On the dynamics of single-vertex states in quantum-reduced loop gravity

Ilkka M\"akinen

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 37 references

On the dynamics of single-vertex states in quantum-reduced loop gravity

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The simplest states of quantum-reduced loop gravity reproduce the Bianchi I Euclidean Hamiltonian, and the analogy points to a non-vanishing curvature term in loop quantum cosmology.

desk verdict The genuinely new result is an explicit Hamiltonian action on single-vertex QRLG states, including a non-trivial Lorentzian term, but the proposed LQC modification is a clearly labelled heuristic that inherits an unresolved factor-ordering ambiguity. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01375 v2 pith:M3N2YONT submitted 2024-12-02 gr-qc

Ilkka Mäkinen This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qc

keywords quantum-reducedloopgravityquantumcosmologyHamiltonianconstraintoperatorBianchiIscalarcurvaturesingle-vertexstatespolymerizationTikhonovregularization

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum-reduced loop gravity is a simplified, graph-based form of loop quantum gravity designed to make cosmological calculations tractable. This paper constructs a Hamiltonian constraint operator—the operator that generates the theory's dynamics—for this model and works out its action on the simplest nontrivial states, a single six-valent vertex with three orthogonal edges on a three-torus. On these one-vertex states the Euclidean part of the constraint is formally identical to the Hamiltonian of Bianchi I loop quantum cosmology when the polymerization parameter is set to one and the inverse-triad factor is quantized with a Tikhonov regularization. The paper then extends this analogy to the Lorentzian part, which in standard loop quantum cosmology is taken to vanish identically because the spatial curvature of a homogeneous universe is classically zero. The result is a proposed modified loop quantum cosmology Hamiltonian in which the curvature term is a non-trivial operator that only approaches zero in the limit of vanishing polymerization; the author stresses that this proposal is heuristic and not yet systematically derived.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the reduced spin network states of quantum-reduced loop gravity: basis states on a cubical graph, with one edge along each coordinate axis per vertex, large spins $j_e \gg 1$, and maximal magnetic quantum numbers. On these states the reduced holonomy and spin operators act simply—the spin operator is diagonal and the holonomy acts like a $U(1)$ multiplication—and the reduced volume operator has the explicit eigenvalue $\Upsilon_v = \sqrt{\tfrac18 (j_x^+ + j_x^-)(j_y^+ + j_y^-)(j_z^+ + j_z^-)}$. The Euclidean Hamiltonian (3.27)–(3.28) is built from these elementary operators plus a Tikhonov-regularized inverse volume; the Lorentzian part (3.29)–(3.30) uses the scalar curvature operator of [12,13], expressed through discretized covariant derivatives of the triad. Specializing to the one-vertex state $|j_x j_y j_z\rangle$, two algebraic identities do the main work: $\hat c(e)\hat s(e) = \tfrac12 \hat s^{(1)}(e)$ and $1 - \hat c^{(1)}(e) - \tfrac12(\hat s^{(1)}(e))^2 = 2(\hat s^{(1/2)}(e))^4$, converting the Euclidean part into products of spin-1 sine operators and the Lorentzian part into fourth powers of spin-1/2 sine operators, giving Eqs. (4.8) and (4.11). The formal comparison with Bianchi I loop quantum cosmology is made at the level of these operator polynomials.

What would settle it

Evaluate the expectation value of the Lorentzian operator (3.29)–(3.30) in a coherent state peaked on homogeneous, isotropic data, following the method of [14,15]: if the result is not of the form $-48 \frac{1+\beta^2}{\beta^2} N \sqrt{p}\, \sin^4(\mu c/2)/\mu^2$ or does not vanish in the limit $\mu \to 0$, then the proposed term (4.20) is ruled out. A more direct check: compare the matrix elements of the Euclidean operator (4.8) between one-vertex states with the $\mu=1$ Bianchi I Hamiltonian; any off-diagonal mismatch breaks the analogy on which the proposal depends.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper defines a Hamiltonian constraint operator for quantum-reduced loop gravity as the sum of a Euclidean part built from holonomy loops and spin operators with a Tikhonov-regularized inverse volume (Eqs. (3.5)–(3.7)) and a Lorentzian part given by the scalar curvature operator of [12] and [13] (Eqs. (3.9) and (3.29)–(3.30)). Specializing to single-vertex states, the Euclidean constraint becomes Eq. (4.8) and the Lorentzian part Eq. (4.11), which is non-vanishing. The author observes that Eq. (4.8) is formally identical to the polymerized Bianchi I loop quantum cosmology Hamiltonian at polymerization parameter $\mu = 1$ with a Tikhonov inverse-triad quantization. Taking the analogy seriously, the paper proposes that the Lorentzian term in loop quantum cosmology need not be identically zero; instead it could be a polymerized operator of the form $C_L^{(\mu)}$ given in Eqs. (4.20) and (4.24), reducing to zero only as $\mu \to 0$. The paper is explicit that this extension is a heuristic proposal based on structural similarity, not a derivation.

Load-bearing premise

The central proposal rests on the assumption that the mathematical match between the one-vertex quantum-reduced model and Bianchi I loop quantum cosmology is a genuine correspondence, so the new Lorentzian term found in the first model can be transplanted into the second; the paper itself calls this an unproven, heuristic analogy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the analogy holds, loop quantum cosmology acquires a non-zero Lorentzian operator whose classical limit is the vanishing curvature of homogeneous space; its effects appear only where polymerization matters, near the Planck scale.
The modified Hamiltonian (4.21)/(4.24) differs from the alternative polymerized Hamiltonian of [14] in the relative sign of its quartic term, so the two proposals predict different bounce dynamics in isotropic and Bianchi I models.
The one-vertex model supplies an explicitly known Hamiltonian for quantum-reduced loop gravity on its simplest graph, opening the way to numerical studies of its spectrum and dynamics.
A coherent-state derivation of the Lorentzian term, along the lines called for in the conclusions, would convert the heuristic proposal into a derived effective Hamiltonian and fix whether the $\mu_0$-scheme or improved dynamics applies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the Lorentzian operator (4.11) is real, even a classically flat universe would carry quantum curvature fluctuations; these could appear as corrections to the Friedmann equation that grow near the bounce, potentially testable in effective loop-cosmology phenomenology.
The one-vertex/Bianchi I correspondence suggests a wider dictionary: reduced spin networks on larger cubical graphs may map onto inhomogeneous cosmological perturbations, giving a route from full loop quantum gravity to perturbation theory.
The paper leaves the polymerization parameter in Eqs. (4.20) and (4.24) unfixed; checking whether the same operator can arise from an improved-dynamics scheme would distinguish quantization ambiguities.
The Lorentzian operator depends on the graph-preserving loop assignment chosen for the Euclidean constraint; testing other loop assignments would show whether the proposed curvature term is robust or an artifact of that choice.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here is what I would tell you before reading it. The concrete new content is in Sec. 4: the Hamiltonian constraint action on single-vertex states in quantum-reduced loop gravity, including the non-trivial Lorentzian piece in Eq. (4.11). The proposed modified LQC Hamiltonian in Eqs. (4.20)-(4.24) is exactly what the author says it is: a heuristic extrapolation from a formal analogy, not a derivation. The paper is worth reading for the explicit calculation and for the honest statement of its own limitation.

What is genuinely good: the derivation in Sec. 3 is explicit and careful. The Euclidean reduction is transparent, the Lorentzian calculation is backed by SymPy code that is publicly available, and I can check it. The Euclidean part being formally identical to Bianchi I LQC is not new, but the Lorentzian action on one-vertex states is new, and the comparison with the Dapor-Liegener proposal in Sec. 4.2 is useful.

The soft spots, in proportion. The extraction of Eq. (4.11) depends on two factor-ordering choices made in Sec. 3.3 without justification. Eq. (3.29) reverses the order of Rhat_v and dV^{-1} relative to [12], and Eq. (3.30)'s "triple dots" choose an ordering. Since the reduced holonomies shift j and the reduced flux operators do not commute, reordering or symmetrizing genuinely changes the polynomial that appears in Eq. (4.9). The paper concedes the operator is not symmetric. So Eq. (4.11) is one possible operator, not the operator, and the proposed LQC Lorentzian term inherits an unquantified ambiguity. That is not fatal to the technical parts, because the author labels the LQC term heuristic, but it means the central new physical suggestion is not yet pinned down. Also, the one-vertex identification is a strong truncation: collapsing all neighboring nodes and edges to a single vertex is plausible but not demonstrated. And no dynamics are computed, so the proposal has no demonstrated physical content yet.

Who is this for? QRLG practitioners, LQC model builders, and people working with curvature operators on cubical graphs. It deserves a serious referee. I would send it to review but direct the referee to press on the ordering ambiguity and the consistency of the one-vertex reduction. The author is honest that the LQC proposal remains heuristic; the problem is that this is also the most interesting part of the paper. Final recommendation: engage with it, send it to peer review, and expect the LQC proposal to need either a systematic derivation or explicit dynamics before it can be treated as anything more than a suggestion.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a Hamiltonian constraint operator for quantum-reduced loop gravity (QRLG), first on generic cubical-graph states and then specialized to a one-vertex model on a three-torus. The Euclidean part is obtained from a modified version of existing LQG Hamiltonian operators, while the Lorentzian part uses the scalar-curvature operator of Lewandowski–Mäkinen. The author derives explicit actions on reduced spin-network basis states, using symbolic computation for the lengthy Lorentzian expression. The single-vertex result shows a formal similarity between the Euclidean part and the Bianchi I loop-quantum-cosmology (LQC) Hamiltonian; extending this analogy leads to a heuristic proposal for a non-vanishing Lorentzian term in LQC, Eqs. (4.20) and (4.24). The paper explicitly states that no systematic derivation of the LQC proposal is available.

Significance. If the QRLG derivation is sound, the paper provides a concrete, computable Hamiltonian constraint in a simplified loop-quantum-gravity setting, including a non-trivial Lorentzian (spatial-curvature) operator. A notable strength is that the Lorentzian computation is backed by publicly available SymPy code, making the lengthy algebra checkable. The proposed LQC modification is clearly speculative, and the author repeatedly and correctly flags it as heuristic (Secs. 4.2 and 5). The paper's value lies mainly in the QRLG operator action and in posing a concrete question for future work on the LQC side; the physical significance of the Lorentzian LQC term is not established here.

major comments (2)

[Sec. 3.3, Eqs. (3.29)-(3.30)] The Lorentzian operator is defined via two explicit factor-ordering choices that are not justified: the order of \hat R_v and \widehat{dV^{-1}_v} is reversed relative to [12], and the 'triple dots' in Eq. (3.30) fix an ordering in which the flux operator of the left derivative is placed to the right of the holonomy operators of the right derivative. Since the reduced flux and holonomy operators acting on the same edge do not commute (e.g., \hat p_a(v) versus \hat c^{(1)}(e) or \hat s^{(1)}(e)), different admissible orderings generically produce different polynomials in the shift operators. The paper itself concedes in Sec. 3.4 that the resulting operator is not symmetric. Consequently, Eq. (4.9) and hence the single-vertex Lorentzian action (4.11) are only one member of a family of possible quantizations, and the proposed LQC Lorentzian term (4.20)/(4.24) inherits this ambiguity. The author should either justify the chosen ordering by a concrete criterion (e.g., requiring a symmetric operator, anomaly avoidance, or a specific semiclassical limit) or explicitly examine how (4.11) changes under symmetrization/reordering.
[Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (4.2)-(4.8)] The reduction from the general Euclidean operator, Eqs. (3.27)-(3.28), to the one-vertex expression (4.3)/(4.8) is not shown in detail. The identification of all neighboring nodes and edges with the single vertex and the three loops involves several non-trivial steps: the four sign combinations (\alpha,\beta) are collapsed, the intermediate graph edges e^{\alpha\beta}_{ab} are identified with e_a or e_b, and a factor 4 is introduced in Eq. (4.2). The paper does not demonstrate that this identification is consistent with the ordering of the operators in (3.28), nor whether different choices of which neighboring edge is identified with which loop could lead to different results. Since Eq. (4.8) anchors the LQC analogy, this reduction should either be derived explicitly or stated more clearly as an additional model definition rather than a direct consequence of the general formulas.

minor comments (4)

[Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.9)] The norm expression in Eq. (2.9) is typeset with garbled vertical bars, making the inequality hard to read; please fix the formatting.
[Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.30)] The notation with triple dots inside the sum is unusual; consider defining a named ordering convention (e.g., a left-to-right ordering rule) instead of relying on the textual explanation.
[Sec. 4.2, Eq. (4.10)] It would be helpful to state explicitly that the operator identity (4.10) is verified in the accompanying SymPy code, since it is not immediately obvious from the definitions of c^(1), s^(1), and s^(1/2).
[Sec. 4.2, lines after Eq. (4.17)] The sentence discussing the Tikhonov regularization of inverse triad factors should cite the specific equation in [36] where this prescription is used, to make the claim easier to verify.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the one-vertex Hamiltonian action is derived from full loop quantum gravity operators, and the loop quantum cosmology Lorentzian proposal is explicitly labeled as heuristic rather than as a derived prediction.

full rationale

The core derivation is not circular. The Euclidean action on single-vertex states, Eq. (4.8), is obtained by applying the reduced-operator map of Eqs. (2.6)-(2.8) to the cubical-graph Hamiltonian defined in Eqs. (3.5)-(3.6), with the trace computation shown in Sec. 3.2 and the one-vertex specialization in Sec. 4.1. The Lorentzian action, Eq. (4.11), is obtained by specializing the reduced curvature operator of Eqs. (3.29)-(3.30), recalled from the prior work [13], to the one-vertex graph; the computation is explicit and does not invoke the loop quantum cosmology Hamiltonian. The formal identity between the Euclidean part and Bianchi I loop quantum cosmology at polymerization parameter mu = 1 is an observation made after the fact, not an input used to construct the operator. The proposed loop quantum cosmology Lorentzian terms, Eqs. (4.20) and (4.24), are explicitly presented as heuristic: the paper states, 'At the moment we do not have a comprehensive argument which could be regarded as a systematic derivation of the hypothesized operator,' and later says these proposals 'are, for the time being, not supported by detailed calculations.' Because no derivation is claimed, there is no reduction of a prediction to its own input. The factor-ordering choices in Eqs. (3.29)-(3.30) mean that Eq. (4.11) is one member of a family of possible quantizations, but this is a quantization ambiguity, not circularity. The self-citations [6], [7], [12], and [13] supply the prior framework and the curvature operator, but they do not define the target loop quantum cosmology result, nor are they invoked to forbid alternatives. The derivation is therefore self-contained relative to its stated assumptions, and the heuristic extrapolation is identified as such by the author.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities such as particles or forces. The free parameters are the usual polymerization parameters of loop quantum cosmology, left unspecified here, and a factor ordering choice. The main assumptions are the standard large-spin reduction of quantum-reduced loop gravity, the validity of the prior operator definitions, the specialized one-vertex identification, and the heuristic analogy to loop quantum cosmology.

free parameters (2)

Polymerization parameters mu_a in the proposed loop quantum cosmology Hamiltonian = unspecified
The paper leaves mu_a unfixed, noting that nothing rules out an improved dynamics scheme where they depend on the triad. The one-vertex model analogy suggests mu=1 for comparison with quantum-reduced loop gravity, but this is a heuristic choice, not a derivation (Sec. 4.2).
Choice of factor ordering in the Lorentzian operator = modified factor ordering
The paper adopts a reversed factor ordering between the curvature operator and the inverse volume operator compared to the original definition in [12]. This is a hand-made choice that can affect the resulting operator, and it is not uniquely fixed (Sec. 3.1).

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Leading-order large-spin truncation: for any loop quantum gravity operator acting on a reduced spin network state, the non-reduced component is negligible compared to the leading term, so the reduced operator is a valid approximation.
This is the foundation of the reduced operator construction, stated in Sec. 2.2, Eqs. (2.6)-(2.9). If it fails for the Hamiltonian constraint, the derived expressions (4.8) and (4.11) would not represent the full theory.
domain assumption The Hamiltonian constraint operator on cubical graphs, taking the Euclidean part from [9-11] and the Lorentzian part from [12,13], is an acceptable quantization of the classical Hamiltonian.
The paper relies on previously proposed operator definitions and does not derive them from first principles. The Euclidean part is modified only in the loop assignment, and the Lorentzian part is taken as given from prior work.
ad hoc to paper The one-vertex model identification: all nodes and edges in the general operator expressions are identified with the single vertex and the three loops of the one-vertex graph on the three-torus.
In Sec. 4.1 the author states this identification without showing it is a well-defined limit of the cubical graph construction. Neighboring nodes that are normally distinct are collapsed onto one node, which could affect difference operators and loop assignments.
ad hoc to paper The formal analogy between the one-vertex quantum-reduced loop gravity model and Bianchi I loop quantum cosmology is physically substantive and can be extended to the Lorentzian part.
This assumption underlies the proposed modified loop quantum cosmology Hamiltonian (4.20)-(4.24). The author explicitly labels it heuristic and notes the lack of a systematic derivation (Sec. 4.2, Sec. 5).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the dynamics of single-vertex states in quantum-reduced loop gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M3N2YONT

@misc{pith2026241201375,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the dynamics of single-vertex states in quantum-reduced loop gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M3N2YONT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01375}
}

read the original abstract

In this article we examine a Hamiltonian constraint operator governing the dynamics of simple quantum states, whose graph consists of a single six-valent vertex, in quantum-reduced loop gravity. To this end, we first derive the action of the Hamiltonian constraint on generic basis states in the Hilbert space of quantum-reduced loop gravity. Specializing to the example of the single-vertex states, we find that the Euclidean part of the Hamiltonian bears a close formal similarity to the Hamiltonian constraint of Bianchi I models in loop quantum cosmology. Extending the formal analogy to the Lorentzian part of the Hamiltonian suggests a possible modified definition of the Hamiltonian constraint for loop quantum cosmology, in which the Lorentzian part, corresponding to the scalar curvature of the spatial surfaces, is not assumed to be identically vanishing, and is represented by a non-trivial operator in the quantum theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01375 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Labeling of the edges and nodes surrounding a given node [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

[12]

Lewandowski and I

J. Lewandowski and I. Mäkinen,Scalar curvature operator for models of loop quan- tum gravity on a cubical graph, Phys. Rev. D 106, 046013 (2022), arXiv:2110 . 10667 [gr-qc]

work page 2022
[1]

E.AlesciandF.Cianfrani, A new perspective on cosmology in loop quantum gravity, EPL 104, 10001 (2013), arXiv:1210.4504 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2013
[2]

Alesci and F

E. Alesci and F. Cianfrani,Quantum-reduced loop gravity: Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 87, 083521 (2013), arXiv:1301.2245 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2013
[3]

Loop Quantum Cosmology from Loop Quantum Gravity

E. Alesci and F. Cianfrani, Loop quantum cosmology from quantum reduced loop gravity, EPL 111, 40002 (2015), arXiv:1410.4788 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[4]

Alesci and F

E. Alesci and F. Cianfrani, Quantum reduced loop gravity: Universe on a lattice, Phys. Rev. D92, 084065 (2015), arXiv:1506.07835 [gr-qc]. 24

arXiv 2015
[5]

E.AlesciandF.Cianfrani, Quantum reduced loop gravity and the foundation of loop quantum cosmology, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D25, 1642005 (2016), arXiv:1602.05475 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2016
[6]

Mäkinen, Master constraint approach to quantum-reduced loop gravity, Class

I. Mäkinen, Master constraint approach to quantum-reduced loop gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 125010 (2024), arXiv:2311.16648 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2024
[7]

Mäkinen, Operators of quantum-reduced loop gravity from the perspective of full loop quantum gravity, Phys

I. Mäkinen, Operators of quantum-reduced loop gravity from the perspective of full loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 102, 106010 (2020), arXiv:2004.00309 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2020

Show all 37 references

[8]

Alesci, F

E. Alesci, F. Cianfrani and C. Rovelli,Quantum-reduced loop-gravity: Relation with the full theory, Phys. Rev. D88, 104001 (2013), arXiv:1309.6304 [gr-qc]

2013 arXiv
[9]

Alesci, M

E. Alesci, M. Assanioussi, J. Lewandowski and I. Mäkinen,Hamiltonian operator for loop quantum gravity coupled to a scalar field, Phys. Rev. D91, 124067 (2015), arXiv:1504.02068 [gr-qc]

2015 arXiv
[10]

Yang and Y

J. Yang and Y. Ma,New Hamiltonian constraint operator for loop quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B751, 343 (2015), arXiv:1507.00986 [gr-qc]

2015 arXiv
[11]

Assanioussi, J

M. Assanioussi, J. Lewandowski and I. Mäkinen,Time evolution in deparametrized models of loop quantum gravity,Phys.Rev.D 96,024043(2017),arXiv: 1702.01688 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[13]

Lewandowski and I

J. Lewandowski and I. Mäkinen, Scalar curvature operator for quantum-reduced loop gravity, Phys. Rev. D107, 126017 (2023), arXiv:2211.04826 [gr-qc]

2023 arXiv
[14]

Dapor and K

A. Dapor and K. Liegener,Cosmological effective Hamiltonian from full loop quan- tum gravity dynamics, Phys. Lett. B785, 506 (2018), arXiv:1706.09833 [gr-qc]

2018 arXiv
[15]

Assanioussi, A

M. Assanioussi, A. Dapor, K. Liegener and T. Pawłowski,Emergent de Sitter epoch of the loop quantum cosmos: a detailed analysis, Phys. Rev. D100, 084003 (2019), arXiv:1906.05315 [gr-qc]

2019 arXiv
[16]

Bianchi, C

E. Bianchi, C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto,Towards spinfoam cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 82, 084035 (2010), arXiv:1003.3483 [gr-qc]

2010 arXiv
[17]

Vidotto, Many-nodes/many-links spinfoam: the homogeneous and isotropic case, Class

F. Vidotto, Many-nodes/many-links spinfoam: the homogeneous and isotropic case, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 245005 (2011), arXiv:1107.2633 [gr-qc]

2011 arXiv
[18]

Bianchi, T

E. Bianchi, T. Krajewski, C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto, Cosmological constant in spinfoam cosmology, Phys. Rev. D83, 104015 (2011), arXiv:1101.4049 [gr-qc]

2011 arXiv
[19]

Rennert and D

J. Rennert and D. Sloan, A homogeneous model of spinfoam cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 235019 (2013), arXiv:1304.6688 [gr-qc]

2013 arXiv
[20]

Rennert and D

J. Rennert and D. Sloan,Anisotropic spinfoam cosmology, Class. Quant. Grav.31, 015017 (2014), arXiv:1308.0687 [gr-qc]

2014 arXiv
[21]

Ashtekar and J

A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski,Quantum theory of geometry. 2. Volume opera- tors, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.1, 388 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9711031

1998 arXiv
[22]

Thiemann, Quantum spin dynamics (QSD), Class

T. Thiemann, Quantum spin dynamics (QSD), Class. Quant. Grav.15, 839 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9606089. 25

1998 arXiv
[23]

Lewandowski and H

J. Lewandowski and H. Sahlmann,Symmetric scalar constraint for loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D91, 044022 (2015), arXiv:1410.5276 [gr-qc]

2015 arXiv
[24]

Assanioussi, J

M. Assanioussi, J. Lewandowski and I. Mäkinen,New scalar constraint operator for loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D92, 044042 (2015), arXiv:1506.00299 [gr-qc]

2015 arXiv
[25]

Rovelli and L

C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, The physical Hamiltonian in nonperturbative quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 446 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9308002

1994 arXiv
[26]

Domagała, K

M. Domagała, K. Giesel, W. Kamiński and J. Lewandowski, Gravity quantized: Loop quantum gravity with a scalar field,Phys.Rev.D 82,104038(2010),arXiv: 1009. 2445 [gr-qc]

2010
[27]

Giesel and T

K. Giesel and T. Thiemann, Scalar material reference systems and loop quantum gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 135015 (2015), arXiv:1206.3807 [gr-qc]

2015 arXiv
[28]

J. D. Brown and K. V. Kuchař,Dust as a standard of space and time in canonical quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D51, 5600 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9409001

1995 arXiv
[29]

Husain and T

V. Husain and T. Pawłowski,Time and a physical Hamiltonian for quantum grav- ity, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 141301 (2012), arXiv:1108.1145 [gr-qc]

2012 arXiv
[30]

Świeżewski, On the properties of the irrotational dust model, Class

J. Świeżewski, On the properties of the irrotational dust model, Class. Quant. Grav. 30, 237001 (2013), arXiv:1307.4687 [gr-qc]

2013 arXiv
[31]

Meurer et al.,SymPy: symbolic computing in Python, PeerJ Computer Science 3, e103 (2017)

A. Meurer et al.,SymPy: symbolic computing in Python, PeerJ Computer Science 3, e103 (2017)

2017
[32]

Ashtekar and E

A. Ashtekar and E. Wilson-Ewing,Loop quantum cosmology of Bianchi I models, Phys. Rev. D79, 083535 (2009), arXiv:0903.3397 [gr-qc]

2009 arXiv
[33]

Chiou, Loop quantum cosmology in Bianchi type I models: Analytical inves- tigation, Phys

D.-W. Chiou, Loop quantum cosmology in Bianchi type I models: Analytical inves- tigation, Phys. Rev. D75, 024029 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0609029

2007 arXiv
[34]

Szulc, Loop quantum cosmology of diagonal Bianchi type I model: Simplifications and scaling problems, Phys

Ł. Szulc, Loop quantum cosmology of diagonal Bianchi type I model: Simplifications and scaling problems, Phys. Rev. D78, 064035 (2008), arXiv:0803.3559 [gr-qc]

2008 arXiv
[35]

Martín-Benito, G

M. Martín-Benito, G. A. Mena Marugán and T. Pawłowski,Loop quantization of vacuum Bianchi I cosmology, Phys. Rev. D78, 064008 (2008), arXiv:0804.3157 [gr-qc]

2008 arXiv
[36]

Wilson-Ewing, Anisotropic loop quantum cosmology with self-dual variables, Phys

E. Wilson-Ewing, Anisotropic loop quantum cosmology with self-dual variables, Phys. Rev. D93, 083502 (2016), arXiv:1512.03684 [gr-qc]

2016 arXiv
[37]

Ashtekar, T

A. Ashtekar, T. Pawłowski and P. Singh,Quantum nature of the Big Bang: Im- proved dynamics, Phys. Rev. D74, 084003 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0607039. 26

2006 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [12]

Lewandowski and I

J. Lewandowski and I. Mäkinen,Scalar curvature operator for models of loop quan- tum gravity on a cubical graph, Phys. Rev. D 106, 046013 (2022), arXiv:2110 . 10667 [gr-qc]

work page 2022

[2] [1]

E.AlesciandF.Cianfrani, A new perspective on cosmology in loop quantum gravity, EPL 104, 10001 (2013), arXiv:1210.4504 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2013

[3] [2]

Alesci and F

E. Alesci and F. Cianfrani,Quantum-reduced loop gravity: Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 87, 083521 (2013), arXiv:1301.2245 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2013

[4] [3]

Loop Quantum Cosmology from Loop Quantum Gravity

E. Alesci and F. Cianfrani, Loop quantum cosmology from quantum reduced loop gravity, EPL 111, 40002 (2015), arXiv:1410.4788 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015

[5] [4]

Alesci and F

E. Alesci and F. Cianfrani, Quantum reduced loop gravity: Universe on a lattice, Phys. Rev. D92, 084065 (2015), arXiv:1506.07835 [gr-qc]. 24

arXiv 2015

[6] [5]

E.AlesciandF.Cianfrani, Quantum reduced loop gravity and the foundation of loop quantum cosmology, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D25, 1642005 (2016), arXiv:1602.05475 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2016

[7] [6]

Mäkinen, Master constraint approach to quantum-reduced loop gravity, Class

I. Mäkinen, Master constraint approach to quantum-reduced loop gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 125010 (2024), arXiv:2311.16648 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2024

[8] [7]

Mäkinen, Operators of quantum-reduced loop gravity from the perspective of full loop quantum gravity, Phys

I. Mäkinen, Operators of quantum-reduced loop gravity from the perspective of full loop quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 102, 106010 (2020), arXiv:2004.00309 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2020