beyond crystalline symmetry.
  • The three-dimensional Sierpiński-tetrahedron lattice reduces to an effective breathing pyrochlore model, implying the mechanism also produces topological corner states in three dimensions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is as generic as the explicit reductions suggest, natural fractal materials such as metal-organic frameworks and nanographene assemblies could already host corner-localized states without deliberate topological design; this is an experimentally testable consequence the paper does not itself test.
  • Because the effective Hamiltonian is energy-dependent, one fractal flake may host several topological gaps with corner states at different energies and different localization lengths, an implicit multi-band design resource the paper does not develop.
  • A quantitative robustness criterion follows directly from the paper's caveat: corner states on a fractal flake should disappear when the hole-to-corner distance is reduced below the localization length, which could be tested by deliberately drilling holes of varying sizes in an artificial fractal lattice.
  • The ISR route is not limited to tight-binding Hamiltonians, so the same reduction may expose topological corner states in photonic, acoustic, or mechanical fractal metamaterials where the equations of motion are linear and spectral.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that the self-similar geometry of fractal unit cells can by itself generate gapped topological phases with corner states in tight-binding models that contain only uniform nearest-neighbor hopping. The central example is the Sierpiński-kagome lattice, for which isospectral reduction maps each fractal unit cell onto an effective breathing kagome model with energy-dependent intra-cell hopping v(E) and onsite potential a(E). The authors derive corner-state energies from the condition E_c = a(E_c) with |v(E_c)| < 1, compute the rotational invariant χ^(3) = (1, 0) for the periodic bulk, and confirm exponentially localized corner states in open-boundary spectra. The framework is extended to honeycomb-Sierpiński, Pascal-triangle, hexaflake, Vicsek, pentaflake, Sierpiński-tetrahedron, and triangulene lattices, and the paper concludes that fractality itself can act as a general driving mechanism for higher-order topology.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper offers a conceptually new mechanism for higher-order topology: a purely geometric, fractal-induced mechanism with no staggering, magnetic field, or spin-orbit coupling, and a parameter-free analytic framework based on isospectral reduction. The Sierpiński-kagome case is well supported by three independent computations: the exact ISR parameters, the χ^(3) invariant evaluated on the periodic fractal-unit-cell lattice, and open-boundary corner states whose energies satisfy the condition E_c = a(E_c). The explicit corner wavefunction in Eq. (3) and the honest distinction in Table II between gap-closing and corner-mode criteria are particular strengths. However, the paper's breadth exceeds its derivations: the hexaflake, tetrahedron, Vicsek, and pentaflake claims rely on asserted reductions or finite-flake numerics, and the bulk-to-flake correspondence is heuristic. The paper would be a valuable contribution if the generality claims were supported at the same level of rigor as the Sierpiński-kagome case.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text, 'Fractals & other models'.] The transfer of the bulk χ^(3) characterization to the genuine fractal flakes of Fig. 2 rests on the statement that a corner state survives provided its localization length ℓ is smaller than the distance from the corner to a large hole. This condition is never quantified: ℓ = 1/|ln|v(E_c)|| is not computed for the states in Fig. S3 or Table II, and no comparison is made with the hole sizes of the generations shown in Fig. 2. Since the inner corner states of SM Sec. V decay only algebraically as 1/d and mix with flat bands, the possibility that outer corner states hybridize with hole-localized or inner-corner modes should be tested explicitly, for example by showing that corner-state energies and wavefunctions are stable under increasing the generation, filling the largest holes, or adding local disorder. Without such a check, the claim that fractality induces topologically protected states on fractal flakes, as opposed to fractal-like periodic lattices, remains a conjecture.
  2. [SM Sec. IV.C (Hexaflake), with SM Sec. IV.B and main text 'Generalizations'.] The claim that the hexaflake lattice reduces under ISR to a Kekulé lattice, with topology characterized by χ^(6), is the basis for the corner states shown in Fig. 2(d), but the effective parameters a(E) and v_i(E) are explicitly not given, as the SM states they are 'quite lengthy and therefore omitted'. The same is true for the asserted reductions of the Pascal triangle mod 3 (SM Sec. IV.B) and the Sierpiński tetrahedron (main text 'Generalizations'), for which no effective parameters or invariants are provided. These omissions are load-bearing because the paper's central thesis is the generality of the fractal-induced mechanism. I ask that the authors either include the explicit ISR expressions or provide the computed χ^(3) or χ^(6) invariants and a verification of the corner-mode condition for these lattices.
  3. [SM Sec. III.B, Table II.] The results for the second-generation Sierpiński-kagome lattice show that χ^(3) is correlated with the gap-closing criterion |v*_2| < |w| evaluated at E*, whereas the presence of corner states is correlated with |ṽ_2| < |w| evaluated at the corner-state energy Ẽ. Consequently, the gap at filling n = 11 hosts corner states despite χ^(3) = (0, 0), while the gap at n = 26 has χ^(3) = (1, 0) but no corner states. This shows that the bulk rotational invariant is not by itself a reliable predictor of corner states in these fractal lattices. The main-text statement that χ^(3) = (1, 0) 'indicat[es] that they are topological' should be qualified, and the paper should state plainly that the operative criterion for corner-state protection in this framework is the effective-model condition |v(Ẽ)| < 1 at the corner-state energy, rather than the conventional bulk-boundary correspondence.
minor comments (7)
  1. [SM Sec. I.] The displayed ISR formula, R_S(H,E)ψ_S = (H_SS + H_SS[H_S̄S̄−E]^{-1}H_S̄S)ψ_S, has a sign inconsistent with the derivation that precedes it; from ψ_S̄ = (E−H_S̄S̄)^{-1}H_S̄Sψ_S one obtains R_S = H_SS + H_SS(E−H_S̄S̄)^{-1}H_S̄S, which matches main-text Eq. (2) only after correcting the sign in the SM.
  2. [Main text, 'Fractals & other models' and 'Generalizations'.] The spelling 'Viczek' should be 'Vicsek' (the Vicsek fractal, named after T. Vicsek), in the text and in Fig. 3.
  3. [Main text, 'Generalizations'.] 'in a similary manner' is a typo for 'in a similar manner', and 'reigns of mathematical theory' should read 'realms of mathematical theory'.
  4. [Main text, 'Topological characterization'.] The sentence 'For the set of states highlighted by a blue circle in Fig. 1(b), we have χ(3) = (1, 0)' is ambiguous because Fig. 1(b) shows two blue circles; please specify that the statement refers to the right-hand circle whose states are plotted in Fig. 1(c).
  5. [Main text, 'Fractals & other models'.] 'These fractal unit cells can be used to construct flakes that are fractal-like, conform Fig 1(b)-(c)' — 'conform' should read 'cf.' or 'as in'.
  6. [Abstract and SM Sec. III.B.] The abstract's phrase 'topologically protected boundary and corner states' overstates the results, since the edge states identified in SM Sec. III.B are dipole-induced and acknowledged to be trivial; what is demonstrated is protected corner states, not protected edge states.
  7. [Throughout the text.] The rendering of Sierpiński is inconsistent ('Sierpi' nski', 'Sierpinski', 'Sierpinski-fractal'); please standardize the spelling and accents.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ISR is an exact reduction and the topological predictions are cross-checked by direct chi(3) invariants and open-boundary numerics.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) exact isospectral reduction maps the uniform-hopping fractal lattice to an energy-dependent breathing kagome model; (ii) the established breathing-kagome criterion |v|<|w| is applied at the self-consistent corner energy E_c = a(E_c); and (iii) the resulting predictions are corroborated by directly computed rotational invariants chi(3) and open-boundary wavefunctions. The ISR is an exact algebraic reduction, not a fit: v(E) and a(E) are derived in closed form from the original Hamiltonian and are not parameters tuned to the target corner states. The breathing-kagome criterion is an external, previously established result, and the paper explicitly checks the predicted gaps against the independent chi(3) calculation (e.g., Table II), so the prediction is not forced by construction. Self-citations appear as background or as references to the same ISR technique, but the load-bearing steps use the exact reduction plus external benchmarks and direct numerical/invariant checks. The heuristic localization-length argument for transferring bulk topology to finite fractal flakes is unquantified, which is a robustness concern rather than a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; the model contains only the hopping t, set to unity. The central derivation is parameter-free. The main assumptions are the standard ISR and rotational-invariant machinery, plus explicit domain assumptions about the bulk-boundary correspondence on finite flakes and the specific lattice constructions. The hexaflake ISR parameters are assumed to exist but not provided.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Isospectral reduction exactly preserves the spectrum of the original tight-binding Hamiltonian when reducing on a subset S.
    Used in Eq. (2) and throughout; the mapping R_S(H,E) = H_SS - H_SbarS(H_barbarSbarS - EI)^-1 H_barbarSS is from the Bunimovich-Webb book (Ref. 26), converting Hψ=Eψ to a nonlinear eigenvalue problem on S without losing spectral information.
  • standard math The rotational invariants χ^(n) of Benalcazar et al. correctly classify higher-order topology of the fractal-lattice Bloch Hamiltonian.
    Invoked in 'Topological characterization' and SM Section II, following Ref. 25; assumes the fractal-unit-cell lattice is periodic and C3 or C6 symmetric so that the Bloch Hamiltonian and its rotation eigenvalues are well-defined.
  • domain assumption The breathing kagome lattice with |v|<|w| hosts topological corner modes, and this condition carries over to the energy-dependent effective model evaluated at the corner-mode energy.
    The paper extends the static condition |v|<|w| to the energy-dependent v(E) at E_c. This transfer of a criterion from a static to an energy-dependent Hamiltonian is assumed, though it is corroborated by direct χ^(3) computation for the Sierpiński-kagome case.
  • domain assumption For fractal flakes, bulk-boundary correspondence holds when the corner-state localization length is smaller than the distance to the largest hole.
    Explicitly stated in the main text: 'the caveat here is that the localization length ℓ of a corner state should be smaller than the distance from the corner to a large hole.' This is a heuristic assumption because a fractal flake has no true bulk.
  • domain assumption The specific lattice constructions (site placements and nearest-neighbor connections) define the models, e.g., sites at centers of triangles for the Sierpiński-kagome lattice.
    SM Section VI specifies how lattices are built from fractals; the resulting tight-binding models depend on these choices, and other constructions would not necessarily show the same topology.
  • ad hoc to paper For the hexaflake, the effective Kekulé model parameters exist and are lengthy but omitted; for the tetrahedron, the reduction to breathing pyrochlore is asserted.
    SM Section IV C states the hexaflake expressions 'are quite lengthy and therefore omitted', and the tetrahedron reduction is described only verbally, so the validity of these reductions is taken as an assumption for those systems.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractality-induced Topology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EOYWVBR5

@misc{pith2026241112341,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractality-induced Topology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EOYWVBR5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12341}
}
read the original abstract

Fractal geometries, characterized by self-similar patterns and non-integer dimensions, provide an intriguing platform for exploring topological phases of matter. In this work, we introduce a theoretical framework that leverages isospectral reduction to effectively simplify complex fractal structures, revealing the presence of topologically protected boundary and corner states. Our approach demonstrates that fractals can support topological phases, even in the absence of traditional driving mechanisms such as magnetic fields or spin-orbit coupling. The isospectral reduction not only elucidates the underlying topological features but also makes this framework broadly applicable to a variety of fractal systems. Furthermore, our findings suggest that these topological phases may naturally occur in materials with fractal structures found in nature. This work opens new avenues for designing fractal-based topological materials, advancing both theoretical understanding and experimental exploration of topology in complex, self-similar geometries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12341 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) DOS for a kagome lattice system (i.e. without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Spatial distribution of corner state wave-functions on fractal lattices. The heat map denotes the summed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Spatial distribution of corner state wave-functions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [3]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  2. [2]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Effect with- out Landau Levels: Condensed-Matter Realization of the ”Parity Anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

  3. [1]

    K. V. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New Method for High-Accuracy Determination of the Fine-Structure Constant Based on Quantized Hall Resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980)

    work page 1980

  4. [4]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z 2 Topological Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  5. [5]

    D. Xiao, W. Yao, and Q. Niu, Valley-Contrasting Physics in Graphene: Magnetic Moment and Topological Trans- port, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236809 (2007)

    2007

  6. [6]

    N. Levy, S. A. Burke, K. L. Meaker, M. Panlasigui, A. Zettl, F. Guinea, A. H. C. Neto, and M. F. Crommie, Strain-Induced Pseudo–Magnetic Fields Greater Than 300 Tesla in Graphene Nanobubbles, Science 329, 544 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Topological insulators with inver- sion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 76, 045302 (2007)

    2007

  8. [8]

    Fang and L

    C. Fang and L. Fu, New classes of three-dimensional topological crystalline insulators: Nonsymmorphic and magnetic, Phys. Rev. B 91, 161105 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Slager, A

    R.-J. Slager, A. Mesaros, V. Juriˇ ci´ c, and J. Zaanen, The space group classification of topological band-insulators, Nature Phys 9, 98 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Van Miert and C

    G. Van Miert and C. Ortix, Higher-order topological in- sulators protected by inversion and rotoinversion symme- tries, Phys. Rev. B 98, 081110 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Electric multipole moments, topological multipole mo- ment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline in- sulators, Phys. Rev. B 96, 245115 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Schindler, M

    F. Schindler, M. Brzezi´ nska, W. A. Benalcazar, M. Iraola, A. Bouhon, S. S. Tsirkin, M. G. Vergniory, and T. Neupert, Fractional corner charges in spin-orbit cou- pled crystals, Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033074 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Schindler, A

    F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. P. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher- Order Topological Insulators, Sci. Adv. 4, eaat0346 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, 6 Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature 547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Canyellas, C

    R. Canyellas, C. Liu, R. Arouca, L. Eek, G. Wang, Y. Yin, D. Guan, Y. Li, S. Wang, H. Zheng, C. Liu, J. Jia, and C. Morais Smith, Topological edge and cor- ner states in bismuth fractal nanostructures, Nat. Phys. 20, 1421 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Conte, V

    M. Conte, V. Zampronio, M. R¨ ontgen, and C. M. Smith, The Fractal-Lattice Hubbard Model, Quantum 8, 1469 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    L. L. Lage and A. Latg´ e, Quasi-one-dimensional carbon-based fractal lattices, Front. Carbon 2, 10.3389/frcrb.2023.1305515 (2023), publisher: Frontiers

    2023

  10. [18]

    Manna, S

    S. Manna, S. K. Das, and B. Roy, Noncrystalline topo- logical superconductors (2022), arXiv:2207.02203 [cond- mat]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Manna, S

    S. Manna, S. Nandy, and B. Roy, Higher-order topologi- cal phases on fractal lattices, Phys. Rev. B 105, L201301 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Osseweijer, L

    Z. Osseweijer, L. Eek, A. Moustaj, M. Fremling, and C. M. Smith, Haldane model on the Sierpi \’nski gasket (2024), arXiv:2407.20075 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    J. Li, Y. Sun, Q. Mo, Z. Ruan, and Z. Yang, Fractality- induced topological phase squeezing and devil’s staircase, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 023189 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    S. N. Kempkes, M. R. Slot, S. E. Freeney, S. J. M. Zevenhuizen, D. Vanmaekelbergh, I. Swart, and C. M. Smith, Design and characterization of electrons in a frac- tal geometry, Nat. Phys. 15, 127 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    S. N. Kempkes, M. R. Slot, J. J. van den Broeke, P. Capiod, W. A. Benalcazar, D. Vanmaekelbergh, D. Bercioux, I. Swart, and C. Morais Smith, Robust zero- energy modes in an electronic higher-order topological insulator, Nat. Mater. 18, 1292 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    F. K. Kunst, G. van Miert, and E. J. Bergholtz, Lattice models with exactly solvable topological hinge and corner states, Phys. Rev. B 97, 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.241405 (2018)

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    W. A. Benalcazar, T. Li, and T. L. Hughes, Quantization of fractional corner charge in C n -symmetric higher- order topological crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. B 99, 245151 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    Bunimovich and B

    L. Bunimovich and B. Webb, Isospectral Transfor- mations: A New Approach to Analyzing Multidimen- sional Systems and Networks, Springer Monographs in Mathematics (Springer New York, New York, NY, 2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    C. V. Morfonios, M. R¨ ontgen, M. Pyzh, and P. Schmelcher, Flat bands by latent symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 104, 035105 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    R¨ ontgen, M

    M. R¨ ontgen, M. Pyzh, C. Morfonios, N. Palaiodimopoulos, F. Diakonos, and P. Schmelcher, Latent Symmetry Induced Degeneracies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 180601 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    R¨ ontgen, X

    M. R¨ ontgen, X. Chen, W. Gao, M. Pyzh, P. Schmelcher, V. Pagneux, V. Achilleos, and A. Coutant, Latent Su- Schrieffer-Heeger models (2023), arXiv:2310.07619 [cond- mat, physics:quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    L. Eek, A. Moustaj, M. R¨ ontgen, V. Pagneux, V. Achilleos, and C. M. Smith, Emergent non-Hermitian models, Phys. Rev. B 109, 045122 (2024)

    2024

  23. [32]

    Domany, S

    E. Domany, S. Alexander, D. Bensimon, and L. Kadanoff, Solutions to the Schr¨ odinger equation on some fractal lattices, Phys. Rev. B 28, 3110 (1983)

    1983

  24. [33]

    Biswas and A

    S. Biswas and A. Chakrabarti, Designer quantum states on a fractal substrate: Compact localization, flat bands and the edge modes, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 153, 115762 (2023)

    2023

  25. [34]

    We recognize that obtaining the full eigenstates requires a matrix inversion, which is a computationally costly operation. However, in the case of the kagome type lattices, HSS is a blockdiagonal matrix with the individual (identical) blocks being 3 n+1 × 3n+1 matrices (here n...

  26. [35]

    Meanwhile for a Pascal triangle mod k, one has to take k(k + 1)/2 copies of generation n to construct n + 1

    Another way to view this: The Sierp ´ ınski triangle is constructed by taking 3 identical copies of generation n to construct generation n + 1. Meanwhile for a Pascal triangle mod k, one has to take k(k + 1)/2 copies of generation n to construct n + 1

  27. [36]

    Freeney, J

    S. Freeney, J. van den Broeke, A. Harsveld van der Veen, I. Swart, and C. Morais Smith, Edge-Dependent Topology in Kekul´ e Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 236404 (2020)

    2020

  28. [37]

    A variation of the N -flake leaves out the central polygon

  29. [38]

    Ezawa, Higher-Order Topological Insulators and Semimetals on the Breathing Kagome and Pyrochlore Lattices, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Higher-Order Topological Insulators and Semimetals on the Breathing Kagome and Pyrochlore Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 026801 (2018)

    2018

  30. [39]

    E. H. Lieb, Two theorems on the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1201 (1989)

    1989

  31. [40]

    Kumar, K

    A. Kumar, K. Banerjee, A. S. Foster, and P. Liljeroth, Two-Dimensional Band Structure in Honeycomb Metal–Organic Frameworks, Nano Lett. 18, 5596 (2018)

    2018

  32. [41]

    Beugeling, E

    W. Beugeling, E. Kalesaki, C. Delerue, Y.-M. Niquet, D. Vanmaekelbergh, and C. M. Smith, Topological states in multi-orbital HgTe honeycomb lattices, Nat Commun 6, 6316 (2015)

    2015

  33. [42]

    Ortiz, G

    R. Ortiz, G. Catarina, and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Theory of triangulene two-dimensional crystals, 2D Mater. 10, 015015 (2023)

    2023

  34. [43]

    Catarina, J

    G. Catarina, J. C. G. Henriques, A. Molina-S´ anchez, A. T. Costa, and J. Fern´ andez-Rossier, Broken-symmetry magnetic phases in two-dimensional triangulene crystals, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 043226 (2023)

    2023

  35. [44]

    Turco, F

    E. Turco, F. Wu, G. Catarina, N. Krane, J. Ma, R. Fasel, X. Feng, and P. Ruffieux, Magnetic Excitations in Ferromagnetically Coupled Spin-1 Nanographenes, Angewandte Chemie , e202412353 (2024). Supplemental Material: Fractality-induced Topology L. Eek, 1 Z. F. Osseweijer, 1 an...

    2024

  36. [45]

    S7 but with v(E) =v, i.e

    Corner states in the (3, 122)-lattice We now focus on the topology of the (3 , 122)-lattice which is the lattice on the right-hand side of Fig. S7 but with v(E) =v, i.e. no energy-dependent v(E), see Fig. S8. In this case, the system is topological for |v|< 2/3 with corner sta...

  37. [46]

    For the effective energy-dependent parameters of reduced triangulene, this expression generalizes to E−a[n](E) =Ecorner[v[n](E)], (S32) where a[n](E) and v[n](E) are defined in Eqs

    Corner states in triangulene For the (3, 122)-lattice, the corner states sit at E = Ecorner. For the effective energy-dependent parameters of reduced triangulene, this expression generalizes to E−a[n](E) =Ecorner[v[n](E)], (S32) where a[n](E) and v[n](E) are defined in Eqs. (S...

  38. [47]

    W. A. Benalcazar, T. Li, and T. L. Hughes, Quantization of fractional corner charge in C n -symmetric higher-order topological crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. B 99, 245151 (2019)

    2019

  39. [48]

    M. A. J. Herrera, S. N. Kempkes, M. B. de Paz, A. G.-E. I. Swart, C. M. Smith, and D. Bercioux, Corner modes of the breathing kagome lattice: origin and robustness, Phys. Rev. B 105, 085411 (2022), arXiv:2201.07576 [cond-mat]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [49]

    One could view this as the value of v at the gap closing vgap and at the energy where the corner modes sit vcorner both being trivially equal to each other and to v

  41. [50]

    Freeney, J

    S. Freeney, J. van den Broeke, A. Harsveld van der Veen, I. Swart, and C. Morais Smith, Edge-Dependent Topology in Kekul´ e Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 236404 (2020)

    2020

  42. [51]

    L. Eek, M. R¨ ontgen, A. Moustaj, and C. M. Smith, Higher-order topology protected by latent crystalline symmetries (2024), arXiv:2405.02704 [cond-mat, physics:quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Zheng, X

    S. Zheng, X. Man, Z.-L. Kong, Z.-K. Lin, G. Duan, N. Chen, D. Yu, J.-H. Jiang, and B. Xia, Observation of fractal higher-order topological states in acoustic metamaterials, Science Bulletin 67, 2069 (2022)

    2022

  44. [53]

    J. Li, Q. Mo, J.-H. Jiang, and Z. Yang, Higher-order topological phase in an acoustic fractal lattice, Science Bulletin 67, 2040 (2022)

    2022

  45. [54]

    Conte, V

    M. Conte, V. Zampronio, M. R¨ ontgen, and C. M. Smith, The Fractal-Lattice Hubbard Model, Quantum 8, 1469 (2024). 19

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.