Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 80 references

Transport Signatures of Radial Rashba Spin-Orbit Coupling at Ferromagnet/Superconductor Interfaces

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Radial Rashba spin-orbit coupling can be extracted from the in-plane magnetization shift of the tunneling anomalous Hall conductance in ferromagnet/superconductor junctions.

desk verdict A solid, standard-machinery paper that turns θ_R into measurable magnetization-angle shifts; the extraction is clean under the linear model, with a k-dependence caveat that revision should address. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03994 v2 pith:SZFINL3Y submitted 2024-12-05 cond-mat.supr-con

Andreas Costa , Jaroslav Fabian This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords radialRashbaspin-orbitcouplingtunnelinganomalousHalleffectmagnetoanisotropicAndreevreflectionferromagnet/superconductorjunctiontwistedvanderWaalsbarrierangletexture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At a ferromagnet/barrier/superconductor tunnel junction whose barrier carries radial Rashba spin-orbit coupling, this paper predicts that the in-plane transport magnetoanisotropies pick up rigid angular shifts set by the Rashba angle $\theta_\mathrm{R}$. Specifically, the tunneling anomalous Hall conductances follow $G_x \propto -\alpha \sin(\phi-\theta_\mathrm{R})$ and $G_y \propto \alpha \cos(\phi-\theta_\mathrm{R})$, and the in-plane magnetoanisotropic Andreev reflection shifts by $\theta_\mathrm{R}/2$ when a weak Dresselhaus field is added. Since $\theta_\mathrm{R}$ quantifies the spin texture of the interfacial spin-orbit field (spin parallel versus perpendicular to momentum), reading these shifts would provide a direct electrical probe of twisted van der Waals barriers. The calculation uses ballistic scattering theory and shows that the shifts survive chemical-potential and mass mismatches between the electrodes, which is why the authors propose them as a robust extraction scheme.

What carries the argument

The central object is the interfacial spin-orbit field $\hat{\Omega}(\mathbf{k}_\parallel)$ of Eq. (2), a single vector field combining conventional Rashba, radial Rashba, and Dresselhaus terms, with the radial content quantified by $\theta_\mathrm{R}$. The argument is carried by a parity expansion of the tunneling-anomalous-Hall conductance in powers of $\hat{m}\cdot\hat{\Omega}(\mathbf{k}_\parallel)$ [Eq. (15)]: the zeroth-order term vanishes by parity, the first-order term survives, and it evaluates to $G_x \propto -\alpha \sin(\phi-\theta_\mathrm{R})$ and $G_y \propto \alpha \cos(\phi-\theta_\mathrm{R})$. The same spin-orbit field, when it interferes with a weak Dresselhaus component, modulates spin-flip Andreev reflection and therefore the subgap tunneling conductance, producing the $\Delta\phi = \theta_\mathrm{R}/2$ shift of the in-plane magnetoanisotropic Andreev reflection; the shift is most pronounced when the Dresselhaus strength approaches the Rashba strength.

What would settle it

Measure $G_x(\phi)$ and $G_y(\phi)$ on a junction with a twisted van der Waals barrier and check whether the traces are fitted by a single rigid shift of the sine and cosine forms. If the phase offset changes with bias, carrier density, or barrier thickness, or if the curves distort rather than translate, then the linear-rotation form of Eq. (2) is falsified rather than confirmed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the Rashba angle $\theta_\mathrm{R}$ of the interfacial spin-orbit field leaves a distinctive fingerprint in tunneling transport: it re-angles the in-plane magnetization dependence. For the tunneling anomalous Hall conductances the result is $G_x \propto -\alpha \sin(\phi-\theta_\mathrm{R})$ and $G_y \propto \alpha \cos(\phi-\theta_\mathrm{R})$ (Eqs. (16)-(17)), so a full in-plane magnetization sweep directly exposes $\theta_\mathrm{R}$ as the phase offset, and the same $\Delta\phi=\theta_\mathrm{R}$ shift appears in the Hall supercurrent responses on the superconducting side. In the tunneling conductance, $\theta_\mathrm{R}$ is invisible when only Rashba coupling is present---out-of-plane and in-plane magnetoanisotropies are $\theta_\mathrm{R}$-invariant---but once a Dresselhaus field is added, the in-plane conductance trace and the magnetoanisotropic Andreev reflection acquire a $\Delta\phi=\theta_\mathrm{R}/2$ shift. The authors verify numerically that these shifts survive chemical-potential and mass mismatches and argue, from the rotation symmetry of the spin-orbit field, that the shifts are protected against other perturbative effects as long as that symmetry is intact.

Load-bearing premise

The extraction scheme assumes that the interfacial spin-orbit field is exactly the linear-in-wave-vector form of Eq. (2), with a single momentum-independent Rashba angle $\theta_\mathrm{R}$ that enters purely by rotating the field; if the barrier's spin texture is more complex or $\theta_\mathrm{R}$ varies over the Fermi surface, the predicted rigid shifts would no longer directly measure the interface property.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Measuring $G_x(\phi)$ and $G_y(\phi)$ at zero bias gives a direct experimental readout of $\theta_\mathrm{R}$ from the phase offset, with no need for Dresselhaus coupling.
  • The same $\Delta\phi=\theta_\mathrm{R}$ shift appears in Hall supercurrent responses on the superconducting side, offering a second independent probe of the Rashba angle.
  • When Dresselhaus coupling is present, the in-plane tunneling conductance and the magnetoanisotropic Andreev reflection shift by $\theta_\mathrm{R}/2$, providing a complementary extraction route that also signals the presence of Dresselhaus physics.
  • The shifts survive chemical-potential and mass mismatches between the electrodes, so the extraction scheme should work in real junctions made of dissimilar materials.
  • The $\theta_\mathrm{R}$ shift is argued to be protected by the rotation symmetry of the spin-orbit field, so it should survive weak disorder, charging, and strain as long as the field symmetry is preserved.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the scheme works, the twist angle of a van der Waals barrier could be mapped electrically: each twist angle would correspond to a measured $\theta_\mathrm{R}$, giving a transport-based alternative to spin-texture probes.
  • Because the extraction assumes a momentum-independent $\theta_\mathrm{R}$, a momentum-dependent Rashba angle would show up as a deviation from a rigid shift; the distortion of the trace would itself become a probe of the spin texture's momentum structure.
  • Because the normal-state Hall effect shows the same shift (though two orders of magnitude smaller), the extraction might also be feasible without superconductivity if the sensitivity can be improved.
  • Measuring both the $\theta_\mathrm{R}/2$ shift in the conductance channel and the $\theta_\mathrm{R}$ shift in the Hall channel on the same junction would provide a consistency check: confirming the factor-of-two ratio would strengthen the interpretation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper theoretically studies a ballistic ferromagnet/barrier/superconductor junction with an interfacial spin-orbit field that includes conventional Rashba, radial Rashba (characterized by an angle theta_R), and Dresselhaus contributions. Using a Blonder--Tinkham--Klapwijk-type scattering calculation, the authors compute the tunneling conductance and the transverse (anomalous Hall) conductances as functions of the magnetization direction. The central results are: (i) the out-of-plane magnetoanisotropy is independent of theta_R; (ii) in the presence of weak Dresselhaus SOC, the in-plane magnetoanisotropic Andreev reflection (MAAR) is shifted by Delta_phi = theta_R/2; and (iii) the tunneling anomalous Hall conductances and Hall supercurrents are shifted by Delta_phi = theta_R, allowing a direct experimental determination of theta_R. The shifts are shown to be robust against chemical-potential and effective-mass mismatches between the electrodes.

Significance. The proposed transport signatures are concrete and falsifiable, and the paper gives a transparent first-order parity argument (Eqs. (15)--(19)) that explains the angular structure of the Hall conductances. The numerical solution of the full scattering problem supports the analytic result, and the predicted signals are sizable (up to roughly 10% of the tunneling conductance for the Hall response). The work directly addresses an experimentally relevant quantity, the Rashba angle theta_R in twisted van der Waals barriers, and the robustness checks in Sec. IV strengthen the proposal. The main weakness is the assumption of a strictly linear, k-independent spin-orbit field, which is discussed in the major comments.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. II, Eq. (2); Sec. IV] The extraction protocol assumes a spin-orbit field that is strictly linear in k with a single, k-independent Rashba angle theta_R. The paper's motivation is the radial Rashba SOC predicted for twisted van der Waals heterostructures (Refs. [21,22,35,36]); however, those first-principles studies describe spin textures that can vary with |k| and with azimuthal direction (e.g., trigonal warping) and can contain higher-order terms. If theta_R = theta_R(k_parallel) is not constant, the k_parallel integrals in Eqs. (12)--(13) superpose contributions with different phase shifts, so the zero crossing of G_x no longer occurs at phi = theta_R(k_F) but at a Fermi-surface average; similarly, the MAAR shift in Sec. III.A becomes a weighted average rather than theta_R/2. The robustness checks in Sec. IV vary masses and chemical potentials but keep the isotropic linear form of Eq. (2) fixed. Since the central message is that theta_R can be read off directly from the measured shifts, the authors should either (i) perform a numerical test with a k-dependent theta_R (for example, theta_R(k) = theta_R0 + delta_theta_R (k/k_F)^2 or an azimuthal modulation) and show that the shift remains equal to the angle characterizing the Fermi-surface average, or (ii) explicitly state that the extracted quantity is an effective angle and discuss its relation to the microscopic theta_R(k). This is a load-bearing limitation of the proposed protocol.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III.A, Eq. (14)] The use of theta_R/2 as the reference angle in the MAAR definition makes the reference coincide with the conductance maximum; this should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion about the sign and the dependence on theta_R.
  2. [Fig. 3 and Fig. 5 captions] The curves for different theta_R values are not accompanied by a legend; please add a legend or list the theta_R values in the captions to make the figures self-contained.
  3. [Appendix A, Eq. (A7)] The expression for the Hall supercurrent has a line break in the middle of the fraction that makes the formula hard to read; rewriting the equation in a single fraction or with an explicit bracket would improve clarity.
  4. [Appendix A] The spelling 'Bogoljubov' is inconsistent with 'Bogoliubov' used elsewhere in the paper.
  5. [Sec. III.B] The statement that superconducting junctions enhance the tunneling anomalous Hall effect relative to the normal state would be more informative if the enhancement factor (about two orders of magnitude, based on a comparison of Figs. 5 and 6) were stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the θ_R-dependent shifts are computed from the BdG scattering problem, not defined into the conductance formulas; self-citations provide context only.

full rationale

The paper's input is the model Hamiltonian, Eq. (2), in which θ_R parameterizes a rotated Rashba field. The claimed predictions—the Δφ=θ_R shift of the tunneling anomalous Hall conductances and the Δφ=θ_R/2 shift of the in-plane magnetoanisotropic Andreev reflection—are not defined in terms of θ_R in the observables. The conductances G_z and G_{x,y} are computed from the scattering amplitudes obtained by solving the BdG equations with boundary conditions, Eqs. (10)-(13); the angular shifts emerge from the parity expansion, Eq. (15), and from the numerical solution, and would be nontrivial even if θ_R appeared only in the Hamiltonian. There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no quantity is defined so that the result follows by construction. Eq. (14) normalizes the MAAR at the already-computed maximum angle θ_R/2, but this is a display choice, not the source of the predicted conductance shift. Self-citations to Refs. [5, 48, 60] supply the transport formulas and a symmetry argument, but the present numerical solution independently produces the same shifts, so the citations are not load-bearing. The robustness checks in Sec. IV vary masses and chemical potentials while keeping the linear-in-k spin-orbit form; the sensitivity of the extraction to k-dependent θ_R is a model limitation, not circularity. Verdict: no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is a forward scattering theory with no fitted experimental data and no new entities. The main load-bearing input is the assumed linear-in-k form of the interfacial spin-orbit field and the existence of a fixed Rashba angle theta_R; the paper's contribution is to show what measurable consequence follows.

free parameters (2)
  • Rashba angle theta_R
    Input parameter defining the mix of conventional and radial Rashba spin-orbit coupling in Eq. (2); the paper's goal is to show how to measure it, not to fit it.
  • Representative junction parameters = lambda_R=1, lambda_D=0.1, P=0.4, Z=1
    Chosen values for the numerical figures. The predicted Delta_phi shifts are shown to persist across variations in Sec. IV, so they do not enter as fitted constants.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Bogoliubov-de Gennes and Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwijk scattering formalism
    Used to define transport in Sec. II, Eqs. (1)-(13).
  • domain assumption Delta-function barrier with linear-in-k spin-orbit field of the form Eq. (2)
    The interfacial spin-orbit coupling is modeled as a delta(z) barrier with Omega(k) linear in k and a single Rashba angle theta_R; this is central to the predicted shifts.
  • domain assumption Andreev approximation E, Delta_0 much less than mu, with equal masses and chemical potentials in the main text
    Used in Eqs. (8)-(9) and Sec. II; mismatches are addressed later in Sec. IV.
  • domain assumption Radial Rashba spin-orbit coupling exists at twisted van der Waals interfaces as a k-independent angle
    Borrowed from first-principles Refs. [21,22,35,36]; the paper does not derive it from microscopic theory.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transport Signatures of Radial Rashba Spin-Orbit Coupling at Ferromagnet/Superconductor Interfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SZFINL3Y

@misc{pith2026241203994,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transport Signatures of Radial Rashba Spin-Orbit Coupling at Ferromagnet/Superconductor Interfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SZFINL3Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03994}
}
abstract

Spin-orbit coupling (SOC) emerging at the interfaces of superconducting magnetic tunnel junctions is at the heart of multiple unprecedented physical phenomena, covering triplet proximity effects induced by unconventional (spin-flip) Andreev reflections, giant transport magnetoanisotropies, sizable tunneling anomalous Hall effects, and electrically controlled current-reversing $ 0 $--$ \pi $(-like) transitions in Josephson contacts. Recent first-principles calculations proposed that the Rashba spin-orbit fields in twisted graphene/transition-metal dichalcogenide and van der Waals multilayers can -- owing to broken mirror symmetries -- exhibit an unconventional radial component (with spin parallel to the electron's momentum), which can be quantified by the Rashba angle $ \theta_\mathrm{R} $. We theoretically explore the ramifications of radial Rashba SOC at the interfaces of vertical ferromagnet/superconductor tunnel junctions with a focus on the magnetoanisotropies of the tunneling and tunneling-anomalous-Hall-effect conductances. Our results demonstrate that $ \theta_\mathrm{R} $ can be experimentally extracted from respective magnetization-angle shifts, providing a robust way to probe the radial Rashba SOC induced by twisted multilayers that are placed as tunneling barriers between ferromagnetic and superconducting electrodes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03994 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Calculated dependence of the tunneling conduc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Calculated dependence of the tunneling conduc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Calculated dependence of the tunneling conduc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Calculated tunneling-anomalous-Hall-effect (TAHE) con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Calculated tunneling-anomalous-Hall-effect (TAHE) con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Calculated dependence of the tunneling conduc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Calculated tunneling-anomalous-Hall-effect (TAHE) con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [48]

    Costa, A

    A. Costa, A. Matos-Abiague, and J. Fabian, Skew Andreev re- flection in ferromagnet/superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 100, 060507(R) (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [60]

    W.-H. Kang, M. Barth, A. Costa, A. Garcia-Ruiz, A. Mre ´nca- Kolasi´nska, M.-H. Liu, and D. Kochan, Magnetotransport and Spin-Relaxation Signatures of the Radial Rashba and Dressel- haus Spin-Orbit Coupling in Proximitized Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 216201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [1]

    ˇZuti´c, J

    I. ˇZuti´c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fundamentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  4. [2]

    Fabian, A

    J. Fabian, A. Matos-Abiague, C. Ertler, P. Stano, and I. ˇZuti´c, Semiconductor Spintronics, Acta Phys. Slovaca57, 565 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [3]

    Matos-Abiague and J

    A. Matos-Abiague and J. Fabian, Anisotropic tunneling magne- toresistance and tunneling anisotropic magnetoresistance: Spin- orbit coupling in magnetic tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. B 79, 155303 (2009)

    work page 2009

  6. [4]

    Matos-Abiague and J

    A. Matos-Abiague and J. Fabian, Tunneling Anomalous and Spin Hall Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 056602 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [5]

    H ¨ogl, A

    P. H ¨ogl, A. Matos-Abiague, I. ˇZuti´c, and J. Fabian, Magnetoanisotropic Andreev Reflection in Ferromagnet- Superconductor Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 116601 (2015); Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 159902(E) (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [6]

    Costa, P

    A. Costa, P. H ¨ogl, and J. Fabian, Magnetoanisotropic Joseph- son effect due to interfacial spin-orbit fields in superconduc- tor/ferromagnet/superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 95, 024514 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 80 references
  1. [7]

    Vezin, C

    T. Vezin, C. Shen, J. E. Han, and I. ˇZuti´c, Enhanced spin- triplet pairing in magnetic junctions with 𝑠-wave superconduc- tors, Phys. Rev. B101, 014515 (2020)

    2020

  2. [8]

    Mondal, R

    D. Mondal, R. Kumari, T. Nag, and A. Saha, Trans- port signatures of single and multiple Floquet Majorana modes in one-dimensional Rashba nanowire and Shiba chain, arXiv:2407.01135 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Oscillatory effects and the magnetic susceptibility of carriers in inversion layers, J. Phys. C 17, 6039 (1984)

    1984

  4. [10]

    Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.39, 66 (1984); JETP Lett. 39, 78 (1984)

    1984

  5. [11]

    Gmitra, A

    M. Gmitra, A. Matos-Abiague, C. Draxl, and J. Fabian, Mag- netic Control of Spin-Orbit Fields: A First-Principles Study of Fe/GaAs Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 036603 (2013)

    2013

  6. [12]

    Dresselhaus, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Zinc Blende Structures, Phys

    G. Dresselhaus, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Zinc Blende Structures, Phys. Rev.100, 580 (1955)

    1955

  7. [13]

    Moser, A

    J. Moser, A. Matos-Abiague, D. Schuh, W. Wegscheider, J. Fabian, and D. Weiss, Tunneling Anisotropic Magnetoresis- tance and Spin-Orbit Coupling in Fe/GaAs/Au Tunnel Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 056601 (2007)

    2007

  8. [14]

    V. V. Rylkov, S. N. Nikolaev, K. Y. Chernoglazov, V. A. Demin, A. V. Sitnikov, M. Y. Presnyakov, A. L. Vasiliev, N. S. Perov, A. S. Vedeneev, Y. E. Kalinin, V. V. Tugushev, and A. B. Gra- novsky, Tunneling anomalous Hall effect in nanogranular CoFe- B-Al-O films near the metal...

    2017

  9. [15]

    W. Han, R. K. Kawakami, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian, Graphene spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 794 (2014)

    2014

  10. [16]

    ˇZuti´c, A

    I. ˇZuti´c, A. Matos-Abiague, B. Scharf, H. Dery, and K. Be- lashchenko, Proximitized materials, Mater. Today22, 85 (2019)

    2019

  11. [17]

    Avsar, H

    A. Avsar, H. Ochoa, F. Guinea, B. ¨Ozyilmaz, B. J. van Wees, and I. J. Vera-Marun, Colloquium: Spintronics in graphene and other two-dimensional materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 021003 (2020)

    2020

  12. [18]

    J. F. Sierra, J. Fabian, R. K. Kawakami, S. Roche, and S. O. Valenzuela, Van der Waals heterostructures for spintronics and opto-spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 856 (2021)

    2021

  13. [19]

    D. T. Perkins and A. Ferreira, Spintronics in 2D graphene-based van der Waals heterostructures, in Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics, edited by T. Chakraborty (Academic Press, Ox- ford, 2024) pp. 205–222, 2nd ed

    2024

  14. [20]

    Gmitra, D

    M. Gmitra, D. Kochan, P. H ¨ogl, and J. Fabian, Trivial and inverted Dirac bands and the emergence of quantum spin Hall states in graphene on transition-metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B93, 155104 (2016)

    2016

  15. [21]

    Li and M

    Y. Li and M. Koshino, Twist-angle dependence of the proximity spin-orbit coupling in graphene on transition-metal dichalco- genides, Phys. Rev. B99, 075438 (2019)

    2019

  16. [22]

    David, P

    A. David, P. Rakyta, A. Korm ´anyos, and G. Burkard, In- duced spin-orbit coupling in twisted graphene–transition metal dichalcogenide heterobilayers: Twistronics meets spintronics, Phys. Rev. B100, 085412 (2019)

    2019

  17. [23]

    Naimer, K

    T. Naimer, K. Zollner, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian, Twist- angle dependent proximity induced spin-orbit coupling in graphene/transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 104, 195156 (2021); Phys. Rev. B 108, 039902 (2023)

    2021

  18. [24]

    C. G. P ´eterfalvi, A. David, P. Rakyta, G. Burkard, and A. Korm´anyos, Quantum interference tuning of spin-orbit cou- pling in twisted van der Waals trilayers, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L022049 (2022)

    2022

  19. [25]

    Veneri, D

    A. Veneri, D. T. S. Perkins, C. G. P ´eterfalvi, and A. Ferreira, Twist angle controlled collinear Edelstein effect in van der Waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B106, L081406 (2022)

    2022

  20. [26]

    S. Lee, D. J. P. de Sousa, Y.-K. Kwon, F. de Juan, Z. Chi, F. Casanova, and T. Low, Charge-to-spin conversion in twisted graphene/WSe2 heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 106, 165420 (2022)

    2022

  21. [27]

    Zollner, P

    K. Zollner, P. E. Faria Junior, and J. Fabian, Strong manipulation of the valley splitting upon twisting and gating in MoSe 2/CrI3 and WSe2/CrI3 van der Waals heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 107, 035112 (2023)

    2023

  22. [28]

    Naimer and J

    T. Naimer and J. Fabian, Twist-angle dependent proximity in- duced spin-orbit coupling in graphene/topological insulator het- erostructures, Phys. Rev. B107, 195144 (2023)

    2023

  23. [29]

    Zollner, S

    K. Zollner, S. M. Jo ˜ao, B. K. Nikoli ´c, and J. Fabian, Twist- and gate-tunable proximity spin-orbit coupling, spin relaxation anisotropy, and charge-to-spin conversion in heterostructures of graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 108, 235166 (2023)

    2023

  24. [30]

    Naimer, M

    T. Naimer, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian, Tuning proximity spin-orbit coupling in graphene/NbSe 2 heterostructures via twist angle, Phys. Rev. B109, 205109 (2024)

    2024

  25. [31]

    A. W. Cummings, J. H. Garcia, J. Fabian, and S. Roche, Giant Spin Lifetime Anisotropy in Graphene Induced by Proximity Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 206601 (2017)

    2017

  26. [32]

    T. S. Ghiasi, J. Ingla-Ayn ´es, A. A. Kaverzin, and B. J. van Wees, Large Proximity-Induced Spin Lifetime Anisotropy in Transition-Metal Dichalcogenide/Graphene Heterostructures, Nano Lett. 17, 7528 (2017)

    2017

  27. [33]

    Zihlmann, A

    S. Zihlmann, A. W. Cummings, J. H. Garcia, M. Kedves, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Sch ¨onenberger, and P. Makk, Large spin relaxation anisotropy and valley-Zeeman spin-orbit coupling in WSe2/graphene/ℎ-BN heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 97, 075434 (2018)

    2018

  28. [34]

    L. A. Ben ´ıtez, J. F. Sierra, W. S. Torres, A. Arrighi, F. Bonell, M. V. Costache, and S. O. Valenzuela, Strongly anisotropic spin relaxation in graphene–transition metal dichalcogenide het- erostructures at room temperature, Nat. Phys. 14, 303 (2018)

    2018

  29. [35]

    Menichetti, L

    G. Menichetti, L. Cavicchi, L. Lucchesi, F. Taddei, G. Ian- naccone, P. Jarillo-Herrero, C. Felser, F. H. L. Koppens, and M. Polini, Giant chirality-induced spin polarization in twisted 12 transition metal dichalcogenides, arXiv:2312.09169 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Frank, P

    T. Frank, P. E. F. Junior, K. Zollner, and J. Fabian, Emergence of radial Rashba spin-orbit fields in twisted van der Waals het- erostructures, Phys. Rev. B109, L241403 (2024)

    2024

  31. [37]

    Eschrig, Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics, Phys

    M. Eschrig, Spin-polarized supercurrents for spintronics, Phys. Today 64(1), 43 (2011)

    2011

  32. [38]

    Linder and J

    J. Linder and J. W. A. Robinson, Strong odd-frequency corre- lations in fully gapped Zeeman-split superconductors, Sci. Rep. 5, 15483 (2015)

    2015

  33. [39]

    F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Long-Range Proximity Effects in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 4096 (2001)

    2001

  34. [40]

    A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov, Odd Triplet Su- perconductivity in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Multilayered Structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 117006 (2003)

    2003

  35. [41]

    R. S. Keizer, S. T. B. Goennenwein, T. M. Klapwijk, G. Miao, G. Xiao, and A. Gupta, A spin triplet supercurrent through the half-metallic ferromagnet CrO2, Nature (London) 439, 825 (2006)

    2006

  36. [42]

    Halterman, P

    K. Halterman, P. H. Barsic, and O. T. Valls, Odd Triplet Pairing in Clean Superconductor/Ferromagnet Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 127002 (2007)

    2007

  37. [43]

    Eschrig and T

    M. Eschrig and T. L¨ofwander, Triplet supercurrents in clean and disordered half-metallic ferromagnets, Nat. Phys.4, 138 (2008)

    2008

  38. [44]

    Sun and N

    K. Sun and N. Shah, General framework for transport in spin- orbit-coupled superconducting heterostructures: Nonuniform spin-orbit coupling and spin-orbit-active interfaces, Phys. Rev. B 91, 144508 (2015)

    2015

  39. [45]

    Costa and J

    A. Costa and J. Fabian, Superconducting triplet pair- ings and anisotropic magnetoresistance effects in ferromag- net/superconductor/ferromagnet double-barrier junctions, Phys. Rev. B104, 174504 (2021)

    2021

  40. [46]

    S. H. Jacobsen, I. Kulagina, and J. Linder, Controlling super- conducting spin flow with spin-flip immunity using a single homogeneous ferromagnet, Sci. Rep. 6, 23926 (2016)

    2016

  41. [47]

    Mart ´ınez, P

    I. Mart ´ınez, P. H¨ogl, C. Gonz´alez-Ruano, J. P. Cascales, C. Tiu- san, Y. Lu, M. Hehn, A. Matos-Abiague, J. Fabian, I. ˇZuti´c, and F. G. Aliev, Interfacial Spin-Orbit Coupling: A Platform for Superconducting Spintronics, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 014030 (2020)

    2020

  42. [49]

    F. Ando, Y. Miyasaka, T. Li, J. Ishizuka, T. Arakawa, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, Y. Yanase, and T. Ono, Observation of supercon- ducting diode effect, Nature (London) 584, 373 (2020)

    2020

  43. [50]

    Baumgartner, L

    C. Baumgartner, L. Fuchs, A. Costa, S. Reinhardt, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, P. E. Faria Junior, D. Kochan, J. Fabian, N. Paradiso, and C. Strunk, Supercurrent rectification and magnetochiral effects in symmetric Josephson junctions, Nat. Nanotechnol...

    2022

  44. [51]

    Baumgartner, L

    C. Baumgartner, L. Fuchs, A. Costa, J. Pic ´o-Cort´es, S. Rein- hardt, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Man- fra, P. E. Faria Junior, D. Kochan, J. Fabian, N. Paradiso, and C. Strunk, Effect of Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit cou- pling on supercurrent rectifica...

    2022

  45. [52]

    Costa, C

    A. Costa, C. Baumgartner, S. Reinhardt, J. Berger, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, J. Fabian, D. Kochan, N. Paradiso, and C. Strunk, Sign reversal of the Josephson inductance magnetochiral anisotropy and 0– 𝜋-like transitions in supercurrent diodes, Nat. ...

    2023

  46. [53]

    Costa, J

    A. Costa, J. Fabian, and D. Kochan, Microscopic study of the Josephson supercurrent diode effect in Josephson junc- tions based on two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B108, 054522 (2023)

    2023

  47. [54]

    Banerjee, M

    A. Banerjee, M. Geier, M. A. Rahman, C. Thomas, T. Wang, M. J. Manfra, K. Flensberg, and C. M. Marcus, Phase Asym- metry of Andreev Spectra from Cooper-Pair Momentum, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 196301 (2023)

    2023

  48. [55]

    Kochan, A

    D. Kochan, A. Costa, I. Zhumagulov, and I. ˇZuti´c, Phenomeno- logical Theory of the Supercurrent Diode Effect: The Lifshitz Invariant, arXiv:2303.11975 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Enhanced Superconducting Diode Effect due to Coexisting Phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 046003 (2024)

    2024

  50. [57]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Altermagnetic superconducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B110, 024503 (2024)

    2024

  51. [58]

    Kokkeler, I

    T. Kokkeler, I. Tokatly, and F. S. Bergeret, Nonreciprocal su- perconducting transport and the spin Hall effect in gyrotropic structures, SciPost Phys. 16, 055 (2024)

    2024

  52. [59]

    Reinhardt, T

    S. Reinhardt, T. Ascherl, A. Costa, J. Berger, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, J. Fabian, D. Kochan, C. Strunk, and N. Paradiso, Link between supercurrent diode and anomalous Josephson effect revealed by gate-controlled in- terferometry, Nat. Commun. 15, ...

    2024

  53. [61]

    Scharf, D

    B. Scharf, D. Kochan, and A. Matos-Abiague, Superconducting diode effect in quantum spin Hall insulator based Josephson junctions, Phys. Rev. B110, 134511 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    Costa, O

    A. Costa, O. Kanehira, H. Matsueda, and J. Fabian, Unconven- tional Josephson Supercurrent Diode Effect Induced by Chiral Spin-Orbit Coupling, arXiv:2411.11570 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Daido, Y

    A. Daido, Y. Ikeda, and Y. Yanase, Intrinsic superconducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 037001 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    N. F. Q. Yuan and L. Fu, Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2119548119 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    J. J. He, Y. Tanaka, and N. Nagaosa, A phenomenological theory of superconductor diodes, New Journal of Physics 24, 053014 (2022)

    2022

  58. [66]

    Ili ´c and F

    S. Ili ´c and F. S. Bergeret, Theory of the Supercurrent Diode Ef- fect in Rashba Superconductors with Arbitrary Disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 177001 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Davydova, S

    M. Davydova, S. Prembabu, and L. Fu, Universal Josephson diode effect, Science Advances 8, eabo0309 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    P. G. De Gennes, Superconductivity of Metals and Alloys (Ad- dison Wesley, Redwood City, 1989)

    1989

  61. [69]

    Bonell, S

    F. Bonell, S. Andrieu, C. Tiusan, F. Montaigne, E. Snoeck, B. Belhadji, L. Calmels, F. Bertran, P. L. F `evre, and A. Taleb- Ibrahimi, Influence of misfit dislocations on the magnetoresis- tance of MgO-based epitaxial magnetic tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. B82, 092405 (2010)

    2010

  62. [70]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Random-matrix theory of quantum trans- port, Rev. Mod. Phys.69, 731 (1997)

    1997

  63. [71]

    G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk, Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting micro- constrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercur- rent conversion, Phys. Rev. B25, 4515 (1982)

    1982

  64. [72]

    For simplicity, the Hall-contact and interfacial cross-section ar- eas are assumed to be equal and denoted by𝐴

  65. [73]

    Costa and J

    A. Costa and J. Fabian, Anomalous Josephson Hall effect charge 13 and transverse spin currents in superconductor/ferromagnetic- insulator/superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104508 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    A. N. Chantis, K. D. Belashchenko, E. Y. Tsymbal, and M. van Schilfgaarde, Tunneling Anisotropic Magnetoresistance Driven by Resonant Surface States: First-Principles Calculations on an Fe(001) Surface, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 046601 (2007)

    2007

  67. [75]

    Tuero, C

    P. Tuero, C. Gonz´alez-Ruano, Y. Lu, C. Tiusan, and F. G. Aliev, Spin texture and spin-orbit coupling contributions in spin-triplet superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B110, 094504 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    Betthausen, T

    C. Betthausen, T. Dollinger, H. Saarikoski, V. Kolkovsky, G. Karczewski, T. Wojtowicz, K. Richter, and D. Weiss, Spin- Transistor Action via Tunable Landau-Zener Transitions, Sci- ence 337, 324 (2012)

    2012

  69. [77]

    Note that we generalized the formula for the in-plane magne- toanisotropic Andreev reflection stated in Ref. [5]. To obtain the maximal amplitudes of the magnetoanisotropy, the mag- netoanisotropic Andreev reflection needs to be computed with respect to𝐺 𝑧(𝜃,𝜃 R/2), which corr...

  70. [78]

    ˇZuti´c and O

    I. ˇZuti´c and O. T. Valls, Spin-polarized tunneling in ferromag- net/unconventional superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 60, 6320 (1999)

    1999

  71. [79]

    ˇZuti´c and O

    I. ˇZuti´c and O. T. Valls, Tunneling spectroscopy for ferromag- net/superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B 61, 1555 (2000); Phys. Rev. B61, 14845(E) (2000)

    2000

  72. [80]

    Furusaki and M

    A. Furusaki and M. Tsukada, Dc Josephson effect and Andreev reflection, Solid State Commun. 78, 299 (1991)

    1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.