Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 58 references

The two-loop coefficient functions for double deeply virtual Compton scattering

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives the complete two-loop coefficient functions for double deeply virtual Compton scattering in general kinematics using conformal symmetry.

desk verdict First two-loop DDVCS coefficient functions with a solid calculation, but the completeness of the solution ansatz is assumed rather than proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.14985 v1 pith:PCY42YXT submitted 2024-11-22 hep-ph

Vladimir M. Braun , Hua-Yu Jiang , Alexander N. Manashov , Andreas von Manteuffel This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph PACS 12.38.Bx13.60.Fz
keywords doubledeeplyvirtualComptonscatteringcoefficientfunctionsconformalsymmetrygeneralizedpartondistributionsNNLOQCDWilson-Fischerfixedpointoperatorproductexpansionpolylogarithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper calculates the two-loop coefficient functions entering the operator product expansion of two electromagnetic currents when the two photons have different virtualities, i.e. for double deeply virtual Compton scattering (DDVCS). The results supply the flavor-nonsinglet vector ingredient needed for next-to-next-to-leading-order (NNLO) predictions of this process, which can be used to extract generalized parton distributions from exclusive lepton-pair electroproduction. The authors obtain analytic expressions in momentum-fraction space in the MS scheme, expressed through generalized polylogarithms up to weight four, and verify them against known limits. Their numerical estimates show that the two-loop corrections are large for the kinematics of proposed fixed-target and collider experiments, so the new terms are relevant for interpreting upcoming data.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the conformal-symmetry reduction of off-forward coefficient functions to forward ones. At the Wilson-Fischer fixed point in $d=4-2\epsilon$, the OPE of two conserved currents is fixed by two constants per spin, which are identified with the DIS coefficient functions; this yields the master equations (3.30). The solution uses the ansatz $C_i(\omega x,\omega)=\int_{-1}^{1} dx'\, c_i(\omega,x') K_i(x',x,\omega)$, where $K_i$ are SL(2)-invariant kernels determined by their Mellin spectra, and the weight functions $c_i$ are chosen so that the spectra are expressed directly through moments of the DIS coefficient functions and the eigenvalues of the rotation operator $U$ that connects the rotated scheme to the MS scheme. The SL(2)-invariant kernels are reconstructed via an intertwining operator $T$ and evaluated in momentum-fraction space through position-space convolution integrals computed with the HyperInt package. A decisive simplification is that the invariant kernels turn out not to depend on the ratio of photon virtualities $\omega$, which is what makes the calculation feasible.

What would settle it

Evaluate the two-loop transverse coefficient function at a generic kinematic point with unequal photon virtualities, for example $z=0.3$, $\omega=-1.27$, $Q^2=\mu^2$, by a direct Feynman-diagram calculation and compare with the expressions in Appendix E. A mismatch away from the special limits would show that the ansatz (3.33) misses contributions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the two-loop flavor-nonsinglet vector coefficient functions for the OPE of two electromagnetic currents in the MS scheme are now known in closed analytic form for general kinematics with two different photon virtualities. The calculation works by evaluating the conformal OPE at the Wilson-Fischer fixed point in $d=4-2\epsilon$ dimensions, where conformal symmetry fixes the off-forward coefficient functions in terms of known deep-inelastic-scattering coefficient functions plus lower-order off-forward information, and then restoring the physical four-dimensional MS result with the QCD $\beta$ function. Explicit results are presented in Appendix E and two ancillary files using different representations of generalized polylogarithms. The paper checks the results against the DVCS limit $\omega=1$, against an independent threshold-resummation calculation, and against the expected analyticity at $q_1^2+q_2^2=0$.

Load-bearing premise

The solution ansatz in Eq. (3.33) assumes that every coefficient function that can occur at two loops can be represented as a convolution of simple weight functions with SL(2)-invariant kernels, and there is no proof that this representation spans all possible contributions; a missing term in the bulk kinematic region would not be caught by the checks performed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • DDVCS can now be described at NNLO for the flavor-nonsinglet vector channel, giving the process the same perturbative accuracy as modern inclusive PDF fits.
  • The analytic expressions, together with the analytic-continuation prescription in Eq. (2.15), provide predictions for DVCS, TCS and DDVCS kinematics from the same Euclidean result.
  • The two-loop corrections are numerically large in the considered JLab and EIC kinematics, especially for the imaginary part of $F_\perp$ and for $F_L$, so they cannot be neglected in the analysis of proposed experiments.
  • The method reduces the $\ell$-loop off-forward coefficient-function problem to the known forward (DIS) coefficient function plus an $(\ell-1)$-loop off-forward calculation in $4-2\epsilon$ dimensions, indicating a route to higher perturbative orders.
  • The technique carries over to coefficient functions for correlations of other quark-antiquark currents, with light-cone sum rules for pion form factors as a stated application.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same conformal-symmetry route should extend to NNLO coefficient functions for axial-vector, scalar, and tensor currents, and hence to pion electromagnetic and transition form factors at NNLO.
  • Editorial inference: the apparent lack of convergence of the longitudinal Compton form factor at the tested low lepton-pair mass suggests that NNLO alone may not be sufficient for precision phenomenology in that kinematic corner; higher scales or resummations may be needed.
  • Editorial inference: the analytic expressions provide a direct numerical basis for comparing future DDVCS measurements at JLab and the EIC with GPD-based predictions, making the coefficient functions part of a testable extraction framework.
  • Editorial inference: because the invariant kernels are independent of $\omega$, the same kernels may be reusable for other two-photon processes whose coefficient functions differ only through the forward DIS input, saving effort in future NNLO calculations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper computes the two-loop, flavor-nonsinglet vector coefficient functions for the OPE of two electromagnetic currents in general kinematics with two different photon virtualities, i.e., for double deeply virtual Compton scattering (DDVCS). The calculation uses conformal symmetry of large- n_f QCD at the Wilson-Fisher fixed point, following the program of Braun, Manashov, Moch, and collaborators. The authors introduce a new solution ansatz in momentum-fraction space, reconstruct SL(2)-invariant kernels from their Mellin spectra, and obtain analytic expressions for the longitudinal and transverse coefficient functions in the MS scheme. They provide the results in Appendix E and in two ancillary files, perform several internal consistency checks (one-loop limit, DVCS limit, analyticity at q1^2+q2^2=0, and agreement with the threshold resummation by Schoenleber), and estimate the numerical impact for kinematics of proposed DDVCS experiments.

Significance. If the results are correct, they provide the first two-loop off-forward coefficient functions for DDVCS with two different photon virtualities, an ingredient needed for NNLO phenomenology of lepton-pair electroproduction and related two-photon processes. The methodological contribution is also significant: the conformal-symmetry construction is extended to unequal photon virtualities, and the analytic results are made available in two complementary representations, including one with no spurious singularities. The paper includes several nontrivial checks, an independent threshold-resummation comparison, and reproducible ancillary files for numerical evaluation. The main open question is whether the solution ansatz in Sec. 3.3 is complete; if that gap can be closed, the paper would be a strong contribution to the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3.3, Eqs. (3.30), (3.33), (3.36), (3.39)] The central calculation rests on the ansatz C_i(ωx,ω) = ∫ dx' c_i(ω,x') K_i(x',x,ω), with K_i reconstructed from its Mellin spectrum. The moment equations (3.30) involve the N-dependent, non-orthogonal family P_N^{λ_N}(x) with λ_N = 3/2 − ϵ* + γ_N/2, and no completeness or injectivity statement is provided for this family in the space of functions with the analyticity properties expected of two-loop coefficient functions. Matching all even-N moments determines the coefficient function uniquely only if this moment problem is injective; otherwise the construction yields one particular solution. The checks reported in Sec. 4 and Appendix F (DVCS limit ω=1, analyticity for λ→0, threshold behavior, and agreement with Schoenleber) probe restricted or boundary kinematics and cannot detect a bulk term that vanishes in those limits. Please either prove that {P_N^{λ_N}} is complete in the relevant function space and that the ansatz (3.33) with the choice (3.36) spans the full space of two-loop coefficient functions, or provide an independent bulk check, such as a direct evaluation of a few lowest moments for representative ω≠1 or a numerical two-loop computation at a generic kinematic point. This is load-bearing for the abstract claim that these are the two-loop coefficient functions.
  2. [Sec. 4 and Appendix F] The comparison with the independent threshold-resummation calculation by Schoenleber is stated only verbally as an agreement. Because this check is a key external validation of the singular behavior, the paper should provide at least a short quantitative comparison, e.g., the first few threshold coefficients from both calculations displayed together. This would allow the reader to assess the accuracy of the comparison and to understand exactly which terms are being tested.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Page 2 and Sec. 4] There are typographical errors: "particulari-" in the Introduction and "map our results map our 1-loop and 2-loop results" in Sec. 4. These should be corrected.
  2. [Notation throughout, especially Eqs. (2.18), (E.2)-(E.15), and (F.1)] The symbol "w" is used interchangeably with "ω" in several formulas, sometimes in the same expression. The notation should be unified to avoid ambiguity.
  3. [Eq. (3.31)] The arrow notation in the limit ω→1 is nonstandard; the limit should be written explicitly with a subscript or the word "→" rather than "7→".
  4. [Sec. 5] For the longitudinal Compton form factor, the NNLO correction is so large that the truncation does not show signs of convergence at the chosen kinematics. This is not a flaw in the coefficient functions, but it should be stated as a caveat in the numerical discussion so that the reader does not interpret Fig. 2 as a convergent prediction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the two-loop CFs are constructed from known DIS CFs via conformal symmetry, with external checks; the unproven completeness of the solution ansatz is a correctness risk, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (i) input the known DIS coefficient functions and anomalous dimensions, (ii) use the conformal-symmetry framework developed in prior work by the same authors to relate off-forward CFs to forward CFs, (iii) solve the resulting moment equations (3.30) by the ansatz (3.33), and (iv) verify against known one-loop results, the DVCS limit, and an independent threshold-resummation calculation. The self-citations to [13], [20], and [21] are substantial and load-bearing, but they are not circular: they are mathematical results about conformal generators, rotation operators, and invariant kernels, with stated assumptions that do not include the two-loop DDVCS CFs themselves. The construction in Eqs. (3.36)-(3.39) does not fit any parameter to the target CFs; it solves the physical moment equations by separation of variables. The skeptic's concern about the completeness of the ansatz (3.33) is a legitimate correctness risk: if the moment problem is not injective on the space of two-loop CFs, a contribution orthogonal to all P_N^{λ_N} could be missed. However, that is an unproven completeness assumption, not a circular reduction of the output to the input. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks, and no step exhibits Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on the conformal symmetry framework developed in previous work by the same authors, plus the standard DIS coefficient functions; it introduces no fitted parameters in the central result. The main caveat is the ansatz completeness assumption.

free parameters (2)
  • GPD model shape parameter n = 1/2
    Chosen by hand for the toy GPD model in Eq. (5.4) used in the numerical estimates; does not enter the coefficient function derivation itself.
  • factorization scale and coupling choices = mu^2 = (q2^2 - q1^2)/2, alpha_s=0.4, nf=3
    Input choices for the numerical impact study in Section 5; not part of the analytic two-loop result.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption QCD at the Wilson-Fischer fixed point in d=4-2epsilon is conformally invariant, permitting conformal algebra methods for OPEs.
    Invoked throughout Section 3.1 to relate off-forward CFs to forward DIS CFs; relies on the large-nf fixed point and analytic continuation in epsilon.
  • domain assumption There exists a rotated renormalization scheme with operator U, eigenvalues sigma_N, and conformal generators (3.24) that simplify the GPD decomposition.
    Construction taken from the authors' prior work [20]; central to the master equation (3.30).
  • ad hoc to paper The solution ansatz (3.33) is complete: CFs are representable as convolutions of weight functions with SL(2)-invariant kernels, and kernels are fixed by their spectra.
    Main constructive step in Section 3.3; completeness is unproven and only checked a posteriori via limits.
  • standard math Known three-loop DIS coefficient functions are valid inputs in 4-2epsilon at the critical point.
    Used as forward limit input in Eqs. (3.19), (3.20), (3.30); taken from Ref. [37].
  • domain assumption Reciprocity relation and intertwining operator T of Eqs. (4.1)-(4.3) are valid for reconstructing two-loop kernels from spectra.
    Taken from Ref. [21] by the same group; used to rebuild K from bK.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The two-loop coefficient functions for double deeply virtual Compton scattering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PCY42YXT

@misc{pith2026241114985,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The two-loop coefficient functions for double deeply virtual Compton scattering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PCY42YXT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14985}
}
abstract

Making use of conformal symmetry of large-$n_f$ QCD in $d=4-2\epsilon$ dimensions at the Wilson-Fischer fixed point, we calculate the two-loop coefficient functions in the operator product expansion of two electromagnetic currents in general kinematics with two different photon virtualities. This result is necessary for the description of the double deeply virtual Compton scattering to the next-to-next-to-leading order accuracy, but is also interesting for a range of other two-photon processes. We present analytic expression for the coefficient function in momentum fraction space in the $\overline{\text{MS}}$ scheme and study its numerical impact on the Compton form factors for a simple model of the generalized parton distributions. The calculated corrections turn out to be large and are significant for the kinematics of proposed experiments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ji, Deeply virtual Compton scattering , Phys

    X.-D. Ji, Deeply virtual Compton scattering , Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 7114–7125, [hep-ph/9609381]. – 33 –

    arXiv 1997

  2. [2]

    A. V. Radyushkin, Scaling limit of deeply virtual Compton scattering , Phys. Lett. B380 (1996) 417–425, [hep-ph/9604317]

    arXiv 1996

  3. [3]

    M¨ uller, D

    D. M¨ uller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F. M. Dittes and J. Hoˇ rejˇ si,Wave functions, evolution equations and evolution kernels from light ray operators of QCD , Fortsch. Phys. 42 (1994) 101–141, [hep-ph/9812448]

    arXiv 1994

  4. [4]

    A. V. Belitsky and D. Mueller, Exclusive electroproduction of lepton pairs as a probe of nucleon structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 022001, [ hep-ph/0210313]

    arXiv 2003

  5. [5]

    Double deeply virtual Compton scattering off the nucleon

    M. Guidal and M. Vanderhaeghen, Double deeply virtual Compton scattering off the nucleon , Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 012001, [ hep-ph/0208275]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    S. Zhao, A. Camsonne, D. Marchand, M. Mazouz, N. Sparveris, S. Stepanyan et al., Double deeply virtual Compton scattering with positron beams at SoLID , Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (2021) 240, [2103.12773]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Abdul Khalek et al., Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report , Nucl

    R. Abdul Khalek et al., Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report , Nucl. Phys. A 1026 (2022) 122447, [ 2103.05419]

    arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    D. P. Anderle et al., Electron-ion collider in China , Front. Phys. (Beijing) 16 (2021) 64701, [2102.09222]

    arXiv 2021

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    K. Deja, V. Martinez-Fernandez, B. Pire, P. Sznajder and J. Wagner, Phenomenology of double deeply virtual Compton scattering in the era of new experiments , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 094035, [2303.13668]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Accardi et al., A Critical Appraisal and Evaluation of Modern PDFs , Eur

    A. Accardi et al., A Critical Appraisal and Evaluation of Modern PDFs , Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 471, [ 1603.08906]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Ji and J

    X.-D. Ji and J. Osborne, One loop QCD corrections to deeply virtual Compton scattering: The Parton helicity independent case , Phys. Rev. D57 (1998) 1337–1340, [ hep-ph/9707254]

    1998 arXiv

  4. [12]

    A. V. Belitsky and D. M¨ uller, Predictions from conformal algebra for the deeply virtual Compton scattering, Phys. Lett. B417 (1998) 129–140, [ hep-ph/9709379]

    1998 arXiv

  5. [13]

    V. M. Braun, A. N. Manashov, S. Moch and J. Schoenleber, Two-loop coefficient function for DVCS: vector contributions, JHEP 09 (2020) 117, [ 2007.06348]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    J. Gao, T. Huber, Y. Ji and Y.-M. Wang, Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order QCD Prediction for the Photon-Pion Form Factor , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) 062003, [ 2106.01390]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    V. M. Braun, A. N. Manashov, S. Moch and J. Schoenleber, Axial-vector contributions in two-photon reactions: Pion transition form factor and deeply-virtual Compton scattering at NNLO in QCD , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 094007, [ 2106.01437]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    V. M. Braun, Y. Ji and J. Schoenleber, Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 172001, [ 2207.06818]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Ji and J

    Y. Ji and J. Schoenleber, Two-loop coefficient functions in deeply virtual Compton scattering: flavor-singlet axial-vector and transversity case , JHEP 01 (2024) 053, [ 2310.05724]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    A. V. Belitsky and D. M¨ uller, Broken conformal invariance and spectrum of anomalous dimensions in QCD , Nucl. Phys. B537 (1999) 397–442, [ hep-ph/9804379]

    1999 arXiv

  11. [19]

    A. V. Belitsky, A. Freund and D. M¨ uller,Evolution kernels of skewed parton distributions: Method and two loop results , Nucl. Phys. B574 (2000) 347–406, [ hep-ph/9912379]. – 34 –

    2000 arXiv

  12. [20]

    V. M. Braun, A. N. Manashov, S. Moch and M. Strohmaier, Three-loop evolution equation for flavor-nonsinglet operators in off-forward kinematics , JHEP 06 (2017) 037, [ 1703.09532]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Y. Ji, A. Manashov and S.-O. Moch, Evolution kernels of twist-two operators , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 054009, [ 2307.01763]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    V. M. Braun, K. G. Chetyrkin and A. N. Manashov, NNLO anomalous dimension matrix for twist-two flavor-singlet operators , Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022) 137409, [ 2205.08228]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    S. J. Brodsky, P. Damgaard, Y. Frishman and G. P. Lepage, Conformal symmetry: exclusive processes beyond leading order, Phys. Rev. D33 (1986) 1881

    1986

  16. [24]

    M¨ uller,Constraints for anomalous dimensions of local light cone operators in ϕ3 in six-dimensions theory, Z

    D. M¨ uller,Constraints for anomalous dimensions of local light cone operators in ϕ3 in six-dimensions theory, Z. Phys. C49 (1991) 293–300

    1991

  17. [25]

    V. M. Braun and A. N. Manashov, Evolution equations beyond one loop from conformal symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C73 (2013) 2544, [ 1306.5644]

    2013 arXiv

  18. [26]

    V. M. Braun, A. N. Manashov, S. Moch and M. Strohmaier, Conformal symmetry of QCD in d-dimensions, Phys. Lett. B793 (2019) 78–84, [ 1810.04993]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    A. V. Belitsky and A. V. Radyushkin, Unraveling hadron structure with generalized parton distributions, Phys. Rept. 418 (2005) 1–387, [ hep-ph/0504030]

    2005 arXiv

  20. [28]

    A. V. Radyushkin, Nonforward parton distributions , Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 5524–5557, [hep-ph/9704207]

    1997 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Ji and J

    X.-D. Ji and J. Osborne, One loop corrections and all order factorization in deeply virtual Compton scattering, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 094018, [ hep-ph/9801260]

    1998 arXiv

  22. [30]

    J. C. Collins and A. Freund, Proof of factorization for deeply virtual Compton scattering in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 074009, [ hep-ph/9801262]

    1999 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Diehl, Generalized parton distributions, Phys

    M. Diehl, Generalized parton distributions, Phys. Rept. 388 (2003) 41–277, [ hep-ph/0307382]

    2003 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Mueller, B

    D. Mueller, B. Pire, L. Szymanowski and J. Wagner, On timelike and spacelike hard exclusive reactions, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 031502, [ 1203.4392]

    2012 arXiv

  25. [33]

    B. Pire, L. Szymanowski and J. Wagner, NLO corrections to timelike, spacelike and double deeply virtual Compton scattering , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 034009, [ 1101.0555]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Mankiewicz, G

    L. Mankiewicz, G. Piller, E. Stein, M. Vanttinen and T. Weigl, NLO corrections to deeply virtual Compton scattering , Phys. Lett. B 425 (1998) 186–192, [ hep-ph/9712251]

    1998 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Fortin, B

    J.-F. Fortin, B. Grinstein and A. Stergiou, Limit Cycles and Conformal Invariance , JHEP 01 (2013) 184, [ 1208.3674]

    2013 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Ferrara, A

    S. Ferrara, A. F. Grillo, G. Parisi and R. Gatto, The shadow operator formalism for conformal algebra. Vacuum expectation values and operator products , Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4S2 (1972) 115–120

    1972

  29. [37]

    J. A. M. Vermaseren, A. Vogt and S. Moch, The Third-order QCD corrections to deep-inelastic scattering by photon exchange , Nucl. Phys. B724 (2005) 3–182, [ hep-ph/0504242]

    2005 arXiv

  30. [38]

    V. M. Braun, A. N. Manashov, S. Moch and M. Strohmaier, Two-loop conformal generators for leading-twist operators in QCD , JHEP 03 (2016) 142, [ 1601.05937]. – 35 –

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Panzer, Algorithms for the symbolic integration of hyperlogarithms with applications to Feynman integrals, Comput

    E. Panzer, Algorithms for the symbolic integration of hyperlogarithms with applications to Feynman integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 188 (2015) 148–166, [ 1403.3385]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Yu. L. Dokshitzer, G. Marchesini and G. P. Salam, Revisiting parton evolution and the large-x limit, Phys. Lett. B634 (2006) 504–507, [ hep-ph/0511302]

    2006 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Basso and G

    B. Basso and G. P. Korchemsky, Anomalous dimensions of high-spin operators beyond the leading order, Nucl. Phys. B775 (2007) 1–30, [ hep-th/0612247]

    2007 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Vermaseren, Harmonic sums, Mellin transforms and integrals , Int

    J. Vermaseren, Harmonic sums, Mellin transforms and integrals , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14 (1999) 2037–2076, [ hep-ph/9806280]

    1999 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Y. L. Dokshitzer and G. Marchesini, N=4 SUSY Yang-Mills: three loops made simple(r) , Phys. Lett. B 646 (2007) 189–201, [ hep-th/0612248]

    2007 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Beccaria and V

    M. Beccaria and V. Forini, Four loop reciprocity of twist two operators in N=4 SYM , JHEP 03 (2009) 111, [ 0901.1256]

    2009 arXiv

  37. [45]

    A. B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes , Math. Res. Lett. 5 (1998) 497–516, [ 1105.2076]

    1998 arXiv

  38. [46]

    A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu and A. Volovich, Classical Polylogarithms for Amplitudes and Wilson Loops , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 151605, [ 1006.5703]

    2010 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Vollinga and S

    J. Vollinga and S. Weinzierl, Numerical evaluation of multiple polylogarithms , Comput. Phys. Commun. 167 (2005) 177, [ hep-ph/0410259]

    2005 arXiv

  40. [48]

    C. W. Bauer, A. Frink and R. Kreckel, Introduction to the GiNaC framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language , J. Symb. Comput. 33 (2002) 1–12, [cs/0004015]

    2002 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Y. Wang, L. L. Yang and B. Zhou, FastGPL: a C++ library for fast evaluation of generalized polylogarithms, 2112.04122

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    C. Duhr, H. Gangl and J. R. Rhodes, From polygons and symbols to polylogarithmic functions , JHEP 10 (2012) 075, [ 1110.0458]

    2012 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Bonciani, A

    R. Bonciani, A. Ferroglia, T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus, Light-quark two-loop corrections to heavy-quark pair production in the gluon fusion channel , JHEP 12 (2013) 038, [ 1309.4450]

    2013 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi, The two-loop helicity amplitudes for qq′ → V1V2 → 4 leptons, JHEP 09 (2015) 128, [ 1503.04812]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Schoenleber, Threshold resummation for double-deeply virtual Compton scattering , 2411.11686

    J. Schoenleber, Threshold resummation for double-deeply virtual Compton scattering , 2411.11686

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    V. M. Braun, A. Khodjamirian and M. Maul, Pion form-factor in QCD at intermediate momentum transfers, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 073004, [ hep-ph/9907495]

    2000 arXiv

  47. [55]

    S. S. Agaev, V. M. Braun, N. Offen and F. A. Porkert, Light Cone Sum Rules for the pi0-gamma*-gamma Form Factor Revisited, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 054020, [ 1012.4671]

    2011 arXiv

  48. [56]

    V. M. Braun, A. N. Manashov and B. Pirnay, Finite-t and target mass corrections to DVCS on a scalar target , Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 014003, [ 1205.3332]. – 36 –

    2012 arXiv

  49. [57]

    J. M. Borwein, D. M. Bradley, D. J. Broadhurst and P. Lisonek, Special values of multiple polylogarithms, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 353 (2001) 907–941, [ math/9910045]

    2001 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Schoenleber, Resummation of threshold logarithms in deeply-virtual Compton scattering , JHEP 02 (2023) 207, [ 2209.09015]

    J. Schoenleber, Resummation of threshold logarithms in deeply-virtual Compton scattering , JHEP 02 (2023) 207, [ 2209.09015]. – 37 –

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.