Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Quantum impurities in finite-temperature Bose gases: Detecting vortex proliferation across the BKT and BEC transitions

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A repulsive impurity's injection spectrum develops a redshifted branch that tracks vortex proliferation across the BKT and BEC transitions, offering a local spectroscopic probe of these phase transitions.

desk verdict Careful SPGPE-plus-Schrödinger numerics give a real temperature-dependent attractive branch in impurity spectra, but the vortex-specific reading and the BKT-estimation claim outrun what the calculation actually shows. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08546 v3 pith:EDF4EBY3 submitted 2024-12-11 cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.mes-hall

Paolo Comaron , Nathan Goldman , Atac Imamoglu , Ivan Amelio This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.mes-hall
keywords BosepolaroninjectionspectroscopyBerezinskii-Kosterlitz-ThoulesstransitionvortexproliferationstochasticGross-Pitaevskiiequationclassical-fieldmethodsexcitonicinsulatorBose-Einsteincondensation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a single repulsive impurity injected into a weakly interacting Bose gas at finite temperature can act as a local spectroscopic detector of vortex proliferation. In two dimensions, the injection spectrum develops a low-energy attractive branch whose weight grows as the temperature crosses the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition, with a minimum around $T_{\rm BKT}$; the branch is attributed to the impurity binding to vortices and density holes, where the reduced boson density lowers the repulsive Hartree energy. In three dimensions, an attractive branch appears once vortex rings nucleate well below the BEC temperature and disappears above it, leaving a single Lorentzian from the uniform thermal gas. The authors propose this mechanism as a spectroscopic estimator of the BKT transition in excitonic insulators and as a route to understanding finite-temperature Bose polaron spectra.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the stochastic projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation (SPGPE) for the Bose bath, coupled to a full Schrödinger equation for the impurity moving in the stochastic potential $g_{BI} n_B(\mathbf{x},t)$. The SPGPE describes the highly occupied modes of the gas up to an energy cutoff $\epsilon_{\rm cut} = \mu + T \log 2$, with a projected white noise enforcing thermal fluctuations. For each stochastic realization, the impurity wavefunction is evolved from a uniform initial state, and the injection spectrum is obtained from the Fourier transform of the averaged overlap function. The physical mechanism is that the impurity is repelled from high-density regions and can become quasi-bound in the density-depleted core of a vortex; the binding energies are computed by exact diagonalization in the Padé-approximated vortex density profile, and they match the observed spectral sidebands.

What would settle it

Measure the injection spectrum of a repulsive impurity in a uniform 2D Bose gas while independently imaging the vortex distribution (e.g., by matter-wave interference or stirring); if the low-energy sideband does not appear at the temperature where vortices proliferate, or if its peak position disagrees with the bound-state energy computed from the measured vortex density profile by more than the linewidth, the vortex-binding mechanism is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors show that the injection spectrum of a zero-momentum impurity repulsively coupled to a weakly interacting Bose gas carries direct, local signatures of vortex proliferation. At low temperature the spectrum is a delta-like peak at the Hartree shift $g_{BI} n_0$. As temperature rises and vortices (or vortex rings in 3D) appear, the impurity can bind in the density-depleted core of a vortex, producing a red-shifted spectral branch whose minimum lies at the BKT transition in 2D and at the threshold of vortex-ring nucleation in 3D. Above the BEC transition in 3D the condensate is gone, vortices vanish, and the spectrum collapses to a single Lorentzian. The energies of the observed attractive lines match the s-wave bound states of the impurity in an isolated vortex computed from the Padé-approximated Pitaevskii profile.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the stochastic classical-field description of the Bose gas, together with the neglect of the impurity's back-action on the bath, faithfully reproduces the density holes and vortex configurations that the impurity binds to; if those fluctuations are captured incorrectly, or if back-action becomes significant at the interaction strengths used, the predicted attractive sideband would shift or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A repulsive impurity can serve as a local spectroscopic probe of vortex proliferation, providing an estimate of the BKT transition temperature in 2D without imaging phase winding or measuring superfluid density.
  • The same mechanism could be used to detect superfluidity and vortices in excitonic insulators in transition-metal dichalcogenide heterostructures.
  • In 3D, the impurity spectrum distinguishes the vortex-ring regime below $T_{\rm BEC}$ from the normal-gas regime above it, potentially allowing a local thermometer for the condensation transition.
  • The mass dependence of the attractive sidebands (one vs two lines) reflects the number of vortex-bound states, making the spectroscopy sensitive to the vortex density profile.
  • Finite-temperature Bose polaron injection spectra generically feature a split repulsive branch and an attractive branch whenever vortices or density holes are present.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this mechanism is confirmed, injection spectroscopy could be used as a non-destructive, local sensor of topological order, complementing global probes such as the superfluid density jump.
  • A natural testable extension is to measure the spatial map of the attractive-branch weight in a trapped gas and check that it tracks the local vortex density.
  • One could apply the same stochastic approach to systems where vortices proliferate out of equilibrium (driven-dissipative polariton condensates or quenched gases), extending the detection scheme beyond equilibrium transitions.
  • The neglect of impurity back-action sets a practical limit: at higher impurity densities or stronger repulsion, self-localization or bath deformation would renormalize the binding energy, and the simple single-impurity picture would need correction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper uses the stochastic projected Gross-Pitaevskii equation (SPGPE) for the weakly interacting Bose bath and a full Schrödinger evolution for the impurity to compute the zero-momentum injection spectrum of a repulsively coupled impurity at finite temperature. In 2D, the authors find a low-energy attractive branch whose weight grows near the BKT transition and whose minimum lies close to T_BKT; they attribute this branch to impurity binding to vortices and density holes. In 3D, they report an attractive branch associated with vortex rings below the BEC transition and a single Lorentzian above it. The numerical setup includes density fixing via the chemical potential, finite-size checks, and a comparison of the attractive branch with bound-state energies in an isolated static vortex.

Significance. If the vortex-specific interpretation is established, the paper would provide a concrete local spectroscopic route to detecting vortex proliferation in neutral superfluids, with potential relevance to excitonic insulators and to finite-temperature Bose polaron physics. The numerical work is carefully designed: the bath is equilibrated within SPGPE, the density is fixed, finite-size convergence of local observables and of the spectra is reported, and the bound-state comparison uses an independent static vortex profile (Pitaevskii-Berloff). No parameter is fitted to the target spectral data. The main weakness is that the central attribution of the attractive branch to vortices, as opposed to generic density holes, is not directly demonstrated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Model and methods, Eq. (4); Numerical results in 2D; Figs. S4-S5] The impurity Schrödinger equation (4) depends on the bosonic density n_B(x,t)=|psi|^2+n_inc and not on the phase of the classical field psi. Consequently, a vortex affects the impurity only through the density depletion at its core, and any low-density region produces the same kind of attractive potential. The paper itself states that 'not all density holes correspond to vortices', and Figs. S4-S5 show density deeps without any phase winding. The attractive branch is therefore equally consistent with a generic density-hole or Lifshitz-tail mechanism. To support the central claim that spectroscopy detects vortex proliferation, the authors should provide a diagnostic that isolates the vortex contribution, for example by conditioning the spectrum on the impurity being initialized at detected vortex cores, or by recomputing the spectrum after removing phase windings while preserving the density field. Without such a test, the vortex-specific interpretation is underdetermined.
  2. [Numerical results in 2D, Fig. 1(b); Eq. (5)] The presence and location of the minimum of the attractive branch near T_inf_BKT depend in part on the incoherent density n_inc=(mT/2pi)log2, whose numerical value is set by the cutoff epsilon_cut=mu+T log2. The authors note that the blueshift above T_BKT is 'in part due to the increase of the incoherent fraction', which is a uniform contribution. A different, equally conventional choice of cutoff would change n_inc and therefore shift the position and strength of the apparent minimum. The quantitative claim that the spectra can be used to estimate T_BKT is thus cutoff-dependent unless the authors demonstrate robustness by varying epsilon_cut or by subtracting the uniform n_inc contribution before extracting the minimum.
  3. [Numerical results in 2D, Fig. 1(b); Supplemental Fig. S6(b)] For the L=20 micron box used in the main text, the algebraic correlation exponent alpha reaches the BKT critical value 0.25 at T approx 1.25 T_inf_BKT, which the authors attribute to the known finite-size shift of the BKT transition. However, the attractive-branch minimum is reported near T_inf_BKT, not near the finite-size crossover visible in the same simulations. This discrepancy needs an explicit explanation. If the minimum tracks the thermodynamic T_BKT while the actual finite-size vortex proliferation occurs at higher temperature, the vortex-binding mechanism becomes harder to reconcile with the observed minimum; if instead the minimum is controlled by generic density fluctuations, that also weakens the central claim.
  4. [Numerical results in 3D, Fig. 3(b)] The same density-only coupling issue applies to the 3D vortex-ring interpretation. The vortex-ring density in Fig. 3(a) grows below TBEC, but thermal density fluctuations also grow in the same temperature range, and the impurity potential (4) does not distinguish a ring core from any other low-density tubular region. The observation that the spectrum becomes a single Lorentzian above TBEC is expected for any nearly homogeneous thermal gas and does not by itself prove that the sub-TBEC attractive branch is caused by vortex rings. A control calculation that removes or masks the phase information, or a correlation analysis between the spectrum and ring-core locations, is needed before the 3D claim can be considered established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Model and methods, Eq. (1)] There is a typo: 'irrelavant' should be 'irrelevant'.
  2. [Model and methods, after Eq. (5)] The phrase 'above the cutoff blueepsilon_cut' contains an apparent editing artifact ('blue'); it should simply read 'above the cutoff epsilon_cut'.
  3. [Model and methods] The number of stochastic realizations Mstat is not specified in the main text, and the spectral plots do not show statistical error estimates; this information should be provided or referenced to the Supplemental Material.
  4. [References] Reference [68] is given as a placeholder string rather than a complete citation; the actual Supplemental Material URL should be supplied.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the impurity spectra are computed from stochastic bath dynamics and compared with independent vortex bound-state energies; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The impurity spectrum is obtained by solving Eq. (4) with the stochastic bath density n_B = |psi|^2 + n_inc generated by SPGPE simulations, and neither the spectrum nor its branch positions enter as inputs to any fit. The chemical potential is adjusted only to enforce the global density constraint <n_B> = n0, not to reproduce spectral lines. The comparison energies marked by green arrows are computed independently from the zero-temperature Pitaevskii vortex profile via the Berloff Pade approximation, and the BKT temperature used for the temperature axis is the standard Prokof'ev-Svistunov expression. The authors explicitly note that not all density holes correspond to vortices and that the blueshift above T_BKT partly reflects the growing incoherent fraction, showing that the vortex assignment is an interpretation rather than a fitted identity. Any concern that the impurity only couples to density, and that the attractive branch is a generic density-hole or Lifshitz-tail effect, is a question of physical interpretation and quantitative robustness, not circularity: no equation reduces the predicted spectrum to an input parameter, and no self-citation is load-bearing. Thus the paper merits a circularity score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the classical-field SPGPE approximation and the neglect of impurity back-action. The only hand-chosen numerical parameters are gamma, gBI, and the box size, none of which are fitted to the spectral output. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • dissipation rate gamma = 0.05
    Coupling to the thermal reservoir in the SPGPE; results are weakly dependent on it (see 'Physical parameters' in SI).
  • impurity-boson coupling gBI = 2 gBB
    Interaction strength chosen for the simulations; experimentally tunable via Feshbach resonance, so it is an input rather than a fitted parameter.
  • simulation box size L = 20 um (with convergence checks at 50 and 100 um)
    Finite box used for the main results; the paper demonstrates convergence of local observables and spectra with box size in SI Sec. S4 and S6.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The SPGPE (Eq. 3) accurately describes the finite-temperature weakly-interacting Bose gas, including its density fluctuations and vortex dynamics.
    Justified by references [44-48, 57-59]; the entire spectral calculation depends on this classical-field approximation being valid.
  • domain assumption The impurity feedback on the Bose gas (the term gBI|Psi|^2 psi in Eq. 3) can be neglected for a single delocalized impurity.
    Stated after Eq. (4), justified by 1/V normalization; the authors note it breaks down for gBI ~ N gBB and for attractive interactions where two-body bound states matter.
  • standard math The BKT transition temperature for the simulated 2D gas is given by T_BKT = 2 pi n0 / (m log(C/m gBB)) with C=380.
    Used to label the temperature axis and to identify the transition region; taken from Ref. [66], an externally established result.
  • domain assumption Berloff's Pade approximant for the vortex density profile accurately represents the T=0 vortex state for computing impurity bound states.
    Used in SI Sec. S3 to compute the bound-state energies shown as green arrows; the approximation is cited to Ref. [82].
  • domain assumption The vortex detection algorithm based on phase winding around closed grid paths reliably identifies vortices and vortex rings.
    Implemented with the VortexDistributions.jl library [69,70]; the analysis of vortex densities and rings depends on this numerical detection being accurate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum impurities in finite-temperature Bose gases: Detecting vortex proliferation across the BKT and BEC transitions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EDF4EBY3

@misc{pith2026241208546,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum impurities in finite-temperature Bose gases: Detecting vortex proliferation across the BKT and BEC transitions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EDF4EBY3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08546}
}
read the original abstract

Detecting vortices in neutral superfluids represents an outstanding experimental challenge. Using stochastic classical-field methods, we theoretically show that a quantum impurity repulsively coupled to a weakly-interacting Bose gas at finite temperature carries direct spectroscopic signatures of vortex proliferation. In two dimensions, we find that a low-energy (attractive) branch in the excitation spectrum becomes prominent when the temperature is tuned across the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition. We explain this red-shifted resonance as originating from the binding of the impurity to vortices, where the bosons density (and hence, the repulsive Hartree energy) is reduced. This mechanism could be exploited to spectroscopically estimate the BKT transition in excitonic insulators. In contrast, in three dimensions, the impurity spectra reflect the presence of vortex rings well below the condensation temperature, and herald the presence of a thermal gas above the Bose-Einstein condensation transition. Importantly, we expect our results to have impact on the understanding of Bose-polaron formation at finite temperatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08546 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Counterflow of lattice polarons in harmonically confined optical lattices

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a trapped 1D lattice, a single repulsive impurity in a Mott-insulator bath forms a correlated counterflow state with a combined unity-filling profile and slowly decaying anti-pair correlations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S. P. Rath and R. Schmidt, Field-theoretical study of the bose polaron, Phys. Rev. A88, 053632 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    Massignan, M

    P. Massignan, M. Zaccanti, and G. M. Bruun, Polarons, dressed molecules and itinerant ferromagnetism in ultra- cold Fermi gases, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 034401 (2014)

    2014

  3. [3]

    Scazza, M

    F. Scazza, M. Zaccanti, P. Massignan, M. M. Parish, and J. Levinsen, Repulsive Fermi and Bose Polarons in Quan- tum Gases, Atoms10, 10.3390/atoms10020055 (2022)

    doi:10.3390/atoms10020055 2022

  4. [4]

    M. M. Parish and J. Levinsen, Fermi polarons and be- yond (2023), arXiv:2306.01215 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Grusdt, N

    F. Grusdt, N. Mostaan, E. Demler, and L. A. P. Ardila, Impurities and polarons in bosonic quantum gases: a re- view on recent progress (2024), arXiv:2410.09413 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    L. D. Landau and S. I. Pekar, Effective mass of a polaron, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.18, 419 (1948)

    work page 1948

  7. [7]

    Chevy, Universal phase diagram of a strongly interact- ing Fermi gas with unbalanced spin populations, Phys

    F. Chevy, Universal phase diagram of a strongly interact- ing Fermi gas with unbalanced spin populations, Phys. Rev. A 74, 063628 (2006)

    2006

  8. [8]

    Mediated interactions between Fermi polarons and the role of impurity quantum statistics

    C. Baroni, B. Huang, I. Fritsche, E. Dobler, G. Anich, E. Kirilov, R. Grimm, M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, P. Massignan, and G. Bruun, Mediated interactions be- tween Fermi polarons and the role of impurity quantum statistics (2023), arXiv:2305.04915 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    Levinsen, M

    J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, R. S. Christensen, J. J. Arlt, and G. M. Bruun, Finite-temperature behavior of the Bose polaron, Phys. Rev. A96, 063622 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Pastukhov, Polaron in the dilute critical Bose conden- sate,JournalofPhysicsA:MathematicalandTheoretical 51, 195003 (2018)

    V. Pastukhov, Polaron in the dilute critical Bose conden- sate,JournalofPhysicsA:MathematicalandTheoretical 51, 195003 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Boudjemâa, Self-consistent theory of a Bose-Einstein condensate with impurity at finite temperature, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical48, 045002 (2014)

    A. Boudjemâa, Self-consistent theory of a Bose-Einstein condensate with impurity at finite temperature, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical48, 045002 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    Guenther, P

    N.-E. Guenther, P. Massignan, M. Lewenstein, and G. M. Bruun, Bose polarons at finite temperature and strong coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 050405 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Field, J

    B. Field, J. Levinsen, and M. M. Parish, Fate of the Bose polaron at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. A101, 013623 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Dzsotjan, R

    D. Dzsotjan, R. Schmidt, and M. Fleischhauer, Dynam- ical variational approach to Bose polarons at finite tem- peratures, Physical Review Letters124, 223401 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Drescher, M

    M. Drescher, M. Salmhofer, and T. Enss, Bosonic func- tional determinant approach and its application to po- laron spectra (2024), arXiv:2403.13582 [cond-mat.quant- gas]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Pascual and J

    G. Pascual and J. Boronat, Quasiparticle nature of the Bose polaron at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 205301 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    M.-G. Hu, M. J. Van de Graaff, D. Kedar, J. P. Corson, E.A.Cornell,andD.S.Jin,Bosepolaronsinthestrongly interacting regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 055301 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    N. B. Jørgensen, L. Wacker, K. T. Skalmstang, M. M. Parish, J. Levinsen, R. S. Christensen, G. M. Bruun, and J. J. Arlt, Observation of Attractive and Repulsive Polarons in a Bose-Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 055302 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Z. Z. Yan, Y. Ni, C. Robens, and M. W. Zwierlein, Bose polarons near quantum criticality, Science368, 190 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Sidler, P

    M. Sidler, P. Back, O. Cotlet, A. Srivastava, T. Fink, M. Kroner, E. Demler, and A. Imamoglu, Fermi polaron- polaritons in charge-tunable atomically thin semiconduc- tors, Nat. Phys.13, 255 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Courtade, M

    E. Courtade, M. Semina, M. Manca, M. M. Glazov, C. Robert, F. Cadiz, G. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, M. Pierre, W. Escoffier, E. L. Ivchenko, P. Renucci, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Charged excitons in monolayer WSe2: Experiment and theory, Phys. Rev. B 96, 0853...

    2017

  14. [22]

    E. C. Regan, D. Wang, C. Jin, M. I. B. Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, S. Zhao, W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, K. Yumigeta, M. Blei, J. D. Carlström, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S.Tongay, M.Crommie, A.Zettl,andF.Wang,Mottand generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe2/WS2 moiré superlattices, Nature ...

    2020

  15. [23]

    Y. Xu, S. Liu, D. A. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, V. Elser, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Correlated in- sulating states at fractional fillings of moiré superlattices, Nature 587, 214 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Smoleński, P

    T. Smoleński, P. E. Dolgirev, C. Kuhlenkamp, A. Popert, Y. Shimazaki, P. Back, X. Lu, M. Kroner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. Esterlis, E. Demler, and A. Imamoğlu, Signatures of Wigner crystal of electrons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nature 595, 53 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Y. Zhou, J. Sung, E. Brutschea, I. Esterlis, Y. Wang, G. Scuri, R. J. Gelly, H. Heo, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, G. Zaránd, M. D. Lukin, P. Kim, E. Demler, and H. Park, Bilayer Wigner crystals in a transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructure, Nature595, 48 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    H. Li, S. Li, E. C. Regan, D. Wang, W. Zhao, S. Kahn, K. Yumigeta, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, M. F. Crommie, and F. Wang, Imag- ing two-dimensional generalized Wigner crystals, Nature 597, 650 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Shimazaki, C

    Y. Shimazaki, C. Kuhlenkamp, I. Schwartz, T. Smoleński, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kroner, R. Schmidt, M. Knap, and A. m. c. Imamoğlu, Optical signatures of periodic charge distribution in a Mott-like correlated insulator state, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021027 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Kiper, H

    N. Kiper, H. S. Adlong, A. Christianen, M. Kroner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. Imamoglu, Confined trions and Mott-Wigner states in a purely electrostatic moiré potential (2024), arXiv:2407.20905 [cond-mat.str- el]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Amelio and N

    I. Amelio and N. Goldman, Polaron spectroscopy of in- teracting Fermi systems: Insights from exact diagonal- ization, SciPost Phys.16, 056 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Shimazaki, I

    Y. Shimazaki, I. Schwartz, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Kroner, and A. Imamoğlu, Strongly correlated elec- trons and hybrid excitons in a moiré heterostructure, Na- ture 580, 472 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    V. E. Colussi, F. Caleffi, C. Menotti, and A. Recati, Lat- tice polarons across the superfluid to Mott insulator tran- sition, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 173002 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Santiago-García, S

    M. Santiago-García, S. G. Castillo-López, and A. Camacho-Guardian, Lattice polaron in a Bose- 7 Einstein condensate of hard-core bosons (2024), arXiv:2403.13635 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Amelio, G.Mazza, andN

    I. Amelio, G.Mazza, andN. Goldman,Polaronformation in insulators and the key role of hole scattering processes in band insulators, charge density waves, and Mott tran- sitions, Phys. Rev. B110, 235302 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Alhyder, V

    R. Alhyder, V. E. Colussi, M. Cufar, J. Brand, A. Recati, and G. M. Bruun, Lattice Bose polarons at strong cou- pling and quantum criticality (2024), arXiv:2412.07597 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Amelio, N

    I. Amelio, N. D. Drummond, E. Demler, R. Schmidt, and A. Imamoglu, Polaron spectroscopy of a bilayer excitonic insulator, Phys. Rev. B107, 155303 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Amelio, Two-dimensional polaron spectroscopy of Fermi superfluids, Phys

    I. Amelio, Two-dimensional polaron spectroscopy of Fermi superfluids, Phys. Rev. B107, 104519 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    R. Qi, Q. Li, Z. Zhang, S. Chen, J. Xie, Y. Ou, Z. Cui, D. D. Dai, A. Y. Joe, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, L. Fu, and F. Wang, Electrically controlled interlayer trion fluid in electron-hole bilayers (2023), arXiv:2312.03251 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    L. Ma, P. X. Nguyen, Z. Wang, Y. Zeng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Strongly correlated excitonic insulator in atomic double layers, Nature 598, 585 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    J. Gu, L. Ma, S. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, J.Shan,andK.F.Mak,Dipolarexcitonicinsulator in a moiré lattice, Nature Physics18, 395 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    B. Sun, W. Zhao, T. Palomaki, Z. Fei, E. Runburg, P. Malinowski, X. Huang, J. Cenker, Y.-T. Cui, J.-H. Chu, X. Xu, S. S. Ataei, D. Varsano, M. Palummo, E. Molinari, M. Rontani, and D. H. Cobden, Evidence for equilibrium exciton condensation in monolayer WTe2, Nature Physics 18...

    2021

  33. [41]

    R. Qi, A. Y. Joe, Z. Zhang, J. Xie, Q. Feng, Z. Lu, Z. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, and F. Wang, Perfect Coulomb drag and exciton transport in an excitonic insulator (2023), arXiv:2309.15357 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    P. X. Nguyen, R. Chaturvedi, L. Ma, P. Knuppel, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, A degenerate trion liquid in atomic double layers (2023), arXiv:2312.12571 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metasta- bility and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics6, 1181 (1973)

    1973

  36. [44]

    H. T. C. Stoof, Coherent versus incoherent dynamics dur- ing Bose-Einstein condensation in atomic gases, Journal of Low Temperature Physics114, 11 (1999)

    1999

  37. [45]

    C. W. Gardiner, J. R. Anglin, and T. I. A. Fudge, The stochastic Gross-Pitaevskii equation, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 35, 1555 (2002)

    2002

  38. [46]

    C. W. Gardiner and M. J. Davis, The stochastic Gross- Pitaevskii equation: II, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics36, 4731 (2003)

    2003

  39. [47]

    Blakie, A

    P. Blakie, A. Bradley, M. Davis, R. Ballagh, and C. Gar- diner, Dynamics and statistical mechanics of ultra-cold Bose gases using c-field techniques, Advances in Physics 57, 363 (2008)

    2008

  40. [48]

    A. S. Bradley, C. W. Gardiner, and M. J. Davis, Bose- einstein condensation from a rotating thermal cloud: Vortex nucleation and lattice formation, Phys. Rev. A 77, 033616 (2008)

    2008

  41. [49]

    Vashisht, I

    A. Vashisht, I. Amelio, L. Vanderstraeten, G. M. Bruun, O. K. Diessel, and N. Goldman, Chiral polaron forma- tion on the edge of topological quantum matter (2024), arXiv:2407.19093 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    J. B. Curtis, N. Maksimovic, N. R. Poniatowski, A. Ya- coby, B. Halperin, P. Narang, andE. Demler, Probingthe Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless vortex unbinding transi- tionintwo-dimensionalsuperconductorsusinglocalnoise magnetometry, Physical Review B 110, 10.1103/phys- revb.11...

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    G. P. Bewley, D. P. Lathrop, and K. R. Sreenivasan, Vi- sualization of quantized vortices, Nature441, 588 (2006)

    2006

  44. [52]

    G. P. Bewley, M. S. Paoletti, K. R. Sreenivasan, and D. P. Lathrop, Characterization of reconnecting vortices in su- perfluid helium, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 13707 (2008)

    2008

  45. [53]

    M. Knap, A. Shashi, Y. Nishida, A. Imambekov, D. A. Abanin, and E. Demler, Time-dependent impurity in ul- tracold fermions: Orthogonality catastrophe and beyond, Phys. Rev. X2, 041020 (2012)

    2012

  46. [54]

    M. J. Davis, S. A. Morgan, and K. Burnett, Simulations of Bose fields at finite temperature, Physical Review Let- ters 87, 10.1103/physrevlett.87.160402 (2001)

    2001 doi

  47. [55]

    N.P.ProukakisandB.Jackson,Finite-temperaturemod- els of Bose-Einstein condensation, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 41, 203002 (2008)

    2008

  48. [56]

    S. P. Cockburn and N. P. Proukakis, The stochastic Gross-Pitaevskii equation and some applications, Laser Physics 19, 558 (2009)

    2009

  49. [57]

    I.-K. Liu, S. Donadello, G. Lamporesi, G. Ferrari, S.- C. Gou, F. Dalfovo, and N. P. Proukakis, Dynami- cal equilibration across a quenched phase transition in a trapped quantum gas, Communications Physics 1, 10.1038/s42005-018-0023-6 (2018)

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    Comaron, F

    P. Comaron, F. Larcher, F. Dalfovo, and N. P. Proukakis, Quench dynamics of an ultracold two-dimensional Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A100, 033618 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    A. J. Groszek, P. Comaron, N. P. Proukakis, and T. P. Billam, Crossover in the dynamical critical exponent of a quenched two-dimensional Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013212 (2021)

    2021

  52. [60]

    S. J. Rooney, T. W. Neely, B. P. Anderson, and A. S. Bradley, Persistent-current formation in a high- temperature Bose-Einstein condensate: An experimental test for classical-field theory, Phys. Rev. A88, 063620 (2013)

    2013

  53. [61]

    F. M. Cucchietti and E. Timmermans, Strong-Coupling Polarons in Dilute Gas Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 210401 (2006)

    2006

  54. [62]

    In particular, at T = 0, one would obtain a mean- field shifted attractive line, and no repulsive branch. See Ref. [68]

  55. [63]

    Drescher, M

    M. Drescher, M. Salmhofer, and T. Enss, Theory of a resonantly interacting impurity in a Bose-Einstein con- densate, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 032011 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    Guenther, R

    N.-E. Guenther, R. Schmidt, G. M. Bruun, V. Gu- rarie, and P. Massignan, Mobile impurity in a Bose- Einstein condensate and the orthogonality catastrophe, Phys. Rev. A103, 013317 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    Yegovtsev, G

    N. Yegovtsev, G. E. Astrakharchik, P. Massignan, and V. Gurarie, Exact results for heavy unitary Bose po- larons, Phys. Rev. A110, 023310 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Prokof’ev and B

    N. Prokof’ev and B. Svistunov, Two-dimensional weakly interacting Bose gas in the fluctuation region, Phys. Rev. 8 A 66, 043608 (2002)

    2002

  59. [67]

    Alhyder and G

    R. Alhyder and G. M. Bruun, Mobile impurity probing a two-dimensional superfluid phase transition, Phys. Rev. A 105, 063303 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Here Refs

    "See Supplementary Information at the url [...] for details of the simulations, spectral slices, analysis of the finite size effects, and the static and attractive cases. Here Refs. [75–82] are included. "

  61. [69]

    M. T. Reeves, T. P. Billam, B. P. Anderson, and A. S. Bradley, Signatures of coherent vortex structures in a dis- orderedtwo-dimensionalquantumfluid,Phys.Rev.A 89, 053631 (2014)

    2014

  62. [70]

    T. P. Billam, M. T. Reeves, B. P. Anderson, and A. S. Bradley, Onsager-Kraichnan condensation in decaying two-dimensional quantum turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 145301 (2014)

    2014

  63. [71]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose-Einstein Condensa- tion and Superfluidity(Oxford University Press, 2016)

    2016

  64. [72]

    Caputo, D

    D. Caputo, D. Ballarini, G. Dagvadorj, C. Sánchez Muñoz, M. De Giorgi, L. Dominici, K. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, G. Gigli, F. P. Laussy, M. H. Szymańska, and D. Sanvitto, Topological order and thermal equilibrium in polariton condensates, Nature Materials 17, 145 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    Comaron, I

    P. Comaron, I. Carusotto, M. H. Szymańska, and N. P. Proukakis, Non-equilibrium Berezinskii-Kosterlitz- Thouless transition in driven-dissipative condensates(a), Europhysics Letters 133, 17002 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Comaron, E

    P. Comaron, E. Estrecho, M. Wurdack, M. Pieczarka, M. Steger, D. Snoke, K. West, L. Pfeiffer, A. Truscott, M. Matuszewski, et al., Coherence of a non-equilibrium polariton condensate across the interaction-mediated phase transition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10506 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Chomaz, L

    L. Chomaz, L. Corman, T. Bienaimé, R. Desbuquois, C. Weitenberg, S. Nascimbène, J. Beugnon, and J. Dal- ibard, Emergence of coherence via transverse condensa- tion in a uniform quasi-two-dimensional Bose gas, Nature Communications 6, 10.1038/ncomms7162 (2015)

    2015 doi

  68. [76]

    J. L. Ville, R. Saint-Jalm, E. Le Cerf, M. Aidelsburger, S.Nascimbène, J.Dalibard,andJ.Beugnon,Soundprop- agation in a uniform superfluid two-dimensional Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 145301 (2018)

    2018

  69. [77]

    Saint-Jalm, P

    R. Saint-Jalm, P. C. M. Castilho, E. Le Cerf, B. Bakkali- Hassani, J.-L. Ville, S. Nascimbene, J. Beugnon, and J.Dalibard,Dynamicalsymmetryandbreathersinatwo- dimensional Bose gas, Phys. Rev. X9, 021035 (2019)

    2019

  70. [78]

    Buggle, J

    C. Buggle, J. Léonard, W. von Klitzing, and J. T. M. Walraven, Interferometric determination of thes and d- wave scattering amplitudes in87Rb, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 173202 (2004)

    2004

  71. [79]

    C. J. Foster, P. B. Blakie, and M. J. Davis, Vortex pairing in two-dimensional Bose gases, Phys. Rev. A81, 023623 (2010)

    2010

  72. [80]

    Gawryluk and M

    K. Gawryluk and M. Brewczyk, Signatures of a universal jump in the superfluid density of a two-dimensional Bose gas with a finite number of particles, Phys. Rev. A99, 033615 (2019)

    2019

  73. [81]

    Pitaevskii, Vortex lines in an imperfect Bose gas, Sov

    L. Pitaevskii, Vortex lines in an imperfect Bose gas, Sov. Phys. JETP 13, 451 (1961)

    1961

  74. [82]

    Quantum impurities in finite-temperature Bose gases: Detecting vortex proliferation across the BKT and BEC transitions

    N. G. Berloff, Padé approximations of solitary wave solu- tions of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General37, 1617 (2004). Supplemental Information for “Quantum impurities in finite-temperature Bose gases: Detecting vortex proliferation ac...

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.