Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 69 references

Prediction of high-Tc superconductivity under submegabar pressure in ternary actinium borohydrides

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper predicts that the ternary hydride AcBH7 superconducts at 122 K under 70 GPa, a pressure already reached in experiments on LaBeH8 and LaB2H8.

desk verdict Solid ternary-hydride prediction with a genuinely new AcBH7 phase; the headline Tc rests on dynamic stability only, so the missing 70 GPa thermodynamic check is the real soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19014 v1 pith:XE23NRYS submitted 2024-11-28 cond-mat.supr-con

Tingting Gu (1) , Wenwen Cui (1) , Jian Hao (1) , Jingming Shi (1) , Artur P. Durajski (2) , Hanyu Liu (3) , Yinwei Li (1) ((1) Laboratory of Quantum Functional Materials Design , Application
show 15 more authors
School of Physics Electronic Engineering Jiangsu Normal University Xuzhou 221116 China (2) Institute of Physics Czestochowa University of Technology Ave. Armii Krajowej 19 42-200 Czestochowa Poland (3) Key Laboratory of Material Simulation Methods Software of Ministry of Education State KeyLaboratory of Superhard Materials College of Physics Jilin University Changchun 130012 China)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con PACS 74.70.Ad74.25.Kc
keywords ternaryhydridesuperconductoractiniumborohydridehigh-pressuresuperconductivityelectron-phononcouplingEliashbergequationsstructurepredictionBH6octahedronsubmegabarpressure
topics High-Temperature Superconductivity
open problems High-Temperature Superconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper predicts that the ternary hydride AcBH7, in a hexagonal $P\bar{3}m1$ structure, is dynamically stable at 70 GPa and becomes superconducting at 122 K, a value obtained by solving the Eliashberg equations. If correct, it would be a new high-temperature hydride superconductor stabilized at submegabar pressure, comparable to LaBeH8 (110 K at 80 GPa) and LaB2H8 (106 K at 90 GPa), both of which have been synthesized. The authors map the Ac-B-H phase diagram at 100 and 200 GPa, identify nine thermodynamically stable compounds, and trace the enhanced superconductivity of AcBH7 to soft phonon modes and to the hydrogen-rich BH6 octahedral units that dominate the Fermi-level density of states. The result gives experimentalists a specific ternary composition and structure to target in high-pressure synthesis.

What carries the argument

The central object is the $P\bar{3}m1$ AcBH7 phase and its BH6 octahedral units, arranged on a hexagonal lattice, with additional hydrogen atoms not bonded to boron. The argument runs through three calculated quantities: the convex hull of the Ac-B-H system at 100 and 200 GPa, the phonon spectrum that establishes dynamical stability, and the Eliashberg spectral function $\alpha^2F(\omega)$, whose moments give $\lambda$ and $\omega_{\log}$ and feed the Allen-Dynes-modified McMillan equation or a full Eliashberg solution. The softening of four phonon modes under decompression, one dominated by Ac motion and three by B-H and H vibrations, is the mechanism that raises $\lambda$ to 1.98 and $T_c$ to 122 K.

What would settle it

A convex-hull computation at 70 GPa that places $P\bar{3}m1$ AcBH7 above the equilibrium mixture of Ac, B, H and the known binary or ternary phases would falsify the synthesizability claim, as would a diamond-anvil synthesis attempt at 70 GPa that recovers no AcBH7 phase.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that $P\bar{3}m1$ AcBH7, a layered hexagonal phase in which each boron sits in a BH6 octahedron, remains dynamically stable at 70 GPa and has a superconducting critical temperature of 122 K, obtained by solving the Eliashberg equations with Coulomb pseudopotential $\mu^* = 0.10$. At 200 GPa the same phase has $T_c$ of only 43 K; decompression to 70 GPa softens four phonon modes, raises the electron-phonon coupling $\lambda$ from 0.67 to 1.98, and increases the hydrogen share of the Fermi-level DOS to 56%. The paper argues that the strong B-H interaction inside the BH6 units is what stabilizes the structure at submegabar pressure and drives the high $T_c$. It also compares with isostructural LaBH7, CeBH7, and ThBH7 to show that the H-dominated DOS at the Fermi level, not the total DOS, is the decisive factor for achieving high-temperature superconductivity.

Load-bearing premise

The 122 K result at 70 GPa assumes the $P\bar{3}m1$ AcBH7 phase found at 200 GPa survives decompression without transforming into another phase or decomposing; the paper checks only phonon stability at 70 GPa, not thermodynamic stability against competing mixtures at that pressure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, AcBH7 joins LaBeH8 and LaB2H8 as a ternary hydride with $T_c$ above 100 K at pressures below 100 GPa, giving experimentalists a specific target composition and crystal structure.
  • The predicted pressure dependence, 43 K at 200 GPa rising to 122 K at 70 GPa, means that tuning pressure alone could nearly triple the superconducting critical temperature in the same compound.
  • The BH6 motif and the H-dominated Fermi-level DOS identified here can be used to screen other actinide and rare-earth borohydrides computationally before synthesis.
  • The dynamical stability down to 70 GPa makes AcBH7 compatible with existing laser-heated diamond-anvil synthesis techniques used for other ternary hydrides.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to compute the convex hull at 70 GPa and at intermediate pressures, which the paper does not do; this would determine the true synthesis window and could reveal whether even lower pressures raise or suppress $T_c$.
  • The systematic comparison with La, Ce, and Th substitutions suggests the metal site is a tunable parameter, so substituting other light metals into the BH7 framework might lower the stabilization pressure below 70 GPa while keeping a high hydrogen contribution at the Fermi level.
  • The BH6 octahedron may act as a reusable chemical pre-compression module, implying that other ternary systems containing BH6 units could be searched deliberately rather than scanning all stoichiometries blindly.
  • If the 122 K prediction is confirmed, measurements of the isotope effect and upper critical field on the same structure would give experimental fingerprints to verify the phonon-mediated mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses CALYPSO structure searches combined with DFT and linear-response phonon calculations to explore the ternary Ac-B-H system at 100 and 200 GPa, reporting several thermodynamically stable compounds. Among them, the P-3m1 AcBH7 phase is found to be dynamically stable down to 70 GPa upon decompression, and Eliashberg calculations give a superconducting critical temperature of about 122 K (ADM estimate: 86 K). The authors compare this with the synthesized ternary hydrides LaBeH8 (110 K at 80 GPa) and LaB2H8 (106 K at 90 GPa) and attribute the high Tc to H-derived states at the Fermi level and to B-H vibrational modes in BH6 units.

Significance. If the phase is experimentally realizable, the prediction would extend ternary hydride superconductivity to an actinium borohydride at submegabar pressure and provide a concrete synthesis target. The paper follows a standard computational pipeline, reports both Allen-Dynes and Eliashberg Tc estimates, and explicitly checks phonon stability with denser q meshes. The comparison with isostructural LaBH7 and with Ce- and Th-substituted analogues is also useful. However, the central claim currently rests on a phase that is only dynamically, not thermodynamically, stable at 70 GPa; this is the main weakness that needs to be addressed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results and Discussion; Fig. 1; Fig. S13] The headline prediction of 122 K at 70 GPa lacks a thermodynamic stability analysis at that pressure. The convex hull is computed only at 100 and 200 GPa (Fig. 1), and at 100 GPa AcBH7 is not on the hull; it becomes stable only at 200 GPa. The CALYPSO searches were also performed only at 100 and 200 GPa. Thus, the P-3m1 AcBH7 structure at 70 GPa is presently only a dynamically stable metastable phase: it could decompose into AcH, BH, or other Ac-B-H compounds, or transform to a different structure, upon decompression. I request a full convex-hull calculation at 70 GPa (and ideally at intermediate pressures such as 80 and 90 GPa) against all relevant elemental, binary, and ternary phases, or at least an enthalpy comparison of P-3m1 AcBH7 with the most plausible decomposition products. Without this, the comparison with the experimentally synthesized equilibrium phases LaBeH8 and LaB2H8 is not justified.
  2. [Computational Details; Table I] The reported Tc of 122 K for AcBH7 at 70 GPa is obtained from the Eliashberg equations, whereas the Allen-Dynes formula gives only 86 K for the same λ = 1.98 and ωlog = 600.86 K. The large difference shows that the result is sensitive to the strong-coupling regime, yet the paper does not discuss the convergence of the electron-phonon coupling constant with respect to the k- and q-point meshes, nor the sensitivity of Tc to the Coulomb pseudopotential μ* in the standard 0.10–0.13 range. Because 122 K is presented as the central quantitative prediction, please provide convergence checks for λ and a Tc versus μ* curve (or at least the Tc value at μ* = 0.13) to establish the robustness of the estimate.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Conclusions] The paper states that nine stable compounds are uncovered, but the list in the Conclusions contains ten chemical formulas, including AcB2H8, while the Introduction lists nine compounds without AcB2H8. Please reconcile the count and clarify whether AcB2H8 is being counted as a new compound or as a previously known phase.
  2. [Abstract and throughout] The Abstract says that seven Ac-B-H compounds were found to become superconductive, but only six compounds (AcB2H8, AcB2H14, AcBH16, AcBH7, AcBH8, AcB2H13) have EPC or Tc results reported in the text and Table I. Please either provide the missing Tc values or correct the count.
  3. [Abstract] There are several typographical errors, including 'idea candidates' instead of 'ideal candidates' and 'submegar' instead of 'submegabar'; a careful proofreading pass is recommended.
  4. [Results and Discussion] The text says 'another four stoichiometries AcBH7, AcBH8, AcB2H8 and AcB2H14 start to locate at the convex hull at 200 GPa,' but because AcB2H8 was previously reported, the phrasing should clarify which of these are newly predicted and which are known phases.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the predicted 122 K Tc follows from first-principles phonon/EPC calculations with a fixed mu*; missing 70 GPa thermodynamic stability is a correctness concern, not circularity.

full rationale

The central claim, that P-3m1 AcBH7 has a Tc of 122 K at 70 GPa, is derived from a self-contained computational chain: the structure was found by unbiased CALYPSO searches at 100 and 200 GPa, its thermodynamic stability at those pressures was assessed against convex hulls (Fig. 1), and the 70 GPa result rests on a dynamically stable phonon calculation (Fig. S13) together with first-principles electron-phonon coupling quantities lambda and omega_log (Fig. 4). These enter the Allen-Dynes modified McMillan and Eliashberg equations with a fixed, standard Coulomb pseudopotential mu* = 0.10. Nothing is fitted to the target 122 K; mu* is not optimized against the claimed Tc, and the LaBeH8 and LaB2H8 comparisons are external benchmarks rather than inputs that force AcBH7's Tc. The paper's self-citations, such as earlier LaBH7 work by co-author Liu, are used only for structural comparison or as methodological background and are independently recomputed or cross-checked in this work; they do not supply the superconducting parameters. The absence of a 70 GPa thermodynamic convex hull calculation is a real limitation regarding synthesizability, but it is not circularity: the issue is whether the phase is realizable at that pressure, not whether the Tc estimate reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The prediction rests almost entirely on the standard DFT-to-Eliashberg pipeline. The only explicit numerical free input is mu*=0.10; all other assumptions are conventional methodological choices. The least supported assumption is that the 200 GPa AcBH7 phase persists at 70 GPa, where only dynamical stability is checked.

free parameters (1)
  • Coulomb pseudopotential mu* = 0.10 (assumed)
    Enters Tc via Eq. (1) and Eliashberg equations; the paper states typical values are 0.1-0.13 but reports no sensitivity of the 122 K result to this choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption PBE exchange-correlation functional accurately describes enthalpies, electronic structure, and phonons for Ac-B-H at 70-200 GPa.
    All VASP and Quantum ESPRESSO calculations use PBE; no functional sensitivity tests are reported. This is standard for hydride structure prediction but remains an approximation.
  • domain assumption Phonon and electron-phonon coupling are computed in the harmonic approximation at 0 K.
    PHONOPY supercell and QE linear response assume harmonic vibrations; near-decompression soft modes for AcBH7 at 70 GPa (lambda=1.98) may need anharmonic or zero-point corrections.
  • domain assumption Conventional phonon-mediated superconductivity described by the McMillan-Eliashberg theory with a single Coulomb pseudopotential mu* applies.
    Tc estimates use Eq. (1) and Eliashberg equations with mu*=0.10; no alternative pairing mechanism or mu* sensitivity is considered.
  • ad hoc to paper The P-3m1 AcBH7 structure found at 200 GPa remains the relevant phase at 70 GPa.
    The paper confirms dynamical stability at 70 GPa (no imaginary phonons, Fig. S13) but does not compute a 70 GPa convex hull against Ac-H, B-H, or elemental decomposition; thermodynamic stability is only reported at 200 GPa.
  • domain assumption CALYPSO structure searches at 100 and 200 GPa are sufficiently converged to find all relevant ground states.
    Search uses about 2000 structures per stoichiometry, but global-minimum claims are not formally certified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Prediction of high-Tc superconductivity under submegabar pressure in ternary actinium borohydrides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XE23NRYS

@misc{pith2026241119014,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Prediction of high-Tc superconductivity under submegabar pressure in ternary actinium borohydrides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XE23NRYS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19014}
}
read the original abstract

Ternary hydrides are considered as the ideal candidates with high critical temperature (Tc) stabilized at submegabar pressure, evidenced by the recent discoveries in LaBeH8 (110 K at 80 GPa) and LaB2H8 (106 K at 90 GPa). Here, we investigate the crystal structures and superconductivity of an Ac-B-H system under pressures of 100 and 200 GPa by using an advanced structure method combined with first-principles calculations. As a result, nine stable compounds were identified, where B atoms are bonded with H atoms in the formation with diverse BHx motifs, e.g., methanelike (BH4), polythenelike, (BH2)n,andBH6 octahedron. Among them, seven Ac-B-H compounds were found to become superconductive. In particular, AcBH7 was estimated to have a Tc of 122 K at 70 GPa. Our in-depth analysis reveals that the B-H interactions in the BH6 units play a key role in its high superconductivity and stability at submegabar pressure. Our current results provide a guidance for future experiments to synthesize ternary hydride superconductors with high-Tc at moderate pressure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19014 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Six compounds are identified to be thermodynamically [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Calculated stabilities of Ac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The stable structures of Ac-B-H compounds: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Electronic band structures of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phonon-dispersion curves, PHDOS, projected on the Ac, B, and H atoms, Eliashberg spectral function, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The projected electronic band structure of each atoms in (a) CeBH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [67]

    Yang, W.-C

    W.-H. Yang, W.-C. Lu, S.-D. Li, X.-Y . Xue, Q.-J. Zang, K.- M. Ho, and C.-Z. Wang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 21, 5466 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    Wigner and H

    E. Wigner and H. ´a. Huntington, J. Chem. Phys. 3, 764 (1935)

    work page 1935

  3. [2]

    N. W. Ashcroft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1748 (1968)

    1968

  4. [3]

    Azadi, B

    S. Azadi, B. Monserrat, W. Foulkes, and R. Needs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 165501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [4]

    McMinis, R

    J. McMinis, R. C. Clay III, D. Lee, and M. A. Morales, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105305 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [5]

    Ashcroft, Phys

    N. Ashcroft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 187002 (2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [6]

    Y . Li, J. Hao, H. Liu, Y . Li, and Y . Ma, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 174712 (2014)

    2014

  8. [7]

    D. Duan, X. Huang, F. Tian, D. Li, H. Yu, Y . Liu, Y . Ma, B. Liu, and T. Cui, Phys. Rev. B91, 180502 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 69 references
  1. [8]

    D. Duan, Y . Liu, F. Tian, D. Li, X. Huang, Z. Zhao, H. Yu, B. Liu, W. Tian, and T. Cui, Sci. Rep. 4

  2. [9]

    Drozdov, M

    A. Drozdov, M. Eremets, I. Troyan, V . Ksenofontov, and S. I. Shylin, Nature 525, 73 (2015)

    2015

  3. [10]

    and Ac xByHz (x = 1-2, y = 1-2, z = 1-16) ranging from 1 to 4 f.u./cell at 100 and 200 GPa. More than 2000 struc- tures for each stoichiometry during the prediction search and continues to generate 1000 structures after the lowest energy structure is determined in order to ens...

    2000

  4. [11]

    H. Liu, I. I. Naumov, R. Hoffmann, N. Ashcroft, and R. J. Hemley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 6990 (2017)

    2017

  5. [12]

    Drozdov, P

    A. Drozdov, P. Kong, V . Minkov, S. Besedin, M. Kuzovnikov, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. Balakirev, D. Graf, V . Prakapenka, et al., Nature 569, 528 (2019)

    2019

  6. [13]

    F. Peng, Y . Sun, C. J. Pickard, R. J. Needs, Q. Wu, and Y . Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 107001 (2017)

    2017

  7. [14]

    Somayazulu, M

    M. Somayazulu, M. Ahart, A. K. Mishra, Z. M. Geballe, M. Baldini, Y . Meng, V . V . Struzhkin, and R. J. Hemley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 027001 (2019)

    2019

  8. [15]

    Y . Li, J. Hao, H. Liu, J. S. Tse, Y . Wang, and Y . Ma, Sci. Rep. 5, 9948 (2015). 7

    2015

  9. [16]

    P. Kong, V . S. Minkov, M. A. Kuzovnikov, A. P. Drozdov, S. P. Besedin, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. F. Balakirev, V . B. Prakapenka, S. Chariton, et al., Nat. Commun. 12, 5075 (2021)

    2021

  10. [17]

    I. A. Troyan, D. V . Semenok, A. G. Kvashnin, A. V . Sadakov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, V . M. Pudalov, A. G. Ivanova, V . B. Prakapenka, E. Greenberg, A. G. Gavriliuk, et al., Adv. Mater. 33, 2006832 (2021)

    2021

  11. [18]

    Snider, N

    E. Snider, N. Dasenbrock-Gammon, R. McBride, X. Wang, N. Meyers, K. V . Lawler, E. Zurek, A. Salamat, and R. P. Dias, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 117003 (2021)

    2021

  12. [19]

    H. Wang, J. S. Tse, K. Tanaka, T. Iitaka, and Y . Ma, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 6463 (2012)

    2012

  13. [20]

    L. Ma, K. Wang, Y . Xie, X. Yang, Y . Wang, M. Zhou, H. Liu, X. Yu, Y . Zhao, H. Wang,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 167001 (2022)

    2022

  14. [21]

    Z. Li, X. He, C. Zhang, X. Wang, S. Zhang, Y . Jia, S. Feng, K. Lu, J. Zhao, J. Zhang,et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 2863 (2022)

    2022

  15. [22]

    Zurek and T

    E. Zurek and T. Bi, J. Chem. Phys. 150, 050901 (2019)

    2019

  16. [23]

    J. A. Flores-Livas, L. Boeri, A. Sanna, G. Profeta, R. Arita, and M. Eremets, Phys. Rep. 856, 1 (2020)

    2020

  17. [24]

    D. V . Semenok, I. A. Troyan, A. G. Ivanova, A. G. Kvashnin, I. A. Kruglov, M. Hanfland, A. V . Sadakov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, K. S. Pervakov, I. S. Lyubutin, et al. , Mater. Today 48, 18 (2021)

    2021

  18. [25]

    W. Chen, X. Huang, D. Semenok, S. Chen, D. Zhou, K. Zhang, A. Oganov, and T. Cui, (2022)

    2022

  19. [26]

    J. Bi, Y . Nakamoto, K. Shimizu, M. Zhou, H. Wang, G. Liu, and Y . Ma, arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.04623 (2022)

    2022

  20. [27]

    D. V . Semenok, I. A. Troyan, A. V . Sadakov, D. Zhou, M. Galasso, A. G. Kvashnin, A. G. Ivanova, I. A. Kruglov, A. A. Bykov, K. Y . Terent’ev,et al., Adv. Mater. 34, 2204038 (2022)

    2022

  21. [28]

    S. Chen, Y . Qian, X. Huang, W. Chen, J. Guo, K. Zhang, J. Zhang, H. Yuan, and T. Cui, Nat. Sci. Rev. 11, nwad107 (2024)

    2024

  22. [29]

    W. Cui, T. Bi, J. Shi, Y . Li, H. Liu, E. Zurek, and R. J. Hemley, Phys. Rev. B 101, 134504 (2020)

    2020

  23. [30]

    Jiang, Y .-L

    M.-J. Jiang, Y .-L. Hai, H.-L. Tian, H.-B. Ding, Y .-J. Feng, C.-L. Yang, X.-J. Chen, and G.-H. Zhong, Phys. Rev. B 105, 104511 (2022)

    2022

  24. [31]

    Di Cataldo, C

    S. Di Cataldo, C. Heil, W. von der Linden, and L. Boeri, Phys. Rev. B 104, L020511 (2021)

    2021

  25. [32]

    Liang, A

    X. Liang, A. Bergara, X. Wei, X. Song, L. Wang, R. Sun, H. Liu, R. J. Hemley, L. Wang, G. Gao, et al. , Phys. Rev. B 104, 134501 (2021)

    2021

  26. [33]

    Belli and I

    F. Belli and I. Errea, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134509 (2022)

    2022

  27. [34]

    Y . Song, J. Bi, Y . Nakamoto, K. Shimizu, H. Liu, B. Zou, G. Liu, H. Wang, and Y . Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 266001 (2023)

    2023

  28. [35]

    K. Gao, W. Cui, J. Shi, A. P. Durajski, J. Hao, S. Botti, M. A. Marques, and Y . Li, Phys. Rev. B109, 014501 (2024)

    2024

  29. [36]

    Gao, X.-W

    M. Gao, X.-W. Yan, Z.-Y . Lu, and T. Xiang, Phys. Rev. B104, L100504 (2021)

    2021

  30. [37]

    S. Li, H. Wang, W. Sun, C. Lu, and F. Peng, Phys. Rev. B 105, 224107 (2022)

    2022

  31. [38]

    Sanna, T

    A. Sanna, T. F. Cerqueira, Y .-W. Fang, I. Errea, A. Ludwig, and M. A. Marques, NPJ Comput. Mater 10, 44 (2024)

    2024

  32. [39]

    Dolui, L

    K. Dolui, L. J. Conway, C. Heil, T. A. Strobel, R. P. Prasanku- mar, and C. J. Pickard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 166001 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    X. Song, X. Hao, X. Wei, X.-L. He, H. Liu, L. Ma, G. Liu, H. Wang, J. Niu, S. Wang,et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc (2024)

    2024

  34. [41]

    D. V . Semenok, A. G. Kvashnin, I. A. Kruglov, and A. R. Oganov, J. Phys. Chem. Lett 9, 1920 (2018)

    2018

  35. [42]

    Kokail, W

    C. Kokail, W. V on Der Linden, and L. Boeri, Phys. Rev. Mater 1, 074803 (2017)

    2017

  36. [43]

    X. Du, S. Zhang, J. Lin, X. Zhang, A. Bergara, and G. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 100, 134110 (2019)

    2019

  37. [44]

    Di Cataldo, W

    S. Di Cataldo, W. V on Der Linden, and L. Boeri, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014516 (2020)

    2020

  38. [45]

    X. Li, X. Zhang, A. Bergara, Y . Liu, and G. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174104 (2022)

    2022

  39. [46]

    Sukmas, P

    W. Sukmas, P. Tsuppayakorn-aek, P. Pluengphon, S. J. Clark, R. Ahuja, T. Bovornratanaraks, and W. Luo, INT J HYDRO- GEN ENERG 48, 4006 (2023)

    2023

  40. [47]

    Y . Wang, J. Lv, L. Zhu, and Y . Ma, Phys. Rev. B 82, 094116 (2010)

    2010

  41. [48]

    Y . Wang, J. Lv, L. Zhu, and Y . Ma, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2063 (2012)

    2012

  42. [49]

    B. Gao, P. Gao, S. Lu, J. Lv, Y . Wang, and Y . Ma, Sci. Bull.64, 301 (2019)

    2019

  43. [50]

    X. Shao, J. Lv, P. Liu, S. Shao, P. Gao, H. Liu, Y . Wang, and Y . Ma, J. Chem. Phys.156, 014105 (2022)

    2022

  44. [51]

    Parlinski, Z

    K. Parlinski, Z. Li, and Y . Kawazoe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4063 (1997)

    1997

  45. [52]

    A. Togo, F. Oba, and I. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B 78, 134106 (2008)

    2008

  46. [53]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm ¨uller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  47. [54]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  48. [55]

    J. P. Perdew, J. A. Chevary, S. H. V osko, K. A. Jackson, M. R. Pederson, D. J. Singh, and C. Fiolhais, Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671 (1992)

    1992

  49. [56]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  50. [57]

    A. D. Becke and K. E. Edgecombe, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5397 (1990)

    1990

  51. [58]

    R. F. Bader, Acc. Chem. Res. 18, 9 (1985)

    1985

  52. [59]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  53. [60]

    It contains the charges transfer, the electronic properties and phonon dispersions of other compounds at different pres- sure and structrue information of all the compounds, etc

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by pub- lisher]. It contains the charges transfer, the electronic properties and phonon dispersions of other compounds at different pres- sure and structrue information of all the compounds, etc

  54. [61]

    P. B. Allen and R. Dynes, Phys. Rev. B 12, 905 (1975)

    1975

  55. [62]

    Yao and R

    Y . Yao and R. Hoffmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc133, 21002 (2011)

    2011

  56. [63]

    Abe and N

    K. Abe and N. Ashcroft, Phys. Rev. B 84, 104118 (2011)

    2011

  57. [64]

    C.-H. Hu, A. R. Oganov, Q. Zhu, G.-R. Qian, G. Frapper, A. O. Lyakhov, and H.-Y . Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 165504 (2013)

    2013

  58. [65]

    Torabi, Y

    A. Torabi, Y . Song, and V . N. Staroverov, J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 2210 (2013)

    2013

  59. [66]

    A. M. Murcia Rios, D. N. Komsa, and V . N. Staroverov, J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 14781 (2018)

    2018

  60. [68]

    Li, W.-H

    W.-H. Li, W.-H. Yang, and W.-C. Lu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 25, 22032 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Eliashberg, Sov

    G. Eliashberg, Sov. Phys. JETP 11, 696 (1960)

    1960

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.