Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 39 references

Electron Beam Characterization via Quantum Coherent Optical Magnetometry

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper demonstrates that an electron beam's magnetic field can be mapped by measuring the polarization rotation of a resonant laser in rubidium vapor, yielding the beam's position, size, and total current.

desk verdict First real demonstration that NMOR can image an electron beam's magnetic field and extract position/current; width reconstruction is the known weak spot, but the core idea is sound and worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.02686 v1 pith:XGDR6XGS submitted 2024-12-03 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

Nicolas DeStefano , Saeed Pegahan , Aneesh Ramaswamy , Seth Aubin , T. Averett , Alexandre Camsonne , Svetlana Malinovskaya , Eugeniy E. Mikhailov
show 3 more authors
Gunn Park Shukui Zhang Irina Novikova
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.atom-ph
keywords electronbeamdiagnosticsnonlinearmagneto-opticalrotationatomicmagnetometryrubidiumvaporpositionmonitorcurrentmeasurementnon-invasiveprofiling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that a beam of electrons, passing through a dilute rubidium vapor, imprints its magnetic field on the spin state of the atoms, which in turn rotates the polarization of a resonant laser beam. By imaging that polarization rotation across the laser cross-section, the authors reconstruct a two-dimensional projection of the beam's magnetic field and from it extract the electron beam's vertical position, its width, and its total current. They validate the approach with a thermionic electron source at 10 to 20 keV and currents between 30 and 110 microamperes, and show the measurement is insensitive to beam energy over this range. The method is non-invasive, since the vapor is too dilute to significantly affect the beam, and it does not rely on synchrotron radiation, laser wires, or beam-intercepting screens.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is nonlinear magneto-optical rotation (NMOR): a linearly polarized laser resonant with the rubidium-85 D2 line prepares a coherent superposition of Zeeman sublevels; a magnetic field shifts these sublevels, changing the refractive index for the two circular polarization components and rotating the linear polarization. The rotation angle accumulated along the laser path is proportional to the line-integrated magnetic field, with a calibration factor measured per pixel using a known uniform field. The reconstruction assumes a Gaussian current density, uses Ampere's law to compute the field, and reduces the line integral to an analytic error-function form, which is fit to the normalized rotation image.

What would settle it

Compare the NMOR-reconstructed transverse current profile against an independent, high-resolution beam profile measurement (for example, a scanning wire scanner or a focused fluorescence image) for a beam that is deliberately made non-Gaussian or elliptical; a systematic disagreement in width or shape would refute the Gaussian-profile reconstruction model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central demonstration is that nonlinear magneto-optical rotation (NMOR) of a probe laser in a warm rubidium vapor acts as a spatially resolving magnetometer for the magnetic field of a passing electron beam. For each camera pixel, the measured rotation angle is divided by a locally calibrated response function and then fitted to an error-function profile derived from Ampere's law for a cylindrically symmetric Gaussian current distribution. The fit yields the beam centroid, the total current (matching the Faraday cup within 36 percent and the emission current within 14 percent), and a full width at half maximum of 1.96 ± 0.13 mm. The measured rotation signal is uniform along the beam direction and reverses sign at the beam center, consistent with the expected circulating magnetic field.

Load-bearing premise

The reconstruction assumes the electron beam's current density is a cylindrically symmetric Gaussian and that the locally calibrated NMOR response measured under a uniform field remains valid for the beam's strongly inhomogeneous field; the paper's own width measurement indicates this assumption is not fully met.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The method can characterize beams of any charged particle species, since detection relies only on the magnetic field, not on the particle's charge sign or energy.
  • Because the signal is insensitive to electron kinetic energy, verified between 10 and 20 keV, the same setup could in principle monitor beams from low-energy sources to GeV-scale accelerators without recalibration.
  • With a low-noise camera and faster beam modulation, the authors project shot-noise-limited current sensitivity near 400 pA/√Hz, several orders of magnitude below the currents tested here.
  • The spatial resolution is ultimately diffraction limited, potentially reaching a few microns, which could enable detailed transverse profile imaging of focused beams.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: because the erf-fit forces a circular Gaussian profile, the method would likely misreport the width and possibly the current of an elliptical or hollow beam; a generalized deconvolution from the measured field projection would be needed to handle such shapes.
  • Editorial extension: the measured width discrepancy (1.96 mm from NMOR versus 0.89 mm from fluorescence) suggests the current model underestimates the true resolving power; a careful account of transverse-field broadening could recover a sharper profile.
  • Editorial extension: the same NMOR imaging could be combined with squeezed light or Rydberg-state interrogation to push sensitivity toward single-particle detection, as the authors mention but do not demonstrate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a proof-of-principle diagnostic for electron beams based on nonlinear magneto-optical rotation (NMOR) in a rubidium vapor cell. A 6-mm probe laser traverses the vapor transversely to a 10-20 keV electron beam; the beam's magnetic field rotates the laser polarization, and CCD imaging captures a 2D map of the rotation angle. By fitting the rotation profile with an error-function model derived from Ampere's law for a Gaussian current density (Eqs. 3-6), the authors extract beam position, width, and total current. They validate the position against electron-induced rubidium fluorescence images, the current against a Faraday cup, and demonstrate insensitivity to beam energy between 10 and 20 keV.

Significance. If the quantitative reconstruction is validated, this would be a genuinely new, non-invasive, energy-insensitive beam diagnostic complementary to laserwire and gas-fluorescence monitors. The paper's strength is its proof-of-principle demonstration with independent cross-checks: Faraday-cup current, fluorescence position, and fluorescence width, plus a transparent noise analysis in the Supplementary Material. The position measurement is convincingly validated (slope 1.16±0.21, encompassing unity), and the energy-insensitivity test is a useful experimental result. However, the beam-size claim is not yet supported: the NMOR-derived FWHM is 1.96±0.13 mm versus 0.89±0.04 mm from fluorescence, a factor-of-2.2 discrepancy. Because both size and current reconstructions depend on the same local-calibration assumption, the quantitative claims require further work.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (5) and the paragraph 'To obtain more quantitative information...'] The reconstruction relies on the local-response approximation phi(y,z)=beta(y,z) integral Bx dx, where beta(y,z) is calibrated under a uniform applied field. This assumes the uniform-field calibration applies pointwise to the strongly inhomogeneous, azimuthal field of the e-beam, with no dependence on the transverse component By and no nonlocal spin-coherence effects. The paper's own comparison, FWHM = 1.96±0.13 mm from NMOR versus 0.89±0.04 mm from fluorescence, shows that this assumption is not met in the present experiment. Consequently, the error-function lineshape of Eq. (6) is not established as the correct model, and both the fitted width and the amplitude-derived current are potentially biased. Since the abstract explicitly claims to determine e-beam size, this issue is load-bearing and must be resolved, either by validating Eq. (5) in inhomogeneous fields (e.g., with controlled field gradients or a full spin-response model) or by substantially revising the size claim.
  2. [Fig. 3(b) and the paragraph 'Similarly, we compare the total e-beam current...'] The regression INMOR = (1.36±0.13) IFC is a systematic multiplicative offset of 36%, not random scatter. The text's phrase 'matching within 36%' understates this systematic nature. The authors should identify the origin of the slope: if it is due to Faraday-cup collection losses, the method measures transported current and the term 'total current' needs qualification; if it is due to the model bias from Eq. (5), the current reconstruction is not yet quantitative without an empirical calibration factor. Either way, the current claim needs a quantitative explanation of this offset.
  3. [Paragraph 'From the fit, we obtain a FWHM...' and Supplementary C] The paper states 'we are unable to independently verify the precise profiles of the electron beam' immediately after reporting the fluorescence-based FWHM of 0.89±0.04 mm. The fluorescence measurement is an independent diagnostic and should be used as a test of the NMOR reconstruction. Please report the shape of the fluorescence profile and justify that it reflects the e-beam current density (ionization probability proportional to local current density), then compare the full profiles, not just the FWHM. This is necessary to support the size claim and to assess whether the Gaussian assumption of Eq. (3) is compatible with both measurements.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (6) derivation] The approximation e^{-L^2/4w^2} << 1 requires specifying L as the cell dimension along the probe (x) direction; with the stated cell dimensions this is likely 10 mm, and the approximation holds, but the geometry should be stated explicitly for clarity.
  2. [Eq. (1)] The gyromagnetic ratio gamma = 5 Hz/nT is introduced without context; please state that it is the ground-state hyperfine gyromagnetic ratio for 85Rb.
  3. [Supplementary Eq. (S1)] The expression for the susceptibility chi± is given without derivation; a brief derivation or a more explicit reference to the standard Maxwell-Bloch treatment would improve transparency.
  4. [Fig. 3(a) caption and text] The phrase 'matches within 16%' is based on a regression slope of 1.16±0.21, whose uncertainty already encompasses unity; the text should report the slope with its uncertainty to avoid overstating the agreement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the beam parameters are extracted by fitting a forward model derived from Ampere's law and NMOR theory, then validated against independent Faraday-cup and fluorescence measurements.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) the NMOR rotation rate dφ/dx = βB (Eq. 1 and Supplementary A) comes from standard Maxwell-Bloch theory; (ii) the per-pixel response β(y,z) is experimentally calibrated by applying a known uniform magnetic field with the e-beam off, so the calibration does not contain e-beam information; (iii) assuming a cylindrically symmetric Gaussian current density (Eq. 3), Ampere's law gives B(x,y) (Eq. 4); (iv) Eq. 5 integrates the local rotation along the probe path, and Eq. 6 is the resulting forward model (an erf profile); (v) fitting the measured normalized rotation to Eq. 6 yields y0, w, and I0. None of these steps defines the target quantity in terms of itself: the fit parameters are compared with independent Faraday-cup current and fluorescence position measurements (within 36% and 16%, respectively), which are external benchmarks rather than inputs to the fit. Self-citations (Refs. 2, 5, 26, 33) support standard NMOR/EIT theory or speculative future improvements; the energy-insensitivity claim citing Ref. 33 is additionally confirmed experimentally in this paper, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The paper candidly flags its main limitation: the NMOR-derived width is 1.96±0.13 mm FWHM versus 0.89±0.04 mm from fluorescence, attributed to signal-to-noise and transverse-field broadening of the NMOR resonance (Ref. 19). This indicates that Eq. 5's local-uniform-field assumption is not fully validated for the inhomogeneous e-beam field, which is a correctness/accuracy risk rather than circularity: the fitted quantities are checked against independent data, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The free parameters are the beam attributes being measured, not ad hoc constants. The main assumptions are the Gaussian beam profile and the transferability of a uniform-field calibration to the inhomogeneous e-beam field, both of which are directly implicated in the observed width discrepancy.

free parameters (3)
  • Beam center y0 = Varied, e.g., -2 to 2 mm; compared to fluorescence within 16%
    Fitted from the error-function model (Eq. 6) to the normalized rotation images; the value depends on the electron beam position being measured.
  • Beam 1/e2 half-width w = FWHM 1.96 ± 0.13 mm from NMOR vs 0.89 ± 0.04 mm from fluorescence
    Fitted from the error-function shape; the discrepancy is acknowledged and attributed to SNR and transverse field effects.
  • Total current I0 = 30-110 µA in tested range; regression slope 1.36 vs Faraday cup
    Fitted from the amplitude of the error-function; compared to Faraday cup (36% overestimate) and emission current (14% difference).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The e-beam current density is cylindrically symmetric and Gaussian (Eq. 3).
    Used to derive the analytic magnetic field and rotation profile; the actual beam profile is not independently measured, and the width discrepancy suggests this may not hold exactly.
  • domain assumption The NMOR signal is a linear, locally calibrated response dφ/dx = β(y,z)B, sensitive only to the longitudinal field component Bx.
    Based on standard NMOR theory in the Faraday configuration; the calibration uses a uniform applied field, which may not faithfully capture the response to the e-beam's inhomogeneous field.
  • domain assumption The cell length is much larger than the beam width, L≫w, so the error-function approximation in Eq. 6 holds.
    Valid for the stated geometry (45 mm cell vs ~1 mm beam), but is an approximation used in the fit.
  • domain assumption The electron beam is collimated and its magnetic field has no z-dependence along the probe propagation.
    Needed for the 2D projection integral in Eq. 5; beam divergence is neglected.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electron Beam Characterization via Quantum Coherent Optical Magnetometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XGDR6XGS

@misc{pith2026241202686,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electron Beam Characterization via Quantum Coherent Optical Magnetometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XGDR6XGS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.02686}
}
read the original abstract

We present a quantum optics-based detection method for determining the position and current of an electron beam. As electrons pass through a dilute vapor of rubidium atoms, their magnetic field perturb the atomic spin's quantum state and causes polarization rotation of a laser resonant with an optical transition of the atoms. By measuring the polarization rotation angle across the laser beam, we recreate a 2D projection of the magnetic field and use it to determine the e-beam position, size and total current. We tested this method for an e-beam with currents ranging from 30 to 110 {\mu}A. Our approach is insensitive to electron kinetic energy, and we confirmed that experimentally between 10 to 20 keV. This technique offers a unique platform for non-invasive characterization of charged particle beams used in accelerators for particle and nuclear physics research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.02686 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) The basic concept of the charged particle beam detection method. A linear polarization of a laser beam (red) is affected by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Measured normalized rotation images [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Comparison between the electron beam center [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bossart , author J

    author author R. Bossart , author J. Bosser , author L. Burnod , author E. d'Amico , author G. Ferioli , author J. Mann , author F. Meot , \ and\ author R. Co \"i sson ,\ title Proton beam profile monitor using synchrotron light , \ in\ 10.1007/978-3-0348-5540-2_60 booktitle 11th International Conference on High-Energy Accelerators: Geneva, Switzerland, J...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-5540-2_60

  2. [2]

    Wang , author D

    author author S. Wang , author D. Rubin , author J. Conway , author M. Palmer , author D. Hartill , author R. Campbell , \ and\ author R. Holtzapple ,\ title title Visible-light beam size monitors using synchrotron radiation at cesr , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.11.097 journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2012.11.097

  3. [3]

    Li , author J

    author author W. Li , author J. Yan , author P. Liu , \ and\ author Y. K. \ Wu ,\ title title Synchrotron radiation interferometry for beam size measurement at low current and in large dynamic range , \ 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.25.080702 journal journal Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams \ volume 25 ,\ pages 080702 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.25.080702

  4. [4]

    Hofmann , author G

    author author T. Hofmann , author G. Boorman , author A. Bosco , author S. Gibson , \ and\ author F. Roncarolo ,\ title title A low-power laserwire profile monitor for h- beams: Design and experimental results , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.06.035 journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectro...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.06.035

  5. [5]

    Corner , author A

    author author L. Corner , author A. Aryshev , author G. Blair , author S. Boogert , author P. Karataev , author K. Kruchinin , author L. Nevay , author N. Terunuma , author J. Urakawa , \ and\ author R. Walczak ,\ title title Laserwire: A high resolution non-invasive beam profiling diagnostic , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2013.10.043 journal journal ...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2013.10.043

  6. [6]

    Anne , author Y

    author author R. Anne , author Y. Georget , author R. Hue , author C. Tribouillard , \ and\ author J. Luc Vignet ,\ title title A noninterceptive heavy ion beam profile monitor based on residual gas ionization , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(93)90918-8 journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spect...

    work page doi:10.1016/0168-9002(93)90918-8

  7. [7]

    Sandberg , author W

    author author H. Sandberg , author W. Bertsche , author D. Bodart , author S. Gibson , author S. Jensen , author S. Levasseur , author K. Satou , author G. Schneider , author J. Storey , \ and\ author R. Veness ,\ title title Commissioning of timepix3 based beam gas ionisation profile monitors for the CERN proton synchrotron. \ 10.18429/JACoW-IBIC2021-TUO...

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-ibic2021-tuoa05

  8. [8]

    Variola , author R

    author author A. Variola , author R. Jung , \ and\ author G. Ferioli ,\ title title Characterization of a nondestructive beam profile monitor using luminescent emission , \ 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.10.122801 journal journal Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams \ volume 10 ,\ pages 122801 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevstab.10.122801

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Salehilashkajani , author H

    author author A. Salehilashkajani , author H. D. \ Zhang , author M. Ady , author N. Chritin , author P. Forck , author J. Glutting , author O. R. \ Jones , author R. Kersevan , author N. Kumar , author T. Lefevre , author T. Marriott-Dodington , author S. Mazzoni , author I. ...

  2. [10]

    Maesaka , author H

    author author H. Maesaka , author H. Ego , author S. Inoue , author S. Matsubara , author T. Ohshima , author T. Shintake , \ and\ author Y. Otake ,\ title title Sub-micron resolution rf cavity beam position monitor system at the sacla xfel facility , \ https://doi.org/10.1016...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Budker \ and\ editor D

    editor D. Budker \ and\ editor D. F. \ Jackson Kimball ,\ eds.,\ 10.1017/CBO9780511846380 title Optical Magnetometry \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ address Cambridge ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  4. [12]

    Weis , author G

    author author A. Weis , author G. Bison , \ and\ author Z. D. \ Gruji \' c ,\ title title Magnetic resonance based atomic magnetometers , \ in\ 10.1007/978-3-319-34070-8 booktitle High Sensitivity Magnetometers. Smart Sensors, Measurement and Instrumentation ,\ Vol. volume 19 ...

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author K. M. C. \ Fu , author G. Z. \ Iwata , author A. Wickenbrock , \ and\ author D. Budker ,\ title title Sensitive magnetometry in challenging environments , \ 10.1116/5.0025186 journal journal AVS Quantum Science \ volume 2 ,\ pages 044702 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  6. [14]

    At 1 GeV, the energy loss is 0.04 eV/m

    note We calculate a Bethe energy loss of 0.1 eV/m at a Rb density of 10^ 12 atoms/cm ^3 for 20 keV electrons. At 1 GeV, the energy loss is 0.04 eV/m. Stop

  7. [15]

    author author M. V. \ Balabas , author T. Karaulanov , author M. P. \ Ledbetter , \ and\ author D. Budker ,\ title title Polarized alkali-metal vapor with minute-long transverse spin-relaxation time , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.070801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 1...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Rosner , author D

    author author M. Rosner , author D. Beck , author P. Fierlinger , author H. Filter , author C. Klau , author F. Kuchler , author P. R \" o ner , author M. Sturm , author D. Wurm , \ and\ author Z. Sun ,\ title title A highly drift-stable atomic magnetometer for fundamental phy...

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author V. G. \ Lucivero , author W. Lee , author N. Dural , \ and\ author M. V. \ Romalis ,\ title title Femtotesla direct magnetic gradiometer using a single multipass cell , \ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.014004 journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 15 ,\ page...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Budker , author W

    author author D. Budker , author W. Gawlik , author D. F. \ Kimball , author S. M. \ Rochester , author V. V. \ Yashchuk , \ and\ author A. Weis ,\ title title Resonant nonlinear magneto-optical effects in atoms , \ 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.1153 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ ...

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author P. M. \ Anisimov , author R. A. \ Akhmedzhanov , author I. V. \ Zelensky , \ and\ author E. A. \ Kuznetsova ,\ title title Influence of transverse magnetic fields and depletion of working levels on the nonlinear resonance faraday effect , \ 10.1134/1.1633944 jour...

    doi

  12. [20]

    Zhou , author E

    author author F. Zhou , author E. Y. \ Zhu , author Y. L. \ Li , author E. W. \ Hagley , \ and\ author L. Deng ,\ 10.48550/ARXIV.1804.08194 title Nanotesla-level, shield-less, field-compensation-free, wave-mixing-enhanced body-temperature atomic magnetometry for biomagnetism ,...

    doi arXiv

  13. [21]

    author author C. J. \ Zhu , author J. Guan , author F. Zhou , author E. Y. \ Zhu , \ and\ author Y. Li ,\ title title Giant magneto-optical rotation effect in rubidium vapor measured with a low-cost detection system , \ 10.1364/OSAC.435754 journal journal OSA Continuum \ volum...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Wolfgramm , author A

    author author F. Wolfgramm , author A. Cer \` e , author F. A. \ Beduini , author A. Predojevi \' c , author M. Koschorreck , \ and\ author M. W. \ Mitchell ,\ title title Squeezed-light optical magnetometry , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.053601 journal journal Physical Review Le...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Horrom , author R

    author author T. Horrom , author R. Singh , author J. P. \ Dowling , \ and\ author E. E. \ Mikhailov ,\ title title Quantum-enhanced magnetometer with low-frequency squeezing , \ 10.1103/PHYSREVA.86.023803/FIGURES/8/MEDIUM journal journal Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular,...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Otterstrom , author R

    author author N. Otterstrom , author R. C. \ Pooser , \ and\ author B. J. \ Lawrie ,\ title title Nonlinear optical magnetometry with accessible in situ optical squeezing , \ 10.1364/OL.39.006533 journal journal Opt. Lett. \ volume 39 ,\ pages 6533--6536 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  17. [25]

    Bai , author X

    author author L. Bai , author X. Wen , author Y. Yang , author L. Zhang , author J. He , author Y. Wang , \ and\ author J. Wang ,\ title title Quantum-enhanced rubidium atomic magnetometer based on faraday rotation via 795 nm stokes operator squeezed light , \ 10.1088/2040-898...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Li \ and\ author I

    author author J. Li \ and\ author I. Novikova ,\ title title Improving sensitivity of an amplitude-modulated magneto-optical atomic magnetometer using squeezed light , \ 10.1364/JOSAB.471677 journal journal J. Opt. Soc. Am. B \ volume 39 ,\ pages 2998--3003 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi

  19. [27]

    Wu , author G

    author author S. Wu , author G. Bao , author J. Guo , author J. Chen , author W. Du , author M. Shi , author P. Yang , author L. Chen , \ and\ author W. Zhang ,\ title title Quantum magnetic gradiometer with entangled twin light beams , \ 10.1126/sciadv.adg1760 journal journal...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Boyer , author C

    author author V. Boyer , author C. F. \ McCormick , author E. Arimondo , \ and\ author P. D. \ Lett ,\ title title Ultraslow propagation of matched pulses by four-wave mixing in an atomic vapor , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.143601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 99 ,\ p...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Thaicharoen , author K

    author author N. Thaicharoen , author K. R. \ Moore , author D. A. \ Anderson , author R. C. \ Powel , author E. Peterson , \ and\ author G. Raithel ,\ title title Electromagnetically induced transparency, absorption, and microwave-field sensing in a rb vapor cell , \ 10.1103/...

    doi

  22. [30]

    author author E. K. \ Dietsche , author A. Larrouy , author S. Haroche , author J. M. \ Raimond , author M. Brune , \ and\ author S. Gleyzes ,\ title title High-sensitivity magnetometry with a single atom in a superposition of two circular rydberg states , \ 10.1038/s41567-018...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Jerkins , author J

    author author M. Jerkins , author J. P. \ Klein , author J. H. \ Majors , author F. Robicheaux , \ and\ author M. G. \ Raizen ,\ title title Using cold atoms to measure neutrino mass , \ 10.1088/1367-2630/12/4/043022 journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 12 ,\ pages 043022 ( y...

    doi

  24. [32]

    Kawasaki ,\ title title Tracking a nonrelativistic charge with an array of rydberg atoms , \ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043178 journal journal Phys

    author author A. Kawasaki ,\ title title Tracking a nonrelativistic charge with an array of rydberg atoms , \ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043178 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 043178 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    Ramaswamy \ and\ author S

    author author A. Ramaswamy \ and\ author S. A. \ Malinovskaya ,\ title Control with eit: High energy charged particle detection , \ in\ 10.1007/978-3-030-93460-6_12 booktitle Progress in Nanoscale and Low-Dimensional Materials and Devices: Properties, Synthesis, Characterizati...

    doi

  26. [34]

    author author A. B. \ Matsko , author I. Novikova , author M. S. \ Zubairy , \ and\ author G. R. \ Welch ,\ title title Nonlinear magneto-optical rotation of elliptically polarized light , \ 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.043805 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 67 ,\ pages 043805 ( ...

    doi

  27. [35]

    author author S. E. \ Harris ,\ title title Electromagnetically induced transparency , \ 10.1063/1.881806 journal journal Physics Today \ volume 50 ,\ pages 36 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

    1997 doi

  28. [36]

    Fleischhauer , author A

    author author M. Fleischhauer , author A. Imamoglu , \ and\ author J. P. \ Marangos ,\ title title Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media , \ 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.633 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 633--673 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    doi

  29. [37]

    Finkelstein , author S

    author author R. Finkelstein , author S. Bali , author O. Firstenberg , \ and\ author I. Novikova ,\ title title A practical guide to electromagnetically induced transparency in atomic vapor , \ http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/acbc40 journal journal New Jou...

    doi

  30. [38]

    Grangier , author R

    author author P. Grangier , author R. E. \ Slusher , author B. Yurke , \ and\ author A. LaPorta ,\ title title Squeezed-light--enhanced polarization interferometer , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2153 journal journal prl \ volume 59 ,\ pages 2153--2156 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    doi

  31. [39]

    author author K. F. \ Reim , author P. Michelberger , author K. C. \ Lee , author J. Nunn , author N. K. \ Langford , \ and\ author I. A. \ Walmsley ,\ title title Single-photon-level quantum memory at room temperature , \ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.053603 journal journal Phys. R...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.