Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Ultrahigh-temperature ferromagnetism in ultrathin insulating films with ripple-infinite-layer structure

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A heavily reduced strontium ferrite phase, ripple-infinite-layer SrFeO2, is claimed to be a ferromagnetic insulator with an extrapolated Curie temperature of about 1200 K and ferromagnetism down to 1 nm thickness.

desk verdict A new ripple-infinite-layer SrFeO2 phase gives a plausible ferromagnetic insulator up to 900 K, but the 1200 K Curie temperature is an unsupported extrapolation and the headline overreaches. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04957 v1 pith:G3JJZPCD submitted 2024-12-06 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yazhuo Yi , Haoliang Huang , Ruiwen Shao , Yukuai Liu , Guangzheng Chen , Jiahui Ou , Xi Zhang , Ze Hua
show 10 more authors
Lang Chen Chi Wah Leung Xie-Rong Zeng Feng Rao Nan Liu Heng Wang Liang Si Hongyu An Zhuoyu Chen Chuanwei Huang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ripple-infinite-layerSrFeO2ferromagneticinsulatortopotacticreductionbrownmilleritespinHallmagnetoresistancestrainengineeringhighCurietemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a heavily reduced phase of strontium ferrite, SrFeO2, arranged in a newly identified ripple-infinite-layer (RIL) structure, is simultaneously a robust ferromagnet and an electrical insulator, two properties usually considered mutually exclusive. The authors report a magnetization of roughly 180 emu/cc at low temperature, resistivity above $10^6$ Ω·cm, an optical bandgap of about 3.27 eV, and a Curie temperature extrapolated to about 1200 K. Ferromagnetic order is retained down to about 1.0 nm thickness on its growth substrate and about 2.0 nm in freestanding membranes, and Pt/RIL devices show spin Hall magnetoresistance up to about 2.6 parts per thousand at room temperature. The broader significance is that a single material with both high-temperature ferromagnetism and insulating behavior is a long-sought building block for spintronic and topological devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the ripple-infinite-layer (RIL) structure of SrFeO2, in which the FeO2 layers run out of plane and ripple instead of lying flat. It is generated by a long topotactic reduction (over 120 hours) of brownmillerite SrFeO2.5 films grown on YAlO3 substrates that impose compressive strains above 6%, and it is visualized with integrated differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy. The mechanism the authors propose is a change in exchange balance: the rippled Fe-O-Fe bond angles weaken super-exchange and simultaneously enhance direct Fe-Fe exchange, flipping the ground state from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic while preserving the square-planar FeO4 coordination and the insulating gap. Density functional theory plus Hubbard U calculations are used to support the energetic preference for ferromagnetism in the RIL structure.

What would settle it

Measure the magnetization-versus-temperature curve of RIL SrFeO2 in an oxygen-free atmosphere from 900 K upward: if the magnetization does not smoothly approach zero near 1200 K (or if the RIL phase decomposes before reaching it), the ultrahigh Curie temperature is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the magnetic ground state of SrFeO2 switches from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic when the flat FeO2 planes of the conventional infinite-layer phase are deformed into the out-of-plane rippled layers of the RIL phase. The authors show that this structural deformation, rather than any change in iron valence or oxygen hybridization, is responsible for the magnetism: rippling reduces the Fe-O-Fe super-exchange interaction and strengthens Fe-Fe direct exchange, favoring ferromagnetism. The RIL phase is obtained by topotactic reduction of brownmillerite SrFeO2.5 films under compressive strain above 6%, and it combines a large magnetization with a bandgap near 3.27 eV and resistivity above $10^6$ Ω·cm. Extrapolating the measured magnetization-temperature curve gives a Curie temperature near 1200 K, and magnetization is detectable even in 1.0-nm-thick films at 400 K.

Load-bearing premise

The 1200 K Curie temperature is an extrapolation of a magnetization curve measured only up to about 900 K, because the RIL phase starts to re-oxidize at that point; if the assumed shape of the magnetization falloff is wrong, the ultrahigh temperature claim fails, although ferromagnetism up to 900 K would still stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The combination of extrapolated $T_C$ near 1200 K with resistivity above $10^6$ Ω·cm places RIL SrFeO2 outside the usual inverse correlation between magnetic ordering temperature and electrical insulation.
  • Ferromagnetism down to 1.0 nm on substrate and 2.0 nm freestanding makes the phase a candidate for ultrathin magnetic tunnel barriers, spin filters, and spin-orbit torque devices.
  • Pt/RIL Hall bars show a spin Hall magnetoresistance ratio up to about 2.6‰ at 300 K, an improvement of more than 200% over previously reported heavy-metal/ferromagnet or ferrimagnet devices.
  • The films can be released from the growth substrate and transferred to flexible PET, silicon, or glass while preserving crystal structure and magnetic properties, enabling flexible or silicon-integrated spintronics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 1200 K extrapolation is taken at face value, RIL SrFeO2 would be among the highest-temperature ferromagnetic insulators known, and the rippling mechanism could be deliberately sought in other infinite-layer oxides such as nickelates.
  • The reported resistivity is only a lower bound set by the measurement limit, so the true insulating character (e.g., Mott vs. band insulator) remains untested by transport alone.
  • Because the RIL phase forms only under very high compressive strain, an in-plane testable prediction is that relaxing the strain should suppress ferromagnetism, which would confirm the exchange-deformation mechanism.
  • The freestanding films retain ferromagnetism with minor weakening, suggesting that the magnetic order is intrinsic to the RIL structure; comparing films transferred to substrates with different lattice parameters would separate strain effects from chemical effects.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a new structural phase of SrFeO2, termed ripple-infinite-layer (RIL), obtained by lengthy topotactic reduction of brownmillerite SrFeO2.5 films under high compressive strain. The authors claim that RIL-SrFeO2 is a ferromagnetic insulator with magnetization of about 180 emu/cc, resistivity above 10^6 Ω·cm, a band gap near 3.27 eV, an extrapolated Curie temperature of about 1200 K, ferromagnetism retained down to 1.0 nm thickness on the substrate and 2.0 nm in freestanding films, and spin Hall magnetoresistance of about 2.6‰ in Pt/RIL devices. DFT+U calculations are presented in support of the claim that the IL phase favors antiferromagnetism while the RIL phase favors ferromagnetism.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a notable result: an insulating ferromagnet with a Curie temperature extrapolated above 1000 K, combined with thickness scalability to the nanometer range and transferrability to arbitrary substrates, would be a strong advance for spintronics and topological electronics. The paper's strengths are its extensive structural characterization (XRD, HAADF/ABF-STEM, iDPC, EDS, TOF-SIMS), the XAS-based valence assignment, the high-temperature and thickness-dependent magnetometry, the freestanding-film transfer demonstration, the SMR device results, and the independent DFT+U explanation of the magnetism. The central quantitative claim of an ultrahigh Curie temperature, however, rests on an extrapolation that the manuscript does not document, and the resistivity claim is a measurement-limit lower bound; these points need clarification before the strongest conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2A and main text, page 6] The 1200 K Curie temperature is obtained by extrapolating the magnetization-temperature curve, but the measured data appear to extend only to about 900 K, where the authors state that the RIL phase begins to be partially re-oxidized. Because the decline of M above 900 K could be caused by progressive conversion to a less-magnetic phase rather than by approach to the intrinsic magnetic transition, the extrapolation is not self-evidently valid. The manuscript does not disclose the functional form used for the fit, the fitting range, or a confidence interval, and the M(T) data are measured in a 6000 Oe field, so a field-induced tail cannot be distinguished from a true Curie transition without additional zero-field or Arrott-plot data. Please provide a detailed description of the extrapolation, show the fit against the measured points, report uncertainty, and ideally support the intrinsic TC with an alternative method such as high-field magnetization analysis, Mössbauer spectroscopy, or specific-heat measurements. If this is not possible, the abstract and conclusions should be revised to state robust ferromagnetism at or above 900 K without the quantitative 1200 K claim.
  2. [Fig. 3 and Methods] The claim of resistivity above 10^6 Ω·cm is presented as a measured material property, but the text says the resistivity 'has gone beyond the maximum limit of our measurement setup,' so this is a lower bound, not a measured value. This distinction should be explicit in the main text and abstract, and the measurement geometry, temperature, and setup limit should be reported. Similarly, the band gaps from optical absorption and the magnetization values are quoted without error bars; given that the central comparison in Fig. 3B depends on these quantities, quantitative uncertainties should be provided.
  3. [Fig. 2B, 2C, 2F] The thickness-dependent and high-temperature magnetic data are central to the claim of robust ferromagnetism down to 1.0 nm and in freestanding films, but the reported values lack error bars and the hysteresis loops are not quantified in terms of coercivity or remanence. For the 1.0 nm film, the inset shows a loop at 400 K but no saturation magnetization value or measurement uncertainty is given; for transferred films the text mentions 'minor weakening' without a number. Please add quantitative magnetization, coercivity, and error estimates, and specify how many samples were measured for the thickness series.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Page 3, 'desirable magnetization'] Please state the field and temperature at which 180 emu/cc was determined; the M(T) curve is measured at about 6000 Oe, so the magnetization value should be reported with the same field and temperature conditions.
  2. [Page 6, 'mixed IL & RIL' reconfirmation] The statement that the 1200 K TC is reconfirmed in the mixed IL & RIL phase refers to fig. S11, but the extrapolation procedure and fit should be shown for that system as well, or the claim should be softened if the data are not as complete.
  3. [Page 5, 'SrFeO3-δ (0.5 ≤ δ ≤1.0)'] The definition of δ is confusing because the brownmillerite phase is SrFeO2.5 and the reduced phases are SrFeO2; please define δ explicitly for each phase or use a less ambiguous notation.
  4. [Fig. 3B] The comparison plot of TC versus resistivity for known ferromagnetic/ferrimagnetic insulators should include error bars or at least a data table in the supplement, since the position of RIL-SrFeO2 in that plot is a central visual claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims rest on independent experimental measurements and DFT+U calculations, not on fitted inputs or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is not circular. The ripple-infinite-layer (RIL) phase is identified experimentally through XRD, STEM/iDPC, XAS, and EDS, and its ferromagnetic insulating character is measured directly via magnetization, resistivity, and spin Hall magnetoresistance. The DFT+U calculations are presented as an independent theoretical explanation of the magnetic preference (FM in RIL vs. AFM in IL), not as a fit to the measured magnetization; no equation or fitting procedure in the main text makes the calculated magnetic state equivalent to the measured data by construction. The claimed Curie temperature near 1200 K is explicitly described as an extrapolation of the measured M-T curve, which is a standard data-based estimate rather than a model prediction that reuses a fitted parameter; its reliability is a legitimate correctness concern because the measurement ends near 900 K where re-oxidation begins, but this is not circularity. The only self-citations (refs. 39 and 40, including coauthor L. Si) are used to contrast the absence of hydrogen intercalation in SrFeO2 with nickelate behavior; they are peripheral to the main claims and not load-bearing. No fitted input is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks for its principal experimental and theoretical claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce new fundamental entities; the RIL phase is an experimentally observed crystal structure, not a postulated particle or force. The key unverified inputs are the Hubbard U value, the TC extrapolation model, and the intrinsic-phase assumption.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard U parameter for Fe 3d in DFT+U = not disclosed in main text; likely 4-5 eV
    The DFT+U total energy comparison between FM and AFM states in the RIL phase depends on the empirically chosen U value. The main text defers the value to Table S1, which is not available in this preprint, so the computational conclusion cannot be independently reproduced.
  • Curie temperature extrapolation fit = approximately 1200 K
    The M-T curve is extrapolated to zero magnetization using an undisclosed functional form. The resulting 1200 K is a fitted estimate, not a directly measured transition, and is sensitive to the choice of fitting range and model.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The ferromagnetism measured in the RIL films is intrinsic to the RIL phase and not dominated by secondary phases such as Fe, Fe3O4, or other ferromagnetic impurities.
    The paper uses EDS and TOF-SIMS to rule out decomposition and hydrogen intercalation, but does not provide a quantitative phase-purity analysis that excludes trace ferromagnetic impurities below detection limits. All magnetic claims rely on this.
  • domain assumption The structural model of the RIL phase (out-of-plane rippled FeO2 planes with alternating Sr displacements) inferred from iDPC-STEM and XRD is correct.
    This structural model is the basis for the DFT+U calculations and the proposed exchange mechanism. An incorrect reconstruction would invalidate the mechanism, though not necessarily the observed magnetism.
  • domain assumption The magnetization measured at 6000 Oe represents the saturation magnetization of the RIL phase.
    The M-T extrapolation assumes the measured moment is the intrinsic magnetization of the RIL phase, not a contribution from the substrate, field-induced canting, or a second phase.
  • domain assumption DFT+U with the selected functional and U value correctly captures the exchange competition in SrFeO2.
    The computational result showing that RIL favors FM over AFM is used as evidence for the mechanism; if the U value is not appropriate, the mechanism could be wrong even if the experiments are correct.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultrahigh-temperature ferromagnetism in ultrathin insulating films with ripple-infinite-layer structure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G3JJZPCD

@misc{pith2026241204957,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultrahigh-temperature ferromagnetism in ultrathin insulating films with ripple-infinite-layer structure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G3JJZPCD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04957}
}
read the original abstract

Ferromagnetism and electrical insulation are often at odds, signifying an inherent trade off. The simultaneous optimization of both in one material, essential for advancing spintronics and topological electronics, necessitates the individual manipulation over various degrees of freedom of strongly correlated electrons. Here, by selective control of the spin exchange and Coulomb interactions, we report the achievement of SrFeO2 thin films with resistivity above 106 Ohm.cm and strong magnetization with Curie temperature extrapolated to be 1200 K. Robust ferromagnetism is obtained down to 1.0 nm thickness on substrate and 2.0 nm for freestanding films. Featuring an out of plane oriented ripple infinite layer structure, this ferromagnetic insulating phase is obtained through extensive reduction of as grown brownmillerite SrFeO2.5 films at high compressive strains. Pronounced spin Hall magnetoresistance signals up to 0.0026 is further demonstrated with a Pt Hall bar device. Our findings promise emerging spintronic and topological electronic functionalities harnessing spin dynamics with minimized power dissipations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Manipatruni et al

    S. Manipatruni et al. , Scalable energy -efficient magnetoelectric spin -orbit logic. Nature 565, 35-42 (2018). 9 / 18

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Yang et al

    H. Yang et al. , Two -dimensional materials prospects for non -volatile spintronic memories. Nature 606, 663-673 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    K. He, Y . Wang, Q.-K. Xue, Topological Materials: Quantum Anomalous Hall System. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 9, 329-344 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Meng et al

    D. Meng et al. , Strain -induced high -temperature perovskite ferromagnetic insulator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 12, 2873 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Schmehl et al

    A. Schmehl et al. , Epitaxial integration of the highly spin -polarized ferromagnetic semiconductor EuO with silicon and GaN. Nat. Mater. 6, 882- 887 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Zhang et al

    Q. Zhang et al. , Near -room temperature ferromagnetic insulating state in highly distorted LaCoO2.5 with CoO5 square pyramids. Nat Commun 12, 1853 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Matsumoto et al

    Y . Matsumoto et al. , Room -Temperature Ferromagnetism in Transparent Transition Metal-Doped Titanium Dioxide. Science 291, 854-856 (2001)

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    M. A. Ruderman, C. Kittel, Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons. Phys. Rev. 96, 99-102 (1954)

    work page 1954

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Yosida, Magnetic Properties of Cu -Mn Alloys

    K. Yosida, Magnetic Properties of Cu -Mn Alloys. Phys. Rev. 106, 893 -898 (1957)

    1957

  2. [10]

    Kasuya, A Theory of Metallic Ferro - and Antiferromagnetism on Zener's Model

    T. Kasuya, A Theory of Metallic Ferro - and Antiferromagnetism on Zener's Model. Prog. Theor. Phys. 16, 45-57 (1956)

    1956

  3. [11]

    Boschker et al., High-Temperature Magnetic Insulating Phase in Ultrathin LSMO Films

    H. Boschker et al., High-Temperature Magnetic Insulating Phase in Ultrathin LSMO Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 157207 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    Sadoc et al., Large Increase of the Curie Temperature by Orbital Ordering Control

    A. Sadoc et al., Large Increase of the Curie Temperature by Orbital Ordering Control. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 046804 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Gajek et al., Spin filtering through ferromagneticBiMnO3tunnel barriers

    M. Gajek et al., Spin filtering through ferromagneticBiMnO3tunnel barriers. Phys. Rev. B 72, 020406 (2005)

    2005

  6. [14]

    Chakraverty et al

    S. Chakraverty et al. , BaFeO 3 cubic single crystalline thin film: A ferromagnetic insulator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 142416 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    J. H. Lee et al., A strong ferroelectric ferromagnet created by means of spin - 10 / 18 lattice coupling. Nature 466, 954-958 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    J. S. Moodera, X. Hao, G. A. Gibson, R. Meservey, Electron-Spin Polarization in Tunnel Junctions in Zero Applied Field with Ferromagnetic EuS Barriers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 637-640 (1988)

    1988

  9. [17]

    L. F. Kourkoutis, J. H. Song, H. Y . Hwang, D. A. Muller, Microscopic origins for stabilizing room-temperature ferromagnetism in ultrathin manganite layers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 11682-11685 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Chen et al

    X. Chen et al. , Magnetotransport Anomaly in Room -Temperature Ferrimagnetic NiCo2O4 Thin Films. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805260 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Lü ders et al

    U. Lü ders et al. , NiFe 2O4: A Versatile Spinel Material Brings New Opportunities for Spintronics. Adv. Mater. 18, 1733-1736 (2006)

    2006

  12. [20]

    Mitra et al

    A. Mitra et al. , Interfacial Origin of the Magnetisation Suppression of Thin Film Yttrium Iron Garnet. Scientific Reports 7, 11774 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Salahuddin, K

    S. Salahuddin, K. Ni, S. Datta, The era of hyper -scaling in electronics. Nature Electronics 1, 442-450 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Puebla, J

    J. Puebla, J. Kim, K. Kondou, Y . Otani, Spintronic devices for energy-efficient data storage and energy harvesting. Communications Materials 1, 24 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Chang, C.-X

    C.-Z. Chang, C.-X. Liu, A. H. MacDonald, Colloquium: Quantum anomalous Hall effect. Reviews of Modern Physics 95, 0110002 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Tang et al

    C. Tang et al. , Above 400 -K robust perpendicular ferromagnetic phase in a topological insulator. Science Advances 3, e1700307 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Gajek et al

    M. Gajek et al. , Tunnel junctions with multiferroic barriers. Nat. Mater. 6, 296-302 (2007)

    2007

  18. [26]

    W. Han, S. Maekawa, X.-C. Xie, Spin current as a probe of quantum materials. Nat. Mater. 19, 139-152 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Lu et al

    D. Lu et al. , Synthesis of freestanding single -crystal perovskite films and heterostructures by etching of sacrificial water -soluble layers. Nat. Mater. 15, 1255-1260 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Zhang et al

    J. Zhang et al. , Super -tetragonal Sr 4Al2O7 as a sacrificial layer for high - 11 / 18 integrity freestanding oxide membranes. Science 383, 388-394 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Han et al

    L. Han et al. , High -density switchable skyrmion -like polar nanodomains integrated on silicon. Nature 603, 63-67 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    S. S. Cheema et al., Enhanced ferroelectricity in ultrathin films grown directly on silicon. Nature 580, 478-482 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    C. O. Avci et al. , Current -induced switching in a magnetic insulator. Nat. Mater. 16, 309-314 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    B. F. Miao, S. Y . Huang, D. Qu, C. L. Chien, Physical Origins of the New Magnetoresistance in Pt/YIG. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 236601 (2014)

    2014

  25. [33]

    Tassel, H

    C. Tassel, H. Kageyama, Square planar coordinate iron oxides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 2025-2035 (2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    Tsujimoto et al., Infinite-layer iron oxide with a square-planar coordination

    Y . Tsujimoto et al., Infinite-layer iron oxide with a square-planar coordination. Nature 450, 1062-1065 (2007)

    2007

  27. [35]

    Li et al., Superconductivity in an infinite -layer nickelate

    D. Li et al., Superconductivity in an infinite -layer nickelate. Nature 572, 624- 627 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    W. J. Kim et al., Geometric frustration of Jahn-Teller order in the infinite-layer lattice. Nature 615, 237-243 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Inoue et al., Anisotropic oxygen diffusion at low temperature in perovskite - structure iron oxides

    S. Inoue et al., Anisotropic oxygen diffusion at low temperature in perovskite - structure iron oxides. Nat Chem 2, 213-217 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    Nukala et al., Reversible oxygen migration and phase transitions in hafnia - based ferroelectric devices

    P. Nukala et al., Reversible oxygen migration and phase transitions in hafnia - based ferroelectric devices. Science 372, 630-635 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Si et al

    L. Si et al. , Topotactic Hydrogen in Nickelate Superconductors and Akin Infinite-Layer Oxides ABO2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 166402 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Ding et al., Critical role of hydrogen for superconductivity in nickelates

    X. Ding et al., Critical role of hydrogen for superconductivity in nickelates. Nature 615, 50-55 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Wang et al., Robust Ferromagnetism in Highly Strained SrCoO3 Thin Films

    Y . Wang et al., Robust Ferromagnetism in Highly Strained SrCoO3 Thin Films. Physical Review X 10, 021030 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Li et al

    W. Li et al. , Interface Engineered Room‐Temperature Ferromagnetic Insulating State in Ultrathin Manganite Films. Advanced Science 7, 1901606 12 / 18 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Q. I. Yang et al. , Pulsed laser deposition of high -quality thin films of the insulating ferromagnet EuS. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 082402 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    Geprä gs et al

    S. Geprä gs et al. , Static magnetic proximity effects and spin Hall magnetoresistance in Pt/Y 3Fe5O12 and inverted Y 3Fe5O12/Pt bilayers. Phys. Rev. B 102, 214438 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Quindeau et al

    A. Quindeau et al. , Tm 3Fe5O12/Pt Heterostructures with Perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy for Spintronic Applications. Advanced Electronic Materials 3, 1600376 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    J. Q. Guo et al., Spin Hall magnetoresistance of CoFe 2O4/Pt heterostructures with interface non -collinear magnetic configurations. Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 142403 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Ganzhorn et al., Spin Hall magnetoresistance in a canted ferrimagnet

    K. Ganzhorn et al., Spin Hall magnetoresistance in a canted ferrimagnet. Phys. Rev. B 94, 094401 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Ding et al

    Z. Ding et al. , Spin Hall magnetoresistance inPt/Fe 3O4 thin films at room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 90, 134424 (2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    Crossley et al

    S. Crossley et al. , Ferromagnetic resonance of perpendicularly magnetized Tm3Fe5O12/Pt heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 172402 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Althammer et al

    M. Althammer et al. , Role of interface quality for the spin Hall magnetoresistance in nickel ferrite thin films with bulk -like magnetic properties. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 092403 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Dong et al

    B.-W. Dong et al. , Spin Hall magnetoresistance in the non -collinear ferrimagnet GdIG close to the compensation temperature. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 035802 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    X. Guan, G. Zhou, W. Xue, Z. Quan, X. Xu, The investigation of giant magnetic moment in ultrathin Fe3O4 films. APL Mater. 4, 036104 (2016)

    2016

  45. [53]

    Althammer et al., Quantitative study of the spin Hall magnetoresistance in ferromagnetic insulator/normal metal hybrids

    M. Althammer et al., Quantitative study of the spin Hall magnetoresistance in ferromagnetic insulator/normal metal hybrids. Phys. Rev. B 87, 224401 (2013). 13 / 18 Acknowledgements: R. S . acknowledges the Analysis and Testing Center at the Beijing Institute of Technology. X. ...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.