Dynamical friction can flip the hierarchical three-body system

Li Hu; Rong-Gen Cai; Shao-Jiang Wang

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Dynamical friction can flip the hierarchical three-body system

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dynamical friction from a dark matter spike can restore orbital flips that Brown's Hamiltonian suppresses.

desk verdict Novel mechanism with a real technical contribution, but the DF force law and constant-density approximation are used in regimes they don't cover, so the flip claim is plausible, not yet secure. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14047 v3 pith:HLM4FDIU submitted 2024-11-21 gr-qc

Li Hu , Rong-Gen Cai , Shao-Jiang Wang This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qc

keywords hierarchicaltriplesystemsdynamicalfrictiondarkmatterspikeorbitalflipBrown'sHamiltonianvonZeipel–Kozai–Lidovmechanismoctupolesecularequationsgravitational-waveprobe

topics Dark Matter

open problems Dark Matter

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that dynamical friction from a dark matter spike can rescue orbital flips in hierarchical triple systems, restoring a phenomenon that the nonlinear Brown's Hamiltonian term suppresses when the third body is very massive. The authors derive secular evolution equations up to octupole order without eliminating ascending nodes, then add Chandrasekhar dynamical friction from a power-law dark matter spike around the central black hole. Their numerical examples show that flips which disappear when Brown's term is included reappear once friction is added, and that the number of flips grows with the spike index and with larger inner and outer semi-major axes at fixed ratio. If the mechanism is right, an observed flip in a system that should not flip under gravity alone becomes a probe of dark matter around supermassive black holes.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing pieces are three: Brown's Hamiltonian $H_B$, which captures the second-order quadrupole nonlinearity that suppresses flips at large $m_3$; the Chandrasekhar dynamical friction formula $\mathbf{F}_{\rm DF}^{\eta} = -C_{\rm DF} m_\eta^2 \tilde{\mathbf{v}}_\eta / \tilde{v}_\eta^3$ with $C_{\rm DF} = 4\pi G^2 \rho_{\rm DM} \lambda$, acting on both inner bodies; and the power-law dark matter spike $\rho_{\rm spike}(R) = \rho_{\rm sp} (R_{\rm sp}/R)^{\gamma_{\rm sp}}$. The friction term is what does the recovering work: it pumps the inner eccentricity to values near unity, and the paper notes that flips only occur at extreme eccentricity, so the friction re-opens the flip channel that Brown's Hamiltonian closes. The octupole equations of motion without node elimination, derived in Appendix B, provide the framework in which both new effects can be included consistently.

What would settle it

Set up case A of Table 1 ($m_3 = 15630 M_\odot$, $a_2 = 10$ au, $\rho_{\rm DM} = 1.35 \times 10^{-4} M_\odot/{\rm au}^3$) and integrate the full equations: if the inclination fails to cross $90^\circ$ within 120 years while the paper's red curve flips, the central claim is wrong. Observationally, a binary pulsar orbiting a supermassive black hole inside a putative spike should show the predicted flip episodes and associated near-unity eccentricity; the absence of such flips in a system with well-determined masses and orbit would rule out the assumed spike density.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the suppression of orbital flip caused by Brown's Hamiltonian can be overcome by the dynamical friction of a dark matter spike acting on the inner binary. In its own words, the suppressed occurrences of orbital flip could be recovered. For systems with $m_3$ much larger than $m_1+m_2$, the Brown term keeps the inner inclination below the flip threshold; adding Chandrasekhar friction from a spike with slope $\gamma_{\rm sp}$ between $5/3$ and $2.4$ drives the eccentricity toward unity and lets the inclination cross $90^\circ$, with the flip count increasing for steeper spikes. The paper also presents, for the first time, the octupole equations of motion without eliminating ascending nodes, a step required because both the Brown term and dynamical friction break the constancy of the node difference.

Load-bearing premise

The dark matter spike survives the inner binary's dynamical friction with the assumed power-law density and normalization; if the spike is depleted or much less dense than the adopted scaling relations imply, the friction force becomes too weak to restore the flips shown.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A hierarchical triple that is predicted not to flip under pure gravity, but is observed to flip, can be read as evidence for a dense dark matter spike around the central black hole.
Steeper dark matter spikes produce more flips per unit time: the paper shows the flip count rising from one to four as $\gamma_{\rm sp}$ goes from $2$ to $2.4$.
At fixed $a_1/a_2$, larger semi-major axes produce more flips within the same number of outer orbital periods, because the longer outer period lets dynamical friction accumulate longer even though the ambient density is lower.
Flips are accompanied by extreme inner eccentricities, which means the recovered flips would also show up as strong and characteristic gravitational-wave emission from the inner binary.
The octupole equations without eliminating ascending nodes make the formalism available for other perturbations that break the $h_1 - h_2$ symmetry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If real spikes are eroded by the very binary motion they are meant to act on, the recovered flips weaken or vanish; this makes the flip-count a potential lower bound on spike density rather than a yes/no dark-matter detector.
The same eccentricity-pumping argument should apply to other dissipative forces, such as gas drag or dynamical friction from a stellar cusp, so the flip-recovery mechanism may be broader than dark matter.
A null search: a survey of massive hierarchical triples with well-measured orbits that should flip under the paper's model, but do not, would constrain the spike density and slope $\gamma_{\rm sp}$ more tightly than any single system.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First read: the new physical ingredient is real—Chandrasekhar dynamical friction from a DM spike added to the secular equations of a hierarchical triple—and the paper is honest that the numbered runs are illustrative examples of principle. The derivation of octupole-order EOMs without eliminating ascending nodes is a useful technical contribution, and the treatment of Brown's Hamiltonian follows the literature correctly. The citation pattern is sound; the main claim is not anticipated in prior work. The main result, that dynamical friction can recover flips suppressed by Brown's Hamiltonian, is a natural one to test, and the paper shows several cases where it works.

Now the soft spots, and they sit inside the force that produces the flips. Equation (2.29) uses Chandrasekhar's formula in the high-velocity limit, dropping the [erf(X) - (2X/√π)exp(-X^2)] factor. In the paper's own cases the center-of-mass speed is comparable to the local velocity dispersion, so X is O(1), not large. At X=1 the omitted factor is roughly 0.43; at X=0.5 it is roughly 0.08, and the low-velocity limit is linear in v, not v/|v|^3. The magnitude and velocity dependence of the friction that rescues the flips are therefore not established. Second, Sec. 2.3 replaces ρ_spike(R) by ρ_spike(a2), justified for 'slightly off-circular' outer orbits, but all Table 1 cases use e2 = 0.6 or 0.45. Over an outer orbit, ρ varies by (1.6/0.4)^γ, a factor between 10 and 40 for the γ values used. That is an order-of-magnitude change in the drag force. Both approximations need to be validated before the qualitative conclusion is secure.

The paper also provides no code, data, or convergence tests, and the argument that an isothermal SIDM core keeps the spike intact is borrowed from a paper about a different setting. Those are real limitations, not fatal ones. The paper itself acknowledges the parameter space is large and frames the runs as illustrative.

Who is this for: people working on secular triples and DM spikes. It is a plausible mechanism that deserves follow-up, and the analytic EOMs are checkable. Assign a serious referee; the paper is original and worth a careful major-revision cycle. My recommendation: send to peer review, not desk reject.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the secular dynamics of a hierarchical triple system with a massive central body, adding the Brown Hamiltonian term that suppresses orbital flips and, as the authors state for the first time, a Chandrasekhar dynamical-friction force from a power-law dark-matter spike around the central body. The paper derives doubly averaged octupole evolution equations without eliminating ascending nodes (Appendix B), adds the Brown term and a constant-density dynamical-friction force (Eq. 2.29), and integrates a set of illustrative cases in Table 1. The central finding is that dynamical friction can restore flips that Brown's Hamiltonian suppresses, that the number of flips increases with the spike index and with the overall semi-major axis scale at fixed a1/a2, and that such flips could serve as a probe of dark matter through electromagnetic or gravitational-wave observations.

Significance. If the quantitative results survive scrutiny, the paper identifies a genuinely new dissipative channel in hierarchical triples and a potentially observable dark-matter signature. Its strengths are the clear presentation of the averaged equations, the explicit enumeration of parameter choices and acknowledged limitations (the illustrative character of the examples and the cost of a full parameter search), and the falsifiable predictions about flip counts versus spike index and semi-major axis. However, the central quantitative claim currently rests on two unchecked approximations in the dynamical-friction force law and on an assumed survival of the dark-matter spike; for those reasons the contribution is promising but its present evidence is not yet conclusive.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 2.3, Eq. (2.29); Table 1] The Chandrasekhar formula is applied in the high-velocity limit, with the dimensionless factor [erf(X) - 2X/sqrt(pi) exp(-X^2)] set to unity and the Coulomb logarithm fixed to lambda = 10. For the parameters in Table 1, the relative speed |v_tilde| is of the same order as the local velocity dispersion sigma of the spike: in case A, |v_tilde| ~ 10^3 km/s while sigma ~ 6 x 10^2 km/s, so X = |v_tilde|/(sqrt(2) sigma) is O(1), in which regime the omitted factor is substantially less than unity and the drag has a different velocity dependence. Since the recovered flips in Figs. 2-5 are produced entirely by this force, the quantitative claim requires either implementing the full Chandrasekhar expression or demonstrating that the high-velocity limit is valid for every configuration that flips.
[Sec. 2.3, paragraph on 'slightly off-circular'; Table 1] The substitution rho_spike(R) = rho_spike(a2) is justified by an outer orbit that is 'slightly off-circular', but every entry in Table 1 has e2 = 0.6 (cases A-E) or e2 = 0.45 (cases F-J). For e2 = 0.6 the orbital radius varies between 0.4 a2 and 1.6 a2, so the density rho proportional to R^{-gamma} changes by a factor 4^gamma, i.e., about 25 for gamma = 7/3. The constant value rho(a2) is not the time average over the Kepler orbit and directly rescales C_DF in Eq. (2.29). The paper should evaluate rho at the instantaneous R during the integration or use the properly orbit-averaged density, and it should reconcile the stated 'slightly off-circular' condition with the adopted eccentricities.
[Sec. 2.3 and Sec. 4] The survival of the dark-matter spike under the backreaction of dynamical friction is assumed on the basis of Ref. [20], but no timescale estimate is given for the parameters used in this paper. The energy deposited by the drag on m1 and m2 over the integration time should be compared with the binding energy of the spike material within the outer orbit; if the spike is depleted on a timescale shorter than the flip time, the central claim would not apply to realistic systems. Please provide a quantitative estimate or an explicit timescale argument, or clearly state the regime in which the assumption holds.

minor comments (4)

[Sec. 2.3, Eq. (2.29)] The same symbol R denotes both the orbital radius (as in rho_spike(R)) and the rotation matrix in v_tilde_eta = v_eta + R^{-1}V; please use distinct symbols to avoid confusion.
[Eq. (2.21) and Appendix B] All parameter sets in Table 1 have i2 = 0, for which the dh2/dt equation (2.21) and the octupole counterparts in Appendix B contain csc(i2) singularities; the paper should state how the numerical integration handles this coordinate singularity (for example, by fixing h2 = 0 and dropping the equation).
[Appendix A heading] The heading of Appendix A reads 'DM sipke parameters'; this should be 'spike'.
[Table 1 and Appendix A] Please include the intermediate spike parameters rho_sp and R_sp (computed in Appendix A) in or near Table 1, so that the quoted values of rho_DM can be reproduced from the empirical scaling relations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: dynamical friction is an additional physical force, and the reported flips are emergent outputs of the numerically integrated secular equations, not restatements of the inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — that adding Chandrasekhar dynamical friction from a dark-matter spike to the quadrupole+octupole+Brown Hamiltonian can recover orbital flips — is an emergent output of a numerically integrated ODE system, not a restatement of its inputs. The drag force in Eq. (2.29) uses the standard Chandrasekhar form with CDF = 4πG²ρDMλ; ρDM, γsp, λ, and the orbital parameters are chosen inputs scanned by hand, and none is fitted to reproduce flip events. The flip statistic (sign change of inner angular momentum) is computed from the evolved orbital elements, so there is no self-definitional reduction. The only self-citation is Ref. [19] (the authors' own prior work), and it is used as a supporting reference for an observational perspective on eccentric SMBH inspirals with DM spikes, not as the proof of the present flip-recovery result; the same motivation is independently supported by Ref. [18]. The paper explicitly labels its parameter choices as illustrative and notes the computational cost of a full parameter-space investigation, which is an honest limitation rather than a hidden circular step. The skeptical concerns about the high-velocity limit of Chandrasekhar's formula, the fixed Coulomb logarithm λ=10, and the replacement of ρ_spike(R) by ρ_spike(a2) for e2=0.6 are about the validity of physical approximations in the regime studied; they do not make the derivation circular, because the drag law is imported from outside the flip statistic rather than constructed to reproduce it. Accordingly, the circularity score is low: one minor, non-load-bearing self-citation but no reduction of the central claim to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on a standard secular three-body framework plus two environmental ingredients: a power-law dark matter spike and Chandrasekhar dynamical friction. The spike profile, its survival, and the constant Coulomb logarithm are the main inputs; the flip is an emergent output, so nothing in the ledger is fitted to the claimed phenomenon.

free parameters (2)

Coulomb logarithm lambda = 10
Chosen by hand in Sec 2.3 (after Eq 2.29); scales the amplitude of the dynamical friction force linearly. Standard values in the literature range from 3 to 10.
Spike index gamma_sp = 5/3, 2, 7/3, 2.4 in cases F-I; 7/3 and 5/3 in other cases
Treated as a free parameter in the range 0 to 3 (Sec 2.3) and scanned to show that the flip count increases with gamma_sp. The value changes the dark matter density at a given radius through Eq (2.28).

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The DM spike density follows the power-law profile rho_spike(R) = rho_sp (R_sp/R)^gamma_sp for R_ISCO < R < R_sp (Eq 2.28).
Invoked in Sec 2.3 to define the environment; the profile is taken from the adiabatic growth model of Gondolo and Silk [25], with normalization from empirical scaling relations in Appendix A.
domain assumption The dynamical friction force on bodies m1 and m2 is given by Chandrasekhar's formula (Eq 2.29) with constant lambda = 10.
Used in Sec 2.3 to add the drag; the formula is standard but approximate for a power-law medium and ignores the self-gravity of the wake.
domain assumption The DM spike survives the dynamical friction of the inner binary.
Sec 2.3 cites Ref [20] for self-interacting dark matter storing the energy in the halo core; if the spike is depleted, the entire dynamical-friction mechanism disappears.
standard math The doubly averaged (secular) approximation is valid for the long-term evolution, including for the dynamical-friction contribution.
The conservative EOMs are derived from the doubly averaged Hamiltonian, and the dynamical-friction terms are double averaged numerically in Sec 2.3; the paper does not assess the breakdown of this approximation for strong dynamical friction.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamical friction can flip the hierarchical three-body system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HLM4FDIU

@misc{pith2026241114047,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamical friction can flip the hierarchical three-body system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HLM4FDIU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14047}
}

read the original abstract

In recent years, the long-term effects of non-linear perturbations were found to be important for the evolution of the hierarchical triple system, which, for the central third body of a larger mass, can significantly suppress the occurrences of orbital flip that changes the sign of angular momentum of inner binary. However, as the third-body mass increases significantly, the ambient dark matter spike becomes much more dense, rendering the effect of dynamical friction non-negligible. In this work, we take the dynamical friction into account for the first time in the hierarchical triple system up to the octupole order and find that the suppressed occurrences of orbital flip could be recovered, and as the spike index increases, the number of flips could increase over a period of time; meanwhile, as both the inner and outer semi-major axes increase while keeping their ratio fixed, the number of flips could also increase over the same number of outer orbital periods, making the detection of orbital flip a potential probe of the dark matter via observations of either electromagnetic waves or gravitational waves.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Observable signature of magnetic tidal coupling in hierarchical triple systems
gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Magnetic tidal fields from a supermassive black hole trigger new orbital resonances in a companion compact binary, boosting eccentricity and altering its gravitational-wave signal.
Thermodynamics of Kerr-Bertotti-Robinson black hole
gr-qc 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A consistent thermodynamics of the Kerr-Bertotti-Robinson black hole is constructed by adopting the Christodoulou-Ruffini mass relation, yielding a first law and Smarr formula without an explicit magnetic-field work term.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[20]

Alonso- ´Alvarez, J.M

G. Alonso- ´Alvarez, J.M. Cline and C. Dewar, Self-Interacting Dark Matter Solves the Final Parsec Problem of Supermassive Black Hole Mergers , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 021401 [2401.14450]

arXiv 2024
[1]

Kozai, Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity , Astron

Y. Kozai, Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity , Astron. J. 67 (1962) 591

work page 1962
[2]

Lidov, The evolution of orbits of artificial satellites of planets under the action of gravitational perturbations of external bodies , Planet

M.L. Lidov, The evolution of orbits of artificial satellites of planets under the action of gravitational perturbations of external bodies , Planet. Space Sci. 9 (1962) 719

work page 1962
[3]

Zeipel, Sur l’application des s´ eries de m

H.V. Zeipel, Sur l’application des s´ eries de m. lindstedt ` a l’´ etude du mouvement des com` etes p´ eriodiques, Astronomische Nachrichten 183 (1909) 345 [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/asna.19091832202]

doi:10.1002/asna.19091832202 1909
[4]

Naoz, W.M

S. Naoz, W.M. Farr, Y. Lithwick, F.A. Rasio and J. Teyssandier, Hot Jupiters from Secular Planet–Planet Interactions, Nature 473 (2011) 187 [ 1011.2501]

arXiv 2011
[5]

Will, Orbital flips in hierarchical triple systems: relativistic effects and third-body effects to hexadecapole order, Phys

C.M. Will, Orbital flips in hierarchical triple systems: relativistic effects and third-body effects to hexadecapole order, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 023017 [ 1705.03962]

arXiv 2017
[6]

Hamers and S.F

A.S. Hamers and S.F. Portegies Zwart, Secular dynamics of hierarchical multiple systems composed of nested binaries, with an arbitrary number of bodies and arbitrary hierarchical structure. First applications to multiplanet and multistar systems , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 459 (2016) 2827 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf...

work page 2016
[7]

Randall and Z.-Z

L. Randall and Z.-Z. Xianyu, An Analytical Portrait of Binary Mergers in Hierarchical Triple Systems, Astrophys. J. 864 (2018) 134 [ 1802.05718]. – 25 –

arXiv 2018

Show all 36 references

[8]

S. Naoz, B. Kocsis, A. Loeb and N. Yunes, Resonant Post-Newtonian Eccentricity Excitation in Hierarchical Three-body Systems, Astrophys. J. 773 (2013) 187 [ 1206.4316]

2013 arXiv
[9]

Fang and Q.-G

Y. Fang and Q.-G. Huang, Secular evolution of compact binaries revolving around a spinning massive black hole , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 103005 [ 1901.05591]

2019 arXiv
[10]

Naoz, The eccentric kozai-lidov effect and its applications , Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 54 (2016) 441

S. Naoz, The eccentric kozai-lidov effect and its applications , Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 54 (2016) 441

2016
[11]

L. Luo, B. Katz and S. Dong, Double-averaging can fail to characterize the long-term evolution of Lidov–Kozai Cycles and derivation of an analytical correction , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 458 (2016) 3060 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/458/3...

2016
[12]

H. Lei, C. Circi and E. Ortore, Modified double-averaged Hamiltonian in hierarchical triple systems, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (2018) 4602 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/481/4/4602/25944642/sty2619.pdf]

2018
[13]

Will, Higher-order effects in the dynamics of hierarchical triple systems

C.M. Will, Higher-order effects in the dynamics of hierarchical triple systems. Quadrupole-squared terms, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 063003 [ 2011.13286]

2021 arXiv
[14]

S. Tremaine, The Hamiltonian for von Zeipel–Lidov–Kozai oscillations , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 522 (2023) 937 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/522/1/937/50009201/stad1029.pdf]

2023
[15]

K.J. Li, K. Wu, Z. Younsi and T.G.F. Li, Complete Hamiltonian Framework of Relativistic Hierarchical Triple Systems: Capabilities and Limitations of Secular Perturbation Theory , 2501.08377

arXiv
[16]

Klein and B

Y.Y. Klein and B. Katz, Hierarchical three-body problem at high eccentricities = simple pendulum II: octupole including Brown ’s Hamiltonian, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 535 (2024) L31 [2408.04003]

2024 arXiv
[17]

Naoz, W.M

S. Naoz, W.M. Farr, Y. Lithwick, F.A. Rasio and J. Teyssandier, Secular Dynamics in Three-Body Systems, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 431 (2013) 2155 [ 1107.2414]

2013 arXiv
[18]

Yue and Z

X.-J. Yue and Z. Cao, Dark matter minispike: A significant enhancement of eccentricity for intermediate-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 043013 [ 1908.10241]

2019 arXiv
[19]

Hu, R.-G

L. Hu, R.-G. Cai and S.-J. Wang, Distinctive GWBs from eccentric inspiraling SMBH binaries with a DM spike , 2312.14041

arXiv
[21]

Pani, Binary pulsars as dark-matter probes , Phys

P. Pani, Binary pulsars as dark-matter probes , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 123530 [ 1512.01236]

2015 arXiv
[22]

K.J. Li, K. Wu, P.K. Leung and D. Singh, Relativistic scattering of a fast spinning neutron star by a massive black hole , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 511 (2022) 3602 [ 2110.03494]

2022 arXiv
[23]

Blaes, M.H

O. Blaes, M.H. Lee and A. Socrates, The kozai mechanism and the evolution of binary supermassive black holes , Astrophys. J. 578 (2002) 775 [ astro-ph/0203370]

2002 arXiv
[24]

Yunes, M

N. Yunes, M. Coleman Miller and J. Thornburg, The Effect of Massive Perturbers on Extreme Mass-Ratio Inspiral Waveforms , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 044030 [ 1010.1721]

2011 arXiv
[25]

Gondolo and J

P. Gondolo and J. Silk, Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1719 [ astro-ph/9906391]

1999 arXiv
[26]

K. Eda, Y. Itoh, S. Kuroyanagi and J. Silk, Gravitational waves as a probe of dark matter minispikes, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 044045 [ 1408.3534]

2015 arXiv
[27]

Chandrasekhar, Dynamical Friction

S. Chandrasekhar, Dynamical Friction. I. General Considerations: the Coefficient of Dynamical Friction, Astrophys. J. 97 (1943) 255. – 26 –

1943
[28]

Binney and S

J. Binney and S. Tremaine, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition , Princeton University Press (2008)

2008
[29]

Gualandris and D

A. Gualandris and D. Merritt, Ejection of Supermassive Black Holes from Galaxy Cores , Astrophys. J. 678 (2008) 780 [ 0708.0771]

2008 arXiv
[30]

Poisson and C

E. Poisson and C. Will, Gravity: Newtonian, Post-Newtonian, Relativistic , Cambridge University Press (2014)

2014
[31]

Kormendy and L.C

J. Kormendy and L.C. Ho, Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51 (2013) 511 [ 1304.7762]

2013 arXiv
[32]

S. Chen, A. Sesana and C.J. Conselice, Constraining astrophysical observables of Galaxy and Supermassive Black Hole Binary Mergers using Pulsar Timing Arrays , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 488 (2019) 401 [ 1810.04184]

2019 arXiv
[33]

Girelli, L

G. Girelli, L. Pozzetti, M. Bolzonella, C. Giocoli, F. Marulli and M. Baldi, The stellar-to-halo mass relation over the past 12 Gyr: I. Standard ΛCDM model, Astron. Astrophys. 634 (2020) A135 [2001.02230]

2020 arXiv
[34]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ 1807.06209]

2020 arXiv
[35]

Klypin, G

A. Klypin, G. Yepes, S. Gottlober, F. Prada and S. Hess, MultiDark simulations: the story of dark matter halo concentrations and density profiles , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 457 (2016) 4340 [1411.4001]

2016 arXiv
[36]

Navarro, C.S

J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White, A Universal density profile from hierarchical clustering, Astrophys. J. 490 (1997) 493 [ astro-ph/9611107]. – 27 –

1997 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [20]

Alonso- ´Alvarez, J.M

G. Alonso- ´Alvarez, J.M. Cline and C. Dewar, Self-Interacting Dark Matter Solves the Final Parsec Problem of Supermassive Black Hole Mergers , Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 021401 [2401.14450]

arXiv 2024

[2] [1]

Kozai, Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity , Astron

Y. Kozai, Secular perturbations of asteroids with high inclination and eccentricity , Astron. J. 67 (1962) 591

work page 1962

[3] [2]

Lidov, The evolution of orbits of artificial satellites of planets under the action of gravitational perturbations of external bodies , Planet

M.L. Lidov, The evolution of orbits of artificial satellites of planets under the action of gravitational perturbations of external bodies , Planet. Space Sci. 9 (1962) 719

work page 1962

[4] [3]

Zeipel, Sur l’application des s´ eries de m

H.V. Zeipel, Sur l’application des s´ eries de m. lindstedt ` a l’´ etude du mouvement des com` etes p´ eriodiques, Astronomische Nachrichten 183 (1909) 345 [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/asna.19091832202]

doi:10.1002/asna.19091832202 1909

[5] [4]

Naoz, W.M

S. Naoz, W.M. Farr, Y. Lithwick, F.A. Rasio and J. Teyssandier, Hot Jupiters from Secular Planet–Planet Interactions, Nature 473 (2011) 187 [ 1011.2501]

arXiv 2011

[6] [5]

Will, Orbital flips in hierarchical triple systems: relativistic effects and third-body effects to hexadecapole order, Phys

C.M. Will, Orbital flips in hierarchical triple systems: relativistic effects and third-body effects to hexadecapole order, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 023017 [ 1705.03962]

arXiv 2017

[7] [6]

Hamers and S.F

A.S. Hamers and S.F. Portegies Zwart, Secular dynamics of hierarchical multiple systems composed of nested binaries, with an arbitrary number of bodies and arbitrary hierarchical structure. First applications to multiplanet and multistar systems , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 459 (2016) 2827 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf...

work page 2016

[8] [7]

Randall and Z.-Z

L. Randall and Z.-Z. Xianyu, An Analytical Portrait of Binary Mergers in Hierarchical Triple Systems, Astrophys. J. 864 (2018) 134 [ 1802.05718]. – 25 –

arXiv 2018