Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Beta-deformation in Twistor-String Theory

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The beta deformation of N=4 super-Yang-Mills is realized in twistor-string theory as a ghost-number-two BRST cohomology state in (psl(4|4)∧psl(4|4))_0/psl(4|4), deforming the B-model action by a current-current term.

desk verdict The question is right and the exposition is clear, but the Euler-sequence computation that anchors the main claim gives 45 in the CP^3 limit, not 90, so the central identification is unsecured. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19452 v2 pith:32GPJOZP submitted 2024-11-29 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Eggon Viana This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 81T6081T3081T45 PACS 11.25.-w11.30.Pb11.15.-q
keywords betadeformationtwistorstringtheoryN=4super-Yang-MillstopologicalB-modelBRSTcohomologyprojectivesuperspacecurrent-currentYang-Baxterequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the marginal $\beta$ deformation of $\mathcal{N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills theory appears inside the twistor string as a specific set of ghost-number-two states of the topological B-model on the compact super-twistor space $\mathbb{CP}^{3|4}$. These states, selected from the BRST cohomology by the Siegel gauge, live in the irreducible representation $(\mathfrak{psl}(4|4)\wedge\mathfrak{psl}(4|4))_0/\mathfrak{psl}(4|4)$ that defines the $\beta$-deformation multiplet. The paper then shows that the deformation changes the worldsheet action by a current-current term built from conserved $PSL(4|4)$ currents, with the BRST operator deformed to $Q_\beta=\bar{\partial}+[V_\beta^{(0)},-]$. If correct, this gives a worldsheet realization of the $\beta$ deformation and its Leigh-Strassler, $\gamma_i$, and non-commutative relatives within twistor-string theory, matching the earlier pure-spinor construction on $AdS_5\times S^5$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the cohomology of the B-model BRST operator $Q_B=\eta^{\bar i}\partial_{\bar\phi^{\bar i}}+d\phi^i\partial_{\rho^i}$ on the projective super-twistor space $\mathbb{CP}^{3|4}$; its physical states are $\bar\partial$-cohomology classes $H^0(\mathbb{CP}^{3|4},\wedge^q T\mathbb{CP}^{3|4})$. Ghost-number-one classes are global holomorphic vector fields and form the projective super-Lie algebra $\mathfrak{pgl}(4|4)$, supermatrices modulo the identity; ghost-number-two classes are antisymmetric bi-vector fields and form the quotient $\mathfrak{pgl}(4|4)\wedge\mathfrak{pgl}(4|4)/\mathfrak{pgl}(4|4)$. The Siegel gauge $b_0V=0$ then enforces the vanishing internal-commutator condition, projecting the multiplet to $(\mathfrak{psl}(4|4)\wedge\mathfrak{psl}(4|4))_0/\mathfrak{psl}(4|4)$, the defining representation of the $\beta$ deformation. The same b-ghost machinery, through the descent equations, converts the unintegrated vertex $V_\beta^{(0)}$ into the integrated two-form $V_\beta^{(2)}$, which is a current-current product and defines the deformed BRST operator $Q_\beta=\bar{\partial}+[V_\beta^{(0)},-]$.

What would settle it

Drop the reality condition (5.37) and compute the full ghost-number-two cohomology in the Siegel gauge: if the surviving vertex operators form only half of the $\beta$-deformation multiplet, the identification in the abstract fails for general complex $\beta$. Alternatively, compute the order-$\beta$ correction to a tree-level MHV amplitude from the deformed holomorphic Chern-Simons action with $Q_\beta$ replacing $\bar{\partial}$ and compare it with the known $\beta$-deformed amplitude; any mismatch would show that the vertex-operator map is not the $\beta$ deformation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the $\beta$ deformation is not an extra ingredient added to twistor-string theory but a part of its ghost-number-two BRST cohomology. Concretely, on $\mathbb{CP}^{3|4}$ the ghost-number-one cohomology is the projective superalgebra $\mathfrak{pgl}(4|4)$, and the ghost-number-two cohomology is the quotient $\mathfrak{pgl}(4|4)\wedge\mathfrak{pgl}(4|4)/\mathfrak{pgl}(4|4)$. Gauge-fixing with the b-ghost (the Siegel gauge) eliminates states with non-vanishing internal commutators, so the surviving ghost-number-two vertex operators lie in $(\mathfrak{psl}(4|4)\wedge\mathfrak{psl}(4|4))_0/\mathfrak{psl}(4|4)$, the same irreducible representation used to define $\beta$-deformation states in the pure-spinor string. Written in local coordinates, these vertex operators produce a deformed action $S_\beta=S_0+\int_\Sigma V_\beta^{(2)}$, where $V_\beta^{(2)}$ is a product of two conserved currents of the $PSL(4|4)$ symmetry; the deformed BRST operator takes the form $Q_\beta=\bar{\partial}+[V_\beta^{(0)},-]$, and its nilpotency requires the deformation matrix $B$ to satisfy the Classical Yang-Baxter equation. The paper notes that this identification assumes a reality condition on $B$; without it the twistor-string $\beta$ deformation is chiral and contains only half of the $\beta$-deformation states.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is the reality condition (5.37) equating the two index-symmetry pieces of the deformation tensor; without it the twistor-string beta deformation is chiral and contains only half of the beta-deformation states.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The beta-deformed twistor-string action is $S_\beta=S_0+\int_\Sigma V_\beta^{(2)}$, with $V_\beta^{(2)}$ built from two conserved $PSL(4|4)$ currents.
  • Nilpotency of the deformed BRST operator $Q_\beta=\bar{\partial}+[V_\beta^{(0)},-]$ forces $B$ to satisfy the Classical Yang-Baxter equation, placing the beta deformation inside the Yang-Baxter family of integrable deformations.
  • Specific choices of $B$ reproduce the Leigh-Strassler deformation and its three-parameter $\gamma_i$ version, with the deformation parameter identified with the tensor component $h_{123}$.
  • Twists built from translation, rotation, or mixed generators of the conformal algebra yield non-commutative Yang-Mills theories with star products, including the Groenewold-Moyal and quadratic twist-noncommutative cases.
  • In the open-string sector, replacing $\bar{\partial}$ by $Q_\beta$ in the holomorphic Chern-Simons action gives a deformed string field theory whose tree-level amplitudes can be computed with $Q_\beta$-closed wavefunctions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This suggests that the full space of current-current deformations of $N=4$ SYM could be classified by the ghost-number-two cohomology of $\mathbb{CP}^{3|4}$, a step the paper illustrates with examples but does not claim to complete.
  • The assumed reality condition (5.37) is the natural next target: if a geometric reality structure on twistor space supplies it, the chiral half-states would be completed into the full beta-deformation multiplet; the paper leaves this open.
  • Writing $Q_\beta=\bar{\partial}+[V_\beta^{(0)},-]$ frames the deformation as a Maurer-Cartan element in the dg Lie algebra of polyvector fields on $\mathbb{CP}^{3|4}$, so standard deformation-theory obstructions could test uniqueness and higher-order corrections beyond the linear order treated here.
  • Comparing the deformed holomorphic Chern-Simons amplitudes against known beta-deformed MHV results at order $\beta$ would provide an independent numerical test of the state identification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a worldsheet realization of the beta deformation of N=4 super-Yang-Mills in the topological B-model on CP^{3|4}. The author identifies the beta deformation with the representation (psl(4|4) \wedge psl(4|4))_0 / psl(4|4), computes ghost number two BRST cohomology via an Euler-sequence argument, applies Siegel gauge to project the vertex operators onto this representation, and writes a deformed action and a deformed BRST operator Q_beta = \bar{\partial} + [V_beta, -]. The paper also discusses applications to Leigh-Strassler, gamma_i, non-commutative, and Yang-Baxter deformations.

Significance. If correct, the construction would provide a compact twistor-string description of a broad class of integrable deformations, with an explicit current-current form and potential applications to holomorphic Chern-Simons amplitudes. The paper is clearly organized, reviews the pure-spinor motivation usefully, and contains explicit vertex operators and a candid discussion of the chirality issue in Section 5.2.2. However, the central cohomology identification appears to contain a dimension error that invalidates the claimed state space, so the significance of the paper as it stands is substantially reduced.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.19), (C.13)-(C.22)] The claimed isomorphism H^0(CP^{3|4}, \wedge^2 T) \cong pgl(4|4) \wedge pgl(4|4) / pgl(4|4) is not supported by the Euler-sequence computation. The long exact sequence of (C.11) gives H^0(\wedge^2 T) \cong H^0(O(2)) \otimes \wedge^2 C^{4|4} / H^0(T). In the bosonic limit CP^3, this quotient has dimension 10*6 - 15 = 45, whereas pgl(4) \wedge pgl(4) / pgl(4) has dimension 105 - 15 = 90. In the super case, the numerator H^0(O(2)) \otimes \wedge^2 C^{4|4} has dimension 32*28 = 896, and dividing by the 63-dimensional H^0(T) gives 833, not the 1890 dimensions of pgl(4|4) \wedge pgl(4|4) / pgl(4|4). The step from (C.17) to (C.22) identifies the space of sections of \wedge^2 O(1)^{\oplus 4|4} with the exterior square of the space of linear vector fields, but the natural map between these spaces has a large kernel. The central representation claim therefore needs to be recomputed.
  2. [Sec. 5.2.2, Eq. (5.37)] The identification with the full beta deformation depends on the reality condition (5.37), which is assumed rather than derived. The paper itself states in Section 5.2.2 that without this condition the twistor-string deformation is chiral and contains only half of the beta-deformation states. This is not a minor caveat: the abstract presents the identification with the beta deformation as the main result, and the corrected cohomology of the previous comment appears to describe precisely one chiral half. The reality condition needs a physical or geometric derivation before the central claim can be accepted.
  3. [Sec. 5.2, Eqs. (5.15)-(5.16)] The restriction from pgl \wedge pgl to psl \wedge psl is imposed by hand through the traceless conditions (5.16) before the Siegel-gauge analysis, rather than derived from the gauge condition. The b0 computations in (5.20)-(5.27) produce only the internal-commutator constraints (5.34); they do not produce the trace conditions. In particular, the statement in (5.18) that the trace contraction 'automatically gives zero' relies on (5.16), so it is not an independent derivation. Since the beta deformation is defined for psu(2,2|4), the removal of the J \otimes psl part of the decomposition (5.12) needs an independent justification.
  4. [Sec. 6, Eqs. (6.6)-(6.13)] The deformed BRST operator Q_beta is introduced through descent equations that are asserted to hold only up to equations of motion, but the correction terms in (6.6)-(6.8) are not derived. The nilpotency of Q_beta for B satisfying the classical Yang-Baxter equation (6.12)-(6.13) is stated without proof. Since Q_beta defines the deformed theory and is used in the holomorphic Chern-Simons proposal (7.13), this needs a complete argument rather than an assertion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 5.2.2, after Eq. (5.37)] The text contains the typo 'Thenrefore'; it should read 'Therefore'.
  2. [Sec. 7.2] The phrase 'It wight be interesting' should read 'It might be interesting'.
  3. [Appendix B, around Eq. (B.14)] The text refers to a block matrix labeled '(B.14)', but no matrix is displayed; the reference appears to be empty.
  4. [Sec. 6.1, Eq. (6.15)] The notation {b, \bar{b}, V} for multiple OPE single poles is not defined; the contour-integral or OPE meaning should be spelled out.
  5. [Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.20)] The notation t_{(I_1...I_n)}^{[J_1...J_n]} is introduced without explaining the (anti)symmetrization conventions in the super case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the B-model cohomology and Siegel-gauge computation are independent of the defining representation from [5]; the known mathematical and reality-condition concerns are correctness issues, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is not circular in the sense defined here. Section 2 adopts the representation (g∧g)_0/g as the definition of the beta deformation, citing [5]; this is an input, not a derived prediction. Section 4 computes H^0(CP^{3|4}, ∧^2T) via the Euler sequence and claims the isomorphism to pgl∧pgl/pgl (eqs. 4.19 and C.22); whether or not that computation is correct (the bosonic CP^3 dimension count in Appendix C suggests 45, not 90, so the identification is questionable), it is an independent cohomological claim and is not obtained by substituting the definition of beta-deformation. Section 5 then imposes the standard Siegel gauge b0V=0 and derives the constraints (5.33)-(5.34), which coincide with the defining condition (g∧g)_0; this coincidence is the paper's result, not a tautology. The Leigh-Strassler identification in Section 7 sets h^{123}=β by hand to match the known deformation, which is an application rather than a fitted prediction. The self-admitted limitation in Section 5.2.2 (eq. 5.37 reality condition) means the full beta-deformation claim is not yet derived without an extra assumption; that is a completeness/correctness caveat, not a circular step. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present ([7] is the author's own paper but is not used to justify the central representation claim).

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data are fitted and no new physical entities are introduced. The load-bearing inputs are structural assumptions about the B-model, the cohomological description, the Siegel gauge, the descent equations, and the reality condition. The deformation matrix B is a free parameter of the construction but is not fitted to numbers.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Physical states of the B-model on CP^{3|4} are elements of H^p(CP^{3|4}, ∧^q T CP^{3|4}), and only p=0 cohomology contributes for ghost numbers 1 and 2.
    Invoked in Section 4, equations (4.4)-(4.6), relying on Witten's twistor string formulation [9]. The restriction to the compact projective space is what makes the representations finite-dimensional.
  • domain assumption The Euler short exact sequence and the vanishing cohomologies H^1(O)=0 and H^1(T)=0 hold for the super projective space CP^{3|4}.
    Used in Appendix C to compute H^0(T) and H^0(∧^2 T), citing Noja [21]. The super-version is nontrivial but is accepted as standard in this literature.
  • domain assumption The Siegel gauge condition b0 V=0 selects primary vertex operators, and for ghost number two it imposes the constraints B_{AB} f^C_{AB} = 0.
    Section 5.2.1, equations (5.17)-(5.29). The step from b-ghost OPE poles to Lie algebra commutator constraints is the mechanism that places vertices in (psl∧psl)_0.
  • domain assumption The descent equations dV_β^{(0)} = QV_β^{(1)} and dV_β^{(1)} = QV_β^{(2)} hold up to equations of motion, so V_β^{(2)} deforms the action.
    Section 6, equations (6.1)-(6.8). This is standard for topological sigma models following BCOV [23], but the specific solution using {b, [bar b, V]} is stated without a complete derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper The reality condition (5.37) relates the two chiral halves of the deformation tensor.
    Section 5.2.2. Without this condition the paper's vertices contain only half of the beta-deformation states, so the central identification depends on this assumed condition.
  • ad hoc to paper The deformed BRST operator Q_β is nilpotent when B satisfies the classical Yang-Baxter equation.
    Section 6, equations (6.11)-(6.12), stated as 'One can see' with no proof. This is a load-bearing property for the deformed model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Beta-deformation in Twistor-String Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/32GPJOZP

@misc{pith2026241119452,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Beta-deformation in Twistor-String Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/32GPJOZP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19452}
}
abstract

In this work, we investigate how the marginal beta deformation of the ${N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills theory manifests within the context of the topological B-model in the twistor space $\mathbb{CP}^{3|4}$. We begin by identifying the beta deformation as states living in a specific irreducible representation of the superconformal algebra. Then, we compute the ghost number two elements of the BRST cohomology of the topological model. A gauge-fixing procedure is applied to these states, allowing us to identify the elements living in the irreducible representation that characterizes the beta deformation. Based on this identification, we proceed to write the deformed topological action, and the corresponding deformed BRST operator.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Leigh and M.J

    R.G. Leigh and M.J. Strassler, Exactly marginal operators and duality in four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory , Nucl. Phys. B 447 (1995) 95 [ hep-th/9503121]

    arXiv 1995

  2. [2]

    Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv

    J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [ hep-th/9711200]. – 34 –

    arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Lunin and J.M

    O. Lunin and J.M. Maldacena, Deforming field theories with U(1) x U(1) global symmetry and their gravity duals , JHEP 05 (2005) 033 [ hep-th/0502086]

    arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Bedoya, L.I

    O.A. Bedoya, L.I. Bevil´ aqua, A. Mikhailov and V.O. Rivelles, Notes on β-deformations of the pure spinor superstring in , Nuclear Physics B 848 (2011) 155

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Yang-Baxter Deformations of the $AdS_{5}\times S^{5}$ Pure Spinor Superstring

    H.A. Ben ´ ıtez and V.O. Rivelles,Yang-Baxter deformations of the AdS5 × S5 pure spinor superstring, JHEP 02 (2019) 056 [ 1807.10432]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    Beta deformed sigma model and strong deformation coupling limit

    E. Viana, Beta deformed sigma model and strong deformation coupling limit , JHEP 09 (2024) 120 [ 2312.15557]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Berkovits and E

    N. Berkovits and E. Witten, Conformal supergravity in twistor-string theory , Journal of High Energy Physics 2004 (2004) 009

    work page 2004

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Witten, Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space , Communications in Mathematical Physics 252 (2004) 189

    E. Witten, Perturbative gauge theory as a string theory in twistor space , Communications in Mathematical Physics 252 (2004) 189

    2004

  2. [10]

    Kulaxizi and K

    M. Kulaxizi and K. Zoubos, Marginal deformations of N=4 SYM from open/closed twistor strings, Nucl. Phys. B 738 (2006) 317 [ hep-th/0410122]

    2006 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Gao and J.-B

    P. Gao and J.-B. Wu, (Non)-supersymmetric marginal deformations from twistor string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 798 (2008) 184 [ hep-th/0611128]

    2008 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Mikhailov, Symmetries of massless vertex operators in AdS(5) x S**5 , J

    A. Mikhailov, Symmetries of massless vertex operators in AdS(5) x S**5 , J. Geom. Phys. 62 (2012) 479 [ 0903.5022]

    2012 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Berkovits, Covariant quantization of the superparticle using pure spinors , Journal of High Energy Physics 2001 (2001) 016–016

    N. Berkovits, Covariant quantization of the superparticle using pure spinors , Journal of High Energy Physics 2001 (2001) 016–016

    2001

  6. [14]

    Kim, L.J

    H.J. Kim, L.J. Romans and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, The Mass Spectrum of Chiral N=2 D=10 Supergravity on S**5, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 389

    1985

  7. [15]

    Mili´ an,Supermultiplet of β−deformations from twistors , Int

    S.P. Mili´ an,Supermultiplet of β−deformations from twistors , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32 (2017) 1750157 [1607.06506]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Witten, Mirror manifolds and topological field theory , AMS/IP Stud

    E. Witten, Mirror manifolds and topological field theory , AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math. 9 (1998) 121 [hep-th/9112056]

    1998 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Berkovits and O

    N. Berkovits and O. Chand ´ ıa,Superstring vertex operators in an AdS5 × S5 background, Nuclear Physics B 596 (2001) 185

    2001

  10. [18]

    Witten, Topological Sigma Models, Commun

    E. Witten, Topological Sigma Models, Commun. Math. Phys. 118 (1988) 411

    1988

  11. [19]

    Hofman, On the open closed B model , JHEP 11 (2003) 069 [ hep-th/0204157]

    C. Hofman, On the open closed B model , JHEP 11 (2003) 069 [ hep-th/0204157]

    2003 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Witten, Chern-Simons gauge theory as a string theory , Prog

    E. Witten, Chern-Simons gauge theory as a string theory , Prog. Math. 133 (1995) 637 [hep-th/9207094]

    1995 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Noja, Supergeometry of Π-projective spaces, J

    S. Noja, Supergeometry of Π-projective spaces, J. Geom. Phys. 124 (2018) 286 [ 1706.01359]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Lian and G.J

    B.H. Lian and G.J. Zuckerman, New perspectives on the BRST-algebraic structure of string theory, Communications in Mathematical Physics 154 (1993) 613

    1993

  15. [23]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes , Commun. Math. Phys. 165 (1994) 311 [hep-th/9309140]. – 35 –

    1994 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Borsato, Lecture notes on current–current deformations , Eur

    R. Borsato, Lecture notes on current–current deformations , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 648 [2312.13847]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Hoare, Integrable deformations of sigma models , J

    B. Hoare, Integrable deformations of sigma models , J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 093001 [2109.14284]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Cole, R.A

    L.T. Cole, R.A. Cullinan, B. Hoare, J. Liniado and D.C. Thompson, Integrable deformations from twistor space, SciPost Phys. 17 (2024) 008 [ 2311.17551]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Berkovits and R.S

    N. Berkovits and R.S. Pitombo, 4D Chern-Simons and the pure spinor AdS5 ×S5 superstring, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 106015 [ 2401.03976]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Costello and D

    K. Costello and D. Gaiotto, Twisted Holography, 1812.09257

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Cacciatori and S

    S.L. Cacciatori and S. Noja, Projective superspaces in practice, Journal of Geometry and Physics 130 (2018) 40

    2018

  22. [30]

    Fokken, C

    J. Fokken, C. Sieg and M. Wilhelm, Non-conformality of γi-deformed N = 4 SYM theory , J. Phys. A 47 (2014) 455401 [ 1308.4420]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Delduc, M

    F. Delduc, M. Magro and B. Vicedo, An integrable deformation of the AdS5 × S5 superstring action, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 051601 [ 1309.5850]

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    van Tongeren, Yang–Baxter deformations, AdS/CFT, and twist-noncommutative gauge theory, Nucl

    S.J. van Tongeren, Yang–Baxter deformations, AdS/CFT, and twist-noncommutative gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B 904 (2016) 148 [ 1506.01023]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Meier and S.J

    T. Meier and S.J. van Tongeren, Gauge theory on twist-noncommutative spaces , JHEP 12 (2023) 045 [ 2305.15470]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Delduc, M

    F. Delduc, M. Magro and B. Vicedo, On classical q-deformations of integrable sigma-models , JHEP 11 (2013) 192 [ 1308.3581]

    2013 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Klimcik, Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality , JHEP 12 (2002) 051 [hep-th/0210095]

    C. Klimcik, Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality , JHEP 12 (2002) 051 [hep-th/0210095]

    2002 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Klimcik, On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model , J

    C. Klimcik, On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model , J. Math. Phys. 50 (2009) 043508 [0802.3518]

    2009 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Pasquarella, Advancements in Functorial Homological Mirror Symmetry , 2502.06951

    V. Pasquarella, Advancements in Functorial Homological Mirror Symmetry , 2502.06951

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Pasquarella, Dualities and Categorical Structures from 2D Up , Ph.D

    V. Pasquarella, Dualities and Categorical Structures from 2D Up , Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge U., 2024. 2406.11964. 10.17863/CAM.109212

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Cole, R.A

    L.T. Cole, R.A. Cullinan, B. Hoare, J. Liniado and D.C. Thompson, Gauging the diamond: integrable coset models from twistor space , JHEP 12 (2024) 202 [ 2407.09479]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Meier and S.J

    T. Meier and S.J. van Tongeren, Quadratic Twist-Noncommutative Gauge Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 121603 [ 2301.08757]. – 36 –

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.