Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Effective Strings in QED$_3$

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In 2+1-dimensional massive QED, the confining string has a constant width of order $1/m$ unless it is exponentially long, and its one-loop ground-state energy and Nambu-Goldstone scattering amplitudes deviate from standard effective…

desk verdict Solid paper that resolves a known lattice puzzle and makes concrete predictions; the IR divergence in one cross section is a real caveat but does not undermine the central claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01313 v2 pith:UWDYHKZA submitted 2024-12-02 hep-th hep-lat

Ofer Aharony , Netanel Barel , Tal Sheaffer This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-lat
keywords QEDin2+1dimensionseffectivestringtheoryconfinementfluxtubewidthsine-GordonsolitonNambu-Goldstonebosonsgroundstateenergyscattering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies confining strings in 2+1-dimensional QED with a heavy electron, in the regime where the bulk mass gap $m$ is much smaller than the scale set by the string tension. It argues that in this regime the string does not behave like a standard effective string: instead of a width that grows logarithmically from quantum fluctuations, the width saturates at order $1/m$ for any string that is not exponentially long. The argument is built on the low-energy sine-Gordon description of the dual photon, where the string is a soliton whose classical electric-field profile is $\mathrm{sech}$-shaped, and the Gaussian smearing from Nambu-Goldstone fluctuations is subleading unless the string is exponentially long. The paper also computes the one-loop ground-state energy on a circle and the leading scattering amplitudes of Nambu-Goldstone bosons into bulk photons, both of which differ from standard effective string predictions at scales of order $m$. A sympathetic reader would care because these are concrete, testable deviations from universality that could be seen in lattice simulations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the sine-Gordon effective action (2.3) for the dual photon field $\phi$, whose classical soliton solution $\phi_{\mathrm{cl}} = \frac{4}{\beta}\arctan(e^{m(x-x_0)})$ is the confining flux tube. The paper's 'stringy formalism' promotes the soliton's collective coordinate $x_0$ to a dynamical $1+1$-dimensional field, the Nambu-Goldstone boson, and expands the remaining bulk fluctuations $\delta\phi_{\mathrm{bulk}}$ in pseudo-momentum space. This makes the width computation a convolution of the classical $\mathrm{sech}$ profile with the Gaussian wavefunction of $x_0$, whose ultraviolet divergence is cancelled by a scale-$M$ normal-ordering that fixes $M \sim m/2$. The same formalism, together with a 'direct formalism' expanding around the fixed soliton, carries the one-loop determinant calculation of the ground-state energy and the tree-level scattering amplitudes.

What would settle it

In a lattice simulation of 3D compact U(1) or Georgi-Glashow QED with $m^2/T$ small, measure the electric-field profile of a flux tube of length $L$ with $L$ well below $\exp(2\pi T/m^2)$: if the squared width grows logarithmically with $L$, or if the profile is Gaussian rather than $\mathrm{sech}$-like, the paper's central claim is wrong. Separately, on a cylinder of circumference $L_y$, measure the ground-state energy and check for the $\frac{1}{\pi L_y}\mathrm{Li}_2(e^{-mL_y})$ correction beyond the $-\frac{\pi}{6L_y}$ Casimir term.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Treating the confining string of massive QED$_3$ as a sine-Gordon soliton at weak coupling, the authors establish that the intrinsic width of the string is set by the inverse photon mass, $1/m$, and is independent of the string length as long as the length is not exponentially large. The measured electric-field profile is the convolution of the classical profile $E_y = \frac{e^2 m}{\pi}\,\mathrm{sech}(mx)$ with the Gaussian wavefunction of the string's transverse collective coordinate; because the classical width $1/m$ is much larger than the fluctuation width $\sqrt{\log(L_y)/T}$ when $m^2 \ll T$, the exponential $\mathrm{sech}$ profile dominates. For the ground-state energy on a circle of length $L_y$, the paper derives $E_{\mathrm{gs}} = T L_y - \frac{m^2 L_y}{4\pi} - \frac{\pi}{6L_y} + \frac{\mathrm{Li}_2(e^{-mL_y})}{\pi L_y}$ at one loop, showing the standard Casimir term plus exponentially small massive-particle corrections that become important at $L_y \sim 1/m$. It further computes the tree-level amplitudes for two Nambu-Goldstone bosons to scatter into one or two bulk photons and into two Nambu-Goldstone bosons, matching standard effective string theory in the low-energy limit while exposing new branch cuts and infrared divergences tied to string recoil.

Load-bearing premise

The constant-width conclusion rests on treating the string's measured profile as the classical soliton shape smeared by the free quantum jitter of its transverse position, while setting the overall drift of the string's zero mode aside by hand; if that separation does not represent a real open string with charges at its ends, the $1/m$ width claim could fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For non-exponentially long strings, the flux-tube width is approximately $1/m$, independent of length, and the electric-field profile is exponential rather than Gaussian.
  • The one-loop ground-state energy on a circle is $T L_y - \frac{m^2 L_y}{4\pi} - \frac{\pi}{6L_y} + \frac{\mathrm{Li}_2(e^{-mL_y})}{\pi L_y}$; at $mL_y \gg 1$ it reduces to standard effective string theory plus exponentially small terms, while at $mL_y \sim 1$ it differs.
  • Scattering of Nambu-Goldstone bosons into bulk photons opens new channels above energy $m$, with amplitudes that reduce to standard effective string theory below $m$ and satisfy the optical theorem through branch cuts.
  • For strings with length comparable to or smaller than $1/m$, the energy levels are not given by the usual effective-string formula and include $e^{-mL}$ corrections; levels above $m$ can decay into bulk particles.
  • The standard effective-string description is reliable only at energies well below $m$; between $m$ and $\sqrt{T}$, the bulk photon must be included in the effective action.
  • The computed two-NGB to one-NGB-plus-one-BP cross section contains an infrared divergence traced to string recoil, indicating that a complete treatment must include states with net transverse string momentum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the constant-width behavior is confirmed, similar weakly coupled solitonic strings in other 2+1-dimensional theories, such as massive $\phi^4$ theory, should show the same length-independent width, with additional bound-state worldsheet modes modifying the details.
  • The infrared divergences in NGB-BP scattering suggest that a resummed treatment with strings carrying net transverse momentum should produce finite cross sections; one test would be to compute the recoil-corrected two-NGB to one-NGB-plus-one-BP rate and check it against the optical-theory branch-cut expectation.
  • The crossover from an exponential $\mathrm{sech}$ profile to a Gaussian profile as $L_y$ exceeds $\exp(2\pi T/m^2)$ is a sharp, testable signature of the separation of scales $m^2 \ll T$; a lattice simulation scanning this crossover would probe the paper's core hierarchy directly.
  • Because the standard lattice U(1) action may not have the continuum limit assumed here, a meaningful quantitative test likely requires a modified lattice theory that keeps both the photon mass and the string tension finite while making $m^2/T$ small.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies effective string theory in 2+1-dimensional QED with a small bulk mass gap m compared to the square root of the string tension, using the low-energy sine-Gordon action of Polyakov. It analyzes the confining string at energies of order m, arguing that the electric-field profile is dominated by the classical sech(mx) soliton, so the string width is of order 1/m and essentially independent of the string length unless the string is exponentially long. It computes the one-loop ground-state energy of a closed string on a circle, obtaining −m^2L_y/(4π) − π/(6L_y) + Li_2(e^{−mL_y})/(π L_y), and it computes tree-level scattering amplitudes of two Nambu-Goldstone bosons into NGBs and bulk photons. The paper also identifies and discusses an infrared divergence in the 2 NGB → 1 NGB + 1 BP channel.

Significance. The paper is significant because it provides a controlled, weakly coupled example where the standard effective string theory predictions are modified by a light bulk mode, yielding concrete, falsifiable predictions for the string width and ground-state energy in a regime not previously analyzed. The two independent formalisms (direct and stringy) agree for the ground-state energy and for the finite scattering channels, and the EST result is recovered in the mL ≫ 1 limit, which serves as a useful consistency check. The paper also ships a large amount of explicit technical detail in the appendices, making the computations reproducible. If the static width and energy results hold, they are important for lattice tests of confining strings in QED3-like theories.

major comments (2)
  1. [§6.3, Appendix F, and Conclusions] The cross section for 2 NGB → 1 NGB + 1 BP is infrared divergent: the phase-space integral in Eq. (6.15) diverges as the final NGB momentum k3 → 0 because the internal BP propagator in the V3A s-channel goes on shell. The paper argues that this divergence is due to the neglect of string recoil, but the argument in Appendix F only shows that certain soft-NGB insertions from external BP legs have coefficients proportional to the total transverse momentum; it does not demonstrate that a recoil-corrected final state gives a finite cross section or that the divergence is cancelled. The Conclusions explicitly defer this to future work. Since the abstract advertises a computation of NGB scattering, this unresolved divergence is load-bearing for the scattering section and should be either resolved or the claim appropriately qualified.
  2. [§4.1 and footnote 13] The width computation freezes the zero mode of the transverse position x0 by hand, with the justification that this mimics an open string with fixed endpoints. The paper does not analyze how this choice interacts with the closed-string geometry used in the explicit computation, nor does it quantify the systematic error this introduces in the predicted crossover length between the exponential and Gaussian regimes. Since the central width claim depends on the split between the classical profile and the quantum Gaussian wavefunction, this assumption deserves a more careful discussion or a check against the open-string setup.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1.1, Eqs. (3.20)-(3.22)] The notation |0q⟩ and |pq⟩ is introduced without explicit definition; in particular, |0q⟩ could be confused with a vacuum state. Defining these as the NGB and BP momentum eigenstates extended by plane waves in the worldsheet directions would improve readability.
  2. [§6, after Eq. (6.1)] The momentum-conservation δ-functions are written with inconsistent signs: Eq. (6.1) has δ(−k1−k2+k3) while Eq. (6.4) has δ(k1+k2−k3−k4). Using a uniform convention such as 'incoming plus outgoing equals zero' would avoid confusion.
  3. [§5.1, Eq. (5.1)] The symbol δz_2^2 appears in the counterterm expression but is not defined until the renormalization conditions (5.2) are imposed. Defining it immediately before Eq. (5.1) would clarify the discussion.
  4. [Appendix G, Eq. (G.69)] There are typographical issues in intermediate expressions, such as 'dp 1' where the integration measure is missing, and a few lines where the variable p is used before being defined. These should be corrected in a final version.
  5. [§4.2, Eq. (4.14)] The normal-ordering prescription with the scale M is introduced and then argued to select M ≈ m/2, but the scheme-dependence of the split is not discussed in detail. A short comment on why the physical width is independent of this split at the order computed would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; results are derived from the sine-Gordon effective action with renormalization conditions rather than fitted to the target observables.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain starts from the sine-Gordon effective action (2.3), whose parameters m and β are set by the photon mass and the instanton expansion, with the mass fixed by the renormalization condition (5.2)-(5.4). The classical string solution (2.5)-(2.7) is the soliton of that action, so the sech electric-field profile and its 1/m width are derived consequences, not inputs. The quantum width computation in Section 4.1 convolves this classical profile with the free Gaussian wavefunction of the collective coordinate; the conclusion that the Gaussian fluctuation width is negligible uses only the stated hierarchy T_cl/m^2 ≫ 1 and is confirmed by the explicit divergence-cancellation analysis in Section 4.2 and Appendix G. The ground-state energy (5.7) is a one-loop determinant calculation with counterterms fixed by the physical mass condition; the EST Casimir term -π/(6L) emerges as a consistency check in the mL ≫ 1 limit, and the exponentially suppressed Li_2(e^{-mL}) term follows from the massive bulk-photon propagator. The scattering amplitudes are computed from explicit vertices, and agreement with the standard EST amplitude in Section 6.2 is used only as a cross-check, not as an input. The only self-citation is [2] (Aharony-Komargodski) for the standard effective-string action, and it is background rather than load-bearing: none of the new results reduce to that citation. The statement in Section 4.1 that the zero mode is 'freeze[n] by hand' is an acknowledged modeling assumption for the closed-string setup, not a circular fit. No step was found in which a predicted quantity equals, by construction, a fitted parameter or a self-cited result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computations rest on the sine-Gordon effective action, the assumed hierarchy m^2 << T, and a specific collective-coordinate split for the NGB. No parameters are fitted to data; the renormalization scale M in Section 4.2 is chosen by naturalness and does not affect the leading width prediction. No new particles or forces are postulated.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The low-energy theory of QED3 with heavy fermions and monopole-instantons is the sine-Gordon scalar action (2.3), with the periodic potential and a small coefficient m^2.
    Invoked at the start of Section 2 and used throughout; if higher harmonics or other UV details are important at the scale m, the soliton solution and its fluctuation spectrum change.
  • domain assumption The hierarchy m^2 << T (equivalently m beta^2 << 1) holds, so perturbation theory in beta is valid up to energies of order sqrt(T).
    Stated in the abstract and Section 2.1. All leading-order computations rely on this weak coupling and on the separation of scales.
  • ad hoc to paper The string position x0 can be defined by the sech-weighted average of the field, equation (3.32), and the zero mode of x0 on a circle is frozen by hand for the width computation.
    Section 3.2.1 and Section 4.1. This choice is natural but not derived from the underlying theory; the paper says the result is expected to match the open-string case.
  • domain assumption The electrons are heavy enough that the confining string is approximately stable and cannot break by pair production.
    State in the Introduction; the entire effective string description requires a stable string over the length scales considered.
  • standard math Standard perturbative QFT tools, including Feynman diagrams, LSZ reduction, dimensional regularization, and phase-shift density of states, apply in this effective theory.
    Used throughout Sections 5 and 6 and appendices; no new mathematical machinery is introduced.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective Strings in QED$_3$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UWDYHKZA

@misc{pith2026241201313,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective Strings in QED$_3$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UWDYHKZA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01313}
}
abstract

Effective string theory describes the physics of long confining strings in theories, like Yang-Mills theory, where the mass gap $M_{gap}^2$ is of the same order as the string tension $T$. In $2+1$ dimensions, there is a class of confining theories, including massive QED$_3$ as first analyzed by Polyakov, for which $M_{gap}^2\ll T$. These theories are weakly coupled at low energies of order $M_{gap}$, and may be analyzed perturbatively. In this paper, we analyze the physics of strings in such theories, focusing on QED$_3$, at energies of order $M_{gap}$ (but still well below $\sqrt{T}$). We argue that the width of the string in these theories should be of order $1/M_{gap}$ independently of its length, as long as the string is not exponentially long. We also compute at leading order in perturbation theory the ground state energy of a confining string on a circle, and the scattering of Nambu-Goldstone bosons on the string worldsheet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01313 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The electric field as a function of the distance from the string, for m = 1 and λM = 6.35·10−3 (blue). One can see the transition from Gaussian (orange) to exponential (green) profile. equation is: 0 = ∂x˜ log  sech(m(x − x˜))e −πλMx˜ 2  ⇒tanh (m (˜x − x)) = − 2πλM m x. ˜ (4.7) Hence, at large x ≳ m 2πλM , the Gaussian term on the right-hand side becomes important if one assumes as before ˜x ≈ x. Instead, the sadd… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Ground-state energy of the string (in units of the string’s length) as a function of the string’s length (in units of the BP mass), compared to the EST result. one needed for the counter-term (5.4) is convergent. In this regularization, it reads: δm2 2 = m2 2 Z ∞ −∞ dqy 2π e −s|qy| Z Λ −Λ dp 2π Z ∞ −∞ dqt 2π 1 p 2 + q 2 y + q 2 t + m2 = m2 4  1 π 2s (γ + log(2Λs)) − m 2π  . (5.11) This regularization is not usual,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Different total cross sections for scattering of two NGBs as a function of the COM energy s (in units of m2 ); to one BP, two NGBs, and two BPs, for m = 1, β = 0.5. 7 Conclusions In this paper we made first steps towards analyzing the effective action on confining strings in theories like QED3, for which the mass gap m in the bulk is much smaller than the scale set by the string tension. Above the scale m, the effec… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 1d Ising model with $1/r^{1.99}$ interaction

    hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The authors propose a weakly coupled dual field theory for the 1D long-range Ising CFT near s = 1, derive an exact spectrum at s = 1, and find matching perturbative CFT data from RG and bootstrap calculations.

  2. On the equation of state of U(1) lattice gauge theory in three dimensions

    hep-lat 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The equation of state of 3D U(1) lattice gauge theory is consistent with a single massive state below T_c and a free photon gas above T_c, with no Hagedorn tower of states.

  3. Intrinsic width of the flux tube in 2+1 dimensional Yang-Mills therories

    hep-lat 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The flux tube profile in 2+1 SU(2) Yang-Mills is governed by a single intrinsic width that equals T/(2 sigma(T)) at high temperature.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Effective String Theory Revisited,

    S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger and V. Gorbenko, “Effective String Theory Revisited,” JHEP 09, 044 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2012)044 [arXiv:1203.1054 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    The Effective Theory of Long Strings,

    O. Aharony and Z. Komargodski, “The Effective Theory of Long Strings,” JHEP 05, 118 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2013)118 [arXiv:1302.6257 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2013

  3. [3]

    Compact Gauge Fields and the Infrared Catastrophe,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Compact Gauge Fields and the Infrared Catastrophe,” Phys. Lett. B 59, 82-84 (1975) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90162-8

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(75)90162-8 1975

  4. [4]

    Quark Confinement and Topology of Gauge Groups,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Quark Confinement and Topology of Gauge Groups,” Nucl. Phys. B120, 429-458 (1977) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90086-4

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90086-4 1977

  5. [5]

    Gauge Fields and Strings,

    A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge Fields and Strings,” Contemp. Concepts Phys. 3, 1-301 (1987)

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    Phase Transitions in Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories,

    T. Banks, R. Myerson and J. B. Kogut, “Phase Transitions in Abelian Lattice Gauge Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 129, 493-510 (1977) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90129-8

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90129-8 1977

  7. [7]

    Proof of Confinement of Static Quarks in Three-Dimensional U(1) Lattice Gauge Theory for All Values of the Coupling Constant,

    M. Gopfert and G. Mack, “Proof of Confinement of Static Quarks in Three-Dimensional U(1) Lattice Gauge Theory for All Values of the Coupling Constant,” Commun. Math. Phys. 82, 545 (1981) doi:10.1007/BF01961240

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01961240 1981

  8. [8]

    Mass Gap and String Tension in QED Comparison of Theory With Monte Carlo Simulation,

    M. Karliner and G. Mack, “Mass Gap and String Tension in QED Comparison of Theory With Monte Carlo Simulation,” Nucl. Phys. B 225, 371-376 (1983) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90416-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90416-9 1983

Show all 26 references
  1. [9]

    Upper and Lower Bound for the String Tension in the Three-dimensional Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics,

    K. R. Ito, “Upper and Lower Bound for the String Tension in the Three-dimensional Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics,” Nucl. Phys. B 205, 440 (1982) [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B 215, 136 (1983)] doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90271-7

    1982 doi

  2. [10]

    The Dynamics of Domain Walls and Strings,

    R. Gregory, D. Haws and D. Garfinkle, “The Dynamics of Domain Walls and Strings,” Phys. Rev. D 42, 343-348 (1990) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.42.343

    1990 doi

  3. [11]

    Topological defects and corrections to the Nambu action,

    V. Silveira and M. D. Maia, “Topological defects and corrections to the Nambu action,” Phys. Lett. A 174, 280-284 (1993) doi:10.1016/0375-9601(93)90138-P [arXiv:gr-qc/9303017 [gr-qc]]

    1993 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Curvature corrections to dynamics of domain walls,

    B. Carter and R. Gregory, “Curvature corrections to dynamics of domain walls,” Phys. Rev. D 51, 5839-5846 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.5839 [arXiv:hep-th/9410095 [hep-th]]

    1995 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Effective Actions for Domain Wall Dynamics,

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, A. Garc ´ ıa Mart ´ ın-Caro, D. Jim´ enez-Aguilar and J. M. Queiruga, “Effective Actions for Domain Wall Dynamics,” [arXiv:2411.13521 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    Geometrically invariant interactions in capillary wave surface models,

    S. C. Lin and M. J. Lowe, “Geometrically invariant interactions in capillary wave surface models,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 16, 347-353 (1983) doi:10.1088/0305-4470/16/2/017 79

    1983 doi

  7. [15]

    Normal coordinates and curvature terms in an interface hamiltonian,

    R. K. P. Zia, “Normal coordinates and curvature terms in an interface hamiltonian,” Nucl. Phys. B 251, 676-690 (1985) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(85)80003-1

    1985 doi

  8. [16]

    A different kind of string,

    M. Caselle, M. Panero, R. Pellegrini and D. Vadacchino, “A different kind of string,” JHEP 01, 105 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2015)105 [arXiv:1406.5127 [hep-lat]]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Portraits of the Flux Tube in QED in Three-dimensions: A Monte Carlo Simulation With External Sources,

    T. Sterling and J. Greensite, “Portraits of the Flux Tube in QED in Three-dimensions: A Monte Carlo Simulation With External Sources,” Nucl. Phys. B 220, 327-350 (1983) doi:10.1016/0550- 3213(83)90045-7

    1983 doi

  10. [18]

    Effective string description of the interquark potential in the 3D U (1) lattice gauge theory,

    D. Vadacchino, M. Caselle, M. Panero and R. Pellegrini, “Effective string description of the interquark potential in the 3D U (1) lattice gauge theory,” PoS LA TTICE2014, 349 (2014) doi:10.22323/1.214.0349 [arXiv:1410.7436 [hep-lat]]

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Width of the flux tube in compact U(1) gauge theory in three dimensions,

    M. Caselle, M. Panero and D. Vadacchino, “Width of the flux tube in compact U(1) gauge theory in three dimensions,” JHEP 02, 180 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)180 [arXiv:1601.07455 [hep- lat]]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Squared width and profile of the confining flux tube in the U(1) LGT in 3D,

    M. Caselle, M. Panero and D. Vadacchino, “Squared width and profile of the confining flux tube in the U(1) LGT in 3D,” PoS Lattice2016, 347 (2017) [arXiv:1610.08315 [hep-lat]]

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    On the spectrum and string tension of U(1) lattice gauge theory in 2 + 1 dimensions,

    A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, “On the spectrum and string tension of U(1) lattice gauge theory in 2 + 1 dimensions,” JHEP 01, 063 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)063 [arXiv:1811.06280 [hep- lat]]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    How Thick Are Chromoelectric Flux Tubes?,

    M. Luscher, G. Munster and P. Weisz, “How Thick Are Chromoelectric Flux Tubes?,” Nucl. Phys. B 180, 1-12 (1981) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90151-6

    1981 doi

  15. [23]

    Solitons and Instantons. An Introduction to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory,

    R. Rajaraman, “Solitons and Instantons. An Introduction to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory,”

  16. [24]

    The Particle Spectrum in Model Field The- ories from Semiclassical Functional Integral Techniques,

    R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu, “The Particle Spectrum in Model Field The- ories from Semiclassical Functional Integral Techniques,” Phys. Rev. D 11, 3424 (1975) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.3424

    1975 doi

  17. [25]

    Nonperturbative Methods and Extended Hadron Models in Field Theory 2. Two-Dimensional Models and Extended Hadrons,

    R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu, “Nonperturbative Methods and Extended Hadron Models in Field Theory 2. Two-Dimensional Models and Extended Hadrons,” Phys. Rev. D 10, 4130-4138 (1974) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.4130

    1974 doi

  18. [26]

    An Introduction to quantum field theory,

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, “An Introduction to quantum field theory,” Addison-Wesley, 1995, ISBN 978-0-201-50397-5, 978-0-429-50355-9, 978-0-429-49417-8 doi:10.1201/9780429503559 80

    1995 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.