Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 77 references

Chiral phase transition: effective field theory and holography

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs a Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory for two-flavor QCD near its chiral phase transition, shows its stochastic equations reduce to a non-Abelian model F, and confirms the action by a holographic AdS/QCD…

desk verdict Systematic SK EFT for the chiral condensate plus a holographic check, but the frozen energy-momentum assumption keeps it one step away from real QCD's universality class. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08882 v3 pith:5OFYP7ZR submitted 2024-12-12 hep-th cond-mat.mes-hallhep-phnucl-th

Yanyan Bu , Zexin Yang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.mes-hallhep-phnucl-th
keywords chiralphasetransitionSchwinger-KeldysheffectivefieldtheorymodelFHohenberg-HalperinclassificationAdS/QCDholographiccondensatestochasticdynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish a systematic low-energy description of the real-time dynamics of two-flavor QCD in the chiral limit near its (presumed second-order) chiral phase transition. It constructs a Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory whose dynamical variables are the left and right chiral charge densities and the chiral condensate, with fluctuation and dissipation built in through the Keldysh doubling. From this action it derives stochastic equations that, after dropping higher-order terms, reduce to a non-Abelian version of model F in the Hohenberg-Halperin classification. The paper then derives the same effective action from a holographic Schwinger-Keldysh computation in a modified AdS/QCD model, obtaining explicit numerical coefficients. If correct, the EFT gives a symmetry-controlled framework for studying critical slowing down, fluctuating hydrodynamics, and pionic Goldstone modes across the chiral transition.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Schwinger-Keldysh effective action $S_{\rm eff}$, written in the Keldysh basis with 'r' and 'a' fields, and built from the gauge-invariant combinations $B_\mu$ and $C_\mu$ (encoding the chiral charge fluctuations) together with the bi-fundamental order parameter $\Sigma$ (the chiral condensate). The action is organized by field number and spacetime derivatives and is fixed by the chemical shift symmetry and the dynamical KMS symmetry, which tie dissipative and noise terms together and enforce fluctuation-dissipation balance. On the holographic side, the machinery is the holographic Schwinger-Keldysh prescription applied to a modified AdS/QCD model, whose bulk scalar mass $m_0^2-\mu^2/r^2$ is tuned so that the dual operator sits at the chiral critical point. Solving the bulk equations in a double expansion in fields and derivatives, and renormalizing the on-shell action, yields the boundary EFT and its coefficients.

What would settle it

A concrete test would be to compute the dynamic critical exponent of the chiral transition of two-flavor QCD in the chiral limit from lattice QCD or the functional renormalization group and compare it with the model-F value implied by these stochastic equations; matching model H instead would show the frozen-energy assumption fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the low-energy, long-time behavior of the chiral transition is captured by a Schwinger-Keldysh effective action for the chiral charges and the chiral condensate, fully constrained by unitarity, the chemical shift symmetry, dynamical KMS symmetry, and Onsager relations. The paper shows that the resulting stochastic equations for the charge densities $\rho_L,\rho_R$ and the condensate $O_r$ coincide, at leading order, with a non-Abelian generalization of model F of the Hohenberg-Halperin classification. Independently, the paper evaluates the same effective action holographically: in a modified AdS/QCD model with the bulk scalar mass tuned to the critical point, the Schwinger-Keldysh prescription yields the same action, with coefficients such as $b_0=0.290(\mu_c-\mu)$, $b_1=-0.348-0.0100i$, $b_2=-0.121$, $b_3=-0.022-0.100i$, and $c_2=0.121$, $d_2=-0.121$. The holographic values obey all the symmetries imposed in the EFT construction, and below $T_c$ the equations produce a homogeneous condensate with the pion as the Goldstone phase mode.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that energy and momentum densities can be treated as frozen; the paper itself notes that if they were included, real-world QCD would fall into the model H universality class instead, so the entire construction depends on that neglect being valid near the chiral transition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The stochastic equations give a concrete starting point for numerical simulations of critical fluctuations and dissipation in the chiral transition.
  • Within the frozen-energy assumption, two-flavor QCD in the chiral limit belongs to the model-F universality class; including energy and momentum would shift it to model H.
  • The holographic computation fixes all EFT coefficients, showing which couplings vanish at the saddle-point and probe level, and provides values that can be used in phenomenological modeling.
  • Below $T_c$, the EFT equations yield a homogeneous chiral condensate and propagating pionic phase modes, connecting the critical dynamics to spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking.
  • Systematic higher-order terms beyond model F are included in the EFT, including KPZ-like nonlinearities, and can be used to study non-Gaussian effects near the critical point.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the same EFT could be extended to nonzero quark masses by turning on a matrix source for the condensate, which would turn the sharp transition into a crossover relevant for heavy-ion phenomenology.
  • Because the holographic computation is done in a Schwarzschild-AdS5 background rather than the full Einstein-dilaton geometry, the numerical coefficients are model-dependent even though the action's form is expected to be universal.
  • The vanishing of $c_0$ and $d_0$ at tree level suggests that finite-$N_c$ corrections would generate these couplings, providing a route to estimate how far the large-$N_c$ limit is from real QCD.
  • One could test the EFT directly by simulating the stochastic equations and comparing the resulting dynamic critical exponent with lattice or functional-renormalization-group results.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper constructs a Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory for the dynamics of the chiral charge densities and the chiral condensate near a putative second-order chiral phase transition of two-flavor QCD in the chiral limit, with the energy-momentum sector frozen. The EFT is built from SU(2)_L × SU(2)_R building blocks and constrained by unitarity, rotational invariance, chemical shift symmetry, dynamical KMS symmetry, and Onsager relations. The resulting stochastic equations are argued to reduce, after discarding higher-order terms, to a non-Abelian version of model F of Hohenberg and Halperin. The second half of the paper derives the same type of effective action from a modified soft-wall AdS/QCD model via the holographic Schwinger-Keldysh prescription, computing numerical values for the coefficients such as b0 = 0.290(μc − μ), b1 = −0.348 − 0.0100i, b2 = −0.121, and b3 = −0.022 − 0.100i. The paper closes with a brief discussion of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and Goldstone modes.

Significance. The EFT construction is systematic and technically non-trivial: it extends previous hydrodynamic EFTs for non-Abelian conserved charges by adding a bi-fundamental order parameter, and it makes explicit the constraints imposed by KMS and chemical shift symmetry. The holographic calculation is also involved, requiring a numerical treatment of the bulk scalar sector, and it provides explicit coefficients and consistency relations that go beyond pure symmetry counting. The paper is honest about several limitations: the energy-momentum sector is frozen, the Schwarzschild-AdS5 background is a qualitative substitute for a QCD-like geometry, and the probe limit is used. These limitations, however, directly affect the paper's central claim about real QCD, so the current version overstates its scope. The result is best read as an EFT and holographic construction for a chiral non-Abelian superfluid with frozen stress tensor, not as a confirmed EFT for the QCD chiral transition.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 1; Sec. 4] The paper's central claim, as stated in the abstract and title, is an EFT for two-flavor QCD near the chiral phase transition. However, Section 1 explicitly freezes the energy and momentum densities and notes that including them would put real QCD in model H [47]. Because the set of dynamical variables determines the dynamic universality class, the EFT constructed here describes a system with a frozen stress tensor, not real QCD. The abstract and conclusion should be reframed accordingly, or the energy-momentum sector must be included; the statement in Section 4 that this is future work does not resolve the overstatement in the abstract.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.53)] The holographic computation returns c0 = c1 = d0 = d1 = 0. In the stochastic equations (2.38), these are the coefficients that couple the order parameter to the chiral charge densities: the c0 and d0 terms appear in the ∂0Or equation, while the c1 and d1 terms appear in the density equations. Their vanishing at tree level means the holographic model, at the order computed, does not exhibit the reversible mode coupling that defines model F; it reduces to independent charge diffusion plus a relaxational order parameter. The remark that loop effects may generate these terms is not a computation. Since the paper claims both that the holographic derivation confirms the EFT and that the EFT resembles model F, this gap should be addressed or the claim should be weakened.
  3. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.26); Sec. 3.3, Eqs. (3.45) and (3.53)] The Onsager relation stated in Eq. (2.26) is c2 = −d2 = b2. The holographic coefficients are b2 = −0.121, c2 = 0.121, and d2 = −0.121. Thus c2 = −d2 holds, but the equality c2 = b2 does not; unless a different sign convention is intended, the holographic results violate the stated Onsager constraint. The paper's assertion that the holographic results satisfy all symmetries of Section 2.1 is therefore not supported as written.
  4. [Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 3.3] The holographic confirmation is carried out in Schwarzschild-AdS5, which the authors describe as a qualitative substitute for the Einstein-dilaton black brane dual to QCD, and in the probe limit with the metric and dilaton frozen. The authors acknowledge that the coefficient values are specific to this setup and may differ in real QCD. Nevertheless, the abstract and the Summary section state that the EFT is 'confirmed' by the holographic derivation. At most, the holographic computation shows consistency of the EFT form in a toy model sharing the same symmetries and operator content; it does not confirm the QCD values of the coefficients. The language should be adjusted to reflect this limitation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4, first paragraph] The phrase 'long-wavelength lone-time dynamics' contains a typo; it should read 'long-wavelength long-time dynamics'.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (3.52)] The left-hand sides of the two equations in (3.52) are labeled m(2)_1 and m(2)_2, but the surrounding text and Eq. (3.50) indicate these are the third-order coefficients m(3)_s; the labels should be corrected.
  3. [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (2.2)] The gauge transformation displayed for Aμ appears to be missing parentheses around the factor (Aμ + i∂μ), which makes the equation hard to parse; the notation should be clarified.
  4. [Sec. 2.3, paragraph before Eq. (2.38)] The sentence 'Presumably, the effective theory we constructed corresponds to a non-Abelian superfluid near the critical temperature' is vague, since the superfluid analogy is only developed later; the connection could be stated more precisely.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the EFT is symmetry-constrained and the holographic calculation independently fixes the coefficients, with only a minor translucent self-citation of the authors’ own earlier holographic solutions.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation has two independent strands. First, the EFT action in Section 2 is constructed from the stated symmetries (unitarity, rotation invariance, flavor symmetry, chemical shift symmetry, dynamical KMS symmetry, Onsager relations) with the dynamical variables chosen as chiral charge densities and the chiral condensate; no coefficient is fitted to the stochastic equations or to model F. The claim that the resulting stochastic equations resemble model F is made after deriving them, and the paper explicitly identifies which higher-order terms must be dropped for that comparison. Second, the holographic computation in Section 3 solves a modified AdS/QCD bulk action with fixed boundary data, imposing independent horizon conditions, and obtains numerical coefficients (e.g., b0 = 0.290(mu_c - mu), b1 = -0.348 - 0.0100i, b2 = -0.121, b3 = -0.022 - 0.100i in Eq. (3.45)) by solving bulk equations rather than by imposing the target EFT action. The gauge-sector perturbative solutions are recycled from the authors' earlier papers [40, 41], but the relevant coefficients are reproduced in this paper and the dependence is not on the target result; neither the EFT form nor the coefficient values are assumed in the bulk calculation. The one mildly self-referential element is that the holographic SK technique itself comes from the same research lineage [32, 35, 38, 40, 41], but this is a methodological citation, not a load-bearing circular step, and the calculation is presented self-contained enough to be checked. The paper transparently concedes that freezing energy-momentum places it in model F rather than model H for real QCD (Section 1 and the probe-limit discussion in Section 3), which is a correctness/scope limitation, not a circularity. No predicted quantity is defined in terms of the fit, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked to forbid alternatives. Score 1 reflects only the minor self-citation of the preceding holographic SK literature.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Schwinger-Keldysh symmetries plus a set of domain assumptions about the chiral transition and the holographic model. The main free parameters are the bulk scalar mass tuning and the quartic coupling, which set the critical point and the strength of nonlinearities. No genuinely new physical entity is postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • mu (bulk scalar mass parameter) = mu_c = 2.40 r_h^2; delta_mu small deviation
    Introduced in the modified AdS/QCD action (3.2) as an r-dependent mass term m_0^2 - mu^2/r^2. The critical value mu_c is chosen so the order parameter vanishes at zero source, placing the model at the chiral critical point; delta_mu controls b0 ~ (T - T_c).
  • a (quartic self-coupling of bulk scalar) = not numerically fixed; enters chi1 = 0.0156 a
    Free parameter of the bulk potential |X|^4 in (3.2). It affects the quartic coefficient chi1 in the boundary EFT but is not determined by the paper.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Two-flavor QCD in the chiral limit has a second-order chiral phase transition in the O(4)/model G universality class.
    Invoked in the abstract and Introduction via Refs. [1,9,10]; the entire EFT construction presumes a critical point at T_c with the chiral condensate as order parameter.
  • domain assumption Energy and momentum fluctuations can be neglected near the transition.
    Stated in Section 1 and implemented as the probe limit in Section 3.1. The paper acknowledges that including them changes the universality class to model H [47].
  • ad hoc to paper The Schwarzschild-AdS5 black brane can serve as the thermal background for the holographic computation.
    Section 3.1 explicitly replaces the numerical Einstein-dilaton black brane with Schwarzschild-AdS5 'as a qualitative study', justified by universality rather than by matching QCD thermodynamics.
  • domain assumption The modified AdS/QCD model (3.2) with the phenomenological r-dependent mass term captures the relevant chiral dynamics.
    The paper calls the r-dependent mass a 'phenomenological input' (Section 3.1). The quartic term and gauge sector are standard but the specific model is chosen for convenience.
  • standard math The SK constraints (unitarity, KMS, chemical shift, Onsager) are complete for this system.
    These symmetries are established in the hydrodynamic EFT literature [21,22,25] and are applied without modification in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption Scaling ∂_0 ~ ∂_i^2 in the symmetric phase justifies dropping second-order time derivatives and higher-order terms.
    Used in Section 2.3 to reduce the equations to first-order form matching model F; cited to [11].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral phase transition: effective field theory and holography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5OFYP7ZR

@misc{pith2026241208882,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral phase transition: effective field theory and holography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5OFYP7ZR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08882}
}
read the original abstract

We consider the chiral phase transition relevant for QCD matter at finite temperature but with vanishing baryon density. Presumably, the chiral phase transition is of second order for two-flavor QCD in the chiral limit. Near the transition temperature, we apply the Schwinger-Keldysh formalism and construct a low-energy effective field theory for the system, in which fluctuations and dissipations are systematically captured. The dynamical variables involve the chiral charge densities and order parameter (chiral condensate). Via the holographic Schwinger-Keldysh technique, the effective action is further confirmed within a modified AdS/QCD model. With higher-order terms suitably neglected, the stochastic equations derived from the effective field theory resemble those of model F in the Hohenberg-Halperin classification. Within the effective field theory, we briefly discuss the spontaneous breaking of chiral symmetry and Goldstone modes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08882 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: complexified double AdS (analytically continued near the horizon) [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Witten diagrams for B0ΣΣ† -terms in the boundary action. Left: the Witten diagram at the tree level. It vanishes simply due to the absence of the bulk vertices X †XAL0 and X †XAR0 . Right: the Witten diagram at the one-loop level. The inner lines forming the bulk loop may represent bulk gauge fields, complex scalar field, and bulk gravitons (if beyond the probe limit). In particular, the dynamical KMS symmetry and t… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [47]

    Dynamic universality class of the QCD critical point,

    D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, “Dynamic universality class of the QCD critical point,” Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 056001,arXiv:hep-ph/0401052

    arXiv 2004

  2. [1]

    On the order of the QCD chiral phase transition for different numbers of quark flavours,

    F. Cuteri, O. Philipsen, and A. Sciarra, “On the order of the QCD chiral phase transition for different numbers of quark flavours,”JHEP11(2021) 141, arXiv:2107.12739 [hep-lat]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [2]

    Dynamics of QCD Matter -- current status

    A. Jaiswalet al., “Dynamics of QCD matter — current status,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. E30 no. 02, (2021) 2130001,arXiv:2007.14959 [hep-ph]. [3]MUSESCollaboration, R. Kumaret al., “Theoretical and experimental constraints for the equation of state of dense and hot matter,”Living Rev. Rel.27no. 1, (2024) 3, arXiv:2303.17021 [nucl-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    On the phase diagram of QCD,

    A. M. Halasz, A. D. Jackson, R. E. Shrock, M. A. Stephanov, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, “On the phase diagram of QCD,”Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 096007, arXiv:hep-ph/9804290

    arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    Mapping the Phases of Quantum Chromodynamics with Beam Energy Scan,

    A. Bzdak, S. Esumi, V. Koch, J. Liao, M. Stephanov, and N. Xu, “Mapping the Phases of Quantum Chromodynamics with Beam Energy Scan,”Phys. Rept.853(2020) 1–87, arXiv:1906.00936 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    The QCD phase diagram and Beam Energy Scan physics: a theory overview,

    L. Du, A. Sorensen, and M. Stephanov, “The QCD phase diagram and Beam Energy Scan physics: a theory overview,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33no. 07, (2024) 2430008, arXiv:2402.10183 [nucl-th]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    A Study of the Properties of the QCD Phase Diagram in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions,

    X. Luo, S. Shi, N. Xu, and Y. Zhang, “A Study of the Properties of the QCD Phase Diagram in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions,”Particles3no. 2, (2020) 278–307, arXiv:2004.00789 [nucl-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Heavy-Ion Collisions at F AIR-NICA Energies,

    P. Senger, “Heavy-Ion Collisions at F AIR-NICA Energies,”Particles4no. 2, (2021) 214–226

    work page 2021

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Remarks on the Chiral Phase Transition in Chromodynamics,

    R. D. Pisarski and F. Wilczek, “Remarks on the Chiral Phase Transition in Chromodynamics,”Phys. Rev. D29(1984) 338–341

    1984

  2. [10]

    Static and dynamic critical phenomena at a second order QCD phase transition,

    K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, “Static and dynamic critical phenomena at a second order QCD phase transition,”Nucl. Phys. B399(1993) 395–425,arXiv:hep-ph/9210253. 25

    1993 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Theory of dynamic critical phenomena,

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, “Theory of dynamic critical phenomena,”Rev. Mod. Phys.49(Jul, 1977) 435–479. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.49.435

    1977 doi

  4. [12]

    Real time pion propagation in finite temperature QCD,

    D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, “Real time pion propagation in finite temperature QCD,”Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 076011,arXiv:hep-ph/0204226

    2002 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Pion propagation near the QCD chiral phase transition,

    D. T. Son and M. A. Stephanov, “Pion propagation near the QCD chiral phase transition,”Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 202302,arXiv:hep-ph/0111100

    2002 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Hydrodynamics of nuclear matter in the chiral limit,

    D. T. Son, “Hydrodynamics of nuclear matter in the chiral limit,”Phys. Rev. Lett.84 (2000) 3771–3774,arXiv:hep-ph/9912267

    2000 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Transport and hydrodynamics in the chiral limit,

    E. Grossi, A. Soloviev, D. Teaney, and F. Yan, “Transport and hydrodynamics in the chiral limit,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 1, (2020) 014042,arXiv:2005.02885 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Soft pions and transport near the chiral critical point,

    E. Grossi, A. Soloviev, D. Teaney, and F. Yan, “Soft pions and transport near the chiral critical point,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 3, (2021) 034025,arXiv:2101.10847 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Dynamics of theO(4) critical point in QCD,

    A. Florio, E. Grossi, A. Soloviev, and D. Teaney, “Dynamics of theO(4) critical point in QCD,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 5, (2022) 054512,arXiv:2111.03640 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Pion dynamics in a soft-wall AdS-QCD model,

    X. Cao, M. Baggioli, H. Liu, and D. Li, “Pion dynamics in a soft-wall AdS-QCD model,” JHEP12(2022) 113,arXiv:2210.09088 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Soft modes in hot QCD matter,

    J. Braunet al., “Soft modes in hot QCD matter,”arXiv:2310.19853 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    Dynamic critical behavior of the chiral phase transition from the real-time functional renormalization group,

    J. V. Roth, Y. Ye, S. Schlichting, and L. von Smekal, “Dynamic critical behavior of the chiral phase transition from the real-time functional renormalization group,” arXiv:2403.04573 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Effective field theory of dissipative fluids,

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, and H. Liu, “Effective field theory of dissipative fluids,”JHEP 09(2017) 095,arXiv:1511.03646 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Effective field theory of dissipative fluids (II): classical limit, dynamical KMS symmetry and entropy current,

    P. Glorioso, M. Crossley, and H. Liu, “Effective field theory of dissipative fluids (II): classical limit, dynamical KMS symmetry and entropy current,”JHEP09(2017) 096, arXiv:1701.07817 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Topological sigma models & dissipative hydrodynamics,

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, “Topological sigma models & dissipative hydrodynamics,”JHEP04(2016) 039,arXiv:1511.07809 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Effective Action for Relativistic Hydrodynamics: Fluctuations, Dissipation, and Entropy Inflow,

    F. M. Haehl, R. Loganayagam, and M. Rangamani, “Effective Action for Relativistic Hydrodynamics: Fluctuations, Dissipation, and Entropy Inflow,”JHEP10(2018) 194, arXiv:1803.11155 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics,

    H. Liu and P. Glorioso, “Lectures on non-equilibrium effective field theories and fluctuating hydrodynamics,”PoS305(2018) 008,arXiv:1805.09331 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200. 26

    1998 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,”Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114,arXiv:hep-th/9802109

    1998 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291,arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    1998 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Schwinger-Keldysh propagators from AdS/CFT correspondence,

    C. P. Herzog and D. T. Son, “Schwinger-Keldysh propagators from AdS/CFT correspondence,”JHEP03(2003) 046,arXiv:hep-th/0212072

    2003 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Real-time gauge/gravity duality,

    K. Skenderis and B. C. van Rees, “Real-time gauge/gravity duality,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(2008) 081601,arXiv:0805.0150 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Real-time gauge/gravity duality: Prescription, Renormalization and Examples,

    K. Skenderis and B. C. van Rees, “Real-time gauge/gravity duality: Prescription, Renormalization and Examples,”JHEP05(2009) 085,arXiv:0812.2909 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  24. [32]

    A prescription for holographic Schwinger-Keldysh contour in non-equilibrium systems,

    P. Glorioso, M. Crossley, and H. Liu, “A prescription for holographic Schwinger-Keldysh contour in non-equilibrium systems,”arXiv:1812.08785 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theories,

    J. de Boer, M. P. Heller, and N. Pinzani-Fokeeva, “Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theories,”JHEP05(2019) 188,arXiv:1812.06093 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Nonlinear Langevin dynamics via holography,

    B. Chakrabarty, J. Chakravarty, S. Chaudhuri, C. Jana, R. Loganayagam, and A. Sivakumar, “Nonlinear Langevin dynamics via holography,”JHEP01(2020) 165, arXiv:1906.07762 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    All order effective action for charge diffusion from Schwinger-Keldysh holography,

    Y. Bu, T. Demircik, and M. Lublinsky, “All order effective action for charge diffusion from Schwinger-Keldysh holography,”JHEP05(2021) 187,arXiv:2012.08362 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Ginzburg-Landau effective action for a fluctuating holographic superconductor,

    Y. Bu, M. Fujita, and S. Lin, “Ginzburg-Landau effective action for a fluctuating holographic superconductor,”JHEP09(2021) 168,arXiv:2106.00556 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Schwinger-Keldysh effective action for a relativistic Brownian particle in the AdS/CFT correspondence,

    Y. Bu and B. Zhang, “Schwinger-Keldysh effective action for a relativistic Brownian particle in the AdS/CFT correspondence,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 8, (2021) 086002, arXiv:2108.10060 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh field theory of SU(2) diffusion,

    Y. Bu, X. Sun, and B. Zhang, “Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh field theory of SU(2) diffusion,”JHEP08(2022) 223,arXiv:2205.00195 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Nonlinear effective dynamics of a Brownian particle in magnetized plasma,

    Y. Bu, B. Zhang, and J. Zhang, “Nonlinear effective dynamics of a Brownian particle in magnetized plasma,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 8, (2022) 086014,arXiv:2210.02274 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    U(1) quasi-hydrodynamics: Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory and holography,

    M. Baggioli, Y. Bu, and V. Ziogas, “U(1) quasi-hydrodynamics: Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theory and holography,”JHEP09(2023) 019,arXiv:2304.14173 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Nearly critical superfluid: effective field theory and holography,

    Y. Bu, H. Gao, X. Gao, and Z. Li, “Nearly critical superfluid: effective field theory and holography,”JHEP07(2024) 104,arXiv:2401.12294 [hep-th]. 27

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theories including a non-hydrodynamic mode,

    Y. Liu, Y.-W. Sun, and X.-M. Wu, “Holographic Schwinger-Keldysh effective field theories including a non-hydrodynamic mode,”arXiv:2411.16306 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Chiral Anomalous Magnetohydrodynamics in action: effective field theory and holography,

    M. Baggioli, Y. Bu, and X. Sun, “Chiral Anomalous Magnetohydrodynamics in action: effective field theory and holography,”arXiv:2412.02361 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Quantum Decoherence with Holography,

    S.-H. Ho, W. Li, F.-L. Lin, and B. Ning, “Quantum Decoherence with Holography,” JHEP01(2014) 170,arXiv:1309.5855 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Effective field theory of stochastic diffusion from gravity,

    J. K. Ghosh, R. Loganayagam, S. G. Prabhu, M. Rangamani, A. Sivakumar, and V. Vishal, “Effective field theory of stochastic diffusion from gravity,”JHEP05(2021) 130,arXiv:2012.03999 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    An effective description of momentum diffusion in a charged plasma from holography,

    T. He, R. Loganayagam, M. Rangamani, and J. Virrueta, “An effective description of momentum diffusion in a charged plasma from holography,”arXiv:2108.03244 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  39. [48]

    Hydrodynamics in lattice models with continuous non-Abelian symmetries,

    P. Glorioso, L. V. Delacr´ etaz, X. Chen, R. M. Nandkishore, and A. Lucas, “Hydrodynamics in lattice models with continuous non-Abelian symmetries,”SciPost Phys.10no. 1, (2021) 015,arXiv:2007.13753 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Schwinger-Keldysh effective action for hydrodynamics with approximate symmetries,

    M. Hongo, N. Sogabe, M. A. Stephanov, and H.-U. Yee, “Schwinger-Keldysh effective action for hydrodynamics with approximate symmetries,”arXiv:2411.08016 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  41. [50]

    Nearly critical superfluids in Keldysh-Schwinger formalism,

    A. Donos and P. Kailidis, “Nearly critical superfluids in Keldysh-Schwinger formalism,” JHEP01(2024) 110,arXiv:2304.06008 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Dynamic universality class of large-N gauge theories,

    M. Natsuume and T. Okamura, “Dynamic universality class of large-N gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 046008,arXiv:1012.0575 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Chiral Phase Transition in the Soft-Wall Model of AdS/QCD,

    K. Chelabi, Z. Fang, M. Huang, D. Li, and Y.-L. Wu, “Chiral Phase Transition in the Soft-Wall Model of AdS/QCD,”JHEP04(2016) 036,arXiv:1512.06493 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Realization of chiral symmetry breaking and restoration in holographic QCD,

    K. Chelabi, Z. Fang, M. Huang, D. Li, and Y.-L. Wu, “Realization of chiral symmetry breaking and restoration in holographic QCD,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 10, (2016) 101901, arXiv:1511.02721 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Critical exponents of finite temperature chiral phase transition in soft-wall AdS/QCD models,

    J. Chen, S. He, M. Huang, and D. Li, “Critical exponents of finite temperature chiral phase transition in soft-wall AdS/QCD models,”JHEP01(2019) 165, arXiv:1810.07019 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [55]

    QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,

    J. Erlich, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, “QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 261602,arXiv:hep-ph/0501128

    2005 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Dynamic Scaling of Growing Interfaces,

    M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.-C. Zhang, “Dynamic Scaling of Growing Interfaces,”Phys. Rev. Lett.56(1986) 889. 28

    1986

  48. [57]

    Nearly critical holographic superfluids,

    A. Donos and P. Kailidis, “Nearly critical holographic superfluids,”JHEP12(2022) 028, arXiv:2210.06513 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 07, 232 (2023)]

    2022 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Mimicking the QCD equation of state with a dual black hole,

    S. S. Gubser and A. Nellore, “Mimicking the QCD equation of state with a dual black hole,”Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 086007,arXiv:0804.0434 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Thermodynamics and bulk viscosity of approximate black hole duals to finite temperature quantum chromodynamics,

    S. S. Gubser, A. Nellore, S. S. Pufu, and F. D. Rocha, “Thermodynamics and bulk viscosity of approximate black hole duals to finite temperature quantum chromodynamics,”Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 131601,arXiv:0804.1950 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Deconfinement and Gluon Plasma Dynamics in Improved Holographic QCD,

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti, and F. Nitti, “Deconfinement and Gluon Plasma Dynamics in Improved Holographic QCD,”Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 181601, arXiv:0804.0899 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Holography and Thermodynamics of 5D Dilaton-gravity,

    U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti, and F. Nitti, “Holography and Thermodynamics of 5D Dilaton-gravity,”JHEP05(2009) 033,arXiv:0812.0792 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  53. [62]

    A holographic critical point,

    O. DeWolfe, S. S. Gubser, and C. Rosen, “A holographic critical point,”Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 086005,arXiv:1012.1864 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Momentum transport in strongly coupled anisotropic plasmas in the presence of strong magnetic fields,

    S. I. Finazzo, R. Critelli, R. Rougemont, and J. Noronha, “Momentum transport in strongly coupled anisotropic plasmas in the presence of strong magnetic fields,”Phys. Rev. D94no. 5, (2016) 054020,arXiv:1605.06061 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 96, 019903 (2017)]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Holographic QCD phase diagram with critical point from Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton dynamics,

    J. Knaute, R. Yaresko, and B. K¨ ampfer, “Holographic QCD phase diagram with critical point from Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton dynamics,”Phys. Lett. B778(2018) 419–425, arXiv:1702.06731 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Critical point in the phase diagram of primordial quark-gluon matter from black hole physics,

    R. Critelli, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo, C. Ratti, and R. Rougemont, “Critical point in the phase diagram of primordial quark-gluon matter from black hole physics,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 9, (2017) 096026,arXiv:1706.00455 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Off-shell hydrodynamics from holography,

    M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, H. Liu, and Y. Wang, “Off-shell hydrodynamics from holography,”JHEP02(2016) 124,arXiv:1504.07611 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  58. [67]

    Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,

    K. Skenderis, “Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,”Class. Quant. Grav.19 (2002) 5849–5876,arXiv:hep-th/0209067

    2002 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Holographic Renormalisation and the Electroweak Precision Parameters,

    M. Round, “Holographic Renormalisation and the Electroweak Precision Parameters,” Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 053002,arXiv:1003.2933 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Boundary Conditions and New Dualities: Vector Fields in AdS/CFT,

    D. Marolf and S. F. Ross, “Boundary Conditions and New Dualities: Vector Fields in AdS/CFT,”JHEP11(2006) 085,arXiv:hep-th/0606113

    2006 arXiv

  61. [70]

    Modeling the diffusive dynamics of critical fluctuations near the QCD critical point,

    M. Nahrgang and M. Bluhm, “Modeling the diffusive dynamics of critical fluctuations near the QCD critical point,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 9, (2020) 094017, arXiv:2007.10371 [nucl-th]. 29

    2020

  62. [71]

    Probing QCD critical point and induced gravitational wave by black hole physics,

    R.-G. Cai, S. He, L. Li, and Y.-X. Wang, “Probing QCD critical point and induced gravitational wave by black hole physics,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 12, (2022) L121902, arXiv:2201.02004 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Constraints on holographic QCD phase transitions from PTA observations,

    S. He, L. Li, S. Wang, and S.-J. Wang, “Constraints on holographic QCD phase transitions from PTA observations,”Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68no. 1, (2025) 210411,arXiv:2308.07257 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  64. [73]

    Phase structure and critical phenomena in two-flavor QCD by holography,

    Y.-Q. Zhao, S. He, D. Hou, L. Li, and Z. Li, “Phase structure and critical phenomena in two-flavor QCD by holography,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 8, (2024) 086015, arXiv:2310.13432 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  65. [74]

    QCD Phase Diagram at finite Magnetic Field and Chemical Potential: A Holographic Approach Using Machine Learning,

    R.-G. Cai, S. He, L. Li, and H.-A. Zeng, “QCD Phase Diagram at finite Magnetic Field and Chemical Potential: A Holographic Approach Using Machine Learning,” arXiv:2406.12772 [hep-th]

  66. [75]

    Bayesian location of the QCD critical point from a holographic perspective,

    M. Hippert, J. Grefa, T. A. Manning, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo Vazquez, C. Ratti, R. Rougemont, and M. Trujillo, “Bayesian location of the QCD critical point from a holographic perspective,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 9, (2024) 094006,arXiv:2309.00579 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  67. [76]

    Refining holographic models of the quark-gluon plasma,

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen, and A. Piispa, “Refining holographic models of the quark-gluon plasma,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 12, (2024) 126013,arXiv:2405.02394 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Flavor dependent critical endpoint from holographic QCD through machine learning,

    X. Chen and M. Huang, “Flavor dependent critical endpoint from holographic QCD through machine learning,”JHEP02(2025) 123,arXiv:2405.06179 [hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  69. [78]

    Bayesian Inference of the Critical Endpoint in 2+1-Flavor System from Holographic QCD,

    L. Zhu, X. Chen, K. Zhou, H. Zhang, and M. Huang, “Bayesian Inference of the Critical Endpoint in 2+1-Flavor System from Holographic QCD,”arXiv:2501.17763 [hep-ph]. 30

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.