Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

It\^{o}, Stratonovich, and zoom-in schemes in stochastic inflation

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Alternating between classical drift and quantum kicks, stochastic inflation's zoom-in scheme matches Itô integration in the slow-roll limit, and the two rules coincide when modes are tracked exactly.

desk verdict A clean formalization of the alternating zoom-in scheme as Itô, but the claimed non-Markovian Itô–Stratonovich equality only holds for the H0-anchored coarse-graining prescription. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12465 v3 pith:BKCHGG3P submitted 2024-11-19 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th

Eemeli Tomberg This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
keywords stochasticinflationItôversusStratonovichzeno-inschemecoarse-grainingscaleseparateuniverseapproximationnon-Markoviannoiseslow-rolldifferentialequations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The noise in stochastic inflation is not an external bath: it is generated by the coarse-graining scale itself, so the correct way to integrate the stochastic equations should follow from the physics of that 'zoom-in' process. This paper makes that link explicit by introducing the alternating zoom-in scheme, in which classical deterministic evolution and instantaneous kicks from newly stretched modes alternate. In the Markovian slow-roll limit the scheme reduces to the Itô interpretation, while Stratonovich integration would make the kick depend on the post-kick field value and has no similar physical picture. In the full non-Markovian system, where the short-wavelength mode functions are promoted to dynamical variables, Itô and Stratonovich coincide, and again match the alternating scheme. If these claims hold, the Itô convention is the physically motivated default for stochastic inflation, and any apparent Stratonovich shift is an artifact of the Markovian approximation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the alternating zoom-in scheme, a discretization in which the coarse-graining scale $R$ stays fixed during classical evolution and then jumps to its new value instantaneously, injecting the modes between the two scales as delta-function kicks; in the $dN \to 0$ limit the kicks become the white noises $\xi_\phi$ and $\xi_\pi$ in the stochastic equations. The load-bearing identity is that in the Markovian case the kick's diffusion coefficient is evaluated at the pre-kick value after drift but without noise, so no $\xi^2$ term survives, matching the Itô rule; for Stratonovich the midpoint evaluation would generate the extra drift $(\sigma/2)\,\partial_\varphi\sigma$. In the non-Markovian case the same expansion gives a contribution $\partial\sigma/\partial\Phi_l \, \sigma_l$ that vanishes because $\sigma$ depends only on the perturbation components $\delta\phi_k$, $\delta\pi_k$, whose drift receives no noise. That vanishing of the correction term is what makes Itô, Stratonovich, and the alternating scheme agree in the full system.

What would settle it

Recompute the expansion with a coarse-graining scale defined as $R = 1/(\sigma a H(\phi_R,\pi_R))$ so the diffusion components depend on the stochastic background; if non-vanishing extra drift terms appear at order $dN$, the claimed equality of Itô and Stratonovich in the non-Markovian setup fails. A numerical cross-check is to evolve the full equations for a steep potential where the slow-roll parameters change abruptly and compare the alternating scheme against the Stratonovich midpoint rule; discrepancies would show the scheme choice still matters.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Stochastic inflation's noise comes from a fixed comoving coarse-graining radius $R_\sigma = 1/(\sigma a H_0)$ shrinking relative to physical scales, so modes continually cross the scale and join the coarse-grained local universe. The paper's central claim is that this zoom-in process, implemented as alternating steps of classical drift and instantaneous kicks, defines the stochastic integral: in the slow-roll Markovian limit the step-wise rule reduces exactly to Itô's scheme, with the kick amplitude evaluated before the kick, whereas Stratonovich's midpoint rule would require the noise to know the post-kick field value. In the general non-Markovian case the mode functions $\delta\phi_k$ and $\delta\pi_k$ are promoted to first-class stochastic variables; the diffusion matrix then depends on the current perturbation values, whose own noise components vanish, so the extra Stratonovich drift term disappears and Itô and Stratonovich give the same evolution. The alternating scheme remains valid in both regimes. The paper also shows the Itô–Stratonovich drift difference is suppressed by $H/M_{\mathrm{Pl}}$ and only becomes significant at super-Planckian energy densities, where the Markovian slow-roll equation is no longer trustworthy.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on anchoring the comoving coarse-graining scale to a non-stochastic initial Hubble parameter $H_0$ rather than to the local stochastic Hubble parameter $H$; if the scale followed $H$, the noise would depend directly on the stochastic field variables and the vanishing of the Itô–Stratonovich correction in the full setup would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Numerical codes that implement stochastic inflation in the slow-roll limit can safely use the simple Euler/Itô update or the alternating scheme; both give the same distribution, as demonstrated for a $\phi^2$ potential.
  • In non-Markovian simulations that evolve mode functions alongside the background, the choice of Itô versus Stratonovich is irrelevant; the physical result is scheme-independent.
  • Any significant difference between Itô and Stratonovich in a Markovian calculation signals that the Markovian approximation is breaking down and the full mode-resolved equations should be used.
  • The two-step finite zoom-in scheme, with a single macroscopic jump between classical evolution periods, reproduces the setup of the classical $\Delta N$ formalism and fixes which super-Hubble modes contribute to the initial distribution.
  • Stochastic velocities and energies are not physical: because kicks are changes of coarse-graining perspective, a large stochastic field velocity carries no energy scale and cannot by itself invalidate the effective theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: recompute the non-Markovian expansion with the coarse-graining scale anchored to the local stochastic Hubble parameter $H$ instead of the initial value $H_0$; a non-vanishing extra drift would delimit exactly where the Itô–Stratonovich coincidence stops.
  • The paper states that the multifield generalization is trivial; spelling it out would give a concrete check of whether the vanishing correction survives extra fields and spectator sectors.
  • The lighthouse analogy suggests a criterion for when a stochastic variable is 'fictitious': if its rapid variation arises purely from changing a bookkeeping scale, it carries no energy, a criterion that could be imported to other effective theories with moving cutoffs.
  • A two-step finite zoom-in benchmark could make the optimal-scheme question quantitative: comparing a classical $\Delta N$ calculation with a single macroscopic jump against full stochastic inflation on the same model would show how much accuracy the $dN \to 0$ limit actually buys.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Itô versus Stratonovich ambiguity in stochastic inflation and proposes a physical interpretation based on a "zoom-in" picture. The coarse-graining scale is changed in discrete steps: deterministic evolution with fixed comoving scale alternates with instantaneous kicks that add newly exited short-wavelength modes to the coarse-grained field. The paper claims that in the Markovian slow-roll limit this alternating scheme reduces to the Itô prescription, whereas the Stratonovich prescription has no analogous physical picture; it also claims that in the full non-Markovian setup, after promoting the mode functions to dynamical variables, the Itô and Stratonovich prescriptions coincide and both match the alternating scheme. A numerical example with quadratic inflation and a pedagogical appendix on stochastic calculus support the presentation.

Significance. If the central claims survive scrutiny, the paper would give a concrete, physically motivated resolution of a long-standing interpretational question in stochastic inflation, and it would clarify the connection between stochastic inflation, linear perturbation theory, and the classical ΔN formalism. The paper is clearly written, the Markovian expansion in Section 3.2 is correct, and the numerical demonstration in Section 3.4 usefully shows where the two interpretations differ. The main weakness is that the non-Markovian equality of Itô and Stratonovich is tied to a specific choice of coarse-graining scale, a point that the paper states only in a footnote and then presents in the abstract and conclusions as a general result.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1 and footnote 3] The claimed equality of Itô and Stratonovich in the full non-Markovian setup is convention-dependent. The argument that the correction in Eq. (4.8) vanishes uses the structural property in Eq. (4.2) that σα_i depends only on δφ_k and δπ_k, not on φ_R and π_R. This property follows from the choice Rσ = 1/(σ a H0) with non-stochastic H0. If one instead uses the equally common local prescription R = 1/(σ a H(φ_R, π_R)), then kσ depends on φ_R and π_R, so σα_i in Eq. (4.4) acquires explicit dependence on the directly noisy background variables. The term (∂σα_i/∂φ_R) σφ_R ξ² dN (and its π_R analogue) is then generically nonzero, so the O(dN) Stratonovich correction does not vanish. The abstract, Section 4.1, and Section 5 present the vanishing difference as a general result; this should be qualified to the H0-anchored coarse-graining convention, and the local-H case should be discussed explicitly.
  2. [§4.1, Eqs. (4.2) and (4.8)] The statement that the result is general "beyond the exact forms of μ and σ" because of the shapes in Eq. (4.2) overreaches. The vanishing of (4.8) relies on two simultaneous properties: the diffusion coefficients do not depend on the directly noisy variables, and the mode functions receive no direct noise. These properties are not dictated by stochastic inflation itself but by the chosen split between background and modes and by the anchoring of the coarse-graining scale to H0. For a different window function or a different split where the mode equations carry noise, the same expansion would produce a nonzero correction. The generality claim in Section 4.1 should be restricted to the explicit setup constructed in Sections 2.2–2.3.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typos: "phi2 inflation" in the Introduction should be "φ² inflation"; "secion 3.3" in Section 4.1 should be "section 3.3"; "corresponsing" in Section 3.5 should be "corresponding".
  2. [Figure 1] The axis label "ar=H-1" is easy to misread; using "ar = H^{-1}" and "R_σ" consistently would improve clarity.
  3. [§4.1, Eq. (4.9)] In the alternating scheme for the non-Markovian case, σα_i is evaluated at N rather than N+ in the kick step, whereas the analogous Markovian scheme (3.9) evaluates the noise amplitude after the drift step. The difference is subleading in dN, but the notation would be clearer if the two lines of (4.9) used the same time argument for the post-drift state.
  4. [§3.2] The equivalence between the alternating scheme and Itô is close to being definitional, since the drift step contains no O(√dN) component and therefore σ evaluated after the drift agrees with σ evaluated before it to the relevant order. The paper could state this more explicitly to avoid the impression that the expansion in Eq. (3.10) is doing additional work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Itô/alternating-scheme equivalence and the non-Markovian Itô–Stratonovich equality are derived from independently stated physical and structural assumptions, not from their conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's central derivations are self-contained. The alternating zoom-in scheme (Section 2.3) is introduced independently of Itô, from the physical picture of alternating classical evolution and instantaneous kicks (Eqs. 2.19–2.20). The derivation that this scheme matches the Itô step (Section 3.2, Eqs. 3.9–3.10) is a direct O(dN) expansion, relying on the fact that the drift step contains no O(sqrt(dN)) stochastic component; this is a property of the scheme, not a restatement of Itô. The non-Markovian equality (Section 4.1) is likewise derived from the stated structure of the promoted system (Eq. 4.2), with the Stratonovich correction (Eq. 4.8) vanishing because the mode variables carry no direct noise. The H0-anchored coarse-graining scale (footnote 3) is an explicitly declared convention, not a fitted parameter or a prediction; the generality claim in Section 4.1 may overreach if one adopts the local-H prescription instead, but that is a scope/correctness caveat, not a circular reduction. Self-citations (e.g., [24,33,40]) appear as prior usage or numerical implementation and are not load-bearing evidence. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction and no known result is repackaged as new.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central equivalence results rest on the standard separate-universe and linear-mode approximations, plus two scheme-specific postulates: the H0-anchored coarse-graining scale and the alternating drift-then-kick order. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • sigma (coarse-graining parameter) = ~0.01 (typical value cited in Section 3.5)
    Chosen by hand to set the coarse-graining scale R_sigma = 1/(sigma a H0). The leading-order Markovian noise amplitude is independent of sigma, so this parameter does not affect the central equivalence claims, but it is part of the scheme definition.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Separate universe approximation: each super-Hubble patch evolves as an independent local FLRW universe to leading order in the gradient expansion.
    Invoked in Section 2.2 to derive the local Friedmann equations (2.15). This is standard in stochastic inflation.
  • domain assumption Short-wavelength modes are treated linearly and evolve in the classical background without direct stochastic noise (equation 2.18).
    Section 2.2: 'I used the classical background equations without the noise terms.' This structure is what makes the non-Markovian Itô-Stratonovich correction vanish in Section 4.1.
  • ad hoc to paper The coarse-graining scale is R_sigma = 1/(sigma a H0) with non-stochastic H0, rather than tied to the local stochastic Hubble parameter.
    Footnote 3: using the stochastic H would lead to complications. This choice removes any direct dependence of the noise coefficient on phi_R and pi_R, and is load-bearing for the non-Markovian equality.
  • ad hoc to paper The alternating zoom-in scheme (deterministic drift followed by instantaneous kick) is the correct discretization of the physical mode-crossing process.
    Section 2.3 defines the scheme and Section 5 asserts it as the physical interpretation. The paper motivates it but does not derive it from the underlying field theory.
  • domain assumption In the squeezed super-Hubble limit, quantum correlators become classical and the two noise components are fully correlated, giving a single classical Gaussian noise.
    End of Section 2.2: 'the quantum properties of the correlators get suppressed... behave like classical random fields.' This is needed to treat the kicks as consistent classical noise.
  • domain assumption Markovian slow-roll noise: H is approximately constant over a mode's sub-Hubble evolution, giving |delta_phi_k| = H/(sqrt(2) k^(3/2)).
    Section 3, leading-order slow roll. This defines the regime where the Itô versus Stratonovich difference is computed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of It\^{o}, Stratonovich, and zoom-in schemes in stochastic inflation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BKCHGG3P

@misc{pith2026241112465,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: It\^o, Stratonovich, and zoom-in schemes in stochastic inflation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BKCHGG3P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12465}
}
abstract

The It\^{o} and Stratonovich approaches are two ways to integrate stochastic differential equations. Detailed knowledge of the origin of the stochastic noise is needed to determine which approach suits a particular problem. I discuss this topic pedagogically in stochastic inflation, where the noise arises from a changing comoving coarse-graining scale or, equivalently, from `zooming in' into inflating space. I introduce a zoom-in scheme where deterministic evolution alternates with instantaneous zoom-in steps. I show that this alternating zoom-in scheme is equivalent to the It\^{o} approach in the Markovian limit, while the Stratonovich approach doesn't have a similar interpretation. In the full non-Markovian setup, the difference vanishes. The framework of zoom-in schemes clarifies the relationship between computations in stochastic inflation, linear perturbation theory, and the classical $\Delta N$ formalism. It informs the numerical implementation of stochastic inflation and is a building block for a first-principles derivation of the stochastic equations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deviations from Gaussian White Noise in Stochastic Inflation

    gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Relaxing the sharp cutoff or the Bunch-Davies initial state in stochastic inflation makes the noise colored, and relaxing the initial state also makes it non-Gaussian.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10 [1807.06211]

    arXiv 2020

  2. [2]

    Salopek and J.R

    D.S. Salopek and J.R. Bond,Nonlinear evolution of long wavelength metric fluctuations in inflationary models, Phys. Rev. D42 (1990) 3936

    1990

  3. [3]

    Wands, K.A

    D. Wands, K.A. Malik, D.H. Lyth and A.R. Liddle,A New approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 043527 [astro-ph/0003278]

    arXiv 2000

  4. [4]

    Sasaki and E.D

    M. Sasaki and E.D. Stewart,A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation, Prog. Theor. Phys.95 (1996) 71 [astro-ph/9507001]

    arXiv 1996

  5. [5]

    Sasaki and T

    M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka,Superhorizon scale dynamics of multiscalar inflation, Prog. Theor. Phys. 99 (1998) 763 [gr-qc/9801017]

    arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    Lyth, K.A

    D.H. Lyth, K.A. Malik and M. Sasaki,A General proof of the conservation of the curvature perturbation, JCAP 05 (2005) 004 [astro-ph/0411220]. 18In (A.10), I replacedξ2 t by 1 by appealing to the nature of the noise; here, the same is straightforwardly accomplished by theξt integration. – 27 –

    arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    Starobinsky,STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE, Lect

    A.A. Starobinsky,STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE, Lect. Notes Phys.246 (1986) 107

    1986

  8. [8]

    Lawler,Stochastic calculus: An introduction with applications,

    G.F. Lawler,Stochastic calculus: An introduction with applications,

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tada and T. Takesako,A new algorithm for calculating the curvature perturbations in stochastic inflation, JCAP 12 (2013) 036 [1308.4754]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Fujita, M

    T. Fujita, M. Kawasaki and Y. Tada,Non-perturbative approach for curvature perturbations in stochastic δN formalism, JCAP 10 (2014) 030 [1405.2187]

    2014 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Vennin and A.A

    V. Vennin and A.A. Starobinsky,Correlation Functions in Stochastic Inflation, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 413 [1506.04732]

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Carr and S.W

    B.J. Carr and S.W. Hawking,Black holes in the early Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168 (1974) 399

    1974

  5. [13]

    Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum, Astrophys

    B.J. Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum, Astrophys. J. 201 (1975) 1

    1975

  6. [14]

    Pattison, V

    C. Pattison, V. Vennin, H. Assadullahi and D. Wands,Quantum diffusion during inflation and primordial black holes, JCAP 10 (2017) 046 [1707.00537]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Cruces, C

    D. Cruces, C. Germani and T. Prokopec,Failure of the stochastic approach to inflation beyond slow-roll, JCAP 03 (2019) 048 [1807.09057]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Ezquiaga and J

    J.M. Ezquiaga and J. García-Bellido,Quantum diffusion beyond slow-roll: implications for primordial black-hole production, JCAP 08 (2018) 018 [1805.06731]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Biagetti, G

    M. Biagetti, G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias and A. Riotto,Primordial Black Holes from Inflation and Quantum Diffusion, JCAP 07 (2018) 032 [1804.07124]

    2018 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Firouzjahi, A

    H. Firouzjahi, A. Nassiri-Rad and M. Noorbala,Stochastic Ultra Slow Roll Inflation, JCAP 01 (2019) 040 [1811.02175]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Ezquiaga, J

    J.M. Ezquiaga, J. García-Bellido and V. Vennin,The exponential tail of inflationary fluctuations: consequences for primordial black holes, JCAP 03 (2020) 029 [1912.05399]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Pattison, V

    C. Pattison, V. Vennin, H. Assadullahi and D. Wands,Stochastic inflation beyond slow roll, JCAP 07 (2019) 031 [1905.06300]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Prokopec and G

    T. Prokopec and G. Rigopoulos,∆N and the stochastic conveyor belt of ultra slow-roll inflation, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 083505 [1910.08487]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Ando and V

    K. Ando and V. Vennin,Power spectrum in stochastic inflation, JCAP 04 (2021) 057 [2012.02031]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    De and R

    A. De and R. Mahbub,Numerically modeling stochastic inflation in slow-roll and beyond, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 123509 [2010.12685]

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Figueroa, S

    D.G. Figueroa, S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg,Non-Gaussian Tail of the Curvature Perturbation in Stochastic Ultraslow-Roll Inflation: Implications for Primordial Black Hole Production, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 101302 [2012.06551]

    2021

  17. [25]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Rey, M. Taoso and A. Urbano,Stochastic inflationary dynamics beyond slow-roll and consequences for primordial black hole formation, JCAP 08 (2020) 043 [2006.14597]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Vennin,Stochastic inflation and primordial black holes, Ph.D

    V. Vennin,Stochastic inflation and primordial black holes, Ph.D. thesis, U. Paris-Saclay, 6,

  19. [27]

    Cruces and C

    D. Cruces and C. Germani,Stochastic inflation at all order in slow-roll parameters: Foundations, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 023533 [2107.12735]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Rigopoulos and A

    G. Rigopoulos and A. Wilkins,Inflation is always semi-classical: diffusion domination overproduces Primordial Black Holes, JCAP 12 (2021) 027 [2107.05317]. – 28 –

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Pattison, V

    C. Pattison, V. Vennin, D. Wands and H. Assadullahi,Ultra-slow-roll inflation with quantum diffusion, JCAP 04 (2021) 080 [2101.05741]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Achucarro, S

    A. Achucarro, S. Cespedes, A.-C. Davis and G.A. Palma,The hand-made tail: non-perturbative tails from multifield inflation, JHEP 05 (2022) 052 [2112.14712]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Hooshangi, M.H

    S. Hooshangi, M.H. Namjoo and M. Noorbala,Rare events are nonperturbative: Primordial black holes from heavy-tailed distributions, Phys. Lett. B834 (2022) 137400 [2112.04520]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Tomberg,A numerical approach to stochastic inflation and primordial black holes, J

    E. Tomberg,A numerical approach to stochastic inflation and primordial black holes, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2156 (2021) 012010 [2110.10684]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Figueroa, S

    D.G. Figueroa, S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg,Implications of stochastic effects for primordial black hole production in ultra-slow-roll inflation, JCAP 05 (2022) 027 [2111.07437]

    2022

  26. [34]

    Tada and V

    Y. Tada and V. Vennin,Statistics of coarse-grained cosmological fields in stochastic inflation, JCAP 02 (2022) 021 [2111.15280]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Cruces,Review on Stochastic Approach to Inflation, Universe 8 (2022) 334 [2203.13852]

    D. Cruces,Review on Stochastic Approach to Inflation, Universe 8 (2022) 334 [2203.13852]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Ahmadi, M

    N. Ahmadi, M. Noorbala, N. Feyzabadi, F. Eghbalpoor and Z. Ahmadi,Quantum diffusion in sharp transition to non-slow-roll phase, JCAP 08 (2022) 078 [2207.10578]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Animali and V

    C. Animali and V. Vennin,Primordial black holes from stochastic tunnelling, JCAP 02 (2023) 043 [2210.03812]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Jackson, H

    J.H.P. Jackson, H. Assadullahi, K. Koyama, V. Vennin and D. Wands,Numerical simulations of stochastic inflation using importance sampling, JCAP 10 (2022) 067 [2206.11234]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Tomberg,Numerical stochastic inflation constrained by frozen noise, JCAP 04 (2023) 042 [2210.17441]

    E. Tomberg,Numerical stochastic inflation constrained by frozen noise, JCAP 04 (2023) 042 [2210.17441]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Tomberg,Stochastic constant-roll inflation and primordial black holes, Phys

    E. Tomberg,Stochastic constant-roll inflation and primordial black holes, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 043502 [2304.10903]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Asadi, A

    K. Asadi, A. Nassiri-Rad and H. Firouzjahi,Stochastic multiple fields inflation: Diffusion dominated regime, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 123537 [2304.00577]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Briaud and V

    V. Briaud and V. Vennin,Uphill inflation, JCAP 06 (2023) 029 [2301.09336]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Mishra, E.J

    S.S. Mishra, E.J. Copeland and A.M. Green,Primordial black holes and stochastic inflation beyond slow roll. Part I. Noise matrix elements, JCAP 09 (2023) 005 [2303.17375]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Raatikainen, S

    S. Raatikainen, S. Räsänen and E. Tomberg,Primordial Black Hole Compaction Function from Stochastic Fluctuations in Ultraslow-Roll Inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 121403 [2312.12911]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Vennin and D

    V. Vennin and D. Wands,Quantum diffusion and large primordial perturbations from inflation, 2402.12672

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Jackson, H

    J.H.P. Jackson, H. Assadullahi, A.D. Gow, K. Koyama, V. Vennin and D. Wands,Stochastic inflation beyond slow roll: noise modelling and importance sampling, 2410.13683

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Itô,Stochastic integral, Proceedings of the Imperial Academy20 (1944) 519

    K. Itô,Stochastic integral, Proceedings of the Imperial Academy20 (1944) 519

    1944

  40. [48]

    Stratonovich,A new representation for stochastic integrals and equations, SIAM Journal on Control 4 (1966) 362 [https://doi.org/10.1137/0304028]

    R.L. Stratonovich,A new representation for stochastic integrals and equations, SIAM Journal on Control 4 (1966) 362 [https://doi.org/10.1137/0304028]

    1966 doi

  41. [49]

    Itô and Stratonovich; a guide for the perplexed - OATML

    “Itô and Stratonovich; a guide for the perplexed - OATML.” https://oatml.cs.ox.ac.uk/blog/2022/03/22/ito-strat.html

    2022

  42. [50]

    van Kampen,Itô versus Stratonovich, Journal of Statistical Physics24 (1981) 175

    N.G. van Kampen,Itô versus Stratonovich, Journal of Statistical Physics24 (1981) 175

    1981

  43. [51]

    Mannella and P.V.E

    R. Mannella and P.V.E. McCLINTOCK,ITÔ VERSUS STRATONOVICH: 30 YEARS LATER, Fluctuation and Noise Letters11 (2012) 1240010. – 29 –

    2012

  44. [52]

    Salopek and J.R

    D.S. Salopek and J.R. Bond,Stochastic inflation and nonlinear gravity, Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 1005

    1991

  45. [53]

    Mezhlumian and A.A

    A. Mezhlumian and A.A. Starobinsky,Stochastic inflation: New results, inThe First International A.D. Sakharov Conference on Physics, 10, 1991 [astro-ph/9406045]

    1991 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Linde, D.A

    A.D. Linde, D.A. Linde and A. Mezhlumian,From the Big Bang theory to the theory of a stationary universe, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 1783 [gr-qc/9306035]

    1994 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Winitzki and A

    S. Winitzki and A. Vilenkin,Uncertainties of predictions in models of eternal inflation, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 4298 [gr-qc/9510054]

    1996 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Garriga and A

    J. Garriga and A. Vilenkin,Recycling universe, Phys. Rev. D57 (1998) 2230 [astro-ph/9707292]

    1998 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Vilenkin,On the factor ordering problem in stochastic inflation, Phys

    A. Vilenkin,On the factor ordering problem in stochastic inflation, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 123506 [gr-qc/9902007]

    1999 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Winitzki,Eternal inflation (2008), 10.1142/6923

    S. Winitzki,Eternal inflation (2008), 10.1142/6923

    2008 doi

  51. [59]

    Tokuda and T

    J. Tokuda and T. Tanaka,Statistical nature of infrared dynamics on de Sitter background, JCAP 02 (2018) 014 [1708.01734]

    2018 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Pinol, S

    L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel and Y. Tada,Inflationary stochastic anomalies, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 07LT01 [1806.10126]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Pinol, S

    L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel and Y. Tada,A manifestly covariant theory of multifield stochastic inflation in phase space: solving the discretisation ambiguity in stochastic inflation, JCAP 04 (2021) 048 [2008.07497]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Malik and D

    K.A. Malik and D. Wands,Cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rept. 475 (2009) 1 [0809.4944]

    2009 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Birrell and P.C.W

    N.D. Birrell and P.C.W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1982), 10.1017/CBO9780511622632

    1982 doi

  56. [64]

    Grain and V

    J. Grain and V. Vennin,Canonical transformations and squeezing formalism in cosmology, JCAP 02 (2020) 022 [1910.01916]

    2020 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Kloeden and E

    P.E. Kloeden and E. Platen,Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (1992), 10.1007/978-3-662-12616-5

    1992 doi

  58. [66]

    Foster,Numerical approximations for stochastic differential equations, Ph.D

    J.M. Foster,Numerical approximations for stochastic differential equations, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford, 2020

    2020

  59. [67]

    Goncharov, A.D

    A.S. Goncharov, A.D. Linde and V.F. Mukhanov,The Global Structure of the Inflationary Universe, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A2 (1987) 561

    1987

  60. [68]

    Guth,Inflation and eternal inflation, Phys

    A.H. Guth,Inflation and eternal inflation, Phys. Rept. 333 (2000) 555 [astro-ph/0002156]

    2000 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Linde,A brief history of the multiverse, Rept

    A. Linde,A brief history of the multiverse, Rept. Prog. Phys.80 (2017) 022001 [1512.01203]

    2017 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Linde,ETERNAL CHAOTIC INFLATION, Mod

    A.D. Linde,ETERNAL CHAOTIC INFLATION, Mod. Phys. Lett. A1 (1986) 81

    1986

  63. [71]

    Dimopoulos,Ultra slow-roll inflation demystified, Phys

    K. Dimopoulos,Ultra slow-roll inflation demystified, Phys. Lett. B775 (2017) 262 [1707.05644]

    2017 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Lyth and A.R

    D.H. Lyth and A.R. Liddle,The primordial density perturbation: Cosmology, inflation and the origin of structure(2009)

    2009

  65. [73]

    Karam, N

    A. Karam, N. Koivunen, E. Tomberg, V. Vaskonen and H. Veermäe,Anatomy of single-field inflationary models for primordial black holes, JCAP 03 (2023) 013 [2205.13540]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Figueroa, A

    D.G. Figueroa, A. Florio, F. Torrenti and W. Valkenburg,The art of simulating the early Universe – Part I, JCAP 04 (2021) 035 [2006.15122]. – 30 –

    2021 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Cohen, D

    T. Cohen, D. Green and A. Premkumar,A tail of eternal inflation, SciPost Phys. 14 (2023) 109 [2111.09332]

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Cohen, D

    T. Cohen, D. Green and A. Premkumar,Large deviations in the early Universe, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 083501 [2212.02535]

    2023 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Jackson, H

    J.H.P. Jackson, H. Assadullahi, A.D. Gow, K. Koyama, V. Vennin and D. Wands,The separate-universe approach and sudden transitions during inflation, JCAP 05 (2024) 053 [2311.03281]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Zakamska,Theory of Special Relativity, 1511.02121

    N.L. Zakamska,Theory of Special Relativity, 1511.02121

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    Peskin and D.V

    M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA (1995), 10.1201/9780429503559

    1995 doi

  72. [80]

    Y.-F. Cai, X. Chen, M.H. Namjoo, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang and Z. Wang,Revisiting non-Gaussianity from non-attractor inflation models, JCAP 05 (2018) 012 [1712.09998]

    2018 arXiv

  73. [81]

    V. Atal, J. Garriga and A. Marcos-Caballero,Primordial black hole formation with non-Gaussian curvature perturbations, JCAP 09 (2019) 073 [1905.13202]

    2019 arXiv

  74. [82]

    V. Atal, J. Cid, A. Escrivà and J. Garriga,PBH in single field inflation: the effect of shape dispersion and non-Gaussianities, JCAP 05 (2020) 022 [1908.11357]

    2020 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Biagetti, V

    M. Biagetti, V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias and A. Riotto,The formation probability of primordial black holes, Phys. Lett. B820 (2021) 136602 [2105.07810]

    2021 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Hooshangi, A

    S. Hooshangi, A. Talebian, M.H. Namjoo and H. Firouzjahi,Multiple field ultraslow-roll inflation: Primordial black holes from straight bulk and distorted boundary, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 083525 [2201.07258]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Pi and M

    S. Pi and M. Sasaki,Logarithmic Duality of the Curvature Perturbation, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 011002 [2211.13932]

    2023 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Firouzjahi and A

    H. Firouzjahi and A. Riotto,Primordial Black Holes and loops in single-field inflation, JCAP 02 (2024) 021 [2304.07801]

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Hooshangi, M.H

    S. Hooshangi, M.H. Namjoo and M. Noorbala,Tail diversity from inflation, JCAP 09 (2023) 023 [2305.19257]

    2023 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Pi,Non-Gaussianities in primordial black hole formation and induced gravitational waves, 2404.06151

    S. Pi,Non-Gaussianities in primordial black hole formation and induced gravitational waves, 2404.06151

    arXiv

  81. [89]

    Artigas, S

    D. Artigas, S. Pi and T. Tanaka,Extended δN formalism, 2408.09964

    arXiv

  82. [90]

    R. Inui, H. Motohashi, S. Pi, Y. Tada and S. Yokoyama,Constant roll and non-Gaussian tail in light of logarithmic duality, JCAP 02 (2025) 042 [2409.13500]

    2025 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Ballesteros, T

    G. Ballesteros, T. Konstandin, A. Pérez Rodríguez, M. Pierre and J. Rey,Non-Gaussian tails without stochastic inflation, JCAP 11 (2024) 013 [2406.02417]

    2024 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Tokuda and T

    J. Tokuda and T. Tanaka,Can all the infrared secular growth really be understood as increase of classical statistical variance?, JCAP 11 (2018) 022 [1806.03262]

    2018 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Launay, G.I

    Y.L. Launay, G.I. Rigopoulos and E.P.S. Shellard,Stochastic inflation in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 123523 [2401.08530]

    2024 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Roldán, I

    É. Roldán, I. Neri, R. Chetrite, S. Gupta, S. Pigolotti, F. Jülicher et al.,Martingales for physicists: a treatise on stochastic thermodynamics and beyond, Advances in Physics72 (2023) 1 [https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2024.2317494]. – 31 –

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.