Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Quench dynamics of entanglement from crosscap states

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quenches from crosscap states give opposite entanglement signatures in integrable and chaotic systems.

desk verdict The free-fermion core is solid and the circuit results are genuinely new, but the Hamiltonian section substitutes a single Gaussian component for the advertised crosscap state, leaving the central quantitative claim about crosscap-state quenches unsupported. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04187 v2 pith:74SCNERR submitted 2024-12-05 cond-mat.stat-mech quant-ph

Konstantinos Chalas , Pasquale Calabrese , Colin Rylands This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechquant-ph MSC 81P4082B2382B10 PACS 05.30.-d03.67.Mn05.45.Mt
keywords crosscapstatesquenchdynamicsentanglemententropymutualinformationquasiparticlepicturemembraneintegrablesystemsXXZmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens to entanglement after a quench from a state with long-range correlations, specifically crosscap states in which antipodal points of a periodic chain are prepared in maximally entangled pairs. It establishes that the answer divides cleanly by integrability: in integrable systems the block entanglement stays maximal for a delay time, then falls linearly and revives periodically, while in chaotic systems it stays constant; the mutual information between a block and its antipodal mirror falls linearly in both and revives only in integrable systems. The paper derives a quantitative quasiparticle formula for the free-fermion entropy, checks it against exact numerics, and extends the picture to the interacting integrable chain using thermodynamic Bethe ansatz data, while circuit results are explained through the entanglement membrane picture. If the paper is right, crosscap states turn entanglement dynamics into a sharp integrability detector and show how long-range initial correlations alter the standard growth rules.

What carries the argument

The central object is the crosscap state $|C\rangle$, a translation-invariant state of $2L$ qudits in which each site $x$ is maximally entangled with its antipode $x+L$, so that any local block looks like the infinite-temperature state while global correlations are maximal. The argument runs through two effective descriptions modified for long-range initial correlations: the quasiparticle picture, where the counting function $\max(0,2\ell-|2\tau_k v(k)-L|)$ with folded time $\tau_k=t\bmod L/|v(k)|$ counts antipodally correlated pairs entering a block only after a delay, and the entanglement membrane picture, where the maximally entangled initial state makes membrane termination on the lower boundary costly, with the cost cancelled exactly for membranes ending at diametrically opposite points. In the interacting integrable model these inputs are replaced by species-resolved Bethe-ansatz data: each bound-state species $m$ contributes its own counting function with velocity $v_m(\lambda)$ and entropy weight $s_m$.

What would settle it

Evolve the exact spin-chain crosscap state $|C\rangle=2^{-L/2}\bigotimes_{x=1}^{L}(|0\rangle_x|0\rangle_{x+L}+|1\rangle_x|1\rangle_{x+L})$ under the free-fermion Hamiltonian without replacing it by a single Gaussian component, and compare the computed block entropy with Eq. (3.18) at sizes such as $2L=400$, $2\ell=140$; any deviation beyond the stationary-phase error would falsify the claim that the Gaussian-component dynamics describes the crosscap quench.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a quench from a crosscap state produces two qualitatively different entanglement histories depending on whether the dynamics is integrable or chaotic. In integrable systems the Rényi entanglement entropy $S_A^{(n)}(t)$ of a contiguous block of length $2\ell$ remains pinned at its maximal value $2\ell\log q$ until the delay time $(L-2\ell)/4$, then decreases linearly in time and goes through periodic revivals; in chaotic systems it remains constant at the maximal value. The mutual information $I_{A:A_M}(t)$ between the block and its mirror-image block behaves as a complementary probe: it decreases linearly from the start in both classes, vanishes permanently under chaotic dynamics, and undergoes revivals under integrable dynamics. For free fermions the paper derives the explicit prediction $$S_A(t)=2\ell\log 2-2\log2\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\frac{dk}{2\pi}\max\left(0,2\ell-|2\tau_k v(k)-L|\right),\qquad \tau_k=t \bmod \frac{L}{|v(k)|},$$ and verifies it against exact numerics, then generalizes the counting-function structure to interacting integrable models through a sum over Bethe-ansatz quasiparticle species.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the full spin-chain crosscap state, which after the Jordan-Wigner transformation is a superposition of two free-fermion components, behaves like the single one of those components that the paper actually evolves; if the discarded component changes the entanglement, the paper's quantitative spin-chain predictions do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For integrable dynamics, $S_A^{(n)}(t)$ stays at its maximal value $2\ell\log q$ until $t=(L-2\ell)/4$, then decreases linearly and revives periodically; for chaotic circuits it remains constant.
  • The mutual information between a block and its antipodal mirror decreases linearly at early times in both classes, vanishes permanently under chaotic dynamics, and revives under integrable dynamics.
  • The free-fermion entropy is fixed quantitatively by Eq. (3.18), and the same quasiparticle counting structure, summed over Bethe-ansatz species, controls the interacting integrable chain.
  • Time-averaged entanglement from these states has a Page-curve-like dependence on subsystem size, given by Eq. (3.20).
  • The modified membrane picture predicts constant entropy and vanishing mutual information for chaotic circuits at large local Hilbert space dimension.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the membrane-picture mechanism implies that in chaotic systems the antipodal mutual information is a sharper scrambling diagnostic than single-block entropy, because entropy is frozen at its maximal value while mutual information decays and stays zero; the paper does not frame it this way.
  • Editorial inference: because the spin-chain crosscap state is a superposition of two Gaussian components, interference between them could alter the free-fermion prediction; testing the full state numerically is a direct way to see whether the discarded component is genuinely harmless.
  • Editorial inference: the delay time $(L-2\ell)/4$ and revival period $L/|v(k)|$ are concrete signatures that could be sought in quantum simulators that prepare antipodal Bell pairs, and the revival pattern would serve as an experimental integrability marker.
  • Editorial inference: generalizing the construction to entanglement between more than two distant sites would replace pair counting with multiplet counting and likely produce multiple delay times rather than one; the paper lists this as a natural next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the quench dynamics of the bipartite Rényi entropy S_A^(n)(t) and the mutual information I_{A:A_M}(t) from initial states with long-range correlations (crosscap states) in two classes of systems. For brickwork circuits, the authors analyze swap gates, random unitary circuits, and dual unitary circuits, finding that integrable (swap) circuits show delayed linear decrease and revivals of S_A, while chaotic circuits keep S_A constant and show a linear decrease of I_{A:A_M} that permanently vanishes. For Hamiltonian dynamics, they derive a free-fermion quasiparticle prediction, Eq. (3.18), which is checked against exact numerics, and extend it to interacting integrable chains via the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz. The results are interpreted through a modified quasiparticle/membrane picture.

Significance. The paper extends the quasiparticle and membrane pictures to initial states with long-range entanglement and maximal initial entropy, a scenario opposite to the standard low-entanglement quench. The main strengths are the exact free-fermion formulas (3.13), (3.18), and (3.21), which are derived from the correlation matrix and verified numerically (Figs. 5, 7, 8), and the explicit solvable circuit results. If the identified caveats are resolved, the paper would provide a useful reference for entanglement dynamics from crosscap-type states, including falsifiable predictions for quantum simulators.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, before Eq. (3.3)] The Hamiltonian free-fermion results are derived for the Gaussian state |C⟩ of Eq. (3.3), which the authors note is one component of the Jordan-Wigner image of the spin crosscap state (1.2); all numerical checks in Figs. 5, 7, and 8 start from this Gaussian state rather than the actual spin crosscap state. Since the entanglement entropy is not additive over a superposition, the central claim about quenches from crosscap states under Hamiltonian dynamics is not established; the authors should prove that the second Gaussian component does not affect S_A(t) and I_{A:A_M}(t) or provide numerical evidence for the full spin state.
  2. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A.2), (A.13)] The stationary-phase derivation in Appendix A is algebraically inconsistent with the main text. Using Eq. (3.12) and the relation ⟨N_A^2⟩ = σ_A^2 + ℓ^2, one obtains ⟨N_A^2⟩ = ℓ^2 + ℓ/2 − (1/2) Σ ..., whereas Eq. (A.2) has ℓ^2 − ℓ/2 − ℓ^2 ∫ ... . The final expression (A.13) also does not reduce to Eq. (3.13): the counting function in (A.13), after multiplying by ℓ, is max(0, ℓ − |2 τ_k v(k) − L/2|), while Eq. (3.13) contains max(0, 2ℓ − |2 τ_k v(k) − L|). These factors of two and the sign of the ℓ/2 term need to be corrected, since the derivation as written does not reproduce the numerically verified result (3.13).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (2.30)] The condition '2ℓ ≤ mt > 0' is likely a typo; it should probably read '0 < mt ≤ 2ℓ'. Also, the explanation of the parity-dependent minimum at t_min would benefit from an explicit example.
  2. [Sec. 3.4] The interacting TBA results (3.23) and the curves in Figs. 9 and 10 are not compared to any independent numerical simulation; a small-system exact diagonalization or TEBD benchmark would support the extension to interacting integrable models.
  3. [Sec. 2.2] The statement that the annealed average result implies the constant entropy 'for all realizations' is terse; since ⟨tr ρ^2⟩ = q^{−2ℓ} and tr ρ^2 ≥ q^{−2ℓ}, the argument is valid, but it would benefit from stating this inequality explicitly.
  4. [Sec. 3.2] The variables τ_k and τ'_k are used in Eqs. (3.16) and (3.18) before their formal definitions in (3.14) and (3.17); consider defining them earlier to improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the free-fermion quasiparticle prediction is derived from exact correlation functions, machine-checked against exact numerics, and the interacting extension imports standard TBA inputs rather than fitted quantities.

full rationale

The central free-fermion result, Eq. (3.18), is not fitted into existence. It is obtained by applying stationary-phase methods to the exact correlation matrix (3.7) and the exact charge-fluctuation identity (3.11); the periodic time tau_k is fixed by the saddle-point validity window (A.11)-(A.12), and Eq. (3.18) is compared with exact numerics in Fig. 7. No parameter of the prediction is adjusted to make it match. The interacting TBA formula (3.23) inherits the standard quasiparticle picture and occupation functions from external or well-established integrability literature (e.g. Takahashi's text [84] and the integrable crosscap-state overlap results [52]), not from fitting SA(t); the quasiparticle framework is imported from prior work, including self-citations [12,19], but it is an established, externally falsifiable framework rather than an unexamined self-citation chain. The circuit results are exact diagrammatic reductions supplemented by large-q asymptotic recursions, with no fitted inputs. The only notable gap is the paper's explicit replacement of the spin crosscap state (1.2), whose Jordan-Wigner image is a superposition of two Gaussian states, by a single fermionic Gaussian component (3.3): the paper states, just before Eq. (3.3), 'while the entanglement dynamics of superpositions of Gaussian states can be studied analytically, it is much more involved... we shall study the fermionic crosscap state defined directly... equivalent to each of the individual Gaussian states in the spin chain realization.' This is a modeling limitation, not a circularity: Eq. (3.18) does not reduce by construction to an input, the exact numerical checks validate the substituted state, and no parameter is renamed as a prediction. Accordingly the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted in the central formulas: model parameters q, L, l, and U are inputs, numerical cutoffs (Lambda=10, M=40) are tested for convergence, and the unitary M defining the initial state drops out of the entropies. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or mediators are introduced. The crosscap state is a known construction from CFT and integrable spin chains, and the quasiparticle species are the standard TBA strings. The only paper-specific modeling choice is the restriction to the fermionic crosscap state, which is entered in the axioms and flagged as a weak point.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math Unitary evolution and the replica trick correctly represent Renyi entropies.
    Used throughout Sec. 2 and in Eq. (1.6); standard textbook material.
  • domain assumption The initial state |M> is 'solvable': unitarity of M allows the diagrammatic reductions in Eqs. (2.14)-(2.15).
    Assumed for all circuit results; it is exactly true by unitarity of M, so not ad hoc.
  • standard math For free fermions, all entanglement entropies follow from the two-point correlation matrix (Peschel's formula).
    Cited as [86]; standard and exact for Gaussian states.
  • domain assumption The thermodynamic limit L, l, t -> infinity at fixed ratios lets one replace sums by integrals and use stationary phase.
    Used in Appendix A to derive (3.13); standard in this literature, with accuracy checked numerically.
  • domain assumption For interacting integrable chains, the quasiparticle picture applies to the von Neumann entanglement entropy after a quench.
    Imported from Alba-Calabrese [12]; used to write Eq. (3.23) without a first-principles derivation.
  • domain assumption Crosscap states are integrable initial states with known Bethe overlaps and TBA occupation functions.
    Cited [50-52]; used in Appendix B to set occupation functions such as theta_m = 1/(m+1)^2.
  • domain assumption The dual-unitary identity (2.44) holds for the gates considered.
    Imported from Foligno-Bertini [56]; used to obtain Eq. (2.45).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quench dynamics of entanglement from crosscap states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/74SCNERR

@misc{pith2026241204187,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quench dynamics of entanglement from crosscap states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/74SCNERR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04187}
}
read the original abstract

The linear growth of entanglement after a quench from a state with short-range correlations is a universal feature of many body dynamics. It has been shown to occur in integrable and chaotic systems undergoing either Hamiltonian, Floquet or circuit dynamics and has also been observed in experiments. The entanglement dynamics emerging from long-range correlated states is far less studied, although no less viable using modern quantum simulation experiments. In this work, we investigate the dynamics of the bipartite entanglement entropy and mutual information from initial states which have long-range entanglement with correlation between antipodal points of a finite and periodic system. Starting from these crosscap states, we study both brickwork quantum circuits and Hamiltonian dynamics and find distinct patterns of behaviour depending on the type of dynamics and whether the system is integrable or chaotic. Specifically, we study both dual unitary and random unitary quantum circuits as well as free and interacting fermion Hamiltonians. For integrable systems, we find that after a time delay the entanglement experiences a linear in time decrease followed by a series of revivals, while, in contrast, chaotic systems exhibit constant entanglement entropy. On the other hand, both types of systems experience an immediate linear decrease of the mutual information in time. In chaotic systems this then vanishes, whereas integrable systems instead experience a series of revivals. We show how the quasiparticle and membrane pictures of entanglement dynamics can be modified to describe this behaviour, and derive explicitly the quasiparticle picture in the case of free fermion models which we then extend to all integrable systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04187 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the initial state and subsystems of interest. We consider a qudit chain of length 2L, in which qudits on opposite sides of the system are initially entangled. For the crosscap state, |C⟩, antipodal points are prepared in an EPR state given by |↑⟩x |↑⟩x+L+|↓⟩x |↓⟩ √ x+L 2 . The subsystem, A, is taken to be a contiguous block of 2ℓ qudits. These are initially maximalliy entangled with the qudits in AM … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The bipartite entanglement entropy of a subsystem A of length 2ℓ in a system of total length 2L, of the initial state |M⟩, as a function of the subsystem length 2ℓ. where A¯ = [2ℓ+2, 2L+1] is the complement of A and in going to the last line we have used the unitarity of the matrix M. Thus, the initial state appears locally indistinguishable from the infinite temperature state, as long as ℓ ≤ L/2. This is in sharp c… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: S (n) A (t)/2ℓ as a function of t/2ℓ for the swap gate circuit with L odd (solid blue line), the swap gate circuit with L even (dashed green line) and generic dual unitary circuits as well (red symbols). Right: I (n) A (t)/4ℓ as a function of t/2ℓ for the same systems. circuit which is, instead, chaotic. In this case the local gates are independently drawn at random from the Haar ensemble and we shall be inter… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A depiction of the quasiparticle picture for the free fermion quench of the crosscap state, |C⟩. From each point in space, quasiparticles of momenta k and −k are emitted. These are depicted by the blue and red arrows. Quasiparticles are only correlated with the opposit…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: ⟨N2 A(t)⟩ = ℓ 2 + σ 2 A(t) for total system size 2L = 160 and subsystem size 2ℓ = 30, with the symbols being the exact calculation and the blue curve using the quasiparticle picture obtained from (3.13). Right: ⟨N2 A∪AM (t)⟩, for total system size 2L = 40 and sub…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A depiction of the quasiparticle dynamics for the disjoint subsystem A ∪ AM. Quasiparticle pairs, depicted by red and blue, dashed and solid arrows, are emitted from each point in space. Correlations exist only between quasiparticles represented by the same color and s…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left:SA(t) for total system size 2L = 400 and subsystem size 2ℓ = 140, with the blue curve being the exact calculation and the orange curve using the quasiparticle picture. Right: The time averaged entanglement entropy SA(ℓ) as a function of subsystem size (solid blue)…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: IA:AM (t), for total system size 2L = 400 and subsystem size 2ℓ = 140, with the symbols being the exact numerical result and the blue curve using the quasiparticle picture. Right: The time averaged mutual information IA:AM (ℓ) as a function of ℓ ≤ L/2 (solid blue…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: SA(t)/2ℓ (Top) and IA:AM (t)/4ℓ (bottom) for 2L = 160, 2ℓ = 30 obtained from the quasiparticle picture in the gapless regime, using U = cos(π/4) ≈ 0.7 (solid lines). We also plot the contributions of the quasiparticle species with m = 1, 2, 3 (dashed lines). Righ…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Left: The behaviour of SA(t)/2ℓ as a function of time for different values of U in both the gapless and gapped cases. As the interactions strength is increased the initial decay occurs earlier and earlier. Right: The behaviour of IA:AM (t)/4ℓ as a function of time for…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exact Quench Dynamics from Thermal Pure Quantum States

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A quench from a TPQ state in the XX chain produces a double-plateau entanglement profile, exactly derived by CFT on a Klein bottle, Gaussian numerics, and a quasiparticle picture.

  2. Quasiparticle Picture for Entanglement Hamiltonians in Higher Dimensions

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For free fermion quenches in d≥2, the entanglement Hamiltonian at the ballistic scale is given by a quasiparticle-picture kernel built from the mode occupation function, extending the 1D result to higher dimensions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Polkovnikov, K

    A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, Colloquium: Nonequi- librium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.83 (2011) 863. 32

    2011

  2. [2]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E50 (1994) 888

    1994

  3. [3]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems, Nature 452 (2008) 854D858

    2008

  4. [4]

    Bastianello, B

    A. Bastianello, B. Bertini, B. Doyon, and R. Vasseur, Introduction to the special issue on emergent hydrodynamics in integrable many-body systems, J. Stat. Mech. (2022) 014001

    2022

  5. [5]

    Calabrese, F

    P. Calabrese, F. H. L. Essler, and G. Mussardo, Introduction to ‘Quantum integra- bility in out of equilibrium systems’, J. Stat. Mech.(2016) 064001

    2016

  6. [6]

    Vidmar and M

    L. Vidmar and M. Rigol, Generalized Gibbs ensemble in integrable lattice models, J. Stat. Mech.(2016) 064007

    2016

  7. [7]

    Mitra, Quantum quench dynamics, Ann

    A. Mitra, Quantum quench dynamics, Ann. Rev. Cond. Matt. Phys.9 (2018) 245

    2018

  8. [8]

    Rylands and N

    C. Rylands and N. Andrei, Nonequilibrium aspects of integrable models, Ann. Rev. Cond. Matt. Phys.11 (2020) 147

    2020

Show all 93 references
  1. [9]

    M. P. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Random quantum circuits, Ann. Rev. Cond. Matt. Phys.14 (2023) 335

    2023

  2. [10]

    Amico, R

    L. Amico, R. Fazio, A. Osterloh, and V. Vedral,Entanglement in many-body systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.80 (2008) 517

    2008

  3. [11]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems, J. Stat. Mech.(2005) P04010

    2005

  4. [12]

    Alba and P

    V. Alba and P. Calabrese, Entanglement and thermodynamics after a quantum quench in integrable systems, PNAS 114 (2017) 7947

    2017

  5. [13]

    Alba and P

    V. Alba and P. Calabrese, Entanglement dynamics after quantum quenches in generic integrable systems, SciPost Phys. 4 (2018) 017

    2018

  6. [14]

    Alba and F

    V. Alba and F. Carollo, Spreading of correlations in Markovian open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B103 (2021) L020302

    2021

  7. [15]

    Bucciantini, M

    L. Bucciantini, M. Kormos, and P. Calabrese, Quantum quenches from excited states in the ising chain, J. Phys. A47 (2014) 175002

    2014

  8. [16]

    Kormos, L

    M. Kormos, L. Bucciantini, and P. Calabrese, Stationary entropies after a quench from excited states in the Ising chain, EPL 107 (2014) 40002

    2014

  9. [17]

    Calabrese, F

    P. Calabrese, F. H. L. Essler, and M. Fagotti, Quantum quench in the transverse field Ising chain: I. Time evolution of order parameter correlators, J. Stat. Mech. (2012) P07016

    2012

  10. [18]

    Coser, E

    A. Coser, E. Tonni, and P. Calabrese,Entanglement negativity after a global quantum quench, J. Stat. Mech.(2014) P12017

    2014

  11. [19]

    Alba and P

    V. Alba and P. Calabrese, Quantum information dynamics in multipartite integrable systems, EPL 126 (2019) 60001

    2019

  12. [20]

    D. X. Horv´ ath and C. Rylands, Full counting statistics of charge in quenched quantum gases, Phys. Rev. A109 (2024) 043302

    2024

  13. [21]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Calabrese, M. Collura, K. Klobas, and C. Rylands, Nonequilibrium full counting statistics and symmetry-resolved entanglement from space-time duality, 33 Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 140401

    2023

  14. [22]

    Parez, R

    G. Parez, R. Bonsignori, and P. Calabrese, Quasiparticle dynamics of symmetry- resolved entanglement after a quench: Examples of conformal field theories and free fermions, Phys. Rev. B103 (2021) L041104

    2021

  15. [23]

    Parez, R

    G. Parez, R. Bonsignori, and P. Calabrese, Exact quench dynamics of symmetry resolved entanglement in a free fermion chain, J. Stat. Mech.(2021) 093102

    2021

  16. [24]

    Dubail, Entanglement scaling of operators: a conformal field theory approach, with a glimpse of simulability of long-time dynamics in 1+1d, J

    J. Dubail, Entanglement scaling of operators: a conformal field theory approach, with a glimpse of simulability of long-time dynamics in 1+1d, J. Phys. A50 (2017) 234001

    2017

  17. [25]

    A. Rath, V. Vitale, S. Murciano, M. Votto, J. Dubail, R. Kueng, C. Branciard, P. Calabrese, and B. Vermersch, Entanglement barrier and its symmetry resolution: Theory and experimental observation, PRX Quantum 4 (2023) 010318

    2023

  18. [26]

    F. Ares, S. Murciano, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry as a probe of symmetry breaking, Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 2036

    2023

  19. [27]

    Murciano, F

    S. Murciano, F. Ares, I. Klich, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry and quantum Mpemba effect in the XY spin chain, J. Stat. Mech.2024 (2024) 013103

    2024

  20. [28]

    Rylands, K

    C. Rylands, K. Klobas, F. Ares, P. Calabrese, S. Murciano, and B. Bertini, Micro- scopic Origin of the Quantum Mpemba Effect in Integrable Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 010401

    2024

  21. [29]

    Chalas, F

    K. Chalas, F. Ares, C. Rylands, and P. Calabrese, Multiple crossings during dynam- ical symmetry restoration and implications for the quantum mpemba effect, J. Stat. Mech. 2024 (2024) 103101

    2024

  22. [30]

    Bertini, K

    B. Bertini, K. Klobas, M. Collura, P. Calabrese, and C. Rylands, Dynamics of charge fluctuations from asymmetric initial states, Phys. Rev. B109 (2024) 184312

    2024

  23. [31]

    Rottoli, C

    F. Rottoli, C. Rylands, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement Hamiltonians and the quasiparticle picture, arXiv:2407.01730

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Travaglino, C

    R. Travaglino, C. Rylands, and P. Calabrese, Quasiparticle picture for entanglement Hamiltonians in higher dimensions, arXiv:2412.01538

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Zhou and A

    T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Emergent statistical mechanics of entanglement in random unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. B99 (2019) 174205

    2019

  26. [34]

    Jonay, D

    C. Jonay, D. A. Huse, and A. Nahum, Coarse-grained dynamics of operator and state entanglement, arXiv:1803.00089

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Zhou and A

    T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Entanglement membrane in chaotic many-body systems, Phys. Rev. X10 (2020) 031066

    2020

  28. [36]

    M. A. Rampp, S. A. Rather, and P. W. Claeys, Entanglement membrane in exactly solvable lattice models, Phys. Rev. Res.6 (2024) 033271

    2024

  29. [37]

    Foligno, P

    A. Foligno, P. Kos, and B. Bertini, Quantum information spreading in generalized dual-unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 250402

    2024

  30. [38]

    W. Tang, L. Chen, W. Li, X. C. Xie, H.-H. Tu, and L. Wang, Universal Boundary Entropies in Conformal Field Theory: A Quantum Monte Carlo Study, Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 115136. 34

    2017

  31. [39]

    W. Tang, X. C. Xie, L. Wang, and H.-H. Tu, Klein bottle entropy of compactified boson conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. B99 (2019) 115105

    2019

  32. [40]

    Li, L.-P

    Z.-Q. Li, L.-P. Yang, Z. Y. Xie, H.-H. Tu, H.-J. Liao, and T. Xiang,Critical properties of the two-dimensional q-state clock model, Phys. Rev. E101 (2020) 060105

    2020

  33. [41]

    Caetano and S

    J. Caetano and S. Komatsu, Crosscap states in integrable field theories and spin chains, J. Stat. Phys.187 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Ishibashi, The Boundary and Crosscap States in Conformal Field Theories, Mod

    N. Ishibashi, The Boundary and Crosscap States in Conformal Field Theories, Mod. Phys. Lett. A4 (1989) 251

    1989

  35. [43]

    Fioravanti, G

    D. Fioravanti, G. Pradisi, and A. Sagnotti, Sewing constraints and nonorientable open strings, Phys. Lett. B321 (1994) 349

    1994

  36. [44]

    Zhang, A

    Y. Zhang, A. Hulsch, H.-C. Zhang, W. Tang, L. Wang, and H.-H. Tu, Universal Scaling of Klein Bottle Entropy near Conformal Critical Points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 151602

    2023

  37. [45]

    B.-Y. Tan, Y. Zhang, H.-C. Zhang, W. Tang, L. Wang, H.-H. Tu, and Y.-H. Wu, Extracting the Luttinger parameter from a single wave function, arXiv:2402.18364

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Zhang, Y.-H

    Y. Zhang, Y.-H. Wu, L. Wang, and H.-H. Tu, Crosscap states and duality of Ising field theory in two dimensions, arXiv:2409.11046

  39. [47]

    E. K. Sklyanin, Boundary conditions for integrable quantum systems, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 21 (1988) 2375

    1988

  40. [48]

    Ghoshal and A

    S. Ghoshal and A. Zamolodchikov, Boundary s-matrix and boundary state in two- dimensional integrable quantum field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A09 (1994) 3841

    1994

  41. [49]

    Piroli, B

    L. Piroli, B. Pozsgay, and E. Vernier, What is an integrable quench?, Nucl. Phys. B 925 (2017) 362

    2017

  42. [50]

    Gombor, Integrable crosscap states in gl(N) spin chains, JHEP 10 (2022) 096

    T. Gombor, Integrable crosscap states in gl(N) spin chains, JHEP 10 (2022) 096

    2022

  43. [51]

    Ekman, Crosscap states in the XXX spin-1/2 spin chain, arXiv:2207.12354

    C. Ekman, Crosscap states in the XXX spin-1/2 spin chain, arXiv:2207.12354

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    He and Y

    M. He and Y. Jiang, Integrable crosscap states: from spin chains to 1D Bose gas, JHEP (2023) 79

    2023

  45. [53]

    D. N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett.71 (1993) 1291

    1993

  46. [54]

    Bertini, K

    B. Bertini, K. Klobas, V. Alba, G. Lagnese, and P. Calabrese, Growth of R´ enyi entropies in interacting integrable models and the breakdown of the quasiparticle picture, Phys. Rev. X12 (2022) 031016

    2022

  47. [55]

    Nahum, J

    A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Quantum entanglement growth under random unitary dynamics, Phys. Rev. X7 (2017) 031016

    2017

  48. [56]

    Foligno and B

    A. Foligno and B. Bertini, Entanglement of disjoint intervals in dual-unitary circuits: Exact results, arXiv:2408.16750

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    Alba and P

    V. Alba and P. Calabrese, Quantum information scrambling after a quantum quench, Phys. Rev. B100 (2019) 115150

    2019

  50. [58]

    Modak, V

    R. Modak, V. Alba, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement revivals as a probe of scrambling in finite quantum systems, J. Stat. Mech.2020 (2020) 083110

    2020

  51. [59]

    Fraenkel and C

    S. Fraenkel and C. Rylands, Entanglement in dual unitary quantum circuits with 35 impurities, arXiv:2410.03442

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Singha Roy, S

    S. Singha Roy, S. N. Santalla, J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Laguna, and G. Sierra,Entanglement as geometry and flow, Phys. Rev. B101 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    Singha Roy, S

    S. Singha Roy, S. N. Santalla, G. Sierra, and J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Laguna,Link representation of the entanglement entropies for all bipartitions, J. Phys. A54 (2021) 305301

    2021

  54. [62]

    S. N. Santalla, G. Ram ´ ırez, S. S. Roy, G. Sierra, and J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Laguna,Entan- glement links and the quasiparticle picture, Phys. Rev. B107 (2023) L121114

    2023

  55. [63]

    J. I. Cirac, D. P´ erez-Garc ´ ıa, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete,Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2021) 045003

    2021

  56. [64]

    Piroli, B

    L. Piroli, B. Bertini, J. I. Cirac, and T. Prosen, Exact dynamics in dual-unitary quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B101 (2020) 094304

    2020

  57. [65]

    Weingarten, Asymptotic Behavior of Group Integrals in the Limit of Infinite Rank, J

    D. Weingarten, Asymptotic Behavior of Group Integrals in the Limit of Infinite Rank, J. Math. Phys.19 (1978) 999

    1978

  58. [66]

    Collins and P

    B. Collins and P. ´Sniady, Integration with respect to the haar measure on unitary, orthogonal and symplectic group, Commun. Math. Phys.264 (2006) 773

    2006

  59. [67]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Exact spectral form factor in a minimal model of many-body quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) 264101

    2018

  60. [68]

    Gopalakrishnan and A

    S. Gopalakrishnan and A. Lamacraft, Unitary circuits of finite depth and infinite width from quantum channels, Phys. Rev. B100 (2019) 064309

    2019

  61. [69]

    Prosen, Many-body quantum chaos and dual-unitarity round-a-face, Chaos 31 (2021) 093101

    T. Prosen, Many-body quantum chaos and dual-unitarity round-a-face, Chaos 31 (2021) 093101

    2021

  62. [70]

    P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Ergodic and nonergodic dual-unitary quantum circuits with arbitrary local Hilbert space dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 100603

    2021

  63. [71]

    P. Kos, B. Bertini, and T. Prosen, Correlations in perturbed dual-unitary circuits: Efficient path-integral formula, Phys. Rev. X11 (2021) 011022

    2021

  64. [72]

    Kos and G

    P. Kos and G. Styliaris, Circuits of space and time quantum channels, Quantum 7 (2023) 1020

    2023

  65. [73]

    Foligno, T

    A. Foligno, T. Zhou, and B. Bertini, Temporal entanglement in chaotic quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. X13 (2023) 041008

    2023

  66. [74]

    Bertini and L

    B. Bertini and L. Piroli, Scrambling in random unitary circuits: Exact results, Phys. Rev. B102 (2020) 064305

    2020

  67. [75]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Operator Entanglement in Local Quantum Circuits I: Chaotic Dual-Unitary Circuits, SciPost Phys. 8 (2020) 067

    2020

  68. [76]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Operator Entanglement in Local Quantum Circuits II: Solitons in Chains of Qubits, SciPost Phys. 8 (2020) 068

    2020

  69. [77]

    Holden-Dye, L

    T. Holden-Dye, L. Masanes, and A. Pal, Fundamental charges for dual-unitary circuits, arXiv:2312.14148

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    Borsi and B

    M. Borsi and B. Pozsgay, Construction and the ergodicity properties of dual unitary 36 quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B106 (2022) 014302

    2022

  71. [79]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Exact correlation functions for dual-unitary lattice models in 1 + 1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 210601

    2019

  72. [80]

    Giudice, G

    G. Giudice, G. Giudici, M. Sonner, J. Thoenniss, A. Lerose, D. A. Abanin, and L. Piroli, Temporal entanglement, quasiparticles, and the role of interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128 (2022) 220401

    2022

  73. [81]

    Vernier, B

    E. Vernier, B. Bertini, G. Giudici, and L. Piroli, Integrable digital quantum simu- lation: Generalized Gibbs ensembles and Trotter transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 260401

    2023

  74. [82]

    H. A. Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle. I. Eigenwerte und Eigenfunktionen der linearen Atomkette, Zeit. f¨ ur Physik71 (1931) 205

    1931

  75. [83]

    Orbach, Linear antiferromagnetic chain with anisotropic coupling, Phys

    R. Orbach, Linear antiferromagnetic chain with anisotropic coupling, Phys. Rev. 112 (1958) 309

    1958

  76. [84]

    Takahashi, Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models

    M. Takahashi, Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models. Cambridge University Press, 1999

    1999

  77. [85]

    Fagotti and P

    M. Fagotti and P. Calabrese, Entanglement entropy of two disjoint blocks in XY chains, J. Stat. Mech.(2010) P04016

    2010

  78. [86]

    Peschel, Calculation of reduced density matrices from correlation functions, J

    I. Peschel, Calculation of reduced density matrices from correlation functions, J. Phys. A 36 (2003) L205

    2003

  79. [87]

    Klich and L

    I. Klich and L. Levitov, Quantum Noise as an Entanglement Meter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 100502

    2009

  80. [88]

    Calabrese, M

    P. Calabrese, M. Mintchev, and E. Vicari, Exact relations between particle fluctua- tions and entanglement in fermi gases, EPL 98 (2012) 20003

    2012

  81. [89]

    Fagotti and P

    M. Fagotti and P. Calabrese, Evolution of entanglement entropy following a quantum quench: Analytic results for the XY chain in a transverse magnetic field, Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 010306

    2008

  82. [90]

    Lagnese, P

    G. Lagnese, P. Calabrese, and L. Piroli, Entanglement dynamics of thermofield double states in integrable models, J. Phys. A55 (2022) 214003

    2022

  83. [91]

    Bianchi, L

    E. Bianchi, L. Hackl, and M. Kieburg, Page curve for fermionic gaussian states, Phys. Rev. B103 (Jun, 2021) L241118

    2021

  84. [92]

    Gopalakrishnan and R

    S. Gopalakrishnan and R. Vasseur, Kinetic theory of spin diffusion and superdiffusion in XXZ spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 127202

    2019

  85. [93]

    Bertini, K

    B. Bertini, K. Klobas, and T.-C. Lu,Entanglement negativity and mutual information after a quantum quench: Exact link from space-time duality, Phys. Rev. Lett.129 (2022) 140503. 37

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.