Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 55 references

Oscillatory properties of strange quark stars described by the vector MIT bag model

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Strange quark stars, modeled with the vector MIT bag model, would emit gravitational-wave f-mode oscillations confined to a narrow band of roughly 1.5-1.8 kHz, giving a clean observational signature to distinguish them from ordinary…

desk verdict Solid f-mode calculations for vMIT strange stars, but the headline frequency 'restriction' rests on a single post hoc parameter set and overstates the robustness. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05752 v2 pith:TDUL4EXA submitted 2024-12-07 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords strangequarkstarsvectorMITbagmodelf-modeoscillationsgravitationalwaveasteroseismologyequationofstateuniversalrelationcompactNICERconstraints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that strange quark stars built from the vector MIT bag model oscillate in the gravitational-wave fundamental mode with frequencies restricted to a narrow band: 1.6-1.8 kHz for high-mass stars and 1.5-1.6 kHz for low-mass stars. The authors compute a thermodynamically consistent equation of state, then derive the mass-radius relation, gravitational redshift, radial stability, and non-radial f-mode frequencies for three values of the vector coupling. They show that the coupling G_V = 0.30 $fm^{2}$ produces the only family that simultaneously satisfies current NICER, PSR J0740+6620, PSR J0437-4715, and HESS J1731 constraints. The result matters because a detected f-mode in this narrow band would point to self-bound quark matter rather than ordinary neutron stars.

What carries the argument

The central object is the vector MIT bag model: MIT-bag confinement of quarks plus a generic massive vector field V_mu coupled to up, down, and strange quarks, with the coupling rewritten as G_V = (g_uV/m_V)^2 and a universal coupling ratio X_V = g_sV/g_uV = 1.0. A mass term -1/2 $m_V^{2}$ $V_0^{2}$ is included to maintain thermodynamic consistency, the mean-field approximation yields the equation of state, and the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations give equilibrium configurations. Radial oscillations use the Gondek et al. formulation and non-radial l = 2 oscillations use the full Detweiler-Lindblom perturbation system with outgoing-wave boundary conditions via the Zerilli equation, so no Cowling approximation is made.

What would settle it

Detect a gravitational-wave f-mode from a compact object whose mass is independently known, with central frequency outside 1.5-1.8 kHz for the G_V = 0.30 family, or measure a 1.4 solar-mass radius above 13.1 km while the object otherwise behaves as a strange quark star; either would contradict the paper's restricted band and its mass-radius fit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that strange quark stars described by the vector MIT bag model, with a universal vector coupling X_V = 1.0 and a thermodynamically consistent equation of state, have quadrupole f-mode gravitational-wave frequencies restricted to (1.6-1.8) kHz for high-mass stars and (1.5-1.6) kHz for low-mass stars, once the coupling G_V = 0.30 $fm^{2}$ is selected to match current astrophysical observations. The paper also finds that the radial f-mode frequency reaches zero exactly at the maximum mass, that increasing G_V stabilizes stars in the (1.2-2.0) solar-mass range, and that the non-radial f-mode obeys the universal linear relation f = a + b (M/$R^{3}$)^{1/2} with b = 42.5 km*kHz and a = 0.086 kHz, an intercept much closer to zero than in hadronic neutron-star models, which the authors attribute to the absence of a crust.

Load-bearing premise

The vector field couples to up, down, and strange quarks with exactly the same strength (X_V = 1.0), which makes stars more massive; if the true coupling follows the symmetry-group value X_V = 0.4, the G_V = 0.30 family no longer reaches 2 solar masses and the predicted frequency band shifts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the paper is right, a gravitational-wave detection of an f-mode from a compact star with known mass in the 1.5-1.8 kHz band would support the strange-quark-star interpretation over ordinary neutron stars.
  • The G_V = 0.30 fm^2 family is singled out as the only one satisfying all four adopted astrophysical constraints, so continued radius measurements can independently test the model.
  • The universal relation f = a + b (M/R^3)^{1/2} holds across all three equations of state, with a slope b similar to hadronic models but an intercept a near zero, making the intercept a potential crust diagnostic.
  • The vanishing radial f-mode frequency at maximum mass confirms that the stability boundary coincides with the TOV maximum-mass turning point for these one-phase stars.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the predicted band is so narrow, a future detection of a compact-star f-mode outside 1.5-1.8 kHz would disfavor this vMIT strange-star family even before detailed equation-of-state reconstruction; this is my inference, not the paper's claim.
  • The near-zero intercept a, tied to a crustless self-bound object, suggests that precise f-mode versus average-density measurements could serve as a crust detector separating strange stars from hadronic stars.
  • The universal-coupling assumption X_V = 1.0 is the load-bearing choice; if the symmetry-group value X_V = 0.4 were used, the G_V = 0.30 family would not reach 2 solar masses and the quoted frequency band would shift, so an independent Bayesian analysis with X_V treated as free would test the prediction directly.
  • The paper's machinery could be extended to compute g-modes or tidal deformability for the same equations of state, giving additional gravitational-wave discriminators between quark stars and neutron stars.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates radial and non-radial fundamental-mode oscillations of self-bound strange quark stars in the vector MIT (vMIT) bag model. After constructing a thermodynamically consistent equation of state, the authors solve the TOV equations for three values of the vector coupling G_V (0.18, 0.24, 0.30 fm^2) with corresponding bag constants chosen inside the Bodmer-Witten stability window. They compare the resulting mass-radius curves with recent NICER, PSR J0740+6620, PSR J0437-4715, and HESS J1731-347 constraints, concluding that G_V = 0.30 fm^2 is the only value satisfying all constraints. They then compute radial f-mode frequencies using the Gondek et al. formulation and non-radial f-mode frequencies and damping times using the full Detweiler-Lindblom perturbation equations without the Cowling approximation. The main reported results are that the non-radial f-mode frequency is 'restricted' to 1.6-1.8 kHz for high-mass stars and 1.5-1.6 kHz for low-mass stars, and that a universal linear relation between f and (M/R^3)^{1/2} holds, with fit coefficients a = 0.086 kHz and b = 42.5 km·kHz on average.

Significance. If the quoted narrow f-mode frequency ranges were robust, they would provide a useful gravitational-wave signature for distinguishing strange quark stars from ordinary neutron stars. The paper's methods are standard and carefully chosen: the radial oscillation equations follow Gondek et al., the non-radial calculation solves the full time-dependent perturbation equations without the Cowling approximation, and the inclusion of the -1/2 m_V^2 V_0^2 term in Eq. (8) ensures thermodynamic consistency, an improvement over earlier vMIT implementations. The comparison with observational constraints is also a strength. However, the central claim of a 'restricted' f-mode frequency band is conditional on a single post hoc parameter choice, and the paper does not provide a parameter-space scan, uncertainties, or a quantitative robustness study. The universal-relation claim is likewise based on three correlated EoSs without fit errors. These issues undermine the strength of the conclusions as currently stated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section V, Fig. 5; Abstract] The statement that the gravitational-wave frequency of the fundamental mode is 'restricted to (1.6 - 1.8) kHz for high mass stars and to (1.5 - 1.6) kHz for low mass stars' is derived from a single parameter set: G_V = 0.30 fm^2, B^{1/4} = 140 MeV, and X_V = 1.0. This set is selected in Section III because it satisfies the adopted astronomical constraints, and X_V = 1.0 is chosen 'in opposition' to the symmetry-group value 0.4 used in Refs. [17,18]. The abstract claims that 'variations of the remaining vMIT parameters slightly modify this conclusion,' but no quantitative variation study, error bars, or allowed-region mapping appears anywhere in the manuscript. The stability window defined by Eqs. (9)-(10) permits a range of bag constants for each G_V, and the degeneracy between X_V, G_V, and B is not explored. Without a scan over the full parameter region compatible with the observational constraints, the word 'restricted' overstates what the calculation demonstrates.
  2. [Section V, Eq. (43), Table I] The universal relation f = a + b (M/R^3)^{1/2} is presented as a main result, but the fit coefficients are quoted without uncertainties: a = 0.142, 0.107, 0.009 kHz and b = 41.1, 42.3, 44.2 km·kHz for G_V = 0.30, 0.24, 0.18 fm^2, with a mean a = 0.086 kHz and b = 42.5 km·kHz. Only three EoSs, all from the same model and with correlated parameters, are used. The text claims that the coefficient a for strange stars is 'much closer to zero' than for hadronic stars, but the strange-star result from Ref. [48] (a = -0.023, b = 44.1) lies within the scatter of the quoted hadronic values. A quantitative comparison with fit errors, or a softened statement, is needed to support the claimed universality and the distinction between strange and hadronic stars.
  3. [Section III and Section II, stability window] The conclusion that only G_V = 0.30 fm^2 satisfies all four adopted constraints rests on a point selection of bag constants (B^{1/4} = 150, 145, 140 MeV for G_V = 0.18, 0.24, 0.30 fm^2) rather than on an exploration of the full stability window. Since the EoS, mass-radius curves, and hence the f-mode frequencies depend on B, choosing a different B within the allowed window for G_V = 0.30 could shift the quoted f-mode bands. The paper should map the region of (G_V, B^{1/4}, X_V) that is compatible with the observational constraints and show the resulting spread in f-mode frequencies before claiming a 'restricted' range.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section II, text after Eq. (8)] The phrase 'is crucial to kept the thermodynamic consistency' should be reworded, and 'monotonically crescent' should be 'monotonically increasing'.
  2. [Section V, boundary conditions] In the bullet on the exterior solution, 'outgoing and ongoing gravitational waves' should read 'outgoing and ingoing gravitational waves', since the physical solution is then correctly stated to be purely outgoing.
  3. [Section III, paragraph on HESS J1731-347] The sentence 'the proper existence of the so-called HESS J1731-347 supernova remnant present a puzzle' is grammatically unclear; consider rephrasing.
  4. [References] Reference [25] is incomplete: it lacks journal, volume, and page information and currently ends with an arXiv identifier only.
  5. [Section V, Eq. (33)] The definition of X in Eq. (33) is introduced after it is used in Eqs. (29)-(32) and (34); adding a forward reference or reordering would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the f-mode calculation is independent of the mass-radius fitting, and comparisons are made against external benchmarks.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense. The vMIT EoS is constructed from the Lagrangian in Sec. II with explicit quark masses and couplings; the TOV equations and the Chandrasekhar/Detweiler-Lindblom perturbation equations in Secs. IV and V are standard first-principles tools. The parameter choice GV=0.30 fm^2, B^1/4=140 MeV, XV=1.0 is selected in Sec. III by requiring the mass-radius relation to satisfy NICER/PSR/HESS constraints. This is parameter calibration to one set of observables, not fitting to f-mode frequencies. The f-mode frequencies are then obtained by solving the radial and non-radial perturbation equations for the resulting equilibrium configurations; no equation in the paper defines the f-mode frequency in terms of the fitted parameters, nor are f-mode data used in the parameter selection. The universal relation of Eq. (43) is fitted to the computed f-mode frequencies and compared with independent literature values, which is standard practice rather than a circular step. The paper does overstate robustness by saying the frequencies are 'restricted' to the quoted bands without a quantitative scan over all parameter sets compatible with the constraints, but that is a limitation in uncertainty quantification, not a circularity: the quoted band would change if other viable parameter points were included, but it is not logically forced by the model definition. Self-citations (Refs. [3,4] for model parameters, [48] for strange-star universal-relation values) are either ordinary model attribution or external comparisons and are not load-bearing in the derivation of the claimed frequency range. No specific reduction of a prediction to its input can be quoted, so no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on the vMIT model parameters (GV, bag constant, XV) which are chosen to match observed mass-radius data, plus standard general-relativistic perturbation theory. No new particles or forces are introduced. The fit coefficients of the universal relation are outputs, not inputs, but they are determined by the same chosen parameters.

free parameters (5)
  • GV = 0.18, 0.24, 0.30 fm^2
    The vector coupling strength is not derived; three values are chosen so that the resulting mass-radius curves satisfy NICER, PSR J0740+6620 and HESS J1731 constraints. GV=0.30 is selected as the only value satisfying all four constraints, and the reported f-mode frequencies are for this value.
  • Bag constant B^(1/4) = 150, 145, 140 MeV for GV = 0.18, 0.24, 0.30 fm^2
    For each GV, the bag constant is chosen to lie inside the absolute stability window (Eqs. 9-10). These values set the stiffness and hence the stellar radii and oscillation frequencies.
  • Universal coupling ratio XV = 1.0
    The ratio gsV/guV is set to 1.0 by hand, in opposition to the symmetry-group value 0.4 used in Refs. [17,18]. This choice increases the maximum mass and is needed for the GV=0.30 family to satisfy the 2.0 M_sun constraint.
  • Universal relation intercept a = +0.142, +0.107, +0.009 kHz for GV = 0.30, 0.24, 0.18
    The intercept of Eq. (43) is obtained by fitting a line to the numerically computed f-mode frequencies; it is not derived from the model.
  • Universal relation slope b = 41.1, 42.3, 44.2 km*kHz for GV = 0.30, 0.24, 0.18
    The slope of Eq. (43) is also a fit coefficient from the same linear regression.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Strange quark matter is the true ground state of strongly interacting matter (Bodmer-Witten conjecture)
    The paper assumes that at least some observed pulsars could be strange quark stars, which provides the motivation for interpreting the computed frequencies as potentially observable signatures.
  • domain assumption The mean-field approximation and the vector MIT Lagrangian (Eqs. 1-8) describe quark matter
    The equation of state is constructed within the vector MIT bag model from Ref. [3,4] using the mean-field approximation; the model itself is not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The bag constant for each GV must satisfy the stability window inequalities (Eqs. 9-10)
    Section II uses the absolute stability window to select B values for each GV, a constraint from the strange matter hypothesis.
  • ad hoc to paper Dirac sea / vector self-interaction contributions are negligible
    Section II explicitly omits the self-interaction because it would soften the EoS and reduce maximum masses, a choice that supports the agreement with the 2.0 M_sun constraint.
  • standard math The TOV equations (15-17) and the linearized perturbation equations (20-21, 29-32) are the correct description of hydrostatic equilibrium and small oscillations
    The paper adopts standard general-relativistic stellar structure and perturbation theory from Refs. [20,21,32,33,34,39,40] without modification.
  • domain assumption Strange stars have no hadronic crust that would affect the f-modes
    The paper states that a possible thin hadronic crust would not modify the radial stability results; the non-radial calculation likewise treats the star as a self-bound fluid without a crust.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Oscillatory properties of strange quark stars described by the vector MIT bag model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TDUL4EXA

@misc{pith2026241205752,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Oscillatory properties of strange quark stars described by the vector MIT bag model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TDUL4EXA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05752}
}
abstract

We investigated the radial and non-radial fundamental ($f$) mode oscillations of self-bound (quark) stars obtained after employing the Vector MIT (vMIT) bag model. Within this model, we computed the equation of state for strange quark matter satisfying thermodynamic consistency. This allowed us to obtain the corresponding behavior of the speed of sound, mass-radius relation, and gravitational redshift. In particular, our choice of $G_V$ = 0.30 fm$^2$ produces masses and radii in agreement with recent astronomical data (e.g. from NICER and HESS J1731). In fact, we tested that variations of the remaining vMIT parameters slightly modify this conclusion. Then, we proceeded to compute the radial oscillation frequencies of the $f$-mode, which is tightly connected to the dynamical stability of these compact stars. We found that increments of the $G_V$ parameter have a stabilizing property around the maximal-mass stars for a given stellar family. We also calculated the gravitational-wave frequencies of the non-radial $f$-mode. Our results show that they are restricted to be in the range (1.6 - 1.8) kHz for high-mass stars and to (1.5 - 1.6) kHz for low-mass stars. Finally, we propose a universal relation between these frequencies and the square root of the average density. All these last results are important in distinguishing strange stars from ordinary neutron stars in future gravitational-wave detections coming from compact sources with activated non-radial modes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05752 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) EoS (top) and the square of the speed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Mass-radius diagram ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The gravitational redshift ‘ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The frequency of the fundamental mode is plotted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Non-radial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [48]

    Andersson and K

    N. Andersson and K. D. Kokkotas, To- wards gravitational wave asteroseismology, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 299, 1059 (1998)

  2. [1]

    Flores acknowledges the financial support of the productivity program of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient ´ ıfico e Tecnol´ ogico (CNPq), with Project No

    C. Flores acknowledges the financial support of the productivity program of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient ´ ıfico e Tecnol´ ogico (CNPq), with Project No. 304569/2022-4. J.C.J. is supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient ´ ıfico e Tec- nol´ ogico (CNPq) with Grant No. 151390/2024-0

  3. [2]

    must be lower than the nonstrange infinite baryonic matter. Or explicitly [ 1, 2]: 3 E(uds)/A< 930 MeV, (9) at the same time, the nonstrange matter still needs to have an energy per baryon higher than the one of non- strange infinite baryonic matter, otherwise, protons and neutrons would decay into u and d quarks: E(ud)/A> 930 MeV. (10) Therefore, both, eq. (

  4. [3]

    Lopes, C

    L. Lopes, C. Biesdorf, and D. Menezes, Modi- fied mit bag models—part i: Thermodynamic con- sistency, stability windows and symmetry group, Phys. Scr. 96, 065303 (2021)

  5. [4]

    L. L. Lopes et al., Modified mit bag models—part ii: Qcd phase diagram and hot quark stars, Phys. Scr. 96, 065302 (2021)

  6. [5]

    For instance, near to the maximum mass of the stellar models, the f -mode curves downwards

    One can see that the effect of the GV parameter has similar effects in the curves. For instance, near to the maximum mass of the stellar models, the f -mode curves downwards. The only difference is that this bending is more abrupt when com- pared to other work reported in the literature [ 42, 43]. We also observe that an increase in the values of GV produces...

  7. [6]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017) , arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

  8. [7]

    Branchesi et al., Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs, JCAP 2023 (07), 068

    M. Branchesi et al., Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs, JCAP 2023 (07), 068

Show all 55 references
  1. [8]

    To construct an electrically neutral, beta- stable matter, leptons are added as a free Fermi gas

    being absent in Refs.[ 14– 16] is crucial to kept the thermodynamic consistency of the model. To construct an electrically neutral, beta- stable matter, leptons are added as a free Fermi gas. The pressure is obtained via the thermodynamic relation, p =∑ iµini −ε, where the sum...

  2. [9]

    For a given value of GV , the values of the bag that satisfy the SQM hypothesis form the so-called stability window

    and ( 10) must simultaneous be true. For a given value of GV , the values of the bag that satisfy the SQM hypothesis form the so-called stability window. The stability window for GV = 0.0 up to 0.3 fm 2 is presented as Fig. 4 in Ref. [ 3]. The GV and the bag act together in a ...

  3. [10]

    A. R. Bodmer, Collapsed nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 4, 1601 (1971)

  4. [11]

    Witten, Cosmic separation of phases, Phys

    E. Witten, Cosmic separation of phases, Phys. Rev. D 30, 272 (1984)

  5. [12]

    H. T. Cromartie et al. (NANOGrav), Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar, Nature Astron. 4, 72 (2019) , 1904.06759

  6. [13]

    Furnstahl, B

    R. Furnstahl, B. D. Serot, and H.-B. Tang, Vacuum nucleon loops and naturalness, Nucl. Phys. A 618, 446 (1997)

  7. [14]

    R. O. Gomes, V. Dexheimer, S. Han, and S. Schramm, Can magnetic fields (de)stabilize twin stars?, Mont. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 485, 4873 (2019)

  8. [15]

    Evans et al., A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community, arXiv (2021), 2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]

    M. Evans et al., A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community, arXiv (2021), 2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]

  9. [16]

    Colpi et al., LISA Definition Study Report, arXiv (2024), 2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Colpi et al., LISA Definition Study Report, arXiv (2024), 2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

  10. [17]

    Flores, L

    C. Flores, L. Lopes, L. Benito, and D. Menezes, Gravitational wave signa- tures of highly magnetized neutron stars, The European Physical Journal C 80, 1142 (2020)

  11. [18]

    Chodos, R

    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn, and V. F. Weisskopf, New extended model of hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3471 (1974)

  12. [19]

    B. D. Serot, Quantum hadrodynamics, Rep. Progr. Phys. 55, 1855 (1992)

  13. [20]

    The integration proceeds outward, with the aim of matching the boundary condition at the star’s surface

    and ( 21) using the initial values of ξ(r = 0) and ∆ p(r = 0) that satisfy the central boundary condi- tion outlined above. The integration proceeds outward, with the aim of matching the boundary condition at the star’s surface. After each integration, the trial value of ω2 is...

  14. [21]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, On massive neu- tron cores, Phys. Rev. 55, 374 (1939)

  15. [22]

    R. O. Gomes, P. Char, and S. Schramm, Con- straining strangeness in dense matter with gw170817, Astrophys. J. 877, 139 (2019)

  16. [23]

    Franzon, R

    B. Franzon, R. O. Gomes, and S. Schramm, Effects of the quark-hadron phase transi- tion on highly magnetized neutron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 463, 571 (2016)

  17. [24]

    tortoise

    under these conditions are identified as the eigenfrequencies of the radial pertur- bations. For more details on the method see Ref. [ 35]. In this section, for reasons of coherence, we call ν0 the nu- merical value of the frequency of the fundamental radial mode. In Fig. 4 we ...

  18. [25]

    F. M. da Silva et al., Bayesian study of quark models in view of recent astrophysical constraints, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043054 (2024)

  19. [26]

    Biesdorf, L

    C. Biesdorf, L. L. Lopes, and D. P. Menezes, Qcd phase diagrams via qhd and mit-based models, Braz. J. Phys. 53, 137 (2023)

  20. [27]

    Altiparmak, C

    S. Altiparmak, C. Ecker, and L. Rezzolla, On the Sound Speed in Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 939, L34 (2022)

  21. [28]

    R. C. Tolman, Static solutions of einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid, Phys. Rev. 55, 364 (1939)

  22. [29]

    T. E. Riley et al., A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation, Astrophys. J. Lett. 887, L21 (2019)

  23. [30]

    Miller et al., PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neu- tron Star Matter, Astrophys

    M. Miller et al., PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neu- tron Star Matter, Astrophys. J. Lett. 887, L24 (2019)

  24. [31]

    Miller et al., The radius of PSR j0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-newton data, Astrophys

    M. Miller et al., The radius of PSR j0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-newton data, Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L28 (2021)

  25. [32]

    Choudhury et al., A nicer view of the nearest and brightest millisecond (2024), arXiv:2407.06789 [astro-ph.HE]

    D. Choudhury et al., A nicer view of the nearest and brightest millisecond (2024), arXiv:2407.06789 [astro-ph.HE]

  26. [33]

    Riley et al., A nicer view of the massive pulsar psr j0740+6620 informed by radio timing and xmm-newton spectroscopy, Astrophys

    T. Riley et al., A nicer view of the massive pulsar psr j0740+6620 informed by radio timing and xmm-newton spectroscopy, Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L27 (2021)

  27. [34]

    Doroshenko, V

    V. Doroshenko, V. Suleimanov, G. P¨ uhlhofer, and A. Santangelo, A strangely light neutron star within a 10 supernova remnant, Nat. Astron. 6, 1444 (2022)

  28. [35]

    L. L. Lopes, The neutron star inner crust: An empirical essay, Europhys. Lett. 134, 52001 (2021)

  29. [36]

    J. P. Pereira, C. V. Flores, and G. Lugones, Phase Transition Effects on the Dynamical Stability of Hybrid Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J. 860, 12 (2018) , arXiv:1706.09371 [gr-qc]

  30. [37]

    J. D. V. Arba˜ nil, G. A. Carvalho, R. V. Lobato, R. M. Marinho, and M. Malheiro, Extra dimensions’ influence on the equilibrium and radial stability of strange quark stars, Phys. Rev. D 100, 024035 (2019) , arXiv:1907.07661 [gr-qc]

  31. [38]

    J. M. Z. Pretel, Equilibrium, radial stability and non-adiabatic gravitational collapse of anisotropic neu- tron stars, European Physical Journal C 80, 726 (2020) , arXiv:2008.05331 [gr-qc]

  32. [39]

    Chandrasekhar, The Dynamical Instability of Gaseous Masses Approaching the Schwarzschild Limit in General Relativity., Astrophys

    S. Chandrasekhar, The Dynamical Instability of Gaseous Masses Approaching the Schwarzschild Limit in General Relativity., Astrophys. J. 140, 417 (1964)

  33. [40]

    Chanmugam, Radial oscillations of zero-temperature white dwarfs and neutron stars below nuclear densities., Astrophys

    G. Chanmugam, Radial oscillations of zero-temperature white dwarfs and neutron stars below nuclear densities., Astrophys. J. 217, 799 (1977)

  34. [41]

    Gondek, P

    D. Gondek, P. Haensel, and J. L. Zdunik, Ra- dial pulsations and stability of protoneutron stars, Astron. Astrophys. 325, 217 (1997)

  35. [42]

    V´ asquez Flores and G

    C. V´ asquez Flores and G. Lugones, Radial oscilla- tions of color superconducting self-bound quark stars, Phys. Rev. D 82, 063006 (2010)

  36. [43]

    H. M. Vaeth and G. Chanmugam, Radial os- cillations of neutron stars and strange stars, Astron. Astrophys. 260, 250 (1992)

  37. [44]

    Gondek-Rosinska and J

    D. Gondek-Rosinska and J. L. Zdunik, Avoided cross- ings in radial pulsations of neutron and strange stars, Astron. Astrophys. 344, 117 (1999)

  38. [45]

    Mariani, I

    M. Mariani, I. F. Ranea-Sandoval, G. Lugones, and M. G. Orsaria, Could a slow stable hy- brid star explain the central compact object in HESS J1731-347?, Phys. Rev. D 110, 043026 (2024) , arXiv:2407.06347 [astro-ph.HE]

  39. [46]

    Detweiler and L

    S. Detweiler and L. Lindblom, On the nonra- dial pulsations of general relativistic stellar models, Astrophys. J. 292, 12 (1985)

  40. [47]

    L¨ u and W.-M

    J.-L. L¨ u and W.-M. Suen, Determining the long living quasi-normal modes of relativistic stars, Chinese Physics B 20, 040401 (2011)

  41. [49]

    B. K. Pradhan, D. Chatterjee, M. Lanoye, and P. Jaiku- mar, General relativistic treatment of f -mode oscillations of hyperonic stars, Phys. Rev. C 106, 015805 (2022)

  42. [50]

    L. L. Lopes et al., Imprints of the nuclear symmetry en- ergy slope in gravitational wave signals emanating from neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083042 (2023)

  43. [51]

    Benhar, V

    O. Benhar, V. Ferrari, and L. Gualtieri, Grav- itational wave asteroseismology reexamined, Phys. Rev. D 70, 124015 (2004)

  44. [52]

    Shirke, B

    S. Shirke, B. K. Pradhan, D. Chatterjee, L. Sa- gunski, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Effects of dark matter on f -mode oscillations of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063025 (2024)

  45. [53]

    Guha Roy, T

    D. Guha Roy, T. Malik, S. Bhattacharya, and S. Banik, Analysis of neutron star f-mode oscillations in general rel - ativity with spectral representation of nuclear equations of state, Astrophys. J. 968, 124 (2024)

  46. [54]

    Chirenti, G

    C. Chirenti, G. H. de Souza, and W. Kastaun, Fundamen- tal oscillation modes of neutron stars: validity of univer- sal relations, Phys. Rev. D 91, 044034 (2015)

  47. [55]

    C. V. Flores and G. Lugones, Constraining color fla- vor locked strange stars in the gravitational wave era, Phys. Rev. C 95, 025808 (2017)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.