Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The anti-de Sitter supergeometry revisited

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read N-extended AdS superspace is conformally flat, with two explicit frames

desk verdict A solid, incremental superspace geometry paper: the explicit conformally flat frames for AdS^{4|4N} are plausible and fill a real gap, but the central Section 3 computation is asserted rather than shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03172 v3 pith:YQO6CQW7 submitted 2024-12-04 hep-th gr-qcmath-phmath.MP

Nowar E. Koning , Sergei M. Kuzenko , Emmanouil S. N. Raptakis This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcmath-phmath.MP PACS 04.65.+e
keywords AdSsuperspaceconformalflatnesssuper-WeyltransformationN-extendedsupersymmetrysuperparticlekappa-symmetrysuperconformalhigher-spinmultiplets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the $\mathcal{N}$-extended anti-de Sitter superspace $\text{AdS}^{4|4\mathcal{N}}$ in four dimensions is conformally flat for every $\mathcal{N}$: its covariant derivatives can be obtained from flat Minkowski superspace by a local super-Weyl transformation. It supplies two explicit realisations of this fact, one in stereographic coordinates with $e^{\sigma} = 1 - \frac{1}{4\mathcal{N}}s_{ij}\bar{s}^{ij}x_+^2 + s_{ij}\theta^{ij}$ and one in Poincaré coordinates with $e^{\sigma} = |s|z_L + s_{ij}\theta^{ij}$. Along the way it reconciles the supergravity-inspired description of AdS superspace, whose structure group is $\text{SL}(2,\mathbb{C}) \times \text{U}(\mathcal{N})$, with the group-theoretic coset description $\text{OSp}(\mathcal{N}|4;\mathbb{R})/[\text{SL}(2,\mathbb{C}) \times \text{O}(\mathcal{N})]$: a covariantly constant tensor $S_{ij}$ can be rotated to $\delta_{ij}S$, reducing the R-symmetry from $\text{U}(\mathcal{N})$ to $\text{O}(\mathcal{N})$. A reader should care because conformal flatness turns problems on this curved superspace into flat-superspace calculations, and the paper uses it to build superparticle models, superconformal higher-spin multiplets, and an action for the $\mathcal{N}=2$ super-Weyl anomaly.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the $\mathcal{N}$-extended conformal superspace with flat connection [30], together with the two-step degauging that reduces its structure group first from the superconformal group to $\text{SL}(2,\mathbb{C}) \times \text{U}(\mathcal{N})_R$ and then, using a nowhere-vanishing chiral compensator $\Xi$ with non-zero $\text{U}(1)_R$ charge, to $\text{SL}(2,\mathbb{C}) \times \text{SU}(\mathcal{N})_R$. In the resulting frame the super-Weyl transformations of the covariant derivatives are generated by a chiral superfield $\sigma$, as in (2.39). The paper identifies the covariantly constant complex symmetric tensor $S_{ij}$ as the object that carries the AdS data: its algebraic constraint $S_i{}^k\bar{S}_{jk} = |S|^2\delta_i{}^j$ follows from covariance, it can be diagonalised by a $\text{U}(\mathcal{N})$ rotation to $\delta_{ij}S$, and its stabiliser is exactly the $\text{O}(\mathcal{N})$ of the coset description. The explicit conformally flat realisations then come from solving the constraints (3.13b) and (3.13c) for $\sigma$, with the ansatz at most quadratic in $\theta$.

What would settle it

Find a solution of the constraints (3.13b) and (3.13c) for sigma in the N=4 case that contains a fourth-order term in the Grassmann variables; the paper claims the most general invariant solution is at most quadratic in theta, so any quartic solution would disprove the classification underlying the two explicit frames.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that for every $\mathcal{N}$ the $\mathcal{N}$-extended AdS superspace can be written in the conformally flat form (1.3), in which the curved covariant derivatives $D_A$ are obtained from flat derivatives $\mathcal{D}_A$ by a finite super-Weyl transformation with chiral parameter $\sigma$. The constraints that single out AdS geometry reduce to equations (3.13b) and (3.13c), whose general Lorentz- and $\text{SU}(\mathcal{N})$-invariant solution is at most quadratic in the Grassmann coordinates; the paper gives the two explicit solutions (3.18) and (3.29). It also shows that the two previously separate frameworks are related: the covariantly constant symmetric tensor $S_{ij}$ obeys $S_i{}^k \bar{S}_{jk} = |S|^2\delta_i{}^j$, and a local $\text{U}(\mathcal{N})$ rotation brings it to $\delta_{ij}S$, which lowers the R-symmetry group from $\text{U}(\mathcal{N})$ to $\text{O}(\mathcal{N})$ and reproduces the coset algebra. A complementary result is that the vielbein obtained from the direct coset construction with $\text{O}(\mathcal{N})$ structure group is not conformally flat for $\mathcal{N}\ge 2$; only the $\text{SU}(\mathcal{N})$ supergravity frame is.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction rests on the ability to choose a nowhere-vanishing chiral compensator that gauges away the U(1)_R connection of the intermediate U(N) superspace; if no such compensator exists, the super-Weyl transformations and the explicit conformally flat frames for $AdS^{{4|4N}}$ do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Conformally flat frames for $\text{AdS}^{4|4\mathcal{N}}$ let any field theory on this background be rewritten with flat-superspace derivatives, with the background geometry encoded in the chiral factor $e^{\sigma}$ and the tensor $S_{ij}$.
  • The two frameworks for AdS superspace are gauge-equivalent once $S_{ij}$ is rotated to $\delta_{ij}S$, so results proved in the $\text{U}(\mathcal{N})$-based supergravity setting transfer to the $\text{O}(\mathcal{N})$-based coset setting.
  • The massless AdS superparticle in a conformally flat frame is classically equivalent to the flat Minkowski superparticle by an einbein rescaling, and it inherits $\kappa$-symmetry in the deformed form (4.16).
  • The two-parameter deformation of the AdS interval (4.4) defines a family of superparticle models whose bi-supertwistor representation matches the coset-frame action at leading order with $\beta = \omega/(4|S|^2)$.
  • In the conformally flat frame the $\mathcal{N}=2$ chiral projection operator becomes $e^{2\sigma}\bar{D}^4$, and the nonlocal effective action generating the super-Weyl anomaly reduces to the local functional $-2a\int d^4x\,d^4\theta\,d^4\bar{\theta}\,\bar{\sigma}\sigma$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension, not pursued in the paper, would be to build a global atlas of conformally flat charts on $\text{AdS}^{4|4\mathcal{N}}$ and to identify the coordinate singularities of the super-Weyl factor; the stereographic and Poincaré realisations are local frames, so on a manifold of nontrivial topology the two charts may have different domains.
  • Because the Poincaré-coordinate frame has an explicit $z_L$ dependence, it may be a convenient starting point for studying boundary limits of superconformal multiplets along AdS/CFT lines, an application the paper does not develop.
  • The same degauging and super-Weyl technology could in principle be adapted to the three-dimensional $(p,q)$ AdS superspaces or to five-dimensional AdS superspace, where the paper only compares structures rather than giving conformally flat frames; testing whether the analogous constraints yield quadratic-in-$\theta$ solutions would be a direct check of how generic the mechanism is.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper revisits the geometry of N-extended AdS superspace AdS^{4|4N} in four dimensions. It reviews the conformal superspace approach of Koning-Kuzenko-Raptakis and the degauging to U(N) and SU(N) superspaces, then proposes two explicit conformally flat frames: a stereographic one with super-Weyl parameter e^σ = 1 - (1/(4N))s_{ij}\bar{s}^{ij}x_+^2 + s_{ij}θ^{ij} and a Poincaré one with e^σ = |s|z_L + s_{ij}θ^{ij}. The paper also explains how the U(N)-based supergravity framework and the OSp(N|4;R)/(SL(2,C)×O(N)) coset framework are related through the covariantly constant tensor S_{ij}, shows that the coset vielbein is not conformally flat for N≥2, and discusses applications to superparticles, superconformal higher-spin multiplets, and the N=2 super-Weyl anomaly.

Significance. If correct, the central result provides, for the first time, explicit conformally flat realisations of AdS^{4|4N} for arbitrary N, unifying the supergravity and group-theoretic descriptions. The paper is careful in distinguishing local conformal flatness from global issues and provides a self-contained review of the conformal superspace machinery. The coset analysis in Appendix B is a useful negative result. However, the verification of the claimed solutions to the AdS constraints is incomplete; this must be supplied before the central claim can be fully accepted. The applications advertised in the abstract are plausible but are treated rather briefly.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, eqs. (3.14)–(3.18)] The reduction of the general ansatz (3.14) to the quadratic expression (3.15) is stated without proof. For N≥3, e^σ can contain θ^4, θ^6, ... terms built from SU(N) singlets (e.g., for N=4, θ^{ij}θ^{kl} with a suitable contraction), and the constraints (3.13b) and (3.13c) are differential equations in these variables. It is not shown that all such higher-order terms are forced to vanish, nor that the constant coefficients satisfy exactly (3.16). Since the explicit conformally flat frame (3.18) and the torsion formula (3.19) are the load-bearing results of the paper, this computation cannot be omitted. The authors should either present the derivation in an appendix or cite a complete published computation.
  2. [§3.2, after eq. (3.13)] The sentence 'If the constraints (3.13b) and (3.13c) are satisfied, the tensor S_{ij} defined by (3.13a) proves to be covariantly constant' is an assertion with no supporting argument. This is a non-trivial statement: one must show that D_A S_{jk}=0 follows from (3.13b,c) together with the algebra (3.2) or (1.3). Without it, the constraints do not clearly single out the AdS geometry. Please provide the proof or a precise reference.
  3. [§3.3, eqs. (3.28)–(3.29)] The Poincaré-patch solution is introduced with the words 'It is an instructive exercise to check' and 'The most general solution to the constraints proves to be at most quadratic in θ's.' For a central claim, this is insufficient. The same omitted computation as in §3.2 is needed here: the substitution of the ansatz (3.28) into (3.13b,c) and the demonstration that all higher θ terms vanish and that (3.29) is indeed the unique solution up to the stated tensors.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, eq. (3.16a)] The notation '\bar{s}_{ij} = s_{ij}' is ambiguous; if s_{ij} is a complex tensor, as used in (3.18) and (3.20), this condition would make it real, which is not generally intended. Please clarify whether this is a typo or whether the reality condition is actually part of the solution.
  2. [§4.3, around eq. (4.12)] The claim that actions (4.7) and (4.9) coincide to leading order in the north chart for β = ω/(4|S|^2) is made without demonstration. A brief derivation or explicit statement of the matching of terms would improve the paper.
  3. [§3.3, eq. (3.29)] The phrase 'instructive exercise' is inappropriate for a result that is essential to the main claim; the computation should be included or referenced.
  4. [§4.3, eq. (4.8)] The expression for \dot{E}^A η_{AB} \dot{E}^B contains a term proportional to \dot{Π}^2 inside the parentheses; the index structure and the evaluation along the trajectory would benefit from being spelled out more explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the explicit AdS^{4|4N} realisations are obtained by solving stated constraints, not by fitting or by self-referential definition.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that AdS^{4|4N} admits explicit conformally flat frames (3.18) and (3.29). The derivation chain is: conformal superspace with flat connection [30] -> degauging to U(N) and SU(N) superspace [2] -> AdS conditions (torsion and curvature Lorentz invariant and covariantly constant) -> differential constraints (3.13b,c) on the super-Weyl parameter -> explicit solutions (3.18) and (3.29). The solution step is a direct calculation from the stated constraints; no parameter is fitted to data and no 'prediction' is used to set a free constant. The constants a, b and s_ij are fixed by (3.15)-(3.17) from the constraints, and the Poincaré realisation (3.29) is checked against the same constraints. The framework from [2] is prior published work with stated assumptions and does not contain the target result; the paper explicitly credits [16] for prior construction of (3.18) in an alternative approach, and its novel contribution is the spinor supervielbein and Poincaré frame. Self-citations to [2] and [30] are load-bearing as a formalism, but they are not unverified assertions of the present paper's conclusion, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives. The acknowledged omission is the detailed algebra showing (3.14)->(3.15) and (3.28)->(3.29); that is an omitted computation, not circularity, and would be a correctness or completeness concern at most.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The free parameters listed are integration constants or model deformation parameters, not fitted to empirical data. The principal load-bearing axioms are the conformal superspace framework from [2] and the standard coset construction.

free parameters (2)
  • s_{ij} = constant symmetric complex tensor
    Integration constant in the conformally flat solutions (3.18) and (3.29); determines the AdS scale via N|S|^2 = s_{ij}\bar{s}^{ij}. Not fitted to data.
  • omega = dimensionless complex parameter
    Introduced in Section 4.3 to define a two-parameter deformation of the AdS supermetric (4.4). It is a new model parameter, not an empirical fit.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The superconformal algebra su(2,2|N) as spelled out in Appendix A.
    Background algebraic conventions used throughout the paper.
  • domain assumption The conformal superspace with flat connection of [30] and its degauging to U(N) and SU(N) superspaces as developed in [2].
    The entire derivation of the conformally flat frames builds on this framework; if the degauging is not valid, the explicit realisations fail.
  • domain assumption The coset construction of AdS^{4|4N} as OSp(N|4;R)/(SL(2,C)xO(N)).
    Standard group-theoretic description of AdS superspace, used as the reference for the O(N) structure group.
  • domain assumption The constraints (3.13b) and (3.13c) characterize AdS superspace in the conformally flat frame.
    Taken from the authors' previous paper [2]; the paper does not re-derive the necessity and sufficiency of these constraints.
  • standard math Zumino's lemma: a complex symmetric matrix S with S^\dagger S = 1 can be written as S = U U^T with U unitary.
    Used in Section 3.1 to reduce S_{ij} to a standard form; cited to [54].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The anti-de Sitter supergeometry revisited." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YQO6CQW7

@misc{pith2026241203172,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The anti-de Sitter supergeometry revisited},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YQO6CQW7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03172}
}
abstract

In a supergravity framework, the $\cal N$-extended anti-de Sitter (AdS) superspace in four spacetime dimensions, $\text{AdS}^{4|4\cal N} $, is a maximally symmetric background that is described by a curved superspace geometry with structure group $\mathsf{SL}(2, \mathbb{C}) \times \mathsf{U}({\cal N})$. On the other hand, within the group-theoretic setting, $\text{AdS}^{4|4{\cal N}} $ is realised as the coset superspace $\mathsf{OSp}({\cal N}|4;\mathbb{R}) /\big[ \mathsf{SL}(2, \mathbb{C}) \times \mathsf{O}({\cal N}) \big]$, with its structure group being $\mathsf{SL}(2, \mathbb{C}) \times \mathsf{O}({\cal N})$. Here we explain how the two frameworks are related. We give two explicit realisations of $\text{AdS}^{4|4{\cal N}} $ as a conformally flat superspace, thus extending the ${\cal N}=1$ and ${\cal N}=2$ results available in the literature. As applications, we describe: (i) a two-parameter deformation of the $\text{AdS}^{4|4{\cal N}} $ interval and the corresponding superparticle model; (ii) some implications of conformal flatness for superconformal higher-spin multiplets and an effective action generating the $\mathcal{N}=2$ super-Weyl anomaly; and (iii) $\kappa$-symmetry of the massless AdS superparticle.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nonlinear self-duality for arbitrary spin, superspin, and supersymmetry type

    hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Every U(1) duality-invariant (super)conformal gauge theory of arbitrary (super)spin obeys a universal self-duality equation, is Legendre self-dual, and (for spin > 1) lives only on conformally flat backgrounds.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [16]

    On the superconformal flatness of AdS superspaces,

    I. A. Bandos, E. Ivanov, J. Lukierski and D. Sorokin, “On the superconformal flatness of AdS superspaces,” JHEP 06, 040 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0205104 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2002

  2. [1]

    Supertwistor re alisations of AdS superspaces,

    S. M. Kuzenko and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Supertwistor re alisations of AdS superspaces,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no.2, 146 (2022) [arXiv:2108.03907 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [2]

    Embedding fo rmalism for N -extended AdS superspace in four dimensions,

    N. E. Koning, S. M. Kuzenko and E. S. N. Raptakis, “Embedding fo rmalism for N -extended AdS superspace in four dimensions,” JHEP 11 (2023), 063 [arXiv:2308.04135 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2023

  4. [3]

    Embedding formalism for (p, q) Ad S superspaces in three dimensions,

    S. M. Kuzenko and K. Turner, “Embedding formalism for (p, q) Ad S superspaces in three dimensions,” JHEP 06, 142 (2023) [arXiv:2303.03082 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [4]

    Embedding formalism for AdS sup erspaces in five dimensions,

    N. E. Koning and S. M. Kuzenko, “Embedding formalism for AdS sup erspaces in five dimensions,” [arXiv:2406.10875 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  6. [5]

    Superbranes and superembeddings,

    D. P. Sorokin, “Superbranes and superembeddings,” Phys. Rep t. 329, 1 (2000) [hep-th/9906142]

    arXiv 2000

  7. [6]

    Superembedding approach to s uperstrings and super-p-branes,

    I. A. Bandos and D. P. Sorokin, “Superembedding approach to s uperstrings and super-p-branes,” in: Handbook of Quantum Gravity , C. Bambi, L. Modesto, I. Shapiro, I. (Eds.) Springer, Singapore ( 2023), [arXiv:2301.10668 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [7]

    V. G. Kac, ”Classification of simple Lie superalgebras,” Functional Anal. Appl. 9, 263 (1975)

    work page 1975

Show all 77 references
  1. [8]

    Simple supersymmetries,

    P. G. O. Freund and I. Kaplansky, “Simple supersymmetries,” J. M ath. Phys. 17, 228 (1976)

    1976

  2. [9]

    The classification of graded Lie Algebras,

    W. Nahm, V. Rittenberg and M. Scheunert, “The classification of graded Lie Algebras,” Phys. Lett. B 61, 383 (1976)

    1976

  3. [10]

    Classification of all simple graded Lie algebras whose Lie algebra is reductive. 1.,

    M. Scheunert, W. Nahm and V. Rittenberg, “Classification of all simple graded Lie algebras whose Lie algebra is reductive. 1.,” J. Math. Phys. 17, 1626 (1976); “Classification of all simple graded Lie algebras whose Lie algebra is reductive. 2. Construction of the exceptional al...

    1976

  4. [11]

    Graded Lie algebra s: Generalization of Hermitian represen- tations,

    M. Scheunert, W. Nahm and V. Rittenberg, “Graded Lie algebra s: Generalization of Hermitian represen- tations,” J. Math. Phys. 18, 146 (1977)

    1977

  5. [12]

    Elementary construction o f graded Lie groups,

    V. Rittenberg and M. Scheunert, “Elementary construction o f graded Lie groups,” J. Math. Phys. 19, 709 (1978)

    1978

  6. [13]

    An alternative class of supersymmetries,

    B. W. Keck, “An alternative class of supersymmetries,” J. Phys . A 8, 1819 (1975)

    1975

  7. [14]

    Nonlinear realization of supersymmetry in de Sitter s pace,

    B. Zumino, “Nonlinear realization of supersymmetry in de Sitter s pace,” Nucl. Phys. B 127, 189 (1977)

    1977

  8. [15]

    Superfield formulation of OSp(1,4 ) supersymmetry,

    E. A. Ivanov and A. S. Sorin, “Superfield formulation of OSp(1,4 ) supersymmetry,” J. Phys. A 13 (1980) 1159

    1980

  9. [17]

    Superparticle m odels with tensorial central charges,

    I. A. Bandos, J. Lukierski and D. P. Sorokin, “Superparticle m odels with tensorial central charges,” Phys. Rev. D 61, 045002 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9904109 [hep-th]]

    2000 arXiv

  10. [18]

    OSp supergroup manifolds, superparticles and supertwistors,

    I. A. Bandos, J. Lukierski, C. Preitschopf and D. P. Sorokin, “ OSp supergroup manifolds, superparticles and supertwistors,” Phys. Rev. D 61, 065009 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9907113 [hep-th]]. 31

    2000 arXiv

  11. [19]

    A polynomial action for a massive, self-interacting ch iral superfield coupled to supergravity,

    W. Siegel, “A polynomial action for a massive, self-interacting ch iral superfield coupled to supergravity,” Harvard preprint HUTP-77/A077 (Dec., 1977)

    1977

  12. [20]

    Superfield Lagrangian for supergravit y,

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Superfield Lagrangian for supergravit y,” Phys. Lett. B 74, 51 (1978)

    1978

  13. [21]

    Minimal auxiliary fields for supergrav ity,

    K. S. Stelle and P. C. West, “Minimal auxiliary fields for supergrav ity,” Phys. Lett. B 74, 330 (1978)

    1978

  14. [22]

    The auxiliary fields of sup ergravity,

    S. Ferrara and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “The auxiliary fields of sup ergravity,” Phys. Lett. B 74, 333 (1978)

    1978

  15. [23]

    Cosmological constant in supergravity,

    P. K. Townsend, “Cosmological constant in supergravity,” Phy s. Rev. D 15, 2802 (1977); M. Kaku and P. K. Townsend, “Poincar´ e supergravity as broken superconformal gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 76, 54 (1978)

    1977

  16. [24]

    S. J. Gates, Jr., M. T. Grisaru, M. Roˇ cek and W. Siegel, Superspace, or One Thousand and One Lessons in Supersymmetry , Front. Phys. 58, 1 (1983) [arXiv:hep-th/0108200]

    1983 arXiv

  17. [25]

    I. L. Buchbinder and S. M. Kuzenko, Ideas and Methods of Supersymmetry and Supergravity or a Wal k Through Superspace, IOP, Bristol, 1995 (Revised Edition: 1998)

    1995

  18. [26]

    A dual formulation of supergra vity-matter theories,

    D. Butter and S. M. Kuzenko, “A dual formulation of supergra vity-matter theories,” Nucl. Phys. B 854, 1 (2012) [arXiv:1106.3038 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  19. [27]

    4D N=2 supergravity and projective superspace,

    S. M. Kuzenko, U. Lindstr¨ om, M. Roˇ cek and G. Tartaglino-Ma zzucchelli, “4D N=2 supergravity and projective superspace,” JHEP 0809, 051 (2008) [arXiv:0805.4683]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [29]

    N=2 AdS supergravity and supe rcurrents,

    D. Butter and S. M. Kuzenko, “N=2 AdS supergravity and supe rcurrents,” JHEP 07, 081 (2011) [arXiv:1104.2153 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Extended superconfor mal higher-spin gauge theories in four di- mensions,

    S. M. Kuzenko and E. S. N. Raptakis, “Extended superconfor mal higher-spin gauge theories in four di- mensions,” JHEP 12, 210 (2021) [arXiv:2104.10416 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [31]

    N=1 conformal superspace in four dimensions,

    D. Butter, “N=1 conformal superspace in four dimensions,” An nals Phys. 325, 1026 (2010) [arXiv:0906.4399 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  23. [32]

    N=2 conformal superspace in four dimensions,

    D. Butter, “N=2 conformal superspace in four dimensions,” JH EP 10, 030 (2011) [arXiv:1103.5914 [hep- th]]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [33]

    N = 3 conformal superspace in four dimensions,

    S. M. Kuzenko and E. S. N. Raptakis, “ N = 3 conformal superspace in four dimensions,” JHEP 03, 026 (2024) [arXiv:2312.07242 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [34]

    N = 4 conformal supergravity: the complete actions,

    D. Butter, F. Ciceri and B. Sahoo, “ N = 4 conformal supergravity: the complete actions,” JHEP 01, 029 (2020) [arXiv:1910.11874 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Superspace approaches to N = 1 supergravity,

    S. M. Kuzenko, E. S. N. Raptakis and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucche lli, “Superspace approaches to N = 1 supergravity,” in: Handbook of Quantum Gravity , C. Bambi, L. Modesto, I. Shapiro, I. (Eds.) Springer, Singapore (2024), [arXiv:2210.17088 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Covariant Superspace Approaches to N = 2 Supergravity,

    S. M. Kuzenko, E. S. N. Raptakis and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucche lli, “Covariant Superspace Approaches to N = 2 Supergravity,” in: Handbook of Quantum Gravity , C. Bambi, L. Modesto, I. Shapiro, I. (Eds.) Springer, Singapore (2024), [arXiv:2211.11162 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [37]

    D. Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen, Supergravity, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press (2012) 607 p. 32

    2012

  29. [38]

    Conformal (p, q) super geometries in two dimensions,

    S. M. Kuzenko and E. S. N. Raptakis, “Conformal (p, q) super geometries in two dimensions,” JHEP 02, 166 (2023) [arXiv:2211.16169 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Conformal supergravity in three dimensions: New off-shell formulation,

    D. Butter, S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak and G. Tartaglino-Mazzuc chelli, “Conformal supergravity in three dimensions: New off-shell formulation,” JHEP 09, 072 (2013) [arXiv:1305.3132 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Conformal supergravity in three dimensions: Off-shell actions,

    D. Butter, S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak and G. Tartaglino-Mazzuc chelli, “Conformal supergravity in three dimensions: Off-shell actions,” JHEP 10, 073 (2013) [arXiv:1306.1205 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  32. [41]

    N=6 s uperconformal gravity in three dimensions from superspace,

    S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “N=6 s uperconformal gravity in three dimensions from superspace,” JHEP 01, 121 (2014) [arXiv:1308.5552 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Conformal supergravity in five dimensions: New approach and applications,

    D. Butter, S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak and G. Tartaglino-Mazzuc chelli, “Conformal supergravity in five dimensions: New approach and applications,” JHEP 1502, 111 (2015). [arXiv:1410.8682 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Invarian ts for minimal conformal supergravity in six dimensions,

    D. Butter, S. M. Kuzenko, J. Novak and S. Theisen, “Invarian ts for minimal conformal supergravity in six dimensions,” JHEP 1612, 072 (2016) [arXiv:1606.02921 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [44]

    A superspace approach to extended conformal supergravity,

    P. S. Howe, “A superspace approach to extended conformal supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B 100, 389 (1981); “Supergravity in superspace,” Nucl. Phys. B 199, 309 (1982)

    1981

  36. [45]

    Symmetries of supergra vity backgrounds and supersymmetric field theory,

    S. M. Kuzenko and E. S. N. Raptakis, “Symmetries of supergra vity backgrounds and supersymmetric field theory,” JHEP 04, 133 (2020) [arXiv:1912.08552 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Superconformal geometries a nd local twistors,

    P. S. Howe and U. Lindstr¨ om, “Superconformal geometries a nd local twistors,” JHEP 04, 140 (2021) [arXiv:2012.03282 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [47]

    On conformal supergravity and projective superspace,

    S. M. Kuzenko, U. Lindstr¨ om, M. Roˇ cek and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “On conformal supergravity and projective superspace,” JHEP 08, 023 (2009) [arXiv:0905.0063 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Consistency checks on the su perspace formulation of supergravity,

    R. Grimm, J. Wess and B. Zumino, “Consistency checks on the su perspace formulation of supergravity,” Phys. Lett. B 73, 415 (1978); “A complete solution of the Bianchi identities in supers pace,” Nucl. Phys. B 152, 255 (1979)

    1978

  40. [49]

    Scale invariance in superspace,

    P. S. Howe and R. W. Tucker, “Scale invariance in superspace,” P hys. Lett. B 80, 138 (1978)

    1978

  41. [50]

    Superconformal invariance of superspace with non minimal auxiliary fields,

    W. Siegel, “Superconformal invariance of superspace with non minimal auxiliary fields,” Phys. Lett. B 80, 224 (1979)

    1979

  42. [51]

    Possible universal neutrino inter action,

    D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov, “Possible universal neutrino inter action,” JETP Lett. 16, 438 (1972) [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 16, 621 (1972)]; “Is the neutrino a Goldstone particle?,” Phys. Lett. B 46, 109 (1973)

    1972

  43. [52]

    Goldstone fields with spin 1/2,

    V. P. Akulov and D. V. Volkov, “Goldstone fields with spin 1/2,” The or. Math. Phys. 18, 28 (1974) [Teor. Mat. Fiz. 18, 39 (1974)]

    1974

  44. [53]

    Solution of the Bianchi identities in SU(2) extended su perspace with constraints,

    R. Grimm, “Solution of the Bianchi identities in SU(2) extended su perspace with constraints,” in Uni- fication of the Fundamental Particle Interactions , S. Ferrara, J. Ellis and P. van Nieuwenhuizen (Eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 1980, pp. 509-523

    1980

  45. [54]

    Normal forms of complex matrices,

    B. Zumino, “Normal forms of complex matrices,” J. Math. Phys. 3, no.5, 1055 (1962)

    1962

  46. [55]

    F. R. Gantmacher, The Theory of Matrices , Vol. 2, AMS Chelsea Publishing, 1959. 33

    1959

  47. [56]

    Field theory in 4D N=2 conformally flat superspace,

    S. M. Kuzenko and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Field theory in 4D N=2 conformally flat superspace,” JHEP 10, 001 (2008) [arXiv:0807.3368 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Three-dimensional (p,q) AdS superspaces and matter couplings,

    S. M. Kuzenko, U. Lindstr¨ om and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “ Three-dimensional (p,q) AdS superspaces and matter couplings,” JHEP 1208, 024 (2012) [arXiv:1205.4622 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Solution to constraints in Wess-Zumino supergravity formalism,

    W. Siegel, “Solution to constraints in Wess-Zumino supergravity formalism,” Nucl. Phys. B 142, 301 (1978)

    1978

  50. [59]

    Extended supersymmetric sigma models in AdS 4 from projective superspace,

    D. Butter, S. M. Kuzenko, U. Lindstr¨ om and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Extended supersymmetric sigma models in AdS 4 from projective superspace,” JHEP 05 (2012), 138 [arXiv:1203.5001 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Conformally flat supergeometry in five dimensions,

    S. M. Kuzenko and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Conformally flat supergeometry in five dimensions,” JHEP 06, 097 (2008) [arXiv:0804.1219 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Off-shell superc onformal higher spin multiplets in four dimensions,

    S. M. Kuzenko, R. Manvelyan and S. Theisen, “Off-shell superc onformal higher spin multiplets in four dimensions,” JHEP 07, 034 (2017) [arXiv:1701.00682 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Conformal geometry and (supe r)conformal higher-spin gauge theories,

    S. M. Kuzenko and M. Ponds, “Conformal geometry and (supe r)conformal higher-spin gauge theories,” JHEP 05, 113 (2019) [arXiv:1902.08010 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [63]

    The N=2 su perconformal gravitino multiplet,

    D. Hutchings, S. M. Kuzenko and E. S. N. Raptakis, “The N=2 su perconformal gravitino multiplet,” Phys. Lett. B 845, 138132 (2023) [arXiv:2305.16029 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [64]

    The conformal group in superspace,

    M. F. Sohnius, “The conformal group in superspace,” in Quantum Theory and the Structures of Time and Space, Vol. 2, L. Castell , M. Drieschner and C. F. von Weizs¨ acker (Eds.) , Carl Hanser Verlag, M¨ unchen, 1977, pp. 241-252

    1977

  56. [65]

    Hidden local supersymmetry in the supersymmetric p article action,

    W. Siegel, “Hidden local supersymmetry in the supersymmetric p article action,” Phys. Lett. B 128, 397 (1983)

    1983

  57. [66]

    Covariant description of supe rstrings,

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Covariant description of supe rstrings,” Phys. Lett. B 136, 367 (1984)

    1984

  58. [67]

    Aspects of κ-symmetry,

    E. Sezgin, “Aspects of κ-symmetry,” in: Salamfestschrift, A. Ali, J. Ellis and S. Randjbar-Saemi (Eds.), World Scientific, Singapore, 1994, pp. 478–498 [arXiv:hep-th/9310 126 [hep-th]]

    1994

  59. [68]

    All possible gener ators of supersymmetries of the S-matrix,

    R. Haag, J. T. Lopuszanski and M. Sohnius, “All possible gener ators of supersymmetries of the S-matrix,” Nucl. Phys. B 88, 257 (1975)

    1975

  60. [69]

    Conformal supergravity,

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, “Conformal supergravity,” Ph ys. Rept. 119, 233 (1985)

    1985

  61. [70]

    Supertwistors and conformal supersymmetry,

    A. Ferber, “Supertwistors and conformal supersymmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B 132, 55 (1978)

    1978

  62. [71]

    Superconformal symmetry and correlation func tions,

    J. H. Park, “Superconformal symmetry and correlation func tions,” Nucl. Phys. B 559, 455 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9903230 [hep-th]]

    1999 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Correlation functions of conse rved currents in N=2 superconformal theory,

    S. M. Kuzenko and S. Theisen, “Correlation functions of conse rved currents in N=2 superconformal theory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 665 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9907107 [hep-th]]

    2000 arXiv

  64. [73]

    Aspects of superconformal symmetry,

    E. S. N. Raptakis, “Aspects of superconformal symmetry,” [a rXiv:2403.02700 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  65. [74]

    Steenrod, The Topology of Fibre Bundles , Princeton University Press, 1951

    N. Steenrod, The Topology of Fibre Bundles , Princeton University Press, 1951

    1951

  66. [75]

    M¨ uller, Consistent Classical Supergravity Theories , (Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol

    M. M¨ uller, Consistent Classical Supergravity Theories , (Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 336), Springer, Berlin, 1989. 34

    1989

  67. [76]

    Different repre sentations for the action principle in 4D N = 2 supergravity,

    S. M. Kuzenko and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, “Different repre sentations for the action principle in 4D N = 2 supergravity,” JHEP 0904 (2009) 007 [arXiv:0812.3464 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  68. [77]

    New higher -derivative invariants in N=2 supergravity and the Gauss-Bonnet term,

    D. Butter, B. de Wit, S. M. Kuzenko and I. Lodato, “New higher -derivative invariants in N=2 supergravity and the Gauss-Bonnet term,” JHEP 1312, 062 (2013) [arXiv:1307.6546 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  69. [78]

    Non-compact duality, super-Weyl invariance and effective actions,

    S. M. Kuzenko, “Non-compact duality, super-Weyl invariance and effective actions,” JHEP 07, 222 (2020) [arXiv:2006.00966 [hep-th]]. 35

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.