Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

Operator Valued Flow Equation Approach to the Bosonic Lattice Polaron: Dispersion Renormalization Beyond the Fr\"ohlich Paradigm

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that, beyond the single-phonon Fröhlich picture, two-phonon scattering processes significantly renormalize the lattice polaron dispersion and can produce a bound state absent from Fröhlich-type models.

desk verdict New operator-valued flow-equation method, credible subsonic dispersions, but the headline bound-state claim rests on uncontrolled truncation in the regime the authors themselves flag as unreliable. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19947 v2 pith:2NHXEGDH submitted 2024-11-29 cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph

Jan-Philipp Christ , Pit Bermes , Fabian Grusdt This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph PACS 67.85.-d71.38.-k
keywords Bosepolaronopticallatticeflowequationtwo-phononscatteringdispersionboundstateBogoliubov–FröhlichHamiltonianmean-fieldtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a single impurity trapped in a one-dimensional optical lattice and dressed by phonons of a surrounding Bose–Einstein condensate, asking whether the standard single-phonon (Fröhlich) description of the lattice polaron is enough. The authors extend the flow-equation renormalization method to Hamiltonians whose coefficients are themselves operators, and use it to compute the polaron's renormalized dispersion when two-phonon scattering terms are included. They claim that two-phonon processes significantly change the shape of the dispersion in certain coupling regimes and can produce a bound state below the single-phonon continuum, something a Fröhlich-type model cannot have. If true, low-energy spectra and effective masses of lattice polarons in those regimes must be calculated beyond the Fröhlich paradigm.

What carries the argument

The central object is the operator-valued flow equation approach: the Hamiltonian is diagonalized by a continuous unitary flow with the canonical generator $\hat{\eta} = [\hat{H}_0, \hat{H}_{\mathrm{int}}]$, and because a nonzero hopping makes the diagonal part depend on the total boson momentum $\hat{P}$, all flow coefficients (the phonon energy $\omega_k$, the couplings $U_k$, $V_{k,k'}$, $W_{k,k'}$, and the diagonal parts) are promoted to operators that commute with the phonon number operators $\hat{n}_k$. The flow is truncated at quadratic order in phonon operators, normal-ordered with respect to the bosonic vacuum, and the flowing operators are represented either by a truncated Fourier series in $aq - a\hat{P}$ with cutoff $N = 6$ or by a heuristic basis whose Fourier spectrum decays exponentially. A Lee–Low–Pines transformation first factorizes the lattice problem into momentum blocks, which is what makes the polaron-frame dispersion the natural output.

What would settle it

A numerical solution that keeps three- and four-phonon terms and does not truncate the operator basis, for instance exact diagonalization of the extended lattice Bogoliubov–Fröhlich Hamiltonian on a finite lattice at the paper's parameters, checking whether a single-phonon mode appears below the phonon vacuum for couplings just below $g_{\mathrm{eff}} \approx -2.55$ with $J > 0$; if no such mode appears, the bound-state prediction is an artifact of the truncation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within Bogoliubov theory including two-phonon terms, the paper claims that the pronounced narrowing of the polaron dispersion at the Brillouin-zone edge, previously found at large repulsive couplings in Fröhlich-only treatments, does not survive once two-phonon scattering is included; instead, such renormalization appears on the attractive side of the Feshbach resonance. The flow-equation calculations additionally predict, for a mobile impurity with nonzero hopping, a bosonic excitation with negative single-particle energy relative to the phonon vacuum, indicating a polaronic bound state that single-phonon Fröhlich models cannot produce. The flow results effectively confirm the mean-field variational dispersions and ground-state energies wherever the flow parameters do not diverge, and the two approaches agree that the repulsive and attractive polaron branches connect asymptotically as the impurity–boson coupling tends to infinity.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the quadratic truncation in phonon operators plus a finite Fourier or heuristic representation of the flowing operators is accurate enough that neglected higher-order terms and basis tails do not change the dispersion or create the bound state spuriously.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Fröhlich-only treatments are not sufficient to capture the low-energy spectrum of lattice polarons in the studied coupling regimes; two-phonon terms must be included.
  • The strong dispersion narrowing at the Brillouin-zone edge previously predicted at large repulsive couplings is not the final story: with two-phonon terms it appears on the attractive side instead.
  • A polaronic bound state below the single-phonon continuum can appear even for a mobile impurity with $J > 0$, observable as a negative single-particle excitation energy.
  • The flow-equation approach confirms the mean-field dispersion and ground-state energy wherever the flow parameters do not diverge, providing a useful cross-check across two independent approximation schemes.
  • The breakdown of the flow equations near the repulsive–attractive transition coincides with the divergence of the parameter representation, signaling a regime where finite representations of the flowing operators are inadequate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the predicted bound-state onset just below the critical attractive coupling gives a sharp experimental target: spectroscopic measurements of single-phonon excitations should show a mode dropping below the phonon vacuum energy as the impurity–boson interaction crosses that region.
  • Editorial extension: the finding that two-phonon terms counteract the repulsive-side dispersion narrowing implies that the hopping (effective mass) renormalization is non-monotonic in the impurity–boson coupling, which could be probed by measurements of hopping renormalization across the Feshbach resonance.
  • Editorial extension: the method's breakdown near the repulsive–attractive transition, tied to diverging parameters, suggests the transition is a genuine nonperturbative effect rather than a weak-coupling artifact; non-Gaussian variational states or exact numerics retaining higher-order phonon terms could test the location and nature of the transition.
  • Editorial extension: the Fourier-series representation of flowing operators should transfer to arbitrary periodic lattice potentials within the tight-binding approximation, while for a free impurity with quadratic dispersion a polynomial ansatz would be the natural analogue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies a single impurity confined to a one-dimensional optical lattice and immersed in a homogeneous one-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensate. The authors derive an extended lattice Bogoliubov-Fröhlich Hamiltonian that includes two-phonon scattering terms, and they compute the polaron ground-state energy and dispersion using two independent methods: a variational coherent-state (mean-field) approach and an operator-valued extension of Wegner's flow-equation approach. In the flow-equation method, the flowing Hamiltonian is truncated at quadratic order in phonon operators and the flow coefficients, which are operators diagonal in phonon occupation numbers, are represented either by a truncated Fourier series (cutoff N=6) or by a heuristic basis. The authors benchmark the J=0 case against exact diagonalization and compare the Fröhlich-level results with mean-field theory. They report that two-phonon scattering significantly changes the dispersion shape in certain interaction regimes and that the flow equations predict a polaronic bound state below the single-phonon continuum for J>0, which they claim is absent in Fröhlich-type models.

Significance. If the central claims are correct, the paper would show that Fröhlich-only treatments are insufficient for lattice Bose polarons beyond weak coupling, and it would provide a new operator-valued flow-equation formalism applicable to bosonic impurity problems. The manuscript is commendably explicit about the approximations made and about regimes where the flow equations break down; it also provides a useful exact-diagonalization benchmark at J=0 and clearly identifies the subsonic regime where flow equations and mean-field theory agree. The main physical prediction, however, the J>0 bound state, is not independently verified and appears in a parameter regime that the authors themselves describe as unreliable for their method. The significance of the paper therefore depends on whether that prediction can be supported by a controlled benchmark or by a substantially weakened formulation of the claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III B 2, Fig. 7] The central claim of a polaronic bound state for J>0 rests solely on the truncated flow equations in a regime that the authors identify as unreliable. Section IV E states that at the repulsive-attractive transition the deformation parameter diverges and 'a finite representation of the expansion operators can no longer be justified,' and Section V states that 'in the transition region ... the flow equations do not give physical results.' The J>0 data in Fig. 7 are shown at negative geff near and inside the gray-shaded instability region, and no independent benchmark (e.g., exact diagonalization, DMRG, or a controlled resummation) is provided for J>0. Because the abstract's bound-state prediction is carried by this figure, the claim needs either an independent J>0 benchmark or an explicit reframing as a tentative, method-dependent signal.
  2. [§IV B, §IV A] The quadratic truncation and vacuum normal ordering are uncontrolled precisely in the attractive strong-coupling regime where the bound state appears. The flow Hamiltonian is truncated to at most two phonon operators and normal-ordered with respect to the vacuum, with the justification that 'in the subsonic regime of the lattice polaron it can be assumed that the bosonic vacuum is indeed the ground state of the system.' For a strongly attractive polaron with a substantial phonon cloud, this assumption is not obviously valid, and higher-order phonon terms generated during the flow were shown in Section III A to become more important for larger interaction strengths. The authors do not quantify the error from neglecting three- and higher-phonon terms in the bound-state region, so the negative single-phonon energy in Fig. 7 could be an artifact of the truncation.
  3. [§IV C 1, §IV C 2] The representation of the operator-valued coefficients is not systematically controlled, and no convergence study in the cutoff is presented. The Fourier cutoff N=6 is used throughout, while the heuristic basis (37) is explicitly designed to enforce the condition alpha_{n+1}<alpha_n that was observed to yield agreement with mean-field theory. This makes the heuristic ansatz an assumption about the physics rather than a systematically improvable truncation, and the authors note that this ansatz also breaks down (divergence to -infinity) for large interaction strengths. A convergence check in N, or a comparison between the Fourier and heuristic ansatze in the specific parameter range of Fig. 7, is needed to support the bound-state prediction.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typos and mislabeled cross-references: 'interation' and 'strenghts' appear in Section III A, 'conceputually' appears at the beginning of Section III, 'Brilloin' appears in the caption of Fig. 2, and the text refers to 'Figure 1a' and 'Figure 2a' when describing the first panels of what are labeled Figures 2 and 3.
  2. [§III B 2] It is not stated explicitly whether Figures 8 and 9 use the Fourier or the heuristic ansatz for the flow-equation results; this information is necessary for the reader to assess the reliability of those results, especially because the two ansatze behave differently in the breakdown regime.
  3. [§II, Eq. (15)] The acronym BF is introduced in Eq. (15) as the 'extended lattice Bogoliubov-Fröhlich (BF) Hamiltonian' but is not spelled out at that point; consider defining it explicitly at first use.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The central two-phonon and bound-state results are not circular, but the heuristic-ansatz comparison in Sec. IV C 2 is engineered to enforce the very FE-MF agreement condition it then reports; the J>0 bound-state claim is better characterized as an unsupported approximation than as circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV C 2 (Heuristic Ansatz), Eq. (37)-(38); cf. Section III A]
    "Based on the phenomenological observation that mean field theory and the flow equations quantitatively agree when the Fourier expansion coefficients associated with higher energies are strictly smaller than those associated with lower energies, in a second step we will choose a heuristic ansatz that enforces precisely that condition. ... their Fourier spectrum has the convenient property that higher frequency contributions are exponentially (but smoothly) suppressed, thus enforcing the phenomenological condition α(H0) n+1 < α(H0) n ∀0 < n < N, we have found in section III."

    The heuristic basis ci(x), si(x) is not derived from the flow equations; it is selected so that its Fourier spectrum decays exponentially, which by construction enforces the condition α_{n+1}<α_n. Section III A had identified exactly this condition as the signature that FE quantitatively agree with MF. The paper then uses this engineered basis to report 'a good agreement between FE and MF' for the supersonic Fröhlich dispersion (Fig. 4). Thus this particular FE-versus-MF agreement is partially an output of the ansatz choice rather than an independent confirmation. The central two-phonon results and the J>0 bound-state prediction use the Fourier ansatz (N=6), so the circularity is limited to the heuristic-ansatz validation and does not by itself determine the headline claims.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation chain is not circular: the extended Bogoliubov-Fröhlich Hamiltonian (15) is obtained from the microscopic Hamiltonian (1) via the Lee-Low-Pines transformation without fitting, the flow equations are derived from Wegner's canonical generator under an explicit quadratic truncation (Sec. IV B), and the J=0 case is benchmarked against exact diagonalization (Fig. 6). The headline two-phonon predictions, including the altered dispersion and the possible polaronic bound state, are outputs of the Fourier-ansatz flow equations rather than fits to the quantities they predict, and they are not justified by a self-citation chain. I therefore do not classify those central claims as circular. I do flag one mild circular validation: the heuristic ansatz (37)-(38) is deliberately designed to enforce the coefficient-decay condition that Section III A found to accompany FE-MF agreement, so the subsequent good agreement of the heuristic flow equations with MF is partly by construction. This is confined to the supersonic Fröhlich comparison (Figs. 4-5) and does not support the headline two-phonon or bound-state claims. Separately, the J>0 bound-state prediction in Fig. 7 has no independent benchmark and sits near the regime where the authors state that 'in the transition region between repulsive and attractive polaron, the flow equations do not give physical results' (Sec. V) and where a finite representation of the expansion operators 'can no longer be justified' (Sec. IV E). That is an evidentiary gap and an approximation-risk, not a circularity, and should be weighed as a correctness concern. Self-citations ([8], [14]-[18]) are frequent but not load-bearing: the MF comparison is a variational upper bound, and the cited prior results are used as context rather than to forbid alternatives.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The physical parameters (J, a, xi, l_ho, g_eff) are inputs taken from the experimental geometry and previous work; the load-bearing choices are the truncations (quadratic order, finite basis, finite grid). No data fitting is performed, but the heuristic ansatz is partly shaped by the mean-field comparison.

free parameters (3)
  • Fourier series cutoff N = N = 6
    Chosen for the flow-equation dispersions; no systematic convergence study is reported, so results may depend on this cutoff.
  • Heuristic basis size and parameters = i in {1,2,3,4}
    The basis functions (37) are selected so their Fourier spectrum decays exponentially, encoding an expected dispersion shape rather than being derived from first principles.
  • Momentum grid size = Ngrid = 12
    All flow and mean-field calculations use a 12-point momentum grid; grid-convergence is not documented.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Bogoliubov description of the BEC with phonon-phonon interactions neglected
    Used in Section II to obtain Hamiltonian (9); valid in the dilute or small gBB limit, but restricts strong-coupling conclusions.
  • ad hoc to paper Quadratic truncation of the flow Hamiltonian and vacuum normal ordering
    Section IV B states all generated terms beyond second order in bosonic operators are neglected; no bound on the neglected terms is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Finite Fourier or heuristic representation of operator-valued flow coefficients
    Section IV C replaces continuous operator functions by a finite set of parameters; the heuristic ansatz is designed to satisfy a condition observed in the comparison to mean field.
  • domain assumption Gaussian Wannier functions with width l_ho
    Section II uses Gaussian Wannier orbitals to compute couplings (10)-(12); this is a standard tight-binding simplification.
  • domain assumption Bosonic vacuum is the ground state in the subsonic regime
    Section IV B justifies vacuum normal ordering by assuming the subsonic polaron ground state is the phonon vacuum; this is checked only numerically and fails in supersonic regimes.
  • standard math Canonical flow generator eta = [H0, Hint]
    Standard Wegner generator choice from the flow-equation literature [31]; not specific to this paper.
invented entities (1)
  • Polaronic bound state below the single-phonon continuum for J>0
    purpose: Explains the negative single-particle excitation energies found by the flow equations in Figure 7 and supports the headline claim of a bound state absent in Fröhlich-type models.
    Predicted by the approximate flow equations for nonzero hopping; no exact-diagonalization benchmark, experimental signature, or parameter-free estimate is provided for J>0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Operator Valued Flow Equation Approach to the Bosonic Lattice Polaron: Dispersion Renormalization Beyond the Fr\"ohlich Paradigm." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2NHXEGDH

@misc{pith2026241119947,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Operator Valued Flow Equation Approach to the Bosonic Lattice Polaron: Dispersion Renormalization Beyond the Fr\"ohlich Paradigm},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2NHXEGDH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19947}
}
read the original abstract

We consider the ground state properties of a lattice Bose polaron, a quasiparticle arising from the interaction between an impurity confined to an optical lattice and a surrounding homogeneous Bose-Einstein condensate hosting phononic modes. We present an extension of Wegner's and Wilson's flow equation approach, the operator valued flow equation approach, which allows us to calculate the renormalized dispersion of the polaron and assess the role of two-phonon scattering processes on the dispersion. The results obtained in this way are compared to a variational mean-field approach. We find that in certain impurity phonon interaction regimes the shape of the dispersion is significantly altered by the inclusion of two-phonon scattering events as opposed to only single-phonon scattering events. Moreover, our results predict that a polaronic bound state may emerge, which is not present in Fr\"ohlich-type models that only consider single-phonon scattering events.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19947 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A single impurity (red) is immersed in a quasi-one di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Polaron dispersion obtained via MF (blue dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Polaron dispersion obtained via MF and the flow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Polaron dispersion obtained via MF and the flow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Ground state energy at momentum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Ground state energy as a function of the interac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Comparison of the polaron dispersion obtained via [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: In Figure 8, we observe that for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Counterflow of lattice polarons in harmonically confined optical lattices

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a trapped 1D lattice, a single repulsive impurity in a Mott-insulator bath forms a correlated counterflow state with a combined unity-filling profile and slowly decaying anti-pair correlations.

  2. Polaronic dressing of bound states

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Polaronic dressing from a Bose-Einstein condensate destroys a loosely bound dimer of two impurity atoms while a tightly bound dimer survives, with the crossover set by the ratio of dimer binding energy to polaron energy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    the impurity is localized and cannot hop between lattice sites

    Zero Hopping: Static Impurity We will start our discussion by considering the case J = 0, i.e. the impurity is localized and cannot hop between lattice sites. This case is exactly solvable using a Bogoliubov-de Gennes transformation and shall serve as a test to assess the range of applicability of the flow equations. First of all, it is notable in Figure ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    atively small interaction geff = 3.2 in Figure 1a, MF and the flow equations yield essentially identical results

    The calculations were performed on a one-dimensional momentum grid of size Ngrid = 12. atively small interaction geff = 3.2 in Figure 1a, MF and the flow equations yield essentially identical results. For larger interation shown in Figure 1b, the MF dispersion gets narrower around q = ±π/a at the edge of the BZ. The FE predict a very slight correction to ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Nonzero Hopping: Mobile Impurity on a Lattice We open our analysis by comparing the effect of in- cluding the full BF Hamiltonian on the dispersions in Figure 2. In Figure 8, we observe that for geff > 0 the two-phonon terms have the effect of counteracting the strong renormalization, which became particularly prominent around q = ±π/a at the edge of the ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    all we have is a cos aq − a ˆP - type dependence

    Fourier Series Ansatz The fact that initially the only dependence on the num- ber operators lies in the cosine of the boson momentum is a great simplification, i.e. all we have is a cos aq − a ˆP - type dependence. The flow will also create higher fre- quency terms of the form cos naq − na ˆP , n∈ N. This is because in the first integration step the terms...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Heuristic Ansatz There may be cases where the functional dependence of the operators, especially the diagonal part ˆH0, ˆHk, can- not be captured by a truncated Fourier series. Then, the truncation scheme just developed, where terms of order N ′ > N are merely ignored, need not be well-behaved, because the infinite number of terms beyond the cutoff may ha...

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    L. D. Landau, Electron Motion in Crystal Lattices, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 3, 10.1016/b978-0-08-010586-4.50015-8 (1933)

    doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-010586-4.50015-8 1933

  7. [7]

    Fr¨ ohlich, Electrons in lattice fields, Advances in Physics 3, 325 (1954), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018735400101213

    H. Fr¨ ohlich, Electrons in lattice fields, Advances in Physics 3, 325 (1954), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018735400101213

    doi:10.1080/00018735400101213 1954

  8. [8]

    J. T. Devreese, Fr¨ ohlich polarons. lecture course including detailed theoretical derivations (2015), arXiv:1012.4576 [cond-mat.other]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Sachdev, Hole motion in a quantum n´ eel state, Phys

    S. Sachdev, Hole motion in a quantum n´ eel state, Phys. Rev. B 39, 12232 (1989)

    1989

  2. [10]

    C. L. Kane, P. A. Lee, and N. Read, Motion of a single hole in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 39, 6880 (1989)

    1989

  3. [11]

    Koepsell, J

    J. Koepsell, J. Vijayan, P. Sompet, F. Grusdt, T. A. Hilker, E. Demler, G. Salomon, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Imaging magnetic polarons in the doped fermi–hubbard model, Nature 572, 358 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Tempere, W

    J. Tempere, W. Casteels, M. K. Oberthaler, S. Knoop, E. Timmermans, and J. T. Devreese, Feynman path- integral treatment of the bec-impurity polaron, Phys. Rev. B 80, 184504 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Grusdt, N

    F. Grusdt, N. Mostaan, E. Demler, and L. A. P. Ardila, Impurities and polarons in bosonic quantum gases: a re- view on recent progress (2024), arXiv:2410.09413 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Mathey, D.-W

    L. Mathey, D.-W. Wang, W. Hofstetter, M. D. Lukin, and E. Demler, Luttinger liquid of polarons in one- dimensional boson-fermion mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 120404 (2004)

    2004

  7. [15]

    Bloch, Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices, Na- ture physics 1, 23 (2005)

    I. Bloch, Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices, Na- ture physics 1, 23 (2005)

    2005

  8. [16]

    Bruderer, A

    M. Bruderer, A. Klein, S. R. Clark, and D. Jaksch, Po- laron physics in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 76, 011605 (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    L. J. LeBlanc and J. H. Thywissen, Species-specific optical lattices, Physical Review A 75, 10.1103/phys- reva.75.053612 (2007)

    2007 doi

  10. [18]

    S. P. Rath and R. Schmidt, Field-theoretical study of the bose polaron, Phys. Rev. A 88, 053632 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    Grusdt, G

    F. Grusdt, G. E. Astrakharchik, and E. Demler, Bose polarons in ultracold atoms in one dimension: beyond the fr¨ ohlich paradigm, New Journal of Physics19, 103035 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Y. E. Shchadilova, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, and E. Dem- ler, Quantum dynamics of ultracold bose polarons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 113002 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Mostaan, N

    N. Mostaan, N. Goldman, and F. Grusdt, A unified the- ory of strong coupling bose polarons: From repulsive po- larons to non-gaussian many-body bound states (2023), arXiv:2305.00835 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2023

  14. [22]

    Christianen, J

    A. Christianen, J. I. Cirac, and R. Schmidt, Phase di- agram for strong-coupling Bose polarons, SciPost Phys. 16, 067 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Grusdt, A

    F. Grusdt, A. Shashi, D. Abanin, and E. Demler, Bloch oscillations of bosonic lattice polarons, Physical Review 13 A 90, 10.1103/physreva.90.063610 (2014)

    2014 doi

  16. [24]

    Catani, G

    J. Catani, G. Lamporesi, D. Naik, M. Gring, M. Inguscio, F. Minardi, A. Kantian, and T. Giamarchi, Quantum dynamics of impurities in a one-dimensional bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 85, 023623 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    Parisi and S

    L. Parisi and S. Giorgini, Quantum monte carlo study of the bose-polaron problem in a one-dimensional gas with contact interactions, Phys. Rev. A 95, 023619 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    A. S. Dehkharghani, A. G. Volosniev, and N. T. Zinner, Quantum impurity in a one-dimensional trapped bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 92, 031601 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    A. G. Volosniev and H.-W. Hammer, Analytical approach to the bose-polaron problem in one dimension, Phys. Rev. A 96, 031601 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Jager, R

    J. Jager, R. Barnett, M. Will, and M. Fleischhauer, Strong-coupling bose polarons in one dimension: Con- densate deformation and modified bogoliubov phonons, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033142 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Brauneis, H.-W

    F. Brauneis, H.-W. Hammer, M. Lemeshko, and A. G. Volosniev, Impurities in a one-dimensional Bose gas: the flow equation approach, SciPost Phys. 11, 008 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Panochko and V

    G. Panochko and V. Pastukhov, Mean-field construction for spectrum of one-dimensional bose polaron, Annals of Physics 409, 167933 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Santiago-Garc ´ ıa, S

    M. Santiago-Garc ´ ıa, S. G. Castillo-L´ opez, and A. Camacho-Guardian, Lattice polaron in a bose–einstein condensate of hard-core bosons, New Journal of Physics 26, 063015 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    S. Ding, G. A. Dom ´ ınguez-Castro, A. Julku, A. Camacho-Guardian, and G. M. Bruun, Polarons and bipolarons in a two-dimensional square lattice, SciPost Phys. 14, 143 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Wegner, Flow-equations for hamiltonians, Annalen der Physik 506, 77 (1994)

    F. Wegner, Flow-equations for hamiltonians, Annalen der Physik 506, 77 (1994)

    1994

  26. [34]

    S. D. G lazek and K. G. Wilson, Renormalization of hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. D 48, 5863 (1993)

    1993

  27. [35]

    T. D. Lee, F. E. Low, and D. Pines, The motion of slow electrons in a polar crystal, Phys. Rev. 90, 297 (1953)

    1953

  28. [36]

    Kehrein, The Flow Equation Approach to Many- Particle Systems , Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer, 2006)

    S. Kehrein, The Flow Equation Approach to Many- Particle Systems , Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (Springer, 2006)

    2006

  29. [37]

    Kain and H

    B. Kain and H. Y. Ling, Analytical study of static beyond-fr¨ ohlich bose polarons in one dimension, Phys. Rev. A 98, 033610 (2018)

    2018

  30. [38]

    Yakaboylu, Analytical approach to the bose polaron via a q-deformed lie algebra, Phys

    E. Yakaboylu, Analytical approach to the bose polaron via a q-deformed lie algebra, Phys. Rev. A 106, 033321 (2022). Appendix A: The Flow Equations The flow equations for the diagonal part of the Hamiltonian are: ∂λ ˆH0 2 = −2 X p,p′ ˆϕ′ p,p′ ˆWp,p′(ˆnp + 1, ˆnp′ + 1) + ˆWp′,p...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.