Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 133 references

Spin-density wave and superconductivity in La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$ under ambient pressure

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper predicts that hole-doped La4Ni3O10 at ambient pressure superconducts, with the same spin fluctuations that produce the stripe spin-density wave acting as the pairing glue.

desk verdict Plausible RPA account of the ambient-pressure stripe SDW in La4Ni3O10, with a testable doping route to superconductivity, but the charge channel is never checked and the SC prediction leans on one parameter set. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12349 v1 pith:A4HDDKXS submitted 2024-11-19 cond-mat.supr-con

Ming Zhang , Hongyi Sun , Yu-Bo Liu , Qihang Liu , Wei-Qiang Chen , Fan Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords nickelatesuperconductorsspindensitywavesuperconductivityrandomphaseapproximationHund'scouplingLa4Ni3O10Ruddlesden-PopperphasesFermisurfacenesting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a single electronic mechanism—spin fluctuations enhanced by Hund's rule coupling—explains both the density-wave order of ambient-pressure La4Ni3O10 and the possibility of superconductivity once hole-doped. Using a twelve-orbital tight-binding model fitted to density-functional-theory bands and a multi-orbital random-phase approximation, it predicts a stripe spin-density wave (SDW) at $Q\approx(\pm 0.7\pi,0)$ with antiphase outer NiO layers and a middle-layer node, matching the wave vector reported in neutron and X-ray experiments. The same framework finds no pairing in the undoped compound but a singlet pairing eigenvalue $\lambda\approx 0.45$ at a hole doping of $\delta=-0.4$, a value comparable to or larger than the high-pressure pairing strength. If the calculation is right, hole-doped La4Ni3O10 at ambient pressure is a genuine candidate superconductor, and the observed density wave has a purely electronic magnetic origin.

What carries the argument

The central object is the RPA-renormalized spin susceptibility $\chi^{(s)}(\mathbf{q}) = [I - \chi^{(0)}(\mathbf{q}) U^{(s)}]^{-1} \chi^{(0)}(\mathbf{q})$ evaluated in the twelve-orbital (six Ni sites times two orbitals) basis of the DFT-derived tight-binding model; its leading eigenvalue as a function of momentum locates the SDW wave vector, and the eigenvector gives the real-space moment pattern. The mechanism that selects $Q\approx(\pm 0.7\pi,0)$ is the nesting of the outer-layer $d_{z^2}$-dominated $\alpha_1$ and $\beta_1$ Fermi pockets, and the key control parameter is the Hund's coupling $J_H$, which must exceed about $0.16U$ to move the susceptibility maximum from $\Gamma$ to $Q$. Pairing is then assessed by solving the linearized gap equation on the Fermi surface; the eigenvalue $\lambda$ reports the pairing strength.

What would settle it

Resolve the magnetic structure of ambient-pressure La4Ni3O10 with neutron scattering: the paper predicts an incommensurate stripe SDW at $Q\approx(\pm 0.7\pi,0)$ that is antiphase between the outer NiO layers and has essentially zero moment on the middle layer. A measurement showing a different wave vector, same-phase outer layers, or a substantial middle-layer moment would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the leading RPA spin susceptibility of ambient-pressure La4Ni3O10 has its maximum at the incommensurate wave vector $Q\approx(\pm 0.7\pi,0)$, corresponding to a stripe SDW in which the two outer NiO layers are antiferromagnetically opposed and the middle layer carries almost no moment. This instability is traced to Fermi-surface nesting between the $\alpha_1$ and $\beta_1$ pockets, both dominated by the outer-layer Ni $d_{z^2}$ orbitals, and it appears only when the Hund's coupling exceeds $J_H\approx 0.16U$; below that threshold the leading instability is a Neel-type order at $\Gamma$, similar to the high-pressure state. For the undoped system the calculated pairing eigenvalue is negligible, but at hole doping $\delta=-0.4$ a singlet channel reaches $\lambda\approx 0.45$, with the gap concentrated on the outer-layer $d_{z^2}$ pocket that also drives the SDW nesting.

Load-bearing premise

The central prediction assumes the experimentally observed density wave is a purely electronic spin instability of the itinerant RPA model; if charge order or lattice distortions substantially drive or modify the transition, the predicted Q vector and the $J_H>0.16U$ condition would not describe the actual material.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Hole doping of about 0.4 electrons per cell removed should make ambient-pressure La4Ni3O10 superconducting, with a pairing eigenvalue $\lambda\approx 0.45$ that exceeds the high-pressure value of 0.25.
  • The experimentally observed density wave below 135 K is compatible with a spin-only, itinerant mechanism; charge order and lattice distortions need not set the wave vector.
  • The predicted SDW pattern—antiphase outer layers with a middle-layer node—distinguishes ambient-pressure La4Ni3O10 from its high-pressure Neel-type order and is directly checkable by layer-resolved magnetic probes.
  • Since the same outer-layer $d_{z^2}$ pockets drive both SDW nesting and pairing, doping and pressure act as competing knobs: pressure favors Neel order, while hole doping at ambient pressure should favor stripe order plus superconductivity.
  • The threshold $J_H>0.16U$ gives a concrete, falsifiable condition for the stripe order to exist, linking the density-wave physics to the size of Hund's coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If correct, the sharp threshold at $J_H\approx 0.16U$ suggests that chemically tuning Hund's coupling—for example, by rare-earth substitution or oxygen stoichiometry in the Ruddlesden-Popper series—should move nickelates between stripe and Neel-type instabilities, a prediction the paper does not make explicitly.
  • The mechanism implies that the pairing is mediated by the same spin fluctuations that produce the SDW, so the highest $T_c$ should occur where the stripe susceptibility is strongest but still below the ordering instability; a doping scan across $\delta=-0.4$ could reveal such a dome.
  • The absence of superconductivity in the undoped ambient-pressure compound is attributed to weak nesting at $(0,0)$; if future experiments find undoped superconductivity, the RPA picture would need a different pairing glue or a revised band structure.
  • The calculation treats the middle layer as a passive node; an alternative localized-moment picture might predict a small but nonzero middle-layer moment, so resolving that moment experimentally would discriminate between the itinerant and local-moment descriptions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a twelve-orbital tight-binding model for ambient-pressure La4Ni3O10 from DFT calculations and studies magnetic and pairing instabilities with multi-orbital random-phase approximation (RPA). The leading RPA spin susceptibility is found at Q≈(±0.7π,0), close to the experimental wave vector (±0.76π,0), with a stripe-like real-space pattern in which the two outer NiO layers are antiphase and the middle layer carries almost no moment. Parameter scans identify a threshold JH>0.16U for this stripe order, separating it from the Γ-point (Neel-type) fluctuation regime. For hole doping δ=-0.4, the authors obtain a singlet pairing eigenvalue λ≈0.45 and predict that ambient-pressure superconductivity should be achievable, with a gap mostly on the outer-layer dz2 pocket.

Significance. If the central SDW claim holds, the paper gives a concrete microscopic mechanism for the ambient-pressure density wave in La4Ni3O10: nesting between outer-layer dz2 pockets is selected by Hund's coupling, and the wave vector emerges from the DFT-derived band structure without experimental fitting constants. The controlled scans that vary JH and V separately are a genuine strength and make the threshold condition JH>0.16U falsifiable. The doping prediction at δ=-0.4 is also a clear, testable consequence. Two caveats limit the significance as written: the experimental density wave is an intertwined SDW+CDW, and the charge susceptibility defined in Eq. (3) is never evaluated; and the superconducting prediction rests on one doping point and one parameter set, so it is more fragile than the SDW result.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Eq. (3)] The charge susceptibility χ(c) is defined in Eq. (3) but is never evaluated or reported anywhere in the paper. This omission is load-bearing because the experimental anchor, Ref. [107], reports an intertwined SDW and CDW on the Ni sublattice, whereas the paper's central claim is that the stripe wave vector Q≈(±0.7π,0) is a spin instability driven by JH. At the working point JH=0.25U, the relation U=V+2JH gives an interorbital repulsion V=0.5U, which can in principle feed a near-critical charge channel. Please compute the largest eigenvalue of χ(c)(q) at Q and at Γ, or otherwise show from the RPA denominator that the charge channel is subcritical. Without this, the identification of Q as a purely spin nesting vector, and the conclusion that JH is the primary driver of the observed density wave, are not established against the intertwined SDW+CDW seen in experiment.
  2. [Section V, Fig. 7(a)] The superconductivity prediction rests on a single doping point (δ=-0.4) and a single parameter set (U=1 eV, JH=U/6) taken from the authors' high-pressure study, Ref. [132]. The maximum λ≈0.45 should be tested for robustness: for example, vary U and JH around the chosen values and confirm that the peak at δ=-0.4 does not depend on the particular pairing kernel in Eq. (4). In addition, the comparison λ(δ=-0.4)=0.45 with the high-pressure value λ=0.25 is only meaningful if the same U, JH, and pairing kernel are used and if the high-pressure value refers to a comparable state; the text should state this explicitly rather than leaving it implicit.
  3. [Figure 2 and Section III] The quantitative agreement with experiment is based on comparing the calculated Q≈(±0.7π,0) with the experimental (±0.76π,0). The manuscript should report the width of the RPA spin-susceptibility peak near Q, since a shift of 0.06π is only meaningful if it is small compared with the peak width. This is needed to support the statement that the wave vector 'emerges' from the model rather than being tuned to the experimental value.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Section III] The term 'non-commensurate' should be replaced with 'incommensurate' or another precise descriptor; the current wording is nonstandard.
  2. [Section II] There are several typographical issues: 'PA W' should be 'PAW', 'V ASP' should be 'VASP', and 'P 21/a' should be typeset consistently as P21/a.
  3. [Figure 5 caption] The statement 'U ≈ Uc ensures the system is near the critical interaction strength' is vague; the caption should specify the value of U used for each panel and how the corresponding Uc is determined.
  4. [Section V, Eq. (4)] The notation vβF(q) and the integration measure dq∥ are not defined in the text, and the thin-shell approximation used to arrive at Eq. (4) is only mentioned in passing; a brief definition would improve reproducibility.
  5. [Section VI] In the conclusion, 'JH > 0.16' should read 'JH > 0.16U' for consistency with the rest of the paper.
  6. [Section V] The doping variable δ is used with the convention δ = n - 8, but this is not stated explicitly; please define it in the text so that 'hole doping δ=-0.4' is unambiguous.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SDW wave vector and SC eigenvalue emerge from a DFT-derived tight-binding model plus RPA, with parameter choices and high-pressure benchmarks that are not fitted to the target claims.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The twelve-orbital tight-binding model is fitted to DFT band structure (Sec. II), not to the experimental Q; the RPA spin susceptibility in Eq. (3) is evaluated over the Brillouin zone and yields the leading peak at Q≈(±0.7π,0), which is then compared with the external experimental value (±0.76π,0) from Ref. [107] without adjusting constants. The JH>0.16U threshold is obtained by direct parameter sweeps in Fig. 5, separating V and JH dependence, so it is a computed phase boundary rather than an input. The doping dependence of the pairing eigenvalue λ(δ) in Fig. 7(a) is computed for δ in (-0.7,0.7), and the maximum at δ=-0.4 is read off the calculation; the high-pressure comparison λ=0.25 is part of the same calculation family in Fig. 6(d), and the parameter choice U=1 eV, JH=U/6 cites the authors' Ref. [132] but is not used to force the ambient result. The only caveats are scientific rather than circular: the charge susceptibility χ(c) defined in Eq. (3) is not reported even though the experimental anchor Ref. [107] describes an intertwined SDW+CDW, so the claim that the order is purely spin-driven may be incomplete. That omission affects robustness, not logical circularity. No step in the paper reduces a prediction to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on a DFT+U-derived tight-binding model, a Hubbard-Kanamori interaction with parameters U, V, JH, the RPA approximation for susceptibilities, and the linearized gap equation. The interaction parameters U, JH/U, and the doping δ are chosen by hand or scanned, with δ=-0.4 selected to maximize λ. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • RPA Hubbard U = U=1.3 eV for SDW; U=1 eV for SC
    Interaction strength is an input, not derived. The SDW calculation uses U=1.3 eV just below the calculated critical Uc≈1.33 eV, while the SC calculation uses U=1 eV following Ref. [132].
  • Hund's coupling ratio JH/U = threshold 0.16; scanned 0.1-0.3
    The key control parameter. The stripe SDW appears for JH>0.16U; this threshold is extracted from RPA scans, not from experiment or first principles.
  • Hole doping δ = -0.4
    Chosen because the pairing eigenvalue λ peaks at this doping in the RPA calculation. It is an optimized model parameter rather than a measured doping level.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The 12-orbital tight-binding model from DFT+U (U=3.5 eV) with the P21/a ambient-pressure structure captures the low-energy Fermi surface and orbital character of La4Ni3O10.
    Invoked in Section II; the RPA results depend on the α1/β1 nesting and the outer-layer dz2 orbital weight. If the Wannier model is inaccurate, the predicted Q vector and pairing channel fail.
  • domain assumption The multi-orbital RPA susceptibility (Eq. 3) reliably identifies the leading magnetic instability, and the linearized gap equation (Eq. 4) gives the leading pairing channel.
    RPA is an approximate weak-to-intermediate coupling method that tends to overestimate magnetic tendencies. The paper uses it without benchmarking against exact numerics.
  • domain assumption The Kanamori relation U=V+2JH and the chosen interaction parameters describe the correlated electron system.
    Used in Eq. (2); the interaction parameters are inputs, and the relation is standard but not derived for this specific material.
  • domain assumption The experimentally observed density wave is dominated by spin correlations, so charge order and lattice effects can be neglected when computing the SDW vector.
    Section III; experiment [107] reports intertwined SDW and CDW, and the paper does not model charge order or lattice distortions.
  • standard math Standard matrix inversion, eigenvalue, and BCS-type λ-Tc relations are valid background mathematics.
    Used implicitly in the RPA resummation and in the relation λ^-1 = ln(1.13ħω_D/k_BT_c); not proved in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin-density wave and superconductivity in La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$ under ambient pressure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A4HDDKXS

@misc{pith2026241112349,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin-density wave and superconductivity in La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_10$ under ambient pressure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A4HDDKXS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12349}
}
abstract

We investigate the spin-density wave (SDW) behavior and the potential for superconductivity (SC) in La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_{10}$ under ambient pressure using a multi-orbital random-phase approximation (RPA). Starting with a twelve-orbital tight-binding model derived from density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we explore the influence of Hubbard interactions on SDW formation. Our analysis reveals a stripe-like SDW characterized by an incommensurate wave vector, $Q\approx(\pm 0.7\pi,0)$, suggesting a possible density wave instability in agreement with recent experiments. This configuration is driven by nesting of outer-layer Ni $d_{z^2}$ orbitals and exhibits interlayer antiferromagnetic ordering between the top and bottom NiO layers, with the middle layer serving as a node. We demonstrate that the Hund's coupling $J_H$ is the primary driver of the observed SDW. While superconductivity is absent in the undoped system under ambient pressure, it becomes attainable with appropriate hole doping ($\delta=-0.4$), resulting in a SC gap structure similar to the high-pressure phase. Our study identifies the specific conditions for realizing the ambient pressure stripe density wave: $J_H>0.16U$. Additionally, when doping leads to sufficient nesting at (0,0), the system's magnetic fluctuations transition into a stable Neel-type antiferromagnetic state, analogous to the high-pressure case.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.12349 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (color online) Band structure of the DFT and twelve [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (color online) (a) The distribution of the RPA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (color online) (a) The leading spin-fluctuation pattern within an unit cell, where the red (blue) pattern represents the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (color online) (a) Dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (color online) Comparison between ambient and high [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (color online) Doping effects at ambient pressure. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

133 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [107]

    Zhang, D

    J. Zhang, D. Phelan, A. Botana, Y.-S. Chen, H. Zheng, M. Krogstad, S. G. Wang, Y. Qiu, J. Rodriguez-Rivera, R. Osborn, et al., Intertwined density waves in a metal- lic nickelate, Nat. Commun. 11, 6003 (2020)

    2020

  2. [132]

    Zhang, H

    M. Zhang, H. Sun, Y.-B. Liu, Q. Liu, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang, The s±-wave superconductivity in the pressur- ized La4Ni3O10, Phys. Rev. B 110, L180501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconductivity near 80k in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature621, 493 (2023)

    2023

  4. [2]

    Zhang, D

    Y. Zhang, D. Su, Y. Huang, Z. Shan, H. Sun, M. Huo, K. Ye, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y. Xu, Y. Su, R. Li, M. Smidman, M. Wang, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, High- temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La3Ni2O7−δ, Nat. Phys. 20, 1269 (2024)

    2024

  5. [3]

    Hou, P.-T

    J. Hou, P.-T. Yang, Z.-Y. Liu, J.-Y. Li, P.-F. Shan, L. Ma, G. Wang, N.-N. Wang, H.-Z. Guo, J.-P. Sun, Y. Uwatoko, M. Wang, G.-M. Zhang, B.-S. Wang, and J.-G. Cheng, Emergence of high-temperature supercon- ducting phase in pressurized La 3Ni2O7 crystals, Chin. Phys. Lett. 40, 117302 (2023)

    2023

  6. [4]

    G. Wang, N. N. Wang, X. L. Shen, J. Hou, L. Ma, L. F. Shi, Z. A. Ren, Y. D. Gu, H. M. Ma, P. T. Yang, Z. Y. Liu, H. Z. Guo, J. P. Sun, G. M. Zhang, S. Calder, J.-Q. Yan, B. S. Wang, Y. Uwatoko, and J.-G. Cheng, Pressure-induced superconductivity in polycrys- talline La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011040 (2024)

    2024

  7. [5]

    G. Wang, N. Wang, Y. Wang, L. Shi, X. Shen, J. Hou, H. Ma, P. Yang, Z. Liu, H. Zhang, X. Dong, J. Sun, B. Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, Y. Uwatoko, and J. Cheng, Observation of high-temperature superconductivity in the high-pressure tetragonal phase of La 2PrNi2O7−δ, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08212 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  8. [6]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Pei, Q. Wang, Y. Zhao, C. Li, W. Cao, S. Zhu, J. Wu, and Y. Qi, Effects of pressure and dop- ing on ruddlesden-popper phases La n+1NinO3n+1, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 185, 147 (2024)

    2024

Show all 133 references
  1. [7]

    Y. Zhu, D. Peng, E. Zhang, B. Pan, X. Chen, L. Chen, H. Ren, F. Liu, Y. Hao, N. Li, et al., Superconductiv- ity in pressurized trilayer La 4Ni3O10−δ single crystals, Nature 631, 531 (2024)

    2024

  2. [8]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Pei, X. Du, Y. Cao, Q. Wang, J. Wu, Y. Li, Y. Zhao, C. Li, W. Cao, et al., Superconductivity in trilayer nickelate La 4Ni3O10 under pressure, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07423 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Huang, H

    X. Huang, H. Zhang, J. Li, M. Huo, J. Chen, Z. Qiu, P. Ma, C. Huang, H. Sun, and M. Wang, Signature of superconductivity in pressurized trilayer-nickelate Pr4Ni3O10−δ, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07861 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Li, Y.-J

    Q. Li, Y.-J. Zhang, Z.-N. Xiang, Y. Zhang, X. Zhu, and H.-H. Wen, Signature of superconductivity in pressur- ized La4Ni3O10, Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 017401 (2024)

    2024

  5. [11]

    Y. Zhou, J. Guo, S. Cai, H. Sun, P. Wang, J. Zhao, J. Han, X. Chen, Q. Wu, Y. Ding, M. Wang, T. Xi- ang, H. kwang Mao, and L. Sun, Investigations of key issues on the reproducibility of high-Tc superconductiv- ity emerging from compressed La3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12...

    2023 arXiv

  6. [12]

    D. Li, K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Osada, S. Crossley, H. R. Lee, Y. Cui, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Supercon- ductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate, Nature 572, 624 (2019)

    2019

  7. [13]

    K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Osada, B. H. Goodge, T. C. Wang, Y. Lee, S. Harvey, W. J. Kim, Y. Yu, C. Murthy, et al., Linear-in-temperature resistivity for optimally su- perconducting (Nd, Sr) NiO 2, Nature 619, 288 (2023)

    2023

  8. [14]

    Nomura and R

    Y. Nomura and R. Arita, Superconductivity in infinite- layer nickelates, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 052501 (2022)

    2022

  9. [15]

    Gu and H.-H

    Q. Gu and H.-H. Wen, Superconductivity in nickel- based 112 systems, The Innovation 3 (2022)

    2022

  10. [16]

    J. Yang, H. Sun, X. Hu, Y. Xie, T. Miao, H. Luo, H. Chen, B. Liang, W. Zhu, G. Qu, et al., Orbital- dependent electron correlation in double-layer nickelate La3Ni2O7, Nat. Commun. 15, 4373 (2024)

    2024

  11. [17]

    L. Wang, Y. Li, S. Xie, F. Liu, H. Sun, C. Huang, Y. Gao, T. Nakagawa, B. Fu, B. Dong, Z. Cao, R. Yu, S. I. Kawaguchi, H. Kadobayashi, M. Wang, C. Jin, H. kwang Mao, and H. Liu, Structure responsible for the superconducting state in La 3Ni2O7 at low tem- perature and high pres...

    2023 arXiv

  12. [18]

    T. Cui, S. Choi, T. Lin, C. Liu, G. Wang, N. Wang, S. Chen, H. Hong, D. Rong, Q. Wang, Q. Jin, J.-O. Wang, L. Gu, C. Ge, C. Wang, J. G. Cheng, Q. Zhang, L. Si, K. juan Jin, and E.-J. Guo, Strain mediated phase crossover in Ruddlesden Popper nickelates, arXiv preprint arXiv:231...

    2023 arXiv

  13. [19]

    X. Sui, X. Han, X. Chen, L. Qiao, X. Shao, and B. Huang, Electronic properties of nickelate supercon- ductor R3Ni2O7 with oxygen vacancies, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.01271 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  14. [20]

    X. Chen, J. Choi, Z. Jiang, J. Mei, K. Jiang, J. Li, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia-Fernandez, X. Huang, H. Sun, D. Shen, M. Wang, J. Hu, Y. Lu, K.-J. Zhou, and D. Feng, Electronic and magnetic excitations in La3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12657 (2024). 8

    2024 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. W´ u, and D.-X. Yao, Bi- layer two-orbital model of La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  16. [22]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Elec- tronic structure, dimer physics, orbital-selective behav- ior, and magnetic tendencies in the bilayer nickelate su- perconductor La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 108, L180510 (2023)

    2023

  17. [23]

    Q.-G. Yang, D. Wang, and Q.-H. Wang, Possible S±- wave superconductivity in La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B 108, L140505 (2023)

    2023

  18. [24]

    Lechermann, J

    F. Lechermann, J. Gondolf, S. B¨ otzel, and I. M. Eremin, Electronic correlations and superconducting instability in La 3Ni2O7 under high pressure, Phys. Rev. B 108, L201121 (2023)

    2023

  19. [25]

    Sakakibara, N

    H. Sakakibara, N. Kitamine, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Possible high Tc superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 under high pressure through manifestation of a nearly half- filled bilayer hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 106002 (2024)

    2024

  20. [26]

    Y. Gu, C. Le, Z. Yang, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Effective model and pairing tendency in bilayer Ni-based super- conductor La 3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.07275 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Y. Shen, M. Qin, and G.-M. Zhang, Effective bi- layer model hamiltonian and density-matrix renormal- ization group study for the high- Tc superconductivity La3Ni2O7 under high pressure, Chin. Phys. Lett. 40, 127401 (2023)

    2023

  22. [28]

    Christiansson, F

    V. Christiansson, F. Petocchi, and P. Werner, Corre- lated electronic structure of La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 206501 (2023)

    2023

  23. [29]

    D. A. Shilenko and I. V. Leonov, Correlated elec- tronic structure, orbital-selective behavior, and mag- netic correlations in double-layer La 3Ni2O7 under pres- sure, Phys. Rev. B 108, 125105 (2023)

    2023

  24. [30]

    W. W´ u, Z. Luo, D.-X. Yao, and M. Wang, Superex- change and charge transfer in the nickelate superconduc- tor La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 117402 (2024)

    2024

  25. [31]

    Cao and Y.-f

    Y. Cao and Y.-f. Yang, Flat bands promoted by hund’s rule coupling in the candidate double-layer high- temperature superconductor La3Ni2O7 under high pres- sure, Phys. Rev. B 109, L081105 (2024)

    2024

  26. [32]

    X. Chen, P. Jiang, J. Li, Z. Zhong, and Y. Lu, Crit- ical charge and spin instabilities in superconducting La3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.07154 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Liu, J.-W

    Y.-B. Liu, J.-W. Mei, F. Ye, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang, s±-wave pairing and the destructive role of apical- oxygen deficiencies in La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 236002 (2023)

    2023

  28. [34]

    C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Interlayer-coupling- driven high-temperature superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 146002 (2024)

    2024

  29. [35]

    Oh and Y.-H

    H. Oh and Y.-H. Zhang, Type-II t-J model and shared superexchange coupling from hund’s rule in supercon- ducting La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B 108, 174511 (2023)

    2023

  30. [36]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Structural phase transition, s±-wave pair- ing, and magnetic stripe order in bilayered superconduc- tor La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Nat. Commun. 15, 2470 (2024)

    2024

  31. [37]

    Z. Liao, L. Chen, G. Duan, Y. Wang, C. Liu, R. Yu, and Q. Si, Electron correlations and superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under pressure tuning, Phys. Rev. B 108, 214522 (2023)

    2023

  32. [38]

    Qu, D.-W

    X.-Z. Qu, D.-W. Qu, J. Chen, C. Wu, F. Yang, W. Li, and G. Su, Bilayer t-J-J⊥ model and magnetically me- diated pairing in the pressurized nickelate La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036502 (2024)

    2024

  33. [39]

    Yang, G.-M

    Y.-f. Yang, G.-M. Zhang, and F.-C. Zhang, Interlayer valence bonds and two-component theory for high- Tc superconductivity of La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 108, L201108 (2023)

    2023

  34. [40]

    Jiang, Z

    K. Jiang, Z. Wang, and F.-C. Zhang, High tempera- ture superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7, Chin. Phys. Lett. (2023)

    2023

  35. [41]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Trends in electronic structures and s±- wave pairing for the rare-earth series in bilayer nickelate superconductor R3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B 108, 165141 (2023)

    2023

  36. [42]

    Huang, Z

    J. Huang, Z. D. Wang, and T. Zhou, Impurity and vor- tex states in the bilayer high-temperature superconduc- tor La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B 108, 174501 (2023)

    2023

  37. [43]

    Qin and Y.-F

    Q. Qin and Y.-F. Yang, High- Tc superconductivity by mobilizing local spin singlets and possible route to higher Tc in pressurized La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B 108, L140504 (2023)

    2023

  38. [44]

    Y.-H. Tian, Y. Chen, J.-M. Wang, R.-Q. He, and Z.-Y. Lu, Correlation effects and concomitant two-orbital s±- wave superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 under high pres- sure, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165154 (2024)

    2024

  39. [45]

    Jiang, J

    R. Jiang, J. Hou, Z. Fan, Z.-J. Lang, and W. Ku, Pressure driven fractionalization of ionic spins results in cupratelike high- Tc superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 126503 (2024)

    2024

  40. [46]

    D.-C. Lu, M. Li, Z.-Y. Zeng, W. Hou, J. Wang, F. Yang, and Y.-Z. You, Superconductivity from dop- ing symmetric mass generation insulators: Appli- cation to La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11195 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  41. [47]

    Kitamine, M

    N. Kitamine, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Theoretical designing of multiband nickelate and palladate su- perconductors with d8+δ configuration, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12750 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Z. Luo, B. Lv, M. Wang, W. W´ u, and D.-X. Yao, High- Tc superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 based on the bilayer two-orbital t-J model, npj Quantum Materials 9, 61 (2024)

    2024

  43. [49]

    Zhang, H.-K

    J.-X. Zhang, H.-K. Zhang, Y.-Z. You, and Z.-Y. Weng, Strong pairing originated from an emergent Z2 berry phase in La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 126501 (2024)

    2024

  44. [50]

    Z. Pan, C. Lu, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Effect of rare-earth element substitution in superconducting R3Ni2O7 under pressure, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.06173 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  45. [51]

    Sakakibara, M

    H. Sakakibara, M. Ochi, H. Nagata, Y. Ueki, H. Saku- rai, R. Matsumoto, K. Terashima, K. Hirose, H. Ohta, M. Kato, Y. Takano, and K. Kuroki, Theoretical analy- sis on the possibility of superconductivity in the trilayer ruddlesden-popper nickelate La 4Ni3O10 under pressure and...

    2024

  46. [52]

    Lange, L

    H. Lange, L. Homeier, E. Demler, U. Schollw¨ ock, A. Bohrdt, and F. Grusdt, Pairing dome from an emer- gent feshbach resonance in a strongly repulsive bilayer model, Phys. Rev. B 110, L081113 (2024). 9

    2024

  47. [53]

    Geisler, J

    B. Geisler, J. J. Hamlin, G. R. Stewart, R. G. Hennig, and P. Hirschfeld, Structural transitions, octahedral ro- tations, and electronic properties of A3Ni2O7 rare-earth nickelates under high pressure, npj Quantum Materials 9, 38 (2024)

    2024

  48. [54]

    H. Yang, H. Oh, and Y.-H. Zhang, Strong pairing from doping-induced feshbach resonance and second fermi liquid through doping a bilayer spin-one mott insulator: application to La 3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15095 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  49. [55]

    L. C. Rhodes and P. Wahl, Structural routes to stabilize superconducting La 3Ni2O7 at ambient pressure, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 044801 (2024)

    2024

  50. [56]

    Lange, L

    H. Lange, L. Homeier, E. Demler, U. Schollw¨ ock, F. Grusdt, and A. Bohrdt, Feshbach resonance in a strongly repulsive bilayer model: a possible scenario for bilayer nickelate superconductors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15843 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  51. [57]

    Kaneko, H

    T. Kaneko, H. Sakakibara, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Pair correlations in the two-orbital hubbard ladder: Im- plications for superconductivity in the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B 109, 045154 (2024)

    2024

  52. [58]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Electronic structure, magnetic correlations, and superconducting pairing in the reduced ruddlesden- popper bilayer La 3Ni2O6 under pressure: Different role of d3z2−r2 orbital compared with La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B 109, ...

    2024

  53. [59]

    Ouyang, J.-M

    Z. Ouyang, J.-M. Wang, J.-X. Wang, R.-Q. He, L. Huang, and Z.-Y. Lu, Hund electronic correlation in La 3Ni2O7 under high pressure, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115114 (2024)

    2024

  54. [60]

    Heier, K

    G. Heier, K. Park, and S. Y. Savrasov, Competing dxy and s± pairing symmetries in superconducting La3Ni2O7: LDA + FLEX calculations, Phys. Rev. B 109, 104508 (2024)

    2024

  55. [61]

    N. Yuan, A. Elghandour, J. Arneth, K. Dey, and R. Klingeler, High-pressure crystal growth and inves- tigation of the metal-to-metal transition of ruddles- den–popper trilayer nickelates La 4Ni3O10, J. Cryst. Growth 627, 127511 (2024)

    2024

  56. [62]

    Li, C.-Q

    J. Li, C.-Q. Chen, C. Huang, Y. Han, M. Huo, X. Huang, P. Ma, Z. Qiu, J. Chen, X. Hu, et al., Struc- tural transition, electric transport, and electronic struc- tures in the compressed trilayer nickelate La 4Ni3O10, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 117403 (2024)

    2024

  57. [63]

    Fan, J.-F

    Z. Fan, J.-F. Zhang, B. Zhan, D. Lv, X.-Y. Jiang, B. Normand, and T. Xiang, Superconductivity in nick- elate and cuprate superconductors with strong bilayer coupling, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024514 (2024)

    2024

  58. [64]

    Geisler, L

    B. Geisler, L. Fanfarillo, J. J. Hamlin, G. R. Stewart, R. G. Hennig, and P. Hirschfeld, Optical properties and electronic correlations in La 3Ni2O7−δ bilayer nickelates under high pressure, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04258 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  59. [65]

    X. Wu, H. Yang, and Y.-H. Zhang, Deconfined fermi liquid to fermi liquid transition and superconducting in- stability, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.08753 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  60. [66]

    Y. Wang, K. Jiang, Z. Wang, F.-C. Zhang, and J. Hu, The electronic and magnetic structures of bi- layer La 3Ni2O7 at ambient pressure, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15097 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  61. [67]

    B¨ otzel, F

    S. B¨ otzel, F. Lechermann, J. Gondolf, and I. M. Eremin, Theory of magnetic excitations in multilayer nickelate superconductor La 3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.16151 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  62. [68]

    Yang, K.-Y

    Q.-G. Yang, K.-Y. Jiang, D. Wang, H.-Y. Lu, and Q.- H. Wang, Effective model and s±-wave superconductiv- ity in trilayer nickelate La 4Ni3O10, Phys. Rev. B 109, L220506 (2024)

    2024

  63. [69]

    Y. Li, X. Du, Y. Cao, C. Pei, M. Zhang, W. Zhao, K. Zhai, R. Xu, Z. Liu, Z. Li, J. Zhao, G. Li, Y. Qi, H. Guo, Y. Chen, and L. Yang, Electronic correlation and pseudogap-like behavior of high-temperature su- perconductor La 3Ni2O7, Chin. Phys. Lett. 41, 087402 (2024)

    2024

  64. [70]

    Huang and T

    J. Huang and T. Zhou, Interlayer pairing-induced par- tially gapped fermi surface in trilayer La 4Ni3O10 super- conductors, Phys. Rev. B 110, L060506 (2024)

    2024

  65. [71]

    N. Wang, G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Hou, J. Luo, X. Ma, H. Yang, L. Shi, J. Dou, J. Feng, J. Yang, Y. Shi, Z. Ren, H. Ma, P. Yang, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Zhang, X. Dong, Y. Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, S. Calder, J. Yan, J. Sun, B. Wang, R. Zhou, Y. Uwatoko, and J. Cheng, Bulk high-temperatur...

    2024

  66. [72]

    M. Li, Y. Wang, C. Pei, M. Zhang, N. Li, J. Guan, M. Amboage, N.-D. Adama, Q. Kong, Y. Qi, and W. Yang, Distinguishing electronic band structure of single-layer and bilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates probed by in-situ high pressure X-ray absorption near- edge spectroscopy, a...

    2024 arXiv

  67. [73]

    Jiang, Y.-H

    K.-Y. Jiang, Y.-H. Cao, Q.-G. Yang, H.-Y. Lu, and Q.- H. Wang, Theory of pressure dependence of supercon- ductivity in bilayer nickelate La 3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17861 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  68. [74]

    X. Zhou, W. He, Z. Zhou, K. Ni, M. Huo, D. Hu, Y. Zhu, E. Zhang, Z. Jiang, S. Zhang, S. Su, J. Jiang, Y. Yan, Y. Wang, D. Shen, X. Liu, J. Zhao, M. Wang, M. Liu, Z. Du, and D. Feng, Revealing nanoscale struc- tural phase separation in La 3Ni2O7−δ single crystal via scanning ne...

    2024 arXiv

  69. [75]

    G. Wang, N. Wang, T. Lu, S. Calder, J. Yan, L. Shi, J. Hou, L. Ma, L. Zhang, J. Sun, B. Wang, S. Meng, M. Liu, and J. Cheng, Chemical versus physical pressure effects on the structure transition of bilayer nickelates, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09421 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  70. [76]

    C.-Q. Chen, Z. Luo, M. Wang, W. W´ u, and D.-X. Yao, Trilayer multiorbital models of La 4Ni3O10, Phys. Rev. B 110, 014503 (2024)

    2024

  71. [77]

    Yang, Decomposition of multilayer superconduc- tivity with interlayer pairing, Phys

    Y.-f. Yang, Decomposition of multilayer superconduc- tivity with interlayer pairing, Phys. Rev. B 110, 104507 (2024)

    2024

  72. [78]

    S. Ryee, N. Witt, and T. O. Wehling, Quenched pair breaking by interlayer correlations as a key to super- conductivity in La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 096002 (2024)

    2024

  73. [79]

    X. Chen, J. Zhang, A. S. Thind, S. Sharma, H. LaBol- lita, G. Peterson, H. Zheng, D. P. Phelan, A. S. Botana, R. F. Klie, and J. F. Mitchell, Polymorphism in the Ruddlesden–Popper nickelate La 3Ni2O7: Discovery of a hidden phase with distinctive layer stacking, J. Am. Chem. So...

    2024

  74. [80]

    Z. Dong, M. Huo, J. Li, J. Li, P. Li, H. Sun, L. Gu, Y. Lu, M. Wang, Y. Wang, and Z. Chen, Visualiza- 10 tion of oxygen vacancies and self-doped ligand holes in La3Ni2O7−δ, Nature 630, 847 (2024)

    2024

  75. [81]

    C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Interplay of two Eg orbitals in superconducting La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 110, 094509 (2024)

    2024

  76. [82]

    Q. Qin, J. Wang, and Y.-f. Yang, Frustrated super- conductivity in the trilayer nickelate La 4Ni3O10, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04340 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  77. [83]

    D.-K. Seo, W. Liang, M.-H. Whangbo, Z. Zhang, and M. Greenblatt, Electronic band structure and madelung potential study of the nickelates La 2NiO4, La 3Ni2O7, and La4Ni3O10, Inorg. Chem. 35, 6396 (1996)

    1996

  78. [84]

    Ichikawa, S

    N. Ichikawa, S. Uchida, J. Tranquada, T. Niem¨ oller, P. Gehring, S.-H. Lee, and J. Schneider, Local magnetic order vs superconductivity in a layered cuprate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1738 (2000)

    2000

  79. [85]

    Dai, Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors, Rev

    P. Dai, Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 855 (2015)

    2015

  80. [86]

    T. Xie, M. Huo, X. Ni, F. Shen, X. Huang, H. Sun, H. C. Walker, D. Adroja, D. Yu, B. Shen, L. He, K. Cao, and M. Wang, Strong interlayer magnetic exchange coupling in La3Ni2O7−δ revealed by inelastic neutron scattering, Sci. Bull. 69, 3221 (2024)

    2024

  81. [87]

    X. Du, Y. Li, Y. Cao, C. Pei, M. Zhang, W. Zhao, K. Zhai, R. Xu, Z. Liu, Z. Li,et al., Correlated electronic structure and density-wave gap in trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19853 (2024)

    2024

  82. [88]

    Kakoi, T

    M. Kakoi, T. Oi, Y. Ohshita, M. Yashima, K. Kuroki, T. Kato, H. Takahashi, S. Ishiwata, Y. Adachi, N. Hatada, T. Uda, and H. Mukuda, Multiband metal- lic ground state in multilayered nickelates La3Ni2O7 and La4Ni3O10 probed by 139La-NMR at ambient pressure, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. ...

    2024

  83. [89]

    T. Xie, M. Huo, X. Ni, F. Shen, X. Huang, H. Sun, H. C. Walker, D. Adroja, D. Yu, B. Shen, L. He, K. Cao, and M. Wang, Neutron scattering studies on the high-tc superconductor La3Ni2O7−δ at ambient pressure, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12635 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  84. [90]

    LaBollita, V

    H. LaBollita, V. Pardo, M. R. Norman, and A. S. Botana, Electronic structure and magnetic properties of La3Ni2O7 under pressure: active role of the Ni- dx2−y2 orbitals, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17279 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  85. [91]

    Fukamachi, Y

    T. Fukamachi, Y. Kobayashi, T. Miyashita, and M. Sato, 139La NMR studies of layered perovskite sys- tems La3Ni2O7−δ and La4Ni3O10, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 62, 195 (2001)

    2001

  86. [92]

    J.-J. Feng, T. Han, J.-P. Song, M.-S. Long, X.-Y. Hou, C.-J. Zhang, Q.-G. Mu, and L. Shan, Unaltered density wave transition and pressure-induced signature of su- perconductivity in Nd-doped La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B 110, L100507 (2024)

    2024

  87. [93]

    Y. Meng, Y. Yang, H. Sun, S. Zhang, J. Luo, M. Wang, F. Hong, X. Wang, and X. Yu, Density-wave-like gap evolution in La 3Ni2O7 under high pressure re- vealed by ultrafast optical spectroscopy, arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.19678 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  88. [94]

    S. Fan, Z. Luo, M. Huo, Z. Wang, H. Li, H. Yang, M. Wang, D.-X. Yao, and H.-H. Wen, Tunneling spectra with gaplike features observed in nickelate La3Ni2O7 at ambient pressure, Phys. Rev. B 110, 134520 (2024)

    2024

  89. [95]

    Chen, Y.-H

    Y. Chen, Y.-H. Tian, J.-M. Wang, R.-Q. He, and Z.- Y. Lu, Non-fermi liquid and antiferromagnetic correla- tions with hole doping in the bilayer two-orbital hub- bard model of La 3Ni2O7 at zero temperature, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13737 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  90. [96]

    L.-F. Lin, Y. Zhang, N. Kaushal, G. Alvarez, T. A. Maier, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Magnetic phase dia- gram of a two-orbital model for bilayer nickelates vary- ing doping, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.05689 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  91. [97]

    M. Xu, G. C. Jose, A. Rutherford, H. Wang, S. Zhang, R. J. Cava, H. Zhou, W. Bi, and W. Xie, Pressure- induced phase transitions in bilayer La 3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18840 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  92. [98]

    Y. Li, Y. Cao, L. Liu, P. Peng, H. Lin, C. Pei, M. Zhang, H. Wu, X. Du, W. Zhao, K. Zhai, X. Zhang, J. Zhao, M. Lin, P. Tan, Y. Qi, G. Li, H. Guo, L. Yang, and L. Yang, Distinct ultrafast dynamics of bilayer and trilayer nickelate superconductors re- garding the density-wave-l...

    2024 doi

  93. [99]

    I. V. Leonov, Electronic correlations and spin-charge- density stripes in double-layer La3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15298 (2024)

    2024

  94. [100]

    Khasanov, T

    R. Khasanov, T. J. Hicken, D. J. Gawryluk, L. P. Sorel, S. B¨ otzel, F. Lechermann, I. M. Eremin, H. Luetkens, and Z. Guguchia, Pressure-induced split of the den- sity wave transitions in La 3Ni2O7−δ, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10485 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  95. [101]

    K. Chen, X. Liu, J. Jiao, M. Zou, C. Jiang, X. Li, Y. Luo, Q. Wu, N. Zhang, Y. Guo, et al., Evidence of spin density waves in La 3Ni2O7−δ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 256503 (2024)

    2024

  96. [102]

    Z. Dan, Y. Zhou, M. Huo, Y. Wang, L. Nie, M. Wang, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Spin-density-wave transition in double-layer nickelate La3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03952 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  97. [103]

    Z. Liu, H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Ma, Y. Ji, E. Yi, L. Li, H. Liu, J. Yu, Z. Zhang, Z. Chen, F. Liang, H. Dong, H. Guo, D. Zhong, B. Shen, S. Li, and M. Wang, Evi- dence for charge and spin density waves in single crys- tals of La3Ni2O7 and La3Ni2O6, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 66...

    2023

  98. [104]

    Z. Liu, M. Huo, J. Li, Q. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Dai, X. Zhou, J. Hao, Y. Lu, M. Wang, and H.-H. Wen, Electronic correlations and partial gap in the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7, Nat. Commun. 15, 7570 (2024)

    2024

  99. [105]

    G. Wu, J. Neumeier, and M. Hundley, Magnetic suscep- tibility, heat capacity, and pressure dependence of the electrical resistivity of La 3Ni2O7 and La4Ni3O10, Phys. Rev. B 63, 245120 (2001)

    2001

  100. [106]

    Gupta, R

    N. Gupta, R. Gong, Y. Wu, M. Kang, C. Parzyck, B. Gregory, N. Costa, R. Sutarto, S. Sarker, A. Singer, et al. , Anisotropic spin stripe domains in bilayer La3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.03210 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  101. [108]

    Xu, C.-Q

    S. Xu, C.-Q. Chen, M. Huo, D. Hu, H. Wang, Q. Wu, R. Li, D. Wu, M. Wang, D.-X. Yao, et al., Origin of the density wave instability in trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10 revealed by optical and ultrafast spectroscopy, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19161 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  102. [109]

    Zhang, C

    B. Zhang, C. Xu, and H. Xiang, Emergent spin- charge-orbital order in superconductor La3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.18473 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  103. [110]

    LaBollita, V

    H. LaBollita, V. Pardo, M. R. Norman, and A. S. 11 Botana, Assessing the formation of spin and charge stripes in La3Ni2O7 from first-principles, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14409 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  104. [111]

    C. Qin, K. Foyevtsova, L. Si, G. A. Sawatzky, and M. Jiang, Intertwined charge and spin density wave state of La 3Ni2O7, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15649 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  105. [112]

    X.-W. Yi, Y. Meng, J.-W. Li, Z.-W. Liao, W. Li, J.-Y. You, B. Gu, and G. Su, Nature of charge density waves and metal-insulator transition in pressurized La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B 110, L140508 (2024)

    2024

  106. [113]

    X.-S. Ni, Y. Ji, L. He, T. Xie, D.-X. Yao, M. Wang, and K. Cao, First-principles study on spin density wave in La 2PrNi2O7−δ, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.19213 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  107. [114]

    Z. Huo, P. Zhang, Z. Zhang, D. Duan, and T. Cui, Elec- tronic correlations and hund’s rule coupling in trilayer nickelate La 4Ni3O10, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00327 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  108. [115]

    I. V. Leonov, Electronic structure and magnetic correla- tions in the trilayer nickelate superconductor La4Ni3O10 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 109, 235123 (2024)

    2024

  109. [116]

    Tian, H.-T

    P.-F. Tian, H.-T. Ma, X. Ming, X.-J. Zheng, and H. Li, Effective model and electron correlations in trilayer nickelate superconductor La 4Ni3O10, J. Phys.: Con- dens. Matter 36, 355602 (2024)

    2024

  110. [117]

    J.-X. Wang, Z. Ouyang, R.-Q. He, and Z.-Y. Lu, Non- fermi liquid and hund correlation in La 4Ni3O10 under high pressure, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165140 (2024)

    2024

  111. [118]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  112. [119]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vy- drov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  113. [120]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopoten- tials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  114. [121]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+ U study, Physical Review B 57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  115. [122]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  116. [123]

    for the hopping integrals of the TB model

    See the Supplemental Materials at ... for the hopping integrals of the TB model

  117. [124]

    H. Li, X. Zhou, T. Nummy, J. Zhang, V. Pardo, W. E. Pickett, J. F. Mitchell, and D. S. Dessau, Fermiology and electron dynamics of trilayer nickelate La 4Ni3O10, Nat. Commun. 8, 704 (2017)

    2017

  118. [125]

    Takimoto, T

    T. Takimoto, T. Hotta, and K. Ueda, Strong-coupling theory of superconductivity in a degenerate hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 69, 104504 (2004)

    2004

  119. [126]

    Yada and H

    K. Yada and H. Kontani, Origin of weak pseudogap be- haviors in Na 0.35CoO2: Absence of small hole pockets, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 2161 (2005)

    2005

  120. [127]

    Kubo, Pairing symmetry in a two-orbital hubbard model on a square lattice, Phys

    K. Kubo, Pairing symmetry in a two-orbital hubbard model on a square lattice, Phys. Rev. B 75, 224509 (2007)

    2007

  121. [128]

    Graser, T

    S. Graser, T. Maier, P. Hirschfeld, and D. Scalapino, Near-degeneracy of several pairing channels in multi- orbital models for the Fe pnictides, New J. Phys. 11, 025016 (2009)

    2009

  122. [129]

    Liu, C.-C

    F. Liu, C.-C. Liu, K. Wu, F. Yang, and Y. Yao, d+ id’ chiral superconductivity in bilayer silicene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 066804 (2013)

    2013

  123. [130]

    Zhang, J.-J

    M. Zhang, J.-J. Hao, X. Wu, and F. Yang, Lifshitz transition enhanced triplet pz-wave superconductivity in hydrogen-doped KCr3As3, Phys. Rev. B 105, 134509 (2022)

    2022

  124. [131]

    Kuroki, S

    K. Kuroki, S. Onari, R. Arita, et al., Unconventional pairing originating from the disconnected fermi surfaces of superconducting LaFeAsO 1−xFx, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008)

    2008

  125. [133]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Prediction of s ±-wave superconductiv- ity enhanced by electronic doping in trilayer nicke- lates La 4Ni3O10 under pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 136001 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.