Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 3 cited by

The curtain lowers on directly detectable higgsino dark matter

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The 2024 LUX-ZEPLIN limits force a higgsino dark matter particle to be almost completely pure, pushing gaugino masses into the multi-TeV range.

desk verdict A careful, well-scoped update of higgsino direct detection constraints from LZ2024, with the decoupled-MSSM assumption stated up front and the resulting bounds honestly caveated. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08958 v2 pith:WMYWBDNT submitted 2024-12-12 hep-ph

Stephen P. Martin This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph PACS 95.35.+d12.60.Jv
keywords higgsinodarkmatterdirectdetectionLUX-ZEPLINgauginomassesmasssplittingsneutrinofogneutralinosupersymmetry
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Under the assumption that all supersymmetric scalars and heavy Higgs bosons are heavy enough to ignore, this paper shows that the 2024 LUX-ZEPLIN limits leave almost no room for a directly detectable higgsino dark matter particle. A higgsino-like lightest neutralino must be nearly pure, which in most cases forces the bino and wino mass parameters into the multi-TeV range, for example $M_1 \gtrsim 1.2$ TeV in the nonthermal case with $\tan\beta=2$ and negative $\mu$. Purity also caps the mass splittings between the higgsino states: $\Delta M_0 \lesssim 11$ GeV and $\Delta M_+ \lesssim 8$–$9$ GeV in the least restrictive thermal cases with $\tan\beta>1.6$. The paper projects that reaching the neutrino fog would strengthen the gaugino-mass bounds only by a factor of about 1.25 to 2.4, so the remaining discovery window is narrow. A sympathetic reader would take from this that direct detection is close to exhausting the easiest searches for higgsino dark matter, pushing the burden to colliders and indirect searches.

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective coupling of a mostly-higgsino LSP to the 125.1 GeV Higgs boson and the Z boson, parameterized by $\chi = c_W^2/(M_2 - n\mu) + s_W^2/(M_1 - n\mu)$ together with the neutral-higgsino mass-splitting parameter $\delta$ of equation (2.3). These quantities vanish in the pure-higgsino limit, so they tie every direct-detection cross section to the higgsino-gaugino mixing and to the mass splittings $\Delta M_0$ and $\Delta M_+$. The argument expands the MSSM neutralino and chargino mass matrices in $m_Z$ with one-loop corrections, then reads the LZ2024 exclusions as contours of fixed purity and mass splitting. This machinery turns the experimental null result into quantitative bounds on model parameters.

What would settle it

A future direct detection signal whose inferred WIMP mass lies between about 100 GeV and 1.1 TeV, combined with a collider measurement of a higgsino-like neutralino mass splitting larger than about 11 GeV, would contradict the paper's central bounds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the 2024 LUX-ZEPLIN null result, together with the decoupled-MSSM setup, imposes stringent purity constraints on a higgsino-like dark matter particle. The spin-independent and spin-dependent cross sections are controlled by the same mixings that split the higgsino states, so the experimental limits translate directly into lower bounds on the gaugino mass parameters $M_1$ and $M_2$ and upper bounds on $\Delta M_0$ and $\Delta M_+$. In the models examined, the least restrictive thermal cases allow $\Delta M_0$ up to about 11 GeV and $\Delta M_+$ up to about 8–9 GeV for $\tan\beta>1.6$, while the nonthermal case already requires $M_1>1.2$ TeV for $\tan\beta=2$, $\mu<0$. The same logic yields projected bounds for the future scenario in which direct detection reaches the neutrino fog.

Load-bearing premise

All squarks, sleptons, the gluino, and the heavy Higgs bosons are heavy enough (set to 10 TeV) that the only relevant scattering processes are exchange of the 125.1 GeV Higgs boson and the Z boson.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The only parameter space left for a directly detectable thermal higgsino is a narrow band: current limits are only a factor of about 1.25–2.4 in gaugino masses above the projected neutrino-fog reach.
  • Collider searches become harder, because the bounded mass splittings mean the chargino decay products are soft, and disappearing-track signatures require extremely pure higgsinos with gaugino masses above about 25 TeV.
  • The soft-lepton excess regions reported by ATLAS and CMS are essentially eliminated as higgsino dark matter candidates by the 2024 limits, since the needed mass splittings are now too large.
  • Future colliders with sufficient energy would be needed to probe the remaining thermal higgsino window: a 100 TeV pp collider or a 10 TeV muon collider is projected to reach the critical mass near 1.1 TeV, while a Higgs factory has little or no reach.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the decoupling assumption is relaxed—say, with lighter squarks or non-decoupled heavy Higgs bosons—the derived bounds weaken; quantifying this relaxation would be a natural next step for model builders.
  • The same purity-versus-mass-splitting translation could be applied to wino-like or mixed bino-wino dark matter, where the annihilation and scattering patterns differ, offering a ready-made framework for future direct-detection projections.
  • If the neutrino fog is reached without a signal, the remaining higgsino window becomes invisible to existing xenon detectors, and the field will have to rely on non-xenon targets, directional detection, or gamma-ray observations to make progress.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper uses the LZ2024 (4.2 tonne-year) direct-detection limits to update constraints on higgsino-like neutralino dark matter in the decoupled MSSM. The author introduces a tree-level expansion in mZ that allows arbitrary signs of M1, M2, and μ, obtains analytic expressions for the mass splittings ΔM0 and ΔM+ and for the LSP couplings to h and Z, and proves that the opposite-sign gaugino quasiblind spot with δ≈0 cannot suppress the cross section to zero without contradicting the definition of n=sign(μδ). Numerically, SOFTSUSY and micrOMEGAs are used to compute relic densities and SI/SD cross sections for gaugino-unification and AMSB-inspired benchmarks, which are then compared with LZ2024 to derive lower bounds on M1 and M2 and upper bounds on ΔM+ and ΔM0 for tanβ≥1.6, separately for thermal and nonthermal relic scenarios. The same pipeline is used to project constraints when the discovery neutrino fog is reached.

Significance. The central claim—that under the stated decoupled-MSSM assumptions the LZ2024 data force gaugino masses into the multi-TeV range in most cases and restrict higgsino mass splittings to O(few–10 GeV)—is internally consistent and directly supported by the figures. I verified the analytic no-perfect-quasiblind-spot argument in Eqs. (2.10)–(2.13): it is valid for tanβ>1, and the paper explicitly notes that the tanβ=1 limit is a separate, model-dependent blind spot. The numerical implementation uses established public codes with stated inputs, and the paper is unusually explicit about the conditional nature of its bounds, listing the tanβ→1, opposite-sign quasiblind-spot, heavy-Higgs interference, and local-density evasions in Section VI. The neutrino-fog projections provide a concrete, falsifiable target; the main value is phenomenological rather than formal, and the paper does not ship code or machine-checked proofs, but its parametric derivations are clear and reproducible in principle.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Section V and Figures 5.1–5.2] The projected SD limits are described only by the phrase 'taken to equal the discovery neutrino fog level as given in ref. [74]'; because the low-mass portions of the Figure 5.2 bounds are set by the SD limit, please state explicitly how the SD fog curve is obtained from that reference (target isotope, exposure convention, and whether the same 3σ discovery-limit definition is used). This is a presentation clarification; I do not see it as altering the LZ2024-based results.
  2. [Captions of Figures 4.2 and 5.1] The AMSB relation is printed as 'M1 = 3.2M1' in these captions and should read 'M1 = 3.2M2', consistent with Eq. (2.16).
  3. [Figures 3.1 and 3.2] The dotted portions of the curves indicate SD exclusion, while the yellow band is the SI exclusion; in grayscale these line styles can be difficult to distinguish, so a legend or a different pattern would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the gaugino mass and splitting bounds are parameter inversions of external LZ2024 cross-section limits under explicitly stated decoupling assumptions; self-citations are for conventions and prior framing, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and externally anchored. Section II defines the MSSM neutralino and chargino mass matrices in Eqs. (2.1)-(2.2) and derives the small-mZ expansions for the mass splittings and the h/Z couplings in Eqs. (2.4), (2.6), and (2.10)-(2.12) directly from those matrices. The no-perfect-quasiblind-spot result in Eqs. (2.10)-(2.13) is a short algebraic proof that tuning chi = 0 would contradict n = sign(mu delta), not an imported uniqueness theorem. The numerical cross sections are generated with public codes SOFTSUSY and micrOMEGAs and compared with the LZ2024 limits [71], an external dataset; the lower bounds on M1 and M2 and the upper bounds on DeltaM+ and DeltaM0 in Sections III and IV are inversions of that data, not predictions fitted to it. The projected neutrino-fog limits in Section V simply place the same cross-section curves at the independently defined fog level of ref. [74]. The author's self-citations [72] and [75] set the scenario and conventions, but no numerical bound or exclusion rests on them; citation [72] is explicitly updated rather than relied upon. Section VI candidly lists evasion mechanisms and states that the displayed bounds are 'not mathematical theorems,' which is a caveat, not a circular dependency. No step was found in which an output is defined in terms of an input, or a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central bounds rest on the MSSM decoupling assumptions and on the treatment of the local dark matter density and nuclear matrix elements. No new entities are introduced. The free parameters are benchmark scan choices, not fit parameters.

free parameters (5)
  • tan_beta_benchmarks = 1.6, 2, 3, 5, 10, 50
    Discrete values chosen by hand to display the dependence of the bounds on tan beta and sign(mu). The limits weaken for small tan beta with mu < 0.
  • M2_over_M1_gaugino_unification = 1.8
    Benchmark proxy for gaugino mass unification at 10 TeV, used throughout Section III.
  • M1_over_M2_AMSB = 3.2
    AMSB-inspired benchmark ratio used in Sections III-V; results are stronger than the unification case.
  • m_decoupling = 10 TeV
    All squarks, sleptons, gluino and heavy Higgs boson masses set to 10 TeV to realize the decoupling limit.
  • Mh = 125.1 GeV
    Lightest Higgs mass fixed to the measured value; central to the h-mediated SI cross sections.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption R-parity is conserved so the lightest neutralino is stable.
    Central assumption for the dark matter interpretation; stated in the Introduction and used throughout.
  • domain assumption Thermal freezeout in standard cosmology sets the relic density, with xi scaling for subdominant higgsinos.
    Eq. (1.2) and surrounding text; the nonthermal case is considered separately.
  • domain assumption All superpartners except neutralinos and charginos and all heavy Higgs bosons are decoupled at 10 TeV, with alpha = beta - pi/2.
    Stated in the abstract and Section II; the weakest structural premise for the numerical bounds.
  • domain assumption M1, M2, mu are real with arbitrary signs, neglecting CP-violating phases.
    Motivated by electron EDM constraints in Section II.
  • standard math The MSSM tree-level neutralino and chargino mass matrices, Eqs. (2.1)-(2.2), and the small-mZ expansion are valid.
    Standard MSSM formalism from ref [75], used in all analytic derivations.
  • domain assumption micrOMEGAs v6.0 default nuclear matrix elements and the O'Hare neutrino fog definition are appropriate.
    Section II and Section V; defaults are conservative and the fog criterion changes by about a factor of 3 if the exclusion fog is used instead of the discovery fog.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The curtain lowers on directly detectable higgsino dark matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WMYWBDNT

@misc{pith2026241208958,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The curtain lowers on directly detectable higgsino dark matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WMYWBDNT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08958}
}
read the original abstract

A higgsino could be some or all of the dark matter, with a mass bounded from above by about 1.1 TeV assuming a thermal freezeout density, and from below by collider searches. Direct detection experiments imply purity constraints on a dark matter higgsino, limiting the mixing with the electroweak gauginos. Using the new strong limits available as of the end of 2024 from the LUX-ZEPLIN experiment, I quantify the resulting lower bounds on gaugino masses and upper bounds on higgsino mass splittings, assuming that the scalar superpartners and Higgs bosons of minimal supersymmetry are in the decoupling limit. Similar bounds are projected for the critical future scenario that direct detection experiments reach the neutrino fog that hampers discovery prospects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08958 by the authors.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. FIG. 2.1: The dependences of spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. FIG. 2.2: The SI cross-section as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows the predicted SI cross-sections for three cases: tan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: FIG. 3.1: SI LSP-nucleon cross-section, scaled by 1 TeV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3_1.png]
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: FIG. 3.2: As in Figure 3.1, but for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3_2.png]
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: FIG. 3.3: The minimum bino-like neutralino mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3_3.png]
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: FIG. 3.4: The minimum wino-like chargino mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: , I show the chargino-LSP mass splitting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: FIG. 4.1: The higgsino-like chargino-LSP mass splitting ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4_1.png]
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: FIG. 4.2: The maximum mass splittings ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4_2.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the projected limits, if the discovery neutrino fog is reached, for the minimum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: FIG. 5.1: Projected limits, if the discovery neutrino fog is reached, for the minimum bino-like neutralino [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5_1.png]
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: FIG. 5.2: Projected limits, if the discovery neutrino fog is reached, for the maximum mass splittings ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5_2.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deciphering compressed electroweakino excesses with MadAnalysis 5

    hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MadAnalysis 5 v1.11 adds validated recasting of two ATLAS compressed-electroweakino searches and shows that a proposed NMSSM scenario fits the soft-lepton and monojet excesses less well than simpler models.

  2. All axion dark matter from supersymmetric models

    hep-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For Z_4^R and Z_8^R discrete R-symmetries, R-parity violating couplings of order 10^-7 make the lightest supersymmetric particle decay in 10^-3 to 10 seconds, so the dark matter is entirely axion cold dark matter.

  3. Current status and prospects of light bino-higgsino dark matter in natural SUSY

    hep-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In natural SUSY with Δ_EW<30, light bino-higgsino neutralinos are always subdominant dark matter (f≤0.02), and HL-LHC can probe the surviving parameter space.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [74]

    Implications of purity constraints on light Higgsinos,

    S. P. Martin, “Implications of purity constraints on light Higgsinos,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.9, 095045 (2024) [arXiv:2403.19598 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,

    N. Aghanim et al. [Planck], “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020) [erratum: Astron. Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)] [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [2]

    Dark Matter,

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan, “Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2406.01705 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  4. [3]

    Implications of supersymmetry breaking with a little hierarchy between gauginos and scalars,

    J. D. Wells, “Implications of supersymmetry breaking with a little hierarchy between gauginos and scalars,” [arXiv:hep-ph/0306127]

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    Aspects of split supersymmetry,

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. F. Giudice and A. Romanino, “Aspects of split supersymmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B 709, 3-46 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0409232]

    arXiv 2005

  6. [5]

    PeV-scale supersymmetry,

    J. D. Wells, “PeV-scale supersymmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 015013 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0411041]

    arXiv 2005

  7. [6]

    Can the mass of the lightest Higgs boson of the min- imal supersymmetric model be larger than m(Z)?,

    H. E. Haber and R. Hempfling, “Can the mass of the lightest Higgs boson of the min- imal supersymmetric model be larger than m(Z)?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1815-1818 (1991) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1815

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.1815 1991

  8. [7]

    Upper bound of the lightest Higgs boson mass in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,

    Y. Okada, M. Yamaguchi and T. Yanagida, “Upper bound of the lightest Higgs boson mass in the minimal supersymmetric standard model,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 85, 1-6 (1991) doi:10.1143/ptp/85.1.1

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp/85.1.1 1991

Show all 117 references
  1. [8]

    Radiative corrections to the masses of supersymmetric Higgs bosons,

    J. R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi and F. Zwirner, “Radiative corrections to the masses of supersymmetric Higgs bosons,” Phys. Lett. B 257, 83-91 (1991) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90863-L

    1991 doi

  2. [9]

    Approximating the radiatively corrected Higgs mass in the minimal supersymmetric model,

    H. E. Haber, R. Hempfling and A. H. Hoang, “Approximating the radiatively corrected Higgs mass in the minimal supersymmetric model,” Z. Phys. C 75, 539-554 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9609331 [hep-ph]]

    1997 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Precision unification and the scale of supersymmetry,

    P. N. Bhattiprolu and J. D. Wells, “Precision unification and the scale of supersymmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.1, L011704 (2024) [arXiv:2309.12954 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Mainly axion cold dark matter from natural supersymmetry,

    K. J. Bae, H. Baer and E. J. Chun, “Mainly axion cold dark matter from natural supersymmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 89, no.3, 031701 (2014) [arXiv:1309.0519 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Natural little hierarchy for SUSY from radiative breaking of the Peccei-Quinn symmetry,

    K. J. Bae, H. Baer and H. Serce, “Natural little hierarchy for SUSY from radiative breaking of the Peccei-Quinn symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 91, no.1, 015003 (2015) [arXiv:1410.7500 [hep-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Prospects for axion detection in natural SUSY with mixed axion- higgsino dark matter: back to invisible?,

    K. J. Bae, H. Baer and H. Serce, “Prospects for axion detection in natural SUSY with mixed axion- higgsino dark matter: back to invisible?,” JCAP 06, 024 (2017) [arXiv:1705.01134 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [14]

    discovery neutrino fog

    , (2.8) gZ = |N14|2 − |N13|2 /2, (2.9) where the unitary neutralino mixing matrix elements Nij are chosen such that N ∗M ˜N N −1 is diagonal with positive real eigenvalues. Defining a common factor χ = c2 W M2 − nµ + s2 W M1 − nµ , (2.10) one finds in the decoupling limit α = ...

    2024

  8. [15]

    Wino cold dark matter from anomaly mediated SUSY breaking,

    T. Moroi and L. Randall, “Wino cold dark matter from anomaly mediated SUSY breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B 570, 455-472 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/9906527]

    2000 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Is the magnitude of the Peccei–Quinn scale set by the landscape?,

    H. Baer, V. Barger, D. Sengupta, H. Serce, K. Sinha and R. W. Deal, “Is the magnitude of the Peccei–Quinn scale set by the landscape?,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, no.11, 897 (2019) [arXiv:1905.00443 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Neutralino with the right cold dark matter abundance in (almost) any supersymmetric model,

    G. B. Gelmini and P. Gondolo, “Neutralino with the right cold dark matter abundance in (almost) any supersymmetric model,” Phys. Rev. D 74, 023510 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0602230]

    2006 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Higgsino and wino dark matter from Q ball decay,

    M. Fujii and K. Hamaguchi, “Higgsino and wino dark matter from Q ball decay,” Phys. Lett. B 525, 143-149 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0110072 [hep-ph]]

    2002 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Higgsino Dark Matter in a Non-Standard History of the Universe,

    C. Han, “Higgsino Dark Matter in a Non-Standard History of the Universe,” Phys. Lett. B 798, 134997 (2019) [arXiv:1907.09235 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [20]

    The Effect of a late decaying scalar on the neutralino relic density,

    G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, A. Soldatenko and C. E. Yaguna, “The Effect of a late decaying scalar on the neutralino relic density,” Phys. Rev. D 74, 083514 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0605016 [hep-ph]]

    2006 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Light Higgsino dark matter,

    M. Drees, M. M. Nojiri, D. P. Roy and Y. Yamada, “Light Higgsino dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 56, 276-290 (1997) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 64, 039901 (2001)] [arXiv:hep-ph/9701219]

    1997 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Non-thermal production of Higgsino dark matter by late- decaying scalar fields,

    H. Fukuda, Q. Li, T. Moroi and A. Niki, “Non-thermal production of Higgsino dark matter by late- decaying scalar fields,” [arXiv:2410.15733 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  16. [23]

    Neutralino dark matter in focus point supersymmetry,

    J. L. Feng, K. T. Matchev and F. Wilczek, “Neutralino dark matter in focus point supersymmetry,” Phys. Lett. B 482, 388-399 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0004043 [hep-ph]]

    2000 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Phenomenology of Massive Vectorlike Doublet Leptons,

    S. D. Thomas and J. D. Wells, “Phenomenology of Massive Vectorlike Doublet Leptons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 34-37 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9804359]

    1998 arXiv

  18. [25]

    A Statistical analysis of supersymmetric dark matter in the MSSM after WMAP,

    S. Profumo and C. E. Yaguna, “A Statistical analysis of supersymmetric dark matter in the MSSM after WMAP,” Phys. Rev. D 70, 095004 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0407036]

    2004 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Split supersymmetry,

    G. F. Giudice and A. Romanino, “Split supersymmetry,” Nucl. Phys. B 699, 65-89 (2004) [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B 706, 487-487 (2005)] [arXiv:hep-ph/0406088]. 21

    2004 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Hidden SUSY at the LHC: the light higgsino-world scenario and the role of a lepton collider,

    H. Baer, V. Barger and P. Huang, “Hidden SUSY at the LHC: the light higgsino-world scenario and the role of a lepton collider,” JHEP 11, 031 (2011) [arXiv:1107.5581 [hep-ph]]

    2011 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Non-perturbative effect on dark matter anni- hilation and gamma ray signature from galactic center,

    J. Hisano, S. Matsumoto, M. M. Nojiri and O. Saito, “Non-perturbative effect on dark matter anni- hilation and gamma ray signature from galactic center,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 063528 (2005) [arXiv:hep- ph/0412403]

    2005

  22. [29]

    Same sign diboson signature from supersymmetry models with light higgsinos at the LHC,

    H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang, D. Mickelson, A. Mustafayev, W. Sreethawong and X. Tata, “Same sign diboson signature from supersymmetry models with light higgsinos at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, no.15, 151801 (2013) [arXiv:1302.5816 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Radiative natural super- symmetry: Reconciling electroweak fine-tuning and the Higgs boson mass,

    H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang, D. Mickelson, A. Mustafayev and X. Tata, “Radiative natural super- symmetry: Reconciling electroweak fine-tuning and the Higgs boson mass,” Phys. Rev. D 87, no.11, 115028 (2013) [arXiv:1212.2655 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Monojets and mono-photons from light higgsino pair production at LHC14,

    H. Baer, A. Mustafayev and X. Tata, “Monojets and mono-photons from light higgsino pair production at LHC14,” Phys. Rev. D 89, no.5, 055007 (2014) [arXiv:1401.1162 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Compressed electroweakino spectra at the LHC,

    P. Schwaller and J. Zurita, “Compressed electroweakino spectra at the LHC,” JHEP 03, 060 (2014) [arXiv:1312.7350 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Neutralino dark matter at 14 TeV and 100 TeV,

    M. Low and L. T. Wang, “Neutralino dark matter at 14 TeV and 100 TeV,” JHEP 08, 161 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2014)161 [arXiv:1404.0682 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Hunting quasidegenerate Higgsinos,

    Z. Han, G. D. Kribs, A. Martin and A. Menon, “Hunting quasidegenerate Higgsinos,” Phys. Rev. D 89, no.7, 075007 (2014) [arXiv:1401.1235 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Light Higgsinos in Pure Gravity Mediation,

    J. L. Evans, M. Ibe, K. A. Olive and T. T. Yanagida, “Light Higgsinos in Pure Gravity Mediation,” Phys. Rev. D 91, 055008 (2015) [arXiv:1412.3403 [hep-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Higgsino Dark Matter in High-Scale Supersymmetry,

    N. Nagata and S. Shirai, “Higgsino Dark Matter in High-Scale Supersymmetry,” JHEP 01, 029 (2015) [arXiv:1410.4549 [hep-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Closing the window for compressed Dark Sectors with disappearing charged tracks,

    R. Mahbubani, P. Schwaller and J. Zurita, “Closing the window for compressed Dark Sectors with disappearing charged tracks,” JHEP 06, 119 (2017) [erratum: JHEP 10, 061 (2017)] [arXiv:1703.05327 [hep-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Supersymmetry with radiatively- driven naturalness: implications for WIMP and axion searches,

    K. J. Bae, H. Baer, V. Barger, M. R. Savoy and H. Serce, “Supersymmetry with radiatively- driven naturalness: implications for WIMP and axion searches,” Symmetry 7, no.2, 788-814 (2015) [arXiv:1503.04137 [hep-ph]]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [39]

    The discreet charm of higgsino dark matter - a pocket review,

    K. Kowalska and E. M. Sessolo, “The discreet charm of higgsino dark matter - a pocket review,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2018, 6828560 (2018) [arXiv:1802.04097 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Higgsino Dark Matter or Not: Role of Disappearing Track Searches at the LHC and Future Colliders,

    H. Fukuda, N. Nagata, H. Otono and S. Shirai, “Higgsino Dark Matter or Not: Role of Disappearing Track Searches at the LHC and Future Colliders,” Phys. Lett. B781, 306-311 (2018) [arXiv:1703.09675 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Electroweak Dark Matter at Future Hadron Colliders,

    T. Han, S. Mukhopadhyay and X. Wang, “Electroweak Dark Matter at Future Hadron Colliders,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no.3, 035026 (2018) [arXiv:1805.00015 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [42]

    It is notable that the disappearing track searches do not impact the supersymmetric parameter space at all except for ultrapure higgsinos with M1 > 25 TeV

    (the upper part), and by the union of the ATLAS [102] and CMS [103] exclusion regions for disappearing track searches (the lower part). It is notable that the disappearing track searches do not impact the supersymmetric parameter space at all except for ultrapure higgsinos wit...

    2024

  36. [43]

    Is natural higgsino-only dark matter excluded?,

    H. Baer, V. Barger, D. Sengupta and X. Tata, “Is natural higgsino-only dark matter excluded?,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78, no.10, 838 (2018) [arXiv:1803.11210 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Cornering Higgsinos Using Soft Displaced Tracks,

    H. Fukuda, N. Nagata, H. Oide, H. Otono and S. Shirai, “Cornering Higgsinos Using Soft Displaced Tracks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, no.10, 101801 (2020) [arXiv:1910.08065 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [45]

    The LHC higgsino discovery plane for present and future SUSY searches,

    H. Baer, V. Barger, S. Salam, D. Sengupta and X. Tata, “The LHC higgsino discovery plane for present and future SUSY searches,” Phys. Lett. B 810, 135777 (2020) [arXiv:2007.09252 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Prospects for detecting heavy WIMP dark matter with the Cherenkov Telescope Array: The Wino and Higgsino,

    L. Rinchiuso, O. Macias, E. Moulin, N. L. Rodd and T. R. Slatyer, “Prospects for detecting heavy WIMP dark matter with the Cherenkov Telescope Array: The Wino and Higgsino,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.2, 023011 (2021) [arXiv:2008.00692 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Higgsino Dark Matter in the MSSM,

    A. Delgado and M. Quir´ os, “Higgsino Dark Matter in the MSSM,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.1, 015024 (2021) [arXiv:2008.00954 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Race to find split Higgsino dark matter,

    R. T. Co, B. Sheff and J. D. Wells, “Race to find split Higgsino dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.3, 035012 (2022) [arXiv:2105.12142 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [49]

    New angular and other cuts to improve the Higgsino signal at the LHC,

    H. Baer, V. Barger, D. Sengupta and X. Tata, “New angular and other cuts to improve the Higgsino signal at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.9, 095017 (2022) [arXiv:2109.14030 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Exploring nearly degenerate higgsinos using mono- 22 Z/W signal,

    L. M. Carpenter, H. Gilmer and J. Kawamura, “Exploring nearly degenerate higgsinos using mono- 22 Z/W signal,” Phys. Lett. B 831, 137191 (2022) [arXiv:2110.04185 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Higgsino dark matter in pure gravity mediated supersymmetry,

    J. L. Evans and K. A. Olive, “Higgsino dark matter in pure gravity mediated supersymmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.5, 055026 (2022) [arXiv:2202.07830 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Angular cuts to reduce the τ ¯τ jbackground to the higgsino signal at the LHC,

    H. Baer, V. Barger, D. Sengupta and X. Tata, “Angular cuts to reduce the τ ¯τ jbackground to the higgsino signal at the LHC,” [arXiv:2203.03700 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  46. [53]

    Higgsino Dark Matter Confronts 14 Years of Fermi γ-Ray Data,

    C. Dessert, J. W. Foster, Y. Park, B. R. Safdi and W. L. Xu, “Higgsino Dark Matter Confronts 14 Years of Fermi γ-Ray Data,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, no.20, 201001 (2023) [arXiv:2207.10090 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Taking aim at the wino-Higgsino plane with the LHC,

    L. M. Carpenter, H. Gilmer, J. Kawamura and T. Murphy, “Taking aim at the wino-Higgsino plane with the LHC,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.1, 015012 (2024) [arXiv:2309.07213 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Radiative Corrections to Aid the Direct Detection of the Higgsino-like Neutralino Dark Matter: Spin-Independent Interactions,

    S. Bisal, A. Chatterjee, D. Das, S.A. Pasha, “Radiative Corrections to Aid the Direct Detection of the Higgsino-like Neutralino Dark Matter: Spin-Independent Interactions,” [arXiv:2311.09937 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  49. [56]

    Radiative corrections to the direct detection of the Higgsino-(and Wino-)like neutralino dark matter: Spin-dependent interactions,

    S. Bisal, A. Chatterjee, D. Das and S. A. Pasha, “Radiative corrections to the direct detection of the Higgsino-(and Wino-)like neutralino dark matter: Spin-dependent interactions,” [arXiv:2410.18205 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  50. [57]

    Precise estimate of charged Higgsino/Wino decay rate,

    M. Ibe, Y. Nakayama and S. Shirai, “Precise estimate of charged Higgsino/Wino decay rate,” JHEP 03, 012 (2024) [arXiv:2312.08087 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [58]

    CTA and SWGO can discover Higgsino dark matter annihi- lation,

    N. L. Rodd, B. R. Safdi and W. L. Xu, “CTA and SWGO can discover Higgsino dark matter annihi- lation,” Phys. Rev. D 110, no.4, 043003 (2024) [arXiv:2405.13104 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Search for annihilating dark matter in the Sun with 3 years of IceCube data,

    M. G. Aartsen et al. [IceCube], “Search for annihilating dark matter in the Sun with 3 years of IceCube data,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, no.3, 146 (2017) [erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 79, no.3, 214 (2019)] [arXiv:1612.05949 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2017 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Search for dark matter annihilations towards the inner Galactic halo from 10 years of observations with H.E.S.S.,

    H. Abdallah et al. [H.E.S.S.], “Search for dark matter annihilations towards the inner Galactic halo from 10 years of observations with H.E.S.S.,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, no.11, 111301 (2016) [arXiv:1607.08142 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2016 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Search for γ-Ray Line Signals from Dark Matter Annihilations in the Inner Galactic Halo from 10 Years of Observations with H.E.S.S.,

    H. Abdallah et al. [HESS], “Search for γ-Ray Line Signals from Dark Matter Annihilations in the Inner Galactic Halo from 10 Years of Observations with H.E.S.S.,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, no.20, 201101 (2018) [arXiv:1805.05741 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2018 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals in the H.E.S.S. Inner Galaxy Survey,

    H. Abdalla et al.[H.E.S.S.], “Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals in the H.E.S.S. Inner Galaxy Survey,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, no.11, 111101 (2022) [arXiv:2207.10471 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2022

  56. [63]

    Search for Gamma-Ray Emission from DES Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy Candidates with Fermi-LAT Data,

    A. Drlica-Wagner et al. [Fermi-LAT and DES], “Search for Gamma-Ray Emission from DES Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy Candidates with Fermi-LAT Data,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 809, no.1, L4 (2015) [arXiv:1503.02632 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2015 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with Six Years of Fermi Large Area Telescope Data,

    M. Ackermann et al. [Fermi-LAT], “Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with Six Years of Fermi Large Area Telescope Data,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115, no.23, 231301 (2015) [arXiv:1503.02641 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2015 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Limits to Dark Matter Annihilation Cross-Section from a Combined Analysis of MAGIC and Fermi-LAT Observations of Dwarf Satellite Galaxies,

    M. L. Ahnen et al.[MAGIC and Fermi-LAT], “Limits to Dark Matter Annihilation Cross-Section from a Combined Analysis of MAGIC and Fermi-LAT Observations of Dwarf Satellite Galaxies,” JCAP 02, 039 (2016) [arXiv:1601.06590 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2016 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation in Recently Discovered Milky Way Satellites with Fermi-LAT,

    A. Albert et al.[Fermi-LAT and DES], “Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation in Recently Discovered Milky Way Satellites with Fermi-LAT,” Astrophys. J. 834, no.2, 110 (2017) [arXiv:1611.03184 [astro- ph.HE]]

    2017 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array,

    B. S. Acharya et al. [CTA Consortium], “Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array,” [arXiv:1709.07997 [astro-ph.IM]]

    arXiv

  61. [68]

    Science Case for a Wide Field-of-View Very-High-Energy Gamma-Ray Observatory in the Southern Hemisphere,

    A. Albert, R. Alfaro, H. Ashkar, C. Alvarez, J. Alvarez, J. C. Arteaga-Vel´ azquez, H. A. Ayala Solares, R. Arceo, J. A. Bellido and S. BenZvi, et al.“Science Case for a Wide Field-of-View Very-High-Energy Gamma-Ray Observatory in the Southern Hemisphere,” [arXiv:1902.08429 [a...

    1902 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run,

    Y. Meng et al.[PandaX-4T], “Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, no.26, 261802 (2021) [arXiv:2107.13438 [hep-ex]]

    2021 arXiv

  63. [70]

    First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,

    E. Aprile et al. [XENON], “First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, no.4, 041003 (2023) [arXiv:2303.14729 [hep-ex]]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [71]

    First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,

    J. Aalbers et al. [LZ], “First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, no.4, 041002 (2023) [arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex]]

    2023 arXiv

  65. [72]

    Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne ·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T,

    Z. Bo et al. [PandaX], “Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne ·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T,” [arXiv:2408.00664 [hep-ex]]. 23

    arXiv

  66. [73]

    Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,

    J. Aalbers et al. [LZ Collaboration], “Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” [arXiv:2410.17036 [hep-ex]]

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments,

    J. Billard, L. Strigari and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, “Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments,” Phys. Rev. D 89, no.2, 023524 (2014) [arXiv:1307.5458 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  68. [76]

    New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches,

    C. A. J. O’Hare, “New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, no.25, 251802 (2021) [arXiv:2109.03116 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  69. [77]

    A Supersymmetry primer,

    S. P. Martin, “A Supersymmetry primer,” [arXiv:hep-ph/9709356 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  70. [78]

    An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment,

    T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, T. Wright, W. B. Cairncross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang and J. Ye, et al.“An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment,” Science 381, no.6653, adg4084 (2023) [arXiv:2212.11841 [physics.atom-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Interpreting the Electron EDM Constraint,

    C. Cesarotti, Q. Lu, Y. Nakai, A. Parikh and M. Reece, “Interpreting the Electron EDM Constraint,” JHEP 05, 059 (2019) [arXiv:1810.07736 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Prospects and Blind Spots for Neutralino Dark Matter,

    C. Cheung, L. J. Hall, D. Pinner and J. T. Ruderman, “Prospects and Blind Spots for Neutralino Dark Matter,” JHEP 05, 100 (2013) [arXiv:1211.4873 [hep-ph]]

    2013 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Upper bound of the lightest neutral Higgs mass in extended supersymmetric Standard Models,

    T. Moroi and Y. Okada, “Upper bound of the lightest neutral Higgs mass in extended supersymmetric Standard Models,” Phys. Lett. B 295, 73-78 (1992) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90091-H

    1992 doi

  74. [82]

    Radiative corrections to Higgs masses in the supersymmetric model with an extra family and antifamily,

    T. Moroi and Y. Okada, “Radiative corrections to Higgs masses in the supersymmetric model with an extra family and antifamily,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 7, 187-200 (1992) doi:10.1142/S0217732392000124

    1992 doi

  75. [83]

    Perturbative unification and Higgs boson mass bounds,

    K.S. Babu, I. Gogoladze and C. Kolda, “Perturbative unification and Higgs boson mass bounds,” [arXiv:hep-ph/0410085]

    arXiv

  76. [84]

    Higgs Boson Mass, Sparticle Spectrum and Little Hierarchy Problem in Extended MSSM,

    K.S. Babu, I. Gogoladze, M.U. Rehman and Q. Shafi, “Higgs Boson Mass, Sparticle Spectrum and Little Hierarchy Problem in Extended MSSM,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 055017 (2008) [arXiv:0807.3055 [hep-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Extra vector-like matter and the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in low-energy super- symmetry,

    S. P. Martin, “Extra vector-like matter and the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in low-energy super- symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 035004 (2010) [arXiv:0910.2732 [hep-ph]]

    2010 arXiv

  78. [86]

    A Little Solution to the Little Hierarchy Problem: A Vector-like Generation,

    P. W. Graham, A. Ismail, S. Rajendran and P. Saraswat, “A Little Solution to the Little Hierarchy Problem: A Vector-like Generation,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 055016 (2010) [arXiv:0910.3020 [hep-ph]]

    2010 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Reevaluation of the elastic scattering of supersymmetric dark matter,

    J. R. Ellis, A. Ferstl and K. A. Olive, “Reevaluation of the elastic scattering of supersymmetric dark matter,” Phys. Lett. B 481, 304-314 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0001005 [hep-ph]]

    2000 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Direct detection of dark matter in supersymmetric models,

    H. Baer, C. Balazs, A. Belyaev and J. O’Farrill, “Direct detection of dark matter in supersymmetric models,” JCAP 09, 007 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0305191 [hep-ph]]

    2003 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Target dark matter detection rates in models with a well-tempered neutralino,

    H. Baer, A. Mustafayev, E. K. Park and X. Tata, “Target dark matter detection rates in models with a well-tempered neutralino,” JCAP 01, 017 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0611387 [hep-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Blind Spots for neutralino Dark Matter in the MSSM with an intermediate mA,

    P. Huang and C. E. M. Wagner, “Blind Spots for neutralino Dark Matter in the MSSM with an intermediate mA,” Phys. Rev. D 90, no.1, 015018 (2014) [arXiv:1404.0392 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Lighting up the LHC with Dark Matter,

    S. Baum, M. Carena, T. Ou, D. Rocha, N. R. Shah and C. E. M. Wagner, “Lighting up the LHC with Dark Matter,” JHEP 11, 037 (2023) [arXiv:2303.01523 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Machine-Learning Analysis of Radiative Decays to Dark Matter at the LHC,

    E. Arganda, M. Carena, M. de los Rios, A. D. Perez, D. Rocha, R. M. Sand´ a Seoane and C. E. M. Wag- ner, “Machine-Learning Analysis of Radiative Decays to Dark Matter at the LHC,” [arXiv:2410.13799 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  85. [93]

    SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra,

    B. C. Allanach, “SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 143, 305-331 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0104145]

    2002 arXiv

  86. [94]

    MicrOMEGAs: A Program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM,

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, “MicrOMEGAs: A Program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM,” Comput. Phys. Commun.149, 103-120 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0112278]

    2002 arXiv

  87. [95]

    micrOMEGAs: Version 1.3,

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, “micrOMEGAs: Version 1.3,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 174, 577-604 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0405253]

    2006 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Recasting direct detection limits within micrOMEGAs and implication for non-standard Dark Matter scenarios,

    G. Belanger, A. Mjallal and A. Pukhov, “Recasting direct detection limits within micrOMEGAs and implication for non-standard Dark Matter scenarios,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81, no.3, 239 (2021) [arXiv:2003.08621 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  89. [97]

    micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter,

    G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml, A. Mjallal and A. Pukhov, “micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 299, 109133 24 (2024) [arXiv:2312.14894 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  90. [98]

    DarkSUSY: Computing supersymmetric dark matter properties numerically,

    P. Gondolo, J. Edsjo, P. Ullio, L. Bergstrom, M. Schelke and E. A. Baltz, “DarkSUSY: Computing supersymmetric dark matter properties numerically,” JCAP 07, 008 (2004) [arXiv:astro-ph/0406204 [astro-ph]]

    2004 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Precision predictions for dark matter with DM@NLO in the MSSM,

    J. Harz, B. Herrmann, M. Klasen, K. Kovaˇ r ´ ık and L. P. Wiggering, “Precision predictions for dark matter with DM@NLO in the MSSM,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84, no.4, 342 (2024) [arXiv:2312.17206 [hep- ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Out of this world supersymmetry breaking,

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “Out of this world supersymmetry breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B 557, 79-118 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9810155]

    1999 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Gaugino mass without singlets,

    G. F. Giudice, M. A. Luty, H. Murayama and R. Rattazzi, “Gaugino mass without singlets,” JHEP 12, 027 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9810442]

    1998 arXiv

  94. [102]

    The XLZD Design Book: Towards the Next-Generation Liquid Xenon Observatory for Dark Matter and Neutrino Physics,

    J. Aalbers et al. [XLZD], “The XLZD Design Book: Towards the Next-Generation Liquid Xenon Observatory for Dark Matter and Neutrino Physics,” [arXiv:2410.17137 [hep-ex]]

  95. [103]

    Search for Nearly Mass-Degenerate Higgsinos Using Low-Momentum Mildly Displaced Tracks in pp Collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector,

    G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], “Search for Nearly Mass-Degenerate Higgsinos Using Low-Momentum Mildly Displaced Tracks in pp Collisions at s=13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, no.22, 221801 (2024) [arXiv:2401.14046 [hep-ex]]

    2024 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature using 136 fb −1 of pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,

    G. Aad et al.[ATLAS], “Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature using 136 fb −1 of pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no.7, 606 (2022) [arXiv:2201.02472 [hep-ex]]

    2022 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Search for supersymmetry in final states with disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV,

    A. Hayrapetyan et al. [CMS], “Search for supersymmetry in final states with disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.7, 072007 (2024) [arXiv:2309.16823 [hep-ex]]

    2024 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Search for chargino–neutralino pair production in final states with three leptons and missing transverse momentum in √s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector,

    G. Aad et al. [ATLAS], “Search for chargino–neutralino pair production in final states with three leptons and missing transverse momentum in √s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81, no.12, 1118 (2021) [arXiv:2106.01676 [hep-ex]]

    2021 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Combined search for electroweak production of winos, binos, higgsinos, and sleptons in proton- proton collisions at sqrts = 13 TeV,

    [CMS], “Combined search for electroweak production of winos, binos, higgsinos, and sleptons in proton- proton collisions at sqrts = 13 TeV,” CMS-PAS-SUS-21-008

  100. [108]

    Search for supersymmetry in final states with two or three soft leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV,

    A. Tumasyan et al. [CMS], “Search for supersymmetry in final states with two or three soft leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV,” JHEP 04, 091 (2022) [arXiv:2111.06296 [hep-ex]]

    2022 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Monojets reveal overlapping excesses for light compressed higgsinos,

    D. Agin, B. Fuks, M. D. Goodsell and T. Murphy, “Monojets reveal overlapping excesses for light compressed higgsinos,” [arXiv:2311.17149 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  102. [110]

    Consistent Excesses in the Search for ˜χ0 2 ˜χ± 1 : Wino/bino vs. Higgsino Dark Matter,

    M. Chakraborti, S. Heinemeyer and I. Saha, “Consistent Excesses in the Search for ˜χ0 2 ˜χ± 1 : Wino/bino vs. Higgsino Dark Matter,” [arXiv:2403.14759 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  103. [111]

    Seeking a coherent explanation of LHC excesses for compressed spectra,

    D. Agin, B. Fuks, M. D. Goodsell and T. Murphy, “Seeking a coherent explanation of LHC excesses for compressed spectra,” [arXiv:2404.12423 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  104. [112]

    ATLAS sensitivity to winos and higgsinos with a highly compressed mass spectrum at the HL-LHC,

    [ATLAS], “ATLAS sensitivity to winos and higgsinos with a highly compressed mass spectrum at the HL-LHC,” ATL-PHYS-PUB-2018-031, https://cds.cern.ch/record/2647294

    2018

  105. [113]

    Discovery reach for wino and higgsino dark matter with a disappearing track signature at a 100 TeV pp collider,

    M. Saito, R. Sawada, K. Terashi and S. Asai, “Discovery reach for wino and higgsino dark matter with a disappearing track signature at a 100 TeV pp collider,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, no.6, 469 (2019) [arXiv:1901.02987 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Hunting wino and higgsino dark matter at the muon collider with disappearing tracks,

    R. Capdevilla, F. Meloni, R. Simoniello and J. Zurita, “Hunting wino and higgsino dark matter at the muon collider with disappearing tracks,” JHEP 06, 133 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)133 [arXiv:2102.11292 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  107. [115]

    WIMPs at High Energy Muon Colliders,

    T. Han, Z. Liu, L. T. Wang and X. Wang, “WIMPs at High Energy Muon Colliders,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.7, 075004 (2021) [arXiv:2009.11287 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  108. [116]

    WIMP Dark Matter at High Energy Muon Colliders −A White Paper for Snowmass 2021,

    T. Han, Z. Liu, L. T. Wang and X. Wang, “WIMP Dark Matter at High Energy Muon Colliders −A White Paper for Snowmass 2021,” [arXiv:2203.07351 [hep-ph]]

    2021 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Discovering Electroweak Interacting Dark Matter at Muon Colliders using Soft Tracks,

    R. Capdevilla, F. Meloni and J. Zurita, “Discovering Electroweak Interacting Dark Matter at Muon Colliders using Soft Tracks,” [arXiv:2405.08858 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.