Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

Bridging Boundaries: $T\bar{T}$, Double Holography, and Reflected Entropy

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a $T\bar T$-deformed AdS$_3$/BCFT$_2$ setup, the island and defect extremal surface prescriptions for reflected entropy agree to first order in the radial cutoff.

desk verdict A careful, transparent extension of the island/DES program to reflected entropy in T-Tbar-deformed BCFT2, whose results are plausible but inherit an acknowledged caveat in the holographic dictionary. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12827 v2 pith:EBSDCG2Z submitted 2024-11-19 hep-th

Debarshi Basu , Himanshu Chourasiya , Ankur Dey , Vinayak Raj This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords T\barTdeformationreflectedentropyislandformuladefectextremalsurfaceAdS3/BCFT2Pagecurveblackholeevaporationdoubleholography
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In plain terms, the paper claims that the reflected entropy of bipartite mixed states in a $T\bar T$-deformed boundary conformal field theory can be computed by two different holographic prescriptions, and that the answers coincide to first order in the deformation scale. The island formula on the lower-dimensional boundary side is compared with the defect extremal surface formula in the bulk for disjoint intervals, adjacent intervals, and time-dependent eternal black hole configurations with radiation. In every case the leading correction, linear in the radial cutoff $z_c$, matches between the two prescriptions. If the agreement holds, the island framework for mixed-state entanglement survives finite-cutoff holography, and reflected entropy retains a Page-curve structure whose transition time is shifted by the deformation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the double-holographic dictionary for reflected entropy, realized through two formulas that are compared term by term. Reflected entropy is defined as the von Neumann entropy of half of the canonical purification of a mixed state, and in holography it is dual to twice the minimal entanglement wedge cross-section. The bulk computation uses the defect extremal surface formula, which adds the entropy of defect matter on the end-of-the-world brane to the area of the bulk cross-section. The boundary computation uses the island formula for reflected entropy, which extremizes an effective reflected entropy together with an island-area term. The two are linked by a partial Randall-Sundrum reduction that produces the lower-dimensional gravity-plus-matter description, and the comparison is made as a perturbative expansion in $z_c$.

What would settle it

Compute the island and defect extremal surface reflected entropies at order $z_c^2$ (or at finite $z_c$ numerically) in the same configurations; if the two prescriptions diverge at quadratic or higher order, the claimed equivalence is only a leading-order artifact. A second test would be to recompute the linear correction using mixed boundary conditions for the wall instead of a hard Dirichlet cutoff and see whether the match survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the defect extremal surface prescription for reflected entropy in an asymptotically AdS$_3$ geometry with a finite radial cutoff and an end-of-the-world brane is equivalent, up to and including first order in the cutoff $z_c$, to the island-formula computation in the lower-dimensional effective description. The paper demonstrates this by extremizing the generalized reflected entropy, inserting the extremal island or cross-section locations, expanding in $z_c$, and using the Brown-Henneaux relation to identify central charge and Newton's constant. The matching is shown explicitly for two disjoint intervals and two adjacent intervals at zero temperature, and for the time-dependent configurations describing two black-hole interiors, a black-hole interior with radiation, and two radiation subsystems. For the radiation subsystems the reflected entropy exhibits a Page-curve analogue with a discontinuity at the Page time whose size is given in eq. (4.44).

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the standard cutoff holographic dual for $T\bar T$-deformed theories remains valid when conformal matter is placed on the end-of-the-world brane inside the bulk, an assumption the paper itself identifies as a known weak point.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The island formula and the defect extremal surface formula produce the same leading-order reflected entropy, so the mixed-state island framework remains consistent when a finite radial cutoff is introduced.
  • The agreement covers static disjoint and adjacent intervals and time-dependent eternal black hole configurations, extending the island/DES equivalence beyond pure-state entanglement entropy.
  • The reflected entropy of two radiation subsystems has a Page-curve analogue: a no-island phase at early times is replaced by an island phase after the Page time, with the gap at the transition given by eq. (4.44).
  • The $T\bar T$ deformation shifts the Page time and changes how it depends on the brane angle, an effect visible in the plots and in eq. (4.42).
  • In the no-island phase of two radiation subsystems, the reflected entropy receives no linear correction in the cutoff, so the first deformation effect appears only at higher order.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equivalence is demonstrated only to linear order in the cutoff; a natural next check is whether the two prescriptions continue to agree at order $z_c^2$, which would separate a genuine identity from a leading-order coincidence.
  • If the standard cutoff dual for $T\bar T$ deformed theories is indeed invalid once conformal matter sits on the end-of-the-world brane, as the paper itself flags, then the matching may be between two quantities computed in an unjustified bulk; recomputation with mixed boundary conditions could change even the linear corrections.
  • The same two-sided comparison could be run for other mixed-state measures such as entanglement negativity or odd entanglement entropy in this deformed setup, giving a broader test of the island/DES equivalence.
  • The reflected-entropy Page curve with a discontinuity at the Page time, if confirmed by an independent replica calculation, would sharpen the interpretation of $T\bar T$ deformation as moving the observer closer to the black hole.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper computes reflected entropy for bipartite mixed states in a T-Tbar-deformed BCFT2 using two holographic prescriptions: the island formula in the effective lower-dimensional description and the defect extremal surface (DES) formula in an AdS3 bulk with a finite Dirichlet wall and an end-of-the-world brane carrying defect matter. For static disjoint and adjacent intervals, and for time-dependent configurations involving an eternal black hole and radiation, it reports agreement of the leading-order O(z_c) corrections between the two prescriptions, and it constructs Page-curve analogues for reflected entropy with a discontinuity at the Page time. All extremization steps are performed perturbatively to linear order in the radial cutoff, and the paper explicitly leaves the all-orders and direct-CFT checks to future work.

Significance. If the underlying holographic dictionary were established, the explicit matching formulas would provide a useful leading-order consistency check connecting the island formula, defect extremal surfaces, and reflected entropy in a T-Tbar-deformed setting. The paper is careful to present many separate configurations and phases, and it is unusually honest in Section 5 about the main caveat. However, the physical interpretation of the agreement is conditional: both computations live in the same auxiliary bulk geometry, so the match is an internal consistency check of that geometry rather than an independent derivation of reflected entropy in the T-Tbar-deformed BCFT. The explicit acknowledgement of the breakdown of the McGough-Mezei-Verlinde proposal in the presence of bulk conformal matter is a credit to the authors, but it also means the central claim needs to be reframed or supplemented before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sections 2.3 and 5] The central claim of the paper is conditional on the validity of the holographic T-Tbar proposal of McGough-Mezei-Verlinde [50] in a setup with conformal matter on the end-of-the-world brane. The paper itself states in Section 5: 'the well-known breakdown of the holographic proposal in [50] upon the inclusions of bulk conformal matter,' and defers a re-examination to mixed boundary conditions [53]. Because both the island and the DES computations are performed inside the same auxiliary AdS3 geometry, their leading-order agreement does not test that dictionary assumption; it is an internal consistency check. The no-backreaction argument in Section 2.3 does not resolve this objection, since the failure of the cutoff proposal with matter concerns the boundary stress tensor and the dictionary itself, not only the classical backreaction. To make the advertised claim 'agreement of the leading order correction' physically meaningful, the paper should either provide a direct leading-order computation of reflected entropy in the T-Tbar-deformed BCFT using conformal perturbation theory along the lines of Refs. [66, 68, 72], redo the analysis with the mixed-boundary-condition proposal [53], or explicitly present the results as conditional consistency checks and temper the abstract and conclusion accordingly.
  2. [Section 5] The paper states that the deformation effects are imposed through 'the induced metric on the radial cut-off surface' and that 'It will be interesting to explicitly verify the credibility of this approach by developing a perturbation theory for the T-Tbar-deformed BCFT from scratch.' This means the boundary island computation is not yet a computation in the T-Tbar-deformed CFT itself; it is an effective-description computation with the same bulk input as the DES side. For this reason, the statement in Section 5 that the agreement 'reinforces the validity of our approach' overstates what has been shown. The manuscript should either supply the missing direct deformed-CFT calculation or clearly frame the result as a consistency check within a conjectural doubly holographic framework.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (3.42) and Eq. (3.54)] The logarithm in Eq. (3.42) (and its b1-b3 exchanged version in Eq. (3.54)) has unbalanced brackets: the printed text shows '[b2-b1)' while the intended argument appears to be '[(b2-b1)(b2+b1)/(b1 z_c)]'. Please fix the typography.
  2. [Eq. (4.42)] Equation (4.42) as typeset is ambiguous: it appears to place the factor '2ℓ/(ϵ_y sech(σ0/ℓ))' in the denominator, which would make the argument of cosh^{-1} less than unity for the parameters used in Fig. 20. The formula should be checked against the value actually used to generate the Page-time plots.
  3. [Sections 3.1.1 and 3.2.1] The symbol S^{bulk}_R is used first for the entanglement-wedge cross section (Eq. (3.8), explicitly half the reflected entropy) and then for the full reflected entropy (e.g., Eq. (3.19)). Introducing a separate notation such as E_W for the wedge cross section would avoid a factor-of-two confusion.
  4. [Section 4.5] The text uses 'Hartmann-Maldacena' twice; the standard spelling in the cited literature is 'Hartman-Maldacena'.
  5. [Section 4.3.2] The displayed extremum 'τ = 8τ1/(4+x1^2+τ1^2)' is garbled in the typesetting; the denominator should be written unambiguously so that the subsequent substitution can be checked.
  6. [Section 2.3] Equation (2.14) gives the brane tension as T = tanh(σ0/ℓ)/ℓ, but later in the same subsection the paper says the new EOW brane has tension T = 1/ℓ. These two statements should be reconciled for finite σ0.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DES-island match is a newly computed leading-order consistency check in a deformed geometry; the flagged MMV breakdown is a validity caveat, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that reflected entropy computed from the island formula (2.23) agrees with that from the defect extremal surface formula (2.24) to first order in the radial cutoff zc. I checked the computation chains for each phase: the boundary-side effective reflected entropies come from BCFT twist-field correlators (e.g., eqs. (3.10), (3.20), (3.41), (4.8)), while the bulk-side quantities are genuine geodesic lengths plus defect entropy terms (e.g., eqs. (3.18), (3.31), (3.45), (4.12)). These are different functionals of the interval endpoints and of the island-position variable a; they are not identical by construction. The final agreement is obtained only after independent perturbative extremization over a (e.g., eq. (3.23) vs (3.33), (3.48) vs (3.52)) and expansion in zc. The DES formula was indeed constructed in prior work [33] as the double-holographic counterpart of the island formula, so the match is a consistency check within a conjectural dictionary rather than a test against an external benchmark; but that is a validity/conditionality concern, not a circular reduction. The paper's own Section 5 caveat that the McGough-Mezei-Verlinde proposal breaks down upon including bulk conformal matter is a limitation of the underlying holographic dictionary, not a circular step. No load-bearing premise is justified only by a self-citation: the central setup relies on [50,81] by other authors, and the self-citations [75-78] appear only in the literature review and are not used to force any result. Therefore no step in the derivation reduces to its own input by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard holographic dictionary for T-bar-T deformed CFTs and on the conjectural island and DES formulas for reflected entropy. No new physical entities are introduced. The main free parameters are model parameters (cutoffs and brane angle), not fitted values. The most fragile input is the assumption that the finite-cutoff holographic proposal remains valid with defect conformal matter, which the authors themselves question.

free parameters (4)
  • zc (radial cutoff)
    Cutoff surface position; related to the T-bar-T deformation parameter mu = 8GN zc^2 / ℓ. Not fitted; a model parameter that controls the perturbative expansion.
  • sigma0 (EOW brane angle)
    Location of the end-of-the-world brane; related to brane tension T = tanh(sigma0/ℓ)/ℓ. Input parameter.
  • epsilon_y (brane UV cutoff)
    Short-distance cutoff for the defect CFT on the brane; appears in the reflected entropy expressions.
  • zR (Rindler UV cutoff)
    Cutoff in Rindler coordinates for the time-dependent black hole analysis.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Holographic T-bar-T proposal: T-bar-T-deformed CFT2 is dual to AdS3 with a Dirichlet wall at z = zc
    Used throughout; introduced in Section 2.1. The authors acknowledge a known breakdown with bulk conformal matter in Section 5.
  • domain assumption AdS3/BCFT2 correspondence with an EOW brane and Neumann boundary conditions
    Section 2.2; from refs. [28,29].
  • domain assumption Island formula for reflected entropy (eq. 2.23)
    Section 2.6; proposed in refs. [43,44].
  • domain assumption Defect extremal surface formula for reflected entropy (eq. 2.24)
    Section 2.6; proposed in ref. [33].
  • ad hoc to paper Defect matter on the EOW brane does not backreact and the cutoff prescription remains valid in the large N limit
    Section 2.3, paragraph 'On inclusion of matter in the bulk'. This is the assumption the authors flag as potentially broken in Section 5.
  • standard math Large central charge limit and the form of four-point twist correlators
    Section 2.5; from refs. [36,90].
  • standard math Brown-Henneaux relation c = 3ℓ/(2GN)
    Used to match boundary and bulk expressions.
  • standard math Non-commuting replica limits are taken as n to 1 then m to 1
    Section 2.5; the order is chosen as in refs. [37,88].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bridging Boundaries: $T\bar{T}$, Double Holography, and Reflected Entropy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EBSDCG2Z

@misc{pith2026241112827,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bridging Boundaries: $T\barT$, Double Holography, and Reflected Entropy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EBSDCG2Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12827}
}
abstract

We investigate the reflected entropy for bipartite mixed state configurations in a $T\bar{T}$ deformed boundary conformal field theory in $2$ dimensions (BCFT$_2$). The bulk dual is described by asymptotically AdS$_3$ geometries with the cut off surface pushed deeper into the bulk and truncated by an end of the world brane. We obtain the reflected entropy up to a linear order in the radial cut-off for static and time dependent configurations involving an eternal black hole, from the island and defect extremal surface (DES) prescriptions in the context of the deformed AdS/BCFT. We observe agreement of the leading order correction for all cases between the two prescriptions. We also obtain the analogous of the Page curves for the reflected entropy and investigate the modification due to the $T\bar{T}$ deformation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Holographic Correlators of Boundary/Crosscap CFTs in Two Dimensions

    hep-th 2025-01 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Explicit bulk derivations yield two- and three-point stress tensor correlators in AdS3/BCFT2 and scalar and stress tensor correlators for XCFT2 on RP2, with tension independence and finite-cutoff deformations.

  2. Mixed state entanglement in deformed field theory at finite temperature

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For a TTbar-deformed CFT at finite temperature, the EWCS and holographic entanglement negativity both decrease as the deformation parameter grows, just as they do when temperature increases.

  3. Defects extremal surfaces and interface CFTs

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A generalized defect-extremal-surface prescription for AdS3/ICFT2 is shown to match island-formula entropies in the large-tension limit and to produce Page curves for 2d eternal black holes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [81]

    End of the world brane meetsT T,

    F. Deng, Z. Wang, and Y. Zhou, “End of the world brane meetsT T,” JHEP 07 (2024) 036, arXiv:2310.15031 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [50]

    Moving the CFT into the bulk withT T,

    L. McGough, M. Mezei, and H. Verlinde, “Moving the CFT into the bulk withT T,” JHEP 04 (2018) 010, arXiv:1611.03470 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  3. [53]

    T ¯T and the mirage of a bulk cutoff,

    M. Guica and R. Monten, “T ¯T and the mirage of a bulk cutoff,”SciPost Phys. 10 no. 2, (2021) 024, arXiv:1906.11251 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  4. [1]

    The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao, “The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,”JHEP 03 (2020) 149, arXiv:1908.10996 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [2]

    The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield, “The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,”JHEP 12 (2019) 063, arXiv:1905.08762 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [3]

    Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,”JHEP 05 (2020) 013, arXiv:1911.12333 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [4]

    Entanglement islands in higher dimensions,

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, and J. E. Santos, “Entanglement islands in higher dimensions,” SciPost Phys. 9 no. 1, (2020) 001,arXiv:1911.09666 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [5]

    Islands outside the horizon,

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, and J. Maldacena, “Islands outside the horizon,” arXiv:1910.11077 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1910

Show all 91 references
  1. [6]

    The entropy of Hawking radiation,

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “The entropy of Hawking radiation,” arXiv:2006.06872 [hep-th]

    2006 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Information in black hole radiation,

    D. N. Page, “Information in black hole radiation,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3743–3746, arXiv:hep-th/9306083

    1993 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Average entropy of a subsystem,

    D. N. Page, “Average entropy of a subsystem,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1291–1294, arXiv:gr-qc/9305007

    1993 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Time Dependence of Hawking Radiation Entropy,

    D. N. Page, “Time Dependence of Hawking Radiation Entropy,”JCAP 09 (2013) 028, arXiv:1301.4995 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall, “Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,”JHEP 01 (2015) 073, arXiv:1408.3203 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602, arXiv:hep-th/0603001

    2006 arXiv

  7. [12]

    A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani, and T. Takayanagi, “A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,” JHEP 07 (2007) 062, arXiv:0705.0016 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy,

    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz, and J. Maldacena, “Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy,” JHEP 11 (2013) 074, arXiv:1307.2892 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  9. [14]

    Replica Wormholes and Entanglement Islands in the Karch-Randall Braneworld,

    H. Geng, “Replica Wormholes and Entanglement Islands in the Karch-Randall Braneworld,” arXiv:2405.14872 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  10. [15]

    BCFT entanglement entropy at large central charge and the black hole interior,

    J. Sully, M. V. Raamsdonk, and D. Wakeham, “BCFT entanglement entropy at large central charge and the black hole interior,”JHEP 03 (2021) 167, arXiv:2004.13088 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [16]

    Information radiation in BCFT models of black holes,

    M. Rozali, J. Sully, M. Van Raamsdonk, C. Waddell, and D. Wakeham, “Information radiation in BCFT models of black holes,”JHEP 05 (2020) 004, arXiv:1910.12836 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [17]

    Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part I: Entanglement on the Brane,

    H. Z. Chen, R. C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I. A. Reyes, and J. Sandor, “Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part I: Entanglement on the Brane,”JHEP 10 (2020) 166, arXiv:2006.04851 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [18]

    Quantum Extremal – 43 – Islands Made Easy, Part II: Black Holes on the Brane,

    H. Z. Chen, R. C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I. A. Reyes, and J. Sandor, “Quantum Extremal – 43 – Islands Made Easy, Part II: Black Holes on the Brane,”JHEP 12 (2020) 025, arXiv:2010.00018 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [19]

    Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part IV: Massive Black Holes on the Brane,

    G. Grimaldi, J. Hernandez, and R. C. Myers, “Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part IV: Massive Black Holes on the Brane,”arXiv:2202.00679 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  15. [20]

    BCFT and Islands in Two Dimensions,

    K. Suzuki and T. Takayanagi, “BCFT and Islands in Two Dimensions,”arXiv:2202.08462 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  16. [21]

    Massive islands,

    H. Geng and A. Karch, “Massive islands,”JHEP 09 (2020) 121, arXiv:2006.02438 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [22]

    Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas, and S. Shashi, “Information Transfer with a Gravitating Bath,”SciPost Phys. 10 no. 5, (2021) 103, arXiv:2012.04671 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [23]

    Holographic BCFTs and Communicating Black Holes,

    H. Geng, S. Lüst, R. K. Mishra, and D. Wakeham, “Holographic BCFTs and Communicating Black Holes,” jhep 08 (2021) 003, arXiv:2104.07039 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [24]

    Entanglement Phase Structure of a Holographic BCFT in a Black Hole Background,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas, and S. Shashi, “Entanglement Phase Structure of a Holographic BCFT in a Black Hole Background,” arXiv:2112.09132 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  20. [25]

    Inconsistency of Islands in Theories with Long-Range Gravity,

    H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas, and S. Shashi, “Inconsistency of Islands in Theories with Long-Range Gravity,”arXiv:2107.03390 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  21. [26]

    Double holography in string theory,

    A. Karch, H. Sun, and C. F. Uhlemann, “Double holography in string theory,”JHEP 10 (2022) 012, arXiv:2206.11292 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [27]

    Boundary conformal field theory,

    J. L. Cardy, “Boundary conformal field theory,”arXiv:hep-th/0411189

    arXiv

  23. [28]

    Holographic Dual of BCFT,

    T. Takayanagi, “Holographic Dual of BCFT,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 101602, arXiv:1105.5165 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [29]

    Aspects of AdS/BCFT,

    M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi, and E. Tonni, “Aspects of AdS/BCFT,”JHEP 11 (2011) 043, arXiv:1108.5152 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  25. [30]

    Structure of holographic BCFT correlators from geodesics,

    J. Kastikainen and S. Shashi, “Structure of holographic BCFT correlators from geodesics,” Phys. Rev. D 105 no. 4, (2022) 046007,arXiv:2109.00079 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [31]

    Defect extremal surface as the holographic counterpart of Island formula,

    F. Deng, J. Chu, and Y. Zhou, “Defect extremal surface as the holographic counterpart of Island formula,” JHEP 03 (2021) 008, arXiv:2012.07612 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [32]

    Page curve from defect extremal surface and island in higher dimensions,

    J. Chu, F. Deng, and Y. Zhou, “Page curve from defect extremal surface and island in higher dimensions,” JHEP 10 (2021) 149, arXiv:2105.09106 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [33]

    Defect extremal surface for reflected entropy,

    T. Li, M.-K. Yuan, and Y. Zhou, “Defect extremal surface for reflected entropy,”JHEP 01 (2022) 018, arXiv:2108.08544 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [34]

    Defect extremal surfaces for entanglement negativity,

    D. Basu, H. Parihar, V. Raj, and G. Sengupta, “Defect extremal surfaces for entanglement negativity,” arXiv:2205.07905 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  30. [35]

    Entanglement negativity and defect extremal surface,

    Y. Shao, M.-K. Yuan, and Y. Zhou, “Entanglement negativity and defect extremal surface,” SciPost Phys. Core 7 no. 2, (2024) 027,arXiv:2206.05951 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [36]

    A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section,

    S. Dutta and T. Faulkner, “A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section,” JHEP 03 (2021) 178, arXiv:1905.00577 [hep-th] . – 44 –

    2021 arXiv

  32. [37]

    Reflected entropy in random tensor networks,

    C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin, and P. Rath, “Reflected entropy in random tensor networks,” arXiv:2112.09122 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  33. [38]

    Computable measure of entanglement,

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, “Computable measure of entanglement,”Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 032314, arXiv:quant-ph/0102117

    2002 arXiv

  34. [39]

    Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex,

    M. B. Plenio, “Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That is not Convex,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 no. 9, (2005) 090503,arXiv:quant-ph/0505071

    2005 arXiv

  35. [40]

    Entanglement of purification through holographic duality,

    T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto, “Entanglement of purification through holographic duality,” Nature Phys. 14 no. 6, (2018) 573–577,arXiv:1708.09393 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [41]

    Entanglement of purification: from spin chains to holography,

    P. Nguyen, T. Devakul, M. G. Halbasch, M. P. Zaletel, and B. Swingle, “Entanglement of purification: from spin chains to holography,”JHEP 01 (2018) 098, arXiv:1709.07424 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  37. [42]

    Balanced Partial Entanglement and the Entanglement Wedge Cross Section,

    Q. Wen, “Balanced Partial Entanglement and the Entanglement Wedge Cross Section,” JHEP 04 (2021) 301, arXiv:2103.00415 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [43]

    Reflected Entropy for an Evaporating Black Hole,

    T. Li, J. Chu, and Y. Zhou, “Reflected Entropy for an Evaporating Black Hole,”JHEP 11 (2020) 155, arXiv:2006.10846 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [44]

    Including contributions from entanglement islands to the reflected entropy,

    V. Chandrasekaran, M. Miyaji, and P. Rath, “Including contributions from entanglement islands to the reflected entropy,”Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 8, (2020) 086009,arXiv:2006.10754 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  40. [45]

    Reflected Entropy and Entanglement Wedge Cross Section with the First Order Correction,

    H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, and M. Nishida, “Reflected Entropy and Entanglement Wedge Cross Section with the First Order Correction,”JHEP 12 (2019) 170, arXiv:1909.02806 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [46]

    Islands for entanglement negativity,

    J. Kumar Basak, D. Basu, V. Malvimat, H. Parihar, and G. Sengupta, “Islands for entanglement negativity,” SciPost Phys. 12 no. 1, (2022) 003,arXiv:2012.03983 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [47]

    Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory,”arXiv:hep-th/0401146

    arXiv

  43. [48]

    T ¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories,

    A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. M. Szécsényi, and R. Tateo, “T ¯T-deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories,” JHEP 10 (2016) 112, arXiv:1608.05534 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [49]

    On space of integrable quantum field theories,

    F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “On space of integrable quantum field theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 915 (2017) 363–383, arXiv:1608.05499 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  45. [51]

    Random boundary geometry and gravity dual ofT T deformation,

    S. Hirano and M. Shigemori, “Random boundary geometry and gravity dual ofT T deformation,” JHEP 11 (2020) 108, arXiv:2003.06300 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [52]

    Cutoff AdS3 versus the T T deformation,

    P. Kraus, J. Liu, and D. Marolf, “Cutoff AdS3 versus the T T deformation,” JHEP 07 (2018) 027, arXiv:1801.02714 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  47. [54]

    T T partition function from topological gravity,

    S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko, and G. Hernández-Chifflet, “T T partition function from topological gravity,” JHEP 09 (2018) 158, arXiv:1805.07386 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  48. [55]

    T T deformations, massive gravity and non-critical strings,

    A. J. Tolley, “T T deformations, massive gravity and non-critical strings,”JHEP 06 (2020) 050, arXiv:1911.06142 [hep-th] . – 45 –

    2020 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Background independent holographic dual toT ¯T deformed CFT with large central charge in 2 dimensions,

    V. Shyam, “Background independent holographic dual toT ¯T deformed CFT with large central charge in 2 dimensions,”JHEP 10 (2017) 108, arXiv:1707.08118 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Comments onT ¯T double trace deformations and boundary conditions,

    W. Cottrell and A. Hashimoto, “Comments onT ¯T double trace deformations and boundary conditions,” Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019) 251–255, arXiv:1801.09708 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  51. [58]

    TT deformations in general dimensions,

    M. Taylor, “TT deformations in general dimensions,”arXiv:1805.10287 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  52. [59]

    Holography at finite cutoff with a T 2 deformation,

    T. Hartman, J. Kruthoff, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, “Holography at finite cutoff with a T 2 deformation,” JHEP 03 (2019) 004, arXiv:1807.11401 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Finite Cutoff AdS5 Holography and the Generalized Gradient Flow,

    V. Shyam, “Finite Cutoff AdS5 Holography and the Generalized Gradient Flow,”JHEP 12 (2018) 086, arXiv:1808.07760 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Sphere partition functions \& cut-off AdS,

    P. Caputa, S. Datta, and V. Shyam, “Sphere partition functions \& cut-off AdS,”JHEP 05 (2019) 112, arXiv:1902.10893 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  55. [62]

    A solvable irrelevant deformation of AdS3/CFT2,

    A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki, and D. Kutasov, “A solvable irrelevant deformation of AdS3/CFT2,” JHEP 12 (2017) 155, arXiv:1707.05800 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Holography Beyond AdS,

    M. Asrat, A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki, and D. Kutasov, “Holography Beyond AdS,”Nucl. Phys. B 932 (2018) 241–253, arXiv:1711.02690 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Entanglement entropy andT T deformation,

    W. Donnelly and V. Shyam, “Entanglement entropy andT T deformation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 no. 13, (2018) 131602,arXiv:1806.07444 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  58. [65]

    T T and EE, with implications for (A)dS subregion encodings,

    A. Lewkowycz, J. Liu, E. Silverstein, and G. Torroba, “T T and EE, with implications for (A)dS subregion encodings,” JHEP 04 (2020) 152, arXiv:1909.13808 [hep-th]

    2020

  59. [66]

    Entanglement entropy inT T-deformed CFT,

    B. Chen, L. Chen, and P.-X. Hao, “Entanglement entropy inT T-deformed CFT,” Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 8, (2018) 086025,arXiv:1807.08293 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Entanglement Entropy forT T deformed CFT in general dimensions,

    A. Banerjee, A. Bhattacharyya, and S. Chakraborty, “Entanglement Entropy forT T deformed CFT in general dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B 948 (2019) 114775, arXiv:1904.00716 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Entanglement and Rényi entropy of multiple intervals inT T-deformed CFT and holography,

    H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, and M. Nishida, “Entanglement and Rényi entropy of multiple intervals inT T-deformed CFT and holography,”Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 10, (2019) 106015, arXiv:1906.03894 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Comments on holographic entanglement entropy in T Tdeformed conformal field theories,

    C. Murdia, Y. Nomura, P. Rath, and N. Salzetta, “Comments on holographic entanglement entropy in T Tdeformed conformal field theories,”Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 2, (2019) 026011, arXiv:1904.04408 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Holographic Entanglement Entropy in Cutoff AdS,

    C. Park, “Holographic Entanglement Entropy in Cutoff AdS,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 no. 36, (2019) 1850226,arXiv:1812.00545 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Entropic c–functions in T ¯T , J¯T , T¯J deformations,

    M. Asrat, “Entropic c–functions in T ¯T , J¯T , T¯J deformations,” Nucl. Phys. B 960 (2020) 115186, arXiv:1911.04618 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Correlation functions, entanglement and chaos in theT T /JT-deformed CFTs,

    S. He and H. Shu, “Correlation functions, entanglement and chaos in theT T /JT-deformed CFTs,” JHEP 02 (2020) 088, arXiv:1907.12603 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Entanglement entropy andT T deformations beyond antipodal points from holography,

    S. Grieninger, “Entanglement entropy andT T deformations beyond antipodal points from holography,” JHEP 11 (2019) 171, arXiv:1908.10372 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Aspects of Hyperscaling Violating Geometries at Finite Cutoff,

    S. Khoeini-Moghaddam, F. Omidi, and C. Paul, “Aspects of Hyperscaling Violating Geometries at Finite Cutoff,”JHEP 02 (2021) 121, arXiv:2011.00305 [hep-th] . – 46 –

    2021 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Reflected entropy and timelike entanglement in T¯T deformed CFT2s,

    D. Basu and V. Raj, “Reflected entropy and timelike entanglement in T¯T deformed CFT2s,” arXiv:2402.07253 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  69. [76]

    Odd entanglement entropy in TT¯ deformed CFT2s and holography,

    D. Basu, S. Biswas, A. Dey, B. Paul, and G. Sengupta, “Odd entanglement entropy in TT¯ deformed CFT2s and holography,”Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 12, (2023) 126013, arXiv:2307.04832 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Entanglement negativity in T¯T-deformed CFT2s,

    D. Basu, Lavish, and B. Paul, “Entanglement negativity in T¯T-deformed CFT2s,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 12, (2023) 126026,arXiv:2302.11435 [hep-th]

    2023

  71. [78]

    Entanglement, T¯T and rotating black holes,

    D. Basu and S. Biswas, “Entanglement, T¯T and rotating black holes,”arXiv:2410.06363 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  72. [79]

    Temporal entanglement entropy as a probe of renormalization group flow,

    S. Grieninger, K. Ikeda, and D. E. Kharzeev, “Temporal entanglement entropy as a probe of renormalization group flow,”JHEP 05 (2024) 030, arXiv:2312.08534 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [80]

    The holographicT ¯T deformation of the entanglement entropy in (A)dS3/CFT2,

    J.-C. Chang, S. He, Y.-X. Liu, and L. Zhao, “The holographicT ¯T deformation of the entanglement entropy in (A)dS3/CFT2,” arXiv:2409.08198 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    Holographic boundary conformal field theory withT ¯T deformation,

    F. Deng and Z. Wang, “Holographic boundary conformal field theory withT ¯T deformation,” arXiv:2411.06345 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Conformal field theories in anti-de Sitter space,

    O. Aharony, D. Marolf, and M. Rangamani, “Conformal field theories in anti-de Sitter space,” JHEP 02 (2011) 041, arXiv:1011.6144 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Locally localized gravity,

    A. Karch and L. Randall, “Locally localized gravity,”JHEP 05 (2001) 008, arXiv:hep-th/0011156

    2001 arXiv

  77. [85]

    An Alternative to compactification,

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “An Alternative to compactification,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690–4693, arXiv:hep-th/9906064

    1999 arXiv

  78. [86]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231–252, arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    1998 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,”Commun. Math. Phys. 104 (1986) 207–226

    1986

  80. [88]

    Entanglement Wedge Cross Section from CFT: Dynamics of Local Operator Quench,

    Y. Kusuki and K. Tamaoka, “Entanglement Wedge Cross Section from CFT: Dynamics of Local Operator Quench,” JHEP 02 (2020) 017, arXiv:1909.06790 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  81. [89]

    The Page Curve for Reflected Entropy,

    C. Akers, T. Faulkner, S. Lin, and P. Rath, “The Page Curve for Reflected Entropy,” arXiv:2201.11730 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  82. [90]

    Universality of Long-Distance AdS Physics from the CFT Bootstrap,

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and M. T. Walters, “Universality of Long-Distance AdS Physics from the CFT Bootstrap,”JHEP 08 (2014) 145, arXiv:1403.6829 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors,

    T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, “Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors,” JHEP 05 (2013) 014, arXiv:1303.1080 [hep-th] . – 47 –

    2013 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.