Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 6 cited by

Full-colour double-virtual amplitudes for associated production of a Higgs boson with a bottom-quark pair at the LHC

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For the first time, a full-colour two-loop five-particle amplitude with an external mass is computed analytically, for Higgs production with a bottom-quark pair.

desk verdict First full-colour two-loop five-point amplitude with a massive external leg; well validated internally but no independent two-loop numerical check - send to a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06519 v2 pith:L36JQWES submitted 2024-12-09 hep-ph hep-th

Simon Badger , Heribertus Bayu Hartanto , Rene Poncelet , Zihao Wu , Yang Zhang , Simone Zoia This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-th PACS 12.38.Bx13.85.-t14.80.Bn
keywords Higgsbosonproductionbottom-quarkpairtwo-loopamplitudesfullcolourfive-pointscatteringhelicityfinite-fieldreconstructionNNLOQCD
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first analytic, full-colour two-loop scattering amplitude for a five-particle process with one massive external leg: Higgs boson production in association with a bottom-quark pair at the LHC. The computation is done in the five-flavour scheme, where the bottom quark is massless but its Yukawa coupling to the Higgs stays finite, and all colour structures are retained. If correct, the result supplies the double-virtual ingredient needed for NNLO QCD predictions for $pp \to b\bar{b}H$, and it opens the way to similar external-mass processes. The authors provide the finite remainders as a public C++ library and demonstrate that evaluating them is fast and numerically stable enough for phenomenological studies.

What carries the argument

The calculation is carried by decomposing the amplitudes into partial colour structures, reducing all Feynman integrals to a minimal pure basis of master integrals, and expanding those in one-mass pentagon functions: special functions describing five-point integrals with one massive external leg, here the Higgs boson. The rational coefficients multiplying these pentagon functions are reconstructed from numerical evaluations over finite fields, using momentum-twistor variables to rationalise the kinematics. The colour decomposition, the integration-by-parts reduction to master integrals, the pentagon-function expansion, and the finite-field reconstruction together form the machinery that makes the full-colour analytic result tractable.

What would settle it

Compute the two-loop finite remainder at the benchmark phase-space point (or any other point) using an independent method that does not share the same integral-reduction, master-integral, and pentagon-function machinery, and compare the result: any disagreement beyond the stated numerical precision would show that the analytic amplitude is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors establish that the two-loop helicity amplitudes for the partonic processes contributing to $pp \to b\bar{b}H$ in the five-flavour scheme can be expressed analytically in terms of one-mass pentagon functions with rational coefficients reconstructed over finite fields, retaining the complete colour structure. This is the first time an analytic full-colour two-loop five-point amplitude with an external mass has been obtained. The finite remainders are free of UV and IR poles by construction; the paper provides their analytic expressions, the pole terms, and benchmark hard functions for all partonic channels. The authors also report that the complete two-loop contribution is roughly ten percent of the leading-order cross section, with subleading-colour terms contributing about two percent.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the internal consistency checks, which all share the same reduction and pentagon-function pipeline, are sufficient to certify the two-loop result; an independent two-loop numerical evaluation is not performed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The analytic finite remainders provide the double-virtual ingredient needed for NNLO QCD predictions for $pp \to b\bar{b}H$ with two bottom-tagged jets in the five-flavour scheme.
  • Full colour control allows the subleading-colour contributions to be quantified, which the paper estimates at about two percent of the leading-order cross section.
  • The public C++ implementation, with average evaluation times near forty seconds per phase-space point and a precision-rescue strategy, is ready for use in Monte Carlo phenomenology.
  • Through the massification procedure that restores leading bottom-mass effects, the authors argue the results can also approximate four-flavour-scheme predictions and high-energy $t\bar{t}H$ amplitudes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the central claim is right, the main bottleneck for NNLO $b\bar{b}H$ phenomenology shifts from the double-virtual amplitudes to the real-emission and subtraction pieces, and differential predictions with full colour should now be within reach.
  • The observed cancellations of the square-root letter $\sqrt{\Delta_5}$ in the finite remainders and of the non-planar letters $\sqrt{\Sigma_5^{(i)}}$ in the bare amplitudes suggest universal analytic structures for one-mass five-point amplitudes, which could be proven from factorisation and analyticity arguments.
  • A fully independent numerical evaluation of one benchmark phase-space point, using a method that does not share the same integral-reduction and pentagon-function pipeline, would provide a stronger external check than the internal consistency tests reported in the paper.
  • The same colour-decomposition and finite-field reconstruction strategy could be applied to other external-mass five-point processes, such as $W b\bar{b}$ or $Z b\bar{b}$ production, where full-colour two-loop results are not yet available analytically.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents the first analytic full-colour two-loop five-particle scattering amplitudes for pp → b bbar H in the five-flavour scheme, with massless bottom quarks and a finite bottom-Yukawa coupling. The amplitudes are obtained through finite-field reconstruction, decomposed into colour and helicity structures, and expressed in terms of one-mass pentagon functions. The authors provide a public C++ library and Mathematica ancillary files for the finite remainders and pole terms, and they report benchmark values of the hard functions together with a numerical stability analysis. The paper claims to be the first analytic full-colour two-loop five-point amplitude with an external mass, extending earlier leading-colour results.

Significance. If the result is correct, this is a major technical achievement and an important step toward NNLO QCD phenomenology for b-bbar-H production, as well as for massification-based approximations of other processes. The manuscript includes several strengths: analytic expressions for all colour structures, a publicly available C++ implementation, detailed documentation of the finite-field reconstruction strategy, multiple internal validation checks, and a stability study in a realistic phase-space. The result is not fitted to data and appears free of circularity. The main weakness is that the two-loop validation lacks a fully independent external numerical benchmark, as all checks share the same IBP reduction and master-integral expansion.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 3.3] All two-loop validation checks listed in Section 3.3 share the same IBP reduction (Eq. (3.12)), the same LiteRed master-integral relations, the same one-mass pentagon-function expansion, and the same finite-field reconstruction. A systematic error in, for example, the DPmz/DPzz IBP systems of Table 1 or in the permutation rules connecting ordered integral families would therefore survive every listed check. The Ward-identity test constrains gauge invariance at the master-integral-coefficient level; pole cancellation and the mu-scaling test (Eq. (3.24)) constrain only the singular and scale-dependent parts; the OpenLoops comparison is tree-level and one-loop only. The direct-helicity comparison is an alternative construction of the loop numerators, but both sides are reduced with the same NeatIBP systems and reconstructed with the same finite-field graphs. I recommend that the authors provide an independent numerical two-loop evaluation for at least one phase-space point, for example using a different reduction code (e.g., Kira or FIRE) or a numerical unitarity/sector-decomposition approach, or else explicitly discuss this limitation and justify why the existing internal consistency checks are sufficient for the central claim of correctness.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2, after Eq. (3.17)] There is a typo: 'to go from Eq. (3.16) to Eq. (3.16)' should read 'to go from Eq. (3.11) to Eq. (3.16)'.
  2. [Section 4.2] The phrase 'only2 − 3 permille of the points' should be written as 'only 2–3 per mille (0.2%–0.3%) of the points' for clarity.
  3. [Appendix A] The word 'Mathematicascripts' appears without a space; it should be 'Mathematica scripts'.
  4. [Section 2.3] In Eq. (2.22), the colour decomposition for the b-bbar-b-bbar channel reuses the symbols A1 and A2 from the q-qbar case while introducing A3 and A4; a sentence clarifying that these are the same partial amplitudes and that the relations in Eq. (2.23) implement the required permutations would improve readability.
  5. [Section 4.1] It would be helpful to state explicitly that the benchmark values in Table 3 are not cross-checked with an external independent implementation at two loops, consistent with the validation limitation noted in Section 3.3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the two-loop amplitude is derived from QCD Feynman rules and standard integral reduction, with no fitted input renamed as a prediction and no load-bearing self-citation chain.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the sense required for a circularity finding: the amplitudes are built from QCD Feynman diagrams (Qgraf), colour decomposition, tensor projectors, IBP reduction to known master integrals, and pentagon-function expansions. Nothing is fitted to the target result and then relabelled as a prediction; the finite remainders are obtained by universal UV renormalisation and IR subtraction, not by imposing the final amplitude. Reuse of the authors' earlier IBP relations (Ref. [91]) and of the leading-colour result (Ref. [42]) is infrastructure sharing: the IBP identities are generated independently by NeatIBP, and the master integrals and one-mass pentagon functions are taken from external references [49, 51, 53] whose derivation does not include the b-bbar-H amplitude. The validation checks in Section 3.3 share the same reduction pipeline, but that is a verification-strength concern, not a circularity: a shared-component error could survive the listed checks without making the stated derivation equivalent to its inputs by construction. No equation in the paper defines the output in terms of itself, and no fitted parameter is promoted to a prediction. Under the hard rules, a non-finding with score 0 is the appropriate verdict.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The computation introduces no free parameters fitted to data and no new physical entities. The only inputs are standard QCD parameters and established mathematical and domain assumptions from the cited literature.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Five-flavour scheme validity: bottom quark treated as massless with finite Yukawa coupling.
    Adopted in Eq. (2.5) and the Introduction; the central amplitude is in this scheme, so the result inherits its approximations.
  • domain assumption Universal infrared factorization: IR singularities are removed by the Z operators of Refs [121,122].
    Used in Section 2.4, Eqs. (2.27)-(2.29). This is standard, but the finiteness of the remainders depends on it.
  • domain assumption Completeness of the one-mass pentagon function basis from Refs [53,56].
    The master integrals are expressed in this basis (Section 3.2, Eq. (3.13)); if the basis were incomplete, the amplitude representation would fail.
  • standard math Correctness of IBP reduction and finite-field reconstruction algorithms.
    The analytic reconstruction (Section 3.2) relies on NeatIBP, FiniteFlow, and polynomial-reconstruction theorems; these are established but not re-derived here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Full-colour double-virtual amplitudes for associated production of a Higgs boson with a bottom-quark pair at the LHC." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L36JQWES

@misc{pith2026241206519,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Full-colour double-virtual amplitudes for associated production of a Higgs boson with a bottom-quark pair at the LHC},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L36JQWES}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06519}
}
abstract

We present the double-virtual amplitudes contributing to the production of a Higgs boson in association with a $b\bar{b}$ pair at the Large Hadron Collider. We perform the computation within the five-flavour scheme, which employs massless bottom quarks and finite bottom-Yukawa coupling, taking into account all the colour structures. We derive the analytic form of the helicity amplitudes through finite-field reconstruction techniques. The analytic expressions have been implemented in a public C++ library, and we demonstrate that evaluations are sufficiently stable and efficient for use in phenomenological studies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Numerical evaluation of two-loop QCD helicity amplitudes for $gg\to t \bar{t} g$ at leading colour

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The two-loop finite remainders for gg to ttbar g at leading colour are evaluated numerically at one benchmark point, with elliptic functions confined to the finite part.

  2. Two-loop leading-color QCD corrections for Higgs plus two-jet production in the heavy-top limit

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Two-loop leading-color helicity amplitudes for H+2 jets in the heavy-top limit are computed analytically and validated, enabling NNLO phenomenology and revealing an anomalous threshold.

  3. Top-Yukawa contributions to $pp\to b\bar{b}H$: two-loop leading-colour amplitudes

    hep-ph 2026-03 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    First analytic two-loop leading-colour amplitudes for top-Yukawa-induced b bbar H production in the heavy-top limit, with Mathematica and C++ code.

  4. The structure of quark mass corrections in the $gg \rightarrow HH$ amplitude at high-energy

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The leading-power mass logarithms in high-energy gg to HH are shown to originate solely from top-quark mass renormalization, enabling a resummation that sharply reduces the mass-scheme uncertainty of the virtual amplitude.

  5. Higgs boson production in association with massive bottom quarks at NNLO+PS

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    First NNLO+PS event generator for b-bbar-H production with massive bottom quarks in the four-flavour scheme, showing NNLO corrections resolve the 4FS/5FS tension.

  6. Next-to-next-to-leading order event generation for $t\bar{t}H$ production with approximate two-loop amplitude

    hep-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    First NNLO+PS (MiNNLOPS) generator for ttH production, combining soft-Higgs and high-energy approximate two-loop amplitudes pointwise, with one-loop-level validation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

143 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [42]

    Badger, H

    S. Badger, H. B. Hartanto, J. Kryś and S. Zoia,Two-loop leading-colour QCD helicity amplitudes for Higgs boson production in association with a bottom-quark pair at the LHC, JHEP 11 (2021) 012, [2107.14733]

    arXiv 2021

  2. [91]

    Badger, H

    S. Badger, H. B. Hartanto, Z. Wu, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia,Two-loop amplitudes forO(α2 s) corrections toW γγproduction at the LHC, 2409.08146

    arXiv

  3. [1]

    Aad et al.,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 1–29, [1207.7214]

    arXiv 2012

  4. [2]

    Chatrchyan et al.,Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys

    CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al.,Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 30–61, [1207.7235]

    arXiv 2012

  5. [3]

    Aad et al.,A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature 607 (2022) 52–59, [2207.00092]

    ATLAScollaboration, G. Aad et al.,A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature 607 (2022) 52–59, [2207.00092]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [4]

    Tumasyan et al.,A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery., Nature 607 (2022) 60–68, [2207.00043]

    CMS collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al.,A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery., Nature 607 (2022) 60–68, [2207.00043]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [5]

    Cepeda et al.,Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep

    M. Cepeda et al.,Report from Working Group 2: Higgs Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.7 (2019) 221–584, [1902.00134]

    arXiv 2019

  8. [6]

    de Florian et al.,Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, D. de Florian et al.,Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, 1610.07922

    arXiv

Show all 143 references
  1. [7]

    Pagani, H.-S

    D. Pagani, H.-S. Shao and M. Zaro,RIP Hbb: how other Higgs production modes conspire to kill a rare signal at the LHC, JHEP 11 (2020) 036, [2005.10277]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Grojean, A

    C. Grojean, A. Paul and Z. Qian,Resurrecting bbh with kinematic shapes, JHEP 04 (2021) 139, [2011.13945]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Konar, B

    P. Konar, B. Mukhopadhyaya, R. Rahaman and R. K. Singh,Probing non-standard b¯bh interaction at the LHC at√s = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B818 (2021) 136358, [2101.10683]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Balazs, J

    C. Balazs, J. L. Diaz-Cruz, H. J. He, T. M. P. Tait and C. P. Yuan,Probing Higgs bosons with large bottom Yukawa coupling at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 055016, [hep-ph/9807349]

    1999 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Dawson, C

    S. Dawson, C. B. Jackson, L. Reina and D. Wackeroth,Higgs production in association with bottom quarks at hadron colliders, Mod. Phys. Lett. A21 (2006) 89–110, [hep-ph/0508293]

    2006 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Manzoni, E

    S. Manzoni, E. Mazzeo, J. Mazzitelli, M. Wiesemann and M. Zaro,Taming a leading theoretical uncertainty in HH measurements via accurate simulations for bbH production, JHEP 09 (2023) 179, [2307.09992]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [13]

    CMS collaboration, Search for the SM Higgs boson produced in association with bottom quarks in final states with leptons,

  8. [14]

    Dicus, T

    D. Dicus, T. Stelzer, Z. Sullivan and S. Willenbrock,Higgs boson production in association with bottom quarks at next-to-leading order, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 094016, [hep-ph/9811492]

    1999 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Balazs, H.-J

    C. Balazs, H.-J. He and C. P. Yuan,QCD corrections to scalar production via heavy quark fusion at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 114001, [hep-ph/9812263]

    1999 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Maltoni, Z

    F. Maltoni, Z. Sullivan and S. Willenbrock,Higgs-Boson Production via Bottom-Quark Fusion, Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 093005, [hep-ph/0301033]

    2003 arXiv

  11. [17]

    R. V. Harlander and W. B. Kilgore,Higgs boson production in bottom quark fusion at next-to-next-to leading order, Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 013001, [hep-ph/0304035]

    2003 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Belyaev, P

    A. Belyaev, P. M. Nadolsky and C. P. Yuan,Transverse momentum resummation for Higgs boson produced via b anti-b fusion at hadron colliders, JHEP 04 (2006) 004, [hep-ph/0509100]

    2006 arXiv

  13. [19]

    R. V. Harlander, K. J. Ozeren and M. Wiesemann,Higgs plus jet production in bottom quark annihilation at next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B693 (2010) 269–273, [1007.5411]

    2010 arXiv

  14. [20]

    K. J. Ozeren,Analytic Results for Higgs Production in Bottom Fusion, JHEP 11 (2010) 084, [1010.2977]. – 28 –

    2010 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Bühler, F

    S. Bühler, F. Herzog, A. Lazopoulos and R. Müller,The fully differential hadronic production of a Higgs boson via bottom quark fusion at NNLO, JHEP 07 (2012) 115, [1204.4415]

    2012 arXiv

  16. [22]

    R. V. Harlander, S. Liebler and H. Mantler,SusHi: A program for the calculation of Higgs production in gluon fusion and bottom-quark annihilation in the Standard Model and the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun.184 (2013) 1605–1617, [1212.3249]

    2013 arXiv

  17. [23]

    R. V. Harlander, A. Tripathi and M. Wiesemann,Higgs production in bottom quark annihilation: Transverse momentum distribution at NNLO+NNLL, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 015017, [1403.7196]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Ahmed, M

    T. Ahmed, M. Mahakhud, P. Mathews, N. Rana and V. Ravindran,Two-loop QCD corrections to Higgs → b + b + g amplitude, JHEP 08 (2014) 075, [1405.2324]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Gehrmann and D

    T. Gehrmann and D. Kara,The Hb¯b form factor to three loops in QCD, JHEP 09 (2014) 174, [1407.8114]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [26]

    A. A H, P. Banerjee, A. Chakraborty, P. K. Dhani, P. Mukherjee, N. Rana et al.,NNLO QCD⊕QED corrections to Higgs production in bottom quark annihilation, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 114016, [1906.09028]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [27]

    C. Duhr, F. Dulat and B. Mistlberger,Higgs Boson Production in Bottom-Quark Fusion to Third Order in the Strong Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 051804, [1904.09990]

    2020 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Mondini and C

    R. Mondini and C. Williams,Bottom-induced contributions to Higgs plus jet at next-to-next-to-leading order, JHEP 05 (2021) 045, [2102.05487]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Biello, A

    C. Biello, A. Sankar, M. Wiesemann and G. Zanderighi,NNLO+PS predictions for Higgs production through bottom-quark annihilation with MINNLOPS, Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 479, [2402.04025]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [30]

    J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, F. Maltoni and S. Willenbrock,Higgs-Boson Production in Association with a Single Bottom Quark, Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 095002, [hep-ph/0204093]

    2003 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Dawson and P

    S. Dawson and P. Jaiswal,Weak Corrections to Associated Higgs-Bottom Quark Production, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 073008, [1002.2672]

    2010 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Dawson, C

    S. Dawson, C. B. Jackson and P. Jaiswal,SUSY QCD Corrections to Higgs-b Production : Is the ∆b Approximation Accurate?, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 115007, [1104.1631]

    2011 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Dittmaier, M

    S. Dittmaier, M. Krämer and M. Spira,Higgs radiation off bottom quarks at the Tevatron and the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 074010, [hep-ph/0309204]

    2004 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Dawson, C

    S. Dawson, C. B. Jackson, L. Reina and D. Wackeroth,Exclusive Higgs boson production with bottom quarks at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 074027, [hep-ph/0311067]

    2004 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Dawson, C

    S. Dawson, C. B. Jackson, L. Reina and D. Wackeroth,Higgs boson production with one bottom quark jet at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett.94 (2005) 031802, [hep-ph/0408077]

    2005 arXiv

  30. [36]

    N. Liu, L. Wu, P. Wu and J. M. Yang,Complete one-loop effects of SUSY QCD inb¯bh production at the LHC under current experimental constraints, JHEP 01 (2013) 161, [1208.3413]

    2013 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Dittmaier, P

    S. Dittmaier, P. Häfliger, M. Krämer, M. Spira and M. Walser,Neutral MSSM Higgs-boson production with heavy quarks: NLO supersymmetric QCD corrections, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 035010, [1406.5307]

    2014 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Deutschmann, F

    N. Deutschmann, F. Maltoni, M. Wiesemann and M. Zaro,Top-Yukawa contributions to bbH production at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2019) 054, [1808.01660]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Wiesemann, R

    M. Wiesemann, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni and P. Torrielli,Higgs production in association with bottom quarks, JHEP 02 (2015) 132, [1409.5301]

    2015 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Jager, L

    B. Jager, L. Reina and D. Wackeroth,Higgs boson production in association with b jets in the POWHEG BOX, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 014030, [1509.05843]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Biello, J

    C. Biello, J. Mazzitelli, A. Sankar, M. Wiesemann and G. Zanderighi,Higgs boson production in association with massive bottom quarks at NNLO+PS, 2412.09510. – 29 –

    arXiv

  36. [43]

    Gehrmann, J

    T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn and N. A. Lo Presti,Analytic form of the two-loop planar five-gluon all-plus-helicity amplitude in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 062001, [1511.05409]

    2016 arXiv

  37. [44]

    C. G. Papadopoulos, D. Tommasini and C. Wever,The Pentabox Master Integrals with the Simplified Differential Equations approach, JHEP 04 (2016) 078, [1511.09404]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Abreu, B

    S. Abreu, B. Page and M. Zeng,Differential equations from unitarity cuts: nonplanar hexa-box integrals, JHEP 01 (2019) 006, [1807.11522]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Chicherin, T

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, N. A. Lo Presti, V. Mitev and P. Wasser,Analytic result for the nonplanar hexa-box integrals, JHEP 03 (2019) 042, [1809.06240]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Chicherin, T

    D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn, P. Wasser, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia,All Master Integrals for Three-Jet Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order, Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 041603, [1812.11160]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Abreu, L

    S. Abreu, L. J. Dixon, E. Herrmann, B. Page and M. Zeng,The two-loop five-point amplitude in N = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 121603, [1812.08941]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Abreu, H

    S. Abreu, H. Ita, F. Moriello, B. Page, W. Tschernow and M. Zeng,Two-Loop Integrals for Planar Five-Point One-Mass Processes, JHEP 11 (2020) 117, [2005.04195]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [50]

    D. D. Canko, C. G. Papadopoulos and N. Syrrakos,Analytic representation of all planar two-loop five-point Master Integrals with one off-shell leg, JHEP 01 (2021) 199, [2009.13917]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Abreu, H

    S. Abreu, H. Ita, B. Page and W. Tschernow,Two-loop hexa-box integrals for non-planar five-point one-mass processes, JHEP 03 (2022) 182, [2107.14180]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Kardos, C

    A. Kardos, C. G. Papadopoulos, A. V. Smirnov, N. Syrrakos and C. Wever,Two-loop non-planar hexa-box integrals with one massive leg, JHEP 05 (2022) 033, [2201.07509]

    2022 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Abreu, D

    S. Abreu, D. Chicherin, H. Ita, B. Page, V. Sotnikov, W. Tschernow et al.,All Two-Loop Feynman Integrals for Five-Point One-Mass Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 141601, [2306.15431]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Gehrmann, J

    T. Gehrmann, J. M. Henn and N. A. Lo Presti,Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes, JHEP 10 (2018) 103, [1807.09812]

    2018 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Chicherin and V

    D. Chicherin and V. Sotnikov,Pentagon Functions for Scattering of Five Massless Particles, JHEP 20 (2020) 167, [2009.07803]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Chicherin, V

    D. Chicherin, V. Sotnikov and S. Zoia,Pentagon functions for one-mass planar scattering amplitudes, JHEP 01 (2022) 096, [2110.10111]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [57]

    von Manteuffel and R

    A. von Manteuffel and R. M. Schabinger,A novel approach to integration by parts reduction, Phys. Lett. B 744 (2015) 101–104, [1406.4513]

    2015 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Peraro,Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction, JHEP 12 (2016) 030, [1608.01902]

    T. Peraro,Scattering amplitudes over finite fields and multivariate functional reconstruction, JHEP 12 (2016) 030, [1608.01902]

    2016 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Klappert and F

    J. Klappert and F. Lange,Reconstructing rational functions with FireFly, Comput. Phys. Commun. 247 (2020) 106951, [1904.00009]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Peraro,FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs, JHEP 07 (2019) 031, [1905.08019]

    T. Peraro,FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs, JHEP 07 (2019) 031, [1905.08019]

    2019 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Klappert, S

    J. Klappert, S. Y. Klein and F. Lange,Interpolation of dense and sparse rational functions and other improvements in FireFly, Comput. Phys. Commun.264 (2021) 107968, [2004.01463]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Klappert, F

    J. Klappert, F. Lange, P. Maierhöfer and J. Usovitsch,Integral reduction with Kira 2.0 and finite field methods, Comput. Phys. Commun.266 (2021) 108024, [2008.06494]. – 30 –

    2021 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Gluza, K

    J. Gluza, K. Kajda and D. A. Kosower,Towards a Basis for Planar Two-Loop Integrals, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 045012, [1009.0472]

    2011 arXiv

  57. [64]

    R. M. Schabinger,A New Algorithm For The Generation Of Unitarity-Compatible Integration By Parts Relations, JHEP 01 (2012) 077, [1111.4220]

    2012 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Ita,Two-loop Integrand Decomposition into Master Integrals and Surface Terms, Phys

    H. Ita,Two-loop Integrand Decomposition into Master Integrals and Surface Terms, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 116015, [1510.05626]

    2016 arXiv

  59. [66]

    G. Chen, J. Liu, R. Xie, H. Zhang and Y. Zhou,Syzygies Probing Scattering Amplitudes, JHEP 09 (2016) 075, [1511.01058]

    2016 arXiv

  60. [67]

    J. Böhm, A. Georgoudis, K. J. Larsen, M. Schulze and Y. Zhang,Complete sets of logarithmic vector fields for integration-by-parts identities of Feynman integrals, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 025023, [1712.09737]

    2018 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Bosma, K

    J. Bosma, K. J. Larsen and Y. Zhang,Differential equations for loop integrals without squared propagators, PoS LL2018 (2018) 064, [1807.01560]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Boehm, D

    J. Boehm, D. Bendle, W. Decker, A. Georgoudis, F.-J. Pfreundt, M. Rahn et al.,Module Intersection for the Integration-by-Parts Reduction of Multi-Loop Feynman Integrals, PoS MA2019 (2022) 004, [2010.06895]

    2022 arXiv

  63. [70]

    X. Guan, X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma and W.-H. Wu,Blade: A package for block-triangular form improved Feynman integrals decomposition, 2405.14621

    arXiv

  64. [71]

    Chestnov, G

    V. Chestnov, G. Fontana and T. Peraro,Reduction to master integrals and transverse integration identities, 2409.04783

    arXiv

  65. [72]

    Badger, D

    S. Badger, D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, G. Heinrich, J. M. Henn, T. Peraro et al.,Analytic form of the full two-loop five-gluon all-plus helicity amplitude, Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 071601, [1905.03733]

    2019 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Agarwal, F

    B. Agarwal, F. Buccioni, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,Two-Loop Helicity Amplitudes for Diphoton Plus Jet Production in Full Color, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 262001, [2105.04585]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [74]

    Badger, C

    S. Badger, C. Brønnum-Hansen, D. Chicherin, T. Gehrmann, H. B. Hartanto, J. Henn et al., Virtual QCD corrections to gluon-initiated diphoton plus jet production at hadron colliders, JHEP 11 (2021) 083, [2106.08664]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [75]

    Abreu, G

    S. Abreu, G. De Laurentis, H. Ita, M. Klinkert, B. Page and V. Sotnikov,Two-loop QCD corrections for three-photon production at hadron colliders, SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 157, [2305.17056]

    2023 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Badger, M

    S. Badger, M. Czakon, H. B. Hartanto, R. Moodie, T. Peraro, R. Poncelet et al.,Isolated photon production in association with a jet pair through next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD, JHEP 10 (2023) 071, [2304.06682]

    2023 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Agarwal, F

    B. Agarwal, F. Buccioni, F. Devoto, G. Gambuti, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,Five-parton scattering in QCD at two loops, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 094025, [2311.09870]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [78]

    De Laurentis, H

    G. De Laurentis, H. Ita, M. Klinkert and V. Sotnikov,Double-virtual NNLO QCD corrections for five-parton scattering. I. The gluon channel, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 094023, [2311.10086]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [79]

    De Laurentis, H

    G. De Laurentis, H. Ita and V. Sotnikov,Double-virtual NNLO QCD corrections for five-parton scattering. II. The quark channels, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 094024, [2311.18752]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [80]

    Badger, C

    S. Badger, C. Brønnum-Hansen, H. B. Hartanto and T. Peraro,Analytic helicity amplitudes for two-loop five-gluon scattering: the single-minus case, JHEP 01 (2019) 186, [1811.11699]

    2019 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Abreu, J

    S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita and B. Page,Analytic Form of Planar Two-Loop Five-Gluon Scattering Amplitudes in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 082002, [1812.04586]

    2019 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Abreu, J

    S. Abreu, J. Dormans, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and V. Sotnikov,Analytic Form of the Planar Two-Loop Five-Parton Scattering Amplitudes in QCD, JHEP 05 (2019) 084, [1904.00945]. – 31 –

    2019 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Abreu, B

    S. Abreu, B. Page, E. Pascual and V. Sotnikov,Leading-Color Two-Loop QCD Corrections for Three-Photon Production at Hadron Colliders, JHEP 01 (2021) 078, [2010.15834]

    2021 arXiv

  77. [84]

    H. A. Chawdhry, M. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet,Two-loop leading-color helicity amplitudes for three-photon production at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2021) 150, [2012.13553]

    2021 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Agarwal, F

    B. Agarwal, F. Buccioni, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi,Two-loop leading colour QCD corrections toq ¯q → γγg and qg → γγq, JHEP 04 (2021) 201, [2102.01820]

    2021 arXiv

  79. [86]

    H. A. Chawdhry, M. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet,Two-loop leading-colour QCD helicity amplitudes for two-photon plus jet production at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2021) 164, [2103.04319]

    2021 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Abreu, F

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and V. Sotnikov,Leading-color two-loop QCD corrections for three-jet production at hadron colliders, JHEP 07 (2021) 095, [2102.13609]

    2021 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Badger, H

    S. Badger, H. B. Hartanto and S. Zoia,Two-Loop QCD Corrections to Wbb¯ Production at Hadron Colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 012001, [2102.02516]

    2021 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Abreu, F

    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Klinkert, B. Page and V. Sotnikov,Leading-color two-loop amplitudes for four partons and a W boson in QCD, JHEP 04 (2022) 042, [2110.07541]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [90]

    Badger, H

    S. Badger, H. B. Hartanto, J. Kryś and S. Zoia,Two-loop leading colour helicity amplitudes for Wγ + j production at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2022) 035, [2201.04075]

    2022 arXiv

  84. [92]

    https://gitlab.com/pentagon-functions/PentagonFunctions-cpp

  85. [93]

    H. A. Chawdhry, M. L. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet,NNLO QCD corrections to three-photon production at the LHC, JHEP 02 (2020) 057, [1911.00479]

    2020 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Kallweit, V

    S. Kallweit, V. Sotnikov and M. Wiesemann,Triphoton production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD, Phys. Lett. B812 (2021) 136013, [2010.04681]

    2021 arXiv

  87. [95]

    H. A. Chawdhry, M. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet,NNLO QCD corrections to diphoton production with an additional jet at the LHC, JHEP 09 (2021) 093, [2105.06940]

    2021 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Czakon, A

    M. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet,Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Study of Three-Jet Production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 152001, [2106.05331]

    2021 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Badger, T

    S. Badger, T. Gehrmann, M. Marcoli and R. Moodie,Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to diphoton-plus-jet production through gluon fusion at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B824 (2022) 136802, [2109.12003]

    2022 arXiv

  90. [98]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, A. Huss and M. Marcoli,Automation of antenna subtraction in colour space: gluonic processes, JHEP 10 (2022) 099, [2203.13531]

    2022 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Alvarez, J

    M. Alvarez, J. Cantero, M. Czakon, J. Llorente, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet,NNLO QCD corrections to event shapes at the LHC, JHEP 03 (2023) 129, [2301.01086]

    2023 arXiv

  92. [100]

    H. B. Hartanto, R. Poncelet, A. Popescu and S. Zoia,Next-to-next-to-leading order QCD corrections to Wbb¯ production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 074016, [2205.01687]

    2022 arXiv

  93. [101]

    H. B. Hartanto, R. Poncelet, A. Popescu and S. Zoia,Flavour anti-kT algorithm applied toW b¯b production at the LHC, 2209.03280

    arXiv

  94. [102]

    Buonocore, S

    L. Buonocore, S. Devoto, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli, L. Rottoli and C. Savoini,Associated production of a W boson and massive bottom quarks at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 074032, [2212.04954]

    2023 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Catani, S

    S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli and C. Savoini,Higgs Boson Production in Association with a Top-Antitop Quark Pair in Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 111902, [2210.07846]. – 32 –

    2023 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Buonocore, S

    L. Buonocore, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli, L. Rottoli et al.,Precise Predictions for the Associated Production of a W Boson with a Top-Antitop Quark Pair at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 231901, [2306.16311]

    2023 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Mazzitelli, V

    J. Mazzitelli, V. Sotnikov and M. Wiesemann,Next-to-next-to-leading order event generation for Z-boson production in association with a bottom-quark pair, 2404.08598

    arXiv

  98. [106]

    Devoto, M

    S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli and C. Savoini,Precise predictions fort¯tH production at the LHC: inclusive cross section and differential distributions, 2411.15340

    arXiv

  99. [107]

    J. Henn, T. Peraro, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang,A first look at the function space for planar two-loop six-particle Feynman integrals, JHEP 03 (2022) 056, [2112.10605]

    2022 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Badger, M

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, E. Chaubey and R. Marzucca,Two-loop master integrals for a planar topology contributing to pp→ttj, JHEP 01 (2023) 156, [2210.17477]

    2023 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Febres Cordero, G

    F. Febres Cordero, G. Figueiredo, M. Kraus, B. Page and L. Reina,Two-loop master integrals for leading-color pp → ttH amplitudes with a light-quark loop, JHEP 07 (2024) 084, [2312.08131]

    2024 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Agarwal, G

    B. Agarwal, G. Heinrich, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, S. Y. Klein, J. Lang et al.,Two-loop amplitudes for ttH production: the quark-initiated Nf-part, JHEP 05 (2024) 013, [2402.03301]

    2024 arXiv

  103. [111]

    J. M. Henn, A. Matijašić, J. Miczajka, T. Peraro, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang,A computation of two-loop six-point Feynman integrals in dimensional regularization, JHEP 08 (2024) 027, [2403.19742]

    2024 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Badger, M

    S. Badger, M. Becchetti, N. Giraudo and S. Zoia,Two-loop integrals fortt+jet production at hadron colliders in the leading colour approximation, JHEP 07 (2024) 073, [2404.12325]

    2024 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Jiang, J

    X. Jiang, J. Liu, X. Xu and L. L. Yang,Symbol letters of Feynman integrals from Gram determinants, 2401.07632

    arXiv

  106. [114]

    Abreu, D

    S. Abreu, D. Chicherin, V. Sotnikov and S. Zoia,Two-loop five-point two-mass planar integrals and double Lagrangian insertions in a Wilson loop, JHEP 10 (2024) 167, [2408.05201]

    2024 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Mitov and S

    A. Mitov and S. Moch,The Singular behavior of massive QCD amplitudes, JHEP 05 (2007) 001, [hep-ph/0612149]

    2007 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Hodges,Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes, JHEP 05 (2013) 135, [0905.1473]

    A. Hodges,Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes, JHEP 05 (2013) 135, [0905.1473]

    2013 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Badger,Automating QCD amplitudes with on-shell methods, J

    S. Badger,Automating QCD amplitudes with on-shell methods, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.762 (2016) 012057, [1605.02172]

    2016 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Badger, J

    S. Badger, J. Henn, J. C. Plefka and S. Zoia,Scattering Amplitudes in Quantum Field Theory, Lect. Notes Phys. 1021 (2024) pp., [2306.05976]

    2024 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Mondini and C

    R. Mondini and C. Williams,H → bbj at next-to-next-to-leading order accuracy, JHEP 06 (2019) 120, [1904.08961]

    2019 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Catani,The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order, Phys

    S. Catani,The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order, Phys. Lett. B427 (1998) 161–171, [hep-ph/9802439]

    1998 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. Neubert,On the Structure of Infrared Singularities of Gauge-Theory Amplitudes, JHEP 06 (2009) 081, [0903.1126]

    2009 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. Neubert,Infrared singularities of scattering amplitudes in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.102 (2009) 162001, [0901.0722]

    2009 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Gardi and L

    E. Gardi and L. Magnea,Factorization constraints for soft anomalous dimensions in QCD scattering amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2009) 079, [0901.1091]

    2009 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Peraro and L

    T. Peraro and L. Tancredi,Physical projectors for multi-leg helicity amplitudes, JHEP 07 (2019) 114, [1906.03298]

    2019 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Peraro and L

    T. Peraro and L. Tancredi,Tensor decomposition for bosonic and fermionic scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 054042, [2012.00820]. – 33 –

    2021 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Nogueira,Automatic Feynman Graph Generation, J

    P. Nogueira,Automatic Feynman Graph Generation, J. Comput. Phys.105 (1993) 279–289

    1993

  119. [127]

    Kuipers, T

    J. Kuipers, T. Ueda, J. A. M. Vermaseren and J. Vollinga,FORM version 4.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1453–1467, [1203.6543]

    2013 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Ruijl, T

    B. Ruijl, T. Ueda and J. Vermaseren,FORM version 4.2, 1707.06453

    arXiv

  121. [129]

    F. V. Tkachov,A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions, Phys. Lett. B100 (1981) 65–68

    1981

  122. [130]

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov,Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculateβ-functions in 4 loops, Nucl. Phys. B 192 (1981) 159–204

    1981

  123. [131]

    Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int

    S. Laporta,High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15 (2000) 5087–5159, [hep-ph/0102033]

    2000 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Z. Wu, J. Boehm, R. Ma, H. Xu and Y. Zhang,NeatIBP 1.0, a package generating small-size integration-by-parts relations for Feynman integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun.295 (2024) 108999, [2305.08783]

    2024 arXiv

  125. [133]

    K. J. Larsen and Y. Zhang,Integration-by-parts reductions from unitarity cuts and algebraic geometry, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 041701, [1511.01071]

    2016 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Zhang,Lecture Notes on Multi-loop Integral Reduction and Applied Algebraic Geometry, 12,

    Y. Zhang,Lecture Notes on Multi-loop Integral Reduction and Applied Algebraic Geometry, 12,

  127. [135]

    R. N. Lee,Presenting LiteRed: a tool for the Loop InTEgrals REDuction, 1212.2685

    arXiv

  128. [136]

    J. M. Henn,Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 251601, [1304.1806]

    2013 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Badger, J

    S. Badger, J. Kryś, R. Moodie and S. Zoia,Lepton-pair scattering with an off-shell and an on-shell photon at two loops in massless QED, JHEP 11 (2023) 041, [2307.03098]

    2023 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Bendle, J

    D. Bendle, J. Boehm, M. Heymann, R. Ma, M. Rahn, L. Ristau et al.,pfd-parallel, a Singular/GPI-Space package for massively parallel multivariate partial fractioning, Comput. Phys. Commun. 294 (2024) 108942, [2104.06866]

    2024 arXiv

  131. [139]

    H. B. Hartanto, S. Badger, C. Brønnum-Hansen and T. Peraro,A numerical evaluation of planar two-loop helicity amplitudes for a W-boson plus four partons, JHEP 09 (2019) 119, [1906.11862]

    2019 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Badger, E

    S. Badger, E. Chaubey, H. B. Hartanto and R. Marzucca,Two-loop leading colour QCD helicity amplitudes for top quark pair production in the gluon fusion channel, JHEP 06 (2021) 163, [2102.13450]

    2021 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Buccioni, J.-N

    F. Buccioni, J.-N. Lang, J. M. Lindert, P. Maierhöfer, S. Pozzorini, H. Zhang et al.,OpenLoops 2, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 866, [1907.13071]

    2019 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Full-colour double-virtual amplitudes for associated production of a Higgs boson with a bottom-quark pair at the LHC

    S. Badger, H. B. Hartanto, R. Poncelet, Z. Wu, Y. Zhang and S. Zoia,Ancillary files for “Full-colour double-virtual amplitudes for associated production of a Higgs boson with a bottom-quark pair at the LHC”, 12, 2024. 10.5281/zenodo.14328503

    2024 doi

  135. [143]

    libqd: quad-double / double-double computation package

    X. S. L. Y. Hida and D. H. Bailey, “libqd: quad-double / double-double computation package.” www.davidhbailey.com/dhbsoftware, 2010. – 34 –

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.