Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Local electronic properties of La3Ni2O7 under pressure

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Nickel's valence and spin state in La3Ni2O7 stay fixed up to 30 GPa, the paper reports, ruling out pressure-driven spin transitions as the cause of its superconductivity.

desk verdict Useful in-situ XAS/XES result fixing the ambient Ni valence and LS spin state in La3Ni2O7, but the abstract overreaches on the pressure range of the direct spin probe. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08269 v1 pith:H6CYPTPI submitted 2024-12-11 cond-mat.supr-con

Emin Mijit , Peiyue Ma , Christoph J. Sahle , Angelika D.Rosa , Zhiwei Hu , Francesco De Angelis , Alberto Lopez , Simone Amatori
show 9 more authors
Georghii Tchoudinov Yves Joly Tetsuo Irifune Joao Elias F. S. Rodrigues Gaston Garbarino Samuel Gallego Parra Meng Wang Runze Yu Olivier Mathon
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords La3Ni2O7nickelatesuperconductorX-rayabsorptionspectroscopyemissionhighpressurespinstatenickelvalencechargetransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses X-ray absorption and X-ray emission spectroscopy on the high-temperature superconductor La3Ni2O7 to pin down the local electronic state of nickel across the pressure and temperature range that includes its superconducting phase. The authors find that nickel ions carry an average valence of about 2.53+ and are in a low-spin (S = 1/2) ground state with strong charge-transfer character, and that this configuration remains unchanged up to 30 GPa and down to 10 K. If correct, the result eliminates a whole class of theoretical models that explain superconductivity in this material through pressure-induced spin transitions or valence changes, and redirects attention to other mechanisms such as bandwidth or interlayer coupling.

What carries the argument

The central objects are Ni K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and Ni Kβ X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES), measured in a diamond anvil cell across multiple pressure and temperature runs. The decisive comparison is the energy shift of the Ni K absorption edge versus Ni–O bond contraction in La3Ni2O7, benchmarked against NiO (a stable Ni2+ compound), to separate structural from electronic contributions to the edge shift. The pre-edge peak, originating from dipole transitions to hybridized 3d/4p states, serves as a valence-sensitive feature that does not move under pressure, and the Kβ1,3 and Kβ2,5 emission lines serve as spin-state and charge-transfer fingerprints, respectively.

What would settle it

A clear falsifier would be a high-pressure measurement on a nickelate that is known to undergo a valence transition (e.g., a rare-earth nickelate with a pressure-driven Ni3+/Ni2+ charge disproportionation) using the same edge-shift versus bond-contraction analysis; if that known valence change does not produce an extra edge shift beyond the structural trend, then the NiO-based transferability assumption in this paper would be invalid, and the observed +0.5 to +0.8 eV shift in La3Ni2O7 could reflect a real valence change. Alternatively, a direct measurement of the nickel valence under pressure via core-level photoemission or high-pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy would settle the point without relying on the NiO comparison.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that Ni ions in La3Ni2O7 sit in a low-spin (S = 1/2) configuration with an average valence of approximately 2.5+, and that both the valence and spin state remain strictly stable across the investigated pressure range (up to 30 GPa) and temperature range (down to 10 K). This conclusion rests on two spectroscopic observations: the Ni K-edge XANES pre-edge peak does not shift in energy under pressure, and the Kβ XES emission spectrum matches that of low-spin LaNiO3 rather than high-spin NiO, with no pressure-induced changes in the main emission lines or the valence-to-core Kβ2,5 satellite. The paper therefore explicitly rules out previously proposed pressure-induced spin transition scenarios, including both low-spin to high-spin and high-spin to low-spin transitions.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that nickel valence does not change under pressure rests on the assumption that the relation between Ni K-edge energy shift and Ni–O bond contraction measured in NiO applies equally to La3Ni2O7, despite the two materials having different crystal structures and coordination distortions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Theoretical models that invoke a pressure-driven spin-state crossover (e.g., S = 1 to S = 1/2 or S = 1/2 to S = 3/2) to explain superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 are excluded by these data.
  • The local nickel valence stays fixed at approximately 2.5+ throughout the superconducting dome, meaning the electron filling of the 3dx2−y2 and 3dz2 orbitals does not change with pressure.
  • The persistence of the charge-transfer character (substantial 3d8L contribution) under pressure indicates that strong oxygen 2p–nickel 3d hybridization is an intrinsic feature of the superconducting state.
  • The observed Ni K-edge energy shift with pressure is reinterpreted as a purely structural effect tied to bond contraction, not an electronic oxidation change.
  • The pressure-induced enhancement of the XANES feature C, linked to apical oxygen scattering, suggests that interlayer or apical-oxygen geometry changes, rather than valence changes, accompany the onset of superconductivity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural consequence the authors leave implicit is that superconductivity in this material must be driven by changes in bandwidth, interlayer coupling, or orbital hybridization, rather than by a collapse or change of the local nickel moment.
  • A direct experimental test of the constant-valence conclusion would be high-pressure resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) to measure d–d excitations and confirm the S = 1/2 ground state independently of Kβ lineshape analysis.
  • The edge-shift versus bond-contraction comparison assumes that the structural contribution to the Ni K-edge shift is transferable from NiO to La3Ni2O7; verifying this on a nickelate with a known pressure-induced valence transition would strengthen the claim.
  • The slight increase in pre-edge intensity under pressure, attributed to enhanced orbital hybridization, could be probed by polarized XAS on oriented samples to see whether the hybridization change is confined to specific Ni–O directions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports Ni K-edge XAS, Ni Kβ XES, and La L3-edge XAS measurements on polycrystalline La3Ni2O7 under pressures up to about 20–25 GPa and temperatures down to 10 K. At ambient conditions, the Ni K-edge energy lies between NiO and LaNiO3, giving an average Ni valence of about 2.53+; the Kβ XES main-line shape overlaps LaNiO3, indicating a low-spin S=1/2 ground state with substantial charge-transfer character. Under compression, the Ni K edge shifts to higher energy while pre-edge peak A remains at nearly fixed energy; the authors attribute the edge shift to lattice contraction by comparing with compressed NiO. Kβ XES shows no main-line shape change up to 19.5 GPa. FDMNES cluster-size simulations reproduce the local origin of pre-edge peak A and the pressure-enhanced feature C via apical oxygens. The authors conclude that the Ni oxidation and spin states remain unchanged across the superconducting region.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper would rule out pressure-induced spin-state and valence changes in La3Ni2O7 and materially constrain theoretical models that invoke spin-state transitions or valence fluctuations under pressure. The ambient determination—average Ni valence ~2.53+ and low-spin S=1/2 with 3d8L character—is a valuable reference point. The analysis is genuinely reference-based rather than circular: the ambient assignments use external NiO and LaNiO3 references, and the FDMNES simulations are not fit to the target spectra. The main weaknesses are that the direct spin probe does not cover the full pressure-temperature range claimed in the abstract, and the constant-valence conclusion depends on an unvalidated transferability of the NiO structural edge-shift baseline to La3Ni2O7.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; §Under high pressure; Fig. 3] The abstract's claim that the spin state is stable 'up to 30 GPa and down to 10 K' is not supported by the reported data. The direct spin probe, Ni Kβ XES, was measured only up to 19.5 GPa (Fig. 3), and no low-temperature XES data are presented; the 10 K measurements in Fig. 4 are Ni K-edge XANES, which is not a direct spin-state probe. The Conclusion also states a different pressure bound (about 25 GPa) for the oxidation state. Please either present the missing high-pressure/low-temperature XES data or restrict the spin-stability claim to the measured 19.5 GPa and remove the 'down to 10 K' qualifier from the spin claim unless XES data at 10 K exist.
  2. [§Under high pressure; Fig. 5(b); FDMNES simulations] The constant-valence conclusion relies on the assumption that the Ni K-edge structural shift versus Ni-O bond contraction measured in NiO (Fig. 5b) is transferable to La3Ni2O7. This assumption is not established: the two materials differ in Ni site symmetry (Oh versus C4v), in the distribution of Ni-O bond lengths, and in the apical-oxygen and Madelung/multiple-scattering environment. A direct FDMNES calculation of the Ni K-edge energy for the I4/mmm phase as a function of lattice compression is needed; the present simulations address features A and C at one pressure (23.7 GPa) but do not address the pressure dependence of E0. Without such a check, the +0.5 to +0.8 eV edge shift in Figs. 4(b,c) could include a real valence increase. The stability of pre-edge peak A within the stated ±0.1 eV does not exclude this, because a ~0.1 valence change would produce a shift of the same order as the experimental uncertainty and no calibration of pre-edge shift versus valence is provided.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Conclusions] The sentence 'Contrary to the findings in this paper, we did not observe noticeable changes in the oxidation and spin state in LaNiO3 within the investigated P-T range' is internally inconsistent, since no high-pressure LaNiO3 data are reported; it presumably refers to ref. [62] and to La3Ni2O7, and should be reworded accordingly or deleted.
  2. [Results; Experiments and Methods] The numbering of experimental runs is inconsistent: the pressure-dependent XES data are called run-1 in the Results text but run-6 in the Methods section; please harmonize the run labels across the paper and figure captions.
  3. [Fig. 5(b)] Please specify the source of the Ni-O bond contractions used in Fig. 5(b) for both La3Ni2O7 and NiO (measured in this work or taken from the literature), and define how the error bars in that figure were obtained.
  4. [Experiments and Methods; Fig. 3] The high-pressure XES data in Fig. 3 were collected in a panoramic DAC without a pressure-transmitting medium; please discuss the possible effect of non-hydrostatic stress on the spectra and on the comparison with the quasi-hydrostatic XAS runs.
  5. [Results; Fig. 2] Please state whether the NiO and LaNiO3 reference spectra were collected with the same beamline setup and energy calibration as the La3Ni2O7 spectra, since the quantitative edge-shift and XES comparisons in Figs. 2 and 5 depend on this.
  6. [Throughout] There are a few typos in names and references, for example 'Lioa et al.' for Liao et al. and 'Labollia' for LaBollita in the Introduction; please proofread author names and citations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the valence and spin assignments are calibrated against external reference compounds and the high-pressure conclusion uses an independent NiO baseline, not a fit to the target data.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against external data, and no claim reduces to its own inputs by construction. Ambient Ni valence is obtained by linear interpolation between measured NiO (Ni2+) and LaNiO3 (Ni3+) K-edge positions (Fig. 2), an external calibration; the spin assignment is made by line-shape comparison of K-beta XES with LaNiO3 (S = 1/2) and NiO (S = 1), again external references. The pressure-invariance conclusion rests on: (i) stable K-beta line shapes up to 19.5 GPa, (ii) a measured NiO compression baseline showing the same edge-shift vs Ni-O bond-contraction rate, and (iii) FDMNES simulations using the published I4/mmm structure from XRD [38], with cluster-size variation rather than fitting to the observed spectra. None of these steps defines the conclusion into the premises. The self-citations (refs. [55,56] on pre-edge behavior under pressure) are supporting empirical observations from other transition-metal oxides, not a load-bearing theorem that forces the result. The unvalidated assumption that the NiO structural edge-shift baseline is transferable to La3Ni2O7 is a genuine correctness risk, but it is an external comparability assumption, not a circular reduction; disproving it would weaken the conclusion without making any equation self-referential.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on standard spectroscopic calibrations and published structural data rather than on new fitted parameters or new entities. The main assumptions are listed above.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Linear relationship between Ni K-edge energy and oxidation state
    Used to estimate average valence 2.53(5)+ from the edge position between NiO (Ni2+) and LaNiO3 (Ni3+); stated explicitly in the text near Fig. 2(a).
  • domain assumption Transferability of NiO edge-shift versus bond-contraction baseline to La3Ni2O7
    Used to separate structural and valence contributions to the pressure-induced edge shift in Fig. 5(b); if invalid, the constant-valence conclusion could fail.
  • domain assumption K-beta XES lineshape is a reliable spin-state fingerprint for octahedral Ni
    The assignment of LS S=1/2 relies on the near-overlap of La3Ni2O7 K-beta emission with LaNiO3 in Fig. 2(b).
  • domain assumption I4/mmm structure from ref [38] captures the local structure for FDMNES simulations
    Used to simulate XANES and assign feature C to apical oxygen scattering in Fig. 6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local electronic properties of La3Ni2O7 under pressure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H6CYPTPI

@misc{pith2026241208269,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local electronic properties of La3Ni2O7 under pressure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H6CYPTPI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08269}
}
abstract

The recent discovery of superconductivity in $\rm La_3Ni_2O_7$ has attracted significant attention due to its high critical temperature and analogy to cuprate oxides. The oxidation and spin states of Ni ions are among the most important local properties in this compound, extensively discussed in the context of its superconductivity. Despite their direct link to the electron filling configurations of the relevant $\rm 3d_{x^2-y^2}$ and $\rm 3d_{z^2}$ orbitals, these local electronic properties of $\rm La_3Ni_2O_7$ yet to be systematically investigated. In this work, we address this issue using x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and x-ray emission spectroscopy (XES) measurements under pressure. Comparison of Ni \textit{K}-edge XAS and $\rm K\beta$ XES with the reference spectra of $\rm NiO$ and $\rm LaNiO_3$ shows that Ni ions, with an average valence of $\sim 2.53+$, are in a low-spin ($\rm S = 1/2$) ground state under ambient conditions. High pressure XAS and XES data clearly show that the oxidation ($\sim 2.5+$) and spin ($\rm S = 1/2$) states of Ni ions remain stable across the investigated pressure (up to 30 GPa) and temperature (down to 10 K) ranges, ruling out previously proposed spin transition scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08269 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Both NiO and LaNiO3 have octahedral local structure and representative of HS Ni2+ (S = 1) and LS Ni3+ (S = 1/2) ions, respectively. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Experimental conditions and routes mapped onto the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Ni [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Ni [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Energy shift of Ni [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. La [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spin correlations in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ thin films

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    RIXS on strained La3Ni2O7 films shows the interlayer exchange Jz is enhanced under compressive strain (superconducting films) and suppressed under tensile strain, supporting spin-fluctuation-mediated interlayer pairing.

  2. Low-temperature mean valence of nickel ions in pressurized La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$

    cond-mat.supr-con 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Nickel valence in La3Ni2O7 stays close to 2.5+ from ambient pressure to 40 GPa at 20 K, so pressure-induced superconductivity is tied to a structural transition rather than a change in nickel charge.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    P. A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, and X.-G. Wen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17 (2006), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.17

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.78.17 2006

  2. [2]

    D. Li, K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Osada, S. Crossley, H. R. Lee, Y. Cui, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Nature572, 624 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    Osada, B

    M. Osada, B. Y. Wang, K. Lee, D. Li, and H. Y. Hwang, Physical Review Materials4, 121801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    G. A. Pan, D. Ferenc Segedin, H. LaBollita, Q. Song, E. M. Nica, B. H. Goodge, A. T. Pierce, S. Doyle, S. No- vakov, D. Córdova Carrizales, et al., Nature materials 21, 160 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    N. Wang, M. Yang, Z. Yang, K. Chen, H. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Uwatoko, L. Gu, X. Dong, et al., Nature communications 13, 4367 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Incident x-ray beam at 10 keV was monochro- matized using Si(111) monochromator and focused by a Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror to 10× 10 µm2 (FWHM) spot size

    have been performed at the ID20 beamline of ESRF [67, 68]. Incident x-ray beam at 10 keV was monochro- matized using Si(111) monochromator and focused by a Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror to 10× 10 µm2 (FWHM) spot size. Emission signal was collected at near-90◦ scattering angle with an energy-dispersive von Hamos-type spec- trometer [69]. Sample environment: High...

    work page

  7. [7]

    For the XES measurements underpressure(run-6), samplewasloadedinapanoramic DAC equipped with single crystal anvils of 500µm, with- out any pressure transmitting medium

    which were achieved mostly under quasi-hydrostatic conditions using solid PTMs. For the XES measurements underpressure(run-6), samplewasloadedinapanoramic DAC equipped with single crystal anvils of 500µm, with- out any pressure transmitting medium. XANES simulations: theoretical Ni K-edge XANES (x-ray absorption near edge structure) spectra were sim- ulat...

    work page

  8. [8]

    W. L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. 167, 331 (1968), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.167. 331

    doi:10.1103/physrev.167 1968

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z.Mao, P.Yang, B.Wang, etal., Nature621, 493(2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Pardo and W

    V. Pardo and W. E. Pickett, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics83, 245128 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    B 95, 214509 (2017), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.214509

    M.Nakata, D.Ogura, H.Usui, andK.Kuroki, Phys.Rev. B 95, 214509 (2017), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.214509

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. Wú, and D.-X. Yao, Phys- ical review letters131, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Sakakibara, K

    H. Sakakibara, K. Suzuki, H. Usui, S. Miyao, I. Maruyama, K. Kusakabe, R. Arita, H. Aoki, and K. Kuroki, Phys. Rev. B89, 224505 (2014), URLhttps: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.224505

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    J. Yang, H. Sun, X. Hu, Y. Xie, T. Miao, H. Luo, H. Chen, B. Liang, W. Zhu, G. Qu, et al., Nature Com- munications 15, 4373 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    X. Chen, J. Choi, Z. Jiang, J. Mei, K. Jiang, J. Li, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia-Fernandez, H. Sun, X. Huang, et al., Nature Communications15, 9597 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    R.Jiang, J.Hou, Z.Fan, Z.-J.Lang, andW.Ku, Physical Review Letters 132, 126503 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Lu, Physical Review B109, 115114 (2024)

    Z.Ouyang, J.-M.Wang, J.-X.Wang, R.-Q.He, L.Huang, and Z.-Y. Lu, Physical Review B109, 115114 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Z. Liao, L. Chen, G. Duan, Y. Wang, C. Liu, R. Yu, and Q. Si, Physical Review B108, 214522 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    LaBollita, V

    H. LaBollita, V. Pardo, M. R.Norman, and A.S. Botana, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17279 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Shilenko and I

    D. Shilenko and I. Leonov, Physical Review B 108, 125105 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    L.-F. Lin, Y. Zhang, N. Kaushal, G. Alvarez, T. A. Maier, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Physical Review B 110, 195135 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Kakoi, T

    M. Kakoi, T. Kaneko, H. Sakakibara, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Physical Review B109, L201124 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Christiansson, F

    V. Christiansson, F. Petocchi, and P. Werner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 206501 (2023), URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.206501

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    J. Chen, F. Yang, and W. Li, Phys. Rev. B 110, L041111 (2024), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.110.L041111

    2024

  17. [25]

    Chen, Y.-H

    Y. Chen, Y.-H. Tian, J.-M. Wang, R.-Q. He, and Z.-Y. Lu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13737 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    X. Chen, P. Jiang, J. Li, Z. Zhong, and Y. Lu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.07154 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    LaBollita, V

    H. LaBollita, V. Pardo, M. R. Norman, and A. S. Botana, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, L111801 (2024), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevMaterials.8.L111801

    2024

  20. [28]

    Leonov, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15298 (2024)

    I. Leonov, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15298 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    C. Qin, K. Foyevtsova, L. Si, G. A. Sawatzky, and M. Jiang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15649 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. B 108, L180510 (2023), URL https://link.aps. 8 org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L180510

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    Z. Liu, H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Ma, Y. Ji, E. Yi, L. Li, H. Liu, J. Yu, Z. Zhang, et al., Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 66, 217411 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    K. Chen, X. Liu, J. Jiao, M. Zou, C. Jiang, X. Li, Y. Luo, Q. Wu, N. Zhang, Y. Guo, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 256503 (2024), URLhttps://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.256503

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    X. Ren, R. Sutarto, X. Wu, J. Zhang, H. Huang, T. Xi- ang, J. Hu, R. Comin, X. Zhou, and Z. Zhu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04121 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    T. Xie, M. Huo, X. Ni, F. Shen, X. Huang, H. Sun, H. C. Walker, D. Adroja, D. Yu, B. Shen, et al., Science Bul- letin 69, 3221 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Z. Liu, Y. Sakai, J. Yang, W. Li, Y. Liu, X. Ye, S. Qin, J. Chen, S. Agrestini, K. Chen, et al., Journal of the American Chemical Society142, 5731 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    I.Leonov, L.Pourovskii, A.Georges, andI.A.Abrikosov, Phys. Rev. B 94, 155135 (2016), URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155135

    2016 doi

  29. [37]

    Takano, S

    M. Takano, S. Nasu, T. Abe, K. Yamamoto, S. Endo, Y. Takeda, and J. B. Goodenough, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3267 (1991), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.67.3267

    1991

  30. [38]

    Pardo and W

    V. Pardo and W. E. Pickett, Phys. Rev. B 85, 045111 (2012), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.85.045111

    2012

  31. [39]

    Takegami, A

    D. Takegami, A. Tanaka, S. Agrestini, Z. Hu, J. Weinen, M. Rotter, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, T. Willers, T. C. Koethe, T. Lorenz, et al., Phys. Rev. X 13, 011037 (2023), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevX.13.011037

    2023

  32. [40]

    L. Wang, Y. Li, S.-Y. Xie, F. Liu, H. Sun, C. Huang, Y. Gao, T. Nakagawa, B. Fu, B. Dong, et al., Journal of the American Chemical Society146, 7506 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Glatzel and U

    P. Glatzel and U. Bergmann, Coordination chemistry re- views 249, 65 (2005)

    2005

  34. [42]

    Bergmann, C

    U. Bergmann, C. Horne, T. Collins, J. Workman, and S. Cramer, Chemical physics letters302, 119 (1999)

    1999

  35. [43]

    Fazinić, L

    S. Fazinić, L. Mandić, M. Kavčič, and I. Božičević, Spec- trochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 66, 461 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    Gallo and P

    E. Gallo and P. Glatzel, Advanced Materials26, 7730 (2014)

    2014

  37. [45]

    Abbate, G

    M. Abbate, G. Zampieri, F. Prado, A. Caneiro, J. M. Gonzalez-Calbet, and M. Vallet-Regi, Phys. Rev. B 65, 155101 (2002), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.155101

    2002 doi

  38. [46]

    Chen and A

    H. Chen and A. Millis, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 29, 243001 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    Takegami, K

    D. Takegami, K. Fujinuma, R. Nakamura, M. Yoshimura, K.-D. Tsuei, G. Wang, N. N. Wang, J.-G. Cheng, Y. Uwatoko, and T. Mizokawa, Phys. Rev. B 109, 125119 (2024), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.109.125119

    2024

  40. [48]

    Harder, C

    M. Harder, C. J. Sahle, C. Weis, et al., Physical Review X 9, 011025 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Spiekermann, C

    G. Spiekermann, C. J. Sahle, J. Niskanen, K. Gilmore, S. Petitgirard, C. Sternemann, J. S. Tse, and M. Mu- rakami, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters14, 1848 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Albers, R

    C. Albers, R. Sakrowski, N. Thiering, L. Libon, G. Spiek- ermann, J. M. Kaa, H. Gretarsson, M. Sundermann, M. Tolan, M. Wilke, et al., Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 38, 1097 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    J. Li, P. Ma, H. Zhang, X. Huang, C. Huang, M. Huo, D. Hu, Z. Dong, C. He, J. Liao, et al.,Pressure-driven right-triangle shape superconductivity in bilayer nickelate la3ni2o7 (2024), 2404.11369, URL https://arxiv.org/ abs/2404.11369

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Potapkin, L

    V. Potapkin, L. Dubrovinsky, I. Sergueev, M. Ekholm, I. Kantor, D. Bessas, E. Bykova, V. Prakapenka, R. P. Hermann, R. Rüffer, et al., Phys. Rev. B 93, 201110 (2016), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.93.201110

    2016

  45. [53]

    Bunău and Y

    O. Bunău and Y. Joly, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 21, 345501 (2009)

    2009

  46. [54]

    Joly, Phys

    Y. Joly, Phys. Rev. B63, 125120 (2001), URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.125120

    2001 doi

  47. [55]

    Y. Joly, O. Bunău, J.-E. Lorenzo, R.-M. Galera, S. Gre- nier, and B. Thompson, inJournal of Physics: Confer- ence Series (IOP Publishing, 2009), vol. 190, p. 012007

    2009

  48. [56]

    De Groot, G

    F. De Groot, G. Vankó, and P. Glatzel, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter21, 104207 (2009)

    2009

  49. [57]

    K. Chen, F. Baudelet, Y. Mijiti, L. Nataf, A. Di Cicco, Z. Hu, S. Agrestini, A. Komarek, M. Sougrati, J. Haines, et al., The Journal of Physical Chemistry C123, 21114 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Mijit, K

    E. Mijit, K. Chen, J. E. F. Rodrigues, Z. Hu, L. Nataf, A. Trapananti, A. Di Cicco, and F. Baudelet, Physical Review B 103, 024105 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Medarde, A

    M. Medarde, A. Fontaine, J. L. García-Muñoz, J. Rodríguez-Carvajal, M. de Santis, M. Sacchi, G. Rossi, and P. Lacorre, Phys. Rev. B 46, 14975 (1992), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 46.14975

    1992 doi

  52. [60]

    Acosta-Alejandro, J

    M. Acosta-Alejandro, J. M. de León, M. Medarde, P. La- corre, K. Konder, and P. A. Montano, Phys. Rev. B 77, 085107 (2008), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.085107

    2008 doi

  53. [61]

    A. Y. Ramos, C. Piamonteze, H. C. N. Tolentino, N. M. Souza-Neto, O. Bunau, Y. Joly, S. Grenier, J.- P. Itié, N. E. Massa, J. A. Alonso, et al., Phys. Rev. B 85, 045102 (2012), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.045102

    2012 doi

  54. [62]

    Nemes, et al., Chemistry of Materials36, 596 (2023)

    J.E.Rodrigues, A.D.Rosa, J.Gainza, R.S.Silva, E.Mi- jit, G.Garbarino, T.Irifune, T.Shinmei, C.Dejoie, N.M. Nemes, et al., Chemistry of Materials36, 596 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    J. B. Torrance, P. Lacorre, A. I. Nazzal, E. J. Ansaldo, and C. Niedermayer, Phys. Rev. B 45, 8209 (1992), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.45.8209

    1992

  56. [64]

    M. Li, Y. Wang, C. Pei, M. Zhang, N. Li, J. Guan, M. Amboage, N.-D. Adama, Q. Kong, Y. Qi, et al., Distinguishing electronic band structure of single-layer and bilayer ruddlesden-popper nickelates probed by in- situ high pressure x-ray absorption near-edge spec- troscopy (2024...

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    N. Wang, G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Hou, J. Luo, X. Ma, H. Yang, L. Shi, J. Dou, J. Feng, et al., Nature pp. 1–6 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Garbarino, M

    G. Garbarino, M. E. Hanfland, S. Gallego-Parra, A. D. Rosa, M. Mezouar, D. Duran, K. Martel, E. Papillon, T. Roth, P. Got, et al., High Pressure Research pp. 1–18 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Mathon, A

    O. Mathon, A. Beteva, J. Borrel, D. Bugnazet, S. Gatla, R. Hino, I. Kantor, T. Mairs, M. Munoz, S. Pasternak, 9 et al., Journal of synchrotron radiation22, 1548 (2015)

    2015

  60. [68]

    A. Rosa, G. Garbarino, J. Rodrigues, E. Mijit, J. Ja- cobs, D. Bugnazet, S. Pasternak, G. Berruyer, A. Moyne, C. Clavel, et al., High Pressure Research pp. 1–29 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    C. J. Sahle, S. Petitgirard, G. Spiekermann, R. Sakrowski, N. Suomalainen, F. Gerbon, J. Ja- cobs, Y. Watier, C. Sternemann, M. Moretti Sala, et al., High Pressure Research pp. 1–24 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    Moretti Sala, K

    M. Moretti Sala, K. Martel, C. Henriquet, A. Al Zein, L. Simonelli, C. Sahle, H. Gonzalez, M.-C. Lagier, C. Ponchut, S. Huotari, et al., Journal of synchrotron radiation 25, 580 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    C. J. Sahle, F. Gerbon, C. Henriquet, R. Verbeni, B. Detlefs, A. Longo, A. Mirone, M.-C. Lagier, F. Otte, G. Spiekermann, et al., Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 30, 251 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    Irifune, A

    T. Irifune, A. Kurio, S. Sakamoto, T. Inoue, and H. Sumiya, Nature421, 599 (2003)

    2003

  65. [73]

    Ishimatsu, K

    N. Ishimatsu, K. Matsumoto, H. Maruyama, N. Kawa- mura, M. Mizumaki, H. Sumiya, and T. Irifune, Journal of synchrotron radiation19, 768 (2012). Supplementary Information Local electronic properties of La3Ni2O7 under pressure Figure S1: Powder X-ray diffraction measurements at ...

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.