Localized Electromagnetic Perturbations on Vector Solitons

Eduard Kim; Emin Nugaev; Yakov Shnir; Yulia Galushkina

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Localized Electromagnetic Perturbations on Vector Solitons

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that Proca balls, non-topological solitons of a self-interacting complex vector field, support a localized spherically symmetric vibrational mode whose radial electric field is also localized and oscillates with…

desk verdict A plausible reduced-theory computation of localized perturbations on Proca balls, whose key claim about electromagnetic localization is not yet established in the full Maxwell-Proca system because free-photon homogeneous solutions are silently discarded. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13514 v1 pith:AUVHHNMQ submitted 2024-11-20 hep-ph hep-th

Yulia Galushkina , Eduard Kim , Emin Nugaev , Yakov Shnir This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phhep-th

keywords non-topologicalsolitonProcaballsvibrationalmodeselectromagneticfieldlocalizationgaugekineticcouplingvectorperturbationsQ-ballsVakhitov-Kolokolovcriterion

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a Proca ball, a non-topological soliton built from a self-interacting complex vector field, can carry a localized, oscillating electromagnetic perturbation. The electromagnetic field is not an independent degree of freedom here: the gauge kinetic coupling forces $F_{\mu\nu}=i\gamma W_{\mu\nu}$, so once the vector perturbation is known, the electric field perturbation is determined. Solving the linearized equations for spherically symmetric modes with coupling $\kappa=-0.9$, the authors find a discrete vibration frequency $\lambda(w)$. The mode exists near the cusp at $w_c=0.99918$, spreads out and leaves the discrete spectrum when $\lambda$ crosses $1-w$ at $w=0.9986$, and reappears at $w=0.9942$ inside the kinematically stable region where the soliton energy lies below the free-particle threshold. This matters because localized electromagnetic oscillations on solitons offer a route to confining massless fields in a finite region without invoking extra spatial dimensions.

What carries the argument

The identity $F_{\mu\nu}=i\gamma W_{\mu\nu}$, obtained by integrating out the Maxwell field for configurations with trivial boundary conditions at infinity, is what converts vector-field perturbations into electromagnetic-field perturbations. Its linearized form, Eq. (16), fixes the perturbed electric field in terms of four radial profiles $\chi_1,\chi_2,\phi_1,\phi_2$ that solve the second-order fluctuation equations (18)-(20). The discrete values of $\lambda$ are located numerically by a determinant scan and verified by a shooting method that selects exponentially decaying solutions.

What would settle it

Solve the full linearized Maxwell-Proca system without imposing Eq. (16), allowing a free photon branch; if no exponentially decaying solution with a distinct photon amplitude exists near $\kappa=-0.9$, $w=0.999$, the localized electric mode is an artifact of the integrated-out ansatz. A concrete numerical search for localized solutions of the coupled $F_p$ and $V_p$ equations in that parameter region would settle the question.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For Proca balls with $\kappa=-0.9$, there is a localized spherically symmetric vibrational mode of the vector field with frequency $\lambda(w)$, and this mode produces a localized oscillating radial electric field through Eq. (16). The mode emerges from the cusp where $dQ/dw=0$, delocalizes when $\lambda$ reaches $1-w$ at $w=0.9986$, and revives at $w=0.9942$ in the kinematically stable regime. Both the background and the perturbation radial electric fields decay exponentially at spatial infinity despite being massless fields, and the total electric charge of the configuration remains zero.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the perturbed electromagnetic field is entirely fixed by the vector perturbation through Eq. (16), with no independent free-photon component at the same frequency; if free photon modes were admitted, the claimed localization need not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The discrete frequency $\lambda(w)$ is a genuine part of the Proca-ball spectrum: it starts at the cusp $w_c=0.99918$, merges into the continuum when $\lambda=1-w$ at $w=0.9986$, and reappears at $w=0.9942$.
A soliton in the kinematically stable region, for example at $w=0.9935$, supports a localized oscillating radial electric field that decays exponentially at infinity even though the electric field is massless.
In this P-even model the localized perturbation produces only an electric field, not a magnetic field; a magnetic analogue would require P-odd interaction terms.
Within the effective theory, electromagnetic energy can be stored in a finite shell structure around the soliton, with the perturbation field sharing the exponential localization of the background.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The authors do not analyze the delocalization window $0.9942<w<0.9986$; I would predict that it hosts quasinormal modes, which would connect the discrete branch to the resonant scattering phenomena studied for other solitons.
If the integrated-out relation survives coupling to a radiation bath, the localized mode would acquire a finite width; the revival at $w=0.9942$ gives a concrete frequency window where resonant absorption or emission could be probed in analogue condensed-matter systems.
The same localization mechanism should extend to Proca stars, with gravity replacing the self-interaction potential as the binding agent; in that setting the mode frequency would be tied to the star's compactness rather than to $w$ alone.
A direct test of the paper's central assumption is to include the free photon degrees of freedom that Eq. (3) discards; if a localized mode still exists there, the claim becomes a property of the full Maxwell-Proca system rather than only of the reduced model.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Briefly: this is a workmanlike application of Q-ball perturbation theory to Proca balls with gauge kinetic coupling. The genuinely new result is the λ(w) curve for κ = -0.9: a localized spherically symmetric vector perturbation exists near the cusp, delocalizes when λ hits 1−w, and reappears in the kinematically stable region. The numerics look honest, with two independent methods (shooting and determinant scan) cross-validated near the cusp. I believe the reduced-theory computation is internally consistent.

The soft spot is the one the stress-test flagged, and it is not minor. Equation (16) asserts the EM perturbation is fully determined by the Proca perturbation because background and perturbation fields have trivial boundary conditions. That is not a valid reason. Maxwell's equations are linear: the perturbed F has the general form F^p = iγ W^p + H^p, where H^p is any solution of the sourceless Maxwell equations. Outgoing radiation wave packets satisfy F→0 at infinity, so trivial boundary conditions do nothing to exclude H^p. The authors never check whether the localized mode survives in the full Maxwell-Proca system. If H^p is admitted, the mode can be embedded in the photon continuum and pick up an imaginary part, i.e., become quasi-normal. As written, the paper proves localization only in the constrained EFT, not in the model (1). The authors do acknowledge in Sec. 2 that in a consistent QFT A^μ is truly dynamical, but they do not carry that caveat into the perturbation analysis. That gap should be stated clearly, and the paper would be much stronger if they added a short discussion or toy-model check of whether the "localized mode" is just a quasi-normal resonance.

Other soft spots are proportionally smaller: only one κ is explored; the gap/revival is described but not explained; no code or data are released. The citation pattern is fine; [20] is the same group's background paper, and the method follows [24] and [38], which is acknowledged.

Who is this for? People working on vector solitons, dark matter compact objects, or localized gauge fields on solitons. It is a legitimate extension of known soliton perturbation theory, and the existence of a discrete localized mode in the reduced theory is a publishable observation, but the title and abstract overstate the result because they present it as a property of the full model. A serious referee should engage with it rather than desk-reject, and should ask for the free-photon issue to be addressed, at minimum as an explicit limitation.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies linear spherically symmetric perturbations of Proca balls in a U(1) gauge theory with a gauge kinetic coupling between the Maxwell field and a complex self-interacting Proca field. Using the algebraic relation F_{\mu\nu}=i\gamma W_{\mu\nu} for fields with trivial boundary conditions, the electromagnetic field is integrated out and the authors solve the linearized equations of the reduced self-interacting Proca theory. For the single parameter choice \kappa=-0.9, they find a localized oscillating mode with real frequency \lambda(w) near the cusp w_c=0.99918, observe delocalization when \lambda reaches 1-w at w=0.9986, and find a revival of a localized mode at w=0.9942 in the kinematically stable region. They display the perturbation profiles and the corresponding radial electric field, showing exponential decay at infinity.

Significance. If the relation to the full Maxwell-Proca dynamics is properly stated, the paper provides the first explicit example of a localized electromagnetic perturbation mode on a vector soliton, extending the known vibrational-mode analysis of scalar Q-balls and Proca stars to a theory with a dynamical gauge field. The numerical work is careful: two independent methods (determinant scanning and shooting) are used, accuracy to the fourth significant digit is reported, and the results are validated near the cusp against the expected behavior. The revival branch in the kinematically stable region is a nontrivial and interesting feature. The main limitation is that the electromagnetic perturbation is not solved as an independent dynamical field; it is algebraically derived from the Proca perturbation, so the central claim must be framed as a property of the constrained effective theory unless the homogeneous photon mode is explicitly excluded.

major comments (1)

[Sec. 3, Eq. (16)] The passage from the linearized Maxwell equation to Eq. (16) is not justified as written. Since Eq. (2) is linear in F, the general first-order perturbation has the form F^p_{\mu\nu}=i\gamma W^p_{\mu\nu}+H^p_{\mu\nu}, where \partial_\mu H^{\mu\nu}_p=0. The statement that both background and perturbation fields have trivial boundary conditions at spatial infinity does not eliminate H^p: an outgoing spherical wave with amplitude proportional to 1/r vanishes pointwise at infinity. The subsequent calculation in Eqs. (18)-(23) therefore solves the constrained EFT in which F is algebraically tied to V, not the full model (1) with dynamical photons. This is load-bearing because the paper's title and abstract claim localized electromagnetic perturbations of the full model. The gap is fixable: for exponentially decaying time-harmonic perturbations with real \lambda, no nonzero solution of the free Maxwell equations decays exponentially, so H^p=0 is indeed forced; alternatively, the authors could extend the linearized system to include H^p and check that the mode remains discrete with real \lambda. Either way, the assumption behind Eq. (16) must be stated and justified, or the claim must be explicitly restricted to the constrained EFT.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. 3, Eq. (16)] The displayed equation contains a typo: the first parenthesis should contain \tilde V^{*\nu}_b \tilde V^\mu_p, not \tilde V^{*\nu}_p \tilde V^\mu_p. As printed, the expression contains a second-order product. The later result in Eq. (23) suggests the intended linearization was used, but the displayed equation should be corrected.
[Sec. 3, after Eq. (17)] The text says "\chi_1, \chi_2, \phi_1 and \phi_1"; the last symbol should be \phi_2.
[Fig. 2 caption] The caption says "with a minimum at w_c"; this is imprecise because w_c is the point where dQ/dw=0, and the function Q(w) has a stationary point there. Please clarify whether it is a minimum or a generic cusp point.
[Appendix B, Eq. (B.2)] The expressions for A_\pm and B_\pm contain an extra comma and an unbalanced bracket in the displayed formula; the asymptotic boundary conditions should be typeset cleanly.
[Sec. 4] The phrase "discontinuous spectrum" is unclear; the data show two separated branches of \lambda(w), so it would be more precise to say the discrete spectrum has a gap or that the mode disappears over an intermediate interval of w.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the vector-mode frequency is found by solving a linearized eigenvalue problem, not fitted; the EM profile is a model-imposed consequence of Eq. (3), and the cited background work is independently reproduced.

full rationale

The central result is the existence of a localized spherically symmetric perturbation of the Proca field with eigenfrequency λ(w), obtained by solving the linearized equations (18)-(20) with the shooting/determinant methods of Appendix B. λ is not fitted to the target electric field; it is an eigenvalue of the fluctuation operator. The claim that this mode produces a localized electric field is a direct consequence of Eq. (3), which the paper explicitly derives from the Maxwell equation (2) for configurations with trivial boundary conditions, and the paper does not hide that Eq. (16) makes the EM perturbation a function of the vector perturbation. This is a model relation, not a circular fit. The only self-citations ([20] for Proca-ball backgrounds, [24] for the scalar Q-ball expansion near the cusp) are used for background profiles and as numerical validation; the background is recomputed here with a 4th-order Runge-Kutta method and the scalar result is an independently published calculation, so the citations are not load-bearing circularity. The limitation flagged by the skeptic — that a homogeneous free-photon solution of the linearized Maxwell equation is dropped when passing from (2) to (16) — is a physical/consistency assumption of the classical EFT treatment (the paper itself notes in Sec. 2 that in a consistent QFT Aμ must be quantized as dynamical), but it is not circularity: it does not make the eigenvalue calculation equivalent to its inputs. Thus no step in the claimed derivation reduces by construction to a fit or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the integrated-out relation between F and W, the specific potential (4), the restriction to spherically symmetric ansatze, and the numerical boundary conditions. No new particles or forces are introduced; kappa and w are model/solution parameters.

free parameters (1)

kappa = -0.9
The only dimensionless parameter of the reduced model; the paper fixes kappa = -0.9 (Sec. 2) because it produces thin-wall solitons. Results are not shown for other values, limiting generality.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The effective field theory (1) with quartic potential (4) is a valid description; higher-order EFT terms are negligible in the non-relativistic limit.
Invoked in Sec. 2 to justify ignoring ambiguities in Proca self-interactions and UV completion.
domain assumption Electromagnetic field is integrated out via F_mu nu = i gamma W_mu nu (Eq. 3), assuming trivial boundary conditions at spatial infinity for both background and perturbations.
Central for the reduced Lagrangian (5) and perturbation relation (16); stated in Sec. 2.
ad hoc to paper The linear perturbation ansatz (17) includes only two harmonics e^{+-i lambda tau} and spherically symmetric profiles; other angular dependencies and higher harmonics are ignored.
Restricts the spectrum; the paper acknowledges non-spherical ground states in Proca stars (Sec. 4) but does not study non-spherical perturbations.
standard math Numerical shooting assumes exponentially decaying solutions at infinity and uses asymptotic boundary conditions (B.1); this defines the discrete spectrum being searched for.
Standard for bound-state eigenvalue problems; described in Appendix B.
standard math Vakhitov-Kolokolov criterion (dQ/dw < 0) is used to identify linear instability, borrowed from scalar Q-ball analysis.
Invoked in Sec. 2 to locate the cusp and stable branches.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Localized Electromagnetic Perturbations on Vector Solitons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AUVHHNMQ

@misc{pith2026241113514,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Localized Electromagnetic Perturbations on Vector Solitons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AUVHHNMQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13514}
}

read the original abstract

Using effective field theory approach one can describe localization of electromagnetic field on a non-topological soliton. Pursuing this aim we consider the U(1) gauge theory with gauge kinetic coupling to a self-interacting complex neutral Proca field. The model possesses single energy scale given by the vector boson mass. Considering spherically symmetric stationary configurations, we study vibrational modes of the Proca field on the background of the soliton and discuss their properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13514 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Integral characteristic (E/M − Q) plotted versus Q for vector solitons (9) in the theory (5) with α˜ = 1 and κ = β/˜ α˜ = −0.9. Marked values of w: wmin ≈ 0.99, ws = 0.99806, wc = 0.99918. The upper branch of solitons is partially calculated on the obtained numerical solutions and partially with the formulae of non-relativistic scaling of E and Q (see [14]). the electric field. This is the property of the model whic… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** a) Oscillation parameter λ as a function of w for spherically symmetric perturbations (17) in the theory (5) with α˜ = 1 and κ = β/˜ α˜ = −0.9. The point of the cusp, where dQ/dw = 0, is at wc = 0.99918. b) Q as a function of w, with a minimum at wc. At w = 0.9942 localized state revives back into the discrete spectrum, see the left side of Fig.2. In the contrast to the modes near the cusp, these localized states l… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** a) Background vector field profile (9) at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

[20]

Galushkina, E

Y. Galushkina, E. Nugaev, A. Shkerin, Nontopological electro- magnetic hedgehogs, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01335 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[24]

Kovtun, E

A. Kovtun, E. Nugaev, A. Shkerin, Vibrational modes of Q- balls, Phys. Rev. D 98 (9) (2018) 096016.arXiv:1805.03518, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.096016

arXiv 2018
[38]

N. M. Santos, C. L. Benone, C. A. R. Herdeiro, Radial stability of spherical bosonic stars and critical points, JCAP 06 (2024)

work page 2024
[1]

N. S. Manton, P. Sutcliffe, Topological solitons, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2004. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617034

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617034 2004
[2]

Y. M. Shnir, Topological and Non-Topological Solitons in Scalar Field Theories, Cambridge University Press, 2018

work page 2018
[3]

Bishop, J

A. Bishop, J. Krumhansl, S. Trullinger, Solitons in condensed matter: A paradigm, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 1 (1) (1980) 1–44

work page 1980
[4]

E. J. Weinberg, Classical solutions in quantum field theory: Solitons and Instantons in High Energy Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2012

work page 2012
[5]

Shifman, A

M. Shifman, A. Yung, Supersymmetric solitons, Cambridge University Press, 2009

work page 2009

Show all 51 references

[6]

T. W. Kibble, Some implications of a cosmological phase tran- sition, Physics Reports 67 (1) (1980) 183–199

1980
[7]

Vilenkin, E

A. Vilenkin, E. Shellard, Cosmic strings and other topological defects, Cambridge University Press, 1994

1994
[8]

Rosen, Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theorieswith Positive-Definite Energy Densities, J

G. Rosen, Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theorieswith Positive-Definite Energy Densities, J. Math. Phys. 9 (1968) 996.doi:10.1063/1.1664693

1968 doi
[9]

Friedberg, T

R. Friedberg, T. D. Lee, A. Sirlin, A Class of Scalar-Field Soli- ton Solutions in Three Space Dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 2739–2761. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.2739

1976 doi
[10]

S. R. Coleman, Q-balls, Nucl. Phys. B 262 (2) (1985) 263, [Addendum: Nucl.Phys.B 269, 744 (1986)]. doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(86)90520-1

1985
[11]

E. Radu, M. S. Volkov, Existence of stationary, non-radiating ring solitons in field theory: knots and vortons, Phys. Rept. 468 (2008) 101–151. arXiv:0804.1357, doi:10.1016/j.physrep. 2008.07.002

2008 arXiv
[12]

V. A. Rubakov, Large and infinite extra dimensions: An Intro- duction, Phys. Usp. 44 (2001) 871–893.arXiv:hep-ph/0104152, doi:10.1070/PU2001v044n09ABEH001000

2001 arXiv
[13]

G. R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, M. A. Shifman, (Quasi)localized gauge field on a brane: Dissipating cosmic radiation to extra dimensions?, Phys. Lett. B 497 (2001) 271–280.arXiv:hep-th/ 0010071, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01329-0

2001 doi
[14]

A. Y. Loginov, Nontopological solitons in the model of the self- interacting complex vector field, Phys. Rev. D 91 (10) (2015) 105028. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.105028

2015 doi
[15]

Zhang, M

H.-Y. Zhang, M. Jain, M. A. Amin, Polarized vector oscillons, Phys. Rev. D 105 (9) (2022) 096037.arXiv:2111.08700, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.096037

2022 arXiv
[16]

Clough, T

K. Clough, T. Helfer, H. Witek, E. Berti, Ghost Instabilities in Self-Interacting Vector Fields: The Problem with Proca Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (15) (2022) 151102. arXiv:2204.10868, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.151102

2022 arXiv
[17]

Gorghetto, E

M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, J. March-Russell, N. Song, S. M. West, Dark photon stars: formation and role as dark matter substruc- ture, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2022 (08) (2022) 018. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/018. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/...

2022 doi
[18]

L. B. Okun, LIMITS OF ELECTRODYNAMICS: PARAPHO- TONS?, Sov. Phys. JETP 56 (1982) 502

1982
[19]

Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys

B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys. Lett. B 166 (1986) 196–198.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91377-8

1986 doi
[21]

Brito, V

R. Brito, V. Cardoso, C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, Proca stars: Gravitating Bose–Einstein condensates of massive spin 1 par- ticles, Phys. Lett. B 752 (2016) 291–295. arXiv:1508.05395, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.051

2016 arXiv
[22]

D. L. T. Anderson, G. H. Derrick, Stability of Time-Dependent Particlelike Solutions in Nonlinear Field Theories. I, Journal of Mathematical Physics 11 (4) (1970) 1336–1346.doi:10.1063/ 1.1665265

1970
[23]

M. N. Smolyakov, Perturbations against a Q-ball: Charge, energy, and additivity property, Phys. Rev. D 97 (4) (2018) 045011. arXiv:1711.05730, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.045011

2018 arXiv
[25]

Dorey, A

P. Dorey, A. Gorina, I. Perapechka, T. Roma´ nczukiewicz, Y. Shnir, Resonance structures in kink-antikink collisions in a deformed sine-Gordon model, JHEP 09 (2021) 145. arXiv: 2106.09560, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2021)145

2021 arXiv
[26]

R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 (2011) 793–836. arXiv:1102.4014, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys. 83.793

2011 arXiv
[27]

E. S. C. Ching, P. T. Leung, A. Maassen van den Brink, W. M. Suen, S. S. Tong, K. Young, Quasinormal-mode expansion for waves in open systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 (1998) 1545.arXiv: gr-qc/9904017, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.70.1545

1998 arXiv
[28]

Forgacs, M

P. Forgacs, M. S. Volkov, Resonant excitations of the ’t Hooft- Polyakov monopole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 151802.arXiv: hep-th/0311062, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.151802

2004 arXiv
[29]

Bizon, T

P. Bizon, T. Chmaj, A. Rostworowski, On asymptotic stabil- ity of the Skyrmion, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 121702.arXiv: math-ph/0701037, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.121702

2007 arXiv
[30]

D. K. Campbell, J. F. Schonfeld, C. A. Wingate, Resonance structure in kink-antikink interactions inφ 4 theory , Physica D 9 (1983) 1.doi:10.1016/0167-2789(83)90289-0

1983 doi
[31]

Anninos, S

P. Anninos, S. Oliveira, R. A. Matzner, Fractal structure in the scalar lambda (phi**2-1)**2 theory, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 1147–1160. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.1147

1991 doi
[32]

Dorey, A

P. Dorey, A. Halavanau, J. Mercer, T. Romanczukiewicz, Y. Shnir, Boundary scattering in theϕ4 model, JHEP 05 (2017)

2017
[33]

Romanczukiewicz, Interaction between kink and radiation in phi**4 model, Acta Phys

T. Romanczukiewicz, Interaction between kink and radiation in phi**4 model, Acta Phys. Polon. B 35 (2004) 523–540.arXiv: hep-th/0303058

2004 arXiv
[34]

Forgacs, A

P. Forgacs, A. Lukacs, T. Romanczukiewicz, Negative radia- tion pressure exerted on kinks, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 125012. 7 arXiv:0802.0080, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.125012

2008 arXiv
[35]

C. Adam, K. Oles, T. Romanczukiewicz, A. Wereszczynski, Spectral Walls in Soliton Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (24) (2019) 241601. arXiv:1903.12100, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 122.241601

2019 arXiv
[36]

Dorey, T

P. Dorey, T. Roma´ nczukiewicz, Resonant kink-antikink scat- tering through quasinormal modes, Phys. Lett. B 779 (2018) 117–123. arXiv:1712.10235, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018. 02.003

2018 arXiv
[37]

C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, N. Sanchis-Gual, N. M. Santos, E. dos Santos Costa Filho, The non-spherical ground state of Proca stars, Phys. Lett. B 852 (2024) 138595. arXiv:2311. 14800, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138595

2024
[39]

Alonso-Izquierdo, D

A. Alonso-Izquierdo, D. Miguelez-Caballero, Dissecting normal modes of vibration on vortices in ginzburg-landau superconduc- tors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08705 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[40]

M. P. Kinach, M. W. Choptuik, Dynamics of u (1) gauged q- balls in three spatial dimensions, Physical Review D 110 (7) (2024) 075033

2024
[41]

A. G. Panin, M. N. Smolyakov, Problem with classical stability of U(1) gauged Q-balls, Phys. Rev. D 95 (6) (2017) 065006. arXiv:1612.00737, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.065006

2017 arXiv
[42]

Pauli, Relativistic Field Theories of Elementary Particles, Rev

W. Pauli, Relativistic Field Theories of Elementary Particles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 13 (1941) 203–232.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys. 13.203

1941 doi
[43]

Pargellis, N

A. Pargellis, N. Turok, B. Yurke, Monopole-antimonopole an- nihilation in a nematic liquid crystal, Physical review letters 67 (12) (1991) 1570

1991
[44]

Lahaye, C

T. Lahaye, C. Menotti, L. Santos, M. Lewenstein, T. Pfau, The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases, Rept. Prog. Phys. 72 (12) (2009) 126401.doi:10.1088/0034-4885/72/12/126401

2009 doi
[45]

Herdeiro, E

C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, E. dos Santos Costa Filho, Proca- Higgs balls and stars in a UV completion for Proca self- interactions, JCAP 05 (2023) 022. arXiv:2301.04172, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/05/022

2023 arXiv
[46]

Mou, H.-Y

Z.-G. Mou, H.-Y. Zhang, Singularity Problem for Interact- ing Massive Vectors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (15) (2022) 151101. arXiv:2204.11324, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.151101

2022 arXiv
[47]

Arodz, J

H. Arodz, J. Lis, Compact Q-balls and Q-shells in a scalar elec- trodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 045002.arXiv:0812.3284, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.045002

2009 arXiv
[48]

Heeck, A

J. Heeck, A. Rajaraman, R. Riley, C. B. Verhaaren, Proca Q- balls and Q-shells, JHEP 10 (2021) 103. arXiv:2107.10280, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)103

2021 arXiv
[49]

Levkov, E

D. Levkov, E. Nugaev, A. Popescu, The fate of small classically stable Q-balls, JHEP 12 (2017) 131. arXiv:1711.05279, doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2017)131. 8

2017 arXiv
[68]

arXiv:2404.07257, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/06/068

2024 arXiv
[107]

arXiv:1508.02329, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)107

2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [20]

Galushkina, E

Y. Galushkina, E. Nugaev, A. Shkerin, Nontopological electro- magnetic hedgehogs, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01335 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024

[2] [24]

Kovtun, E

A. Kovtun, E. Nugaev, A. Shkerin, Vibrational modes of Q- balls, Phys. Rev. D 98 (9) (2018) 096016.arXiv:1805.03518, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.096016

arXiv 2018

[3] [38]

N. M. Santos, C. L. Benone, C. A. R. Herdeiro, Radial stability of spherical bosonic stars and critical points, JCAP 06 (2024)

work page 2024

[4] [1]

N. S. Manton, P. Sutcliffe, Topological solitons, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2004. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617034

doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617034 2004

[5] [2]

Y. M. Shnir, Topological and Non-Topological Solitons in Scalar Field Theories, Cambridge University Press, 2018

work page 2018

[6] [3]

Bishop, J

A. Bishop, J. Krumhansl, S. Trullinger, Solitons in condensed matter: A paradigm, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 1 (1) (1980) 1–44

work page 1980

[7] [4]

E. J. Weinberg, Classical solutions in quantum field theory: Solitons and Instantons in High Energy Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2012

work page 2012

[8] [5]

Shifman, A

M. Shifman, A. Yung, Supersymmetric solitons, Cambridge University Press, 2009

work page 2009