Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Quantum geometric tensor and wavepacket dynamics in two-dimensional non-Hermitian systems

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives the non-Hermitian generalization of the semiclassical wave-packet equation of motion and shows that the right-right quantum geometric tensor controls field-induced positional shifts and Berry-curvature corrections…

desk verdict A careful derivation of second-order non-Hermitian QGT corrections whose own numerics reveal a missing first-order term in the anomalous Berry connection, so the central claim outruns the evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08141 v2 pith:4XTP2E37 submitted 2024-12-11 cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph

Y.-M. Robin Hu , Elena A. Ostrovskaya , Eliezer Estrecho This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords quantumgeometrictensornon-Hermitiansystemswave-packetdynamicsBerrycurvaturemetricperturbationtheoryexcitonpolaritonsanomalousHalldrift
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks which of the two proposed generalizations of the quantum geometric tensor governs wave-packet motion in two-band systems with gain and loss. It derives the non-Hermitian counterpart of the standard semiclassical equation of motion for a narrow wave packet, including first-order perturbative corrections from interband mixing. The result shows that both generalizations are physical: the right-right (RR) tensor produces the field-induced positional shift and corrections to the anomalous Hall velocity, while the left-right (LR) quantum metric enters the geometric phase. The authors confirm the improved accuracy of the equation by simulating exciton-polariton wave packets in a semiconductor microcavity, where the relevant geometric quantities can be measured. If correct, this settles the earlier dispute over which QGT definition is the right one: each appears in a different dynamical role.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the first-order perturbative expansion of the perturbed right eigenstate, Eq. (10): $|\tilde{u}^R_0\rangle = |u^R_0\rangle - \frac{F\cdot A^{LR}_{10}}{\epsilon_0-\epsilon_1}|u^R_1\rangle$, with $A^{LR}_{10}=\langle u^L_1|i\partial_k u^R_0\rangle$ the left-right inter-band Berry connection. This expansion is inserted into the centre-of-mass position and the Schrödinger equation under the narrow-wave-packet approximation, producing the corrected connections (12), (13) and the corrected curvature (14). The complex denominator $\epsilon_1-\epsilon_0$ is the mechanism that distributes the corrections: its real part weights the RR quantum metric, its imaginary part couples the RR Berry curvature and the imaginary parts of the LR quantities, and both parts vanish in the Hermitian limit or on the imaginary Fermi arc.

What would settle it

Track a polariton wave packet under a controlled external force and measure its centre-of-mass $x$-displacement after a fixed time for several force magnitudes. The old equation (6) predicts a deviation from simulation that grows as $F^2$, while Eq. (11) predicts a residual growing as $F^3$; observing no $F^3$ term, or observing that the trajectory still follows Eq. (11) after the packet crosses the imaginary Fermi arc, would falsify the corrected equation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Equation (11) is the central result: it is the non-Hermitian generalization of the Hermitian semiclassical equation of motion (5), and Eqs. (12)-(14) give the first-order corrections to the Berry connections and Berry curvature. The paper establishes that, for a wave packet occupying the slower-decaying band, the field-induced positional shift and the Berry-curvature correction are controlled by the RR QGT $Q^{\mathrm{RR}}_0$, while the correction to the Berry phase is controlled by the LR QMT $g^{\mathrm{LR}}_0$. Because the corrections involve the complex energy gap $\epsilon_1-\epsilon_0$, new terms appear that have no Hermitian counterpart: for example, the imaginary part of the gap couples the RR Berry curvature to the motion, and both real and imaginary parts of the LR QMT enter. In the Hermitian limit the equation and its corrections reduce to the known result (5), and the two QGT formalisms are seen not as rivals but as descriptions of different physical observables.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the wave packet can be treated as a single band throughout its motion: it must remain in the eigenstate with the larger imaginary energy and must not cross the imaginary Fermi arc, where the loss rates of the two bands switch. If that condition fails, the two-level truncation and the first-order expansion in $F$ break down, and Eq. (11) no longer applies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The previously used first-order equation (6) is incomplete in the presence of finite force; deviations from it grow as $F^2$, whereas the new equation (11) leaves only $F^3$ deviations, so experiments with stronger acceleration or smaller gaps need the corrected terms.
  • Both QGT formalisms carry measurable content: the RR QGT can be extracted from field-induced positional shifts and anomalous Hall drifts, and the LR QMT from the field-induced correction to the Berry phase.
  • Corrections proportional to $\mathrm{Im}[\Delta\epsilon]$ mean the non-Hermitian geometric response changes strength away from the imaginary Fermi arc and vanishes on it, giving a tunable knob through the complex band structure.
  • In the exciton-polariton platform used for the numerical test, the same quantities—complex eigenenergies, QGT components, and anomalous Hall drift—are in principle experimentally accessible, so the improved equation is directly testable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could design a quantitative experiment that measures the wave-packet $x$-displacement after a fixed time for several force strengths; the predicted $F^3$ residual over Eq. (6) is a sharper signature than the trajectory plots alone.
  • The same perturbative machinery should carry over to multiband non-Hermitian systems, with sums over all other bands replacing the two-band gap; the separation of roles (RR for shifts and curvature, LR for phase) is likely to persist.
  • The dispute over whether the RR or LR QGT is 'ill-defined' may be recast: the useful question is not which tensor is fundamental but which observable each tensor couples to, and future definitions should specify the dynamical context.
  • Near but not across the imaginary Fermi arc, the complex gap suppresses high-order corrections, so the theory predicts a sharp crossover in validity as a trajectory crosses the arc; this could be probed in existing polariton experiments by steering the wave packet through the crossing point.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a semiclassical equation of motion for wave-packet center-of-mass dynamics in two-band non-Hermitian systems, including first-order perturbative corrections that are second order in the external force. The central result, Eq. (11), generalizes the Hermitian equation of motion and incorporates both right-right (RR) and left-right (LR) quantum geometric tensors. The authors verify the theory against split-step simulations of a two-dimensional exciton-polariton model with experimentally motivated parameters. The derivation is presented in the Supplemental Material, and the simulation data are deposited in a public repository.

Significance. If the derived equations are complete, the work would help resolve the ongoing debate about which quantum-geometric-tensor generalization governs non-Hermitian wave-packet dynamics, showing distinct roles for the RR and LR tensors. The use of an experimentally relevant exciton-polariton model and the public data deposit are strengths. However, the numerical verification in the SI reveals a missing linear-in-force contribution to the y-velocity, which leaves the central claim that Eq. (11) is the complete non-Hermitian generalization of Eq. (5) only partially supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [SI Section V (Additional data from simulation), Fig. S1(b)] The deviation in the y-component of the center-of-mass position between the numerical simulation and both the first-order equation (Eq. (6)) and the new equation (Eq. (11)) is linear in the external force F, as shown in Fig. S1(b). At fixed time, a position deviation proportional to F implies a missing velocity contribution of order F, i.e., a first-order-in-F term along the force direction. The SI explicitly states that "It would require a new theory to capture the correction to the non-Hermitian anomalous Berry connection, which is beyond the scope of this work." This directly contradicts the main-text claim that Eq. (11) is the non-Hermitian generalization of Eq. (5) and that Eqs. (12)-(14) completely capture the second-order-in-F dynamics. The central claim is therefore not fully supported by the paper's own numerical evidence.
  2. [Conclusion] The concluding statement that the results "settle the dispute" on which QGT generalization governs non-Hermitian dynamics is too strong given the missing linear-in-F contribution identified in Fig. S1(b). The incompleteness in the y-direction means that the roles of the LR QMT in the Berry-phase correction (Eq. (19)) and of the anomalous Berry connection in the positional shift (Eq. (18)) may not be fully captured. The conclusions should be moderated to state that both tensors contribute to the captured dynamics, while explicitly acknowledging the unaccounted term.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Results, Fig. 2] The main text states that the solution of Eq. (11) "gives a better fit" to the numerical results, but it does not mention that the y-deviation is essentially unchanged and linear in F, as shown in SI Fig. S1(b). The reader should be alerted to this limitation in the main text.
  2. [Introduction] There are several typographical errors, including "assopciated" in the first paragraph and "Brillouine" in the second paragraph.
  3. [Figure 2 caption] The caption reads "(a, d) The real-space trajectory" but the figure contains four panels (a)-(d); it should read "(a,b)" and "(c,d)" respectively.
  4. [References] Reference [89] contains a LaTeX artifact "/suppress" in the author list.
  5. [Eq. (6)] The phrase "non-Hermitian contribution" to describe the term F·(A_RR_00 - A_LR_00) is imprecise, as this term also affects the group velocity even in the presence of Hermitian-like dynamics; consider rephrasing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the Eq. (11) derivation is self-contained perturbation theory, the self-citations are contextual, and the SI's linear-in-F y-deviation is an admitted accuracy limitation rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The claimed derivation of Eqs. (11)-(14) is algebraic and self-contained: SI Sections I-II start from the biorthogonal first-order perturbation expansion of Ref. [79], compute the COM position from the normalized expectation value and the phase from the projected Schrodinger equation, and then identify the combinations that arise as the RR QGT and the symmetric LR QMT. The definitions of QRR and QLR in Eqs. (3)-(4) are stated before the dynamics, and their appearance in the final EOM is a derived result, not an assumed input. The self-citations [75,78] provide the polariton Hamiltonian, the experimental measurability context, and the single-band/Fermi-arc validity condition; that validity condition is also supported by external Refs. [58,72], so no load-bearing argument rests solely on a self-citation. The SI's explicit statement, "It would require a new theory to capture the correction to the non-Hermitian anomalous Berry connection, which is beyond the scope of this work," together with the linear-in-F deviation in y shown in Fig. S1, is flagged as a limitation: it indicates Eq. (11) is not fully validated at the claimed order in that direction, but this is a correctness/completeness concern, not evidence that the derivation's output was identical to its input by construction. No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's equations or citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theoretical claim relies on standard biorthogonal perturbation theory and the narrow-wavepacket approximation; the polariton model parameters are experimental inputs, not free parameters fitted to the target result, and the power-law fits in SI Fig. S1 are diagnostic only. No new entities are invented.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Biorthogonal normalization and completeness: <uL_n|uR_m> = delta_nm, sum_m |uR_m><uL_m| = I, with both <uL_n|uR_n> and <uR_n|uR_n> set to 1.
    Used in Eqs. (2)-(4) and SI Eqs. (S2), (S6) to rewrite the QGTs in terms of Berry connections; fails at exceptional points, which the paper avoids by considering gapped phases.
  • standard math First-order perturbation theory for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with complex energy denominators (Sternheim-Walker).
    Invoked in Eq. (10) to expand the dressed right eigenstate in powers of F; assumes |F.A^LR_10/(epsilon_0 - epsilon_1)| is small.
  • domain assumption Narrow wavepacket approximation |w(k,t)|^2 is approximately delta(k - kc).
    Used after Eq. (S12) to evaluate the COM position at kc; this is a standard semiclassical approximation.
  • domain assumption Single-band validity: wavepacket stays in the band with larger Im E and does not cross the imaginary Fermi arc.
    Stated in the Results around Eq. (10) and before the simulation; if violated, the band with largest gain changes and the two-level truncation breaks down.
  • domain assumption Constant external force F and slowly varying eigenstates over the wavepacket width.
    The Hamiltonian in Eq. (8) and the derivation assume F is uniform and the packet is narrow; used throughout the SI derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum geometric tensor and wavepacket dynamics in two-dimensional non-Hermitian systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4XTP2E37

@misc{pith2026241208141,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum geometric tensor and wavepacket dynamics in two-dimensional non-Hermitian systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4XTP2E37}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08141}
}
read the original abstract

The quantum geometric tensor (QGT) characterizes the local geometry of quantum states, and its components directly account for the dynamical effects observed, e.g., in condensed matter systems. In this work, we address the problem of extending the QGT formalism to non-Hermitian systems with gain and loss. In particular, we investigate a wave-packet dynamics in two-band non-Hermitian systems to elucidate how non-Hermiticity affects the definition of QGT. We employ first-order perturbation theory to account for non-adiabatic corrections due to interband mixing. Our results suggest that two different generalizations of the QGT, one defined using only the right eigenstates and the other one using both the left and right eigenstates, both play a significant role in wave-packet dynamics. We then determine the accuracy of the perturbative approach by simulating a wave-packet dynamics in a well studied physical non-Hermitian system -- exciton polaritons in a semiconductor microcavity. Our work aids deeper understanding of quantum geometry and dynamical behaviour in non-Hermitian systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08141 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The (a) real and (b) imaginary parts of the eigenen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a, d) The real-space trajectory of exciton-polariton [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Non-Hermitian wave-packet dynamics and its realization within a non-Hermitian chiral cavity

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper derives and numerically tests semiclassical equations of motion for wave packets in non-Hermitian topological systems, where complex Berry curvature produces an anomalous force as well as an anomalous velocity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Provost and G

    J. Provost and G. Vallee, Riemannian structure on man- ifolds of quantum states, Commun.Math. Phys. 76, 289 (1980)

    1980

  2. [2]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A , 45 (1984), https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1984.0023

    arXiv 1984

  3. [3]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure con- stant based on quantized Hall resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980). 6

    1980

  4. [4]

    R. B. Laughlin, Quantized Hall conductivity in two di- mensions, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5632 (1981)

    1981

  5. [5]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

    1982

  6. [6]

    J. E. Avron, R. Seiler, and B. Simon, Homotopy and quantization in condensed matter physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 51 (1983)

    1983

  7. [7]

    Q. Niu, D. J. Thouless, and Y.-S. Wu, Quantized Hall conductance as a topological invariant, Phys. Rev. B 31, 3372 (1985)

    1985

  8. [8]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

    2010

Show all 99 references
  1. [9]

    O. Bleu, D. D. Solnyshkov, and G. Malpuech, Measuring the quantum geometric tensor in two-dimensional pho- tonic and exciton-polariton systems, Phys. Rev. B 97, 195422 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Sundaram and Q

    G. Sundaram and Q. Niu, Wave-packet dynamics in slowly perturbed crystals: Gradient corrections and Berry-phase effects, Phys. Rev. B 59, 14915 (1999)

    1999

  3. [11]

    Culcer, Y

    D. Culcer, Y. Yao, and Q. Niu, Coherent wave-packet evolution in coupled bands, Phys. Rev. B 72, 085110 (2005)

    2005

  4. [12]

    Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field induced positional shift of Bloch electrons and its dynamical implications, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 166601 (2014)

    2014

  5. [13]

    Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Geometrical effects in orbital magnetic susceptibility, Phys. Rev. B 91, 214405 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    O. Bleu, G. Malpuech, Y. Gao, and D. D. Solnyshkov, Ef- fective theory of nonadiabatic quantum evolution based on the quantum geometric tensor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 020401 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Gianfrate, O

    A. Gianfrate, O. Bleu, L. Dominici, V. Ardizzone, M. De Giorgi, D. Ballarini, G. Lerario, K. W. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, D. D. Solnyshkov, D. Sanvitto, and G. Malpuech, Measurement of the quantum geometric tensor and of the anomalous Hall drift, Nature 578, 381 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry phase, hyperorbits, and the Hofstadter spectrum: Semiclassical dynamics in mag- netic Bloch bands, Phys. Rev. B 53, 7010 (1996)

    1996

  9. [17]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry curvature, orbital mo- ment, and effective quantum theory of electrons in elec- tromagnetic fields, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter 20, 193202 (2008)

    2008

  10. [18]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nature Communications 6, 8944 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    H. Tian, X. Gao, Y. Zhang, S. Che, T. Xu, P. Che- ung, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Randeria, F. Zhang, C. N. Lau, and M. W. Bockrath, Evidence for Dirac flat band superconductivity enabled by quantum geometry, Nature 614, 440 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    S. A. Chen and K. T. Law, Ginzburg-Landau theory of flat-band superconductors with quantum metric, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 026002 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Jozsa, Fidelity for mixed quantum states, Journal of Modern Optics 41, 2315 (1994), https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349414552171

    R. Jozsa, Fidelity for mixed quantum states, Journal of Modern Optics 41, 2315 (1994), https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349414552171

    1994 doi

  14. [22]

    Gu, Fidelity approach to quan- tum phase transitions, International Jour- nal of Modern Physics B 24, 4371 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979210056335

    S.-J. Gu, Fidelity approach to quan- tum phase transitions, International Jour- nal of Modern Physics B 24, 4371 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979210056335

    2010 doi

  15. [23]

    Wang, Y.-H

    L. Wang, Y.-H. Liu, J. Imriˇ ska, P. N. Ma, and M. Troyer, Fidelity susceptibility made simple: A unified quantum Monte Carlo approach, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031007 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Wei and X.-C

    B.-B. Wei and X.-C. Lv, Fidelity susceptibility in the quantum Rabi model, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013845 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    N. A. Khan, Fidelity susceptibility probes of dynami- cal quantum criticality, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 183, 114975 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996)

    1996

  19. [27]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non- Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998)

    1998

  20. [28]

    C. M. Bender, S. Boettcher, and P. N. Meisinger, PT-symmetric quantum mechan- ics, Journal of Mathematical Physics 40, 2201 (1999), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article- pdf/40/5/2201/19231175/2201 1 online.pdf

    1999

  21. [29]

    D. C. Brody, Biorthogonal quantum mechanics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 47, 035305 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nature Physics14, 11 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Ghatak and T

    A. Ghatak and T. Das, New topological invariants in non- Hermitian systems, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter 31, 263001 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Ex- ceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    K.¨Ozdemir, S

    S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity– time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Na- ture Materials 18, 783 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non- Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Sym- metry and topology in non-Hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026808 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Leykam, K

    D. Leykam, K. Y. Bliokh, C. Huang, Y. D. Chong, and F. Nori, Edge modes, degeneracies, and topological num- bers in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 040401 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non- Hermitian boundary modes and topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 056802 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Correspondence be- tween winding numbers and skin modes in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 126402 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Universal non- Hermitian skin effect in two and higher dimensions, Na- ture Communications 13, 2496 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    C. H. Lee and R. Thomale, Anatomy of skin modes and topology in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 99, 201103 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Pernet, P

    N. Pernet, P. St-Jean, D. D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, N. Carlon Zambon, Q. Fontaine, B. Real, O. Jamadi, 7 A. Lema ˆ ıtre, M. Morassi, L. Le Gratiet, T. Baptiste, A. Harouri, I. Sagnes, A. Amo, S. Ravets, and J. Bloch, Gap solitons in a one-dimensional driven-dissipative topol...

    2022

  35. [43]

    Kokhanchik, D

    P. Kokhanchik, D. Solnyshkov, and G. Malpuech, Non- Hermitian skin effect induced by Rashba-Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B 108, L041403 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Manna and B

    S. Manna and B. Roy, Inner skin effects on non- Hermitian topological fractals, Communications Physics 6, 10 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    E. M. Graefe, H. J. Korsch, and A. E. Niederle, Mean- field dynamics of a non-Hermitian Bose-Hubbard dimer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 150408 (2008)

    2008

  38. [46]

    Liang, D

    Q. Liang, D. Xie, Z. Dong, H. Li, H. Li, B. Gadway, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Dynamic signatures of non-Hermitian skin effect and topology in ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 070401 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Weidemann, M

    S. Weidemann, M. Kremer, T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, A. Stegmaier, M. Greiter, R. Thomale, and A. Szameit, Topological funneling of light, Science 368, 311 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    Longhi, Non-Hermitian skin effect and self- acceleration, Phys

    S. Longhi, Non-Hermitian skin effect and self- acceleration, Phys. Rev. B 105, 245143 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Guria, Q

    C. Guria, Q. Zhong, S. K. Ozdemir, Y. S. S. Patil, R. El- Ganainy, and J. G. E. Harris, Resolving the topology of encircling multiple exceptional points, Nature Communi- cations 15, 1369 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Zhong, K

    J. Zhong, K. Wang, Y. Park, V. Asadchy, C. C. Wojcik, A. Dutt, and S. Fan, Nontrivial point-gap topology and non-Hermitian skin effect in photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. B 104, 125416 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Zhong, C

    J. Zhong, C. C. Wojcik, D. Cheng, and S. Fan, Numer- ical and theoretical study of eigenenergy braids in two- dimensional photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. B 108, 195413 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Ghatak, M

    A. Ghatak, M. Brandenbourger, J. van Wezel, and C. Coulais, Observation of non-hermitian topol- ogy and its bulk–edge correspondence in an ac- tive mechanical metamaterial, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 29561 (2020), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/...

    2020 doi

  45. [53]

    Hofmann, T

    T. Hofmann, T. Helbig, F. Schindler, N. Salgo, M. Brzezi´ nska, M. Greiter, T. Kiessling, D. Wolf, A. Voll- hardt, A. Kabaˇ si, C. H. Lee, A. Biluˇ si´ c, R. Thomale, and T. Neupert, Reciprocal skin effect and its realization in a topolectrical circuit, Phys. Rev. Research 2, ...

    2020

  46. [54]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Non-Hermitian topology of spontaneous magnon decay, Phys. Rev. B 100, 100405 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    T. Yu, J. Zou, B. Zeng, J. Rao, and K. Xia, Non- hermitian topological magnonics, Physics Reports 1062, 1 (2024), non-Hermitian topological magnonics

    2024

  48. [56]

    K. Yang, D. Varjas, E. J. Bergholtz, S. Morampudi, and F. Wilczek, Exceptional dynamics of interacting spin liq- uids, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L042025 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    T. Gao, G. Li, E. Estrecho, T. C. H. Liew, D. Comber- Todd, A. Nalitov, M. Steger, K. West, L. Pfeiffer, D. W. Snoke, A. V. Kavokin, A. G. Truscott, and E. A. Ostro- vskaya, Chiral Modes at Exceptional Points in Exciton- Polariton Quantum Fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 065301 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    R. Su, E. Estrecho, D. Biega´ nska, Y. Huang, M. Wur- dack, M. Pieczarka, A. G. Truscott, T. C. H. Liew, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and Q. Xiong, Direct measurement of a non-Hermitian topological invariant in a hybrid light- matter system, Science Advances 7, eabj8905 (2021), https://...

    2021 doi

  51. [59]

    D. D. Solnyshkov, C. Leblanc, L. Bessonart, A. Nalitov, J. Ren, Q. Liao, F. Li, and G. Malpuech, Quantum metric and wave packets at exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125302 (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    Q. Liao, C. Leblanc, J. Ren, F. Li, Y. Li, D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, J. Yao, and H. Fu, Experimental measure- ment of the divergent quantum metric of an exceptional point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 107402 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    Cuerda, J

    J. Cuerda, J. M. Taskinen, N. K¨ allman, L. Grabitz, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Pseudospin-orbit coupling and non-Hermitian effects in the quantum geometric tensor of a plasmonic lattice, Phys. Rev. B 109, 165439 (2024)

    2024

  54. [62]

    Cuerda, J

    J. Cuerda, J. M. Taskinen, N. K¨ allman, L. Grabitz, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Observation of quantum metric and non- Hermitian Berry curvature in a plasmonic lattice, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022020 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    Matsumoto, K

    N. Matsumoto, K. Kawabata, Y. Ashida, S. Furukawa, and M. Ueda, Continuous phase transition without gap closing in non-Hermitian quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260601 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    B. Alon, R. Ilan, and M. Goldstein, Quantum metric de- pendent anomalous velocity in systems subject to com- plex electric fields, Phys. Rev. B 110, 245103 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    D. C. Brody and E.-M. Graefe, Information geometry of complex Hamiltonians and exceptional points, Entropy 15, 3361 (2013)

    2013

  58. [66]

    Zhang, Q.-h

    D.-J. Zhang, Q.-h. Wang, and J. Gong, Quantum geomet- ric tensor in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. A 99, 042104 (2019)

    2019

  59. [67]

    Y.-Q. Zhu, W. Zheng, S.-L. Zhu, and G. Palumbo, Band topology of pseudo-Hermitian phases through ten- sor Berry connections and quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B 104, 205103 (2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    Tzeng, C.-Y

    Y.-C. Tzeng, C.-Y. Ju, G.-Y. Chen, and W.-M. Huang, Hunting for the non-Hermitian exceptional points with fidelity susceptibility, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013015 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    G. H. A. Fan and S. Liang, Complex Berry curvature pair and quantum Hall admittance in non-Hermitian systems, Journal of Physics Communications 4, 115006 (2020)

    2020

  62. [70]

    Chen Ye, W

    C. Chen Ye, W. L. Vleeshouwers, S. Heatley, V. Gritsev, and C. Morais Smith, Quantum metric of non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023202 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    Xu, S.-T

    Y. Xu, S.-T. Wang, and L.-M. Duan, Weyl exceptional rings in a three-dimensional dissipative cold atomic gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 045701 (2017)

    2017

  64. [72]

    Silberstein, J

    N. Silberstein, J. Behrends, M. Goldstein, and R. Ilan, Berry connection induced anomalous wave-packet dy- namics in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 102, 245147 (2020)

    2020

  65. [73]

    Wang, Y.-L

    J.-H. Wang, Y.-L. Tao, and Y. Xu, Anomalous transport induced by non-Hermitian anomalous Berry connection in non-Hermitian systems, Chin. Phys. Lett. 39, 010301 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 299 (2013)

    2013

  67. [75]

    Y.-M. R. Hu, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and E. Estrecho, Gen- eralized quantum geometric tensor in a non-Hermitian exciton-polariton system [invited], Opt. Mater. Express 14, 664 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    Pi´ echon, A

    F. Pi´ echon, A. Raoux, J.-N. Fuchs, and G. Montambaux, 8 Geometric orbital susceptibility: Quantum metric with- out Berry curvature, Phys. Rev. B 94, 134423 (2016)

    2016

  69. [77]

    Leblanc, G

    C. Leblanc, G. Malpuech, and D. D. Solnyshkov, Univer- sal semiclassical equations based on the quantum metric for a two-band system, Phys. Rev. B 104, 134312 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    Y.-M. R. Hu, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and E. Estrecho, Wave- packet dynamics in a non-Hermitian exciton-polariton system, Phys. Rev. B 108, 115404 (2023)

    2023

  71. [79]

    M. M. Sternheim and J. F. Walker, Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, decaying states, and perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. C 6, 114 (1972)

    1972

  72. [80]

    T. Gao, E. Estrecho, K. Y. Bliokh, T. C. H. Liew, M. D. Fraser, S. Brodbeck, M. Kamp, C. Schneider, S. H¨ ofling, Y. Yamamoto, F. Nori, Y. S. Kivshar, A. G. Truscott, R. G. Dall, and E. A. Ostrovskaya, Observation of non- Hermitian degeneracies in a chaotic exciton-polariton b...

    2015

  73. [81]

    J. A. Weideman and B. M. Herbst, Split-step methods for the solution of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 23, 485 (1986)

    1986

  74. [82]

    T. R. Taha and X. Xu, Parallel split-step Fourier meth- ods for the coupled nonlinear Schr¨ odinger type equations, The Journal of Supercomputing 32, 5 (2005)

    2005

  75. [83]

    Ter¸ cas, H

    H. Ter¸ cas, H. Flayac, D. D. Solnyshkov, and G. Malpuech, Non-Abelian gauge fields in photonic cav- ities and photonic superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 066402 (2014)

    2014

  76. [84]

    Y.-M. R. Hu, E. Ostrovskaya, and E. Estrecho, Data of wavepacket cntre-of-mass motion in figure 2, 10.5281/zenodo.14523051 (2024)

    2024 doi

  77. [85]

    Steger, C

    M. Steger, C. Gautham, D. W. Snoke, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Slow reflection and two-photon generation of microcavity exciton–polaritons, Optica 2, 1 (2015)

    2015

  78. [86]

    E. S. Sedov, Y. G. Rubo, and A. V. Kavokin, Zitterbewegung of exciton-polaritons, Phys. Rev. B 97, 245312 (2018)

    2018

  79. [87]

    Klembt, T

    S. Klembt, T. H. Harder, O. A. Egorov, K. Winkler, R. Ge, M. A. Bandres, M. Emmerling, L. Worschech, T. C. H. Liew, M. Segev, C. Schneider, and S. H¨ ofling, Exciton-polariton topological insulator, Nature 562, 552 (2018)

    2018

  80. [88]

    Polimeno, G

    L. Polimeno, G. Lerario, M. De Giorgi, L. De Marco, L. Dominici, F. Todisco, A. Coriolano, V. Ardizzone, M. Pugliese, C. T. Prontera, V. Maiorano, A. Moliterni, C. Giannini, V. Olieric, G. Gigli, D. Ballarini, Q. Xiong, A. Fieramosca, D. D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, and D. Sanv...

    2021

  81. [89]

    /suppress Lempicka-Mirek, M

    K. /suppress Lempicka-Mirek, M. Kr´ ol, H. Sigurdsson, A. Win- cukiewicz, P. Morawiak, R. Mazur, M. Muszy´ nski, W. Piecek, P. Kula, T. Stefaniuk, M. Kami´ nska, L. D. Marco, P. G. Lagoudakis, D. Ballarini, D. Sanvitto, J. Szczytko, and B. Pietka, Electrically tunable Berry cu...

    2022

  82. [90]

    Bhalla, K

    P. Bhalla, K. Das, D. Culcer, and A. Agarwal, Resonant second-harmonic generation as a probe of quantum ge- ometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 227401 (2022)

    2022

  83. [91]

    K. Das, S. Lahiri, R. B. Atencia, D. Culcer, and A. Agar- wal, Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B 108, L201405 (2023)

    2023

  84. [92]

    N. Wang, D. Kaplan, Z. Zhang, T. Holder, N. Cao, A. Wang, X. Zhou, F. Zhou, Z. Jiang, C. Zhang, S. Ru, H. Cai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Yan, and W. Gao, Quantum-metric-induced nonlinear transport in a topo- logical antiferromagnet, Nature 621, 487 (2023). Supplementary Ma...

    2023 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Quantum geometric tensor in PT -symmetric quantum mechanics

    Da-Jian Zhang, Qing-hai Wang, and Jiangbin Gong. Quantum geometric tensor in PT -symmetric quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A , 99:042104, Apr 2019

    2019

  86. [94]

    Sternheim and James F

    Morton M. Sternheim and James F. Walker. Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, decaying states, and perturbation theory. Phys. Rev. C, 6:114–121, Jul 1972

    1972

  87. [95]

    Yang, and Qian Niu

    Yang Gao, Shengyuan A. Yang, and Qian Niu. Field induced positional shift of Bloch electrons and its dynamical implica- tions. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 112:166601, Apr 2014

    2014

  88. [96]

    Yang, and Qian Niu

    Yang Gao, Shengyuan A. Yang, and Qian Niu. Geometrical effects in orbital magnetic susceptibility. Phys. Rev. B , 91:214405, Jun 2015

    2015

  89. [97]

    Yong Xu, Sheng-Tao Wang, and L.-M. Duan. Weyl exceptional rings in a three-dimensional dissipative cold atomic gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 118:045701, Jan 2017

    2017

  90. [98]

    Anomalous transport induced by non-Hermitian anomalous Berry connection in non-Hermitian systems

    Jiong-Hao Wang, Yu-Liang Tao, and Yong Xu. Anomalous transport induced by non-Hermitian anomalous Berry connection in non-Hermitian systems. Chin. Phys. Lett. , 39:010301, 2022

    2022

  91. [99]

    Data of the wave-packet centre-of-mass positions used in fig

    Yow-Ming Robin Hu, Elena Ostrovskaya, and Eliezer Estrecho. Data of the wave-packet centre-of-mass positions used in fig. 1 in supplementary material - quantum geometric tensor and wavepacket dynamics in two- dimensional non-hermitian systems, February 2025

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.