Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 93 references

Phase-resolving spin-wave microscopy using infrared strobe light

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Using a 1550-nm modulated laser, the paper demonstrates direct phase-resolved spin-wave imaging without an optical reference path, extracting wavevectors and group velocity from the same scans.

desk verdict A credible 1550 nm strobe-light setup produces phase-resolved spin-wave maps without a reference path; the unmeasured instrumental-phase uniformity claim and a circular group-velocity extraction are the main soft spots, both fixable in revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00611 v1 pith:MTN3JNYR submitted 2024-11-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yuzan Xiong , Andrew Christy , Muntasir Mahdi , Rui Sun , Yi Li , Robert D. Geil , James F. Cahoon , Frank Tsui
show 7 more authors
Binbin Yang Tae Hee Kim Jia-Mian Hu Dali Sun Michael C. Hamilton Valentine Novosad Wei Zhang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords spin-wavemicroscopyphase-resolvedimagingstroboscopiclightmagneto-opticaldetectionbackwardvolumespinwavesyttriumirongarnet1550-nmprobemagnonphase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper demonstrates that a cw fiber laser at 1550 nm, amplitude-modulated at gigahertz frequencies, can act as a stroboscopic probe for magnetization dynamics: the lock-in amplitude and phase of the magneto-optical signal directly encode the precession amplitude and phase of the spins. Because the instrumental phase is slowly varying across the field of view, the detected phase contrast can be turned into a two-dimensional map of spin-wave wavefronts in the steady state, without any reference optical path. The same setup yields frequency-versus-field dispersion spectra from which the backward-volume spin-wave branch of YIG is identified and the group velocity is extracted, and the 2D wavefront maps provide wavevectors by spatial Fourier analysis. If correct, this gives a simple, all-fiber, phase-resolved microscope for magnons that could be used to study hybrid magnonic circuits and magnon phase as a quantum variable.

What carries the argument

The central object is the infrared strobe light probe: a continuously pumped 1550-nm fiber laser whose intensity is modulated by an electro-optical modulator driven by the same microwave source that excites the spin dynamics (homodyne), or by a phase-locked second source (heterodyne with an intermediate frequency for lock-in detection). The key identity is the lock-in signal decomposition $X \propto \delta m_z P_0 \cos(\varphi_{eo}-\varphi_m)$, $Y \propto \delta m_z P_0 \sin(\varphi_{eo}-\varphi_m)$, where $\delta m_z$ is the out-of-plane precession amplitude, $P_0$ the laser power, $\varphi_{eo}$ the instrumental phase, and $\varphi_m$ the magnetic phase of interest; the phase map $\arctan(Y/X) = \varphi_{eo}+\varphi_{rf}-\varphi_m$ then encodes the spin-wave wavefront. A second identity, $\varphi = \omega L/c + \omega d_p/v_g$, connects the detected phase to the spin-wave group velocity $v_g$, and the backward-volume spin-wave dispersion $\omega_{BV} = \gamma\sqrt{H\big(H+M_s(1-e^{-kd})/kd\big)}$ is used to compute $v_g$ from the spectra. These relations turn one scanned lock-in measurement into simultaneous dispersion spectroscopy and phase-resolved wavefront imaging.

What would settle it

Scanning the same area with microwaves off would reveal whether the residual phase gradient is flat to the claimed 0.2 rad; any larger gradient would mean the wavefront maps are dominated by optical artifacts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the phase of the lock-in-demodulated magneto-optical signal contains the magnetic phase $\varphi_m$ of the spin precession, after removing a nearly constant instrumental term $\varphi_{eo}$; therefore, scanning a focused 1550-nm beam over a sample and recording the in-phase and quadrature channels reconstructs the phase and amplitude of the spin precession at each point. In the continuous-wave regime, where a stationary spin-wave pattern builds up, this phase contrast directly traces the wavefront of the wave, with no reference beam and no interferometric detection. The paper verifies this on a 350-$\mu$m-thick YIG disc with a 50-nm Permalloy layer, imaging backward volume spin waves in the dipolar regime, extracting wavevectors by 2D FFT, matching the phase evolution to the BWVSW dispersion for group velocity, and resolving per-element phase differences in patterned microdots and phase-dependent collective excitations near a Py underlayer edge.

Load-bearing premise

The imaging claim assumes that the instrumental phase $\varphi_{eo}$ is essentially uniform across the scan area (stated as less than 0.2 rad), so that the observed phase contrast comes from the magnetization, not from optical path or detector variations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same fiber-optic setup, with a rf splitter, can be added to almost any existing microwave transmission measurement to obtain phase-resolved spin-wave images alongside standard FMR spectra.
  • Wavevectors of spin waves can be read directly from 2D FFT of the scanned maps, giving the full wavevector distribution across an area up to millimeters, instead of only a single laser spot as in BLS.
  • Because the probe is at 1550 nm and uses magneto-optical Kerr and Faraday effects concurrently, it can resolve the relative precession phase of metallic and dielectric layers in FM/YIG bilayers, relevant for hybrid magnonic systems.
  • The phase accumulation from propagation lets one extract the group velocity of each magnon mode directly from the phase dispersion, without temporal-spectral transformations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the wavefront reconstruction requires only stationarity, the same strobe scheme could be extended to image phase-resolved phonon propagation in piezoelectric materials, where 1550-nm polarimetry has already shown sensitivity, potentially giving a unified magnon-phonon phase microscope.
  • A systematic calibration of the instrumental phase across the field of view, using a nonmagnetic reflector, would strengthen the quantitative reading of absolute phase and allow phase-sensitive comparisons between different devices.
  • If matured, the technique could map phase shifts at magnonic device boundaries under continuous-wave excitation, providing boundary-condition data complementary to pulsed time-resolved measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a magneto-optical approach for phase-resolved spin-wave spectroscopy and microscopy using a 1550-nm continuous-wave laser that is amplitude-modulated at gigahertz frequencies (strobe light). The authors demonstrate the technique on a Py/YIG bilayer, measuring the f–H dispersion of backward volume spin waves, and obtaining two-dimensional phase maps that they interpret as spin-wave wavefronts. They further show phase-sensitive imaging of ferromagnetic resonance in patterned Py structures and interpret collective edge effects near a Py underlayer gap. The central claims are that the strobe-light phase contrast can directly map spin-wave wavefronts without an optical reference path, and that the phase evolution in the dispersion allows direct extraction of the group velocity.

Significance. If the main claims hold, the technique offers a relatively simple, non-interferometric optical method for phase-resolved spin-wave imaging at telecom wavelengths, with potential applications in hybrid magnonics and on-chip magnonic devices. The use of telecom components and the absence of an optical reference path are attractive features. However, the paper's quantitative validation is incomplete: the group-velocity extraction is circular, the spatial uniformity of the instrumental phase is asserted rather than measured, and the comparison to theory relies on several free parameters. These weaknesses currently limit the strength of the claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Spectroscopy (Eq. (2), Fig. 5)] The group-velocity extraction is circular. The measured f–H points are converted to wavevectors using the BWVSW dispersion relation, Eq. (2), and then the group velocity is computed from the derivative of the same relation. The agreement in Fig. 5(b) is therefore by construction and does not constitute an independent measurement. The authors should extract k from the 2D FFT of the spatial wavefront maps (as in Fig. 7) to construct an independent f(k) relation and compare it with Eq. (2), or derive vg from the spatial phase gradient.
  2. [Phase resolving – FMR regime] The assertion that 'the instrumental phase φeo varies only less than 0.2 rad across our 2-D scanned area' is made without presenting a supporting measurement. Because the phase maps are the central imaging result, a spatially varying φeo could produce artifacts indistinguishable from spin-wave phase. Please provide a measured φeo(x,y) map, for example by using a non-magnetic sample or an above-saturation, off-resonance measurement, or discuss the expected contributions from sample tilt, objective aberrations, and rf path variations.
  3. [Spectroscopy (Eq. (1))] The effective path difference L is determined by assuming that the spin-wave term is negligible at low fields, but no uncertainty or independent validation is given. The subsequent comparison in Fig. 4(c) uses L = 2.0 m, dp = 0.2 mm, and Ms = 0.175 T; this amounts to a fit with several free parameters rather than a parameter-free prediction. Please provide an independent determination of L (e.g., using a reference sample with known phase response) or a sensitivity analysis showing that the conclusions are robust.
  4. [Spectroscopy (Fig. 4 and Eq. (2))] The model parameters are inconsistent: the Kittel-mode fit yields Ms ≈ 0.177 T with γ = 27 GHz/T, while Eq. (2) uses Ms = 0.175 T and γ = 28 GHz/T. The authors should adopt a single consistent set of parameters (γ and Ms) throughout the quantitative analysis.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Phase resolving – FMR regime] The phase maps in Fig. 8 and elsewhere lack a color bar with units (radians); please add appropriate scale bars and color legends.
  2. [Imaging - Wavevector] The caustic angle range (112.4°–122.1°) is stated without an uncertainty estimate or a direct citation for the expected values; please provide both.
  3. [Experimental setup (Fig. 1(d))] The labels 'heterodyne' and 'homodyne' appear inconsistent with the definitions in the text; please check and clarify.
  4. [General] The manuscript contains typographical errors and irregular spacing (e.g., 'andimaged' in the abstract); a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  5. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction overstate the directness of the group-velocity extraction; unless the authors implement an independent measurement, the wording should be revised to reflect that the group velocity is inferred using the theoretical dispersion relation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity in the group-velocity 'direct extraction': the same dispersion relation is used to convert measured frequencies to wavevectors and to compute vg, so the quoted agreement is partly by construction; the central wavefront-imaging claim is not circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Results and Discussion – Spectroscopy, Eqs. (1)-(2) and Fig. 5(b); also Introduction property (4) and Summary.]
    "Using a constant-field slice of the spectra (H = 140.0 mT), the frequencies of each individual spin wave at that field can be taken and the (f, H) points can be converted to the wavevector using the dispersion relation. This allows for the calculation of the group velocity vg. ... We can calculate vg from the BWVSW dispersion relationship, with vg = ∂ωBV /∂k [62] ... ωBV = γ sqrt(H(H + Ms(1 − exp(−kd))/(kd)))."

    The wavevector k is not measured independently in this spectroscopic analysis; it is obtained by inverting Eq. (2) for each measured frequency at fixed field. The group velocity is then computed as the derivative of the same Eq. (2). Therefore the points in Fig. 5(a) lie on the theoretical curve by construction, and the 'vg calculated from the points' in Fig. 5(b) is forced to reproduce the theoretical derivative, apart from binning/rounding. The paper presents this agreement as validation of the dispersion and as evidence for the claimed 'direct extraction' of vg, but the comparison is a self-consistency check rather than an independent measurement.

full rationale

The central claim of the paper, phase-resolved spin-wave wavefront imaging by infrared strobe light, is not circular: the lock-in X and Y channels directly measure the phase combination φeo + φrf − φm, and the 2-D wavefront maps are constructed directly from spatial scans of these phase-resolved signals without an optical reference path. Wavevectors in the imaging section are extracted by 2D FFT of the spatial maps, independent of the dispersion model, so the main imaging result has independent content. The assertion that the instrumental phase φeo varies less than 0.2 rad across the scanned area is a load-bearing empirical assumption that is not shown, but an unsupported assumption is a correctness risk, not circularity. The one identifiable circular step is the group-velocity analysis in the spectroscopy section: measured frequencies are mapped to wavevectors using Eq. (2), and then vg is computed from the derivative of the same Eq. (2), making the apparent agreement in Fig. 5(b) largely by construction. This affects a supporting claim rather than the headline imaging capability, so the overall circularity is partial and localized.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurement technique introduces no new physical entities. The analysis relies on standard dispersion relations and fitted or chosen parameters (Ms, L, dp) for the quantitative extraction of wavevectors and group velocity. The key unverified premise is the spatial uniformity of the instrumental phase, which is load-bearing for the phase-resolving imaging claim.

free parameters (3)
  • Ms (saturation magnetization of YIG) = 0.177 T (fitted from Kittel mode); 0.175 T used in Eq. (2)
    The Kittel mode fit in Fig. 4 yields Ms ~ 0.177 T, and the BWVSW dispersion calculation in Eq. (2) uses Ms = 0.175 T. The extracted wavevectors and group velocities depend on this value.
  • L (effective microwave-optical path difference) = ~2.0 m
    Determined from the frequency-dependent phase evolution at low field (H ~ 40 mT) in the section before Fig. 5. This fitted parameter is used in Eq. (1) to model the phase evolution.
  • dp (effective spin-wave travel distance) = 0.2 mm
    Chosen by the authors for the theoretical phase plot in Fig. 5(c). It is not independently measured and enters the phase model in Eq. (1).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The BWVSW dispersion relation (Eq. 2) from the literature is valid for this 350 um thick YIG disc.
    The conversion of measured f-H points to wavevectors and the computation of group velocity rely on this formula. If the dispersion is modified by the Py underlayer or by boundary conditions, the extracted wavevectors and vg would be biased.
  • ad hoc to paper The instrumental phase φeo is spatially uniform across the scanned area (variation < 0.2 rad).
    Stated without a supporting measurement in the section 'Phase resolving – FMR regime'. This uniformity is essential for interpreting the phase maps as magnetic phase; if false, the wavefront images would be corrupted by optical path variations.
  • domain assumption The magneto-optical Kerr and Faraday effects respond linearly to the out-of-plane dynamic magnetization component in the measured regime.
    The lock-in signals X and Y are modeled as proportional to δmz and cos/sin of the phase. This is standard for small-angle magneto-optical detection but is assumed, not tested.
  • domain assumption The microwave field distribution near the CPW is reproduced by the HFSS simulation shown in Fig. 9.
    The interpretation of the phase maps near the dot array and the claim that the rf field is uniform in that region rely on this simulation. No experimental validation of the field profile is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phase-resolving spin-wave microscopy using infrared strobe light." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MTN3JNYR

@misc{pith2026241200611,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phase-resolving spin-wave microscopy using infrared strobe light},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MTN3JNYR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00611}
}
read the original abstract

The needs for sensitively and reliably probing magnetization dynamics have been increasing in various contexts such as studying novel hybrid magnonic systems, in which the spin dynamics strongly and coherently couple to other excitations, including microwave photons, light photons, or phonons. Recent advances in quantum magnonics also highlight the need for employing magnon phase as quantum state variables, which is to be detected and mapped out with high precision in on-chip micro- and nano-scale magnonic devices. Here, we demonstrate a facile optical technique that can directly perform concurrent spectroscopic and imaging functionalities with spatial- and phase-resolutions, using infrared strobe light operating at 1550-nm wavelength. To showcase the methodology, we spectroscopically studied the phase-resolved spin dynamics in a bilayer of Permalloy and Y3Fe5O12 (YIG), and spatially imaged the backward volume spin wave modes of YIG in the dipolar spin wave regime. Using the strobe light probe, the detected precessional phase contrast can be directly used to construct the map of the spin wave wavefront, in the continuous-wave regime of spin-wave propagation and in the stationary state, without needing any optical reference path. By selecting the applied field, frequency, and detection phase, the spin wave images can be made sensitive to the precession amplitude and phase. Our results demonstrate that infrared optical strobe light can serve as a versatile platform for magneto-optical probing of magnetization dynamics, with potential implications in investigating hybrid magnonic systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00611 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic illustration of the strobe light and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Experimental setup of the spin-wave spectroscopy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a,b,c) Illustration of the sample fabrication process. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a,b) Comparison of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) shows the calculated ωBV as a function of k at H = 140.0 mT, along with the individual points extracted from the f − H stroboscopic spectra. ωBV ex￾tends by around 1.7 GHz, which matches well with the observation in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Top panel: A 1-D field-scan amplitude trace mea [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Scanned 2-D maps of the phase-resolving spin dynam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The CPW has a signal-line width of 0.28 mm, a gap of 0.25 mm. The dielectric layer is 0.356 mm, and the permittivity is 11. Since the dot array is well below the signal line (into the bottom ground pad), the rf field is uniform across the whole regime. The spin-wave im…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) Field-scan signal traces near the Py FMR at 4-GHz simultaneously probed by a rf power diode (left) and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The scanned 2-D intensity (a-f) and wavefront (g-l) maps at selective magnetic fields, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. (a) The Py/YIG sample with a thin gap ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Quantum engineering with hybrid magnonic systems and materials,

    David D Awschalom, Chunhui Rita Du, Rui He, F Joseph Heremans, Axel Hoffmann, Justin Hou, Hidekazu Kure- bayashi, Yi Li, Luqiao Liu, Valentine Novosad, et al., “Quantum engineering with hybrid magnonic systems and materials,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engi- neering 2, 1–36 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics,

    Dany Lachance-Quirion, Yutaka Tabuchi, Arnaud Gloppe, Koji Usami, and Yasunobu Nakamura, “Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics,” Applied Physics Express 12, 070101 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    Hybrid magnonics: Physics, circuits, and applications for coher- ent information processing,

    Yi Li, Wei Zhang, Vasyl Tyberkevych, Wai-Kwong Kwok, Axel Hoffmann, and Valentine Novosad, “Hybrid magnonics: Physics, circuits, and applications for coher- ent information processing,” Journal of Applied Physics 128 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science,

    HY Yuan, Yunshan Cao, Akashdeep Kamra, Rembert A Duine, and Peng Yan, “Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science,” Physics Reports 965, 1–74 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Photon-magnon coupling: historical perspective, status, and future direc- tions,

    Biswanath Bhoi and Sang-Koog Kim, “Photon-magnon coupling: historical perspective, status, and future direc- tions,” Solid State Physics70, 1–77 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Advances in coherent coupling be- tween magnons and acoustic phonons,

    Yi Li, Chenbo Zhao, Wei Zhang, Axel Hoffmann, and Valentyn Novosad, “Advances in coherent coupling be- tween magnons and acoustic phonons,” APL Materials9 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Advances in magnetics roadmap on spin-wave comput- ing,

    Andrii V Chumak, Pavel Kabos, Mingzhong Wu, Claas Abert, Christoph Adelmann, AO Adeyeye, J Åkerman, Farkhad G Aliev, Abdelmadjid Anane, A Awad,et al., “Advances in magnetics roadmap on spin-wave comput- ing,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics58, 1–72 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    The 2024 magnonics roadmap,

    Benedetta Flebus, Dirk Grundler, Bivas Rana, Yoshichika Otani, Igor Barsukov, Anjan Barman, Gianluca Gubbiotti, Pedro Landeros, Johan Akerman, Ursula S Ebels,et al., “The 2024 magnonics roadmap,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter (2024)

    2024

Show all 93 references
  1. [9]

    Strong coupling between microwave photons and nanomagnet magnons,

    Justin T Hou and Luqiao Liu, “Strong coupling between microwave photons and nanomagnet magnons,” Physical review letters 123, 107702 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Strong coupling between magnons and microwave photons in on-chip ferromagnet- superconductorthin-filmdevices,

    Yi Li, Tomas Polakovic, Yong-Lei Wang, Jing Xu, Sergi Lendinez, Zhizhi Zhang, Junjia Ding, Trupti Khaire, Hi- lal Saglam, Ralu Divan,et al., “Strong coupling between magnons and microwave photons in on-chip ferromagnet- superconductorthin-filmdevices,” Physicalreviewletters 12...

    2019

  3. [11]

    Roadmap of spin– orbit torques,

    Qiming Shao, Peng Li, Luqiao Liu, Hyunsoo Yang, Shun- suke Fukami, Armin Razavi, Hao Wu, Kang Wang, Frank Freimuth, Yuriy Mokrousov,et al., “Roadmap of spin– orbit torques,” IEEE transactions on magnetics57, 1–39 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Yig magnonics,

    AA Serga, AV Chumak, and Burkard Hillebrands, “Yig magnonics,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics43, 264002 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Strong magnon-magnon cou- plingandlowdissipationrateinanall-magnetic-insulator heterostructure,

    Liu, JiachengandXiong, YuzanandLiang, Jingmingand Wu, Xuezhao and Liu, Chen and Cheung, Shun Kong and Ren, Zheyu and Liu, Ruizi and Christy, Andrew and Chen, Zehan and others, “Strong magnon-magnon cou- plingandlowdissipationrateinanall-magnetic-insulator heterostructure,” Phy...

    2024

  6. [14]

    Coherent spin pumping in a strongly coupled magnon-magnon hybrid system,

    Yi Li, Wei Cao, Vivek P Amin, Zhizhi Zhang, Jonathan Gibbons, Joseph Sklenar, John Pearson, Paul M Haney, Mark D Stiles, William E Bailey,et al., “Coherent spin pumping in a strongly coupled magnon-magnon hybrid system,” Physical review letters124, 117202 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Spin-torque excitation of perpendicular standing spin waves in coupled yig/co heterostructures,

    Stefan Klingler, Vivek Amin, Stephan Geprägs, Kathrin Ganzhorn, Hannes Maier-Flaig, Matthias Althammer, HansHuebl, RudolfGross, RobertDMcMichael, MarkD Stiles, et al., “Spin-torque excitation of perpendicular standing spin waves in coupled yig/co heterostructures,” Physical re...

    2018

  8. [16]

    Strong interlayer magnon-magnon coupling in magnetic metal-insulator hybrid nanostructures,

    Jilei Chen, Chuanpu Liu, Tao Liu, Yang Xiao, Ke Xia, Gerrit EW Bauer, Mingzhong Wu, and Haiming Yu, “Strong interlayer magnon-magnon coupling in magnetic metal-insulator hybrid nanostructures,” Physical review letters 120, 217202 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Exchange-torque-induced excitation of per- pendicular standing spin waves in nanometer-thick yig films,

    Huajun Qin, Sampo J Hämäläinen, and Sebastiaan Van Dijken, “Exchange-torque-induced excitation of per- pendicular standing spin waves in nanometer-thick yig films,” Scientific reports8, 5755 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Nanoscale magnonic fabry-pérot resonator for low-loss spin-wave manipulation,

    Huajun Qin, Rasmus B Holländer, Lukáš Flajšman, Fe- lix Hermann, Rouven Dreyer, Georg Woltersdorf, and Sebastiaan van Dijken, “Nanoscale magnonic fabry-pérot resonator for low-loss spin-wave manipulation,” Nature communications 12, 2293 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Spatialcontrolofhybridization-inducedspin-wave transmission stop band,

    Franz Vilsmeier, Christian Riedel, and Christian H Back,“Spatialcontrolofhybridization-inducedspin-wave transmission stop band,” Applied Physics Letters 124 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Magnon con- finement in an all-on-chip yig cavity resonator using hy- brid yig/py magnon barriers,

    Obed Alves Santos and Bart J van Wees, “Magnon con- finement in an all-on-chip yig cavity resonator using hy- brid yig/py magnon barriers,” Nano Letters 23, 9303– 14 9309 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Persistent magnetic coherence in mag- nets,

    T Makiuchi, T Hioki, H Shimizu, K Hoshi, M Elyasi, K Yamamoto, N Yokoi, AA Serga, B Hillebrands, GEW Bauer, et al., “Persistent magnetic coherence in mag- nets,” Nature Materials , 1–6 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Phase-resolved electrical detection of coherently coupled magnonic de- vices,

    Yi Li, Chenbo Zhao, Vivek P Amin, Zhizhi Zhang, Michael Vogel, Yuzan Xiong, Joseph Sklenar, Ralu Di- van, John Pearson, Mark D Stiles,et al., “Phase-resolved electrical detection of coherently coupled magnonic de- vices,” Applied physics letters118 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Phase detection of spin waves inyttriumirongarnetandmetalinducednonreciprocity,

    Jonathan Trossman, Jinho Lim, Wonbae Bang, John B Ketterson, and CC Tsai, “Phase detection of spin waves inyttriumirongarnetandmetalinducednonreciprocity,” Journal of Applied Physics125 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Combinatorial split-ring and spi- ral metaresonator for efficient magnon-photon coupling,

    Yuzan Xiong, Andrew Christy, Yun Dong, Andrew H. Comstock, Dali Sun, Yi Li, James F. Cahoon, Binbin Yang, and Wei Zhang, “Combinatorial split-ring and spi- ral metaresonator for efficient magnon-photon coupling,” Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 034034 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Hybrid magnonics with localized spoof surface-plasmon polaritons,

    Yuzan Xiong, Andrew Christy, Zixin Yan, Amin Pishe- hvar, Muntasir Mahdi, Junming Wu, James F Cahoon, Binbin Yang, Michael C Hamilton, Xufeng Zhang,et al., “Hybrid magnonics with localized spoof surface-plasmon polaritons,” Physical Review Applied22, 034009 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Mode-and size-dependent landau- lifshitz damping in magnetic nanostructures:<? for- mat?> evidence for nonlocal damping,

    Hans T Nembach, Justin M Shaw, Carl T Boone, and Thomas J Silva, “Mode-and size-dependent landau- lifshitz damping in magnetic nanostructures:<? for- mat?> evidence for nonlocal damping,” Physical review letters 110, 117201 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    Phase-resolved ferromagnetic resonance using a hetero- dyne detection method,

    Seungha Yoon, Jason Liu, and Robert D McMichael, “Phase-resolved ferromagnetic resonance using a hetero- dyne detection method,” Physical Review B93, 144423 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Element-specific high-bandwidth ferromagnetic reso- nance spectroscopy with a coherent extreme-ultraviolet source,

    Michael Tanksalvala, Anthony Kos, Jacob Wisser, Scott Diddams, Hans T Nembach, and Justin M Shaw, “Element-specific high-bandwidth ferromagnetic reso- nance spectroscopy with a coherent extreme-ultraviolet source,” Physical Review Applied21, 064047 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Ul- trafast optical manipulation of magnetic order,

    Andrei Kirilyuk, Alexey V Kimel, and Theo Rasing, “Ul- trafast optical manipulation of magnetic order,” Reviews of Modern Physics82, 2731–2784 (2010)

    2010

  22. [30]

    Imaging and phase-locking of non-linear spin waves,

    Rouven Dreyer, Alexander F Schäffer, Hans G Bauer, Niklas Liebing, Jamal Berakdar, and Georg Woltersdorf, “Imaging and phase-locking of non-linear spin waves,” Nature Communications 13, 4939 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Micro- focused brillouin light scattering: imaging spin waves at the nanoscale,

    Thomas Sebastian, Katrin Schultheiss, Björn Obry, Burkard Hillebrands, and Helmut Schultheiss, “Micro- focused brillouin light scattering: imaging spin waves at the nanoscale,” Frontiers in Physics3, 35 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Nonlinear multi-magnon scattering in arti- ficial spin ice,

    Sergi Lendinez, Mojtaba T Kaffash, Olle G Heinonen, Sebastian Gliga, Ezio Iacocca, and M Benjamin Jungfleisch, “Nonlinear multi-magnon scattering in arti- ficial spin ice,” Nature Communications14, 3419 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Deeply nonlinear excitation of self- normalized short spin waves,

    Qi Wang, Roman Verba, Björn Heinz, Michael Schnei- der, Ondřej Wojewoda, Krist` yna Davídková, Khrystyna Levchenko, Carsten Dubs, Norbert J Mauser, Michal Urbánek, et al., “Deeply nonlinear excitation of self- normalized short spin waves,” Science Advances 9, eadg4609 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Reconfigurable dipo- lar spin-wave coupling in a bilateral yttrium iron garnet structure,

    Grachev, AA and Sheshukova, SE and Kostylev, MP and Nikitov, SA and Sadovnikov, AV, “Reconfigurable dipo- lar spin-wave coupling in a bilateral yttrium iron garnet structure,” Physical Review Applied19, 054089 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Strain-tuned spin-wave interference inmicro-andnanoscalemagnonicinterferometers,

    Grachev, Andrey A and Sadovnikov, Alexandr V and Nikitov, Sergey A, “Strain-tuned spin-wave interference inmicro-andnanoscalemagnonicinterferometers,” Nano- materials 12, 1520 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Reconfigurable 3D magnonic crystal: Tunable and localized spin-wave exci- tations in CoFeB meander-shaped film,

    Sadovnikov, AV and Talmelli, G and Gubbiotti, G and Beginin, EN and Sheshukova, S and Nikitov, SA and Adelmann, C and Ciubotaru, F, “Reconfigurable 3D magnonic crystal: Tunable and localized spin-wave exci- tations in CoFeB meander-shaped film,” Journal of Mag- netism and Magn...

    2022

  29. [37]

    Long- range spin wave mediated control of defect qubits in nan- odiamonds,

    Paolo Andrich, Charles F de las Casas, Xiaoying Liu, Hope L Bretscher, Jonson R Berman, F Joseph Here- mans, Paul F Nealey, and David D Awschalom, “Long- range spin wave mediated control of defect qubits in nan- odiamonds,” npj Quantum Information3, 28 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Sensing spin wave excitations by spin defects in few-layer-thick hexagonalboronnitride,

    Jingcheng Zhou, Hanyi Lu, Di Chen, Mengqi Huang, Gerald Q Yan, Faris Al-Matouq, Jiu Chang, Dziga Djugba, Zhigang Jiang, Hailong Wang,et al., “Sensing spin wave excitations by spin defects in few-layer-thick hexagonalboronnitride,” ScienceAdvances 10, eadk8495 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Mag- netic resonance imaging of spin-wave transport and in- terference in a magnetic insulator,

    Iacopo Bertelli, Joris J Carmiggelt, Tao Yu, Brecht G Si- mon, Coosje C Pothoven, Gerrit EW Bauer, Yaroslav M Blanter, Jan Aarts, and Toeno Van Der Sar, “Mag- netic resonance imaging of spin-wave transport and in- terference in a magnetic insulator,” Science advances6, eabd3556 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Frequency comb enhanced brillouin microscopy,

    Ademir Aleman, Shreyas Muralidhar, Ahmad A Awad, Johan Åkerman, and Dag Hanstorp, “Frequency comb enhanced brillouin microscopy,” Optics Express 28, 29540–29552 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Brillouin light scattering of spin waves inaccessible with free-space light,

    Ryan Freeman, Robert Lemasters, Tomi Kalejaiye, Feng Wang, Guanxiong Chen, Jinjun Ding, Mingzhong Wu, Vladislav E Demidov, Sergej O Demokritov, Hayk Haru- tyunyan, et al., “Brillouin light scattering of spin waves inaccessible with free-space light,” Physical Review Re- search...

    2020

  34. [42]

    Correlation-enhanced interaction of a bose-einstein con- densate with parametric magnon pairs and virtual magnons,

    Victor S L’vov, Anna Pomyalov, Dmytro A Bozhko, Burkard Hillebrands, and Alexander A Serga, “Correlation-enhanced interaction of a bose-einstein con- densate with parametric magnon pairs and virtual magnons,” Physical Review Letters131, 156705 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Phase-resolved optical characterization of nanoscale spin waves,

    Ondřej Wojewoda, Martin Hrtoň, Meena Dhankhar, Jakub Krčma, Krist` yna Davídková, Jan Klíma, Jakub Holobrádek, Filip Ligmajer, Tomáš Šikola, and Michal Urbánek, “Phase-resolved optical characterization of nanoscale spin waves,” Applied Physics Letters 122 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Phase-resolved spin-wave tomography,

    Yusuke Hashimoto, Tom H Johansen, and Eiji Saitoh, “Phase-resolved spin-wave tomography,” Applied Physics Letters 112 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Phase-sensitive brillouin light scattering spectroscopy from spin-wave packets,

    AA Serga, T Schneider, B Hillebrands, SO Demokri- tov, and MP Kostylev, “Phase-sensitive brillouin light scattering spectroscopy from spin-wave packets,” Applied Physics Letters 89 (2006)

    2006

  38. [46]

    L Fallarino, Marco Madami, G Duerr, D Grundler, Gi- anluca Gubbiotti, Silvia Tacchi, and Giovanni Carlotti, “Propagation of spin waves excited in a permalloy film by a finite-ground coplanar waveguide: A combined phase- sensitive micro-focused brillouin light scattering and mi...

    2013

  39. [47]

    Experi- mentalparameters, combineddynamics, andnonlinearity of a magnonic-opto-electronic oscillator (moeo),

    Yuzan Xiong, Zhizhi Zhang, Yi Li, Mouhamad Ham- mami, Joseph Sklenar, Laith Alahmed, Peng Li, Thomas 15 Sebastian, Hongwei Qu, Axel Hoffmann,et al., “Experi- mentalparameters, combineddynamics, andnonlinearity of a magnonic-opto-electronic oscillator (moeo),” Review of Scienti...

    2020

  40. [48]

    Magnon-photoncou- pling in an opto-electro-magnonic oscillator,

    Yuzan Xiong, Jayakrishnan MP Nair, Andrew Christy, James F Cahoon, Amin Pishehvar, Xufeng Zhang, BenedettaFlebus, andWeiZhang,“Magnon-photoncou- pling in an opto-electro-magnonic oscillator,” npj Spin- tronics 2, 9 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Optical and magneto-optical behavior of cerium yttrium iron garnet thin films at wavelengths of 200–1770 nm,

    Mehmet C Onbasli, Lukáš Beran, Martin Zahradník, Miroslav Kučera, Roman Antoš, Jan Mistrík, Gerald F Dionne, Martin Veis, and Caroline A Ross, “Optical and magneto-optical behavior of cerium yttrium iron garnet thin films at wavelengths of 200–1770 nm,” Scientific re- ports 6,...

    2016

  42. [50]

    Magneto-optical bi: Yig films with high figure of merit for nonreciprocal pho- tonics,

    TakianFakhrul, StanaTazlaru, LukášBeran, YanZhang, Martin Veis, and Caroline A Ross, “Magneto-optical bi: Yig films with high figure of merit for nonreciprocal pho- tonics,” Advanced Optical Materials7, 1900056 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Surface magneto- opticsinyttriumirongarnets,

    Sushree S Dash and Miguel Levy, “Surface magneto- opticsinyttriumirongarnets,” OpticalMaterialsExpress 13, 1663–1676 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Band structure reconfiguration and surface faraday ro- tation in bi-substituted iron garnets,

    Sushree S Dash, Gregory Odegard, and Miguel Levy, “Band structure reconfiguration and surface faraday ro- tation in bi-substituted iron garnets,” Optical Materials Express 14, 715–724 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Tunable magnetically induced transparency spectra in magnon- magnon coupled y 3 fe 5 o 12/permalloy bilayers,

    Yuzan Xiong, Jerad Inman, Zhengyi Li, Kaile Xie, Rao Bidthanapally, Joseph Sklenar, Peng Li, Steven Louis, Vasyl Tyberkevych, Hongwei Qu,et al., “Tunable magnetically induced transparency spectra in magnon- magnon coupled y 3 fe 5 o 12/permalloy bilayers,” Phys- ical Review Ap...

    2022

  46. [54]

    Probing magnon–magnon coupling in exchange coupled y 3 fe 5 o 12/permalloy bilayers with magneto- optical effects,

    Yuzan Xiong, Yi Li, Mouhamad Hammami, Rao Bidthanapally, Joseph Sklenar, Xufeng Zhang, Hongwei Qu, Gopalan Srinivasan, John Pearson, Axel Hoffmann, et al., “Probing magnon–magnon coupling in exchange coupled y 3 fe 5 o 12/permalloy bilayers with magneto- optical effects,” Scie...

    2020

  47. [55]

    Detect- ing phase-resolved magnetization dynamics by magneto- optic effects at 1550 nm wavelength,

    Yuzan Xiong, Yi Li, Rao Bidthanapally, Joseph Sklenar, MouhamadHammami, SawyerHall, XufengZhang, Peng Li, John E Pearson, Thomas Sebastian,et al., “Detect- ing phase-resolved magnetization dynamics by magneto- optic effects at 1550 nm wavelength,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetic...

    2020

  48. [56]

    Hy- brid magnonics for short-wavelength spin waves facili- tated by a magnetic heterostructure,

    Jerad Inman, Yuzan Xiong, Rao Bidthanapally, Steven Louis, Vasyl Tyberkevych, Hongwei Qu, Joseph Sklenar, Valentine Novosad, Yi Li, Xufeng Zhang, et al., “Hy- brid magnonics for short-wavelength spin waves facili- tated by a magnetic heterostructure,” Physical Review Applied 1...

    2022

  49. [57]

    Surface magnetostatic modes and surface spin waves,

    JR Eshbach and RW Damon, “Surface magnetostatic modes and surface spin waves,” Physical Review 118, 1208 (1960)

    1960

  50. [58]

    Backward volume vs damon–eshbach: A traveling spin wave spec- troscopy comparison,

    UK Bhaskar, Giacomo Talmelli, Florin Ciubotaru, Christoph Adelmann, and Thibaut Devolder, “Backward volume vs damon–eshbach: A traveling spin wave spec- troscopy comparison,” Journal of Applied Physics 127 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    Si- multaneous optical and electrical spin-torque magnetom- etry with phase-sensitive detection of spin precession,

    Yi Li, Hilal Saglam, Zhizhi Zhang, Rao Bidthanapally, Yuzan Xiong, John E Pearson, Valentine Novosad, Hong- wei Qu, Gopalan Srinivasan, Axel Hoffmann,et al., “Si- multaneous optical and electrical spin-torque magnetom- etry with phase-sensitive detection of spin precession,” P...

    2019

  52. [60]

    Imaging of caustic-like spin wave beams using optical heterodyne de- tection,

    Yoichi Shiota, Shinsaku Funada, Ryusuke Hisatomi, Takahiro Moriyama, and Teruo Ono, “Imaging of caustic-like spin wave beams using optical heterodyne de- tection,” Applied Physics Letters116 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    Inhomogeneous magnetic properties characterized by simultaneous elec- trical and optical detection of spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance,

    Yoichi Shiota, Ryusuke Hisatomi, Takahiro Moriyama, AlexanderSSamardak, andTeruoOno,“Inhomogeneous magnetic properties characterized by simultaneous elec- trical and optical detection of spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance,” Applied Physics Letters119 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    Yig magnonics,

    A. A. Serga, A. V. Chumak, and B. Hillebrands, “Yig magnonics,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.43, 264002 (2010)

    2010

  55. [63]

    Non- diffractive subwavelength wave beams in a medium with externally controlled anisotropy,

    Thomas Schneider, AA Serga, AV Chumak, CW Sandweg, S Trudel, S Wolff, MP Kostylev, VS Tiberkevich, AN Slavin, and B Hillebrands, “Non- diffractive subwavelength wave beams in a medium with externally controlled anisotropy,” Physical review letters 104, 197203 (2010)

    2010

  56. [64]

    Nonlinear emission of spin-wave caustics from an edge mode of a microstructured co 2 mn 0.6 fe 0.4 si waveguide,

    T Sebastian, T Brächer, P Pirro, AA Serga, B Hille- brands, T Kubota, H Naganuma, M Oogane, and Y Ando, “Nonlinear emission of spin-wave caustics from an edge mode of a microstructured co 2 mn 0.6 fe 0.4 si waveguide,” Physical review letters110, 067201 (2013)

    2013

  57. [65]

    Magnonic notch filter based on spin wave caustic beams,

    Mitchell S Swyt, Lia Compton, Arturo Reyes-Almanza, César L Ordóñez Romero, Giuseppe Pirruccio, HJ Liu, and Kristen S Buchanan, “Magnonic notch filter based on spin wave caustic beams,” Applied Physics Letters124 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Femtosecond laser pulse driven caustic spin wave beams,

    Shreyas Muralidhar, R Khymyn, AA Awad, A Alemán, D Hanstorp, and Johan Åkerman, “Femtosecond laser pulse driven caustic spin wave beams,” Physical Review Letters 126, 037204 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    Probing spin wave diffraction pat- terns of curved antennas,

    Loic Temdie, Vincent Castel, Vincent Vlaminck, Matthias Benjamin Jungfleisch, Romain Bernard, Hicham Majjad, Daniel Stoeffler, Yves Henry, and Matthieu Bailleul, “Probing spin wave diffraction pat- terns of curved antennas,” Physical Review Applied21, 014032 (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    Non- reciprocal spin-wave beam transport in a metallized t- shaped magnonic junction,

    AA Martyshkin, SE Sheshukova, FY Ogrin, EH Lock, DV Romanenko, SA Nikitov, and AV Sadovnikov, “Non- reciprocal spin-wave beam transport in a metallized t- shaped magnonic junction,” Physical Review Applied22, 014037 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Caustic spin wave beams in soft thin films: Properties and classification,

    Alexis Wartelle, Franz Vilsmeier, Takuya Taniguchi, and Christian H Back, “Caustic spin wave beams in soft thin films: Properties and classification,” Physical Review B 107, 144431 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Imaging spin-wave damping underneath metals us- ingelectronspinsindiamond,

    IacopoBertelli, Brecht GSimon, TaoYu, Jan Aarts, Ger- rit EW Bauer, Yaroslav M Blanter, and Toeno van der Sar, “Imaging spin-wave damping underneath metals us- ingelectronspinsindiamond,” AdvancedQuantumTech- nologies 4, 2100094 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    Spin-wave self-imaging: Experimen- tal and numerical demonstration of caustic and talbot- like diffraction patterns,

    Uladzislau Makartsou, Mateusz Gołębiewski, Urszula Guzowska, Alexander Stognij, Ryszard Gieniusz, and Maciej Krawczyk, “Spin-wave self-imaging: Experimen- tal and numerical demonstration of caustic and talbot- like diffraction patterns,” Applied Physics Letters 124 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Hybridization-induced spin-wave transmis- sion stop band within a 1d diffraction grating,

    C Riedel, T Taniguchi, L Körber, A Kákay, and CH Back, “Hybridization-induced spin-wave transmis- sion stop band within a 1d diffraction grating,” Advanced Physics Research 2, 2200104 (2023)

    2023

  65. [73]

    Field-tunable interactions 16 andfrustrationinunderlayer-mediatedartificialspinice,

    Susan Kempinger, Yu-Sheng Huang, Paul Lammert, Michael Vogel, Axel Hoffmann, Vincent H Crespi, Peter Schiffer, and Nitin Samarth, “Field-tunable interactions 16 andfrustrationinunderlayer-mediatedartificialspinice,” Physical review letters127, 117203 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Abrillouinlightscat- tering study of the spin-wave magnetic field dependence in a magnetic hybrid system made of an artificial spin- ice structure and a film underlayer,

    F Montoncello, MT Kaffash, H Carfagno, MF Doty, GGubbiotti, andMBJungfleisch,“Abrillouinlightscat- tering study of the spin-wave magnetic field dependence in a magnetic hybrid system made of an artificial spin- ice structure and a film underlayer,” Journal of Applied Physics 1...

    2023

  67. [75]

    Observation of spin- wave moiré edge and cavity modes in twisted magnetic lattices,

    Hanchen Wang, Marco Madami, Jilei Chen, Hao Jia, Yu Zhang, Rundong Yuan, Yizhan Wang, Wenqing He, Lutong Sheng, Yuelin Zhang,et al., “Observation of spin- wave moiré edge and cavity modes in twisted magnetic lattices,” Physical Review X13, 021016 (2023)

    2023

  68. [76]

    Dynamic coupling and spin-wave dis- persions in a magnetic hybrid system made of an artificial spin-ice structure and an extended nife underlayer,

    R Negrello, F Montoncello, MT Kaffash, MB Jungfleisch, and G Gubbiotti, “Dynamic coupling and spin-wave dis- persions in a magnetic hybrid system made of an artificial spin-ice structure and an extended nife underlayer,” APL Materials 10 (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    Ultrastrong magnon-magnon coupling and chiral spin-texture control in a dipolar 3d multilayered artificial spin-vortex ice,

    Troy Dion, Kilian D Stenning, Alex Vanstone, Holly H Holder, Rawnak Sultana, Ghanem Alatteili, Victoria Martinez, Mojtaba Taghipour Kaffash, Takashi Kimura, Rupert F Oulton, et al., “Ultrastrong magnon-magnon coupling and chiral spin-texture control in a dipolar 3d multilayere...

    2024

  70. [78]

    Controlled interconversion of quantized spin wave modes via local magnetic fields,

    Zhizhi Zhang, Michael Vogel, José Holanda, Junjia Ding, M Benjamin Jungfleisch, Yi Li, John E Pearson, Ralu Divan, Wei Zhang, Axel Hoffmann, et al., “Controlled interconversion of quantized spin wave modes via local magnetic fields,” Physical Review B100, 014429 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    Information process- ing in patterned magnetic nanostructures with edge spin waves,

    Antonio Lara, Javier Robledo Moreno, Konstantin Y Guslienko, and Farkhad G Aliev, “Information process- ing in patterned magnetic nanostructures with edge spin waves,” Scientific reports7, 5597 (2017)

    2017

  72. [80]

    Edge spin wave trans- mission through a vertex domain wall in triangular dots,

    Diego Caso and Farkhad G Aliev, “Edge spin wave trans- mission through a vertex domain wall in triangular dots,” SN Applied Sciences4, 188 (2022)

    2022

  73. [81]

    Exceptional-point phase transition in coupled magnonic waveguides,

    Sadovnikov, Alexander V and Zyablovsky, Alexander A and Dorofeenko, Alexander V and Nikitov, Sergey A, “Exceptional-point phase transition in coupled magnonic waveguides,” PhysicalReviewApplied 18,024073(2022)

    2022

  74. [82]

    Emergent coherent modes in nonlinear magnonic waveguides detected at ultrahigh fre- quency resolution,

    An, Kyongmo and Xu, Mingran and Mucchietto, Andrea and Kim, Changsoo and Moon, K-W and Hwang, Chany- ong and Grundler, Dirk, “Emergent coherent modes in nonlinear magnonic waveguides detected at ultrahigh fre- quency resolution,” Nature Communications 15, 7302 (2024)

    2024

  75. [83]

    All-magnonic repeater based on bistability,

    Wang, Qi and Verba, Roman and Davídková, Krist` yna and Heinz, Björn and Tian, Shixian and Rao, Yiheng and Guo, Mengying and Guo, Xueyu and Dubs, Carsten and Pirro, Philipp and others, “All-magnonic repeater based on bistability,” Nature Communications15, 7577 (2024)

    2024

  76. [84]

    Nanoscale magnonic networks,

    Wang, Qi and Csaba, Gyorgy and Verba, Roman and Chumak, Andrii V and Pirro, Philipp, “Nanoscale magnonic networks,” Physical Review Applied 21, 040503 (2024)

    2024

  77. [85]

    A fiber-coupled scanning magnetometer with nitrogen-vacancy spins in a diamond nanobeam,

    Yufan Li, Fabian A Gerritsma, Samer Kurdi, Nina Co- dreanu, Simon Groblacher, Ronald Hanson, Richard Norte, and Toeno van der Sar, “A fiber-coupled scanning magnetometer with nitrogen-vacancy spins in a diamond nanobeam,” ACS photonics 10, 1859–1865 (2023)

    2023

  78. [86]

    Sagnac in- terferometry for high-sensitivity optical measurements of spin-orbit torque,

    SabaKarimeddiny, ThowMinJeraldCham, OrionSmed- ley, Daniel C Ralph, and Yunqiu Kelly Luo, “Sagnac in- terferometry for high-sensitivity optical measurements of spin-orbit torque,” Science Advances9, eadi9039 (2023)

    2023

  79. [87]

    Optical polarimetric measurement of surface acous- tic waves,

    Kotaro Taga, Ryusuke Hisatomi, Yuichi Ohnuma, Ryo Sasaki, Teruo Ono, Yasunobu Nakamura, and Koji Us- ami, “Optical polarimetric measurement of surface acous- tic waves,” Applied Physics Letters119 (2021)

    2021

  80. [88]

    Quantita- tive optical imaging method for surface acoustic waves using optical path modulation,

    Ryusuke Hisatomi, Kotaro Taga, Ryo Sasaki, Yoichi Sh- iota, Takahiro Moriyama, and Teruo Ono, “Quantita- tive optical imaging method for surface acoustic waves using optical path modulation,” Physical Review B107, 165416 (2023)

    2023

  81. [89]

    Quan- titative evaluation method for magnetoelastic coupling between surface acoustic waves and spin waves using electrical and optical measurements,

    Haruka Komiyama, Ryusuke Hisatomi, Kotaro Taga, Hiroki Matsumoto, Takahiro Moriyama, Hideki Narita, Shutaro Karube, Yoichi Shiota, and Teruo Ono, “Quan- titative evaluation method for magnetoelastic coupling between surface acoustic waves and spin waves using electrical and op...

    2024 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Nonreciprocal magnetoa- coustic waves with out-of-plane phononic angular mo- menta,

    Liyang Liao, Fa Chen, Jorge Puebla, Jun-ichiro Kishine, Kouta Kondou, Wei Luo, Degang Zhao, Yue Zhang, You Ba, and Yoshichika Otani, “Nonreciprocal magnetoa- coustic waves with out-of-plane phononic angular mo- menta,” Science Advances10, eado2504 (2024)

    2024

  83. [91]

    Gi- ant nonreciprocity of surface acoustic waves enabled by the magnetoelastic interaction,

    Piyush J Shah, Derek A Bas, Ivan Lisenkov, Alexei Matyushov, Nian X Sun, and Michael R Page, “Gi- ant nonreciprocity of surface acoustic waves enabled by the magnetoelastic interaction,” Science advances6, eabc5648 (2020)

    2020

  84. [92]

    Temperature depen- dence of the magnon-phonon interaction in hybrids of high-overtone bulk acoustic resonators with ferromag- netic thin films,

    Manuel Müller, Johannes Weber, Sebastian TB Goen- nenwein, S Viola Kusminskiy, Rudolf Gross, Matthias Althammer, and Hans Huebl, “Temperature depen- dence of the magnon-phonon interaction in hybrids of high-overtone bulk acoustic resonators with ferromag- netic thin films,” Ph...

    2024

  85. [93]

    Magnetization dynamics affected by phonon pumping,

    Richard Schlitz, Luise Siegl, Takuma Sato, Weichao Yu, Gerrit EW Bauer, Hans Huebl, and Sebastian TB Goen- nenwein, “Magnetization dynamics affected by phonon pumping,” Physical Review B106, 014407 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.