Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

The Fe-N system: crystal structure prediction, phase stability, and mechanical properties

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A variable-composition evolutionary search combined with density functional theory predicts 50 stable or metastable iron-nitrogen compounds, all ductile and all harder than pure iron, with hardness driven by short, strong Fe-N bonds.

desk verdict Useful Fe-N phase map and mechanical property survey, but the missing spin-polarization statement plus unexplained energy discrepancies in Table 1 make the 50-phase stability list provisional pending revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.17193 v1 pith:XO75GPDG submitted 2024-11-26 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Ergen Bao , Jinbin Zhao , Qiang Gao , Ijaz Shahid , Hui Ma , Yixiu Luo , Peitao Liu , Yan Sun
show 1 more author
Xing-Qiu Chen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ironnitridesfirst-principlescalculationscrystalstructurepredictionphasestabilitymechanicalpropertiesVickershardnessconvexhullnitriding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to map the iron-nitrogen system across many compositions, not just the few nitride phases known from steel nitriding. It combines an evolutionary structure search with density functional theory and finds 50 iron-nitride compounds that pass thermodynamic, mechanical, and dynamical stability checks. It then computes their elastic moduli, ductility indicators, and Vickers hardness. The paper's central claim is that all 50 compounds are ductile, that bulk modulus rises with nitrogen content, and that hardness spans 3.5 to 10.5 GPa, well above the 2.0 GPa of pure iron, because Fe-N bonds are shorter and stronger than Fe-Fe bonds. If correct, this gives a broad compositional map for designing nitrided steels with tailored surface stiffness and hardness.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a three-stage stability filter. First, a variable-composition evolutionary search generates thousands of candidate Fe-N structures, and thermodynamic selection keeps structures with negative formation energies or energies above the convex hull below 0.075 eV/atom. Second, elastic constants computed by the stress-strain method enforce mechanical stability. Third, phonon calculations require the absence of imaginary frequencies for dynamical stability. For hardness, the paper uses a semi-empirical microscopic model that feeds valence-electron density, bond ionicity, and metallicity from the electronic structure into a Vickers hardness formula, validated against measured hardness of known nitrides; bond strength is then quantified with integrated crystal orbital Hamilton population values. The Fe-N bond itself is the load-bearing object: its shortness and strength are what push hardness above that of pure iron.

What would settle it

Recompute the formation energies and convex hull of the Fe-N system with spin-polarized density functional theory, checking Fe8N (I4/mmm) in particular; if the reported -0.029 eV/atom moves substantially or the hull ranking changes, the stable-versus-metastable classification would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a computed phase map of the Fe-N binary: two ground-state compounds, FeN (space group F-43m) and Fe3N (P6322), plus 48 metastable phases with energies above the convex hull below 0.075 eV/atom, all of which also satisfy elastic stability and phonon stability. Across this map every compound lies in the ductile region by Pugh's ratio, most show near-isotropic metallic bonding, and bulk modulus generally increases as nitrogen concentration rises. Predicted Vickers hardness ranges from 3.5 to 10.5 GPa, compared with 2.0 GPa for pure iron; the hardest phases, FeN, Fe4N, Fe16N, and Fe3N, have the shortest Fe-N bonds, the largest overlap populations, and the lowest density of states at the Fermi level. Bond-strength analysis via crystal orbital Hamilton populations shows Fe-N bonds are stronger than the Fe-Fe bonds in pure iron, which the authors take as the microscopic reason nitrogen raises hardness.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the density-functional calculations correctly describe iron's magnetism in these compounds; if the magnetic ordering were wrong, the formation energies and therefore the list of stable and metastable phases could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nitriding a steel surface should raise its hardness from about 2 GPa to at least 3.5 GPa, and up to 10.5 GPa depending on which Fe-N phase forms.
  • Because every predicted Fe-N phase is ductile, adding nitrogen should stiffen and harden the surface without making it brittle, a useful combination for wear-resistant steels.
  • The 48 metastable phases, several with energies very close to the convex hull, are concrete candidates for synthesis by high-pressure, thin-film, or other non-equilibrium routes.
  • Compositions with more than 50 percent nitrogen are predicted to be thermodynamically unstable at ambient conditions, so very nitrogen-rich surface layers would require non-equilibrium processing.
  • The hardness ranking identifies FeN, Fe4N, Fe16N, and one Fe3N polymorph as the hardest targets, worth prioritizing in experimental efforts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this phase map is representative, the same evolutionary-search-plus-DFT pipeline could be applied to other transition-metal nitride binaries; the observed trend of rising hardness and bulk modulus with nitrogen content, while ductility is retained, may be a general design rule rather than an Fe-N peculiarity.
  • The predicted metastable phases could serve as a direct search list for reactive sputtering or pulsed-laser deposition experiments; finding even one of the new low-energy phases, such as Fe16N in Fmmm, would test the map's ranking.
  • Because the hardness model relies on bond length, overlap population, and Fermi-level density of states, these three descriptors could be used as a fast screening metric for nitride precipitates at steel grain boundaries, not just for bulk phases.
  • A finite-temperature extension including vibrational free energies and magnetic disorder could shift the convex hull; the room-temperature set of stable phases may differ from the 0 K map presented here, especially for the near-hull metastable candidates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a high-throughput crystal-structure prediction study of the binary Fe-N system using the USPEX evolutionary algorithm combined with DFT (GGA-PBE). From more than 8400 generated structures, the authors construct a formation-energy convex hull, apply thermodynamic (negative formation energy or energy above hull < 0.075 eV/atom), mechanical (elastic-constant Born criteria), and dynamic (phonon) stability filters, and obtain 50 stable or metastable Fe-N phases. For these phases they compute elastic moduli, Poisson's ratio, Pugh's ratio, Cauchy pressure, Kleinman's parameter, universal anisotropy, Debye temperature, and Vickers hardness using Guo's semi-empirical model. The central claims are that only FeN and Fe3N lie on the computed convex hull, that all 50 identified phases are ductile, and that their Vickers hardness values (3.5-10.5 GPa) are significantly higher than that of pure Fe (2.0 GPa) due to stronger Fe-N bonds.

Significance. If the phase-stability predictions are correct, the paper provides a useful compositional map of Fe-N compounds with computed mechanical properties, which is relevant for understanding nitriding and for designing Fe-N alloys. The strengths of the study are its systematic screening pipeline, the inclusion of phonon and elastic-stability checks, the public provision of structural data in the supplementary material, and the external validation of several calculated properties against experimental values for known phases (e.g., bulk modulus of gamma'-Fe4N, hardness of epsilon-Fe3N). The hardness model is adopted from the literature and not fitted to the authors' own data, which is methodologically clean. However, the central stability claim rests on DFT formation energies whose magnetic treatment is not documented, and the paper acknowledges but does not reconcile a large discrepancy with a previous calculation for Fe8N. These issues make the reported set of 50 phases and the derived property trends uncertain.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2 (Calculation details)] The manuscript specifies the exchange-correlation functional, PAW potentials, cutoff, smearing, and k-point resolution, but never states whether the calculations are spin-polarized, which magnetic orderings were considered, or how initial magnetic moments were set. Fe and iron nitrides are magnetic, and the energy differences that decide the convex hull are tens of meV/atom. A nonmagnetic or incorrectly magnetized treatment can shift formation energies by hundreds of meV/atom, directly changing which phases are classified as stable or metastable. This is load-bearing for the central 50-phase claim. Please state the ISPIN and MAGMOM settings used in VASP, verify that bcc Fe relaxes to the ferromagnetic state with the correct magnetic moment, and repeat the hull construction for spin-polarized calculations; if such calculations were already performed, the paper must say so explicitly.
  2. [Table 1, Section 3.1] For Fe8N in the I4/mmm structure, the paper reports a formation energy of -0.029 eV/atom, while the cited calculation [42] gives -0.224 eV/atom for the same composition and structure. This 0.195 eV/atom discrepancy is roughly three times the 0.075 eV/atom metastability cutoff used to define the 50-phase set. In addition, gamma'-Fe4N, a well-known experimentally stable phase, is reported 0.020 eV/atom above the hull, yet the text does not discuss this inconsistency. The manuscript must reconcile the Fe8N discrepancy—for example, by checking the magnetic state, pseudopotentials, or reference energies—and should discuss why a common stable phase appears slightly metastable on the computed hull. Without this reconciliation, the thermodynamic-stability filter and the resulting phase list are not robust.
  3. [Section 3.1 (metastability criterion)] The metastability cutoff of 0.075 eV/atom is adopted from refs [34,35] and is not justified for the Fe-N system. Since magnetic effects and the Fe8N discrepancy can move formation energies by amounts comparable to or larger than this cuttoff, the reported count of '50 thermodynamically stable or metastable' phases is sensitive to both the magnetic treatment and the chosen cutoff. Please provide a sensitivity analysis showing how the number and composition of the predicted phases change when the cutoff is varied (e.g., 0.05, 0.075, 0.10 eV/atom), and explicitly connect this to the spin-polarized energy landscape.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3.2] The term 'Klemen parameters' should be 'Kleinman's parameters'. The same typo appears in the abstract and in Section 3.2.
  2. [Table 2] The row labeled 'MAS' should be 'MAE' (mean absolute error), consistent with the text and the earlier definition in Section 3.3.
  3. [Reference [40]] Reference [40] includes the DOI '10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118064', which appears to belong to a different article; the citation details for the Fe16N2 structure determination by Toda et al. should be corrected.
  4. [Section 3.3, hardness comparison] The sentence listing the lowest hardness values says 'Fe7N3 (P63), Fe4N (Pmna), Fe9N2 (C2/m), and Fe4N (Fmmm) exhibit the lowest predicted hardness values (3.59, 3.71 and 4.08 GPa, respectively)' but gives only three values for four phases. Please correct the list or the values.
  5. [Section 3.2, Debye temperature discussion] The text states that FeN, Fe2N, and Fe8N3 'exhibit the highest thermal conductivities' based on Debye temperatures. Debye temperature is not equivalent to thermal conductivity; the wording should be changed to say these materials have the highest Debye temperatures, which can correlate with thermal conductivity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central DFT/structure-prediction pipeline is self-contained, and the only self-citations appear in non-load-bearing hardness-model comparisons.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—the identification of 50 stable or metastable Fe–N phases and their elastic, dynamic, and hardness trends—are produced by a self-contained computational pipeline: USPEX evolutionary search, VASP/PBE relaxation, formation energies from Eq. (6) referenced to elemental Fe and N2, convex-hull analysis, elastic-constant screening, and phonopy DFPT phonon calculations. None of these steps fits a parameter to the authors' own data, and none defines the target result in terms of itself. The hardness predictions use the externally published Guo model (Eq. (7)), whose coefficients are fixed in the literature; the paper validates Guo's model against experimental hardness for ε-Fe3N, γ'-Fe4N, and Fe8N in Table 2, which is an external benchmark, not a fitted input. The only apparent self-citations are the Chen ([49]) and Zhao ([50]) macroscopic hardness models, both used in the same validation table as comparison references; the reported hardness values for the 50 compounds are computed with Guo's model, so these self-citations are not load-bearing. A separate concern—that spin polarization is not documented and that the Fe8N formation energy differs by 0.195 eV/atom from ref. [42]—bears on the correctness and robustness of the DFT energetics, but it is not a circularity of the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DFT approximations, the completeness of the evolutionary search, an unstated treatment of magnetism, and an externally fitted hardness model. The only hand-chosen numerical threshold is the metastability cutoff of 0.075 eV/atom. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • metastability energy cutoff = 0.075 eV/atom
    Chosen to define metastable phases; determines which of the 60 candidates become the 50 reported phases. No sensitivity analysis is provided.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption DFT-PBE accurately describes Fe-N energetics, elasticity, and stability at 0 K and ambient pressure
    Section 2 uses PBE functional; PBE is a standard approximation but is not guaranteed to capture magnetic and van der Waals effects correctly; the paper does not benchmark against higher-level methods or experiments for all phases.
  • domain assumption The USPEX search is sufficiently exhaustive to find all relevant low-energy structures up to 21 atoms/cell
    Section 2: search limited to 21 atoms/cell; the known Fe12N5 (34-atom primitive cell) was missed, showing incompleteness. This affects the convex hull and metastability assignments.
  • domain assumption Magnetic ordering either does not affect the results or is correctly captured by the unspecified DFT settings
    Section 2 does not mention spin polarization; Fe and Fe-N are magnetic, so this is load-bearing.
  • domain assumption Guo's hardness model applies to Fe-N phases beyond the three validation compounds
    Section 3.3 uses Guo's semi-empirical formula for all 50 phases after validation on only Fe3N, Fe4N, and Fe8N; extrapolation to the full set is assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Fe-N system: crystal structure prediction, phase stability, and mechanical properties." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XO75GPDG

@misc{pith2026241117193,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Fe-N system: crystal structure prediction, phase stability, and mechanical properties},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XO75GPDG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.17193}
}
read the original abstract

Nitriding introduces nitrides into the surface of steels, significantly enhancing the surface me-chanical properties. By combining the variable composition evolutionary algorithm and first-principles calculations based on density functional theory, 50 thermodynamically stable or metastable Fe-N compounds with various stoichiometric ratios were identified, exhibiting also dynamic and mechanical stability. The mechanical properties of these structures were systemati-cally studied, including the bulk modulus, shear modulus, Young's modulus, Poisson's ratio, Pugh's ratio, Cauchy pressure, Klemen parameters, universal elastic anisotropy, Debye tempera-ture, and Vickers hardness. All identified stable and metastable Fe-N compounds were found in the ductile region, with most exhibiting homogeneous elastic properties and isotropic metallic bonding. As the nitrogen concentration increases, their bulk moduli generally increase as well. The Vickers hardness values of Fe-N compounds range from 3.5 to 10.5 GPa, which are signifi-cantly higher than that of pure Fe (2.0 GPa), due to the stronger Fe-N bonds strength. This study provides insights into optimizing and designing Fe-N alloys with tailored mechanical properties.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Data-driven high-throughput search for the accelerated discovery of rare-earth-free permanent magnets

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A computational screen identifies tetragonal ZnFe and Fe8N as stable, high-magnetization, high-curie-temperature candidates for rare-earth-free permanent magnets.

  2. Unveiling potential candidates for rare-earth-free permanent magnet and magnetocaloric effect applications: a high throughput screening in Fe-N alloys

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A DFT high-throughput screen of 49 ferromagnetic Fe-N compounds finds 15 permanent-magnet candidates with anisotropy above 0.4 MJ/m3 and 41 potential magnetocaloric alloys.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [42]

    Shi, Y.L

    Y.J. Shi, Y.L. Du, G. Chen, First-principles study on electronic structure and elastic properties of Fe16N2, Physica B. 407 (2012) 3423-3426, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2012.04.051

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physb.2012.04.051 2012

  2. [1]

    Torchane, P

    L. Torchane, P. Bilger, J. Dulcy, M. Gantois, Control of iron nitride layers growth kinetics in the binary Fe-N system, Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 27 (1996) 1823-1835, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651932

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02651932 1996

  3. [2]

    Somers, E.J

    M.A. Somers, E.J. Mittemeijer, Layer-growth kinetics on gaseous nitriding of pure iron: Evaluation of diffusion coefficients for nitrogen in iron nitrides, Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 26 (1995) 57-74, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02669794

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02669794 1995

  4. [3]

    Weber, L

    T. Weber, L. De Wit, F.W. Saris, A. Königer, B. Rauschenbach, G.K. Wolf, S. Krauss, Hardness and corrosion resistance of single-phase nitride and carbide on iron, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 199 (1995) 205-210, https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(94)09729-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0921-5093(94)09729-1 1995

  5. [4]

    Tessier, A

    F. Tessier, A. Navrotsky, R. Niewa, A. Leineweber, H. Jacobs, S. Kikkawa, M. Takahashi, F. Kanamaru, F.J. DiSalvo, Energetics of binary iron nitrides, Solid State Sci. 2 (2000) 457-462, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1293- 2558(00)00151-5

    doi:10.1016/s1293- 2000

  6. [5]

    Takahashi, J

    T. Takahashi, J. Burghaus, D. Music, R. Dronskowski, J.M. Schneider, Elastic properties of γ′-Fe4N probed by nanoindentation and ab initio calculation, Acta Mater. 60 (2012) 2054-2060, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.051

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.051 2012

  7. [6]

    Zhang, Z.Q

    W.H. Zhang, Z.Q. Lv, Z.P. Shi, S.H. Sun, Z.H. Wang, W.T. Fu, Electronic, magnetic and elastic properties of ε-phases Fe3X (X= B, C, N) from density-functional theory calculations, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324 (2012) 2271-2276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.02.114

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.02.114 2012

  8. [7]

    J. Chen, C. Yu, H. Lu, Phase stability, magnetism, elastic properties and hardness of binary iron nitrides from first principles, J. Alloys Compd. 625 (2015) 224-230, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.130

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.130 2015

Show all 57 references
  1. [8]

    Gao, Theoretical model of intrinsic hardness, Phys

    F. Gao, Theoretical model of intrinsic hardness, Phys. Rev. B. 73 (2006) 132104, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.132104, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.132104

    2006 doi

  2. [9]

    Haines, J.M

    J. Haines, J.M. Leger, G. Bocquillon, Synthesis and design of superhard materials, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 31 (2001) 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.1

    2001 doi

  3. [10]

    Glass, A.R

    C.W. Glass, A.R. Oganov, N. Hansen, USPEX— Evolutionary crystal structure prediction, Comput. Phys. Commun. 175 (2006) 713-720, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2006.07.020

    2006 doi

  4. [11]

    X. Guo, L. Li, Z. Liu, D. Yu, J. He, R. Liu, B. Xu, Y. Tian, H. Wang, Hardness of covalent compounds: Roles of metallic component and d valence electrons, J. Appl. Phys. 104 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2956594

    2008 doi

  5. [12]

    Oganov, A.O

    A.R. Oganov, A.O. Lyakhov, M. Valle, How Evolutionary Crystal Structure Prediction Works-and Why, Acc. Chem. Res. 44 (2011) 227-237, https://doi.org/10.1021/ar1001318

    2011 doi

  6. [13]

    Lyakhov, A.R

    A.O. Lyakhov, A.R. Oganov, H.T. Stokes, Q. Zhu, New developments in evolutionary structure prediction algorithm USPEX, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1172-1182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.12.009

    2013 doi

  7. [14]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for open-shell transition metals, Phys. Rev. B. 48 (1993) 13115, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.13115

    1993 doi

  8. [15]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B. 54 (1996) 11169, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169

    1996 doi

  9. [16]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6 (1996) 15-50, https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0

    1996 doi

  10. [17]

    Perdew, K

    J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    1996 doi

  11. [18]

    Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys

    P.E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B. 50 (1994) 17953, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953

    1994 doi

  12. [19]

    Kresse, D

    G. Kresse, D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B. 59 (1999) 1758, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758

    1999 doi

  13. [20]

    Methfessel, A.T

    M. Methfessel, A.T. Paxton, High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals, Phys. Rev. B. 40 (1989) 3616, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616

    1989 doi

  14. [21]

    V. Wang, N. Xu, J. Liu, G. Tang, W. Geng, VASPKIT: A user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code, Comput. Phys. Commun. 267 (2021) 108033, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108033

    2021

  15. [22]

    Monkhorst, J.D

    H.J. Monkhorst, J.D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B. 13 (1976) 5188, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188

    1976 doi

  16. [23]

    Voigt, Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik, Teubner Verlag, 1928

    W. Voigt, Lehrbuch der Kristallphysik, Teubner Verlag, 1928

    1928

  17. [24]

    Hill, The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate, Proc

    R. Hill, The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate, Proc. Phys. Soc. A. 65 (1952) 349

    1952

  18. [25]

    Reuss, Berechnung der fließgrenze von mischkristallen auf grund der plastizitätsbedingung für einkristalle., Z

    A. Reuss, Berechnung der fließgrenze von mischkristallen auf grund der plastizitätsbedingung für einkristalle., Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 9 (1929) 49-58, https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19290090104

    1929 doi

  19. [26]

    Kleinman, Deformation potentials in silicon

    L. Kleinman, Deformation potentials in silicon. I. Uniaxial strain, Phys. Rev. 128 (1962) 2614, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.128.2614

    1962 doi

  20. [27]

    Anderson, A simplified method for calculating the Debye temperature from elastic constants, J

    O.L. Anderson, A simplified method for calculating the Debye temperature from elastic constants, J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 24 (1963) 909-917, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(63)90067-2

    1963 doi

  21. [28]

    A. Togo, L. Chaput, T. Tadano, I. Tanaka, Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 35 (2023) 353001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/acd831

    2023 doi

  22. [29]

    Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J

    A. Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92 (2023) 012001, https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.92.012001

    2023 doi

  23. [30]

    Blöchl, O

    P.E. Blöchl, O. Jepsen, O.K. Andersen, Improved tetrahedron method for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B. 49 (1994) 16223, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.16223

    1994 doi

  24. [31]

    Clark, M.D

    S.J. Clark, M.D. Segall, C.J. Pickard, P.J. Hasnip, M.I. Probert, K. Refson, M.C. Payne, First principles methods using CASTEP, Z. Krist. - Cryst. Mater. 220 (2005) 567-570, https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075

    2005 doi

  25. [32]

    Nelson, C

    R. Nelson, C. Ertural, J. George, V.L. Deringer, G. Hautier, R. Dronskowski, LOBSTER: Local orbital projections, atomic charges, and chemical‐bonding analysis from projector‐augmented‐wave‐based density‐functional theory, J. Comput. Chem. 41 (2020) 1931-1940, https://doi.org/1...

    2020 doi

  26. [33]

    Dronskowski, P.E

    R. Dronskowski, P.E. Blöchl, Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density-functional calculations, J. Phys. Chem. 97 (1993) 8617-8624, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100135a014

    1993 doi

  27. [34]

    Taylor, S

    R.H. Taylor, S. Curtarolo, G.L. Hart, Guiding the experimental discovery of magnesium alloys, Phys. Rev. B. 84 (2011) 084101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.084101

    2011 doi

  28. [35]

    D. Liu, X. Dai, X. Wen, G. Qin, X. Meng, Predictions on the compositions, structures, and mechanical properties of intermediate phases in binary Mg–X (X= Sn, Y, Sc, Ag) alloys, Comput. Mater. Sci. 106 (2015) 180-187, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.04.038

    2015 doi

  29. [36]

    Mouhat, F

    F. Mouhat, F. Coudert, Necessary and sufficient elastic stability conditions in various crystal systems, Phys. Rev. B. 90 (2014) 224104, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.224104

    2014 doi

  30. [37]

    Suzuki, H

    K. Suzuki, H. Morita, T. Kaneko, H. Yoshida, H. Fujimori, Crystal structure and magnetic properties of the compound FeN, J. Alloys Compd. 201 (1993) 11-16, https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8388(93)90854-G

    1993 doi

  31. [38]

    Jack, The iron-nitrogen system: the structures of Fe4N and Fe2N, Proc

    K.H. Jack, The iron-nitrogen system: the structures of Fe4N and Fe2N, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 795 (1948) 34-40, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0100

    1948

  32. [39]

    Jacobs, D

    H. Jacobs, D. Rechenbach, U. Zachwieja, Structure determination of γ′-Fe4N and ε-Fe3N, J. Alloys Compd. 227 (1995) 10-17, https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8388(95)01610-4

    1995 doi

  33. [40]

    K. Toda, M. Honda, Y. Orihara, M. Sato, F. Kanamaru, Crystal Structure of Fe16N2, Key Eng. Mater. 181-182 (2000) 213-216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118064

    2000

  34. [41]

    Kuhnen, A.V

    C.A. Kuhnen, A.V. Dos Santos, Ground-state and thermal properties of substituted iron nitrides, J. Alloys Compd. 297 (2000) 68-72, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(99)00532-0

    2000 doi

  35. [43]

    Rayne, B.S

    J.A. Rayne, B.S. Chandrasekhar, Elastic constants of iron from 4.2 to 300 K, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 1714, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.122.1714

    1961 doi

  36. [44]

    Pugh, XCII

    S.F. Pugh, XCII. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals, Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 45 (1954) 823-843, https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440808520496

    1954 doi

  37. [45]

    Pettifor, Theoretical predictions of structure and related properties of intermetallics, Mater

    D.G. Pettifor, Theoretical predictions of structure and related properties of intermetallics, Mater. Sci. Technol. 8 (1992) 345-349, https://doi.org/10.1179/mst.1992.8.4.345

    1992 doi

  38. [46]

    Panda, K.R

    K.B. Panda, K.R. Chandran, First principles determination of elastic constants and chemical bonding of titanium boride (TiB) on the basis of density functional theory, Acta Mater. 54 (2006) 1641-1657, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.003

    2006 doi

  39. [47]

    S. Jhi, J. Ihm, S.G. Louie, M.L. Cohen, Electronic mechanism of hardness enhancement in transition-metal carbonitrides, Nat. 399 (1999) 132-134, https://doi.org/10.1038/20148

    1999 doi

  40. [48]

    F. Gao, J. He, E. Wu, S. Liu, D. Yu, D. Li, S. Zhang, Y. Tian, Hardness of covalent crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 015502, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.015502

    2003 doi

  41. [49]

    X. Chen, H. Niu, D. Li, Y. Li, Modeling hardness of polycrystalline materials and bulk metallic glasses, Intermetallics. 19 (2011) 1275-1281, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2011.03.026

    2011 doi

  42. [50]

    J. Zhao, P. Liu, J. Wang, J. Li, H. Niu, Y. Sun, J. Li, X. Chen, Hardness and fracture toughness models by symbolic regression, Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 138 (2023) 643, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04273-x

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    Y. Tian, B. Xu, Z. Zhao, Microscopic theory of hardness and design of novel superhard crystals, Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 33 (2012) 93-106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2012.02.021

    2012 doi

  44. [52]

    Teter, Computational alchemy: the search for new superhard materials, MRS Bull

    D.M. Teter, Computational alchemy: the search for new superhard materials, MRS Bull. 23 (1998) 22-27, https://doi.org/10.1557/S0883769400031420

    1998 doi

  45. [53]

    Alvarez-Fregoso, J.A

    O. Alvarez-Fregoso, J.A. Chávez-Carvayar, J.A. Juárez-Islas, E. Camps, J.L. García, FeN and FeN-H thin films prepared by ECR microwave plasma nitriding, Surf. Coat. Technol. 94 (1997) 255-260, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00455-6

    1997 doi

  46. [54]

    W. Yin, L. Lei, X. Jiang, P. Liu, F. Liu, Y. Li, F. Peng, D. He, High pressure synthesis and properties studies on spherical bulk ε-Fe3N, High Press. Res. 34 (2014) 317-326, https://doi.org/10.1080/08957959.2014.944910

    2014

  47. [55]

    Kano, N.S

    A. Kano, N.S. Kazama, H. Fujimori, T. Takahashi, Metastable Fe nitrides with high Bs prepared by reactive sputtering, J. Appl. Phys. 53 (1982) 8332-8334, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.330356

    1982 doi

  48. [56]

    Jiang, C.Q

    E.Y. Jiang, C.Q. Sun, J.E. Li, Y.G. Liu, The structures and magnetic properties of FeN films prepared by the facing targets sputtering method, J. Appl. Phys. 65 (1988) 1659-1663, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.342934

    1988 doi

  49. [57]

    Silvi, A

    B. Silvi, A. Savin, Classification of chemical bonds based on topological analysis of electron localization functions, Nat. 371 (1994) 683-686, https://doi.org/10.1038/371683a0

    1994 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.