Tiny yet detectable WIMP-nucleon scattering cross sections in a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter model

Kota Ichiki; Tomohiro Abe

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Tiny yet detectable WIMP-nucleon scattering cross sections in a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter model

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter model with two stable components predicts WIMP-nucleon scattering cross sections below current bounds but above the neutrino fog, giving next-generation direct detection…

desk verdict A solid pNG dark matter paper with a genuinely new single-VEV construction and concrete two-component direct detection targets, conditional on an explicitly assumed real-coupling/C_dark symmetry. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15755 v1 pith:2TEOCXOC submitted 2024-11-24 hep-ph astro-ph.CO

Tomohiro Abe , Kota Ichiki This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phastro-ph.CO

keywords pseudo-Nambu-Goldstonedarkmattertwo-componentWIMP-nucleonscatteringdirectdetectionrelicabundancediscretesymmetryCdarkneutrinofogSU(2)gaugesector

topics Dark Matter

open problems Dark Matter

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a dark matter model in which the main particle is a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson that naturally avoids direct detection, and argues that a second, subdominant particle can still be seen. The model builds the pNG field from breaking an $SU(2)_x$ gauge symmetry together with a softly broken global $SU(2)_g$ symmetry. If all dark-sector couplings are real, a discrete charge-conjugation symmetry stabilizes the lighter of a gauge boson or a CP-odd scalar, creating two-component dark matter. The paper computes relic abundances and finds the pNG particle is the dominant component in large parameter regions. Because the subdominant partner's scattering rate is suppressed only by its number density, the effective WIMP-nucleon cross section falls below current bounds yet above the neutrino fog, giving concrete targets for next-generation experiments.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the complex pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone field $\chi$, stabilized by an unbroken global $U(1)_D$, and the discrete charge-conjugation symmetry $C_{\rm dark}$ that arises when all scalar potential parameters are real. $C_{\rm dark}$ makes the lighter of $V^0$ or $a_0$ exactly stable, opening the two-component dark matter scenarios. The argument runs on the density-rescaling identity $\sigma_{\rm SI} = (\Omega_i/\Omega_{\rm DM})\, \sigma_i^{\rm SI}$, which converts an unsuppressed per-particle cross section into a small but observable effective rate, together with the orthogonality relation $\sum_j R_{2j}R_{3j}=0$ that makes the $\chi$-quark amplitude vanish at $t \to 0$.

What would settle it

A measurement of a dark-sector CP-violating phase, such as a non-zero electric dipole moment or the observation of decays of $V^0$ or $a_0$ into standard-model particles, would break $C_{\rm dark}$ and invalidate the two-component scenarios. Alternatively, a next-generation xenon experiment reaching the neutrino fog sensitivity in the $0.6$--$3$ TeV mass range that sees no events where the paper predicts $\sigma_{\rm SI}$ above the fog would falsify those scenarios.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the $SU(2)_x \times SU(2)_g$ pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter model predicts two-component dark matter scenarios in which the effective spin-independent WIMP-nucleon cross section, rescaled by the relic-density ratio $\Omega_i/\Omega_{\rm DM}$, is smaller than current upper bounds but above the neutrino fog over large parameter regions. The pNG boson $\chi$ is the dominant component, evading detection because its tree-level scattering amplitude is proportional to the squared momentum transfer and vanishes in the zero-transfer limit. The subdominant $V^0$ or $a_0$ scatters without that suppression, but its event rate is diluted by its small relic fraction. The paper demonstrates this for the $\chi$--$V^0$ scenario when $m_\chi < m_V < 2m_\chi$, and for the $\chi$--$a_0$ scenario when $m_{a_0} < \min(m_V, 2m_\chi)$, with the $a_0$ cross section vanishing at $m_{a_0} = m_\chi$ because the scalar potential's global symmetry is enhanced there.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes every coupling in the dark scalar potential is real, which makes the discrete $C_{\rm dark}$ symmetry exact; if any CP-violating phase exists, $V^0$ and $a_0$ acquire decay channels and the two-component direct detection forecasts disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In the single-component case, the required $v/v_s$ decreases as $m_\chi$ grows, because $\chi\bar\chi$ annihilation is dominated by $t$-channel $V^\pm$ exchange rather than by scalar couplings, opposite to the trend in many earlier pNG models.
In the $\chi$--$V^0$ scenario, $V^0$ is produced through the bouncing process $\chi\bar\chi \to V^0 h_j$ and carries about one percent of the dark matter energy density for $1.2\,m_\chi \lesssim m_V \lesssim 2m_\chi - m_{h_3}$, placing the effective cross section above the neutrino fog.
In the $\chi$--$a_0$ scenario, $a_0$ is subdominant for $m_{a_0} > m_\chi$, its effective cross section vanishes at $m_{a_0} = m_\chi$, and for smaller $m_{a_0}$ with small $\sin\theta_h$ the cross section can lie between the LZ bound and the neutrino fog.
The model avoids the domain-wall problem because no discrete global symmetry is spontaneously broken, and it avoids a Landau pole because the $SU(2)_x$ gauge coupling is asymptotically free.
The benchmark parameter points satisfy the measured Higgs couplings, the Higgs invisible decay bound, and perturbative unitarity, with the gauge coupling constrained by $g_D < \sqrt{16\pi}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: the same density-rescaling logic should apply to any subdominant stable component in other pNG frameworks, so future direct detection analyses that normalize to the total dark matter density will systematically underweight the second component's true per-particle cross section.
Beyond the paper: the tree-level quietness of $\chi$ is used without a full loop calculation; if loop-induced $\chi$-nucleon scattering approaches the neutrino fog, the single-component regions would need revision, while the two-component forecasts based on $V^0$ and $a_0$ would remain intact.
Beyond the paper: the reality assumption is doing heavy lifting; if future electric dipole moment searches or collider probes reveal CP-violating phases in the dark sector, $C_{\rm dark}$ breaks, $V^0$ and $a_0$ decay, and only the single-component scenario survives.
Beyond the paper: a sharp, testable feature is the resonance at $m_{a_0} = m_V/2$ where $V^0$ exchange in the $s$-channel makes $a_0$ the dominant component; future direct detection data could search for a mass-dependent cross-section spike at that kinematic relation.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear Colleague — quick take on Abe & Ichiki, arXiv:2411.15755.

The thing you should know: this is a well-constructed pNG DM paper with a genuinely new model-building ingredient — a single SU(2)_x × SU(2)_g bi-fundamental VEV — and it turns the usual pNG null direct-detection prediction into concrete two-component targets above the neutrino fog. Read it if you work on pNG or multi-component DM. The main result is conditional, not a clean prediction: it depends on an assumed real-coupling/C_dark symmetry that the paper does not derive.

What is actually new and good. The construction differs from the earlier two-VEV SU(2) model [19] and the two-complex-scalar model [20] by generating a complex pNG chi from one VEV and then getting a second stable component from C_dark. Avoiding the domain-wall problem and the U(1) Landau pole are real advantages. The tree-level derivation in Eq. (4.1) is clean: the orthogonality of R kills the t→0 amplitude, so the pNG scattering cancellation is made rigorous. The effective V0 and a0 cross sections in Eqs. (5.4)-(5.5) and (6.3) are straightforward and internally consistent. They use micrOMEGAs 6.0 for the two-component relic abundance and include Higgs coupling, invisible decay, and perturbative unitarity constraints. The appendices on the accidental SU(2) and the λ3=λ4 symmetry restoration are useful.

The soft spots, in order of size. First and most important, the stress-test note is right: C_dark exists only because Sec. 2.4 assumes all scalar-potential couplings are real. If μ2_2, λ2, λ3 or λ̃2 carry physical phases, V0 and a0 decay and the two-component scenarios of Secs 5.2 and 6.2 simply disappear. That does not invalidate the calculations — they are coherent given real couplings — but the abstract and conclusion should say "predicts, provided exact real couplings," not just "predicts." I would ask the authors to foreground this condition and, ideally, to estimate how small CP violation must be for V0/a0 to remain cosmologically stable.

Second, the loop-level chi-nucleon amplitude is not computed. Section 4.2 explicitly says it naively expects it to be small, citing other pNG models. Since chi is the dominant DM component in the two-component scenarios, a loop contribution near or above the V0/a0 signal would change the interpretation. It likely sits below the neutrino fog as in previous models, but the paper does not show it.

Third, minor: no public model files or code are provided, even though the calculation uses FeynRules and micrOMEGAs. Also, vs is tuned to reproduce Ωh^2=0.12, so the relic abundance curves are fits; the direct detection curves are not fitted to data and retain predictive content.

Verdict: The central argument holds up under the stated assumptions. This paper deserves a serious referee. I would send it out and ask for the C_dark caveat to be explicit and, at minimum, an estimate of the loop contribution to chi-nucleon scattering.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone (pNG) dark matter model based on a gauged SU(2)_x and a softly broken global SU(2)_g symmetry, with a bi-fundamental scalar whose vacuum expectation value leaves a global U(1)_D stabilizing a complex pNG boson chi. Assuming all scalar-potential couplings are real, the model acquires a discrete C_dark symmetry, so the lighter of the vector V^0 and the CP-odd scalar a_0 is also stable. Under that assumption the paper presents a single-component scenario with only chi and two two-component scenarios (chi+V^0 and chi+a_0), computes relic abundances with micrOMEGAs, derives the tree-level suppression of chi-nucleon scattering, and shows rescaled direct-detection cross sections for V^0 and a_0 that can lie below current bounds and above the neutrino fog.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a concrete extension of pNG dark matter in which a naturally quiet pNG component is accompanied by a subdominant WIMP-like component whose effective direct-detection cross section is reduced by the number-density ratio. The tree-level derivation of the pNG momentum-transfer suppression in Eq. (4.1) is clean, the stability classification in Section 2.8 is internally consistent, and the use of micrOMEGAs and FeynRules makes the relic-density and scattering calculations reproducible in principle. The model also avoids the domain-wall problem and the Landau pole of some earlier pNG constructions. The main limitation is that the two-component phenomenology, which is the paper's most distinctive claim, rests on the additional assumption of exact real couplings, and the loop-level chi-nucleon cross section is not computed.

major comments (2)

[Section 2.4, Section 2.8, Eqs. (5.7) and (6.4)] The two-component scenarios require exact C_dark, but C_dark is introduced only under the ad hoc assumption that all scalar-potential parameters are real. The paper states 'we assume all the parameters in the scalar potential are real' without identifying a symmetry that enforces reality or a mechanism that protects it from radiative corrections. If a physical phase appears in mu_2^2, lambda_2, lambda_3, or tilde_lambda_2, C_dark is broken, V^0 and a_0 acquire decay channels into SM states, and the two-component direct-detection predictions in Figs. 9, 12, and 13 cease to apply. The authors should either demonstrate that exact CP can be consistently imposed and is radiatively stable, or present the two-component results as an explicit benchmark of a further assumption and estimate how small the CP-violating phases must be for V^0 or a_0 to remain cosmologically stable.
[Section 4.2, Figs. 9, 12, and 13] The total direct-detection rate in the two-component scenarios is not computed because the loop-induced chi-nucleon scattering cross section for this model is not presented. Section 4.2 only argues by analogy with other pNG models that the loop contribution should be small and leaves a dedicated calculation to future work. Since the headline claim is that the effective WIMP-nucleon cross section is above the neutrino fog, the pNG component could in principle contribute at a non-negligible level through loop effects. Without a calculation or a conservative upper bound demonstrating that the chi contribution is below the plotted V^0 or a_0 curves, Eqs. (5.7) and (6.4) do not by themselves determine the full observable scattering rate.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (3.21)] The expression containing '72 lambda_H (lambda_1 + lambda_3 + 72 lambda_4)' appears to have a typo in the last term; please check whether '72 lambda_4' should be a different combination of quartic couplings.
[Appendix C, Eq. (C.6)] The definition of O_- contains apparent misprints: the terms 'phi_2 phi_1' and 'phi_3 phi_4' should likely read 'phi_2 rho_1' and 'phi_3 rho_4'.
[Section 5.1, Eq. (5.2)] The variable x appears in Eq. (5.2) without a definition; in the relic-density context it should be defined, for example as x = m_chi/T.
[Section 3.1] The bounds on sin(theta_h) quoted from ATLAS and CMS are given for benchmark fits but the text does not state whether the combined ATLAS+CMS fit is used; please clarify which single-experiment or combined result is used in the plots.
[General] The phrase 'predicts WIMP-nucleon scattering cross sections that are smaller than the current upper bound but above the neutrino fog' in the Introduction is stronger than the body supports, since the two-component curves are valid only under the real-coupling assumption and for the benchmark parameter choices; consider softening the wording to 'can give' or 'in benchmark regions.'

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Central direct-detection predictions are independent and not fitted to DD data; only the abstract's claim that the relic abundance 'explains the measured value' is by construction because vs is tuned to Ωh²=0.120.

fitted input called prediction [Abstract; Sec. 2.7 'Model parameters'; Fig. 2 caption]
"We find that the relic abundance of the DM candidates explains the measured value of the DM energy density. ... In the following analysis, we determined vs to obtain the measured value of the DM energy density, Ω DMh2 = 0 .120 ± 0.001 [1], by the freeze-out mechanism."

The abstract presents the matching of the relic abundance to the measured dark-matter energy density as a 'find[ing]' of the model, but Section 2.7 states the model parameter vs is determined precisely so that Ωχ+χ̄h² + ΩV0h² = 0.12 (or the analogous single/two-component sum). Every plotted curve that 'reproduces the measured value' is therefore a contour of the chosen input vs, not an independent prediction. This is a genuine but minor overstatement: it does not make the headline direct-detection results circular, because the V0/a0 cross sections in eqs. (5.7) and (6.4) are computed from the resulting Ωi/ΩDM ratios and compared with LZ/XENONnT/DARWIN limits, which are not used as inputs.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claims are the effective spin-independent cross sections in the two-component scenarios, eqs. (5.7) and (6.4) and Figs. 9, 12, 13. Those quantities are outputs of the model: after fixing the dark VEV vs to the relic-density constraint (an openly stated procedure), the abundance ratios ΩV0/ΩDM and Ωa0/ΩDM are computed with micrOMEGAs, and the V0/a0-nucleon cross sections are calculated from the model's couplings, then rescaled by the standard multi-component density factor. No parameter is fitted to direct-detection data, so 'smaller than the current upper bound but above the neutrino fog' is a genuinely falsifiable prediction rather than a tautology. The only step that reduces by construction is the relic-abundance statement in the Abstract: since vs is chosen so that Ωh²=0.120, saying that the relic abundance 'explains the measured value' is describing an input condition, not a predicted outcome. This is a minor presentational circularity, not a defect in the central derivation. I found no load-bearing self-citation chain: the references to the authors' earlier models [17,19,20] are used for technical reductions (e.g., the form of Vsoft) and for comparative behavior, not to justify the unique prediction; and the discrete symmetry Cdark is explicitly introduced as an assumption ('we assume all the parameters in the scalar potential are real'), which is a model-building input, not a circular reuse of the conclusion. The loop-level pNG cross-section is honestly deferred to future work, so no circularity is hidden there. Overall, the direct-detection forecasts retain independent content; the score reflects only the fitted-input phrasing of the relic-abundance claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The model has nine free parameters beyond the measured v and m_h1. The dark VEV vs is tuned to reproduce the observed relic density, while all masses and mixing angles are scanned or fixed by hand. The analysis assumes freeze-out cosmology, exact C_dark from real couplings, tree-level gauge boson degeneracy, heavy CP-even mediators, and small loop-induced pNG scattering. The introduced particles have direct detection and annihilation handles, so they are not gratuitous entities, but the real-couplings assumption is an unenforced input.

free parameters (7)

v_s (dark sector VEV) = O(10-100 TeV), e.g. 3.75 TeV at benchmarks
Tuned via micrOMEGAs so that Omega_chi + Omega_V0/a0 h^2 = 0.120 (Section 2.7 and figures 2, 6, 10).
m_chi (pNG DM mass) = 0.6-3 TeV benchmarks
Scanned by hand; controls relic abundance and kinematic thresholds.
m_V (SU(2)x gauge boson mass) = benchmarks from 1.8 to 2.99 TeV, or mV = max(ma0 + 250 GeV, mchi + 50 GeV)
Chosen relative to mchi and ma0 to set which particle is stable.
m_a0 (CP-odd scalar mass) = examples ma0 = mV + 200 GeV, or mA0 values 0.5-3 TeV
Chosen relative to mV and mchi to realize the chi-a0 two-component scenario.
m_h2, m_h3 (heavy CP-even scalar masses) = e.g. (300, 400) GeV or (1000, 1200) GeV
Benchmark choices; they affect annihilation and direct detection through scalar mixing.
sin(theta_h) (Higgs portal mixing) = 0.15 or 0.02
Allowed by ATLAS and CMS Higgs coupling measurements (Section 3.1); controls dark matter coupling to SM fermions.
theta_1, theta_3 (scalar mixing angles) = 0.15
Fixed by hand; enter the scalar mass matrix and dark matter couplings.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Freeze-out cosmology and micrOMEGAs 6.0 correctly compute the multi-component thermal relic density including co-scattering and bouncing effects.
Used throughout Sections 4-6 to set vs and derive all abundance curves.
ad hoc to paper All scalar potential couplings are real, so C_dark is exact and stabilizes V0 or a0.
Stated in Section 2.4 and used in Section 2.8 for the two-component scenarios.
domain assumption All CP-even scalars are heavier than O(1) GeV, so the t to 0 approximation for pNG scattering is valid.
Footnote 3; a light mediator would revive unsuppressed chi-nucleon scattering.
domain assumption mV+ equals mV0 at tree level and the O(1) GeV one-loop mass difference is negligible for the TeV-scale masses studied.
Section 2.6 and appendix B; used to classify V0 stability and relic abundance.
ad hoc to paper Loop-induced pNG-nucleon scattering is small, as in other pNG models.
Section 4.2 final paragraph states 'we naively expect that the loop induced sigma_SI in this model is small' and defers a dedicated calculation.

invented entities (3)

Bi-fundamental scalar Phi and its excitations (chi, a0, sigma1, sigma2) independent evidence
purpose: Breaks SU(2)x x SU(2)g to U(1)D; provides the pNG DM chi and, in one scenario, the C_dark-stable scalar a0.
Predicts specific masses, couplings, annihilation rates and direct detection rates; the a0 channel gives cross sections above the neutrino fog in benchmark regions.
SU(2)x gauge bosons V+ and V0 independent evidence
purpose: Dark sector gauge force; V0 is a stable subdominant DM component in scenario 2, while V+ decays through chi hj.
The V0-nucleon effective cross section is computed and compared with LZ and DARWIN forecasts, so it is a falsifiable prediction; the V+ decay modes are specified.
pNG complex scalar chi (the dominant DM candidate) independent evidence
purpose: Dominant DM component protected by U(1)D; its annihilation is unsuppressed while its tree-level direct detection is momentum suppressed.
Its mass, spin, and couplings are fixed by the model, and its relic abundance is matched by tuning vs; the model gives definite predictions even though the loop-level scattering is not computed here.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tiny yet detectable WIMP-nucleon scattering cross sections in a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2TEOCXOC

@misc{pith2026241115755,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tiny yet detectable WIMP-nucleon scattering cross sections in a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2TEOCXOC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15755}
}

abstract

We investigate a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone (pNG) dark matter (DM) model based on a gauged $SU(2)_x$ and a global $SU(2)_g$ symmetries. These symmetries are spontaneously broken to a global $U(1)_D$ symmetry by a vacuum expectation value of an $SU(2)_x \times SU(2)_g$ bi-fundamental scalar field. The global $SU(2)_g$ symmetry is also softly broken to a global $U(1)_D$ symmetry. Under the setup, a complex pNG boson arises. It is stabilized by $U(1)_D$ and is a DM candidate. Its scattering cross section off a nucleon is highly suppressed by small momentum transfer and thus evades the stringent constraints from DM direct detection experiments. Assuming all the couplings in the dark sector are real, a discrete symmetry arises. Consequently, in addition to the pNG DM, the lighter one of an $SU(2)_x$ gauge boson $V^0$ and a CP-odd scalar boson $a_0$ from the bi-fundamental scalar field can also serve as a DM candidate. Therefore, the model provides two-component DM scenarios. We find that the relic abundance of the DM candidates explains the measured value of the DM energy density. We also find that the pNG DM is the dominant DM component in large regions of the parameter space. In contrast to the pNG DM, both $V^0$ and $a_0$ scatter off a nucleon, and their scattering cross sections are not suppressed. However, their scattering event rates are suppressed by their number densities. Thus, the scattering cross section is effectively reduced. We show that the effective WIMP-nucleon scattering cross sections in the two-component scenarios are smaller than the current upper bounds and above the neutrino fog.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

S-matrix bootstrap bounds on self-interacting dark matter
hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Weakly coupled scalar self-interacting dark matter cannot be heavier than ~0.3 GeV (generic) or ~MeV (derivative-coupled pNGB), much tighter than the 12 GeV unitarity bound.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[19]

Otsuka, T

H. Otsuka, T. Shimomura, K. Tsumura, Y. Uchida and N. Yamatsu, Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter from non-Abelian gauge symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 115033 [ 2210.08696]

arXiv 2022
[20]

T. Abe, Y. Hamada and K. Tsumura, A model of pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter with two complex scalars , JHEP 05 (2024) 076 [ 2401.02397]

arXiv 2024
[1]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ 1807.06209]

arXiv 2020
[2]

B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Cosmological Lower Bound on Heavy Neutrino Masses , Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 165

1977
[3]

XENON collaboration, First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 041003 [ 2303.14729]. – 32 –

arXiv 2023
[4]

PandaX collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne ·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, 2408.00664

arXiv
[5]

LZ Collaborationcollaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment , 2410.17036

arXiv
[6]

Gross, O

C. Gross, O. Lebedev and T. Toma, Cancellation Mechanism for Dark-Matter–Nucleon Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 191801 [ 1708.02253]

arXiv 2017

Show all 48 references

[7]

Balkin, M

R. Balkin, M. Ruhdorfer, E. Salvioni and A. Weiler, Dark matter shifts away from direct detection, JCAP 11 (2018) 050 [ 1809.09106]

2018 arXiv
[8]

Alanne, M

T. Alanne, M. Heikinheimo, V. Keus, N. Koivunen and K. Tuominen, Direct and indirect probes of Goldstone dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 075028 [ 1812.05996]

2019 arXiv
[9]

Karamitros, Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter: Examples of Vanishing Direct Detection Cross Section, Phys

D. Karamitros, Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone Dark Matter: Examples of Vanishing Direct Detection Cross Section, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 095036 [ 1901.09751]

2019 arXiv
[10]

Jiang, C

X.-M. Jiang, C. Cai, Z.-H. Yu, Y.-P. Zeng and H.-H. Zhang, Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter and two-Higgs-doublet models , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 075011 [ 1907.09684]

2019 arXiv
[11]

Y. Abe, T. Toma and K. Tsumura, Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter from gauged U (1)B−L symmetry, JHEP 05 (2020) 057 [ 2001.03954]

2020 arXiv
[12]

Okada, D

N. Okada, D. Raut and Q. Shafi, Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in a gauged B − L extended standard model, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 055024 [ 2001.05910]

2021 arXiv
[13]

Abe, G.-C

S. Abe, G.-C. Cho and K. Mawatari, Probing a degenerate-scalar scenario in a pseudoscalar dark-matter model, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 035023 [ 2101.04887]

2021 arXiv
[14]

Y. Abe, T. Toma, K. Tsumura and N. Yamatsu, Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter model inspired by grand unification , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 035011 [ 2104.13523]

2021 arXiv
[15]

Okada, D

N. Okada, D. Raut, Q. Shafi and A. Thapa, Pseudo-Goldstone dark matter in SO(10) , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 095002 [ 2105.03419]

2021 arXiv
[16]

Cai, Y.-P

C. Cai, Y.-P. Zeng and H.-H. Zhang, Cancellation mechanism of dark matter direct detection in Higgs-portal and vector-portal models , JHEP 01 (2022) 117 [ 2109.11499]

2022 arXiv
[17]

Abe and Y

T. Abe and Y. Hamada, A model of pseudo-Nambu–Goldstone dark matter from a softly broken SU(2) global symmetry with a U(1) gauge symmetry , PTEP 2023 (2023) 033B04 [2205.11919]

2023 arXiv
[18]

D.-Y. Liu, C. Cai, X.-M. Jiang, Z.-H. Yu and H.-H. Zhang, Ultraviolet completion of pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter with a hidden U(1) gauge symmetry , JHEP 02 (2023) 104 [2208.06653]

2023 arXiv
[21]

Biswas, V

S. Biswas, V. P. K. and A. Thapa, Connecting pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter with pseudo-Dirac neutrinos in a left-right symmetry model , 2407.05482

arXiv
[22]

ATLAS collaboration, A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery , Nature 607 (2022) 52 [ 2207.00092]. – 33 –

2022 arXiv
[23]

CMS collaboration, A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery., Nature 607 (2022) 60 [ 2207.00043]

2022 arXiv
[24]

ATLAS collaboration, Combination of searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson using 139 fb −1 of proton-proton collision data at s=13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment , Phys. Lett. B 842 (2023) 137963 [ 2301.10731]

2023 arXiv
[25]

CMS collaboration, A search for decays of the Higgs boson to invisible particles in events with a top-antitop quark pair or a vector boson in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 933 [ 2303.01214]

2023 arXiv
[26]

B. W. Lee, C. Quigg and H. B. Thacker, Weak Interactions at Very High-Energies: The Role of the Higgs Boson Mass , Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1519

1977
[27]

Alguero, G

G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml et al., micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter , Comput. Phys. Commun. 299 (2024) 109133 [2312.14894]

2024 arXiv
[28]

N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules - Feynman rules made easy , Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1614 [ 0806.4194]

2009 arXiv
[29]

Alloul, N

A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [ 1310.1921]

2014 arXiv
[30]

Abe and T

Y. Abe and T. Toma, Direct detection of pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter with light mediator, Phys. Lett. B 822 (2021) 136639 [ 2108.10647]

2021 arXiv
[31]

Ishiwata and T

K. Ishiwata and T. Toma, Probing pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson dark matter at loop level , JHEP 12 (2018) 089 [ 1810.08139]

2018 arXiv
[32]

Azevedo, M

D. Azevedo, M. Duch, B. Grzadkowski, D. Huang, M. Iglicki and R. Santos, One-loop contribution to dark-matter-nucleon scattering in the pseudo-scalar dark matter model , JHEP 01 (2019) 138 [ 1810.06105]

2019 arXiv
[33]

Glaus, M

S. Glaus, M. M¨ uhlleitner, J. M¨ uller, S. Patel, T. R¨ omer and R. Santos,Electroweak Corrections in a Pseudo-Nambu Goldstone Dark Matter Model Revisited , JHEP 12 (2020) 034 [2008.12985]

2020 arXiv
[34]

Biek¨ otter, P

T. Biek¨ otter, P. Gabriel, M. O. Olea-Romacho and R. Santos, Direct detection of pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter in a two Higgs doublet plus singlet extension of the SM, JHEP 10 (2022) 126 [ 2207.04973]

2022 arXiv
[35]

Cho and C

G.-C. Cho and C. Idegawa, Analyzing cancellation mechanism of the dark matter-quark scattering in a complex singlet extension of the Standard Model , Nucl. Phys. B 994 (2023) 116320 [2304.10096]

2023 arXiv
[36]

Cushman et al., Working Group Report: WIMP Dark Matter Direct Detection , in Snowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi , 10, 2013, 1310.8327

P. Cushman et al., Working Group Report: WIMP Dark Matter Direct Detection , in Snowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi , 10, 2013, 1310.8327

2013 arXiv
[37]

A. Katz, E. Salvioni and B. Shakya, Split SIMPs with Decays , JHEP 10 (2020) 049 [2006.15148]

2020 arXiv
[38]

S.-Y. Ho, P. Ko and C.-T. Lu, Scalar and fermion two-component SIMP dark matter with an accidental Z4 symmetry, JHEP 03 (2022) 005 [ 2201.06856]

2022 arXiv
[39]

Ho, An asymmetric SIMP dark matter model , JHEP 10 (2022) 182 [ 2207.13373]

S.-Y. Ho, An asymmetric SIMP dark matter model , JHEP 10 (2022) 182 [ 2207.13373]

2022 arXiv
[40]

Puetter, J

L. Puetter, J. T. Ruderman, E. Salvioni and B. Shakya, Bouncing dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 023032 [ 2208.08453]. – 34 –

2024 arXiv
[41]

D ´ ıaz S´ aez and P

B. D ´ ıaz S´ aez and P. E. Contreras,Bouncing pNGB dark matter via a fermion dark matter , JCAP 03 (2024) 010 [ 2307.07760]

2024 arXiv
[42]

Bhattacharya, A

S. Bhattacharya, A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski and J. Wudka, Two-Component Dark Matter , JHEP 10 (2013) 158 [ 1309.2986]

2013 arXiv
[43]

Abe and K

T. Abe and K. S. Babu, Simple Theory of Chiral Fermion Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 015031 [ 1912.11332]

2021 arXiv
[44]

DAR WINcollaboration, DAR WIN: towards the ultimate dark matter detector , JCAP 11 (2016) 017 [ 1606.07001]

2016 arXiv
[45]

XENON collaboration, Projected WIMP sensitivity of the XENONnT dark matter experiment, JCAP 11 (2020) 031 [ 2007.08796]

2020 arXiv
[46]

LZ collaboration, Projected WIMP sensitivity of the LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter experiment , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052002 [ 1802.06039]

2020 arXiv
[47]

Ohl, Drawing Feynman diagrams with Latex and Metafont , Comput

T. Ohl, Drawing Feynman diagrams with Latex and Metafont , Comput. Phys. Commun. 90 (1995) 340 [ hep-ph/9505351]

1995 arXiv
[48]

Hahn and M

T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118 (1999) 153 [ hep-ph/9807565]. – 35 –

1999 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [19]

Otsuka, T

H. Otsuka, T. Shimomura, K. Tsumura, Y. Uchida and N. Yamatsu, Pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter from non-Abelian gauge symmetry , Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 115033 [ 2210.08696]

arXiv 2022

[2] [20]

T. Abe, Y. Hamada and K. Tsumura, A model of pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone dark matter with two complex scalars , JHEP 05 (2024) 076 [ 2401.02397]

arXiv 2024

[3] [1]

Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ 1807.06209]

arXiv 2020

[4] [2]

B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Cosmological Lower Bound on Heavy Neutrino Masses , Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 165

1977

[5] [3]

XENON collaboration, First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 041003 [ 2303.14729]. – 32 –

arXiv 2023

[6] [4]

PandaX collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne ·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T, 2408.00664

arXiv

[7] [5]

LZ Collaborationcollaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment , 2410.17036

arXiv

[8] [6]

Gross, O

C. Gross, O. Lebedev and T. Toma, Cancellation Mechanism for Dark-Matter–Nucleon Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 191801 [ 1708.02253]

arXiv 2017