Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Generation of Tunable Correlated Frequency Comb via Four-Wave-Mixing in Optical fibers

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An all-fiber Sagnac loop generates a tunable comb of correlated photon pairs aligned to the ITU telecom grid.

desk verdict A useful incremental all-fiber FWM source with real coincidence data, but the 'photon-pair' claim needs a nonclassicality witness or softer language. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03323 v1 pith:E25NZG6E submitted 2024-12-04 quant-ph

Aryan Bhardwaj , Debanuj Chatterjee , Ashutosh Kumar Singh , Anil Prabhakar This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 42.65.Wi42.50.-p
keywords four-wavemixingphoton-paircombhighlynonlinearfiberSagnacloopcoincidencemeasurementITUfrequencygridSchrödingerequationtemporalcorrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports an all-fiber source that turns a continuous-wave pump and a mode-locked-laser frequency comb into a comb of correlated photon pairs by four-wave mixing in a highly nonlinear fiber inside a Sagnac loop. The authors claim that the signal and idler lines sit on a 50 GHz grid aligned with ITU telecom channels, with the output tunable by shifting the pump wavelength. Coincidence measurements yield up to 32 kcps with a coincidence-to-accidental ratio of $17\pm1$, and the spectral sidebands match simulations of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation. If the claim holds, it offers a fiber-integrated, multiplexed photon-pair source that avoids the coupling losses of bulk crystals and could plug directly into existing telecom networks. The authors themselves note that a non-classicality test such as $g^{(2)}(0)<1/2$ is left to future work.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is four-wave mixing in a Sagnac loop built around 1 km of highly nonlinear fiber (HNLF, $\gamma = 11\ (\mathrm{W\cdot km})^{-1}$). A continuous-wave tunable pump and a 50 GHz-filtered comb from a mode-locked laser copropagate, and phase matching selects pairs of signal and idler frequencies placed symmetrically about the pump according to $s_j,i_j = f_p \pm j\Delta f$. The Sagnac loop, a waveshaper acting as a channel filter, and superconducting nanowire detectors isolate and time-tag the individual comb lines; the numerical counterpart is the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with $\beta_2,\beta_3,\beta_4$ derived from a quadratic dispersion fit, solved by the split-step Fourier method.

What would settle it

Measure the second-order cross-correlation between signal and idler under the same conditions: a Hanbury Brown–Twiss measurement of $g^{(2)}(0)$ on the idler conditioned on the signal, or a two-photon interference visibility test, would settle whether the correlations are quantum. If the conditional $g^{(2)}(0)$ stays at or above $1/2$, the claim that the comb consists of correlated photon pairs would not survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that launching a tunable CW pump together with a mode-locked-laser comb through 1 km of highly nonlinear fiber in a Sagnac configuration generates multiple signal–idler pairs whose frequencies obey $s_j,i_j = f_p \pm j\Delta f$, where $\Delta f = 50$ GHz is the comb-line spacing and $f_p$ is the pump frequency. The pairs are temporally correlated: time-tagged detections at symmetric signal and idler wavelengths show a coincidence peak at 33.5 ns (from the path-length offset) followed by side peaks at the 22.47 MHz repetition period of the mode-locked laser, with coincidence-to-accidental ratios between 3 and 18 across the five pairs studied. The experimental output spectrum is reproduced by a split-step Fourier simulation of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with the fiber's measured dispersion fitted as a quadratic over the C-band.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the measured coincidence peaks (for example the 33.5 ns peak) are produced by FWM-generated photon pairs rather than by classical intensity correlations, amplified spontaneous emission, or pump leakage; the paper checks that counts fall when the pump or EDFA is off, but it does not apply a quantum nonclassicality test.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The source generates multiple correlated photon pairs on a 50 GHz ITU-aligned grid from a single fiber loop, so wavelength-multiplexed channels can be addressed independently.
  • Tuning the CW pump wavelength shifts the phase-matching condition, which tunes the generated signal and idler wavelengths, giving a flexible way to choose pair channels.
  • Because the source is all-fiber, it can be spliced into a telecom network, avoiding the alignment and loss issues of bulk-crystal photon-pair sources.
  • The NLSE simulation with split-step Fourier propagation reproduces the observed sideband spectrum, supporting the claim that the observed sidebands arise from FWM rather than from another nonlinear process.
  • Coincidence rates up to 32 kcps with a coincidence-to-accidental ratio of $17\pm1$ demonstrate strong temporal correlation in the first pair, though the authors defer a nonclassicality test to future work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive test of nonclassicality would be a Hanbury Brown–Twiss measurement: the second-order correlation at zero delay $g^{(2)}(0)$ should drop below $1/2$ for heralded photon pairs; the current CAR and coincidence data alone do not rule out classical intensity correlations.
  • The same setup could be extended to polarization entanglement by adding a polarization Sagnac loop or using a polarization-entangled pump, since the comb structure already multiplexes many pair channels.
  • The 22.47 MHz secondary peaks in the coincidence histogram provide a built-in timing reference; a future source could use this comb repetition to synchronize detectors in a QKD link.
  • The simulation's sensitivity to pump and comb power adjustments suggests that a fully predictive model would need independent calibration of the nonlinear phase, which could be tested by varying the pump power and comparing sideband growth.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an all-fiber experimental setup in which a CW pump and a mode-locked-laser frequency comb interact through four-wave mixing in a 1 km HNLF arranged in a Sagnac loop. The authors claim the generation of a tunable correlated photon-pair comb aligned with the 50 GHz ITU grid, supported by coincidence measurements on five signal-idler pairs with a maximum coincidence rate of 32 kcps and a coincidence-to-accidental ratio of 17±1. A numerical simulation based on the nonlinear Schrödinger equation is used to model the FWM process, and the resulting sideband spectra are compared with experiment. The central claim is presented in the abstract and in Section V, where the authors state they 'demonstrated a method to generate tunable correlated photon-pair comb on the ITU grid' and note that 'Future work involves validating this setup as a reliable non-classical source.'

Significance. If fully established, the reported source would be a useful telecom-compatible multiplexed photon-pair comb: the all-fiber Sagnac design and the 50 GHz channel spacing align with existing communication infrastructure, and the five simultaneously measured signal-idler pairs represent a concrete multiplexing step. The paper's strengths include direct coincidence measurements with background checks, a clear description of the experimental layout, and an NLSE-based simulation that captures the qualitative sideband structure. However, the central claim currently outruns the evidence: no nonclassicality witness is reported, and the authors explicitly defer validation of the source as non-classical. The coincidence-to-accidental ratio alone does not distinguish photon pairs from classical intensity correlations, and the simulation agreement is qualitative and depends on adjusted input powers. As a result, the manuscript demonstrates correlated classical light with the expected spectral structure, but not yet a demonstrably quantum photon-pair source.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, Fig. 5; Section V] The central claim that the setup generates a 'correlated photon-pair comb' is not supported by a nonclassicality witness. The measured coincidence peak and CAR 17±1 (Fig. 5) can be mimicked by classical intensity correlations, such as common pump power fluctuations imprinted on both FWM sidebands or correlated ASE noise passing the Waveshaper; a coincidence-to-accidental ratio greater than one is not sufficient to establish nonclassical photon-pair generation. The pump-off and EDFA-off checks in Section IV exclude simple pump leakage and dark-count contributions, but they do not exclude classical correlations. The manuscript itself states in Section V that 'Future work involves validating this setup as a reliable non-classical source,' which is an explicit admission that the nonclassical nature of the emission is not established. To support the central claim, the authors should either report a quantum test (for example, g^(2)(0) < 1/2 for a heralded signal, violation of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for signal-idler cross-correlations, or a similar nonclassicality witness) or weaken the wording throughout the abstract, title, and conclusion to 'correlated classical light' or 'correlated photon pairs pending nonclassicality validation.'
  2. [Section III, Fig. 4] The text states that 'numerical predictions agreeing with our experimental results,' but the simulation agreement is qualitative and depends on adjustable input parameters. In Section III, 'the input pump and comb powers were adjusted within tolerable limits,' and the dispersion coefficients D0, D1, D2 come from a quadratic fit to manufacturer data, while the comb-line shape uses an assumed Gaussian FWHM of 21.23 MHz. No quantitative error metric, sensitivity analysis, or measure of spectral agreement is given. As presented, the simulation confirms that the expected sideband structure can be produced, but it does not provide the quantitative validation implied by the phrase 'numerical predictions agreeing with our experimental results.'
  3. [Section IV] The reported coincidence and CAR values are not backed by sufficient detector characterization. The paper gives no dark count rate, detection efficiency, dead time, timing jitter, or coincidence window for the SNSPD/time-tagger system. Signal rates are quoted only as ranges (894 kcps–1.1 Mcps), and the statement that CAR precision is 'up to 3 standard deviations' is not defined. These details are needed to assess whether the maximum coincidence rate of 32 kcps and CAR 17±1 are robust and whether the claimed 'high-quality temporal correlations' are properly benchmarked against detector noise.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 4 caption] The caption reports the pump wavelength as 1547.12 nm, whereas Section II and Fig. 3 describe a pump at 1550.12 nm; please clarify whether these are different experimental settings or whether one value is a typo.
  2. [Section IV, Fig. 6(B) caption] The caption states R_s ≃ 600 kcps, while the text reports signal detection rates between 894 kcps and 1.1 Mcps; the quoted values should be reconciled.
  3. [Section III, Eq. (2)-(6)] The sign conventions and units for β3 and β4 should be stated explicitly; the connection between the quadratic D(λ) fit and the expansion coefficients should be checked for consistency, since the coefficients D0, D1, and D2 have different units.
  4. [Section IV, Fig. 5(A)] The text says the first coincidence peak appears at 33.5 ns and secondary peaks occur every 44.5 ns, corresponding to the 22.47 MHz MLL repetition rate; it would help to state explicitly whether the 33.5 ns offset is a fixed path-length/electronic delay and why the secondary peaks are evenly spaced from it.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical and styling issues, including inconsistent hyphenation ('non-linear' vs. 'nonlinear'), the garbled 'Schr ¨odinger' in the abstract, and a truncated axis label 'Pow' in Fig. 4(a); a careful proofread would improve the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the photon-pair comb claim rests on new coincidence measurements, and prior self-citations and the calibrated simulation are not load-bearing reductions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim (Abstract; Section V) is that an all-fiber HNLF Sagnac setup generates a tunable correlated photon-pair comb on the ITU grid. The supporting evidence is the coincidence histogram in Fig. 5 with a maximum coincidence rate of 32 kcps and CAR 17±1, the pump/EDFA-off checks in Section IV, and the correlation measurements across the five symmetric channel pairs. This evidence is measured directly and is not constructed from the claimed conclusion. Equation (1), sj,ij = fp ± j∆f, is the standard FWM energy-conservation/phase-matching relation used to label the sidebands; the paper does not derive that relation from the data, and observing coincidence peaks at the selected symmetric channels is a substantive experimental test rather than a tautology. The NLSE simulation in Section III is calibrated to the experiment: the input comb is built from the measured input spectrum and the pump and comb powers are 'adjusted within tolerable limits'; the resulting spectral comparison is a consistency check supporting the FWM interpretation, not an independently fitted quantity presented as a prediction of the central result. The paper cites prior work by the same group [27], [30] for the original setup and the phase-matching condition, but the central photon-pair claim here depends on the new coincidence measurements, not on the self-citations; they provide context and prior method, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported through them. The explicit deferral in Section V ('validating this setup as a reliable non-classical source' is future work) is an evidentiary limitation—CAR alone is not a nonclassicality witness—but it is a correctness/evidence concern, not circularity. No self-definitional step, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, load-bearing self-citation, imported uniqueness, ansatz-by-citation, or renaming of a known result is present in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental claim does not depend on new entities. The simulation validation has free parameters (dispersion fit coefficients, input power scaling, assumed comb line width) and relies on a classical NLSE, so it cannot independently certify photon-pair generation. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • D0, D1, D2 dispersion coefficients = D0=-2.36e-4 s/m^2, D1=297.5 s/m^3, D2=-9.4e7 s/m^4
    Obtained by quadratic fit to manufacturer dispersion data; used in Eqs. (3)-(6) to set beta2, beta3, beta4 for the NLSE simulation.
  • Input pump power scaling = Not specified; adjusted within tolerable limits
    Used to match simulation to experiment due to unknown time-domain peak power.
  • Input comb power scaling = Not specified; adjusted within tolerable limits
    Used to match simulation to experiment due to unquantified losses.
  • Comb line Gaussian FWHM = 21.23 MHz (derived from assumed TFPF finesse of 1000)
    Assumed spectral width of each MLL comb line after filtering; not directly measured with the 3 GHz OSA.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The HNLF dispersion can be represented by a quadratic fit D(lambda)=D2*lambda^2 + D1*lambda + D0 over the C-band (Eq. 3).
    Underpins beta2, beta3, beta4 and all NLSE results; relies on manufacturer data and fit.
  • domain assumption The classical nonlinear Schrodinger equation (Eq. 2) describes the FWM dynamics adequately for the purposes of the simulation.
    Used for all simulations; a classical model cannot certify nonclassical photon-pair correlations.
  • domain assumption Input comb lines are transform-limited with Gaussian envelopes and 22.47 MHz spacing (Section III).
    Authors state the transform-limited assumption and acknowledge that adding a chirp could improve agreement.
  • standard math Split-step Fourier method with dz=10 m accurately solves Eq. (2).
    Standard numerical method; assumed convergent without a convergence study.
  • domain assumption FWM processes obey Eq. (1), s_j, i_j = f_p +/- j*Delta_f with Delta_f = 50 GHz, and efficiency decreases with j.
    Used to identify signal/idler pairs and interpret the correlation matrix in Fig. 6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Generation of Tunable Correlated Frequency Comb via Four-Wave-Mixing in Optical fibers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E25NZG6E

@misc{pith2026241203323,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Generation of Tunable Correlated Frequency Comb via Four-Wave-Mixing in Optical fibers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E25NZG6E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03323}
}
abstract

We report an all-fiber-based experimental setup to generate a correlated photon-pair comb using Four Wave Mixing (FWM) in Highly Non-Linear Fiber (HNLF). Temporal correlations of the generated photons were confirmed through coincidence measurements. We observed a maximum of 32 kcps, with a coincidence to accidental ratio of 17$\pm$1. To further understand the underlying processes, we also simulated a generalized FWM event involving the interaction between an arbitrary frequency comb and a Continuous Wave (CW) pump. Non-linear dynamics through the HNLF were modelled using Schr\"odinger propagation equations, with numerical predictions agreeing with our experimental results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03323 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. The frequency lines in the MLL-based frequency comb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the setup with an HNLF in a Sagnac loop configuration. MLL : mode locked laser, EDF : Erbium Doped fiber, WDM: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Frequency spectrum of the MLL (orange). Wavelength comb at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Generation of photon-pair comb lines via FWM at the output port of Sagnac loop. The CW pump laser is centered at 1550.12 nm, away from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plots of (a) input and (b) output spectra of the HNLF with pump wavelength centered at 1547.12 nm, comparing the experimental data (red) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A: The time differences between photon arrivals of s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A: Correlation matrix depicting TFPF comb frequencies, with each row and column representing a unique comb frequency. Non-diagonal matrix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Photon pair comb generation using four wave mixing in a highly nonlinear fiber,

    D. Chatterjee, G. K. Shaw, and A. Prabhakar, “Photon pair comb generation using four wave mixing in a highly nonlinear fiber,” in 2022 Workshop on Recent Advances in Photonics (WRAP) , pp. 1–2, IEEE, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [30]

    Four wave mixing with frequency combs in a highly non-linear fiber,

    G. K. Shaw and A. Prabhakar, “Four wave mixing with frequency combs in a highly non-linear fiber,” in 2021 IEEE Photonics Conference (IPC) , pp. 1–2, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [1]

    Photonic quantum technologies,

    J. L. O’brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vu ˇckovi´c, “Photonic quantum technologies,” Nature Photonics, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 687–695, 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [2]

    Quantum computers,

    T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y . Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. L. O’Brien, “Quantum computers,” nature, vol. 464, no. 7285, pp. 45–53, 2010

    work page 2010

  5. [3]

    A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit,

    T. L. S. Collaboration, “A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit,” Nature Physics , vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 962–965, 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [4]

    Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states,

    C. H. Bennett, “Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 68, no. 21, p. 3121, 1992

    work page 1992

  7. [5]

    Experimental quantum teleportation,

    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, “Experimental quantum teleportation,” Nature, vol. 390, no. 6660, pp. 575–579, 1997

    work page 1997

  8. [6]

    Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics,

    L.-M. Duan, M. D. Lukin, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics,” Nature, vol. 414, no. 6862, pp. 413–418, 2001

    2001

Show all 36 references
  1. [7]

    Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution,

    S.-K. Liao, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y . Liu, L. Zhang, Y . Li, J.-G. Ren, J. Yin, Q. Shen, Y . Cao, Z.-P. Li, et al. , “Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution,” Nature, vol. 549, no. 7670, pp. 43–47, 2017

    2017

  2. [8]

    Optical-fiber source of polarization-entangled photons in the 1550 nm telecom band,

    X. Li, P. L. V oss, J. E. Sharping, and P. Kumar, “Optical-fiber source of polarization-entangled photons in the 1550 nm telecom band,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 5, p. 053601, 2005

    2005

  3. [9]

    On-chip generation of high-dimensional entangled quantum states and their coherent control,

    M. Kues, C. Reimer, P. Roztocki, L. R. Cort ´es, S. Sciara, B. Wetzel, Y . Zhang, A. Cino, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little,et al., “On-chip generation of high-dimensional entangled quantum states and their coherent control,” Nature, vol. 546, no. 7660, pp. 622–626, 2017

    2017

  4. [10]

    Ultrabright quantum photon sources on chip,

    Z. Ma, J.-Y . Chen, Z. Li, C. Tang, Y . M. Sua, H. Fan, and Y .-P. Huang, “Ultrabright quantum photon sources on chip,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 125, no. 26, p. 263602, 2020

    2020

  5. [11]

    Multi-photon entanglement in high dimensions,

    M. Malik, M. Erhard, M. Huber, M. Krenn, R. Fickler, and A. Zeilinger, “Multi-photon entanglement in high dimensions,” Nature Photonics , vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 248–252, 2016

    2016

  6. [12]

    Two-photon entanglement in type-ii parametric down-conversion,

    Y . Shih, A. Sergienko, M. H. Rubin, T. Kiess, and C. Alley, “Two-photon entanglement in type-ii parametric down-conversion,” Physical Review A, vol. 50, no. 1, p. 23, 1994

    1994

  7. [13]

    Direct generation of photon triplets using cascaded photon-pair sources,

    H. H ¨ubel, D. R. Hamel, A. Fedrizzi, S. Ramelow, K. J. Resch, and T. Jennewein, “Direct generation of photon triplets using cascaded photon-pair sources,” Nature, vol. 466, no. 7306, pp. 601–603, 2010

    2010

  8. [14]

    Practical challenges in quantum key distribution,

    E. Diamanti, H.-K. Lo, B. Qi, and Z. Yuan, “Practical challenges in quantum key distribution,” NPJ Quantum Information , vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2016

    2016

  9. [15]

    A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing,

    K. Alexander et al. , “A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing,” arXiv Preprint quant-ph/2404.17570 , 4 2024

    2024 arXiv

  10. [16]

    K. J. Buschow, Encyclopedia of materials: science and technology . Elsevier, 2001

    2001

  11. [17]

    On-chip quantum interference between silicon photon-pair sources,

    J. W. Silverstone, D. Bonneau, K. Ohira, N. Suzuki, H. Yoshida, N. Iizuka, M. Ezaki, C. M. Natarajan, M. G. Tanner, R. H. Had- field, et al., “On-chip quantum interference between silicon photon-pair sources,” Nature Photonics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 104–108, 2014

    2014

  12. [18]

    Multifrequency sources of quantum correlated photon pairs on-chip: a path toward integrated quantum frequency combs,

    L. Caspani, C. Reimer, M. Kues, P. Roztocki, M. Clerici, B. Wetzel, Y . Jestin, M. Ferrera, M. Peccianti, A. Pasquazi, et al., “Multifrequency sources of quantum correlated photon pairs on-chip: a path toward integrated quantum frequency combs,” Nanophotonics, vol. 5, no. 2, p...

    2016

  13. [19]

    Phase matched parametric amplification via four- wave mixing in optical microfibers,

    M. I. Abdul Khudus, F. De Lucia, C. Corbari, T. Lee, P. Horak, P. Sazio, and G. Brambilla, “Phase matched parametric amplification via four- wave mixing in optical microfibers,” Optics Letters , vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 761–764, 2016

    2016

  14. [20]

    Efficient frequency conversion based on resonant four-wave mixing,

    C.-Y . Cheng, Z.-Y . Liu, P.-S. Hu, T.-N. Wang, C.-Y . Chien, J.-K. Lin, J.-Y . Juo, J.-S. Shiu, I. A. Yu, Y .-C. Chen, et al. , “Efficient frequency conversion based on resonant four-wave mixing,” Optics Letters, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 681–684, 2021

    2021

  15. [21]

    Observation of squeezed states generated by four-wave mixing in an optical cavity,

    R. Slusher, L. Hollberg, B. Yurke, J. Mertz, and J. Valley, “Observation of squeezed states generated by four-wave mixing in an optical cavity,” Physical Review Letters , vol. 55, no. 22, p. 2409, 1985

    1985

  16. [22]

    Translation of quantum states by four-wave mixing in fibers,

    C. McKinstrie, J. Harvey, S. Radic, and M. Raymer, “Translation of quantum states by four-wave mixing in fibers,” Optics Express, vol. 13, no. 22, pp. 9131–9142, 2005

    2005

  17. [23]

    Heralding single photons from a high-q silicon microdisk,

    X. Lu, S. Rogers, T. Gerrits, W. C. Jiang, S. W. Nam, and Q. Lin, “Heralding single photons from a high-q silicon microdisk,” Optica, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1331–1338, 2016

    2016

  18. [24]

    Photonic quantum information process- ing: A concise review,

    S. Slussarenko and G. J. Pryde, “Photonic quantum information process- ing: A concise review,” Applied Physics Reviews , vol. 6, no. 4, 2019

    2019

  19. [25]

    Nonclassical interference and entanglement generation using a photonic crystal fiber pair photon source,

    J. Fulconis, O. Alibart, J. L. O’Brien, W. J. Wadsworth, and J. G. Rarity, “Nonclassical interference and entanglement generation using a photonic crystal fiber pair photon source,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 99, p. 120501, Sep 2007

    2007

  20. [26]

    Fiber-based photon-pair generation: tutorial,

    K. Garay-Palmett, D. B. Kim, Y . Zhang, F. A. Dom ´ınguez-Serna, V . O. Lorenz, and A. B. U’Ren, “Fiber-based photon-pair generation: tutorial,” JOSA B , vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 469–490, 2023

    2023

  21. [28]

    Highly efficient generation of broadband cascaded four-wave mixing products,

    A. C. S. Jr, J. C. Boggio, A. Rieznik, H. Hernandez-Figueroa, H. Frag- nito, and J. Knight, “Highly efficient generation of broadband cascaded four-wave mixing products,” Optics Express , vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2816– 2828, 2008

    2008

  22. [29]

    Generation of wideband frequency combs by continuous-wave seeding of multistage mixers with synthesized dispersion,

    E. Myslivets, B. P. Kuo, N. Alic, and S. Radic, “Generation of wideband frequency combs by continuous-wave seeding of multistage mixers with synthesized dispersion,” Optics Express, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 3331–3344, 2012

    2012

  23. [31]

    High-power, mid-infrared, picosecond pulses generated by compression of a co 2 laser beat-wave in gaas,

    J. Pigeon, S. Y . Tochitsky, and C. Joshi, “High-power, mid-infrared, picosecond pulses generated by compression of a co 2 laser beat-wave in gaas,” Optics Letters , vol. 40, no. 24, pp. 5730–5733, 2015

    2015

  24. [32]

    0.1–1-thz high-repetition-rate femtosecond pulse generation from quasi-cw dual-pumped all-fiber phase-locked kerr combs,

    Z. Luo, M. Zhong, Q. Ruan, Y . Huang, C. Guo, H. Xu, K. Che, B. Xu, and Z. Cai, “0.1–1-thz high-repetition-rate femtosecond pulse generation from quasi-cw dual-pumped all-fiber phase-locked kerr combs,” IEEE Photonics Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    Optical frequency comb generation in highly nonlinear fiber with dual-mode square microlasers,

    H.-Z. Weng, Y .-Z. Huang, X.-W. Ma, Y .-D. Yang, J.-L. Xiao, J.-Y . Han, and M.-L. Liao, “Optical frequency comb generation in highly nonlinear fiber with dual-mode square microlasers,” IEEE Photonics Journal, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2018

    2018

  26. [34]

    10-ghz self-referenced optical frequency comb,

    A. Bartels, D. Heinecke, and S. A. Diddams, “10-ghz self-referenced optical frequency comb,” Science, vol. 326, no. 5953, pp. 681–681, 2009

    2009

  27. [35]

    Optical fiber amplifiers-review,

    M. Wasfi, “Optical fiber amplifiers-review,” International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security (IJCNIS) , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42–47, 2009

    2009

  28. [36]

    Nonlinear fiber optics,

    G. P. Agrawal, “Nonlinear fiber optics,” in Nonlinear Science at the Dawn of the 21st Century , pp. 195–211, Springer, 2000

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.