Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 43 references

Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature due to multiband effect in the topological nodal-line semimetal Pb$_{1-x}$Sn$_{x}$TaSe$_{2}$

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that tin doping raises the superconducting transition temperature of PbTaSe2 by creating new three-dimensional Fermi pockets that activate interband coupling and strengthen electron-phonon coupling, rather than by the…

desk verdict A careful doping study with a plausible but under-evidenced multiband mechanism; the experimental dataset is worth refereeing, the DFT extrapolation needs flagging. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19932 v3 pith:QI5TRWPC submitted 2024-11-29 cond-mat.supr-con

K. Kumarasinghe , A. Rahman , M. Tomlinson , D. Le , F. Joshua , L. Zhai , Y. Nakajima This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords PbTaSe2Sndopingtopologicalnodal-linesemimetalmultibandsuperconductivitytwo-gapspecificheatspin-orbitgapFermisurfacereconstructionelectron-phononcoupling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that substituting tin for lead in the layered superconductor PbTaSe$_2$ raises the superconducting transition temperature $T_c$ from 3.6–4.0 K to about 5.1 K, even though the substitution introduces substantial disorder. The authors argue that this increase is not the ordinary atomic-mass effect: replacing heavy Pb with lighter Sn should raise $T_c$ only slightly, but the measured electron-phonon coupling grows about three times more than the mass change predicts. The missing contribution, they claim, is multiband. Specific heat for moderately tin-doped crystals cannot be described by a single superconducting gap and requires two gaps, and density-functional calculations show that tin doping shrinks the spin-orbit gap and creates new three-dimensional Fermi pockets. Activating these pockets turns on interband coupling, which strengthens the effective electron-phonon coupling and raises $T_c$.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the multiband $\alpha$-model for the specific heat combined with spin-orbit-controlled Fermi-surface reconstruction. In the two-gap fit, total specific heat is a weighted sum of two independent BCS-gap contributions, $C = wC_1 + (1-w)C_2$, with weights set by the partial Sommerfeld coefficients; this reproduces the doped data only when a second, small gap carries a substantial share of the density of states. The companion density-functional calculations identify what creates that second band: a reduced spin-orbit gap under Sn substitution makes new three-dimensional Fermi pockets appear near the H points, and interband coupling between the original and new pockets is the proposed route to a larger effective $\lambda$ and hence a higher $T_c$.

What would settle it

Look for the emergent three-dimensional pocket near the H point in crystals with $x\approx 0.08$ and $x\approx 0.15$ using quantum oscillations or angle-resolved photoemission; if no such pocket exists, the multiband explanation for the two-gap specific heat and the $T_c$ increase is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Sn substitution in Pb$_{1-x}$Sn$_x$TaSe$_2$ induces a topological band-structure change: reducing the spin-orbit coupling closes part of the spin-orbit gap near the K and H points, turning the quasi-two-dimensional Fermi surfaces of undoped PbTaSe$_2$ into three-dimensional trigonal-bipyramid-like pockets. The paper claims these emergent pockets activate multiband superconductivity, and the interband coupling then enhances the effective electron-phonon coupling constant and increases $T_c$ (citing the theorem that multiband superconductors have enhanced critical temperatures). This mechanism explains why the resistance-derived $T_c$ rises to 5.1 K while the crystal becomes fifty times dirtier, why the specific-heat jump falls below the BCS value and requires a two-gap model with a large gap $2\Delta_1/k_BT_c\approx 3.9$ and a small gap $\approx 0.9$, and why the mass-only estimate of $\lambda$ accounts for only about a third of the observed enhancement.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the three-dimensional Fermi pockets shown by calculation at $x=0.25$ already being present at $x=0.08$ and $x=0.15$, because that is where the two-gap specific heat is measured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In Pb$_{1-x}$Sn$_x$TaSe$_2$, superconductivity survives a fifty-fold increase in residual resistivity, so the pairing is stable against disorder and unlikely to be odd-parity dominated.
  • The large gap in the two-gap fits is nearly doping independent ($2\Delta_1/k_BT_c\approx 3.9$), while the small gap stays near $0.9$; what changes with doping is the relative density of states of the two bands.
  • The $T_c$ enhancement is a band-structure effect: tuning the spin-orbit gap, not just the atomic mass, controls the superconducting temperature in this family.
  • Because the new Fermi pockets appear below $x=0.25$, the crossover from single-gap to two-gap behavior should be observable as a continuous evolution starting at modest tin concentrations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is right, direct Fermi-surface probes such as quantum oscillations or angle-resolved photoemission on crystals with $x\approx 0.08$ should reveal a small three-dimensional pocket whose presence and volume track the two-gap behavior.
  • The multiband route predicts that the second gap's weight, rather than its size, carries the $T_c$ increase; tunnelling or penetration-depth measurements across the doping series could separate that prediction from a single-band coupling increase.
  • The same spin-orbit-gap tuning argument suggests that other isovalent substitutions or applied pressure that shrink the spin-orbit gap in noncentrosymmetric superconductors could produce similar $T_c$ enhancements, making this a materials-design rule beyond the specific compound.
  • Since the paper leaves quantum-geometric contributions open, a testable extension is that $\lambda$ should not scale simply with the new pocket volume; strain or doping variations that change band geometry while leaving the Fermi surface fixed would then still affect $T_c$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports resistivity and specific heat measurements on single crystals of Pb1-xSnxTaSe2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.23). The authors find that Sn substitution raises the superconducting transition temperature from about 3.6 K to about 5.1 K while simultaneously increasing disorder, as evidenced by a roughly 50-fold increase in residual resistivity and a drop in RRR from about 209 to about 9.5. For x = 0 and x = 0.018, the specific heat jump at Tc exceeds the BCS weak-coupling value of 1.43, and the data are well described by a single-gap α model with 2Δ0/kBTc ≈ 3.8–3.9. For x = 0.08 and x = 0.15, the specific heat jump is below 1.43, and a two-gap α model with a large gap of 2Δ1/kBTc ≈ 3.9, a small gap of 2Δ2/kBTc ≈ 0.9, and weight ratios γ1:γ2 = 55:45 and 72:28 reproduces the data. DFT calculations at x = 0, 0.25, and 1 show that the Fermi surface evolves from quasi-two-dimensional near the K-H lines in PbTaSe2 to three-dimensional with trigonal-bipyramid-like pockets near H in SnTaSe2 and already in Pb0.75Sn0.25TaSe2. The authors attribute the Tc enhancement to interband coupling activated by these emergent pockets, and they use the McMillan formula to argue that the mass effect alone is too small to explain the increase in λ.

Significance. If the causal chain is established, this would be a valuable example of doping-induced multiband superconductivity enhancing Tc in a noncentrosymmetric topological nodal-line material. The strength of the paper is that the central experimental observation—the monotonic enhancement of the bulk Tc with Sn doping—is independent of any model, and the two-gap analysis is presented with quantitative parameters. The DFT Fermi-surface comparison between the endpoints and x = 0.25 is a useful qualitative guide, and the data are made openly available. The main weakness is that the link between the emergent 3D pockets and the multiband specific-heat behavior at x = 0.08 and 0.15 is not directly demonstrated: the DFT is not performed at those doping levels, and the two-gap fits are not tested against alternative single-gap scenarios. Because the central claim depends on this link, the manuscript needs additional evidence or a more carefully qualified interpretation before publication.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 6] The DFT evidence for emergent three-dimensional Fermi pockets is obtained only for x = 0, x = 0.25, and x = 1. The two-gap specific-heat behavior that motivates the multiband scenario is observed at x = 0.08 and x = 0.15 (Fig. 5d,e). The statement that the dimensionality evolution 'must begin at a doping level x < 0.25' is an extrapolation from the calculated x = 0.25 result; it does not establish that the pockets are present at x = 0.08 or 0.15, where the superconductivity data require them. If the pockets emerge only near x = 0.25, the two-gap behavior at lower doping would need a different explanation, and the attribution of the Tc enhancement to multiband effects would be unsupported. Direct evidence at the intermediate doping levels—for example, DFT supercells at x ≈ 0.1–0.15, or experimental probes such as quantum oscillations or ARPES—is needed to close this gap.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 5d,e] The two-gap α model is fitted to the same specific-heat data used to infer the multiband state, with three free parameters (2Δ1/kBTc, 2Δ2/kBTc, and the weight ratio γ1:γ2), and no comparison is made to alternative single-band explanations such as a single anisotropic gap, a distribution of Tc values, or strong-coupling corrections. The conclusion that a single-gap model is excluded is therefore only demonstrated against the specific isotropic α model used here. In addition, the highest-Tc sample (x = 0.23) is not analyzed with the two-gap model, so the paper does not show that the maximum Tc enhancement coincides with the multiband state. An independent thermodynamic or spectroscopic probe of the gap structure at x = 0.08 and 0.15, or at minimum a quantitative comparison of fit residuals against a single anisotropic-gap model, would substantially strengthen the central claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'indivisually' in the Fig. 1 caption, 'dimentional' in the Fig. 6 caption, 'Interstingly' in Section III, and 'temperatur e' in the header/abstract. These should be corrected.
  2. [Section III, Eq. (5)] The McMillan analysis uses μ* = 0.13 with a quoted range of 0.10–0.15, but no sensitivity analysis is shown. Since the inferred λ values and the conclusion that the mass effect is insufficient depend on this choice, a brief discussion of the uncertainty would be helpful.
  3. [Fig. 5] The text reports only central values for the two-gap parameters. Stating the fitting temperature range and providing confidence intervals or residuals would allow the reader to judge the quality and uniqueness of the fits.
  4. [Section III] For x = 0.23 the resistive Tc reaches 5.1 K, but specific-heat data and fits are presented only up to x = 0.15. A sentence explaining whether the x = 0.23 sample was measured by specific heat and, if so, why it is not included in Fig. 5 would remove an apparent gap in the doping series.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Tc enhancement is measured, the two-gap fit is used transparently as a model comparison, and the DFT and McMillan analyses rest on independent inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that Sn doping enhances Tc through emergent three-dimensional Fermi pockets and multiband superconductivity. This is an interpretive chain built on measured data and independent calculations, not a derivation equivalent to its inputs. The two-gap model is fitted to specific heat data at x = 0.08 and 0.15 and is used to show that a single-gap model cannot reproduce the data; this is standard model comparison, and the paper does not claim to predict Tc from the fitted gaps. The McMillan analysis computes lambda from measured Tc and Debye temperature with stated assumptions (mu* = 0.13), and compares it to a mass-only estimate; this is a transparent use of measured inputs rather than a hidden fitted parameter posing as a prediction. The DFT calculations at x = 0, 0.25, and 1 provide independent first-principles evidence for the emergence of three-dimensional pockets; the extension to lower doping is an extrapolation and a robustness concern, not circularity. No load-bearing self-citation is present: the cited two-gap model, multiband theorem, and prior PbTaSe2 studies are from external groups, and the author list does not overlap with those references. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks (BCS value, prior thermodynamic and muSR results), so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mechanism (multiband enhancement of Tc) rests on fitted two-gap parameters and on DFT calculations at a single intermediate doping. The McMillan analysis introduces a chosen μ*. No new physical entities are postulated beyond the fitted superconducting gaps and the emergent Fermi pockets predicted by DFT.

free parameters (5)
  • Large gap 2Δ1/kBTc for x=0.08 and 0.15 = 3.9 for both
    Fitted in the two-gap α model to specific heat data of Pb0.92Sn0.08TaSe2 and Pb0.85Sn0.15TaSe2.
  • Small gap 2Δ2/kBTc = 0.91 (x=0.08), 0.89 (x=0.15)
    Fitted in the two-gap model; these small gaps are essential to reproduce the reduced specific heat jump.
  • Weight ratio γ1:γ2 = 55:45 (x=0.08), 72:28 (x=0.15)
    Fitted relative density-of-states contributions of the two bands.
  • Coulomb pseudopotential μ* in McMillan formula = 0.13
    Chosen in the range 0.10-0.15 to estimate λ from Tc and ΘD; the resulting λ values (0.73, 0.80) depend on this choice.
  • Single-gap Δ0 for undoped and x=0.018 = 2Δ0/kBTc = 3.9, 3.8, 3.9 respectively
    Fitted to specific heat using the α model for pure PbTaSe2 and the x=0.018 sample.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The α model (BCS thermodynamics with a temperature-dependent gap) correctly describes the specific heat of a single-band superconductor in weak coupling.
    The paper uses Eqs. (3)-(4) and the empirical gap temperature dependence (refs 34,35) to fit specific heat without deriving them.
  • domain assumption The two-gap model is a weighted sum of independent α-model contributions (C = wC1 + (1-w)C2), neglecting interband coupling and its effect on thermodynamics.
    This is the standard phenomenological MgB2 model (ref 33), used here without modification.
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA with spin-orbit coupling gives a reliable band structure and Fermi surface for Pb1-xSnxTaSe2 at the studied doping levels.
    DFT is performed at x=0, 1, and 0.25 only; the intermediate dopings are interpolated and extrapolated.
  • domain assumption The McMillan formula (Eq. 5) with a single λ adequately estimates the electron-phonon coupling from Tc and ΘD.
    The paper uses this to infer an increase in λ from 0.73 to 0.80, though the formula is approximate and the choice of μ* matters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature due to multiband effect in the topological nodal-line semimetal Pb$_{1-x}$Sn$_{x}$TaSe$_{2}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QI5TRWPC

@misc{pith2026241119932,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature due to multiband effect in the topological nodal-line semimetal Pb$_1-x$Sn$_x$TaSe$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QI5TRWPC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19932}
}
abstract

We report a systematic study of the normal-state and superconducting properties of single crystal Pb$_{1-x}$Sn$_{x}$TaSe$_{2}$ $(0\leq x \leq 0.23)$. Sn doping enhances the superconducting temperature $T_{c}$ up to 5.1 K while also significantly increasing impurity scattering in the crystals. For $x=0$ and 0.018, the specific heat jump at $T_{c}$ exceeds the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) weak-coupling value of 1.43, indicating the realization of strong-coupling superconductivity in undoped and slightly Sn-doped PbTaSe$_{2}$. Substituting Pb with more Sn lowers the specific heat jump at $T_{c}$ below the BCS value of 1.43, which cannot be explained by a single-gap model. Rather, the observed specific heat data of moderately Sn-doped PbTaSe$_{2}$ ($x= 0.08$ and 0.15) are reproduced by a two-gap model. Our density functional theory calculations suggest that three-dimensional Fermi pockets appear due to a reduction of the spin-orbit gap with Sn doping, and the multiband effect arising from these emergent Fermi pockets enhances the effective electron-phonon coupling strength, leading to the increase in $T_{c}$ of Pb$_{1-x}$Sn$_{x}$TaSe$_{2}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19932 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) X-ray diffraction pattern for Pb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Overall temperature dependence of the in-plane re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Superconducting transition temperatures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Normalized electronic specific heat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Band structures of (a) PbTaSe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bauer, G

    E. Bauer, G. Hilscher, H. Michor, C. Paul, E. W. Scheidt, A. Gribanov, Y. Seropegin, H. Noël, M. Sigrist, and P. Rogl, Heavy Fermion Superconductivity and Magnetic Order in Noncentrosymmetric CePt3Si, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 027003 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    For PbTaSe 2, su- perconductivity occurs at Tc = 4.02 K, which is slightly higher than the previously reported values of 3.6-3.8 K from the resistivity measurements [ 8, 15, 28]

    Tc were determined by the midpoint of the resistive transition. For PbTaSe 2, su- perconductivity occurs at Tc = 4.02 K, which is slightly higher than the previously reported values of 3.6-3.8 K from the resistivity measurements [ 8, 15, 28]. We plot Tc obtained from the resistivity measurements as a function of the Sn doping concentration x in FIG. 3 (a)...

    work page

  3. [3]

    This yields the superconducting gap ampli- tude 2∆0/kBTc = 2 .9 for x = 0 .08 and 2∆0/kBTc = 3 .3 for x = 0 .15, both of which are smaller than the BCS weak-coupling value of 3.53

    We calculate the normalized specific heat using the single-gap α model to reproduce the observed small jumps at Tc for x = 0 .08 and 0.15. This yields the superconducting gap ampli- tude 2∆0/kBTc = 2 .9 for x = 0 .08 and 2∆0/kBTc = 3 .3 for x = 0 .15, both of which are smaller than the BCS weak-coupling value of 3.53. As shown in FIGs. 5(d) and (e), the ca...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The nearly identical specific heat data observed in undoped samples with RRR = 127 and 209 strongly suggest that the pres- 5 FIG. 5. Ce(T )/γnT vs T /Tc for (a) x = 0 (RRR=209), (b) x = 0 (RRR=127), (c) x = 0 .018, (d) x = 0 .080, and (e) x = 0 .15. The red solid curves are the fits to each data set using the two-gap model. For x = 0 and 0.018, the blue das...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Kimura, K

    N. Kimura, K. Ito, H. Aoki, S. Uji, and T. Terashima, Extremely High Upper Critical Magnetic Field of the Noncentrosymmetric Heavy Fermion Superconductor CeRhSi3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 197001 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    H. Q. Yuan, D. F. Agterberg, N. Hayashi, P. Badica, D. Vandervelde, K. Togano, M. Sigrist, and M. B. Salamon, S-Wave Spin-Triplet Order in Superconduc- tors without Inversion Symmetry: Li2Pd3B and Li2Pt3B, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 017006 (2006)

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Nishiyama, Y

    M. Nishiyama, Y. Inada, and G.-q. Zheng, Spin Triplet Superconducting State due to Broken Inversion Symme- try in Li2Pt3B, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 047002 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    J. Chen, M. B. Salamon, S. Akutagawa, J. Akimitsu, J. Singleton, J. L. Zhang, L. Jiao, and H. Q. Yuan, Evi- dence of nodal gap structure in the noncentrosymmetric superconductor Y2C3, Phys. Rev. B 83, 144529 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Harada, J

    S. Harada, J. J. Zhou, Y. G. Yao, Y. Inada, and G.-q. Zheng, Abrupt enhancement of noncentrosym- metry and appearance of a spin-triplet supercon- ducting state in Li 2(Pd1−xPtx)3B beyond x = 0 .8, Phys. Rev. B 86, 220502 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y. Ando, Topological superconductors: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076501 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Zhang, Z

    C.-L. Zhang, Z. Yuan, G. Bian, S.-Y. Xu, X. Zhang, M. Z. Hasan, and S. Jia, Superconducting properties in sin- gle crystals of the topological nodal semimetal PbTaSe2, Phys. Rev. B 93, 054520 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    J. Wang, X. Xu, N. Zhou, L. Li, X. Cao, J. Yang, Y. Li, C. Cao, J. Dai, J. Zhang, Z. Shi, B. Chen, and Z. Yang, Upward Curvature of the Upper Crit- ical Field and the V-Shaped Pressure Dependence of Tcin the Noncentrosymmetric Superconductor PbTaSe2, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2...

    2015

  5. [13]

    M. N. Ali, Q. D. Gibson, T. Klimczuk, and R. J. Cava, Noncentrosymmetric superconductor with a bulk three- dimensional Dirac cone gapped by strong spin-orbit cou- pling, Phys. Rev. B 89, 020505 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    M. X. Wang, Y. Xu, L. P. He, J. Zhang, X. C. Hong, P. L. Cai, Z. B. Wang, J. K. Dong, and S. Y. Li, Node- less superconducting gaps in noncentrosymmetric super- conductor PbTaSe2 with topological bulk nodal lines, Phys. Rev. B 93, 020503 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    G. M. Pang, M. Smidman, L. X. Zhao, Y. F. Wang, Z. F. Weng, L. Q. Che, Y. Chen, X. Lu, G. F. Chen, and H. Q. Yuan, Nodeless superconductiv- ity in noncentrosymmetric PbTaSe2 single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 93, 060506 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    M. N. Wilson, A. M. Hallas, Y. Cai, S. Guo, Z. Gong, R. Sankar, F. C. Chou, Y. J. Uemura, and G. M. Luke, µSR study of the noncentrosymmetric superconductor PbTaSe2, Phys. Rev. B 95, 224506 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    Chang, P.-J

    T.-R. Chang, P.-J. Chen, G. Bian, S.-M. Huang, H. Zheng, T. Neupert, R. Sankar, S.-Y. Xu, I. Belopol- ski, G. Chang, B. Wang, F. Chou, A. Bansil, H.-T. Jeng, H. Lin, and M. Z. Hasan, Topological Dirac sur- face states and superconducting pairing correlations in PbTaSe2, Phys. ...

    2016

  10. [18]

    Bian, T.-R

    G. Bian, T.-R. Chang, R. Sankar, S.-Y. Xu, H. Zheng, T. Neupert, C.-K. Chiu, S.-M. Huang, G. Chang, I. Be- lopolski, et al. , Topological nodal-line fermions in spin- orbit metal PbTaSe2, Nat. Commun. 7, 1 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting Proximity Effect and Majorana Fermions at the Surface of a Topological Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008)

    2008

  12. [20]

    Chen, T.-R

    P.-J. Chen, T.-R. Chang, and H.-T. Jeng, Ab initio study of the PbTaSe2-related superconducting topological met- als, Phys. Rev. B 94, 165148 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    O. J. Taylor, A. Carrington, and J. A. Schlueter, Specific-Heat Measurements of the 9 Gap Structure of the Organic Superconductors κ−(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br and κ−(ET)2Cu(NCS)2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 057001 (2007)

    2007

  14. [22]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative scheme s for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  15. [23]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  16. [24]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  17. [25]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseu- dopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  18. [26]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  19. [27]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Erra- tum: Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997)

    1997

  20. [28]

    A. M. Ganose, A. Searle, A. Jain, and S. M. Griffin, IFermi: A python library for Fermi surface generation and analysis, Journal of Open Source Software 6, 3089 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Zheng, VaspBandUnfolding,

    Q. Zheng, VaspBandUnfolding,

  22. [30]

    X. Yang, M. Wang, Y. Li, H. Bai, J. Ma, X. Sun, Q. Tao, C. Dong, and Z.-A. Xu, Superconduc- tivity in a misfit compound (PbSe) 1.12(TaSe2), Superconductor Science and Technology 31, 125010 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Sankar, G

    R. Sankar, G. N. Rao, I. P. Muthuselvam, T.-R. Chang, H. Jeng, G. S. Murugan, W.-L. Lee, and F. Chou, Anisotropic superconducting property studies of single crystal PbTaSe2, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 29, 095601 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    J. M. Ziman, Electrons and Phonons (Oxford University Press, 2001)

    2001

  25. [33]

    Long, L.-X

    Y.-J. Long, L.-X. Zhao, P.-P. Wang, H.-X. Yang, J.-Q. Li , H. Zi, Z.-A. Ren, C. Ren, and G.-F. Chen, Single crystal growth and physical property characterization of non- centrosymmetric superconductor PbTaSe2, Chin. Phys. Lett. 33, 037401 (2016)

    2016

  26. [34]

    Baeva, A

    E. Baeva, A. Kolbatova, N. Titova, S. Saha, A. Boltas- seva, S. Bogdanov, V. M. Shalaev, A. Semenov, G. N. Goltsman, and V. Khrapai, Natural width of the superconducting transition in epitaxial TiN films, Superconductor Science and Technology 37, 105017 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Y. Sun, S. Kittaka, T. Sakakibara, K. Machida, R. Sankar, X. Xu, N. Zhou, X. Xing, Z. Shi, S. Pyon, et al. , Fully gapped superconductivity without sign re- versal in the topological superconductor PbTaSe2, Phys. Rev. B 102, 024517 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Bouquet, Y

    F. Bouquet, Y. Wang, R. Fisher, D. Hinks, J. Jorgensen, A. Junod, and N. Phillips, Phenomenological two-gap model for the specific heat of MgB2, Europhys. Lett. 56, 856 (2001)

    2001

  29. [37]

    Carrington and F

    A. Carrington and F. Manzano, Magnetic penetration depth of MgB2, Physica C 385, 205 (2003)

    2003

  30. [38]

    Khasanov, A

    R. Khasanov, A. Shengelaya, A. Maisuradze, D. Di Cas- tro, I. Savić, S. Weyeneth, M. Park, D. Jang, S.- I. Lee, and H. Keller, Nodeless superconductivity in the infinite-layer electron-doped cuprate superconductor Sr0.9La0.1CuO2, Phys. Rev. B 77, 184512 (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    W. L. McMillan, Transition Temperature of Strong- Coupled Superconductors, Phys. Rev. 167, 331 (1968)

    1968

  32. [40]

    Bouvier, P

    M. Bouvier, P. Lethuillier, and D. Schmitt, Specific heat in some gadolinium compounds. I. Experimental, Phys. Rev. B 43, 13137 (1991)

    1991

  33. [41]

    Henheik, E

    J. Henheik, E. Langmann, and A. B. Lauritsen, Multi- band superconductors have enhanced critical tempera- tures, arXiv:2409.17297

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    J. Yu, C. J. Ciccarino, R. Bianco, I. Errea, P. Narang, and B. A. Bernevig, Non-trivial quantum geometry and the strength of electron–phonon coupling, Nat. Phys. 20, 1262 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16047123

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.