Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Charged Rotating Hairy Black Holes in AdS$_5 \times S^5$: Unveiling their Secrets

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the supersymmetric limit of rotating charged hairy black holes in AdS$_5\times S^5$ is singular: entropy vanishes, the scalar field diverges at the horizon, and no new regular two-parameter BPS family exists.

desk verdict A careful, probably-correct negative result on the BPS limit of hairy AdS5 black holes; the central claim rests on an acknowledged numerical extrapolation, but the paper is honest about exactly that. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.18712 v1 pith:PE3AFOE5 submitted 2024-11-27 hep-th gr-qc

Oscar J.C. Dias , Prahar Mitra , Jorge E. Santos This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords hairyblackholesAdS5/CFT4gaugedsupergravityBPSlimitscalarcondensationinstabilitymicrocanonicalensembleGutowski-Reallholenear-horizonequations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper revisits a long-standing puzzle in holography: whether the known one-parameter family of supersymmetric black holes in AdS$_5\times S^5$ (the Gutowski-Reall family) can be extended by adding scalar hair into a two-parameter family. Earlier work conjectured that such a regular two-parameter family exists, citing a thermodynamic model and numerical solutions that seemed to approach finite entropy as the temperature dropped. The authors construct the hairy black holes both in matched perturbation theory and by direct numerical solution, pushing the temperature down to $T L\sim 10^{-7}$, about four orders of magnitude colder than earlier studies. Their central claim is that the BPS limit of these hairy black holes is singular: the entropy goes to zero while the charged scalar and curvature invariants diverge at the horizon, contradicting the earlier conjecture. If correct, the gravitational phase space near the BPS bound does not contain a new regular hairy family, and the one-parameter Gutowski-Reall solution remains the only regular supersymmetric black hole in this sector.

What carries the argument

The main machinery is a matched asymptotic expansion with three overlapping regions (far, intermediate, near) that constructs hairy black holes in a double expansion in horizon radius and scalar condensate, cross-checked against direct numerical integration down to $T L\sim 10^{-7}$. On the BPS side the decisive object is the near-horizon analysis of the BPS equations in the coordinates (7.3)--(7.5): using the monotonicity theorem that $f'=o(g')$ implies $f$ is either a constant plus $o(g-g(0))$ or $o(g)$, the authors show a regular horizon forces the charged scalar to vanish identically, which would reduce the theory to the bald Gutowski-Reall solution.

What would settle it

A regular solution of the BPS equations with a smooth horizon, finite entropy, finite scalar field, and $\Delta_{\rm KLR}\neq 0$ would refute the claim; so would numerical detection of a new finite-entropy branch below $T L\sim 10^{-7}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the equal-charge, equal-angular-momentum sector of $U(1)^3$ gauged supergravity, the paper finds that as the mass approaches the BPS bound $E = 3Q + 2J/L$, the hairy black hole reaches $T\to 0$, $\mu\to 1$, and $\Omega_H L\to 1$, but its entropy vanishes and the scalar field at the horizon diverges, so curvature invariants diverge there. The BPS limit is therefore a singular, horizonless configuration rather than a new two-parameter family of regular supersymmetric black holes with $\Delta_{\rm KLR}\neq 0$. This directly contradicts the conjectures based on the non-interacting thermodynamic model and on previous numerical data that had only reached $T L\sim 10^{-3}$. Three independent routes support the conclusion: a perturbative construction whose regime of validity is shown to break down precisely near the BPS surface, an improved numerical analysis at much lower temperature, and a near-horizon study of the BPS equations that finds no regular solution with finite scalar and finite horizon entropy.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the numerical family seen at $T L\sim 10^{-7}$ continues all the way to $T=0$ with nothing new appearing in between; if a colder branch with finite entropy existed, the central claim would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Where hairy and CLP black holes coexist at fixed energy, charge, and angular momentum, the hairy black holes have larger entropy; if the central claim holds, they are the dominant microcanonical phase and describe a new thermodynamic phase of ${\cal N}=4$ SYM.
  • The BPS surface is not a new branch of regular solutions: the one-parameter Gutowski-Reall family remains the only regular supersymmetric black hole in this sector, and the proposed missing gravitational parameter is not scalar hair.
  • The non-interacting thermodynamic model and the perturbative expansions are excellent away from the BPS surface but fail extremely close to it; their finite-entropy prediction at $T=0$ is an artifact of the expansion.
  • Earlier low-temperature data stopping at $T L\sim 10^{-3}$ were insufficient: the entropy curve changes slope and plunges to zero only below that range.
  • Because the scalar field diverges at the horizon in the BPS limit, the limiting configuration cannot serve as a regular endpoint in the AdS/CFT phase diagram, so other solutions are needed in parts of the phase diagram where CLP black holes do not exist.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the scalar-condensation channel cannot produce a regular BPS family, the natural candidates to fill the missing region of the phase diagram are the time-periodic black resonators and the graviton-gas/dual-giant endpoints discussed in the paper; the singular-limit result sharpens the case for those alternatives.
  • The near-horizon BPS analysis leaves open a scalar that diverges while oscillating infinitely often (for example like $x^{-1}\sin(1/x)$); testing whether such exotic solutions exist is a concrete next step beyond this paper.
  • The no-go is proven only for the equal-charge, equal-spin sector; an immediate extension would be to repeat the low-temperature numerical analysis for unequal charges or angular momenta, where a regular two-parameter BPS family could still hide.
  • The authors note they have not checked stability against condensation of the remaining scalar fields that were set to zero; if those channels become unstable at very low temperature, the true endpoint could differ from the singular branch studied here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies charged rotating hairy black holes in the S^3-invariant sector of U(1)^3 gauged supergravity, with equal charges Q and equal angular momenta J, dual to thermal states of N=4 SYM. Using matched asymptotic expansions and high-accuracy numerics, the authors construct the non-supersymmetric hairy black hole family that emerges from the scalar condensation instability of the Cvetič-Lü-Pope (CLP) black holes, confirm that these solutions dominate the microcanonical ensemble where they coexist with CLP, and follow them to temperatures as low as T L ~ 10^{-7}, several orders of magnitude below previous work. The central claim is that the BPS limit E = 3Q + 2J/L is singular: the entropy vanishes, while the scalar field and curvature invariants diverge at the horizon. The authors argue that this contradicts the earlier conjectures of Bhattacharyya-Minwalla-Papadodimas and Markeviciute-Santos, and support their conclusion with three lines of evidence: low-temperature numerics that pass first-law checks at the 0.1% level, an analytic explanation of why the perturbative expansion breaks down near the BPS surface, and a near-horizon analysis of the BPS equations that excludes regular solutions under stated assumptions.

Significance. If the conclusion is correct, the paper resolves a long-standing question about the existence of a two-parameter family of supersymmetric hairy black holes extending the one-parameter Gutowski-Reall solution, and it provides a concrete example of a phase of SYM whose gravitational dual is a hairy black hole that becomes singular at the BPS bound. The manuscript is notable for its transparency: numerical data are checked against the first law, the perturbative series (4.13) is compared with independent numerics, and the near-horizon BPS no-go argument is an analytic derivation with clearly stated assumptions. The paper also makes a falsifiable prediction about the low-temperature behavior of the entropy, which can in principle be checked with further numerical or analytic work. However, the strongest form of the claim, namely that the BPS limit is singular with certainty, rests on an extrapolation from finite-temperature data and on a BPS theorem that explicitly leaves open oscillatory scalar divergences; the gap between the evidence and the categorical phrasing is the main weakness.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6.1, Figs. 15-16] The statement that S -> 0 at E = E_BPS is based on extrapolating numerical data from T L ~ 10^{-7} to exactly T = 0, for a small set of (J,Q) slices: J/N^2 = 0.005 with QL/N^2 = 0.05 and 0.1, and J/N^2 = 0.05 with QL/N^2 = 0.15. The paper itself documents that data down to T L ~ 10^{-3} in refs. [2,3] suggested a finite entropy and were misleading, so this system already exhibits a low-temperature regime that changes qualitative behavior well below the previously explored range. Nothing in the present analysis excludes a further branch, crossover, or oscillatory approach below T L ~ 10^{-7} that could restore finite entropy at the BPS limit. To make the central claim conclusive, the authors should either provide a quantitative bound (for example from the near-horizon BPS equations) that rules out such behavior below the numerically reached temperature, or explicitly state that the conclusion is a strong numerical inference rather than a demonstrated theorem, and soften the wording accordingly.
  2. [Section 7.2 and Appendix B] The near-horizon BPS analysis proves that no regular BPS black hole exists if the scalar field is finite at the horizon, or if it diverges monotonically. As the authors explicitly acknowledge, the theorem does not exclude infinitely oscillating divergences such as x^{-1} sin(1/x). This is not a purely technical loophole: such an oscillating behavior could in principle connect to a finite-entropy branch at even lower temperatures, which is precisely the scenario the numerical extrapolation cannot rule out. The theorem should be strengthened, for example by adding physical assumptions such as boundedness of curvature invariants, analyticity of the horizon, or a condition on the oscillation frequency, or the paper should explicitly state that the no-go argument leaves this case open and therefore does not by itself close the gap left by the numerics.
  3. [Section 6.2, Eqs. (6.3)-(6.4)] The perturbative-breakdown argument convincingly explains why the series (4.13) and the non-interacting thermodynamic model fail close to the BPS surface. However, this argument does not by itself prove that S -> 0 at E = E_BPS; the reinterpretation via a simultaneous 'double BPS limit' y_+ -> 0, delta -> 0 is, as the authors admit, hand-waved. The two roles of this section should be cleanly separated: as a diagnosis of the failure of perturbation theory it is sound, but as an independent derivation of the singular limit it needs a controlled statement about the commutativity of the limits y_+ -> 0, delta -> 0 and the numerical T -> 0 limit. In the absence of such a statement, the numerical extrapolation remains the load-bearing evidence for the central claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.2] The phrase 'à priori' should be 'a priori' throughout.
  2. [Section 6.1] There is a typo in 'the scalr field' that should read 'the scalar field'.
  3. [Section 6.1] The sentence 'We conclude that the latter always has higher entropy' is ambiguous: if 'the latter' refers to the CLP black hole, it contradicts the preceding claim that the hairy black hole dominates the microcanonical ensemble; if it refers to the hairy black hole, the antecedent should be made explicit.
  4. [Sections 2.3, 8, and references] The spelling 'Breitlohner-Freedmann bound' is inconsistent with the standard 'Breitenlohner-Freedman' used in the references; please standardize.
  5. [Figs. 15-16 captions] The right panels plot entropy against E - E_BPS on a log-log scale rather than against temperature; the captions should state this explicitly to avoid confusion.
  6. [Section 4, Eq. (4.13)] The thermodynamic series (4.13a)-(4.13g) are given to high order with logarithmic terms, but the precise conditions of validity (for example delta >> y_+ and delta >> epsilon) are stated only later in Section 6.2; a brief note or footnote near (4.13) would prevent readers from applying the expansion outside its regime of validity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BPS-singularity claim rests on newly computed numerics plus a self-contained near-horizon no-go analysis; the extrapolation from T L ~ 10^-7 to T = 0 is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — that the BPS limit of the S3-invariant hairy black holes is singular, with entropy vanishing and scalar and curvature diverging at the horizon — does not reduce to its inputs by construction at any step I can exhibit. Three lines of evidence are independent of the conclusions they support. (1) The numerics (Section 5) solve the full nonlinear ODEs (2.6) with explicit boundary conditions (5.3)-(5.4); E, S, mu, and Omega_H are read off from the solutions, not fitted, and are checked by the first law (error < 0.1%) and exponential convergence, while the new code reproduces the prior data of [2] in the overlapping T L ~ 10^-3 window before extending roughly four orders of magnitude colder. The parameterization does not force S -> 0: S = N^2 pi y_+^3 sqrt(q4(0)) would remain finite at fixed y_+ if the family approached BPS with gamma -> 0 (the perturbative prediction (4.19)), so the observed shrinking of the horizon is a genuine output. (2) Section 6.2 derives, from the perturbative series itself, the validity criterion |ln delta| y_+^2 << 1, and uses it to expose why the naive finite-entropy BPS prediction of Section 4 is untrustworthy; a derivation that identifies and corrects its own breakdown is self-correction, not circularity. (3) The near-horizon BPS analysis (Section 7.2) is a parameter-free derivation from the external BPS equations of [15], with stated smooth-horizon assumptions (7.6) and a lemma proven in Appendix B; its scope is explicitly limited, as the authors acknowledge it does not exclude oscillatory divergences such as x^-1 sin(1/x). Self-citations are plentiful but not load-bearing: [2] (with co-author Santos) and [3] contain the conjecture being overturned, [1] is external, [48] supplies the standard numerical method, and [16] supplies a holographic renormalization whose explicit formulas appear in the text. The legitimate weak point — extrapolating S from T L ~ 10^-7 to exactly T = 0 with no theorem excluding a lower-temperature phase transition, in a system where the same style of extrapolation at 10^-3 proved misleading — is an epistemic and correctness risk, which belongs in a correctness assessment rather than a circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the consistency of the truncation and ansatz from prior literature, on near-horizon regularity assumptions in the BPS no-go proof, and on an extrapolation of numerical data to the BPS limit. No new entities are postulated, and the solution parameters y_+, epsilon, and gamma are coordinates on the solution family rather than fitted constants.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The S^3-invariant truncation of U(1)^3 gauged supergravity with a single gauge field, a single charged scalar, and X^K = 1 is a consistent truncation of Type IIB supergravity on AdS5 x S5.
    Invoked in Section 2.1, following references [1,15,17]. The 10D uplift of the 5D solutions is assumed to be valid.
  • domain assumption The ansatz (2.7) captures all solutions in this sector: cohomogeneity-1 metrics with equal angular momenta and equal charges, with a regular S^3 horizon.
    Section 2.2; the boundary value problem for seven functions is assumed to describe the relevant black hole family.
  • domain assumption Near-horizon regularity conditions (7.6): H = y_+^2 + o(1), h = b^2 + o(1), eta = o(x^-2), omega = o(x^-1) are necessary for a regular supersymmetric black hole horizon.
    Section 7.2; the BPS no-go argument is proven only under these assumptions, and the paper explicitly notes that oscillatory scalar divergences are not excluded.
  • standard math The theorem in Appendix B, relating f' = o(g') to f = o(g) for monotonic functions, is valid.
    Used in the proofs of claims (1) and (2) in Section 7.2.
  • ad hoc to paper The numerical scaling of entropy with E - E_BPS observed down to T L around 10^-7 persists to T = 0, so S tends to 0 in the BPS limit.
    Section 6.1 and Figs. 15-16; this extrapolation is the main basis for the singular-limit claim.
  • domain assumption No other field modes (e.g., neutral scalars or differences of the three scalars) condense at low temperatures, so the constructed single-scalar solutions remain the dominant phase.
    Acknowledged in Section 8: it remains to be verified that the hairy black holes are stable against potential condensations involving the remaining fields in the STU model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charged Rotating Hairy Black Holes in AdS$_5 \times S^5$: Unveiling their Secrets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PE3AFOE5

@misc{pith2026241118712,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charged Rotating Hairy Black Holes in AdS$_5 \times S^5$: Unveiling their Secrets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PE3AFOE5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.18712}
}
abstract

Using a mix of analytical and numerical methods, we construct new rotating, charged "hairy" black hole solutions of $D=5$, ${\cal N}=8$ gauged supergravity that are dual, via the AdS/CFT correspondence, to thermal states in $D=4$, ${\cal N}=4$ SYM at finite chemical and angular potential, thereby complementing and extending the results of [arXiv:1005.1287, arXiv:1806.01849, arXiv:1809.04084]. These solutions uplift to asymptotically AdS$_5 \times S^5$ solutions of Type IIB supergravity with equal angular momenta along AdS$_5$ ($J=J_1=J_2$) and $S^5$ ($Q=Q_1=Q_2=Q_3$). As we lower the mass $E$ at fixed $Q$ and $J$, the known Cveti\v{c}-L\"u-Pope (CLP) black holes are unstable to scalar condensation and the hairy black holes constructed here emerge as novel solutions associated to the instability. In the region of phase space where the CLP and hairy black holes coexist, the hairy black holes dominate the microcanonical ensemble and, therefore, describe a new thermodynamic phase of SYM. The hairy black holes extend beyond the CLP extremality surface all the way to the BPS surface, defined by $E = 3 Q + 2 J / L$. Through a combination of analytical and numerical techniques, we argue that the BPS limit of the hairy black holes is a singular, horizonless solution, and $not$ a new two-parameter family of BPS black holes that extend the known one-parameter Gutowski-Reall (GR) black hole solution, in contradiction with the conjectures of [arXiv:1005.1287, arXiv:1806.01849]. To further support our conclusions, we perform a near-horizon analysis of the BPS equations and argue that they do not admit any regular solutions with an horizon.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Equal-charge projection of the $\mathcal{N}=4$ index: exact large-$N$ formula and finite-rank $U(3)$ coefficients

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Equal-charge projection of the N=4 index admits an exact large-N factorization into a pentagonal prefactor times the cube of the partition function, and finite-rank U(3) coefficients populate the resulting zero interv...

  2. Instability in ${\cal N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at finite density

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    At equal R-charge chemical potentials, the holographic AdS5-Reissner-Nordström black brane has a negative R-charge diffusion coefficient below a critical μ/T, making the low-temperature phase unstable.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Bhattacharyya, S

    S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla and K. Papadodimas,Small Hairy Black Holes inAdS5ˆ S5, JHEP 1111 (2011) 035, [1005.1287]

    arXiv 2011

  2. [2]

    Markeviciute and J

    J. Markeviciute and J. E. Santos,Evidence for the existence of a novel class of supersymmetric black holes with AdS5ˆS5 asymptotics, Class. Quant. Grav.36 (2019) 02LT01, [1806.01849]. – 66 –

    arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Rotating Hairy Black Holes in AdS$_5\times$S$^5$

    J. Markeviciute,Rotating Hairy Black Holes in AdS5ˆS5, JHEP 03 (2019) 110, [1809.04084]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int.J.Theor.Phys. 38 (1999) 1113–1133, [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1999

  5. [5]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B428 (1998) 105–114, [hep-th/9802109]

    arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity, Phys. Rept. 323 (2000) 183–386, [hep-th/9905111]

    arXiv 2000

  8. [8]

    Strominger and C

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 99–104, [hep-th/9601029]

    arXiv 1996

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    J. C. Breckenridge, R. C. Myers, A. W. Peet and C. Vafa,D-branes and spinning black holes, Phys. Lett. B391 (1997) 93–98, [hep-th/9602065]

    1997 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Hosseini,Black hole microstates and supersymmetric localization

    S. Hosseini,Black hole microstates and supersymmetric localization. PhD thesis, Milan Bicocca U., 2, 2018.1803.01863

    2018

  3. [11]

    S. Choi, J. Kim, S. Kim and J. Nahmgoong,Large AdS black holes from QFT, 1810.12067

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Cabo-Bizet, D

    A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli and S. Murthy,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of supersymmetric AdS5 black holes, JHEP 10 (2019) 062, [1810.11442]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Benini and P

    F. Benini and P. Milan,Black Holes in 4DN=4 Super-Yang-Mills Field Theory, Phys. Rev. X 10 (2020) 021037, [1812.09613]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Zaffaroni,AdS black holes, holography and localization, Living Rev

    A. Zaffaroni,AdS black holes, holography and localization, Living Rev. Rel.23 (2020) 2, [1902.07176]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    J. T. Liu, H. Lu, C. N. Pope and J. F. Vazquez-Poritz,New supersymmetric solutions of N=2, D=5 gauged supergravity with hyperscalars, JHEP 10 (2007) 093, [0705.2234]

    2007 arXiv

  8. [16]

    O. J. C. Dias, P. Mitra and J. E. Santos,New phases ofN = 4 SYM at finite chemical potential, JHEP 05 (2023) 053, [2207.07134]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C. N. Pope, A. Sadrzadeh and T. A. Tran,Consistent SO(6) reduction of type IIB supergravity on S**5, Nucl. Phys. B 586 (2000) 275–286, [hep-th/0003103]

    2000 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Behrndt, M

    K. Behrndt, M. Cvetic and W. A. Sabra,Nonextreme black holes of five-dimensional N=2 AdS supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 553 (1999) 317–332, [hep-th/9810227]

    1999 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C. N. Pope,Charged rotating black holes in five dimensional U(1)3 gauged N=2 supergravity, Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 081502, [hep-th/0407058]

    2004 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Cvetič, H

    M. Cvetič, H. Lü and C. Pope,Charged kerr–de sitter black holes in five dimensions, Physics Letters B 598 (2004) 273–278

    2004

  13. [21]

    J. B. Gutowski and H. S. Reall,Supersymmetric AdS(5) black holes, JHEP 02 (2004) 006, [hep-th/0401042]. – 67 –

    2004 arXiv

  14. [22]

    J. B. Gutowski and H. S. Reall,General supersymmetric AdS(5) black holes, JHEP 04 (2004) 048, [hep-th/0401129]

    2004 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Z. W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C. N. Pope,Five-dimensional gauged supergravity black holes with independent rotation parameters, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 041901, [hep-th/0505112]

    2005 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Z. W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C. N. Pope,General non-extremal rotating black holes in minimal five-dimensional gauged supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.95 (2005) 161301, [hep-th/0506029]

    2005 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Cvetic, G

    M. Cvetic, G. W. Gibbons, H. Lu and C. N. Pope,Rotating black holes in gauged supergravities: Thermodynamics, supersymmetric limits, topological solitons and time machines, hep-th/0504080

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    H. K. Kunduri, J. Lucietti and H. S. Reall,Supersymmetric multi-charge AdS(5) black holes, JHEP 04 (2006) 036, [hep-th/0601156]

    2006 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Z. W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C. N. Pope,Non-extremal rotating black holes in five-dimensional gauged supergravity, Phys. Lett. B644 (2007) 192–197, [hep-th/0606213]

    2007 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Mei and C

    J. Mei and C. Pope,New rotating non-extremal black holes in d=5 maximal gauged supergravity, Physics Letters B658 (2007) 64–70

    2007

  21. [29]

    Wu,General Nonextremal Rotating Charged AdS Black Holes in Five-dimensional Up1q3 Gauged Supergravity: A Simple Construction Method, Phys

    S.-Q. Wu,General Nonextremal Rotating Charged AdS Black Holes in Five-dimensional Up1q3 Gauged Supergravity: A Simple Construction Method, Phys. Lett. B707 (2012) 286–291, [1108.4159]

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Gunaydin, G

    M. Gunaydin, G. Sierra and P. K. Townsend,The Geometry of N=2 Maxwell-Einstein Supergravity and Jordan Algebras, Nucl. Phys. B 242 (1984) 244–268

    1984

  23. [31]

    P. Basu, J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, R. Loganayagam, S. Minwalla et al.,Small Hairy Black Holes in Global AdS Spacetime, JHEP 1010 (2010) 045, [1003.3232]

    2010 arXiv

  24. [32]

    O. J. C. Dias, P. Figueras, S. Minwalla, P. Mitra, R. Monteiro and J. E. Santos,Hairy black holes and solitons in globalAdS5, JHEP 08 (2012) 117, [1112.4447]

    2012 arXiv

  25. [33]

    O. J. C. Dias and R. Masachs,Hairy black holes and the endpoint of AdS4 charged superradiance, JHEP 02 (2017) 128, [1610.03496]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    O. J. C. Dias, G. T. Horowitz and J. E. Santos,Black holes with only one Killing field, JHEP 07 (2011) 115, [1105.4167]

    2011 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Stotyn, M

    S. Stotyn, M. Park, P. McGrath and R. B. Mann,Black Holes and Boson Stars with One Killing Field in Arbitrary Odd Dimensions, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 044036, [1110.2223]

    2012 arXiv

  28. [36]

    O. J. C. Dias and J. E. Santos,Boundary Conditions for Kerr-AdS Perturbations, JHEP 10 (2013) 156, [1302.1580]

    2013 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Cardoso, O

    V. Cardoso, O. J. C. Dias, G. S. Hartnett, L. Lehner and J. E. Santos,Holographic thermalization, quasinormal modes and superradiance in Kerr-AdS, JHEP 04 (2014) 183, [1312.5323]

    2014 arXiv

  30. [38]

    O. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos and B. Way,Black holes with a single Killing vector field: black resonators, JHEP 12 (2015) 171, [1505.04793]. – 68 –

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman,Stability in Gauged Extended Supergravity, Annals Phys. 144 (1982) 249

    1982

  32. [40]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman,Positive Energy in anti-De Sitter Backgrounds and Gauged Extended Supergravity, Phys. Lett. B115 (1982) 197–201

    1982

  33. [41]

    Cardoso and O

    V. Cardoso and O. J. C. Dias,Small Kerr-anti-de Sitter black holes are unstable, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 084011, [hep-th/0405006]

    2004 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Markeviciute and J

    J. Markeviciute and J. E. Santos,Hairy black holes in AdS5 × S5, JHEP 06 (2016) 096, [1602.03893]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    M. M. Caldarelli, G. Cognola and D. Klemm,Thermodynamics of Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes and conformal field theories, Class. Quant. Grav.17 (2000) 399–420, [hep-th/9908022]

    2000 arXiv

  36. [44]

    G. W. Gibbons, M. J. Perry and C. N. Pope,The first law of thermodynamics for kerr–anti-de sitter black holes, Classical and Quantum Gravity22 (May, 2005) 1503–1526

    2005

  37. [45]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis,How to go with an RG flow, JHEP 08 (2001) 041, [hep-th/0105276]

    2001 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis,Holographic renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B631 (2002) 159–194, [hep-th/0112119]

    2002 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Behrndt, M

    K. Behrndt, M. Cvetič and W. Sabra,Non-extreme black holes of five-dimensional n = 2 ads supergravity, Nuclear Physics B553 (July, 1999) 317–332

    1999

  40. [48]

    O. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos and B. Way,Numerical Methods for Finding Stationary Gravitational Solutions, 1510.02804

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Markeviciute,Numerical Construction of Gravitational Solutions in Asymptotically Anti-de Sitter Spacetimes

    J. Markeviciute,Numerical Construction of Gravitational Solutions in Asymptotically Anti-de Sitter Spacetimes. PhD thesis, Cambridge U., DAMTP, 2019. 10.17863/CAM.38841

    2019 doi

  42. [50]

    O. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos and B. Way,Lumpy AdS5ˆ S5 black holes and black belts, JHEP 04 (2015) 060, [1501.06574]

    2015 arXiv

  43. [51]

    O. J. C. Dias, J. E. Santos and B. Way,Localised AdS5ˆ S5 Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 151101, [1605.04911]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [52]

    O. J. Dias, J. E. Santos and B. Way,Localised and nonuniform thermal states of super-Yang-Mills on a circle, JHEP 06 (2017) 029, [1702.07718]

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    O. J. Dias, G. S. Hartnett, B. E. Niehoff and J. E. Santos,Mass-deformed M2 branes in Stenzel space, JHEP 11 (2017) 105, [1704.02323]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    I. Bena, O. J. Dias, G. S. Hartnett, B. E. Niehoff and J. E. Santos,Holographic dual of hot Polchinski-Strassler quark-gluon plasma, JHEP 09 (2019) 033, [1805.06463]

    2019 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Y. Bea, O. J. C. Dias, T. Giannakopoulos, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia, J. E. Santos et al.,Crossing a large-N phase transition at finite volume, JHEP 02 (2021) 061, [2007.06467]

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    O. J. C. Dias and J. E. Santos,The Low Energy Limit of BFSS Quantum Mechanics, 2407.15921. – 69 –

  49. [57]

    Gunaydin, L

    M. Gunaydin, L. J. Romans and N. P. Warner,Compact and Noncompact Gauged Supergravity Theories in Five-Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 272 (1986) 598–646

    1986

  50. [58]

    Pernici, K

    M. Pernici, K. Pilch and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,Gauged N=8 D=5 Supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 259 (1985) 460

    1985

  51. [59]

    H. J. Kim, L. J. Romans and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,The Mass Spectrum of Chiral N=2 D=10 Supergravity on S**5, Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) 389

    1985

  52. [60]

    Khavaev, K

    A. Khavaev, K. Pilch and N. P. Warner,New vacua of gauged N=8 supergravity in five-dimensions, Phys. Lett. B487 (2000) 14–21, [hep-th/9812035]

    2000 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Cvetic, M

    M. Cvetic, M. J. Duff, P. Hoxha, J. T. Liu, H. Lu, J. X. Lu et al.,Embedding AdS black holes in ten-dimensions and eleven-dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 558 (1999) 96–126, [hep-th/9903214]

    1999 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Cvetic, S

    M. Cvetic, S. S. Gubser, H. Lu and C. N. Pope,Symmetric potentials of gauged supergravities in diverse dimensions and Coulomb branch of gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 086003, [hep-th/9909121]

    2000 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C. N. Pope and A. Sadrzadeh,Consistency of Kaluza-Klein sphere reductions of symmetric potentials, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 046005, [hep-th/0002056]

    2000 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Ciceri, B

    F. Ciceri, B. de Wit and O. Varela,IIB supergravity and the E6p6q covariant vector-tensor hierarchy, JHEP 04 (2015) 094, [1412.8297]

    2015 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Baguet, O

    A. Baguet, O. Hohm and H. Samtleben,Consistent Type IIB Reductions to Maximal 5D Supergravity, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 065004, [1506.01385]

    2015 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Wu,General rotating charged Kaluza-Klein AdS black holes in higher dimensions, Phys

    S.-Q. Wu,General rotating charged Kaluza-Klein AdS black holes in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 121502, [1108.4157]

    2011 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Larsen, J

    F. Larsen, J. Nian and Y. Zeng,AdS5 black hole entropy near the BPS limit, JHEP 06 (2020) 001, [1907.02505]

    2020 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Benini, E

    F. Benini, E. Colombo, S. Soltani, A. Zaffaroni and Z. Zhang,Superconformal indices at large N and the entropy of AdS5 ˆ SE5 black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.37 (2020) 215021, [2005.12308]

    2020 arXiv

  61. [69]

    S. W. Hawking and H. S. Reall,Charged and rotating AdS black holes and their CFT duals, Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 024014, [hep-th/9908109]

    2000 arXiv

  62. [70]

    H. K. Kunduri, J. Lucietti and H. S. Reall,Gravitational perturbations of higher dimensional rotating black holes: Tensor perturbations, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 084021, [hep-th/0606076]

    2006 arXiv

  63. [71]

    S. R. Green, S. Hollands, A. Ishibashi and R. M. Wald,Superradiant instabilities of asymptotically anti-de Sitter black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.33 (2016) 125022, [1512.02644]

    2016 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Ishii and K

    T. Ishii and K. Murata,Black resonators and geons in AdS5, Class. Quant. Grav.36 (2019) 125011, [1810.11089]

    2019 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Ishii, K

    T. Ishii, K. Murata, J. E. Santos and B. Way,Superradiant instability of black resonators and geons, JHEP 07 (2020) 206, [2005.01201]. – 70 –

    2020 arXiv

  66. [74]

    S. S. Gubser,Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 065034, [0801.2977]

    2008 arXiv

  67. [75]

    O. J. C. Dias, R. Monteiro, H. S. Reall and J. E. Santos,A Scalar field condensation instability of rotating anti-de Sitter black holes, JHEP 11 (2010) 036, [1007.3745]

    2010 arXiv

  68. [76]

    S. Kim, S. Kundu, E. Lee, J. Lee, S. Minwalla and C. Patel,Grey Galaxies’ as an endpoint of the Kerr-AdS superradiant instability, JHEP 11 (2023) 024, [2305.08922]

    2023 arXiv

  69. [77]

    S. Choi, D. Jain, S. Kim, V. Krishna, E. Lee, S. Minwalla et al.,Dual Dressed Black Holes as the end point of the Charged Superradiant instability inN “ 4 Yang Mills, 2409.18178

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    Ezroura and F

    N. Ezroura and F. Larsen,Supergravity Spectrum of AdS5 Black Holes, 2408.11529

    arXiv

  71. [79]

    M. T. Grisaru, R. C. Myers and O. Tafjord,SUSY and goliath, JHEP 08 (2000) 040, [hep-th/0008015]

    2000 arXiv

  72. [80]

    McGreevy, L

    J. McGreevy, L. Susskind and N. Toumbas,Invasion of the giant gravitons from Anti-de Sitter space, JHEP 06 (2000) 008, [hep-th/0003075]

    2000 arXiv

  73. [81]

    H. Lin, O. Lunin and J. M. Maldacena,Bubbling AdS space and 1/2 BPS geometries, JHEP 10 (2004) 025, [hep-th/0409174]

    2004 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Armas and G.-P

    J. Armas and G.-P. Nicosia,New asymptotically (anti)-de Sitter black holes in (super)gravity, JHEP 09 (2024) 047, [2406.17489]. – 71 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.