Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 66 references

Traversable wormhole for string, but not for particle

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A string-theory wormhole lets chiral strings traverse while particles cannot.

desk verdict Clever chiral-string traversal idea, but the central claim is unsupported because the explicit string solutions have divergent worldsheet action and the displayed metric is internally inconsistent. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04128 v2 pith:NXKPS2FJ submitted 2024-12-05 hep-th gr-qc

Hun Jang , Minkyoo Kim , Hocheol Lee , Jeong-Hyuck Park This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc MSC 81T3083E30 PACS 04.20.Gz11.25.-w
keywords traversablewormholechiralstringdoublefieldtheorynon-RiemanniangeometryNS-NSgravityH-fluxdilatongeodesiccompleteness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs a Lorentzian wormhole from the massless NS-NS fields of string theory—metric, B-field, and dilaton—with no additional matter, and claims that while point particles cannot pass through it, a special class of 'chiral' strings can traverse it freely in finite worldsheet time. The geometry has three regions: two asymptotically flat exteriors and a middle throat region, separated by two spheres where the metric degenerates; in double field theory these are regular 'non-Riemannian' surfaces where a string loses its left-right pairing. The authors show that null geodesics are complete within each region and cannot cross the separating spheres, whereas explicit chiral string solutions solve the equations of motion and cross the spheres. The result matters because wormhole traversability in string theory is usually analyzed with point-particle geodesics, and this example says that probe choice changes the answer.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the chiral string sector of the worldsheet theory, isolated by reducing the full string equations in conformal gauge to radial motion with constant angles. For the wormhole metric, the combination $G(y) = \int dy/F(y)$ obeys $\partial_+\partial_- G = 0$ for ordinary strings, and since $G$ diverges logarithmically at $y=b_\pm$, those strings can only reach the non-Riemannian spheres in the infinite-past or infinite-future limit. In the chiral sector, by contrast, the Virasoro constraints force $\partial_+ y = \pm \partial_+ t$ and $\partial_- y = \mp \partial_- t$, which turns the second-order equation into $\partial_+\partial_- y = 0$, so $y$ and $t$ decompose into pure left- and right-movers; the $y$-coordinate then has a term linear in worldsheet time, $y = 2\alpha' p\, \tau + f_+(\sigma_+) + f_- (\sigma_-)$, which crosses any finite value, including $b_\pm$, in finite $\tau$. This is the mechanism: the non-Riemannian boundaries are transparent to chiral strings because the worldsheet zero mode is not trapped by the diverging $G(y)$.

What would settle it

Compute the on-shell worldsheet action (or its density) for the traversing chiral solutions (39)-(41) as the worldsheet crosses $y=b_\pm$. If the action diverges and no regulator removes the divergence, the classical solution is not a valid string state and the traversal claim fails. A second decisive check is whether the $p\neq 0$ chiral solution (39) can satisfy closed-string periodicity in both $y$ and $t$; the paper itself notes that periodicity forces $p=0$, so a non-periodic traversing solution would need a different physical interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a two-parameter family of solutions to the low-energy string equations, written in the string frame as $ds^2 = -dt^2 + dy^2/F(y) + R(y)^2(d\vartheta^2 + \sin^2\vartheta\, d\varphi^2)$, with $H$-flux $H = h\sin\vartheta\, dt\wedge d\vartheta\wedge d\varphi$ and dilaton $e^{2\phi} = 1/|F(y)|$. Here $F(y) = (y-b_-)(y-b_+)/(y^2 + h^2/4)$ and $R(y) = \sqrt{y^2 + h^2/4}$, so for $b>0$ and $|h|\le |b|$ the function $F$ vanishes at two points $y=b_\pm$, marking the boundaries of the throat. The paper argues that these boundaries are curvature singularities of Riemannian geometry but perfectly regular in double field theory, where the generalized metric and $O(D,D)$-invariant fields are finite; they are 'non-Riemannian spheres' on which strings become chiral. The main claim is that all null geodesics are confined to one of the three regions—the effective potential has two positive peaks for nonzero angular momentum and the affine parameter diverges for radial geodesics—whereas chiral string solutions, satisfying $\partial_+ y = \pm \partial_+ t$ and $\partial_- y = \mp \partial_- t$, solve the string equations and Virasoro constraints and pass through the spheres. The most explicit traversing solution is the ellipsoidal string $y = 2b\cos\tau\sin\sigma$, $t = 2b\sin\tau\cos\sigma$, which wraps the wormhole and crosses it, together with the pointlike chiral trajectory $y = \pm t = \alpha' p\, \sigma_+ + f_+(\sigma_+)$.

Load-bearing premise

The traversal claim assumes that a solution of the classical string equations of motion and Virasoro constraints is enough to qualify as a physical string configuration, without verifying that the worldsheet action is finite on the surfaces $y=b_\pm$; for the explicit closed-string solution (41), the action density $G_{\mu\nu}\partial_+ X^\mu \partial_- X^\nu$ diverges logarithmically as $F(y)\to 0$, and the $p\neq 0$ solutions are not periodic in target time.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Point-particle geodesics are not the right diagnostic for wormhole traversability in string theory; at minimum, chiral strings probe the geometry in a qualitatively different way.
  • The wormhole is a regular solution of double field theory despite being singular in ordinary Riemannian gravity, so the 'singular spheres' are better understood as transitions to a non-Riemannian phase.
  • A traversable wormhole can be supported by pure NS-NS fields, with the dilaton's negative kinetic term in the string frame providing the effective energy-condition violation; no exotic matter is introduced.
  • If an ordinary string approaches the wormhole, it may split into chiral and anti-chiral pieces that traverse and recombine on the other side—this is the authors' explicit conjecture and would give a physical mechanism for stringy traversal.
  • The traversing solutions are independent of the precise form of $F(y)$, suggesting the chiral-string traversal mechanism may persist for other non-Riemannian boundary geometries (a direct corollary of eq. (39)).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the on-shell worldsheet action for the ellipsoidal solution (41) is computed, it diverges logarithmically as the string crosses $y=b_\pm$; whether a regulator exists may determine whether the classical traversal survives quantization.
  • The split-and-recombine conjecture could be tested by constructing worldsheet solutions that interpolate between the non-chiral and chiral sectors across the wormhole, for example by adding a perturbation that couples left- and right-movers.
  • Because the chiral string sees the non-Riemannian spheres as transparent while particles see a barrier, the wormhole offers a concrete laboratory for the double-field-theory idea that the Riemannian metric is not fundamental; the throat region's $O(D,D)$-invariant volume is a clean observable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a four-dimensional, NS-NS wormhole geometry depending on two parameters (b and h) and claims that, although point-particle geodesics are complete but non-traversable across the three regions separated by the surfaces y=b±, a chiral string can traverse the wormhole freely. The background is presented as a solution of the low-energy string effective action, with the surfaces y=b± argued to be regular in double field theory (DFT) despite being Riemannian curvature singularities. The traversal claim is based on explicit solutions (39)-(41) of a reduced string equation of motion for radial motion. The manuscript concludes that wormhole traversability in string theory cannot be assessed from point-particle geodesics alone.

Significance. If correct, the paper would provide a concrete example in which stringy probes access spacetime regions that are inaccessible to point particles, with the transition through degenerate surfaces attributed to non-Riemannian, DFT-regular geometry. This would be a conceptually interesting and potentially influential result for the study of string propagation in singular backgrounds. The manuscript is compact and clearly written, and it builds on previous work of the same group (Refs. [51,52]) that identified Riemannian singularities with regular non-Riemannian geometry. The main strength is the explicit closed-form string solutions in a nontrivial background, and the paper honestly acknowledges that the construction leaves the internal compactification and holographic interpretation open. However, as detailed below, the central traversal claim is not supported because the proposed string solutions have divergent worldsheet action at the degenerate surfaces, and because the metric used in the derivation is inconsistent with the metric displayed in Eq. (4).

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Eq. (4) vs. Eqs. (10), (21), (25), (28)] The displayed metric (4) has g_tt = -1 and g_yy = 1/F(y), but later equations use g_tt = -1/F consistently: the embedding (10) has -dt^2/F, the inverse metric in (21) has g^{tt} = -F, the geodesic equation (25) gives dot t = E F(y) rather than dot t = E, and the string equation (28) contains ∂_±(∂_∓ t / F(y)). These are mutually incompatible with (4). If the intended metric is ds^2 = (-dt^2 + dy^2)/F(y) + R(y)^2 dΩ^2, then Eq. (4) must be corrected, and the discussion of the coordinate range in the middle region changes accordingly. As printed, the derivation of the string equations and the geodesic analysis is not grounded in the displayed background.
  2. [Traversable by not Particle but String, after Eq. (39)] The claimed traversing chiral-string solutions are never shown to define a finite worldsheet action. With the metric used in (28), the conformal-gauge action density is G_μν ∂_+X^μ ∂_-X^ν = (1/F)(∂_+y ∂_-y - ∂_+t ∂_-t), which under the opposite-sign condition (37) equals -2∂_+t ∂_-t / F. For the explicit closed-string example (41), ∂_+t ∂_-t is generically nonvanishing at the worldsheet points where y = b±, while F has a simple zero there; the action density therefore diverges as 1/(y-b±) and the integrated action diverges logarithmically. The reduction leading to (38) divides by F and is valid only in the three regions with F≠0; no junction condition or limiting procedure is given for crossing y=b±. Thus the assertion that (39) or (41) describes a physical string traversing the wormhole is not established.
  3. [Conclusion, last paragraph] The conclusion states that the traversing chiral-string solution 'transcends the specific details of the wormhole geometry' and that it 'supports the interpretation of the points y=b± as DFT regularity rather than GR singularity.' This inference relies on the validity of the Riemannian sigma-model equations (26)-(29) at the very points where the metric is degenerate. Since the worldsheet action diverges there, the proposed solutions do not justify the conclusion that string theory makes the wormhole traversable; at most they are formal bulk solutions in the three F≠0 regions. The manuscript therefore does not bridge the gap between bulk EOM validity and a finite physical string configuration.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title and headings] The title 'Traversable wormhole for string, but not for particle' is grammatically awkward; 'for a string' or 'for strings' would read better. The heading 'NS–NS Wine-Glass W ormhole' contains an accidental space.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption writes 'J ±' where the standard notation is 'J^±'; this should be fixed for clarity.
  3. [Eq. (12)] The explicit expression for the third sign-change point is displayed heavily in terms of b_± and h; it would help readers if the authors noted that this point lies outside the interval [b_+, b_-] for generic parameters, or if they gave a numerical example.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the chiral-string traversal is derived from the standard sigma-model EOM and is not fitted or defined into existence.

full rationale

The load-bearing traversal claim rests on the derivation from (26) through the sign choice (37) to the explicit solution (39). The calculation is self-contained: (38) gives ∂+∂−y = 0 after the chiral sign choice, and (39) solves it, so the conclusion that y sweeps through the wormhole coordinate is a consequence of the equations rather than an input. No parameter is fitted to the claimed outcome, and no equation defines the traversal quantity in terms of itself. The background solution is inherited from [50,51] and the DFT-regularity language from [52], both involving overlapping authorship for [51,52]; however, the paper displays the explicit F-cancellation in (21)-(22) rather than relying on the citation for the key regularity step, and the independent external source [50] supports the solution family. The assertion that a chiral string crosses y = b± without checking finiteness of the sigma-model action is a physical-validity gap, not a circular reduction: there is no quoted equation in which the result equals its input by construction. Self-citations are present but not load-bearing in the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the cited background solution and the DFT-regularity interpretation, both from the same research group, plus the assumption that string EOM are valid through the degeneracies. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • b = non-zero real
    Integration parameter of the wormhole family (eqs 5-6); the traversability argument holds for any b≠0 with |h|≤|b|, so it is not tuned to force the result.
  • h = real with |h|≤|b|
    Electric H-flux parameter; sets the throat radius R(0)=|h|/2. It is a free parameter of the known solution family, not fitted to data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The NS-NS low-energy effective action (eq 1) with metric, B-field, and dilaton is the correct leading-α' string gravity action.
    The entire analysis is performed in this action; no α' corrections are included.
  • domain assumption Four-dimensional spacetime is obtained from ten-dimensional superstring theory by Ricci-flat compactification.
    The paper states this implicitly: 'implicitly leaving the detailed treatment of compactified internal dimensions aside'.
  • domain assumption The background (4)-(5) solves the equations of motion (2), as established in [50,51].
    The paper cites prior work rather than re-deriving the solution; the two-parameter family is a subset of those solutions.
  • domain assumption Double field theory resolves the Riemannian singularities at y=b± as regular non-Riemannian points.
    Imported from [52] by the same group; used to argue the singularities are coordinate artifacts.
  • ad hoc to paper The standard string sigma-model equations (26) remain valid across the degenerate surfaces y=b±.
    The paper applies (26) at points where g_yy and g_tt diverge; no regularization of the worldsheet action at those points is given. This is the load-bearing premise of the traversal claim.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Traversable wormhole for string, but not for particle." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NXKPS2FJ

@misc{pith2026241204128,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Traversable wormhole for string, but not for particle},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NXKPS2FJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04128}
}
abstract

We propose a Lorentzian wormhole geometry characterized by a closed string massless sector with nontrivial $H$-flux and a scalar dilaton. In the string frame, the dilaton exhibits a negative kinetic term, enabling the existence of the wormhole. The geometry consists of three distinct regions. The middle region contains the throat, and its boundaries with the other two regions form non-Riemannian two-spheres, where a fundamental string becomes chiral, akin to a non-relativistic string. While point-particle geodesics are complete within each region and non-traversable across regions, strings perceive the geometry differently, allowing a chiral string to traverse freely.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04128 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Asymmetric, ‘wine-glass’ shaped wormhole in an am [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Penrose Diagram of the Wormhole Geometry for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Effective potential for null geodesics ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A New Approach to String Quantization in Curved Space-Times,

    H. J. de Vega and N. G. Sanchez, “A New Approach to String Quantization in Curved Space-Times,” Phys. Lett. B 197 (1987), 320-326 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90392-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90392-3 1987

  2. [2]

    Quantization of the Mass of a Black Hole in String Theory,

    Y. I. Kogan, “Quantization of the Mass of a Black Hole in String Theory,” JETP Lett. 44, 267-270 (1986)

    work page 1986

  3. [3]

    Comments on cosmological singularities in string theory,

    M. Berkooz, B. Craps, D. Kutasov and G. Ra- jesh, “Comments on cosmological singularities in string theory,” JHEP 03 (2003), 031 doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2003/03/031 [arXiv:hep-th/0212215 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    Giant Magnons,

    D. M. Hofman and J. M. Maldacena, “Giant Magnons,” J. Phys. A 39 (2006), 13095-13118 doi:10.1088/0305- 4470/39/41/S17 [arXiv:hep-th/0604135 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations,

    L. Mason and D. Skinner, “Ambitwistor strings and the scattering equations,” JHEP 07 (2014), 048 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)048 [arXiv:1311.2564 [hep- th]]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Nonrelativistic closed string theory,

    J. Gomis and H. Ooguri, “Nonrelativistic closed string theory,” J. Math. Phys. 42 (2001), 3127-3151 doi:10.1063/1.1372697 [arXiv:hep-th/0009181 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    IIA/B, wound and wrapped,

    U. H. Danielsson, A. Guijosa and M. Kruczenski, “IIA/B, wound and wrapped,” JHEP 10 (2000), 020 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/10/020 [arXiv:hep- th/0009182 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2000

  8. [8]

    Non- relativistic superstrings: A New soluble sector of AdS(5) × S5,

    J. Gomis, J. Gomis and K. Kamimura, “Non- relativistic superstrings: A New soluble sector of AdS(5) × S5,” JHEP 12 (2005), 024 doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2005/12/024 [arXiv:hep-th/0507036 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2005

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Torsional Newton-Cartan Geometry and Lif- shitz Holography,

    M. H. Christensen, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and B. Rollier, “Torsional Newton-Cartan Geometry and Lif- shitz Holography,” Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014), 061901(R) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.061901 [arXiv:1311.4794 [hep- th]]

    2014 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz gravity from dynamical Newton-Cartan geometry,

    J. Hartong and N. A. Obers, “Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz gravity from dynamical Newton-Cartan geometry,” JHEP 07 (2015), 155 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)155 [arXiv:1504.07461 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Nonrel- ativistic strings and limits of the AdS/CFT corre- spondence,

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong and N. A. Obers, “Nonrel- ativistic strings and limits of the AdS/CFT corre- spondence,” Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.8, 086019 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.086019 [arXiv:1705.03535 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Strings with Non-Relativistic Conformal Sym- metry and Limits of the AdS/CFT Correspondence,

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, L. Menculini, N. A. Obers and Z. Yan, “Strings with Non-Relativistic Conformal Sym- metry and Limits of the AdS/CFT Correspondence,” JHEP 11 (2018), 190 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)190 [arXiv:1810.05560 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Nonrelativistic String Theory and T-Duality,

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis and Z. Yan, “Nonrelativistic String Theory and T-Duality,” JHEP 11 (2018), 133 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)133 [arXiv:1806.06071 [hep- th]]. 8

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    String Theory and String Newton- Cartan Geometry,

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, J. Rosseel, C. S ¸im¸ sek and Z. Yan, “String Theory and String Newton- Cartan Geometry,” J. Phys. A 53 (2020) no.1, 014001 doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab56e9 [arXiv:1907.10668 [hep- th]]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Relating non-relativistic string theories,

    T. Harmark, J. Hartong, L. Menculini, N. A. Obers and G. Oling, “Relating non-relativistic string theories,” JHEP 11 (2019), 071 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2019)071 [arXiv:1907.01663 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    A Non-Relativistic Limit of NS-NS Gravity,

    E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Lahnsteiner, L. Romano, J. Rosseel and C. S ¸im¸ sek, “A Non-Relativistic Limit of NS-NS Gravity,” [arXiv:2102.06974 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Aspects of Nonrelativis- tic Strings,

    G. Oling and Z. Yan, “Aspects of Nonrelativis- tic Strings,” Front. in Phys. 10 (2022), 832271 doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.832271 [arXiv:2202.12698 [hep- th]]

    2022

  10. [18]

    Review on Non- Relativistic Gravity,

    J. Hartong, N. A. Obers and G. Oling, “Review on Non- Relativistic Gravity,” Front. in Phys.11 (2023), 1116888 doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1116888 [arXiv:2212.11309 [gr- qc]]

    2023

  11. [19]

    String Theory and non- Riemannian Geometry,

    J. H. Park and S. Sugimoto, “String Theory and non- Riemannian Geometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) no.21, 211601 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.211601 [arXiv:2008.03084 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Non- Riemannian geometry of M-theory,

    D. S. Berman, C. D. A. Blair and R. Otsuki, “Non- Riemannian geometry of M-theory,” JHEP 07 (2019), 175 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)175 [arXiv:1902.01867 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Gravi- tation,

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne and J. A. Wheeler, “Gravi- tation,” W. H. Freeman, 1973, ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0, 978-0-691-17779-3

    1973

  14. [22]

    H branes and chiral strings,

    I. I. Kogan and N. B. B. Reis, “H branes and chiral strings,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16 (2001), 4567-4590 doi:10.1142/S0217751X01005389 [arXiv:hep-th/0107163 [hep-th]]

    2001 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Beitrage zur Einsteinschen Gravitationsthe- orie,

    L. Flamm, “Beitrage zur Einsteinschen Gravitationsthe- orie,” Phys.Z. 17 (1916) 448

    1916

  16. [24]

    The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity,

    A. Einstein and N. Rosen, “The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity,” Phys. Rev. 48 (1935), 73- 77 doi:10.1103/PhysRev.48.73

    1935 doi

  17. [25]

    Classical physics as geometry: Gravitation, electromagnetism, unquantized charge, and mass as properties of curved empty space,

    C. W. Misner and J. A. Wheeler, “Classical physics as geometry: Gravitation, electromagnetism, unquantized charge, and mass as properties of curved empty space,” Annals Phys. 2 (1957), 525-603 doi:10.1016/0003- 4916(57)90049-0

    1957 doi

  18. [26]

    Wormholes in space- time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teach- ing general relativity,

    M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, “Wormholes in space- time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teach- ing general relativity,” Am. J. Phys. 56 (1988), 395-412 doi:10.1119/1.15620

    1988 doi

  19. [27]

    Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition,

    M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne and U. Yurtsever, “Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988), 1446-1449 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1446

    1988 doi

  20. [28]

    STRING WORMHOLES,

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger, “STRING WORMHOLES,” Phys. Lett. B 230 (1989), 46-51 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)91651-1

    1989 doi

  21. [29]

    Lorentzian wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking,

    M. Visser, “Lorentzian wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking,” (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1995)

    1995

  22. [30]

    The Traversable wormhole with classical scalar fields,

    S. W. Kim and S. P. Kim, “The Traversable wormhole with classical scalar fields,” Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998), 087703 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.087703 [arXiv:gr-qc/9907012 [gr-qc]]

    1998 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Visualizing Interstellar’s Wormhole,

    O. James, E. von Tunzelmann, P. Franklin and K. S. Thorne, “Visualizing Interstellar’s Wormhole,” Am. J. Phys. 83 (2015), 486 doi:10.1119/1.4916949 [arXiv:1502.03809 [gr-qc]]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Wormholes, Warp Drives and En- ergy Conditions,

    F. S. N. Lobo, “Wormholes, Warp Drives and En- ergy Conditions,” Fundam. Theor. Phys. 189 (2017), pp.-279 Springer, 2017, ISBN 978-3-319-55181-4, 978- 3-319-85588-2, 978-3-319-55182-1 doi:10.1007/978-3-319- 55182-1 [arXiv:2103.05610 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Traversable Wormholes via a Double Trace Deformation,

    P. Gao, D. L. Jafferis and A. C. Wall, “Traversable Wormholes via a Double Trace Deformation,” JHEP 12 (2017), 151 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2017)151 [arXiv:1608.05687 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Observing a Worm- hole,

    D. C. Dai and D. Stojkovic, “Observing a Worm- hole,” Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.8, 083513 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.083513 [arXiv:1910.00429 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    General relativistic Poynting-Robertson ef- fect to diagnose wormholes existence: static and spherically symmetric case,

    V. De Falco, E. Battista, S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, “General relativistic Poynting-Robertson ef- fect to diagnose wormholes existence: static and spherically symmetric case,” Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) no.10, 104037 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.104037 [arXiv:2004.14849 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Cool horizons for en- tangled black holes,

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “Cool horizons for en- tangled black holes,” Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013), 781-811 doi:10.1002/prop.201300020 [arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Traversable wormholes in four dimensions,

    J. Maldacena, A. Milekhin and F. Popov, “Traversable wormholes in four dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav. 40 (2023) no.15, 155016 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acde30 [arXiv:1807.04726 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Humanly traversable wormholes,

    J. Maldacena and A. Milekhin, “Humanly traversable wormholes,” Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) no.6, 066007 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.066007 [arXiv:2008.06618 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Two vierbein formalism for string inspired axionic gravity,

    W. Siegel, “Two vierbein formalism for string inspired axionic gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 5453 [hep- th/9302036]

    1993

  32. [40]

    Superspace duality in low-energy super- strings,

    W. Siegel, “Superspace duality in low-energy super- strings,” Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2826 [hep-th/9305073]

    1993 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Double Field Theory,

    C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, “Double Field Theory,” JHEP 0909 (2009) 099 [arXiv:0904.4664 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  34. [42]

    The Gauge algebra of double field theory and Courant brackets,

    C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, “The Gauge algebra of double field theory and Courant brackets,” JHEP 0909 (2009) 090 [arXiv:0908.1792 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Background in- dependent action for double field theory,

    O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, “Background in- dependent action for double field theory,” JHEP 1007 (2010) 016 [arXiv:1003.5027 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Generalized metric formulation of double field theory,

    O. Hohm, C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, “Generalized metric formulation of double field theory,” JHEP 08 (2010), 008 [arXiv:1006.4823 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Differential geometry with a projection: Application to double field theory,

    I. Jeon, K. Lee and J. H. Park, “Differential geometry with a projection: Application to double field theory,” JHEP 1104 (2011) 014 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2011)014 [arXiv:1011.1324 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Stringy differential geom- etry, beyond Riemann,

    I. Jeon, K. Lee and J. H. Park, “Stringy differential geom- etry, beyond Riemann,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 044022 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.044022 [arXiv:1105.6294 [hep- th]]

    2011 arXiv

  39. [47]

    O(D, D) covariant Noether currents and global charges in double field theory,

    J. H. Park, S. J. Rey, W. Rim and Y. Sakatani, “O(D, D) covariant Noether currents and global charges in double field theory,” JHEP 11 (2015), 131 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)131 [arXiv:1507.07545 [hep- th]]. 9

    2015 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Einstein Double Field Equations,

    S. Angus, K. Cho and J. H. Park, “Einstein Double Field Equations,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) no.6, 500 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5982-y [arXiv:1804.00964 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Gravitational Core of Double Field Theory: Lecture Notes,

    J. H. Park, “Gravitational Core of Double Field Theory: Lecture Notes,” [arXiv:2505.10163 [gr-qc]]

  42. [50]

    On spher- ically symmetric string solutions in four-dimensions,

    C. P. Burgess, R. C. Myers and F. Quevedo, “On spher- ically symmetric string solutions in four-dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 442 (1995), 75-96 doi:10.1016/S0550- 3213(95)00090-9 [arXiv:hep-th/9410142 [hep-th]]

    1995 arXiv

  43. [51]

    The rotation curve of a point particle in stringy gravity,

    S. M. Ko, J. H. Park and M. Suh, “The rotation curve of a point particle in stringy gravity,” JCAP 06 (2017), 002 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/06/002 [arXiv:1606.09307 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Identifying Rie- mannian Singularities with Regular Non-Riemannian Ge- ometry,

    K. Morand, J. H. Park and M. Park, “Identifying Rie- mannian Singularities with Regular Non-Riemannian Ge- ometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022) no.4, 041602 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.041602 [arXiv:2106.01758 [hep-th]]. In comparison to our y, r[52] = y − b−

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Covariant action for a string in

    K. Lee and J. H. Park, “Covariant action for a string in ”doubled yet gauged” spacetime,” Nucl. Phys. B 880 (2014), 134-154 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.01.003 [arXiv:1307.8377 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Classification of non- Riemannian doubled-yet-gauged spacetime,

    K. Morand and J. H. Park, “Classification of non- Riemannian doubled-yet-gauged spacetime,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) no.10, 685 [erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) no.11, 901] doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5257- z [arXiv:1707.03713 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Dynamics of Perturbations in Double Field Theory & Non-Relativistic String Theory,

    S. M. Ko, C. Melby-Thompson, R. Meyer and J. H. Park, “Dynamics of Perturbations in Double Field Theory & Non-Relativistic String Theory,” JHEP 12 (2015), 144 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2015)144 [arXiv:1508.01121 [hep- th]]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Green-Schwarz superstring on doubled- yet-gauged spacetime,

    J. H. Park, “Green-Schwarz superstring on doubled- yet-gauged spacetime,” JHEP 11 (2016), 005 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2016)005 [arXiv:1609.04265 [hep- th]]

    2016 arXiv

  49. [57]

    A worldsheet supersymmet- ric Newton-Cartan string,

    C. D. A. Blair, “A worldsheet supersymmet- ric Newton-Cartan string,” JHEP 10 (2019), 266 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)266 [arXiv:1908.00074 [hep- th]]

    2019 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Remarks on the non-Riemannian sector in Double Field Theory,

    K. Cho and J. H. Park, “Remarks on the non-Riemannian sector in Double Field Theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) no.2, 101 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7648-9 [arXiv:1909.10711 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Derivation of the Null Energy Condition,

    M. Parikh and J. P. van der Schaar, “Derivation of the Null Energy Condition,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) no.8, 084002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.084002 [arXiv:1406.5163 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Wormholes in string theory,

    D. N. Vollick, “Wormholes in string theory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999), 1599-1604 doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/16/5/309 [arXiv:gr-qc/9806096 [gr-qc]]

    1999 arXiv

  53. [61]

    O(D, D) completion of the Friedmann equations,

    S. Angus, K. Cho, G. Franzmann, S. Muko- hyama and J. H. Park, “ O(D, D) completion of the Friedmann equations,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) no.9, 830 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8379-7 [arXiv:1905.03620 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [62]

    SUPER- STRING THEORY. VOL. 1: INTRODUCTION,

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz and E. Witten, “SUPER- STRING THEORY. VOL. 1: INTRODUCTION,” 1988, ISBN 978-0-521-35752-4

    1988

  55. [63]

    Asymmetrically twisted strings,

    R. L. Jusinskas, “Asymmetrically twisted strings,” Phys. Lett. B 829 (2022), 137090 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137090 [arXiv:2108.13426 [hep-th]]

    2022

  56. [64]

    Chiral string theories as an interpolation between strings and particles,

    M. L. Lize, B. Lyu, W. Siegel and Y. P. Wang, “Chiral string theories as an interpolation between strings and particles,” [arXiv:2109.10401 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  57. [65]

    Van Raamsdonk, Gen

    M. Van Raamsdonk, Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010), 2323- 2329 doi:10.1142/S0218271810018529 [arXiv:1005.3035 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Entanglement is not enough,

    L. Susskind, “Entanglement is not enough,” Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016), 49-71, doi:10.1002/prop.201500095 [arXiv:1411.0690 [hep- th]]

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.