Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 5 cited by

Mass inflation and strong cosmic censorship conjecture in the covariant quantum black hole

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the covariant quantum black hole has an unstable inner horizon and satisfies Strong Cosmic Censorship throughout its dS parameter space.

desk verdict Mass inflation part is clean and new; SCCC part is conditional on an unproven regularity assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.01448 v2 pith:NDXYGGAA submitted 2024-12-02 gr-qc

Jianhui Lin , Xiangdong Zhang , Moisés Bravo-Gaete This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords strongcosmiccensorshipmassinflationCauchyhorizoncovariantquantumblackholequasinormalmodesdeSitterspacetimescalarperturbationsgravity
topics Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the covariant quantum black hole that resembles the Reissner–Nordström solution is a viable alternative to the solution without a Cauchy horizon. It argues that mass inflation occurs at the Cauchy horizon in asymptotically flat spacetime, so the metric cannot be extended as a weak solution and Strong Cosmic Censorship is preserved; this also means the solution is not a regular black hole. After adding a cosmological constant, it computes scalar quasinormal modes over the allowed parameter ranges and finds that the ratio $-\operatorname{Im}(\omega)/\kappa_-$ stays below $1/2$ everywhere, so Strong Cosmic Censorship holds in the dS case as well. If correct, this distinguishes the two proposed solutions on physical grounds and identifies the Cauchy-horizon solution as the less reasonable one.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on two pieces. First, the four-region null-shell junction relation (Eq. (5)): for the regions divided by colliding ingoing and outgoing shells inside the horizon, the metric functions satisfy $|f_A| = |f_C|/(|f_B|\,|f_D|)$, and this relation, combined with the exponential approach $x-x_-\propto e^{-\kappa_- v}$, forces $M_A\to+\infty$. Second, the scalar-mode spectral criterion for Strong Cosmic Censorship in dS spacetime: with $\kappa_-$ the surface gravity of the Cauchy horizon and $\omega$ the quasinormal frequencies of scalar perturbations, the conjecture survives only if $\beta\equiv \inf\{-\operatorname{Im}(\omega)\}/\kappa_- < 1/2$; the numerical work computes $\beta$ across the parameter grid and finds it always below $1/2$.

What would settle it

Compute $G^\hbar_{\mu\nu}$ for the dS metric (17)-(18) and check whether it is locally integrable near $x=x_-$; or search the full mode spectrum, including $l>1$ and higher overtones, for a quasinormal mode with $-\operatorname{Im}(\omega)/\kappa_- \ge 1/2$ inside the allowed parameter region. Either finding would overturn the paper's conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the inner (Cauchy) horizon of the covariant quantum black hole is unstable in two complementary senses. In the asymptotically flat metric (1)-(2), a null-shell calculation with the four-region junction relation (5) shows that the mass parameter in the region adjacent to the Cauchy horizon must diverge as the ingoing shell approaches the horizon, producing a mass-inflation singularity that blocks weak extensions. In the dS extension (17)-(18), the paper evaluates massless scalar perturbations, identifies the dominant quasinormal modes for $l=0,1$, and shows numerically that $-\operatorname{Im}(\omega)/\kappa_- < 1/2$ throughout the physically allowed ranges $0<\zeta/M\lesssim 7.090$ and $0<\Lambda M^2\lesssim0.111$. Because the existence of even one such mode with this inequality is enough to establish Strong Cosmic Censorship in its modern formulation, the paper concludes the conjecture holds over the whole parameter space.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the quantum-corrected Einstein tensor is locally integrable at the Cauchy horizon, so the classical integrability criterion $\beta<1/2$ remains the right test for whether a weak extension exists.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Cauchy horizon of the covariant quantum black hole is not stable; any small ingoing perturbation triggers mass inflation, so the effective spacetime does not remain regular inside.
  • Strong Cosmic Censorship holds for scalar perturbations over the full allowed parameter region of the dS extension.
  • Larger values of $\zeta/M$ move the ratio $-\operatorname{Im}(\omega)/\kappa_-$ closer to $1/2$ but never above it, so the near-extremal region remains censored within this calculation.
  • For higher angular momentum $l$ the late-time decay becomes quasinormal ringing rather than a tail, yet the computed ratio stays below the threshold, so this mechanism does not restore extendibility.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's comparison between the two covariant solutions suggests that the solution without a Cauchy horizon is physically preferred; one could make this explicit by showing that it has no mass-inflation instability by construction.
  • The central assumption that the quantum-corrected Einstein tensor is locally integrable could be tested by deriving $G^\hbar_{\mu\nu}$ from the effective action and checking its behavior at $x=x_-$; if it is less regular than assumed, the scalar-mode criterion would no longer be decisive.
  • The calculation depends on choosing the parameter $\gamma$ that determines $\zeta$; repeating the QNM scan with a different allowed value of $\gamma$ would show whether the conclusion is robust to that ambiguity.
  • A natural next step is to replace the classical scalar field probe with a quantum scalar field; semiclassical results cited in the paper indicate quantum effects can restore the conjecture, suggesting the classical probe may be the conservative case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the covariant loop quantum black hole of Ref. [13], whose metric has an inner (Cauchy) horizon. In Section II, using the generalized Dray-'t Hooft-Redmond relation and the classical Price tail behavior, it argues that the metric function in the region between the outgoing shell and the Cauchy horizon diverges, which forces the local mass M_A to diverge; this is interpreted as mass inflation and as evidence for strong cosmic censorship. In Sections III-IV, the metric is extended by a cosmological constant and the authors compute quasinormal modes of a massless scalar field using pseudospectral and direct integration methods. Tables I-II and Figures 2-4 show that the ratio -Im(omega)/kappa_- remains below 1/2 over the sampled parameter space, which is read via the Christodoulou criterion as meaning that SCCC holds. The paper concludes that the covariant black hole with a Cauchy horizon is not a regular black hole and that the alternative solution without a Cauchy horizon is more reasonable.

Significance. The mass-inflation argument is a clean geometric consequence of the DTR relation and does not require the full quantum field equations, which is an elegant feature. The QNM results are cross-validated by two independent numerical methods, which is commendable. The paper also makes a useful structural point: in this model, mass inflation and SCCC hold despite the regular center, so the Cauchy-horizon-bearing covariant LQG black hole is not singularity-free. However, the central de Sitter conclusion is conditional on an unproven regularity assumption for the quantum-corrected Einstein tensor, and the claim is stronger than the scalar test-field computation supports. The paper is likely of interest to the LQG and black-hole perturbation communities, but the advertised result needs qualification.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III, after Eq. (26)] The dS SCCC result rests on the explicit assumption that the quantum-corrected Einstein tensor G^hbar_mu_nu is locally integrable at the Cauchy horizon. The authors state this assumption and acknowledge that without it they cannot proceed. This is load-bearing because Eq. (27) is the classical Christodoulou criterion, whose validity for the effective theory requires exactly this regularity. Since the exact expression of G^hbar_mu_nu is not given, local integrability cannot be checked; quantum corrections may introduce terms that are less regular than the classical Einstein tensor. The abstract and conclusions should either be made conditional on this assumption or the assumption should be supported by an argument from the effective action (23).
  2. [Section IV, Tables I-II and Figures 3-4] The statement that SCCC holds 'throughout the entire parameter space' is stronger than the evidence presented. Table II contains only three values of zeta/M and three of Lambda M^2; Figure 3 fixes zeta/M=7.090. The density plot in Figure 4 is not accompanied by the underlying numerical data, the resolution of the grid, or error estimates. This matters because the largest computed ratio, 0.4519953 (l=1, zeta/M=7.090, Lambda M^2=0.05), is close to the threshold 1/2, and a small numerical error or parameter drift could change the conclusion near this boundary. Please provide the parameter grid, convergence checks, and a clear definition of 'entire parameter space'.
  3. [Section IV, Eq. (27) and Conclusions] The SCCC conclusion is drawn from massless scalar-field perturbations with l=0,1 only. Strong cosmic censorship is a statement about generic admissible initial data for the full effective theory, which may include gravitational and other matter sectors. The authors' robustness argument, that any mode with smaller damping would only lower the ratio, is valid only within the computed scalar sector; it does not exclude modes that are not governed by Eq. (28). The abstract and conclusions should be qualified to 'for massless scalar-field perturbations' unless the remaining sectors are analyzed.
  4. [Section II, Eqs. (4) and (9)] The mass-inflation argument assumes that the classical Price tail relation M_C proportional to M_B + v^{-p} continues to hold in the effective quantum-corrected spacetime. The authors state this as an expectation, but it is a structural input: Eq. (9), and hence the divergence f_C/f_B ~ v^{-p} e^{kappa_- v} in Eq. (10), depends on it. If quantum corrections alter the late-time tail, for example by changing the exponent p or adding a different decay law, the conclusion M_A -> infinity might not follow. The paper should either verify the tail behavior in the flat quantum metric or explicitly present the mass-inflation result as conditional on this classical relation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III] There is a typo in 'Barbero-lmmirzi parameter' on page 4; it should be 'Barbero-Immirzi'. The text also switches between 'SCC' and 'SCCC'; please standardize.
  2. [Table II] The entries in Table II have irregular spacing, e.g., '0 .1252543' instead of '0.1252543'.
  3. [Section II, after Eq. (7)] For the flat metric, the relation between the mass M and the event horizon x_+ (M = x_+/2) is implicit; stating it explicitly would make the expansion in Eq. (7) easier to follow.
  4. [Eq. (27)] Please state explicitly that kappa_- denotes the surface gravity at the Cauchy horizon of the metric f_Lambda, and clarify whether the infimum is taken only over the computed scalar QNM spectrum.
  5. [Figure 2] The logarithmic scale in Figure 2 should specify its base, and the text should state whether the plotted quantity is |Phi| or log_10(|Phi|).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the QNM and mass-inflation results are computed from the given quantum metric using external classical criteria; the one flagged assumption is an unproven hypothesis, not a circular re-use of the conclusion.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the paper's central claims. The mass-inflation argument in Section II takes the quantum-corrected metric (1)-(2) and applies the DTR relation (5) plus the Price-law tail (4); neither input is derived from the conclusion, and no quantity is fitted to produce a prediction. The dS SCCC analysis computes QNM frequencies from the effective metric (17)-(18) with two independent numerical methods (Table I) and compares -Im(omega)/kappa_- to the external Christodoulou-type bound (27) taken from Ref. [49], which is not by the present authors; the 'entire parameter space' claim is a numerical survey, not a reduction. The only explicitly flagged limitation is the local-integrability assumption for G^hbar in Section III: 'since its exact expression is not yet well understood ... we assume it satisfies local integrability. Without this assumption, we would not be able to proceed with the subsequent discussion.' That is an unproven hypothesis about the effective theory, not a circular re-use of the target conclusion; the paper also states in the summary that the treatment is 'a preliminary exploration' limited to a classical scalar field. Self-citations such as Ref. [10] (Lin and Zhang) appear only in the introductory list of related models and do not carry the derivation. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the same authors, and no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. Hence no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the input metric from Ref [13], the applicability of classical shell relations to the quantum metric, and an explicit unvalidated regularity assumption on the quantum-corrected field equations. There are no new fitted constants in this paper, but the physically allowed parameter region depends on the uncertain choice of the Barbero-Immirzi parameter.

free parameters (1)
  • Barbero-Immirzi parameter gamma = 0.274 (alternative 0.237 in literature)
    The upper bound zeta/M = 7.09 and the allowed Lambda M^2 domain are derived from this choice. The authors note the exact value is theoretically uncertain but do not test the sensitivity of the SCCC conclusion to it.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The effective covariant quantum metric (1) and its dS extension (17) are the correct effective LQG solutions; their derivation in Ref [13] is taken as input.
    The paper builds entirely on the metric equations (1)-(2) and (17)-(18) from Ref [13] without re-deriving them; if the metric is not a valid solution, the conclusions fail.
  • standard math The generalized Dray-'t Hooft-Redmond relation (5) applies to the quantum-corrected metric and is independent of the field equations.
    Used in Section II to connect the metric functions across null shells; the paper cites Refs [44,45] for its validity for this class of metrics.
  • ad hoc to paper The classical mass jump relation (4) applies to the quantum spacetime.
    Explicitly assumed in Section II: the paper says quantum corrections should primarily play a role in the ultraviolet region, so Price's tail relation is expected to hold.
  • domain assumption The quantum-corrected Einstein tensor G^hbar_mu_nu satisfies local integrability at the Cauchy horizon.
    Explicitly assumed in Section III: the paper states 'we assume it satisfies local integrability. Without this assumption, we would not be able to proceed with the subsequent discussion.' This is load-bearing for the SCCC criterion.
  • domain assumption The classical massless scalar field is a valid probe; quantum correction terms L_hbar in the action do not alter the scalar equation of motion.
    Section III, Eq. (28) uses the standard Klein-Gordon equation; the paper acknowledges in the conclusions that a quantum scalar field within LQG would be more appropriate.
  • domain assumption The Christodoulou SCCC criterion beta < 1/2 remains valid for the quantum-corrected theory.
    Section III, Eq. (27), taken from Ref [49]; assumes the threshold for weak extendibility in the effective quantum theory is the same as in classical GR.
  • domain assumption The parameter ranges 0 < zeta/M <= 7.09 and 0 < Lambda M^2 <= 0.111 are the physically reasonable ones.
    Section III: derived from setting the area gap equal to the minimum horizon area and fixing gamma = 0.274; the paper notes gamma is uncertain (0.237 vs 0.274).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mass inflation and strong cosmic censorship conjecture in the covariant quantum black hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NDXYGGAA

@misc{pith2026241201448,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mass inflation and strong cosmic censorship conjecture in the covariant quantum black hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NDXYGGAA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.01448}
}
read the original abstract

Recently, two types of solutions to the long-standing issue of general covariance in canonical quantum gravity have been proposed. From the above, a fundamental question arises: which solution is superior? Considering one type of solution with a Cauchy horizon, in the present letter, we explore whether it exhibits properties similar to those of the Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m black hole. Due to its geometric similarity, application of the generalized Dray-'t Hooft-Redmond relation reveals evidence of mass inflation, indicating that the Cauchy horizon is unstable. While this is consistent with the Strong Cosmic Censorship conjecture, it suggests that it does not represent a regular black hole. Furthermore, we extend the metric to include a cosmological constant and study the validity of the Strong Cosmic Censorship conjecture for the quantum black hole in de Sitter spacetime. After taking into account the reasonable ranges of parameters for the quantum black hole, we find that the Strong Cosmic Censorship Conjecture holds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.01448 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Penrose diagram, which provides a simplified [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The density plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scalar perturbations and strong cosmic censorship in a regular ABGB-de Sitter black hole spacetime

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In regular ABGB-de Sitter black holes, near-extremal scalar perturbations decay fast enough (β>1/2) to violate strong cosmic censorship, and adding scalar mass can push the regularity parameter past β=1.

  2. Dust shell in effective loop quantum black hole model

    gr-qc 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a polymerized loop-quantum-gravity black hole model, a collapsing dust shell bounces and, for sufficiently heavy shells, follows a spacelike trajectory through the horizon, implying a finite horizon lifetime and a ...

  3. Evaporation and fate of covariant quantum black holes

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For a covariant LQG black-hole metric, Hawking mass-loss rates depend on emitted-particle spin and deviate from Schwarzschild rates only for sub-Planckian masses.

  4. Motion of spinning particles around a quantum-corrected black hole without Cauchy horizons

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For the covariant quantum-corrected black hole without Cauchy horizons, the effective potential, circular orbits, ISCO, and bound trajectories of spinning particles depend only weakly on the quantum parameter but stro...

  5. Periodic orbits and gravitational waveforms in quantum-corrected black hole spacetimes

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For one effective quantum gravity black hole model (BH-I), the quantum parameter shifts periodic orbits and delays gravitational wave phase, while for the other model (BH-II) the effect is negligible, making BH-I pote...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [13]

    Zhang, J

    C. Zhang, J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma, and J. Yang, Black holes and covariance in effective quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 111, L081504 (2025), https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.111.L081504

    work page 2025

  2. [1]

    Penrose, Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Sin- gularities, Phys

    R. Penrose, Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Sin- gularities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57 (1965),https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.57

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.14.57 1965

  3. [2]

    Ashtekar and J

    A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, Background indepen- dent quantum gravity: a status report, Class. Quan- tum Grav. 21, R53 (2004),https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0264-9381/21/15/R01

    work page 2004

  4. [3]

    T.Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Rela- tivity (CambridgeUniversityPress, Cambridge, England, 2007), https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755682

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755682 2007

  5. [4]

    M. Han, W. Huang, Y. Ma, Fundamental Structure of Loop Quantum Gravity, International Journal of Modern Physics D - INT J MOD PHYS D 16 (2005), https: //doi.org/10.1142/S0218271807010894

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271807010894 2005

  6. [5]

    Gambini, J

    R. Gambini, J. Pullin, Black Holes in Loop Quan- tum Gravity: The Complete Space-Time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 161301 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.101.161301

    work page 2008

  7. [6]

    Ashtekar, J

    A. Ashtekar, J. Olmedo, P. Singh, Quantum Transfigura- tion of Kruskal Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 241301 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121. 241301

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121 2018

  8. [7]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y. Ma, S. Song, X. Zhang, Loop quantum Schwarzschild interior and black hole remnant, Phys. Rev. D 102, 041502 (2020),https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.102.041502

    work page 2020

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    J.G.Kelly, R.Santacruz, E.Wilson-Ewing, Effectiveloop quantum gravity framework for vacuum spherically sym- metric spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 102, 106024 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.106024

    2020 doi

  2. [9]

    Zhang, Y

    C. Zhang, Y. Ma, S. Song, X. Zhang, Loop quantum deparametrized Schwarzschild interior and discrete black hole mass, Phys. Rev. D 105, 024069 (2022),https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.024069

    2022 doi

  3. [10]

    Lin and X

    J. Lin and X. Zhang, Effective four-dimensional loop quantum black hole with a cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D 110, no.2, 026002 (2024),https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.110.026002

    2024

  4. [12]

    Zhang, Loop Quantum Black Hole,” Universe 9, no.7, 313 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3390/ universe9070313

    X. Zhang, Loop Quantum Black Hole,” Universe 9, no.7, 313 (2023), https://doi.org/10.3390/ universe9070313

    2023

  5. [14]

    Husin Belfaqih, M

    I. Husin Belfaqih, M. Bojowald, S. Brahma, E. I. Duque, Black holes in effective loop quantum gravity: Co- variant holonomy modifications, https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2407.12087

    doi arXiv

  6. [15]

    Zhang, J

    C. Zhang, J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma, and J. Yang, Black holes and covariance in effective quantum gravity: A so- lution without Cauchy horizons, (2024), https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.02487

    2024 doi

  7. [16]

    R. A. Konoplya and O. S. Stashko, Probing the Effec- tive Quantum Gravity via Quasinormal Modes and Shad- ows of Black Holes, (2024),https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2408.02578,

    2024 doi arXiv

  8. [17]

    Malik, Perturbations and Quasinormal Modes of the Dirac Field in Effective Quantum Gravity (2024),https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.01561

    Z. Malik, Perturbations and Quasinormal Modes of the Dirac Field in Effective Quantum Gravity (2024),https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.01561

    2024 doi arXiv

  9. [19]

    Heidari, A

    N. Heidari, A. A. A. Filho, R. C. Pantig, and A. Övgün, Absorption, scattering, geodesics, shadows and lensing phenomena of black holes in effective quantum gravity, Physics of the Dark Universe 47, 101815 (2025),https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.101815

    2025

  10. [20]

    L.-G. Zhu, G. Fu, S. Li, D. Zhang, and J.-P. Wu, Quasi- normal modes of a charged loop quantum black hole, Phys. Rev. D 111, 104008 (2025),https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.111.104008

    2025

  11. [21]

    Lan, Z.-X

    C. Lan, Z.-X. Liu, and Y.-G. Miao, Generalization of on-shell construction of Ricci-flat axisymmetric black holes from Schwazschild black holes via Newman-Janis algorithm, (2024), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2410.02178

    2024 doi

  12. [22]

    W. Liu, D. Wu, and J. Wang, Light rings and shad- ows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity, Physics Letters B 858, 139052 (2024),https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139052

    2024

  13. [23]

    Liu, M.-Y

    H. Liu, M.-Y. Lai, X.-Y. Pan, H. Huang, and D.-C. Zou, Gravitational lensing effect of black holes in effec- tive quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 110, 104039 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.104039

    2024 doi

  14. [24]

    Z. Ban, J. Chen, and J. Yang, Shadows of rotating black holes in effective quantum gravity, arXiv E-Prints arXiv:2411.09374 (2024), https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2411.09374

    2024 doi arXiv

  15. [25]

    Christodoulou, On the global initial value problem and the issue of singularities, Classical and Quantum Gravity 16, A23 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0264-9381/16/12A/302 9

    D. Christodoulou, On the global initial value problem and the issue of singularities, Classical and Quantum Gravity 16, A23 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0264-9381/16/12A/302 9

    1999

  16. [26]

    R. A. Matzner, N. Zamorano, and V. D. Sandberg, Insta- bility of the Cauchy horizon of Reissner-Nordström black holes, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2821 (1979),https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.2821

    1979 doi

  17. [27]

    Poisson and W

    E. Poisson and W. Israel, Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1663 (1989), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 63.1663

    1989 doi

  18. [28]

    Ori, Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact mass-inflation solution, Phys

    A. Ori, Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact mass-inflation solution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 789 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.789

    1991 doi

  19. [29]

    Carballo-Rubio, F

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pa- cilio, and M. Visser, Inner horizon instability and the unstable cores of regular black holes, Journal of High Energy Physics 2021, 132 (2021),https://doi.org/10. 1007/JHEP05(2021)132

    2021

  20. [30]

    M. Z. Iofa, On the Mass Function at the Inner Horizon of a Regular Black Hole, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 135, 647 (2022),https://doi.org/ 10.1134/S1063776122110048

    2022 doi

  21. [31]

    Carballo-Rubio, F

    R. Carballo-Rubio, F. Di Filippo, S. Liberati, C. Pacilio, andM.Visser, Regularblackholeswithoutmassinflation instability, Journal of High Energy Physics 2022, (2022), https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)118

    2022 doi

  22. [32]

    Bojowald, S

    M. Bojowald, S. Brahma, Juan D. Reyes, Covariance in models of loop quantum gravity: Spherical symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 92, 045043 (2015),https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevD.92.045043

    2015

  23. [33]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Class. Quantum Grav. 26, 163001 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0264-9381/26/16/163001

    2009

  24. [34]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Quasi-Normal Modes of Stars and Black Holes, Living Rev. Relativ. 2, (1999), https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-1999-2

    1999 doi

  25. [35]

    Destounis and F

    K. Destounis and F. Duque, Black-Hole Spectroscopy: Quasinormal Modes, Ringdown Stability and the Pseu- dospectrum, in Compact Objects in the Universe, edited by E. Papantonopoulos and N. Mavromatos (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024), pp. 155–202,https: //doi.org/10.100...

    2024 doi

  26. [36]

    Cardoso, J

    V. Cardoso, J. L. Costa, K. Destounis, P. Hintz, and A. Jansen, Quasinormal Modes and Strong Cosmic Cen- sorship, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 031103 (2018), https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.031103

    2018 doi

  27. [37]

    Cardoso, J

    V. Cardoso, J. L. Costa, K. Destounis, P. Hintz, and A. Jansen, Strong cosmic censorship in charged black-hole spacetimes: Still subtle, Phys. Rev. D 98, 104007 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.104007

    2018 doi

  28. [38]

    Destounis, Charged fermions and strong cosmic cen- sorship, Physics Letters B 795, 211 (2019),https://doi

    K. Destounis, Charged fermions and strong cosmic cen- sorship, Physics Letters B 795, 211 (2019),https://doi. org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.015

    2019 doi

  29. [39]

    H. Liu, Z. Tang, K. Destounis, B. Wang, E. Pa- pantonopoulos, and H. Zhang, Strong Cosmic Censor- ship in higher-dimensional Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter spacetime, J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, (2019), https: //doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2019)187

    2019 doi

  30. [40]

    Destounis, R

    K. Destounis, R. D. B. Fontana, and F. C. Mena, Sta- bility of the Cauchy horizon in accelerating black-hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 102, 104037 (2020), https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.104037

    2020 doi

  31. [41]

    Destounis, R

    K. Destounis, R. D. B. Fontana, F. C. Mena, and E. Papantonopoulos, Strong cosmic censorship in Horndeski theory, J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 280 (2019),https: //doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2019)280

    2019 doi

  32. [42]

    O. J. C. Dias, F. C. Eperon, H. S. Reall, and J. E. San- tos, Strong cosmic censorship in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 97, 104060 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.97.104060

    2018

  33. [43]

    Poisson and W

    E. Poisson and W. Israel, Internal structure of black holes, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1796 (1990).https://doi.org/ 10.1103/physrevd.41.1796

    1990 doi

  34. [45]

    Cao, L.-Y

    L.-M. Cao, L.-Y. Li, L.-B. Wu, and Y.-S. Zhou, The in- stability of the inner horizon of the quantum-corrected black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 507 (2024), https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12832-4

    2024 doi

  35. [46]

    R. H. Price, Nonspherical Perturbations of Relativis- tic Gravitational Collapse. I. Scalar and Gravitational Perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 5, 2419 (1972), https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.5.2439

    1972 doi

  36. [47]

    Bambi, J

    C. Bambi, J. F. Barbero G., and D. Pranzetti, Black Hole Entropy in Loop Quantum Gravity, in Handbook of Quantum Gravity, edited by L. Modesto and I. Shapiro (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023), pp. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3079-9_104-1

    2023 doi

  37. [48]

    R. P. Vyas and M. J. Joshi, The Barbero–Immirzi Param- eter: An Enigmatic Parameter of Loop Quantum Grav- ity, Physics 4, 1094 (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/ physics4040072

    2022

  38. [49]

    C.-Y. Shao, C. Zhang, W. Zhang, and C.-G. Shao, Scalar fields around a loop quantum gravity black hole in de Sitter spacetime: Quasinormal modes, late-time tails and strong cosmic censorship, Phys. Rev. D 109, 064012 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 109.064012

    2024 doi

  39. [50]

    Christodoulou, The Formation of Black Holes in Gen- eral Relativity, EMS Monographs in Mathematics (Eu- ropean Mathematical Society, Zurich, 2009)

    D. Christodoulou, The Formation of Black Holes in Gen- eral Relativity, EMS Monographs in Mathematics (Eu- ropean Mathematical Society, Zurich, 2009)

    2009

  40. [51]

    Jansen, Overdamped modes in Schwarzschild-de Sitter and a Mathematica package for the numeri- cal computation of quasinormal modes, Eur

    A. Jansen, Overdamped modes in Schwarzschild-de Sitter and a Mathematica package for the numeri- cal computation of quasinormal modes, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 546 (2017),https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/ i2017-11825-9

    2017 doi

  41. [52]

    L. A. H. Mamani, A. D. D. Masa, L. T. Sanches, and V. T. Zanchin, Revisiting the quasinormal modes of the Schwarzschild black hole: Numerical analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 897 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-022-10865-1

    2022 doi

  42. [53]

    PANI, ADVANCED METHODS IN BLACK-HOLE PERTURBATION THEORY, International Journal of Modern Physics A 28, 1340018 (2013), https://doi

    P. PANI, ADVANCED METHODS IN BLACK-HOLE PERTURBATION THEORY, International Journal of Modern Physics A 28, 1340018 (2013), https://doi. org/10.1142/S0217751X13400186

    2013 doi

  43. [54]

    Further discussions on quantum scalar fields at the Cauchy horizon can be found in Refs

    considers a quantum scalar field in RN-dS spacetime, andshowsthatquantumeffectscanrestorethevalidityof the SCCC. Further discussions on quantum scalar fields at the Cauchy horizon can be found in Refs. [55, 56]. We look forward to future studies of coupled scalar fields in the...

  44. [55]

    Hollands, R

    S. Hollands, R. M. Wald, and J. Zahn, Quan- tum instability of the Cauchy horizon in Reiss- ner–Nordström–deSitter spacetime, Class. Quantum Grav. 37, 115009 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6382/ab8052

    2020

  45. [56]

    Hintz and C

    P. Hintz and C. K. M. Klein, Universality of the quan- tum energy flux at the inner horizon of asymptotically de Sitter black holes, Class. Quantum Grav. 41, 075006 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ad2cee

    2024 doi

  46. [57]

    Arrechea, G

    J. Arrechea, G. Neri, and S. Liberati, Inner Hori- zon Instability via the Trace Anomaly Effective Action, arXiv:2411.14964, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 10 2411.14964

    doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.