Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 215 references

Entanglement and decoherence in cosmology and in analogue gravity experiments

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Phonon collisions, not a failed mechanism, can explain the missing entanglement in an analogue preheating experiment.

desk verdict A careful thesis-by-papers whose genuinely new synthesis result is honest but conditional; the published core is solid, and the Sec 3.6 argument is hedged enough to survive the missing threshold derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02444 v1 pith:ZWFW3NVV submitted 2024-12-03 gr-qc cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Amaury Micheli This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qccond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords entanglementdecoherenceanaloguegravitypreheatingBeliaev-LandaudampingquantumdiscordinflationaryperturbationsBose-Einsteincondensate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This thesis argues that the absence of quantum entanglement in the first analogue preheating experiment does not mean the experiment failed to produce entangled pairs from the vacuum; rather, the entanglement was destroyed by scattering of the produced phonons off the gas's thermal quasi-particle population. The author derives Beliaev and Landau damping rates for a quasi-one-dimensional Bose gas and shows that the lifetime of the ±k pair correlation equals the lifetime of the mode populations, a relation that had previously been assumed in effective models. Using an entanglement-witness threshold taken from the literature, he concludes that these damping processes might be sufficient to explain the null entanglement result, and he identifies regimes in which a future run could still witness entanglement. In a companion analysis of inflationary perturbations, the thesis shows that under environmental decoherence quantum discord can persist in some regimes and disappear in others, and that different quantumness criteria are inequivalent for the same mixed squeezed state.

What carries the argument

The working object is the two-mode squeezed state of opposite-momentum phonon pairs, generated by parametric resonance when the condensate's radial oscillation drives the longitudinal modes. To treat the one-dimensional gas, the thesis adopts a quasi-condensate quantum-hydrodynamic description in terms of density and phase fluctuations, from which the dominant interaction processes are Beliaev and Landau damping, that is, one phonon splitting into two or scattering off a thermal quasi-particle. The key identity is the equality between the correlation lifetime of the ±k pairs and the population lifetime of the resonant modes, which converts the computed damping rates into a statement about the entanglement witness.

What would settle it

Measure the two-mode correlation function and the mode occupation as functions of time in a new run with a substantially reduced thermal fraction; if the correlation lifetime is measured to be significantly longer than the population lifetime, or if entanglement is witnessed over the full drive duration, the equality of lifetimes and the proposed sufficiency of Beliaev-Landau damping would be ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that quasi-particle interactions, specifically Beliaev and Landau damping stimulated by the thermal population, provide a concrete mechanism that accounts for the failure to witness entanglement in the analogue preheating experiment. In the quasi-condensate quantum-hydrodynamic description of the one-dimensional gas, the decay rate of the two-mode correlation is shown to match the decay rate of the average mode occupation, so with the experiment's parameters the correlations drop below the entanglement-witness threshold within the duration of the run. The thesis also demonstrates that the mixed two-mode squeezed state produced by parametric amplification behaves differently under different quantumness criteria once decoherence is included: quantum discord survives in some regimes, and the criteria are inequivalent.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion rests on the quasi-condensate quantum-hydrodynamic description of the one-dimensional gas being the effective theory that captures the dominant dissipation channels for the resonant modes, together with the literature's entanglement-witness threshold being accurate for the experiment's observables.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A future run of the analogue preheating experiment that lowers the initial thermal quasi-particle population should see the entanglement witness survive longer; the computed lifetimes set the required cooling or isolation.
  • The equality between correlation and population lifetimes validates the dissipative effective model used to describe parametric production in the presence of interactions.
  • In the inflationary context, quantum discord of the perturbation modes is not always erased by decoherence; in some regimes the correlations remain quantum at the end of inflation.
  • Because the three quantumness criteria are inequivalent for the same mixed squeezed state, claims about the quantumness of cosmological perturbations must specify which criterion is being used.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Beliaev-Landau explanation is correct, the same damping should also suppress other non-classical signatures, such as sub-shot-noise number-difference variances of the produced pairs, allowing a consistency check with existing data.
  • The correlation-population lifetime equality may hold more generally than the specific experiment, suggesting a universal bound on how long vacuum-amplified pair correlations can survive in interacting Bose gases, which could be tested in other analogue-cosmology platforms.
  • The inequivalence of quantumness criteria implies that searches for the quantum origin of cosmological structure should be paired with a measurement scheme that targets a chosen criterion; a null result for one criterion would not rule out quantumness according to another.
  • A direct extension would be to promote the thermal population from an external input to a dynamically evolving quantity coupled to the produced phonons, checking whether resonance back-reaction shortens the entanglement lifetime further.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This thesis-by-publication addresses the generation and destruction of quantum correlations in two settings: inflationary cosmological perturbations and a quasi-one-dimensional analogue-preheating experiment with a metastable-helium Bose gas. In Chapter 2, the author reproduces a review and two articles that compute quantum discord of opposite-momentum cosmological perturbations under Caldeira-Leggett decoherence and compare three quantumness criteria on the same family of mixed two-mode squeezed states. In Chapter 3, the thesis models the 1D Bose gas via the Madelung/quantum-hydrodynamic description, derives Beliaev-Landau damping lifetimes for phonons, validates them against truncated Wigner approximation simulations, and argues in Sec. 3.6 that these interaction-induced decay processes may suffice to explain the failure to witness entanglement in the first analogue-preheating run.

Significance. If the central claim of Sec. 3.6 holds, the thesis supplies a microphysical mechanism, quasiparticle collisions rather than a failure of vacuum amplification, for the null entanglement result of the analogue preheating experiment, and it provides quantitative decay rates that could be used to optimize future runs. The Chapter 2 results are a useful systematic comparison: they show that discord can survive Caldeira-Leggett decoherence in some regimes and that non-separability, discord, and Bell inequalities are inequivalent for the same mixed two-mode squeezed states. The strengths of the manuscript are its explicit derivations from stated models (Gaussian covariance matrices; the 1D quantum-hydrodynamics Hamiltonian), the absence of ad hoc parameters beyond the environment coupling strength and the thermal quasiparticle population, and the confirmation of the analytical Beliaev-Landau lifetimes by TWA simulations. The conclusions are honestly hedged in the abstract, but the quantitative sufficiency argument in Sec. 3.6 is less complete than the rest of the derivation chain.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 3.6] The sufficiency claim that Beliaev-Landau damping can explain the absence of entanglement rests on an entanglement-witness threshold imported from the literature, but the thesis neither derives this threshold nor tests its sensitivity to the experimental parameters, including the initial thermal occupation discussed in Sec. 3.5.1-b, the squeezing amplitude, and the precise observable used in the experiment. Equality of the population and correlation lifetimes is not by itself a no-entanglement proof: for a two-mode squeezed state under pure loss, both lifetimes can coincide while the state remains entangled. To establish sufficiency one must show that the damping drives the covariance matrix across the separability boundary for the relevant witness. I ask that the thesis either provide the threshold calculation, with the precise witness operator and its uncertainty, or explicitly weaken the conclusion from 'might be sufficient' to 'is consistent with the observed null result.'
  2. [Sec. 3.3.4] The Beliaev-Landau damping rates, and hence the Sec. 3.6 conclusion, are derived in the Madelung/quantum-hydrodynamic description adopted because Bogoliubov-de Gennes fails in one dimension. The thesis should state more explicitly how corrections to this effective description, such as higher-order phonon interactions or the residual role of the non-condensed fraction, could modify the computed lifetimes, and whether the TWA simulations share the same effective model or provide an independent check. As written, the dominant-channel assumption is an untested load-bearing point for the central claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 1.1.4-a] There is a typo in the phrase 'with respect ot the CMB'; it should read 'with respect to the CMB.'
  2. [Chapt. 2] The Caldeira-Leggett calculations are parametric in the environment coupling strength and its time dependence, so the results are regime statements rather than unique cosmological predictions. This is appropriate for the stated goal, but the chapter would benefit from an explicit sentence stating that the boundaries of the quantumness-preserving and quantumness-erasing regimes shift with the unspecified coupling.
  3. [Sec. 2.2] The review correctly notes that two additional references on decoherence from isocurvature perturbations were missed at the time of writing; this is an honest and useful admission, and those references should be incorporated into the final version.
  4. [Sec. 1.2.3-b] The notation z for both redshift and the Mukhanov-Sasaki variable is potentially confusing; the manuscript mentions a fraktur font, but the distinction is not visible in the arXiv rendering and should be made typographically robust.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central derivations are parameter-free from stated models, and the Sec 3.6 sufficiency claim is explicitly conditional on an external literature threshold.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Chapter 2's discord and quantumness-criteria results are obtained by exact algebra on Gaussian covariance matrices under a stated Caldeira-Leggett model; the assumptions (Gaussianity, form of coupling, initial two-mode squeezed state) do not contain the target conclusions (regimes of discord survival, inequivalence of the three criteria). Chapter 3's Beliaev-Landau rates are derived from the 1D quantum-hydrodynamic Hamiltonian, with the TWA simulations solving the same microscopic model rather than being fitted to the no-entanglement conclusion, so the numerical agreement is an independent check. In Sec 3.6 the correlation-lifetime result is presented as a derived equality; the French synthesis explicitly notes that this equality was previously assumed in an effective model, and the thesis obtains it from the damping calculation rather than imposing it. The sufficiency claim is explicitly conditional, being based on an entanglement-witness threshold 'estimé dans la littérature' plus an initial thermal population from the experimental parameters; these are external inputs, not quantities chosen to force the conclusion. No equation-level reduction of a prediction to a fit or to a self-citation is exhibited, so there is no significant circularity; at most one can question the robustness of the sufficiency conclusion to the imported threshold, which is a sensitivity issue, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard QFTCS/inflationary assumptions (Bunch-Davies vacuum, Gaussian squeezing), two effective models (Caldeira-Leggett environment; 1D quantum hydrodynamics replacing BdG), the dominance of Beliaev-Landau channels, the faithfulness of TWA simulations, and an external literature threshold. No new particles, forces or fields are introduced; the model environment of the Caldeira-Leggett bath is a standard tool, not an invented entity. The main free input in the cosmological part is the environment coupling strength; in the analogue part the thermal phonon population comes from the experiment. These inputs, rather than hidden postulates, carry the tuning freedom of the argument.

free parameters (2)
  • Caldeira-Leggett environment coupling strength and its time dependence (Part 2) = not fixed in the visible text
    In the reproduced discord article (Chapt 2.3), decoherence is introduced through a Caldeira-Leggett model that preserves Gaussianity; the synthesis states the interaction is parameterised by its time dependence in the scale factor.
  • Thermal quasi-particle population n_k of the 1D gas (stimulated damping rates) = taken from the experimental conditions of the analogue preheating run
    Beliaev and Landau decay rates are proportional to the thermal phonon population (Sec 3.4 / 3.6); the conclusion that correlations decay fast enough relies on this experimental input, which is measured externally rather than fitted to the target result. It is listed because the central claim is sensitive to it.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Inflationary curvature/tensor perturbations begin in the Bunch-Davies vacuum and evolve under a quadratic Hamiltonian into two-mode squeezed Gaussian states.
    Used throughout Chapt 1.2.3-d and the reproduced articles [1,2,3]; it is the standard paradigm of inflationary structure formation, not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Caldeira-Leggett master equation with a Gaussian-preserving environment adequately models the decoherence of cosmological perturbations.
    Core model of Sec 2.3 (discord article); the environmental spectral density and coupling are not derived from microphysics, and the persistence of discord depends on them.
  • domain assumption A 1D Bose gas is described by quantum hydrodynamics (Madelung/quasi-condensate) in the phonon regime; BdG fails in 1D.
    Sec 3.3.4-a 'Failure of BdG in 1D gas' motivates the density-phase perturbative scheme from which the Beliaev-Landau rates are computed; the effective description is assumed to capture the dominant dissipation.
  • domain assumption Beliaev and Landau processes are the dominant interaction channels for the produced phonons.
    Sec 3.4 and 3.6: the computed lifetimes are for these two channels; other processes (e.g., higher-order phonon scattering) are neglected, and integrability-related effects in 1D are not treated.
  • domain assumption The TWA reproduces the 1D gas dynamics faithfully for the experimental parameters.
    Sec 3.5: TWA simulations confirm the analytical lifetimes; TWA validity at the relevant interaction strengths, densities and temperatures is assumed.
  • domain assumption The entanglement-witness threshold estimated in the literature is correct.
    Sec 3.6: the conclusion that the processes 'seem sufficient' is drawn by comparing the computed correlation lifetime with a threshold 'estimated in the literature'; if the threshold is wrong, the conclusion changes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Entanglement and decoherence in cosmology and in analogue gravity experiments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZWFW3NVV

@misc{pith2026241202444,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Entanglement and decoherence in cosmology and in analogue gravity experiments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZWFW3NVV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02444}
}
read the original abstract

This thesis is dedicated to analysing the generation and destruction of quantum correlations in the context of inflationary cosmology and an experiment of 'analogue' preheating. Inflation is a phase of accelerated expansion of the Universe, preceding the so-called Standard Model of Big Bang cosmology, introduced to solve some shortcomings of this model. It also provides a mechanism for the emergence of primordial inhomogeneities by amplification of initial quantum fluctuations. Inflation is followed by a 'reheating' period, in which most particles are expected to be generated and reach thermal equilibrium, setting the stage for the standard Big Bang of cosmology. During a 'preheating' period, this creation proceeds partly by parametric excitation of resonant modes of the matter fields initially in their vacuum, a genuine quantum process. The physics of both situations, inflation and preheating, is that of a strong classical field acting on a quantum field to produce entangled (quasi-)particles. When the classical source is the space-time metric itself, as in inflation, we are in the framework of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-time (QFTCS). The evolution of the generated quantum correlations is the topic of this PhD.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.02444 by the authors.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Energy densities of the different constituents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_1_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.2. Evolution of the scale factor a(t) as a function of cosmic time t. The dashed curve is obtained by numerically solving Eq. (1.28) backwards in time starting from present-day values given in Tab. 1.1.3-a. The red curve shows the piece-wise approximation computed in Eq. (1.40). The dotted lines show the ap￾proximate redshifts of transition given in Tab. 1.1. 30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_1_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.3
Figure 1.3. CMB map as measured by the satellite Planck [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_1_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (30 more)
Figure 1.4
Figure 1.4. Figure 1.4: Evolution of the field φ, its time-derivative φ˙ and the first flow function ϵ1, as a function of the number of e-folds N in R2 -inflation with potential (1.82). Inflation is taken to start at N = 0 where √ κ φin = 5.5 while φ˙ in is given by Eq. (1.78) evaluated at …
Figure 1.5
Figure 1.5. Figure 1.5: Trajectories in the phase-plane (φ, φ˙) in R2 -inflation with poten￾tial (1.82). The red lines show the exact trajectories obtained by numerically solving Eq. (1.69) and Eqs. (1.72) for different initial conditions. The green line shows the slow-roll trajectory evalu…
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Phase-space √ 2 -σ contour levels of the Wigner function W¯ . The pink circle corresponds to a vacuum state (coherent state) with p = 1 and van￾ishing squeezing parameter r = 0. The green ellipse represents a pure state p = 1, slightly squeezed r = 1 along the diagonal…
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Hyperbolic tangent of the quantum discord tanh [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p209_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Same criteria as in Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p211_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hyperbolic tangent of the quantum discord tanh [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p221_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Hyperbolic tangent of the quantum discord tanh [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p222_5.png]
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: In red, 2-point correlation function g (2) k of Eq. (3.64) as measured after opening the trap in the experiment [130]. This figure is adapted from [130] with only a change of colors. 225 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p225_3_2.png]
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: (Upper panel) Behaviour of σ, the radial extension of the condensate, under a modulation of the transverse trapping frequency ω⊥ according to ω 2 ⊥ = ω 2 ⊥ [1 + A sin (ωmt)]. σ is adimensionalised by the transverse size a⊥ associated to ω⊥, and the time is adimension…
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: Evolution of the number of quasi-particles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p243_3_4.png]
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.5. Figure 3.5: Evolution of the number of quasi-particles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p245_3_5.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Snapshots of the phonon number spectrum at times [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p257_1.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Best fit values for ~Γk extracted from the TWA simulations, as a function of kξ. All other physical parameters are fixed at the values shown, while numerical parameters are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p261_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mean occupation of the resonant mode as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p262_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Best fit values for ~Γk extracted from the TWA sim￾ulations as a function of kBT /ρ0ξ. (We divide by mc2 to adi￾mensionalize.) The temperature is kept fixed to kBT /mc2 = 2 and only the density is varied ρ0ξ ∈ [33, 399]. The parameters that are fixed in each run are li…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Snapshots of the ratio Rq = δnq δnk as a function of qξ at time t/tξ = 13.5 (top) and t/tξ = 22.5 (bottom). The spectrum is plotted for ρ0ξ = 399 (red) and ρ0ξ = 33 (green). They are obtained by a continuous modulation of the type Eq. (24) with a = 0.5 and at the appro…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Best fit values for ~Γk extracted from the TWA simulations as a function of kξ. The window shown here is larger than that of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p271_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plots of the Rabi frequencies associated to Landau and Beliaev damping processes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p271_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Number of phonons nk in the mode kξ = 0.3 (top left), kξ = 1.3 (top right), kξ = 2.4 (bottom left), kξ = 3.4 (bottom left) as a function of time t/tξ for kBT /mc2 = 2, ρ0ξ = 49.9, L/ξ = 90.5 and nr = 400 realisations. Each plots is comprised of nt = 140 points. The red…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Red dots are the best fit values for αkt 2 ξ extracted from the TWA simulations using a template of the form of Eq. (54). The green dashed line is the prediction for αkt 2 ξ of equation Eq. (55). The simulation parameters are kBT /mc2 = 2, ρ0ξ = 49.9 and L/ξ = 90.5 wi…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Number of phonons nk in the mode kξ = 2.4 (left.), kξ = 3.1 (right.) as a function of time t/tξ for kBT /mc2 = 2, ρ0ξ = 49.9 and nr = 400 realisations. The red dots correspond to L/ξ = 90.5 and the green ones to L/ξ = 181. The key to understanding this effect is the q…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (Left) Plot of γkt 2 ξ as a function of kξ. The parameters and data used are the same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p275_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Number of non-thermal phonons δnk as of function of kξ at t/tξ = 50 (top left.), and t/tξ = 25 (bottom left.), when δn = 10 phonons were initially added in the mode kξ = 1.4 (top left.), or kξ = 3.1 (bottom left.). This number is shown in full line for different value…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Logarithm of the mean occupation of the resonant mode (green) and its nearest neighbours on either sides (red, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p278_14.png]
Figure 3.7
Figure 3.7. Figure 3.7: (Top panel) Periodic Bogoliubov-de Gennes dispersion relation given [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p288_3_7.png]
Figure 3.8
Figure 3.8. Figure 3.8: Average number of phonons (3.57a) as a function of the wavenumber kξ, for the Madelung and the BdG states, at two different times. This number is compared to a thermal distribution (3.72) of phonons associated with the tem￾perature T shown in dashed lines. The two pa…
Figure 3.9
Figure 3.9. Figure 3.9: Density-density correlation (3.62) as a function of the wavenumber kξ, for the Madelung and the BdG states, at two different times. The results of the numerical simulations are compared to the prediction (3.63) for a thermal state of phonons, where nk = n th k and ck…
Figure 3.10
Figure 3.10. Figure 3.10: Gaussian approximation of the total entropy, given in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p298_3_10.png]
Figure 3.11
Figure 3.11. Figure 3.11: Evolution of the number of quasi-particles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p300_3_11.png]
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Hyperbolic tangent of the quantum discord [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p305_4_1.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

215 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Quantum cosmological gravitational waves?, November 2022

    Amaury Micheli and Patrick Peter. Quantum cosmological gravitational waves?, November 2022. [Cited in Structure, 1.2.3-b, 1.2.3-d, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 3.3.2-d, 3.3.3-a, 3.3.3-c, 3.5.1-b, 4, and 4]

    2022

  2. [2]

    Discord and decoher- ence

    Jérôme Martin, Amaury Micheli, and Vincent Vennin. Discord and decoher- ence. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2022(04):051, April

    2022

  3. [3]

    Comparing quantum- ness criteria.Europhysics Letters, 142(1):18001, April 2023

    Jérôme Martin, Amaury Micheli, and Vincent Vennin. Comparing quantum- ness criteria.Europhysics Letters, 142(1):18001, April 2023. [Cited in Struc- ture, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 3.5.2-e, 4, 4, and 4.1]

    2023

  4. [4]

    Phonon decay in one-dimensional atomic Bose quasicondensates via Beliaev-Landau damping.Physical Review B, 106(21):214528, December 2022

    Amaury Micheli and Scott Robertson. Phonon decay in one-dimensional atomic Bose quasicondensates via Beliaev-Landau damping.Physical Review B, 106(21):214528, December 2022. [Cited in Structure, 1.2.4-a, 3.1, 3.3.2- d, 3.3.4-a, 3.3.4-b, 3.3.4-c, 3.3.4-c, 3.3.4-c, 3.5, 3.6, 3.5.1-a, 3.5.1-b, 3.5.1-b, 3.5.1-b, 3.5.1-d, 3.5.1-d, 3.5.2-c, 3.5.2-d, 3.5.2-e, 3....

    2022

  5. [5]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford ; New York,

    Steven Weinberg.Cosmology. Oxford University Press, Oxford ; New York,

  6. [6]

    Cosmology

    Daniel Baumann. Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, 1 edition, June

  7. [7]

    Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation.Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pages 844–847, Jan- uary 1915

    Albert Einstein. Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation.Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pages 844–847, Jan- uary 1915. [Cited in 1.1.1]

    1915

  8. [8]

    Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity

    Steven Weinberg. Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity. Wiley, New York, 1972. [Cited in 1.1.1 and 1.1.2-a]

    1972

Show all 215 references
  1. [9]

    [Cited in 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.1, 1, 1.1.1, 1.1, 1.1.2-c, 1.1.2-d, 4, 1.1.3-b, 1.1.3-b, 1.1.3-b, 7, 1.1.4-a, 1.2.2-b, and 1.2.3-d]

  2. [10]

    Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, et al. Planck 2013 re- sults. XVI. Cosmological parameters.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 571:A16, November 2014. [Cited in 1.1 and 1.1.3-c] 317

    2013

  3. [11]

    Planck2018results.VI

    PlanckCollaboration, N.Aghanim, Y.Akrami, etal. Planck2018results.VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641:A6, September

  4. [12]

    A galaxy at a red- shift z = 6.96.Nature, 443(7108):186–188, September 2006

    Masanori Iye, Kazuaki Ota, Nobunari Kashikawa, et al. A galaxy at a red- shift z = 6.96.Nature, 443(7108):186–188, September 2006. [Cited in 1.1.2-b]

    2006

  5. [13]

    A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae

    Edwin Hubble. A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 15(3):168–173, March 1929. [Cited in 1.1.2-b and 1.1.3-c]

    1929

  6. [14]

    D. J. Fixsen. The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background.The Astrophysical Journal, 707(2):916–920, December 2009. [Cited in 1.2, 1.1.3-c, 1.3, and 1.3.1]

    2009

  7. [15]

    Howard Georgi and S. L. Glashow. Unity of All Elementary-Particle Forces. Physical Review Letters, 32(8):438–441, February 1974. [Cited in 1.1.3-b]

    1974

  8. [16]

    Lemaître

    G. Lemaître. Un Univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactiques.An- nales de la Société Scientifique de Bruxelles, 47:49–59, January 1927. [Cited in 1.1.2-b and 1.1.3-c]

    1927

  9. [17]

    R. A. Alpher, H. Bethe, and G. Gamow. The Origin of Chemical Elements. Physical Review, 73(7):803–804, April 1948. [Cited in 1.1.3-b]

    1948

  10. [18]

    R. H. Dicke, P. J. E. Peebles, P. G. Roll, and D. T. Wilkinson. Cosmic Black- Body Radiation. The Astrophysical Journal, 142:414, July 1965. [Cited in 1.1.3-c]

    1965

  11. [19]

    A. A. Penzias and R. W. Wilson. A Measurement of Excess Antenna Tem- peratureat4080Mc/s. The Astrophysical Journal, 142:419, July1965. [Cited in 1.1.3-c]

  12. [20]

    Pre- cision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions.Physics Reports, 754:1–66, September 2018

    Cyril Pitrou, Alain Coc, Jean-Philippe Uzan, and Elisabeth Vangioni. Pre- cision big bang nucleosynthesis with improved Helium-4 predictions.Physics Reports, 754:1–66, September 2018. [Cited in 1.1.3-b and 1.1.3-c]

    2018

  13. [21]

    Riess, Alexei V

    Adam G. Riess, Alexei V. Filippenko, Peter Challis, et al. Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant. The Astronomical Journal, 116(3):1009–1038, September 1998. [Cited in 1.1.3-c] 318

    1998

  14. [22]

    Perlmutter, G

    S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, et al. Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae.The Astrophysical Journal, 517(2):565–586, June 1999. [Cited in 1.1.3-c]

    1999

  15. [23]

    Alan H. Guth. Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. Physical Review D, 23(2):347–356, January 1981. [Cited in 1.1.3-c, 1.1.4-b, 1.2, and 1.2.1-c]

    1981

  16. [24]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints.Physics Reports, 405(5-6):279–390, January 2005

    Gianfranco Bertone, Dan Hooper, and Joseph Silk. Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints.Physics Reports, 405(5-6):279–390, January 2005. [Cited in 1.1.3-c]

    2005

  17. [25]

    Zeldovich and M.Yu

    Ya.B. Zeldovich and M.Yu. Khlopov. On the concentration of relic magnetic monopolesintheuniverse. Physics Letters B,79(3):239–241, November1978. [Cited in 1.1.4-c]

  18. [26]

    Preskill

    John P. Preskill. Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles. Physical Review Letters, 43(19):1365–1368, November 1979. [Cited in 1.1.4-c]

    1979

  19. [27]

    Guth and S

    Alan H. Guth and S. H. H. Tye. Phase Transitions and Magnetic Monopole Production in the Very Early Universe.Physical Review Letters, 44(10):631– 635, March 1980. [Cited in 1.1.4-c]

    1980

  20. [28]

    G. F. Smoot, C. L. Bennett, A. Kogut, et al. Structure in the COBE dif- ferential microwave radiometer first-year maps.The Astrophysical Journal, 396:L1, September 1992. [Cited in 1.1.4-a, 1.3, and 1.3.1]

    1992

  21. [29]

    Hunmoo Jeon and Michael J. Longo. Search for Magnetic Monopoles Trapped in Matter.Physical Review Letters, 75(8):1443–1446, August 1995. [Cited in 1.1.4-c]

    1995

  22. [30]

    Review of Particle Physics

    Particle Data Group, R L Workman, V D Burkert, et al. Review of Particle Physics. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2022(8):083C01, August 2022. [Cited in 1.1.4-c]

    2022

  23. [31]

    Planck Collaboration, R. Adam, P. A. R. Ade, et al.Planck 2015 results: I. Overview of products and scientific results.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594:A1, October 2016. [Cited in 1.3 and 1.2.3]

    2015

  24. [32]

    Einhorn, D

    Martin B. Einhorn, D. L. Stein, and Doug Toussaint. Are grand unified the- ories compatible with standard cosmology?Physical Review D, 21(12):3295– 3298, June 1980. [Cited in 1.1.4-c]

    1980

  25. [33]

    Steinhardt

    Andreas Albrecht and Paul J. Steinhardt. Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking. Physical Review Letters, 48(17):1220–1223, April 1982. [Cited in 1.2 and 1.2.2]

    1982

  26. [34]

    Multi-field inflation and cosmological perturbations.Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics D, 26(01):1740003, January 2017

    Jinn-Ouk Gong. Multi-field inflation and cosmological perturbations.Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics D, 26(01):1740003, January 2017. [Cited in 1.2.2]

    2017

  27. [35]

    Quantentheorie und fünfdimensionale Relativitätstheorie

    Oskar Klein. Quantentheorie und fünfdimensionale Relativitätstheorie. Zeitschrift für Physik, 37(12):895–906, December 1926. [Cited in 1.2.2-a]

    1926

  28. [36]

    A. D. Linde. A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems. Physics Letters B, 108(6):389–393, February 1982. [Cited in 1.2 and 1.2.2] 319

    1982

  29. [37]

    Liddle, Paul Parsons, and John D

    Andrew R. Liddle, Paul Parsons, and John D. Barrow. Formalizing the slow-roll approximation in inflation.Physical Review D, 50(12):7222–7232, December 1994. [Cited in 1.2.2-b]

    1994

  30. [38]

    Starobinsky

    Alexei A. Starobinsky. A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models With- out Singularity. Phys. Lett. B, 91:99–102, 1980. [Cited in 1.2.2-b, 1.2.3, and B.2-a]

    1980

  31. [39]

    Encyclopædia Inflationaris

    Jérôme Martin, Christophe Ringeval, and Vincent Vennin. Encyclopædia Inflationaris. Physics of the Dark Universe, 5–6:75–235, December 2014. [Cited in 1.2.2-b, 10, and 1.2.3-e]

    2014

  32. [40]

    W. Gordon. Der Comptoneffekt nach der Schrödingerschen Theorie. Zeitschrift für Physik, 40(1-2):117–133, January 1926. [Cited in 1.2.2-a]

    1926

  33. [41]

    Lim, Brandon S

    Katy Clough, Eugene A. Lim, Brandon S. DiNunno, et al. Robustness of Inflation to Inhomogeneous Initial Conditions. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2017(09):025–025, September 2017. [Cited in 1.2.2-b]

    2017

  34. [42]

    Katy Clough, Raphael Flauger, and Eugene A. Lim. Robustness of Infla- tion to Large Tensor Perturbations.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2018(05):065–065, May 2018. [Cited in 1.2.2-b]

    2018

  35. [43]

    Aurrekoetxea, Katy Clough, Raphael Flauger, and Eugene A

    Josu C. Aurrekoetxea, Katy Clough, Raphael Flauger, and Eugene A. Lim. The Effects of Potential Shape on Inhomogeneous Inflation. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2020(05):030–030, May 2020. [Cited in 1.2.2-b] 320

    2020

  36. [44]

    East, Matthew Kleban, Andrei Linde, and Leonardo Senatore

    William E. East, Matthew Kleban, Andrei Linde, and Leonardo Senatore. Beginning inflation in an inhomogeneous universe.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2016(09):010–010, September 2016. [Cited in 1.2.2-b]

    2016

  37. [45]

    Steinhardt

    David Garfinkle, Anna Ijjas, and Paul J. Steinhardt. Initial conditions prob- lemincosmologicalinflationrevisited. Physics Letters B,843:138028, August

  38. [46]

    Initial conditions for inflation — A short review

    Robert Brandenberger. Initial conditions for inflation — A short review. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 26(01):1740002, January 2017. [Cited in 1.2.2-b]

    2017

  39. [47]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov. Quantum fluctuations and a nonsin- gular universe. ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu, 33:549–553, May 1981. [Cited in 1.2.3 and 1.2.3-b]

    1981

  40. [48]

    Bloomfield, Patrick Fitzpatrick, Kiriakos Hilbert, and David I

    Jolyon K. Bloomfield, Patrick Fitzpatrick, Kiriakos Hilbert, and David I. Kaiser. A Bumpy Start to a Smooth Ride: Onset of Inflation amid Backre- action from Inhomogeneities.Physical Review D, 100(6):063512, September

  41. [49]

    S.W. Hawking. The development of irregularities in a single bubble infla- tionary universe.Physics Letters B, 115(4):295–297, September 1982. [Cited in 1.2.3]

    1982

  42. [50]

    Starobinsky

    A.A. Starobinsky. Dynamics of phase transition in the new inflationary universe scenario and generation of perturbations.Physics Letters B, 117(3- 4):175–178, November 1982. [Cited in 1.2.3]

    1982

  43. [51]

    Guth and So-Young Pi

    Alan H. Guth and So-Young Pi. Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Uni- verse. Physical Review Letters, 49(15):1110–1113, October 1982. [Cited in 1.2.3]

    1982

  44. [52]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov. Energy of vacuum and the large-scale structure of the universe.Zhurnal Eksperimentalnoi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, 83:475–487, August 1982. [Cited in 1.2.3]

    1982

  45. [53]

    Rubakov, M.V

    V.A. Rubakov, M.V. Sazhin, and A.V. Veryaskin. Graviton creation in the inflationary universe and the grand unification scale. Physics Letters B, 115(3):189–192, September 1982. [Cited in 1.2.3]

    1982

  46. [54]

    R. K. Sachs and A. M. Wolfe. Perturbations of a Cosmological Model and Angular Variations of the Microwave Background.The Astrophysical Jour- nal, 147:73, January 1967. [Cited in 1.2.3, 1.2.3-b, 1.2.3-d, and 4] 321

    1967

  47. [55]

    Brandenberger, and H.A

    V Mukhanov, R. Brandenberger, and H.A. Feldman. Theory of cosmological perturbations. Physics Reports, 215(5-6):203–333, June 1992. [Cited in 1.2.3- a, 1.2.3-a, 1.2.3-b, 1.2.3-b, 1.2.3-b, 1.2.3-b, 9, and 1.2.3-e]

    1992

  48. [56]

    Bardeen, Paul J

    James M. Bardeen, Paul J. Steinhardt, and Michael S. Turner. Spontaneous creationofalmostscale-freedensityperturbationsinaninflationaryuniverse. Physical Review D, 28(4):679–693, August 1983. [Cited in 1.2.3 and 1.2.3-b]

    1983

  49. [57]

    TASI Lectures on Inflation, November 2012

    Daniel Baumann. TASI Lectures on Inflation, November 2012. [Cited in 1.2.3-a and 1.2.3-a]

    2012

  50. [58]

    L. P. Grishchuk. Cosmological rotation of quantum-mechanical origin and anisotropy of the microwave background.Physical Review D, 48(12):5581– 5593, December 1993. [Cited in 1.2.3-a]

    1993

  51. [59]

    James M. Bardeen. Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations. Physical Review D, 22(8):1882–1905, October 1980. [Cited in 1.2.3-b]

    1905

  52. [60]

    Gravitational Waves

    Michele Maggiore. Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmol- ogy. Oxford University Press, March 2018. [Cited in 1.2.3-a and 1.2.3-a]

    2018

  53. [61]

    Jérôme Martin and Dominik J. Schwarz. The influence of cosmological transitions on the evolution of density perturbations. Physical Review D, 57(6):3302–3316, March 1998. [Cited in 1.2.3-b]

    1998

  54. [62]

    Inflationary Cosmological Perturbations of Quantum- Mechanical Origin

    Jerome Martin. Inflationary Cosmological Perturbations of Quantum- Mechanical Origin. In Kowalski-Glikman and Giovanni Amelino-Camelia, editors, Planck Scale Effects in Astrophysics and Cosmology, volume 669, pages 199–244. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2005. [Cited in 1...

    2005

  55. [63]

    L. P. Grishchuk and Jérôme Martin. Best Unbiased Estimates for the Mi- crowave Background Anisotropies.Physical Review D, 56(4):1924–1938, Au- gust 1997. [Cited in 1.2.3-d and 1.2.3-d]

    1924

  56. [64]

    Cosmological Perturbation Theory

    Hideo Kodama and Misao Sasaki. Cosmological Perturbation Theory. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 78:1–166, 1984. [Cited in 1.2.3- b]

    1984

  57. [65]

    T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies. Quantum field theory in de Sitter space: Renormalization by point-splitting. Proceedings of the Royal Soci- ety of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 360(1700):117–134, March 1978. [Cited in 1.2.3-d] 322

    1978

  58. [66]

    BICEP/Keck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, et al. BICEP / Keck XIII:ImprovedConstraintsonPrimordialGravitationalWavesusingPlanck, WMAP,andBICEP/KeckObservationsthroughthe2018ObservingSeason. Physical Review Letters, 127(15):151301, October 2021. [Cited in 1.2.3-e and 4]

    2021

  59. [67]

    Dolgov and A.D

    A.D. Dolgov and A.D. Linde. Baryon asymmetry in the inflationary universe. Physics Letters B, 116(5):329–334, October 1982. [Cited in 1.2.4-a]

    1982

  60. [68]

    Akrami, F

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, et al. Planck 2018 results: IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641:A9, September 2020. [Cited in 1.2.3-d and 1.2.3-e]

    2018

  61. [69]

    Reheating an Inflationary Universe

    AndreasAlbrecht, PaulJ.Steinhardt, MichaelS.Turner, andFrankWilczek. Reheating an Inflationary Universe. Physical Review Letters, 48(20):1437– 1440, May 1982. [Cited in 1.2.4-a]

    1982

  62. [70]

    Amin, Mark P

    Mustafa A. Amin, Mark P. Hertzberg, David I. Kaiser, and Johanna Karouby. Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Re- view. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 24(01):1530003, January

  63. [71]

    A. D. Dolgov and D. P. Kirilova. Production of particles by a variable scalar field. Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, 51:172–177, January 1990. [Cited in 1.2.4-a]

    1990

  64. [72]

    Traschen and Robert H

    Jennie H. Traschen and Robert H. Brandenberger. Particle production dur- ing out-of-equilibrium phase transitions. Physical Review D, 42(8):2491– 2504, October 1990. [Cited in 1.2.4-a]

    1990

  65. [73]

    Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation

    Lev Kofman, Andrei Linde, and Alexei Starobinsky. Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation. Physical Review D, 56(6):3258–3295, September

  66. [74]

    Mathieu’s Equation and Its Generalizations: Overview of Stability Charts and Their Features

    Ivana Kovacic, Richard Rand, and Si Mohamed Sah. Mathieu’s Equation and Its Generalizations: Overview of Stability Charts and Their Features. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 70(2):020802, March 2018. [Cited in 1.2.4-b and 3.3.3-a]

    2018

  67. [75]

    On Gauge Invariance and Vacuum Polarization.Physical Review, 82(5):664–679, June 1951

    Julian Schwinger. On Gauge Invariance and Vacuum Polarization.Physical Review, 82(5):664–679, June 1951. [Cited in 1.2.4-b]

    1951

  68. [76]

    Starobinsky

    Lev Kofman, Andrei Linde, and Alexei A. Starobinsky. Reheating after Inflation. Physical Review Letters, 73(24):3195–3198, December 1994. [Cited in 1.2.4-a]

    1994

  69. [77]

    S. W. Hawking. Particle creation by black holes.Communications In Math- ematical Physics, 43(3):199–220, August 1975. [Cited in 1.2.4-b, 1.3.1, 1.3.1, and 13]

    1975

  70. [78]

    W. G. Unruh. Notes on black-hole evaporation. Physical Review D, 14(4):870–892, August 1976. [Cited in 1.3.1 and 1.3.1]

    1976

  71. [79]

    Abbott, T

    R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, et al. Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3. Physical Review X, 13(1):011048, March 2023. [Cited in 1.3.1]

    2023

  72. [80]

    Ya. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov. The Hypothesis of Cores Retarded dur- ing Expansion and the Hot Cosmological Model.Soviet Astronomy, 10:602, February 1967. [Cited in 13]

    1967

  73. [81]

    S. W. Hawking. Black hole explosions? Nature, 248(5443):30–31, March

  74. [82]

    CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, Vol

    CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs. CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, Vol. 6 (2020): Linac4 design report. page 14MB, September 2020. [Cited in 1.3.1]

    2020

  75. [83]

    OntheEinsteinPodolskyRosenparadox

    J.S.Bell. OntheEinsteinPodolskyRosenparadox. Physics Physique Fizika, 1(3):195–200, November 1964. [Cited in 1.3.1]

    1964

  76. [84]

    W. G. Unruh. Experimental Black-Hole Evaporation? Physical Review Letters, 46(21):1351–1353, May 1981. [Cited in 1.3.1, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, and 1.3.2]

    1981

  77. [85]

    What did we learn from studying acoustic black-holes? International Journal of Modern Physics A, 17(20):2721–2725, August 2002

    Renaud Parentani. What did we learn from studying acoustic black-holes? International Journal of Modern Physics A, 17(20):2721–2725, August 2002. [Cited in 1.3.1 and 1.3.3]

    2002

  78. [86]

    Brandenberger

    Jerome Martin and Robert H. Brandenberger. The Trans-Planckian Problem of Inflationary Cosmology. Physical Review D, 63(12):123501, May 2001. [Cited in 1.3.1]

    2001

  79. [87]

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking. Black Holes in the Early Universe.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 168(2):399–415, August 1974. [Cited in 13]

    1974

  80. [88]

    J. C. Niemeyer and R. Parentani. Trans-Planckian dispersion and scale- invariance of inflationary perturbations.Physical Review D, 64(10):101301, October 2001. [Cited in 1.3.1] 324

    2001

  81. [89]

    Analogue Gravity.Living Reviews in Relativity, 8(1):12, December 2005

    Carlos Barcelo, Stefano Liberati, and Matt Visser. Analogue Gravity.Living Reviews in Relativity, 8(1):12, December 2005. [Cited in 1.3.2, 1.3.2, 1.3.2, 1.3.2, and 1.3.3]

    2005

  82. [90]

    Fedichev and Uwe R

    Petr O. Fedichev and Uwe R. Fischer. Observer dependence for the phonon content of the sound field living on the effective curved space-time back- ground of a Bose-Einstein condensate. Physical Review D, 69(6):064021, March 2004. [Cited in 1.3.2 and 1.3.4-a]

    2004

  83. [91]

    M. J. Jacquet, S. Weinfurtner, and F. König. The next generation of ana- logue gravity experiments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 378(2177):20190239, August 2020. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2020

  84. [92]

    AnaloguegravityandtheHawking effect: Historical perspective and literature review, December 2022

    CarlaR.AlmeidaandMaximeJ.Jacquet. AnaloguegravityandtheHawking effect: Historical perspective and literature review, December 2022. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2022

  85. [93]

    Niemeyer

    Jens C. Niemeyer. Inflation with a Planck-scale frequency cutoff.Physical Review D, 63(12):123502, May 2001. [Cited in 1.3.1]

    2001

  86. [94]

    Brout, S

    R. Brout, S. Massar, R. Parentani, and Ph. Spindel. Hawking radiation without trans-Planckian frequencies. Physical Review D, 52(8):4559–4568, October 1995. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    1995

  87. [95]

    Trans-Planckian redshifts and the substance of the space-time river

    Ted Jacobson. Trans-Planckian redshifts and the substance of the space-time river. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 136:1–17, 1999. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    1999

  88. [96]

    G. E. Volovik. Simulation of Quantum Field Theory and Gravity in Super- fluid He-3. Low Temperature Physics, 24(2):127–129, February 1998. [Cited in 1.3.3 and 1.3.4-a]

    1998

  89. [97]

    relativistic

    N. B. Kopnin and G. E. Volovik. Critical velocity and event horizon in pair- correlated systems with “relativistic” fermionic quasiparticles. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters, 67(2):140–145, January 1998. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    1998

  90. [98]

    EffectivespacetimeandHawkingradiation from a moving domain wall in a thin film of 3He-A.Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters, 68(11):874–880, December 1998

    T.A.JacobsonandG.E.Volovik. EffectivespacetimeandHawkingradiation from a moving domain wall in a thin film of 3He-A.Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters, 68(11):874–880, December 1998. [Cited in 1.3.3] 325

    1998

  91. [99]

    Sonicanalogueofblackholesandtheeffectsofhighfrequencies on black hole evaporation.Physical Review D, 51(6):2827–2838, March 1995

    W.G.Unruh. Sonicanalogueofblackholesandtheeffectsofhighfrequencies on black hole evaporation.Physical Review D, 51(6):2827–2838, March 1995. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    1995

  92. [100]

    Leonhardt and P

    U. Leonhardt and P. Piwnicki. Relativistic Effects of Light in Moving Media withExtremelyLowGroupVelocity. Physical Review Letters, 84(5):822–825, January 2000. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2000

  93. [101]

    Ralf Schützhold and William G. Unruh. Hawking Radiation in an Elec- tromagnetic Waveguide? Physical Review Letters, 95(3):031301, July 2005. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2005

  94. [102]

    Ralf Schützhold and William G. Unruh. Gravity wave analogues of black holes. Physical Review D, 66(4):044019, August 2002. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2002

  95. [103]

    Philbin, Chris Kuklewicz, Scott Robertson, et al

    Thomas G. Philbin, Chris Kuklewicz, Scott Robertson, et al. Fiber-Optical Analog of the Event Horizon. Science, 319(5868):1367–1370, March 2008. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2008

  96. [104]

    Observation of negative-frequency waves in a water tank: A classical analogue to the Hawking effect? New Journal of Physics, 10(5):053015, May 2008

    Germain Rousseaux, Christian Mathis, Philippe Maïssa, et al. Observation of negative-frequency waves in a water tank: A classical analogue to the Hawking effect? New Journal of Physics, 10(5):053015, May 2008. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2008

  97. [105]

    L. J. Garay, J. R. Anglin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller. Sonic Analog of Gravi- tational Black Holes in Bose-Einstein Condensates.Physical Review Letters, 85(22):4643–4647, November 2000. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2000

  98. [106]

    Tedford, Matthew C

    Silke Weinfurtner, Edmund W. Tedford, Matthew C. J. Penrice, et al. Mea- surement of stimulated Hawking emission in an analogue system.Physical Review Letters, 106(2):021302, January 2011. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2011

  99. [107]

    L.-P. Euvé, F. Michel, R. Parentani, et al. Observation of Noise Corre- lated by the Hawking Effect in a Water Tank. Physical Review Letters, 117(12):121301, September 2016. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2016

  100. [108]

    Faccio, S

    D. Faccio, S. Cacciatori, V. Gorini, et al. Analogue gravity and ultrashort laser pulse filamentation.EPL (Europhysics Letters), 89(3):34004, February

  101. [109]

    H. S. Nguyen, D. Gerace, I. Carusotto, et al. Acoustic Black Hole in a Stationary Hydrodynamic Flow of Microcavity Polaritons.Physical Review Letters, 114(3):036402, January 2015. [Cited in 1.3.3] 326

    2015

  102. [110]

    Človečko, E

    M. Človečko, E. Gažo, M. Kupka, and P. Skyba. Magnonic Analog of Black- and White-Hole Horizons in Superfluid He 3 - B.Physical Review Letters, 123(16):161302, October 2019. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2019

  103. [111]

    Observation of Stimulated Hawking Radiation in an Optical Analogue

    Jonathan Drori, Yuval Rosenberg, David Bermudez, et al. Observation of Stimulated Hawking Radiation in an Optical Analogue. Physical Review Letters, 122(1):010404, January 2019. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2019

  104. [112]

    Kolobov, and Jeff Steinhauer

    Juan Ramón Muñoz de Nova, Katrine Golubkov, Victor I. Kolobov, and Jeff Steinhauer. Observation of thermal Hawking radiation and its temperature in an analogue black hole. Nature, 569(7758):688–691, May 2019. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2019

  105. [113]

    Nonlocal density correlations as a signature of Hawking radiation from acoustic black holes

    Roberto Balbinot, Alessandro Fabbri, Serena Fagnocchi, et al. Nonlocal density correlations as a signature of Hawking radiation from acoustic black holes. Physical Review A, 78(2):021603, August 2008. [Cited in 1.3.3]

    2008

  106. [114]

    Donley, Neil R

    Elizabeth A. Donley, Neil R. Claussen, Simon L. Cornish, et al. Dynamics of collapsing and exploding Bose-Einstein condensates.Nature, 412(6844):295– 299, July 2001. [Cited in 1.3.4-a]

    2001

  107. [115]

    BEC Collapse, Particle Production and Squeezing of the Vacuum, June 2003

    Esteban Calzetta and Bei Lok Hu. BEC Collapse, Particle Production and Squeezing of the Vacuum, June 2003. [Cited in 1.3.4-a]

    2003

  108. [116]

    Calzetta and B

    E. Calzetta and B. L. Hu. BEC Collapse and Dynamical Squeezing of Vac- uum Fluctuations. Physical Review A, 68(4):043625, October 2003. [Cited in 1.3.4-a]

    2003

  109. [117]

    Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entan- glement in an analogue black hole.Nature Physics, 12(10):959–965, October

    Jeff Steinhauer. Observation of quantum Hawking radiation and its entan- glement in an analogue black hole.Nature Physics, 12(10):959–965, October

  110. [118]

    AnaloguemodelsforFRW cosmologies

    CarlosBarcelo, StefanoLiberati, andMattVisser. AnaloguemodelsforFRW cosmologies. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 12(09):1641–1649, October 2003. [Cited in 1.3.4-a]

    2003

  111. [119]

    Probing semiclassical analogue gravity in Bose–Einstein condensates with widely tunable interac- tions

    Carlos Barcelo, Stefano Liberati, and Matt Visser. Probing semiclassical analogue gravity in Bose–Einstein condensates with widely tunable interac- tions. Physical Review A, 68(5):053613, November 2003. [Cited in 1.3.4-a and 1.3.4-b]

    2003

  112. [120]

    Cosmological

    Petr O. Fedichev and Uwe R. Fischer. "Cosmological" quasiparticle pro- duction in harmonically trapped superfluid gases. Physical Review A, 69(3):033602, March 2004. [Cited in 1.3.4-a and 1.3.4-b] 327

    2004

  113. [121]

    Fedichev and Uwe R

    Petr O. Fedichev and Uwe R. Fischer. Gibbons-Hawking Effect in the Sonic de Sitter Space-Time of an Expanding Bose-Einstein-Condensed Gas.Phys- ical Review Letters, 91(24):240407, December 2003. [Cited in 1.3.4-a]

    2003

  114. [122]

    Ch Weinfurtner

    Silke E. Ch Weinfurtner. Analog model for an expanding universe.General Relativity and Gravitation, 37(9):1549–1554, September2005. [Citedin1.3.4- a]

  115. [123]

    Aspects of cosmic inflation in expanding Bose–Einstein condensates.New Journal of Physics, 7:248–248, November 2005

    Michael Uhlmann, Yan Xu, and Ralf Schützhold. Aspects of cosmic inflation in expanding Bose–Einstein condensates.New Journal of Physics, 7:248–248, November 2005. [Cited in 1.3.4-a]

    2005

  116. [124]

    E. A. Calzetta and B. L. Hu. Early Universe Quantum Processes in BEC Collapse Experiments. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 44(10):1691–1704, October 2005. [Cited in 1.3.4-a]

    2005

  117. [125]

    Piyush Jain, Silke Weinfurtner, Matt Visser, and C. W. Gardiner. Analogue model of a FRW universe in Bose-Einstein condensates: Application of the classical field method. Physical Review A, 76(3):033616, September 2007. [Cited in 1.3.4-a]

    2007

  118. [126]

    Spontaneous Beliaev-Landau scattering out of equilibrium.Phys- ical Review A, 96(5):053854, November 2017

    Mathias Van Regemortel, Wim Casteels, Iacopo Carusotto, and Michiel Wouters. Spontaneous Beliaev-Landau scattering out of equilibrium.Phys- ical Review A, 96(5):053854, November 2017. [Cited in 1.3.4-a and 3.5.1-a]

    2017

  119. [127]

    Silke Weinfurtner, Piyush Jain, Matt Visser, and C. W. Gardiner. Cosmo- logical particle production in emergent rainbow spacetimes.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 26(6):065012, March 2009. [Cited in 1.3.4-a]

    2009

  120. [128]

    Alsing, Jonathan P

    Paul M. Alsing, Jonathan P. Dowling, and G. J. Milburn. Ion Trap Simula- tions of Quantum Fields in an Expanding Universe.Physical Review Letters, 94(22):220401, June 2005. [Cited in 1.3.4-a]

    2005

  121. [129]

    Analogue of Cosmological Particle Creation in an Ion Trap

    Ralf Schützhold, Michael Uhlmann, Lutz Petersen, et al. Analogue of Cosmological Particle Creation in an Ion Trap. Physical Review Letters, 99(20):201301, November 2007. [Cited in 1.3.4-a]

    2007

  122. [130]

    Jaskula, G

    J.-C. Jaskula, G. B. Partridge, M. Bonneau, et al. Acoustic Analog to the Dynamical Casimir Effect in a Bose-Einstein Condensate.Physical Review Letters, 109(22):220401, November 2012. [Cited in 1.3.4-b, 1.3.4-c, 2.4, 3.1, 3.2, 3.2, 1, 3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.2, 3.3.2-a, 3.3.2-a, 3.3,...

    2012

  123. [131]

    Quantum simulation of cosmic inflation in two-componentBose-Einsteincondensates

    Uwe Fischer and Ralf Schützhold. Quantum simulation of cosmic inflation in two-componentBose-Einsteincondensates. Physical Review A,70(6):063615, December 2004. [Cited in 1.3.4-a]

    2004

  124. [132]

    Quantum entan- glement due to modulated Dynamical Casimir Effect.Physical Review A, 89(6):063606, June 2014

    Xavier Busch, Renaud Parentani, and Scott Robertson. Quantum entan- glement due to modulated Dynamical Casimir Effect.Physical Review A, 89(6):063606, June 2014. [Cited in 1.3.4-b, 1.3.4-c, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3.2-d, 3.3.3-a, 3.3.3-b, 3.3.3-b, 3.3.3-b, 3.3.3-b, 3.3.3-b, 4, 3.6, 3.6.1, and 4]

    2014

  125. [133]

    Nonlinearities in- duced by parametric resonance in effectively 1D atomic Bose condensates

    Scott Robertson, Florent Michel, and Renaud Parentani. Nonlinearities in- duced by parametric resonance in effectively 1D atomic Bose condensates. Physical Review D, 98(5):056003, September 2018. [Cited in 1.3.4-b, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3.2, 3.3.2-a, 3.3.2-a, 3.3.2-b, 3.3.3-b, 3.3.3-c, ...

    2018

  126. [134]

    From Cosmology to Cold Atoms: Observation of Sakharov Oscillations in a Quenched Atomic Superfluid

    Chen-Lung Hung, Victor Gurarie, and Cheng Chin. From Cosmology to Cold Atoms: Observation of Sakharov Oscillations in a Quenched Atomic Superfluid. Science, 341(6151):1213–1215, September 2013. [Cited in 1.3.4-b]

    2013

  127. [135]

    A. D. Sakharov. The Initial Stage of an Expanding Universe and the Appear- ance of a Nonuniform Distribution of Matter.Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 22:241, January 1966. [Cited in 1.3.4-b]

    1966

  128. [136]

    Cosmological Sakharov oscillations and quantum me- chanics of the early Universe

    Leonid P Grishchuk. Cosmological Sakharov oscillations and quantum me- chanics of the early Universe. Physics-Uspekhi, 55(2):210–216, February

  129. [137]

    Observation of Quasiparticle Pair Production and Quantum Entanglement in Atomic Quantum Gases Quenched to an Attractive Interaction

    Cheng-An Chen, Sergei Khlebnikov, and Chen-Lung Hung. Observation of Quasiparticle Pair Production and Quantum Entanglement in Atomic Quantum Gases Quenched to an Attractive Interaction. Physical Review Letters, 127(6):060404, August 2021. [Cited in 1.3.4-b]

    2021

  130. [138]

    Carusotto, R

    I. Carusotto, R. Balbinot, A. Fabbri, and A. Recati. Density correlations and analog dynamical Casimir emission of Bogoliubov phonons in modu- lated atomic Bose-Einstein condensates.The European Physical Journal D, 56(3):391–404, February 2010. [Cited in 1.3.4-b]

    2010

  131. [139]

    Phonon redshift and Hubble friction in an expanding BEC

    Stephen Eckel and Theodore Jacobson. Phonon redshift and Hubble friction in an expanding BEC. SciPost Physics, 10(3):064, March 2021. [Cited in 1.3.4-b]

    2021

  132. [140]

    Banik, M

    S. Banik, M. Gutierrez Galan, H. Sosa-Martinez, et al. Accurate Determina- tion of Hubble Attenuation and Amplification in Expanding and Contract- ing Cold-Atom Universes.Physical Review Letters, 128(9):090401, February

  133. [141]

    Quantum field sim- ulator for dynamics in curved spacetime.arXiv:2202.10399, February 2022

    Celia Viermann, Marius Sparn, Nikolas Liebster, et al. Quantum field sim- ulator for dynamics in curved spacetime.arXiv:2202.10399, February 2022. [Cited in 1.3.4-b and 3.3.2-b]

    2022 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Accelerating Plasma Mirrors to Investi- gate the Black Hole Information Loss Paradox

    Pisin Chen and Gerard Mourou. Accelerating Plasma Mirrors to Investi- gate the Black Hole Information Loss Paradox. Physical Review Letters, 118(4):045001, January 2017. [Cited in 1.3.4-b]

    2017

  135. [143]

    Phonon Pair Creation by Inflating Quantum Fluctuations in an Ion Trap.Physical Review Letters, 123(18):180502, October 2019

    Matthias Wittemer, Frederick Hakelberg, Philip Kiefer, et al. Phonon Pair Creation by Inflating Quantum Fluctuations in an Ion Trap.Physical Review Letters, 123(18):180502, October 2019. [Cited in 1.3.4-b]

    2019

  136. [144]

    Analogue cosmo- logical particle creation in an ultracold quantum fluid of light.Nature Com- munications, 13(1):2890, May 2022

    Jeff Steinhauer, Murad Abuzarli, Tangui Aladjidi, et al. Analogue cosmo- logical particle creation in an ultracold quantum fluid of light.Nature Com- munications, 13(1):2890, May 2022. [Cited in 1.3.4-b]

    2022

  137. [145]

    Eckel, A

    S. Eckel, A. Kumar, T. Jacobson, et al. A Rapidly Expanding Bose- Einstein Condensate: An Expanding Universe in the Lab.Physical Review X, 8(2):021021, April 2018. [Cited in 1.3.4-b and 3.3.3-a]

    2018

  138. [146]

    T. V. Zache, V. Kasper, and J. Berges. Inflationary preheating dynamics with two-species condensates.Physical Review A, 95(6):063629, June 2017. [Cited in 1.3.4-c, 3.3.3-a, and 4]

    2017

  139. [147]

    Geier, Markus K

    Aleksandr Chatrchyan, Kevin T. Geier, Markus K. Oberthaler, et al. Ana- log cosmological reheating in an ultracold Bose gas. Physical Review A, 104(2):023302, August 2021. [Cited in 1.3.4-c]

    2021

  140. [148]

    [Cited in 1.3.4-b] 329

  141. [149]

    Ke Wang, Han Fu, and K. Levin. Simulating Cosmological Evolution by Quantum Quench of an Atomic BEC, April 2023. [Cited in 1.3.4-c]

    2023

  142. [150]

    L. P. Grishchuk and Y. V. Sidorov. Squeezed quantum states of relic gravi- tons and primordial density fluctuations.Physical Review D, 42(10):3413– 3421, November 1990. [Cited in 2.2]

    1990

  143. [151]

    Does inflation squeeze cosmological perturbations?arXiv:2203.07066, March 2022

    Ivan Agullo, Béatrice Bonga, and Patricia Ribes Metidieri. Does inflation squeeze cosmological perturbations?arXiv:2203.07066, March 2022. [Cited in 2.2] 330

    2022 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Decoherence from isocur- vature perturbations in inflation

    Tomislav Prokopec and Gerasimos I Rigopoulos. Decoherence from isocur- vature perturbations in inflation. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2007(11):029–029, November 2007. [Cited in 2.2]

    2007

  145. [153]

    Barroso, August Geelmuyden, Zack Fifer, et al

    Vitor S. Barroso, August Geelmuyden, Zack Fifer, et al. Primary thermali- sation mechanism of Early Universe observed from Faraday-wave scattering on liquid-liquid interfaces. arXiv:2207.02199, July 2022. [Cited in 1.3.4-b, 1.3.4-c, 3.3.3-a, and 4]

    2022 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Quantum discord of cosmic inflation: Can we show that CMB anisotropies are of quantum-mechanical origin? Physical Review D, 93(2):023505, January 2016

    Jérôme Martin and Vincent Vennin. Quantum discord of cosmic inflation: Can we show that CMB anisotropies are of quantum-mechanical origin? Physical Review D, 93(2):023505, January 2016. [Cited in 2.3]

    2016

  147. [155]

    Dynamical Casimir effect in dissi- pative media: When is the final state nonseparable? Physical Review D, 88(4):045023, August 2013

    Xavier Busch and Renaud Parentani. Dynamical Casimir effect in dissi- pative media: When is the final state nonseparable? Physical Review D, 88(4):045023, August 2013. [Cited in 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3.2-d]

    2013

  148. [156]

    Numerical studies of back-reaction effects in an analog model of cosmological pre-heating.arXiv:2207.00311, July 2022

    Salvatore Butera and Iacopo Carusotto. Numerical studies of back-reaction effects in an analog model of cosmological pre-heating.arXiv:2207.00311, July 2022. [Cited in 1.3.4-c and 4]

    2022 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Assessing degrees of entanglement of phonon states in atomic Bose gases through the measure- ment of commuting observables.Physical Review D, 96(4):045012, August

    Scott Robertson, Florent Michel, and Renaud Parentani. Assessing degrees of entanglement of phonon states in atomic Bose gases through the measure- ment of commuting observables.Physical Review D, 96(4):045012, August

  150. [158]

    Gerald T. Moore. Quantum Theory of the Electromagnetic Field in a Variable-Length One-Dimensional Cavity.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 11(9):2679–2691, September 1970. [Cited in 3.2]

    1970

  151. [159]

    Bryce S. DeWitt. Quantum field theory in curved spacetime.Physics Re- ports, 19(6):295–357, August 1975. [Cited in 3.2]

    1975

  152. [160]

    S. A. Fulling and P. C. W. Davies. Radiation from a Moving Mirror in Two Dimensional Space-Time: Conformal Anomaly. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 348(1654):393–414, 1976. [Cited in 3.2]

    1976

  153. [161]

    Dissipative fields in de Sitter and black hole spacetimes: Quantum entanglement due to pair production and dissipation

    Julian Adamek, Xavier Busch, and Renaud Parentani. Dissipative fields in de Sitter and black hole spacetimes: Quantum entanglement due to pair production and dissipation. Physical Review D, 87(12):124039, June 2013. [Cited in 2.2, 2.3, and 4]

    2013

  154. [162]

    C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, A. Pourkabirian, et al. Observation of the dy- namical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit.Nature, 479(7373):376– 379, November 2011. [Cited in 3.2] 331

    2011

  155. [163]

    Pasi Lähteenmäki, G. S. Paraoanu, Juha Hassel, and Pertti J. Hakonen. Dynamical Casimir effect in a Josephson metamaterial.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(11):4234–4238, March 2013. [Cited in 3.2 and 3.2]

    2013

  156. [164]

    Controlling and observing nonseparability of phonons created in time-dependent 1D atomic Bose condensates

    Scott Robertson, Florent Michel, and Renaud Parentani. Controlling and observing nonseparability of phonons created in time-dependent 1D atomic Bose condensates. Physical Review D, 95(6):065020, March 2017. [Cited in 3.1, 3.2, 3.3.2-a, 3.3.2-a, 3.3.2-a, 3.3.2-b, 3.3.2-b, 3.3.3...

    2017

  157. [165]

    Engels, C

    P. Engels, C. Atherton, and M. A. Hoefer. Observation of Faraday Waves in a Bose-Einstein Condensate. Physical Review Letters, 98(9):095301, February

  158. [166]

    L. P. Pitaevski˘ ı and S. Stringari.Bose-Einstein Condensation. Number 116 in Oxford Science Publications. Clarendon Press, Oxford ; New York, 2003. [Cited in 3.3.1, 3.3.1, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.2-c, 3.3.2-c, 3.3.2-c, 3.3.4-a, 3.3.4-c, and 3.3.4-c]

    2003

  159. [167]

    F. D. M. Haldane. Effective Harmonic-Fluid Approach to Low-Energy Properties of One-Dimensional Quantum Fluids. Physical Review Letters, 47(25):1840–1843, December 1981. [Cited in 3.3.1]

    1981

  160. [168]

    Extension of Bogoliubov theory to quasi- condensates

    Christophe Mora and Yvan Castin. Extension of Bogoliubov theory to quasi- condensates. Physical Review A, 67(5):053615, May 2003. [Cited in 3.3.1, 3.3.4-b, 3.3.4-b, 3.3.4-c, 6, 3.5.1-a, and 3.5.1-b]

    2003

  161. [169]

    Madelung

    E. Madelung. Eine anschauliche Deutung der Gleichung von Schrödinger. Die Naturwissenschaften, 14(45):1004–1004, November 1926. [Cited in 3.3.1]

    1926

  162. [170]

    L. Parker. Particle Creation in Expanding Universes.Physical Review Let- ters, 21(8):562–564, August 1968. [Cited in 3.2]

    1968

  163. [171]

    S. Moal, M. Portier, J. Kim, et al. Accurate Determination of the Scattering Length of Metastable Helium Atoms Using Dark Resonances between Atoms and Exotic Molecules.Physical Review Letters, 96(2):023203, January 2006. [Cited in 3.3.2]

    2006

  164. [172]

    Lieb and Werner Liniger

    Elliott H. Lieb and Werner Liniger. Exact Analysis of an Interacting Bose Gas. I. The General Solution and the Ground State. Physical Review, 130(4):1605–1616, May 1963. [Cited in 3.3.2]

    1963

  165. [173]

    Optical analogue of the dynamical Casimir effect in a dispersion-oscillating fibre.Communi- cations Physics, 2(1):84, July 2019

    Stefano Vezzoli, Arnaud Mussot, Niclas Westerberg, et al. Optical analogue of the dynamical Casimir effect in a dispersion-oscillating fibre.Communi- cations Physics, 2(1):84, July 2019. [Cited in 3.2 and 3.2]

    2019

  166. [174]

    Quasi-1D Bose-Einstein condensates in the dimensional crossover regime

    F Gerbier. Quasi-1D Bose-Einstein condensates in the dimensional crossover regime. Europhysics Letters (EPL), 66(6):771–777, June 2004. [Cited in 3.3.2-a]

    2004

  167. [175]

    Kagan, E

    Yu. Kagan, E. L. Surkov, and G. V. Shlyapnikov. Evolution of a Bose- condensed gas under variations of the confining potential.Physical Review A, 54(3):R1753–R1756, September 1996. [Cited in 3.3.2-a]

    1996

  168. [176]

    James E. Lidsey. Cosmic Dynamics of Bose-Einstein Condensates.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 21(4):777–785, February 2004. [Cited in 3.3.2-a]

    2004

  169. [177]

    Leach and S.K

    P.G.L. Leach and S.K. Andriopoulos. The Ermakov equation: A commen- tary. Applicable Analysis and Discrete Mathematics, 2(2):146–157, 2008. [Cited in 3.3.2-a]

    2008

  170. [178]

    On the robustness of entanglement in analogue gravity systems

    D E Bruschi, N Friis, I Fuentes, and S Weinfurtner. On the robustness of entanglement in analogue gravity systems. New Journal of Physics, 15(11):113016, November 2013. [Cited in 3.3.2-d]

    2013

  171. [179]

    D. S. Petrov, D. M. Gangardt, and G. V. Shlyapnikov. Low-dimensional trapped gases. Journal de Physique IV (Proceedings), 116:5–44, October

  172. [180]

    Inflationary spectra and partially de- cohered distributions.Physical Review D, 72(4):045015, August 2005

    David Campo and Renaud Parentani. Inflationary spectra and partially de- cohered distributions.Physical Review D, 72(4):045015, August 2005. [Cited in 3.3.3-b]

    2005

  173. [181]

    Zanchin, A

    V. Zanchin, A. Maia Jr., W. Craig, and R. Brandenberger. Reheating in the Presence of Noise. Physical Review D, 57(8):4651–4662, April 1998. [Cited in 3.3.3-b and 4]

    1998

  174. [182]

    Zanchin, A

    V. Zanchin, A. Maia Jr., W. Craig, and R. Brandenberger. Reheating in the Presence of Inhomogeneous Noise. Physical Review D, 60(2):023505, June

  175. [183]

    Olshanii

    M. Olshanii. Atomic Scattering in the Presence of an External Confinement and a Gas of Impenetrable Bosons.Physical Review Letters, 81(5):938–941, August 1998. [Cited in 3.3.2] 332

    1998

  176. [184]

    On the observation of nonclassical excitations in Bose-Einstein condensates

    Andreas Finke, Piyush Jain, and Silke Weinfurtner. On the observation of nonclassical excitations in Bose-Einstein condensates. New Journal of Physics, 18(11):113017, November 2016. [Cited in 3.3.3-c]

    2016

  177. [185]

    P. C. Hohenberg. Existence of Long-Range Order in One and Two Dimen- sions. Physical Review, 158(2):383–386, June 1967. [Cited in 3.3.4-a] 333

    1967

  178. [186]

    M. J. Steel, M. K. Olsen, L. I. Plimak, et al. Dynamical quantum noise in trapped Bose-Einstein condensates.Physical Review A, 58(6):4824–4835, December 1998. [Cited in 3.5]

    1998

  179. [187]

    The truncated Wigner method for Bose condensed gases: Limits of validity and applications

    Alice Sinatra, Carlos Lobo, and Yvan Castin. The truncated Wigner method for Bose condensed gases: Limits of validity and applications. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 35(17):3599–3631, September 2002. [Cited in 3.5]

    2002

  180. [188]

    Phase space representation of quantum dynamics.An- nals of Physics, 325(8):1790–1852, August 2010

    Anatoli Polkovnikov. Phase space representation of quantum dynamics.An- nals of Physics, 325(8):1790–1852, August 2010. [Cited in 3.5]

    2010

  181. [189]

    Spectrum and entanglement of phonons in quantum fluids of light

    Xavier Busch, Iacopo Carusotto, and Renaud Parentani. Spectrum and entanglement of phonons in quantum fluids of light. Physical Review A, 89(4):043819, April 2014. [Cited in 3.3.3-a]

    2014

  182. [190]

    Ruostekoski and A

    J. Ruostekoski and A. D. Martin. Truncated Wigner method for Bose gases, September 2012. [Cited in 3.5.1-b]

    2012

  183. [191]

    G. P. Agrawal.Nonlinear Fiber Optics. Elsevier/Academic Press, Amster- dam, fifth edition edition, 2013. [Cited in 3.5.2-a]

    2013

  184. [192]

    Decoherence and entropy of pri- mordial fluctuations

    David Campo and Renaud Parentani. Decoherence and entropy of pri- mordial fluctuations. I. Formalism and interpretation.Physical Review D, 78(6):065044, September 2008. [Cited in 3.5.3-b]

    2008

  185. [193]

    Inflationary spectra and violations of Bell inequalities

    David Campo and Renaud Parentani. Inflationary spectra and violations of Bell inequalities. Physical Review D, 74(2):025001, July 2006. [Cited in 4]

    2006

  186. [194]

    DeCross, David I

    Matthew P. DeCross, David I. Kaiser, Anirudh Prabhu, et al. Preheating aftermultifieldinflationwithnonminimalcouplings, II:ResonanceStructure. Physical Review D, 97(2):023527, January 2018. [Cited in 3.3.3-b and 4]

    2018

  187. [195]

    Noise and decoherence in- duced by gravitons.Physical Review D, 103(4):044017, February 2021

    Sugumi Kanno, Jiro Soda, and Junsei Tokuda. Noise and decoherence in- duced by gravitons.Physical Review D, 103(4):044017, February 2021. [Cited in 4]

    2021

  188. [196]

    Signatures of the Quantization of Gravity at Gravitational Wave Detectors.Physical Review D, 104(4):046021, August 2021

    Maulik Parikh, Frank Wilczek, and George Zahariade. Signatures of the Quantization of Gravity at Gravitational Wave Detectors.Physical Review D, 104(4):046021, August 2021. [Cited in 4]

    2021

  189. [197]

    Indirectdetectionofgravitons through quantum entanglement.Physical Review D, 104(8):083516, October

    SugumiKanno, JiroSoda, andJunseiTokuda. Indirectdetectionofgravitons through quantum entanglement.Physical Review D, 104(8):083516, October

  190. [198]

    Figueroa

    Chiara Caprini and Daniel G. Figueroa. Cosmological Backgrounds of Grav- itational Waves. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 35(16):163001, August

  191. [199]

    Real-space entanglement in the Cosmic Microwave Background

    Jerome Martin and Vincent Vennin. Real-space entanglement in the Cosmic Microwave Background. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2021(10):036, October 2021. [Cited in 4]

    2021

  192. [200]

    C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller. Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Marko- vian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics. Springer Series in Synergetics. Springer, Berlin ; New York, 3rd ed edition, 2004. [Cited in 3.5.1-b]

    2004

  193. [201]

    Real-space Bell inequalities in de Sitter.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2022(07):037, July 2022

    Llorenç Espinosa-Portalés and Vincent Vennin. Real-space Bell inequalities in de Sitter.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2022(07):037, July 2022. [Cited in 4]

    2022

  194. [202]

    Daniel Green and Rafael A. Porto. Signals of a Quantum Universe.Physical Review Letters, 124(25):251302, June 2020. [Cited in 4]

    2020

  195. [203]

    Quantum entanglement.Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2):865– 942, June 2009

    Ryszard Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, Michał Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki. Quantum entanglement.Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2):865– 942, June 2009. [Cited in 4]

    2009

  196. [204]

    Sotiriou

    Thomas P. Sotiriou. F(R) Gravity and scalar-tensor theory.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23(17):5117–5128, September 2006. [Cited in B.2-a] 335

    2006

  197. [205]

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, Greg Kaplanek, et al. Minimal decoherence from inflation, November 2022. [Cited in 4 and 4]

    2022

  198. [211]

    Real-space entanglement of quantum fields

    Jerome Martin and Vincent Vennin. Real-space entanglement of quantum fields. Physical Review D, 104(8):085012, October 2021. [Cited in 4]

    2021

  199. [1974]

    [Cited in 1.2.4-b and 1.3.1] 323

  200. [1997]

    [Cited in 1.2.4-a, 1.2.4-b, and 1.2.4-b]

  201. [1999]

    [Cited in 3.3.3-b and 4]

  202. [2004]

    [Cited in 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.2, and 3.5.1-b]

  203. [2008]

    [Cited in 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2-a, 1.1.2-b, 1.1.2-d, and 1.1.3-b]

  204. [2016]

    [Cited in 1.3.3, 3.3.3-c, and 3.3.3-c]

  205. [2017]

    [Cited in 3.1, 3.2, 3.3.2-a, 3.3.3-c, and 3.3.3-c]

  206. [2020]

    [Cited in 1.1, 1.2, 1.1.3-a, and 1.2.3-e]

  207. [2022]

    [Cited in Structure, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 4, 4, and 4.1]

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.