Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Instrument design and performance of the first seven stations of RNO-G

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The first seven Greenland in-ice neutrino radio stations are built, stable, and science-ready.

desk verdict Solid, honest instrument paper for RNO-G's first seven stations; the neutrino-trigger efficiency is simulation-dependent, but the paper is up-front about it and the rest of the performance evidence is strong. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.12922 v2 pith:SSZ7OXIU submitted 2024-11-19 astro-ph.IM

S. Agarwal , J. A. Aguilar , N. Alden , S. Ali , P. Allison , M. Betts , D. Besson , A. Bishop
show 73 more authors
O. Botner S. Bouma S. Buitink R. Camphyn M. Cataldo S. Chiche B. A. Clark A. Coleman K. Couberly S. de Kockere K. D. de Vries C. Deaconu C. Glaser T. Glüsenkamp A. Hallgren S. Hallmann J. C. Hanson B. Hendricks J. Henrichs N. Heyer C. Hornhuber K. Hughes T. Karg A. Karle J. L. Kelley C. Kerr C. Klein M. Korntheuer M. Kowalski I. Kravchenko R. Krebs R. Lahmann U. Latif P. Laub C.-H. Liu M. J. Marsee Z. S. Meyers M. Mikhailova K. Mulrey M. Muzio A. Nelles A. Novikov A. Nozdrina E. Oberla B. Oeyen S. Polfrey N. Punsuebsay L. Pyras M. Ravn M. Reichert J. Rix D. Ryckbosch F. Schlüter O. Scholten D. Seckel M. F. H. Seikh D. Smith J. Stoffels K. Terveer S. Toscano D. Tosi J. Tutt D. J. Van Den Broeck N. van Eijndhoven A. G. Vieregg A. Vijai C. Welling D. R. Williams P. Windischhofer J. Veale S. Wissel R. Young A. Zink
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords ultra-high-energyneutrinosAskaryaneffectin-iceradiodetectionRNO-Gphased-arraytriggerneutrinodetectorcalibrationsolar-poweredGreenlandicesheet
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the first seven stations of the Radio Neutrino Observatory in Greenland (RNO-G) are built, deployed, and performing as designed. Each station uses 24 antennas in 100-meter boreholes and near-surface trenches to listen for the brief radio flash an ultra-high-energy neutrino produces when it interacts in ice. The central result is that the noise environment and the deep trigger thresholds on the four-antenna phased array at the bottom of each power string are stable, with measured trigger efficiencies and livetimes close to design goals. If correct, RNO-G-7 is already a working ultra-high-energy neutrino detector ready for science data-taking, and its design and operational experience directly support the next generation of in-ice radio detectors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the deep phased-array trigger on the power string: four vertically polarized borehole antennas at roughly 100 meters depth, spaced 1 meter apart, whose digitized signals feed a four-channel trigger board in a 100-240 MHz band. A servo loop adjusts per-channel thresholds to hold the deep trigger rate near 1 Hz, and the resulting thresholds show long-term stability. The trigger sits in a custom signal chain—low-noise amplifiers with RF-over-fiber readout, a 24-channel switched-capacitor-array digitizer called Radiant, and in-situ calibration pulsers—that together give the instrument 10-20 picosecond timing resolution at high SNR. The calibration pulsers let the paper convert raw trigger measurements into SNR efficiency curves, and the observed external sources provide cross-checks of pointing, timing, and noise floor.

What would settle it

Trigger the beamforming array with pulses whose spectrum is shaped to match the roughly 100 MHz turn-on frequency of simulated Askaryan signals, or compare the simulated efficiency curves against the first sample of neutrino-candidate events. If the measured 50% efficiency point stays at or above the calibration-pulser value of about 4 SNR instead of moving toward the simulated 2.9-3.4 SNR, the paper's neutrino-sensitivity claim would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is an instrument-level one: the first seven RNO-G stations, deployed on the Greenland ice sheet in 2021 and 2022, meet the design goals for a scalable autonomous in-ice radio neutrino array. The deep trigger, formed from the four lowest vertical-polarization antennas on the power string, operates at a stable roughly 1 Hz rate with thresholds that track the noise environment; the two implemented trigger algorithms reach 50% efficiency at signal-to-noise ratios of 4.3 (coincidence trigger) and 4.0 (beamforming trigger) for calibration pulses, and simulations using Askaryan-like neutrino signals put the beamforming trigger's 50% efficiency at 3.4 and 2.9 SNR for 1-degree and 4-degree off-cone view angles. The beamforming trigger does not reach the whitepaper's optimistic 2.0 SNR target, but the paper treats the achieved 2.9-3.4 SNR as a solid baseline with further algorithm work underway. External radio sources—the Galaxy, solar flares, weather-balloon radiosondes, and aircraft—are observed with the predicted signatures, and the solar-powered stations achieve roughly 50% science uptime with a low-power winter mode that survived two winters. The paper concludes that the design and performance of the initial instrument are established and that the array is ready for science data taking.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on extrapolating trigger performance from calibration pulses to real neutrino signals using simulated Askaryan waveforms, and that extrapolation has not yet been cross-checked with an actual in-ice neutrino event.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The seven installed stations can be used for ultra-high-energy neutrino searches now, with a deep trigger whose rate and thresholds are stable over multi-day periods.
  • The beamforming trigger's 50% efficiency near 2.9-3.4 SNR for simulated Askaryan events sets a realistic physics threshold; the gap to the original 2.0 SNR target is a defined engineering goal, not an unknown.
  • External radio sources provide calibration paths: the Galaxy for absolute amplitude, solar flares for absolute pointing to about half a degree, and radiosondes and aircraft for inter-station timing.
  • The demonstrated roughly 50% solar-powered science uptime and two-winter low-power survival establish that a distributed high-latitude neutrino array can run autonomously.
  • The production-scale deployment of borehole strings, low-power RF chains, and trigger boards retires the key technology risks for scaling toward a 35-station array and a larger successor.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the calibration pulser has a higher turn-on frequency than the simulated Askaryan signals, the in-situ measured trigger thresholds of 4.0-4.3 SNR likely overestimate the true neutrino trigger threshold; a pulser reshaped to match the roughly 100 MHz cutoff could confirm the 2.9-3.4 SNR prediction directly.
  • If the simulated Askaryan pulse shape is accurate, the beamforming trigger's power-integration window is already tuned to off-cone events, and a modest firmware change plus low-band filtering could plausibly close the remaining gap to the 2.0 SNR design goal.
  • The Galactic radio emission, already detected in the upward-facing antennas with the expected sidereal-time modulation, could serve as a continuous in-situ absolute amplitude calibration for the whole array once the current systematic offset is understood.
  • The same station architecture—deep phased-array trigger, RF-over-fiber readout, and solar power with winter hibernation—likely transfers to a larger array, but the weak validation of trigger extrapolation with real neutrino events means the first science run should also record diagnostic pulser events at a range of attenuation settings.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports the design, deployment, and first three years of operation of the first seven stations of the Radio Neutrino Observatory in Greenland (RNO-G-7) near Summit Station. It describes the array layout, the BigRAID drilling system, the three antenna types, the RF-over-fiber signal chains, the Radiant and Flower DAQ/trigger hardware, the calibration pulser system, power and communications, and the installation procedure. The performance section presents station uptimes, time-domain system responses, two-channel timing resolution, zenith pulser scans, the deep-trigger efficiency for both a high-low coincidence trigger and a beamforming trigger, and observations of the Galaxy, weather-balloon radiosondes, airplanes, and solar flares. The authors conclude that the RNO-G-7 instrument design is established, that the array is collecting science data, and that the phased-array trigger has a simulated 50% efficiency at 2.9-3.4 SNR for simulated Askaryan neutrino signals.

Significance. If the performance claims hold, this is an important milestone for the in-ice radio neutrino technique: RNO-G-7 is the first northern-hemisphere array of autonomous, solar-powered in-ice radio stations, and the paper demonstrates production-scale deployment, stable noise-riding trigger thresholds, and multi-source external calibration (Galaxy, radiosonde, airplanes, solar flares). These results are directly useful for the design of IceCube-Gen2. The manuscript is honest about deferred calibration details and about the fact that the neutrino-trigger efficiency is simulation-based. The main quantitative gap is that the headline trigger-efficiency numbers are presented without uncertainties, and the extrapolation from calibration pulses to Askaryan signals rests on NuRadioMC simulations that are not validated by an in-situ neutrino or Askaryan-like source.

major comments (2)
  1. [4.3, Fig. 27] The 50% trigger-efficiency points quoted in the table of Figure 27 (4.3, 4.0, 3.4, 2.9, and 2.7 SNR) are given without statistical or systematic uncertainties, and the measured efficiency curves in the figure have no error bars. Without uncertainties, the reader cannot assess whether the measured pulser efficiencies agree with the trigger simulations, nor whether the simulated Askaryan efficiencies are significantly better than the pulser measurement. Please provide at least the statistical uncertainties from the efficiency-curve fits and a systematic estimate covering the pulser attenuation calibration, the SNR definition in Eq. (4.1), and the finite number of calibration events.
  2. [4.3, Sec. 5] The neutrino-trigger efficiency is the load-bearing quantity for the claim that the deep trigger is ready for science data taking, but it is derived from NuRadioMC simulations of Askaryan signals and is not anchored by any in-situ Askaryan-like source. The paper explicitly states that the calibration pulser has a ~35-45 MHz higher turn-on frequency and is "not an optimal signal source" for the low-band Flower trigger, so the measured pulser efficiency does not validate the neutrino efficiency. The agreement between measured and simulated pulser efficiencies validates the trigger firmware on the pulser waveform only. Please state explicitly in the abstract or summary that the neutrino efficiencies are simulation-based predictions, and add a quantitative estimate, or at least a clear qualitative bound, of the uncertainty arising from the ice model, the in-ice antenna response, and the Askaryan pulse shape.
minor comments (5)
  1. [3.2.1] The sentence "This performance metric has been confirmed in the fielded stations (see Section 4.4)" is not directly supported by Section 4.4, which shows spectra and the Galactic excess but does not present a field measurement of the amplifier noise temperature; please clarify what is confirmed.
  2. [4.4.1] The paragraph on Galactic calibration states that the simulations are scaled to match the data and that a small systematic offset remains, but then concludes that an absolute calibration based on the Galaxy is feasible; please make explicit that this is a future prospect and describe what is needed to close the offset.
  3. [5] The summary says the trigger thresholds "meet the design goals" while a later sentence says the trigger performance "does not reach the optimistic 2.0 SNR threshold design target"; please specify which design goals are met to avoid an apparent contradiction.
  4. [Abstract / metadata] The header contains the placeholder "ArXiv ePrint: 1234.56789"; this should be replaced with the correct preprint identifier.
  5. [Fig. 27] The table of 50% efficiency points is embedded in the figure and is difficult to read; consider moving it to a proper table with uncertainties.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: performance claims are anchored in independent lab calibrations, external radio sources, and openly labeled simulations; the calibration-pulser-to-Askaryan extrapolation is a disclosed validation gap, not a derivation from the paper's own output.

full rationale

The paper is an instrument paper, not a derivation of a physics result from its own output. The central performance claims—uptime, noise spectra, timing resolution, trigger stability, and observations of external sources—are anchored in independent measurements: lab component calibrations (S-parameters, noise temperatures, anechoic-chamber RVELs), in-situ calibration pulsers, GNSS surveying, and external radio sources such as the Galaxy, radiosondes, airplanes, and solar flares. The one extrapolative step, converting measured calibration-pulser trigger efficiency into neutrino trigger efficiency, is performed with NuRadioMC simulations of Askaryan signals and is explicitly labeled as simulation-dependent. The paper states that the calibration pulser turn-on frequency is ~35–45 MHz higher than the Askaryan turn-on and that the pulser is "not an optimal signal source for evaluating the low-band trigger" (Section 4.3). This is a transparent validation gap, not circularity: the simulated neutrino efficiencies (2.9–3.4 SNR) are not fitted to the measured pulser efficiencies (4.0–4.3 SNR), and the paper does not claim that the in-situ pulser validates the neutrino simulation. Self-citations to the RNO-G whitepaper and to NuRadioMC are contextual or code-based, and none is used to forbid alternatives or to define the target result into existence. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central performance claims rest on measured lab and in-situ data, with simulations used for extrapolation. No free parameters are fitted to claim a physics result; the listed parameters are calibration adjustments.

free parameters (3)
  • Ice refractive index model coefficients = not given in paper (see ref [74])
    Exponential-polynomial function fitted to Summit density data, used for propagation and trigger simulations.
  • Per-station antenna position corrections = 20-30 cm
    Calibration fit adjusts antenna positions relative to survey, Section 4.5.
  • Cable delay corrections = O(100 ps)
    Calibration fit adjusts cable delays relative to lab measurements, Section 4.5.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Askaryan effect as the neutrino radio-emission mechanism
    Relied on throughout; confirmed by accelerator measurements but still a model for in-ice signals.
  • domain assumption Ice attenuation and refractive index from prior measurements
    Measured at Summit by RNO-G predecessors [12,25,26].
  • domain assumption Simulation accuracy of XFdtd, WIPL-D, and NuRadioMC
    Used to predict antenna responses and neutrino trigger efficiency; validated against lab and accelerator data, but not fully for in-situ neutrino signals.
  • domain assumption Galactic radio emission model as calibration source
    Used for absolute calibration, with acknowledged systematic uncertainties in Section 4.4.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Instrument design and performance of the first seven stations of RNO-G." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SSZ7OXIU

@misc{pith2026241112922,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Instrument design and performance of the first seven stations of RNO-G},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SSZ7OXIU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.12922}
}
read the original abstract

The Radio Neutrino Observatory in Greenland (RNO-G) is the first in-ice radio array in the northern hemisphere for the detection of ultra-high energy neutrinos via the coherent radio emission from neutrino-induced particle cascades within the ice. The array is currently in phased construction near Summit Station on the Greenland ice sheet, with 7~stations deployed during the first two boreal summer field seasons of 2021 and 2022. In this paper, we describe the installation and system design of these initial RNO-G stations, and discuss the performance of the array as of summer 2024.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scrutinizing the cosmogenic origin of the KM3-230213A event: A Multimessenger Perspective

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multimessenger transport calculation finds that KM3-230213A is plausibly cosmogenic only if it originates from hard-spectrum protons above the ankle with source evolution close to (1+z)^3.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    G. A. Askar’yan,Excess negative charge of an electron-photon shower and its coherent radio emission, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.41(1961) 616–618

    work page 1961

  2. [2]

    Barwick, D

    S. Barwick, D. Besson, P. Gorham and D. Saltzberg,South Polar in situ radio-frequency ice attenuation,Journal of Glaciology51(2005) 231–238

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    M. A. Markov and I. M. Zheleznykh,Large Scale Cherenkov Detectors in Ocean, Atmosphere and Ice,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A248 (1986) 242–251

    work page 1986

  4. [4]

    Kravchenko, S

    I. Kravchenko, S. Hussain, D. Seckel, D. Besson, E. Fensholt, J. Ralston et al.,Updated Results from the RICE Experiment and Future Prospects for Ultra-High Energy Neutrino Detection at the South Pole, Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 062004, [1106.1164]

    arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    Allison et al.,Design and Initial Performance of the Askaryan Radio Array Prototype EeV Neutrino Detector at the South Pole,Astropart

    ARA collaboration, P. Allison et al.,Design and Initial Performance of the Askaryan Radio Array Prototype EeV Neutrino Detector at the South Pole,Astropart. Phys.35 (2012) 457–477, [1105.2854]

    arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Anker et al.,A search for cosmogenic neutrinos with the ARIANNA test bed using 4.5 years of data,JCAP03(2020) 053, [1909.00840]

    ARIANNAcollaboration, A. Anker et al.,A search for cosmogenic neutrinos with the ARIANNA test bed using 4.5 years of data,JCAP03(2020) 053, [1909.00840]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    ANITAcollaboration, P. W. Gorham et al.,The Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna ultra-high energy neutrino detector: Design, performance, and sensitivity for the 2006–2007 balloon flight, Astroparticle Physics32(2009) 10–41

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Abarr et al.,The Payload for Ultrahigh Energy Observations (PUEO): a white paper, Journal of Instrumentation16(Aug., 2021) P08035, [2010.02892]

    PUEO collaboration, Q. Abarr et al.,The Payload for Ultrahigh Energy Observations (PUEO): a white paper, Journal of Instrumentation16(Aug., 2021) P08035, [2010.02892]. – 45 –

    arXiv 2021

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    J. Avva, J. M. Kovac, C. Miki, D. Saltzberg and A. G. Vieregg,An in situ measurement of the radio-frequency attenuation in ice at Summit Station, Greenland,J. Glaciol.61(2015) 1005–1011, [1409.5413]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Avva et al.,Development Toward a Ground-Based Interferometric Phased Array for Radio Detection of High Energy Neutrinos,Nucl

    J. Avva et al.,Development Toward a Ground-Based Interferometric Phased Array for Radio Detection of High Energy Neutrinos,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A869 (2017) 46–55, [1605.03525]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    RNO-Gcollaboration, J. A. Aguilar et al.,Design and Sensitivity of the Radio Neutrino Observatory in Greenland (RNO-G),JINST 16 (2021) P03025, [2010.12279]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    RNO-Gcollaboration, J. A. Aguilar et al.,In situ, broadband measurement of the radio frequency attenuation length at Summit Station, Greenland, Journal of Glaciology68(Dec., 2022) 1234–1242, [2201.07846]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    ANITAcollaboration, P. W. Gorham et al.,Observations of the Askaryan effect in ice,Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 171101, [hep-ex/0611008]

    2007 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Belov et al.,Accelerator measurements of magnetically-induced radio emission from particle cascades with applications to cosmic-ray air showers,Phys

    T-510collaboration, K. Belov et al.,Accelerator measurements of magnetically-induced radio emission from particle cascades with applications to cosmic-ray air showers,Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 141103, [1507.07296]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Bechtol et al.,SLAC T-510 experiment for radio emission from particle showers: Detailed simulation study and interpretation,Phys

    K. Bechtol et al.,SLAC T-510 experiment for radio emission from particle showers: Detailed simulation study and interpretation,Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 063025, [2111.04334]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Ackermann et al.,High-energy and ultra-high-energy neutrinos: A Snowmass white paper, JHEAp 36(2022) 55–110, [2203.08096]

    M. Ackermann et al.,High-energy and ultra-high-energy neutrinos: A Snowmass white paper, JHEAp 36(2022) 55–110, [2203.08096]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Mammen Abraham et al.,Tau neutrinos in the next decade: from GeV to EeV,J

    R. Mammen Abraham et al.,Tau neutrinos in the next decade: from GeV to EeV,J. Phys. G49(2022) 110501, [2203.05591]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Ackermann et al.,Astrophysics Uniquely Enabled by Observations of High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos,Bull

    M. Ackermann et al.,Astrophysics Uniquely Enabled by Observations of High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos,Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51(2019) 185, [1903.04334]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Ackermann et al.,Fundamental Physics with High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos,Bull

    M. Ackermann et al.,Fundamental Physics with High-Energy Cosmic Neutrinos,Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 51(2019) 215, [1903.04333]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    ANITAcollaboration, P. W. Gorham et al.,Constraints on the ultrahigh-energy cosmic neutrino flux from the fourth flight of ANITA,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 122001, [1902.04005]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Allison et al.,Constraints on the diffuse flux of ultrahigh energy neutrinos from four years of Askaryan Radio Array data in two stations, Phys

    ARAcollaboration, P. Allison et al.,Constraints on the diffuse flux of ultrahigh energy neutrinos from four years of Askaryan Radio Array data in two stations, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 043021, [1912.00987]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    IceCube collaboration, M. G. Aartsen et al.,Differential limit on the extremely-high-energy cosmic neutrino flux in the presence of astrophysical background from nine years of IceCube data, Phys. Rev. D 98(2018) 062003, [1807.01820]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Aab et al.,Nanosecond-level time synchronization of autonomous radio detector stations for extensive air showers,JINST 11 (2016) P01018, [1512.02216]

    Pierre Augercollaboration, A. Aab et al.,Nanosecond-level time synchronization of autonomous radio detector stations for extensive air showers,JINST 11 (2016) P01018, [1512.02216]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    RNO-Gcollaboration, J. A. Aguilar et al.,Radiofrequency Ice Dielectric Measurements at Summit Station, Greenland, Journal of Glaciology(2023) 1–12, [2212.10285]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Deaconu, A

    C. Deaconu, A. G. Vieregg, S. A. Wissel, J. Bowen, S. Chipman, A. Gupta et al.,Measurements and Modeling of Near-Surface Radio Propagation in Glacial Ice and Implications for Neutrino Experiments, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 043010, [1805.12576]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    RNO-Gcollaboration, C. Welling et al.,Brief communication: Precision measurement of the index of – 46 – refraction of deep glacial ice at radio frequencies at Summit Station, Greenland,The Cryosphere18 (2024) 3433–3437, [2304.06181]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    K. M. Brunt, R. L. Hawley, E. R. Lutz, M. Studinger, J. G. Sonntag, M. A. Hofton et al.,Assessment of NASA airborne laser altimetry data using ground-based GPS data near Summit Station, Greenland,The Cryosphere11 (2017) 681–692

    2017

  20. [28]

    RNO-Gcollaboration, J. A. Aguilar et al.,Reconstructing the neutrino energy for in-ice radio detectors: A study for the Radio Neutrino Observatory Greenland (RNO-G),Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 147, [2107.02604]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Plaisier, S

    I. Plaisier, S. Bouma and A. Nelles,Reconstructing the arrival direction of neutrinos in deep in-ice radio detectors,Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 443, [2302.00054]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Bouma, A

    IceCube-Gen2collaboration, S. Bouma, A. Nelles et al.,Direction reconstruction for the in-ice radio array of IceCube-Gen2, in38th International Cosmic Ray Conference, 7, 2023.2307.13971

    2023

  23. [31]

    De Kockere, K

    S. De Kockere, K. D. de Vries, N. van Eijndhoven and U. A. Latif,Simulation of in-ice cosmic ray air shower induced particle cascades, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 043023, [2202.09211]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Pyras, C

    L. Pyras, C. Glaser, S. Hallmann and A. Nelles,Atmospheric muons at PeV energies in radio neutrino detectors, JCAP10(2023) 043, [2307.04736]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    J. Rix, R. Mulvaney, J. Hong and D. Ashurst,Development of the British Antarctic Survey Rapid Access Isotope Drill,Journal of Glaciology65 (2019) 288–298

    2019

  26. [34]

    XFdtd Electromagnetic Simulation Software

    “XFdtd Electromagnetic Simulation Software.” https://www.remcom.com/xfdtd-3d-em-simulation-software

  27. [35]

    RNO-Gcollaboration, J. A. Aguilar et al.,Hardware Development for the Radio Neutrino Observatory in Greenland (RNO-G), PoSICRC2021(2021) 1058

    2021

  28. [36]

    RNO-Gcollaboration, B. L. Hendricks et al.,Performance of the Horizontally Polarized Antennas Used in the Radio Neutrino Observatory in Greenland, PoSICRC2023(2023) 1133

    2023

  29. [37]

    ARIANNAcollaboration, S. W. Barwick et al.,Time Domain Response of the ARIANNA Detector, Astropart. Phys.62(2015) 139–151, [1406.0820]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [38]

    ARIANNAcollaboration, S. W. Barwick et al.,Radio detection of air showers with the ARIANNA experiment on the Ross Ice Shelf,Astropart. Phys.90 (2017) 50–68, [1612.04473]

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Oberla et al.,Low-Power Radiofrequency Systems for the RNO-G Project, PoSICRC2023(2023) 1171

    RNO-Gcollaboration, E. Oberla et al.,Low-Power Radiofrequency Systems for the RNO-G Project, PoSICRC2023(2023) 1171

    2023

  32. [40]

    ARIANNAcollaboration, A. Anker et al.,Neutrino vertex reconstruction with in-ice radio detectors using surface reflections and implications for the neutrino energy resolution, JCAP11(2019) 030, [1909.02677]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Allison et al.,Design and performance of an interferometric trigger array for radiodetectionofhigh-energyneutrinos ,Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A 930(2019)112–125,[ 1809.04573]

    ARA collaboration, P. Allison et al.,Design and performance of an interferometric trigger array for radiodetectionofhigh-energyneutrinos ,Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A 930(2019)112–125,[ 1809.04573]

    2019 arXiv

  34. [42]

    J. M. Roberts, E. Oberla, P. Allison, G. S. Varner, S. Spack, B. Fox et al.,LAB4D: A Low Power, Multi-GSa/s, Transient Digitizer with Sampling Timebase Trimming Capabilities,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A925(2019) 92–100, [1803.04600]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Smith,Topics on the detection of ultra-high energy neutrinos

    D. Smith,Topics on the detection of ultra-high energy neutrinos. PhD thesis, University of Chicago,

  36. [44]

    Pyras,Cosmic Rays and the Radio Neutrino Observatory Greenland (RNO-G)

    L. Pyras,Cosmic Rays and the Radio Neutrino Observatory Greenland (RNO-G). PhD thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 2024.10.25593/open-fau-957. – 47 –

    2024 doi

  37. [45]

    Hewlett-Packard,The Zero Bias Schottky Diode Detector at Temperature Extremes – Problems and Solutions, Application Note AN 1090, Hewlett-Packard, 1997

    1997

  38. [46]

    L. Pyras,Optimizing the triggering strategy for the detection of cosmic rays with the Radio Neutrino Observatory Greenland (RNO-G), Master’s thesis, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 2019

    2019

  39. [47]

    G. S. Varner,The modern FPGA as discriminator, TDC and ADC, JINST 1 (2006) P07001, [physics/0605113]

    2006 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Kleinfelder,A 4096 cell switched capacitor analog waveform storage integrated circuit,IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science37(1990) 1230–1236

    S. Kleinfelder,A 4096 cell switched capacitor analog waveform storage integrated circuit,IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science37(1990) 1230–1236

    1990

  41. [49]

    BeagleBoneBlack Industrial

    “BeagleBoneBlack Industrial.” https://www.beagleboard.org/boards/beaglebone-black-industrial

  42. [50]

    Root file format

    “Root file format.”https://root.cern/manual/root_files/

  43. [51]

    Komjathy, J

    A. Komjathy, J. Maslanik, V. Zavorotny, P. Axelrad and S. Katzberg,Sea ice remote sensing using surface reflected GPS signals, inIGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing in Managing...

  44. [52]

    LoRA Alliance, TS001-1.0.4 LoRaWAN®L2 1.0.4 Specification, 2020

    2020

  45. [53]

    Flexcharge NC30L Controller

    “Flexcharge NC30L Controller.” https://www.flexcharge.com/product/flexcharge-nc30l12/

  46. [54]

    Glaser et al.,NuRadioMC: Simulating the radio emission of neutrinos from interaction to detector, Eur

    C. Glaser et al.,NuRadioMC: Simulating the radio emission of neutrinos from interaction to detector, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 77, [1906.01670]

    2020

  47. [55]

    Henrichs et al.,Searching for cosmic-ray air showers with RNO-G, PoS ICRC2023(2023) 259

    RNO-Gcollaboration, J. Henrichs et al.,Searching for cosmic-ray air showers with RNO-G, PoS ICRC2023(2023) 259

    2023

  48. [56]

    J. A. Aguilar et al.,Triboelectric backgrounds to radio-based polar ultra-high energy neutrino (UHEN) experiments,Astropart. Phys.145(2023) 102790

    2023

  49. [57]

    Nelles et al.,Calibrating the absolute amplitude scale for air showers measured at LOFAR, JINST 10 (2015) P11005, [1507.08932]

    A. Nelles et al.,Calibrating the absolute amplitude scale for air showers measured at LOFAR, JINST 10 (2015) P11005, [1507.08932]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    de Almeida et al.,Long-term calibration and stability of the Auger Engineering Radio Array using the diffuse Galactic radio emission,PoSICRC2023(2023) 279

    Pierre Auger collaboration, R. de Almeida et al.,Long-term calibration and stability of the Auger Engineering Radio Array using the diffuse Galactic radio emission,PoSICRC2023(2023) 279

    2023

  51. [59]

    Wang et al.,TAROGE-M: radio antenna array on antarctic high mountain for detecting near-horizontal ultra-high energy air showers, JCAP11(2022) 022, [2207.10616]

    TAROGE, ARIANNAcollaboration, S.-H. Wang et al.,TAROGE-M: radio antenna array on antarctic high mountain for detecting near-horizontal ultra-high energy air showers, JCAP11(2022) 022, [2207.10616]

    2022 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Büsken, T

    M. Büsken, T. Fodran and T. Huege,Uncertainties of the 30-408 MHz Galactic emission as a calibration source for radio detectors in astroparticle physics,Astron. Astrophys.679 (2023) A50, [2211.03086]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Mulrey et al.,Calibration of the LOFAR low-band antennas using the Galaxy and a model of the signal chain,Astropart

    K. Mulrey et al.,Calibration of the LOFAR low-band antennas using the Galaxy and a model of the signal chain,Astropart. Phys.111 (2019) 1–11, [1903.05988]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [62]

    de Almeida, P

    Pierre Auger collaboration, R. de Almeida, P. Abreu, M. Aglietta et al.,Absolute calibration and investigation of ageing of the AERA radio detectors,PoSARENA2022(2023) 039

    2023

  55. [63]

    Mulrey et al.,On the cosmic-ray energy scale of the LOFAR radio telescope,JCAP11 (2020) 017, [2005.13441]

    K. Mulrey et al.,On the cosmic-ray energy scale of the LOFAR radio telescope,JCAP11 (2020) 017, [2005.13441]. – 48 –

    2020 arXiv

  56. [64]

    de Oliveira-Costa, M

    A. de Oliveira-Costa, M. Tegmark, B. M. Gaensler, J. Jonas, T. L. Landecker and P. Reich,A model of diffuse Galactic Radio Emission from 10 MHz to 100 GHz,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.388 (2008) 247, [0802.1525]

    2008 arXiv

  57. [65]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiosonde

  58. [66]

    Southall et al.,Design and initial performance of the prototype for the BEACON instrument for detection of ultrahigh energy particles,Nucl

    D. Southall et al.,Design and initial performance of the prototype for the BEACON instrument for detection of ultrahigh energy particles,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A1048 (2023) 167889, [2206.09660]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Monroe et al.,Self-triggered radio detection and identification of cosmic air showers with the OVRO-LWA,Nucl

    R. Monroe et al.,Self-triggered radio detection and identification of cosmic air showers with the OVRO-LWA,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A953 (2020) 163086, [1907.10193]

    2020 arXiv

  60. [68]

    RNO-Gcollaboration, Z. S. Meyers et al.,Anomaly Detection in Early Data From the Radio Neutrino Observatory Greenland,PoSICRC2023(2023) 1142

    2023

  61. [69]

    Marqué, A

    C. Marqué, A. Martinez Picar, A. Gunessee and J. Magdalenić,e-CALLISTO (HUMAIN). Royal Observatory of Belgium, 2008. 10.24414/nrdh-c565

    2008 doi

  62. [70]

    ,AnnualReviewofAstronomyandAstrophysics 23 (Jan., 1985) 169–224

    G.A.Dulk, Radioemissionfromthesunandstars. ,AnnualReviewofAstronomyandAstrophysics 23 (Jan., 1985) 169–224

    1985

  63. [71]

    B. A. Clark,Optimization of a Search for Ultra-High Energy Neutrinos in Four Years of Data of ARA Station 2. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University, Ohio State U., 2019

    2019

  64. [72]

    Nelles and C

    ARIANNAcollaboration, A. Nelles and C. Persichilli,Measuring Neutrinos with the ARIANNA Hexagonal Radio Array,PoSICRC2015(2016) 1087

    2016

  65. [73]

    Agarwal et al.,Solar flare observations with the Radio Neutrino Observatory Greenland (RNO-G),Astropart

    RNO-Gcollaboration, S. Agarwal et al.,Solar flare observations with the Radio Neutrino Observatory Greenland (RNO-G),Astropart. Phys.164(2025) 103024, [2404.14995]

    2025 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Oeyen et al.,The interplay of ice-firn model and station calibration in RNO-G,PoSICRC2023(2023) 1042

    RNO-Gcollaboration, B. Oeyen et al.,The interplay of ice-firn model and station calibration in RNO-G,PoSICRC2023(2023) 1042

    2023

  67. [75]

    D.A.Meese, A.J.Gow, R.B.Alley, G.A.Zielinski, P.M.Grootes, M.Rametal., TheGreenlandIce Sheet Project 2 depth-age scale: Methods and results, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans102 (1997) 26411–26423

    1997

  68. [76]

    R. L. Hawley, E. M. Morris and J. R. McConnell,Rapid techniques for determining annual accumulation applied at Summit, Greenland,Journal of Glaciology54(2008) 839–845

    2008

  69. [77]

    J. R. Banta and J. R. McConnell,Annual accumulation over recent centuries at four sites in central Greenland, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres112 (2007)

    2007

  70. [78]

    IceCube-Gen2 collaboration, M. G. Aartsen et al.,IceCube-Gen2: the window to the extreme Universe,J. Phys. G48 (2021) 060501, [2008.04323]. – 49 –

    2021

  71. [2022]

    10.6082/uchicago.4742

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.