Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 149 references

Revisiting Universal Extra-Dimension Model with Gravity Mediated Decays

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Recast LHC searches already push the fat-brane mUED scale above about 3 TeV, and the paper projects that BDT-based searches could reach about 3.4 TeV.

desk verdict A solid, well-validated recast of LHC searches onto fat-brane mUED with new BDT-tagged projections, but the gravity-mediated width calculation is the linchpin and needs scrutiny before the bounds are taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09344 v1 pith:QITE6BUE submitted 2024-12-12 hep-ph

Kirtiman Ghosh , Katri Huitu , Rameswar Sahu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords universalextradimensionsfatbranegravity-mediateddecaysKaluza-KleingravitontowerLHCrecastingmono-photonplusMETboostedbosontaggingmissingtransverseenergy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper targets the fat-brane version of the minimal Universal Extra Dimension model (FB-mUED), in which Standard Model fields live on a TeV-sized fifth dimension while gravity also fills additional large dimensions. Because each Kaluza-Klein (KK) excitation can decay into a whole tower of graviton modes, KK particles produce hard photons, jets, and boosted $W/Z/H$ bosons or top quarks together with large missing transverse energy. The paper recasts three 13 TeV LHC searches for these final states and finds that the multijet channel alone excludes $R^{-1}$ below about 2975 GeV for $N=2$ large extra dimensions, with complementary mono-photon and di-photon bounds for $N=4$ and $N=6$. It then designs five BDT-based signal regions that tag boosted bosons and projects that $500\ \mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ would extend the 95% C.L. reach to roughly 3320 GeV ($N=2$) and up to about 3390 GeV ($N=6$). If these projections hold, the model is already pressed to multi-TeV radii and future LHC runs could probe even higher scales.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the gravity-mediated decay width, computed by replacing the sum over the tower of Kaluza-Klein graviton modes by an integral over the graviton density of states, $\Gamma = (M_{Pl}^2/M_D^{N+2}) \int dm\, d\Omega\, \Gamma_{\vec n}\, m_{\vec n}^{N-1}$ (Eq.~3.2). This replacement makes the otherwise Planck-suppressed single-mode widths sizable, because each KK state can decay into many kinematically allowed graviton modes, and it sets the relative strength of GMD versus KK-number-conserving decays that fixes every final state. For the future projections, the second central object is a boosted decision tree (BDT) classifier trained on fat-jet substructure variables (invariant mass, N-subjettiness, jet charge, b-tag) to tag $W/Z$ and top jets against QCD jets, which suppresses the dominant backgrounds in the five proposed signal regions.

What would settle it

Recompute the level-1 KK-gluon gravity-mediated width by explicitly summing over the graviton tower for $N=2,4,6$ at, say, $R^{-1}=3$ TeV and $M_D=5$ TeV, and compare with the density-of-states integral of Eq.~(3.2); a deviation larger than the Monte-Carlo statistical uncertainty would change the branching ratios and therefore the recast bounds such as $R^{-1}<2975$ GeV for $N=2$. A dedicated search with the proposed five signal regions at $500\ \mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ would also settle whether the predicted event rates appear.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the fat-brane mUED parameter space is strongly constrained by existing LHC searches originally designed for supersymmetry, once those searches are recast with gravity-mediated decays. The key finding is scenario-dependent: for $N=2$ the large graviton density of states makes gravity-mediated decay dominate, so the multi-jet plus missing-energy search gives the best bound, excluding $R^{-1}<2975$ GeV independently of $M_D$; for $N=4$ the multijet and mono-photon searches are complementary, excluding $R^{-1}$ below about 2898 GeV ($M_D=5$ TeV) and 2958 GeV ($M_D=15$ TeV); for $N=6$, where KK-number-conserving cascades dominate, the di-photon channel is most sensitive, with an expected reach near 3000 GeV at $139\ \mathrm{fb}^{-1}$. The paper further claims that its own five signal regions with BDT-based boosted-boson tagging would, at $500\ \mathrm{fb}^{-1}$, improve the $N=2$ reach to about 3320 GeV and reach about 3390 GeV for $N=6$ at high $M_D$.

Load-bearing premise

Every bound and projection inherits the gravity-mediated decay widths, computed by replacing the sum over the graviton tower with an integral over the graviton density of states (Eq.~3.2) and implemented in a modified shower routine; the paper validates the di-photon implementation against an earlier recast but does not separately verify the mono-photon and multijet implementations, so an error there would shift all quoted limits and reaches.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Existing LHC photon-plus-MET, di-photon-plus-MET, and multijet-plus-MET searches, recast model-independently, already exclude fat-brane mUED level-1 KK gluon and photon masses below roughly 3 TeV for all $N=2,4,6$.
  • For $N=2$, the multijet channel dominates and further luminosity mainly extends the jet-based reach; the reach is nearly independent of $M_D$.
  • For $N=4$ and $N=6$, the mono-photon and di-photon channels become the most sensitive at high $M_D$, so the constraints are genuinely two-dimensional in the $R^{-1}$--$M_D$ plane.
  • The proposed BDT signal regions, combined statistically, project $500\ \mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ 95% C.L. reaches of about 3320 GeV for $N=2$ and up to about 3390 GeV for $N=6$, roughly 345 GeV beyond the current $N=2$ bound.
  • Boosted boson tagging and lepton-inclusive signal regions recover signal that SUSY-tailored cuts reject, so the model's reach is not limited by the existing search optimizations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same recasting method could be applied to the corresponding search channels from the other large LHC detector; using both detectors' data would tighten or independently cross-check these bounds.
  • Because the graviton tower makes the photon $p_T$ spectrum softer than in gauge-mediated supersymmetry, future experimental signal regions may do better with lower photon $p_T$ thresholds combined with higher missing-energy requirements than with the SUSY-oriented cuts.
  • Before quoting the $N=6$ projection, the discrepancy between the roughly 3390 GeV reach stated in Section 3.5.3 and the roughly 3225 GeV value in Section 4 should be resolved; the final limit line could move by several hundred GeV.
  • The BDT taggers could be validated on Standard Model $W/Z$+jets data at 13 TeV before being used in a new physics search, which would test tagger performance independently of the model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the collider phenomenology of the fat-brane realization of minimal Universal Extra Dimensions (mUED), in which gravity-mediated decays (GMD) of level-1 KK particles produce final states with photons, jets, massive bosons, and missing transverse energy. It recasts ATLAS mono-photon (139 fb^-1), multijet (139 fb^-1), and diphoton (36.1 fb^-1, extrapolated to 139 fb^-1) searches to derive 95% CL exclusion limits on the R^-1--MD plane for N = 2, 4, 6, and it proposes BDT-based search strategies with fat-jet tagging for 500 fb^-1 of future LHC data. The main quantitative claims are that the N = 2 multijet search excludes R^-1 below about 2975 GeV, the N = 6 diphoton reach reaches about 3000 GeV at MD = 15 TeV, and the proposed optimized analyses extend the reach to about 3320 GeV (N = 2), 3190 GeV (N = 4), and 3390 GeV (N = 6) at 500 fb^-1.

Significance. If the GMD width calculation is correct, the paper provides a useful and reasonably complete update of the LHC constraints on this specific extra-dimensional scenario. It has genuine strengths: the mono-photon recasting is validated against ATLAS HEPData cut-flow tables (Tables 3, 8, 9), the bounds are anchored to official 95% CL visible cross-section limits, and the object and signal-region definitions are documented in enough detail for the analysis to be reproduced. The future projections with fat-jet tagging and BDT classifiers are a constructive addition. However, because every quoted exclusion and projection is proportional to the GMD width, the lack of a derivation for the density-of-states integral and the apparent typo in the form-factor definition are load-bearing issues that must be addressed before the numerical results can be fully trusted.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (3.2)] The replacement of the graviton KK sum by the integral Gamma = (M_Pl^2/M_D^{N+2}) integral dm dOmega Gamma_n m^{N-1} assumes a density of states m^{N-1} for the tower of large extra dimensions. In the fat-brane setup described in Section 2.1, gravity also propagates in the TeV^-1 universal dimension, and the form factors in Eq. (A.2) depend explicitly on n5. No derivation is given showing that the sum over n5 and the N large dimensions collapses to this simple integral, and for N = 6, where Fig. 1 shows the spectrum peaking at large graviton masses, threshold and Jacobian effects could alter the result by O(1). Since every quoted bound and projection is proportional to this width, please provide the derivation or justify the approximation explicitly.
  2. [Appendix A.1, Eq. (A.2)] The printed relation |F^s_{l|n}|^2 = |F^s_{l|n}|^2 / x5^2 is self-referential and cannot be implemented as written; presumably |F^s|^2 = |F^c|^2/x5^2 or an equivalent corrected expression was intended. Please state the exact form factors used in the modified PYWIDTH routine and confirm that the numerical results are stable under the correction.
  3. [Section 3.4.3 and Table 4] The 139 fb^-1 diphoton limits are not ATLAS results but an extrapolation of the 36.1 fb^-1 analysis assuming an overall 40% background uncertainty. This extrapolated limit is used in Fig. 5 and is the strongest constraint for N = 6 at large MD (R^-1 around 3000 GeV). The paper should present the sensitivity of this bound to the assumed uncertainty and clearly label the diphoton contours as expected limits rather than observed constraints.
  4. [Sections 3.5.1 and Appendix A.3] The BDT V-tagger is trained on WW/ZZ and dijet samples and then applied to signal fat jets from KK cascade decays without demonstrating that the tagging efficiency transfers. Because the V-tagged jet multiplicity is a key input to the projections in Figs. 12-15, please report the signal-side tagging rate as a function of R^-1 and MD, or provide a mixed-signal validation, and quantify the resulting systematic uncertainty.
  5. [Section 3.4.2] The multijet recast is not validated with a cut-flow table in this work but is inherited from Ref. [18], which uses the same GMD implementation. The N = 2 exclusion (R^-1 below 2975 GeV) rests entirely on this channel, so a cross-check of the multijet signal-region efficiencies against an external implementation, or at least a cut-flow table analogous to Tables 3, 8 and 9, is needed to support the central bound.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains the typo "139 inverse femtobern"; it should read "139 inverse femtobarns".
  2. [Fig. 15 caption] The caption labels the upper right panel as "N = 2", but from the text and the surrounding panels it should be "N = 4".
  3. [Section 2.1, Eqs. (2.1) and (2.7)] The KK decomposition of the graviton uses the index n5 for the small dimension but writes the exponential and the mass formula with the large-dimension radius r; the distinction between R and r should be clarified to avoid ambiguity about which radius controls the n5 mode mass.
  4. [Table 7 and Section 3.5.2] The signal region is referred to as SR_0pnl in the table header but as SR_0p0l and SR_0pnj elsewhere; please make the naming consistent.
  5. [Appendix A.3, Eq. (A.4)] The invariant mass formula is written as M = sqrt(sum_i E_i^2 - sum_i p_i^2); the correct jet invariant mass is sqrt((sum_i E_i)^2 - (sum_i p_i)^2). Please correct this.
  6. [Section 3.5.3 and Section 4] The numbers quoted for the N = 4 future reach are inconsistent: Section 3.5.3 states 3190 GeV at MD around 14 TeV, while Section 4 reports 2942(3157) GeV for MD = 5000(15000) GeV; please align the text and figures.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the constraints are anchored to external ATLAS data and published gravity-mediated decay widths.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: model definition -> production/decay simulation -> ATLAS object and signal-region selections -> 95% CL visible cross-section limits -> bounds on (R^-1, M_D). Each load-bearing step is anchored externally: ATLAS Refs. [1-3] supply the observed cross-section limits and cut-flow tables; the GMD widths are taken from the published formulas in Refs. [94,96]; the Pythia8 implementation is a code-level modification rather than a fit to the quoted limits; and the mono-photon implementation is validated against ATLAS HEPData cut-flow tables (Table 3). The only self-referential elements are Eq. (3.2), attributed to Ref. [100] (Ghosh & Huitu, overlapping authors), and the diphoton validation against Ref. [18] (also involving K. Ghosh). Neither reduces the central claim to its inputs. Eq. (3.2) is the standard replacement of the graviton KK-tower sum by a density-of-states integral and is independently checkable, while the Ref. [18] reproduction is a consistency check of the recast setup and not the origin of the ATLAS limits. The apparent typo in Eq. (A.2), where |F^s_{l|n}|^2 is set equal to itself divided by x_5^2, is an internal consistency defect that would affect correctness if propagated, but it is not a circular derivation: no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no conclusion is equivalent to an assumption by construction. Verdict: no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or forces are introduced; the model is from prior literature. The hand-set inputs that matter are the cutoff product Lambda R = 5 and the two assumed background uncertainties, which directly affect the mass spectrum and the projected sensitivities. The model parameters R^-1 and MD are scanned, not fitted.

free parameters (3)
  • Lambda R product (cutoff scale times inverse radius) = 5
    Chosen by hand; sets the radiative mass corrections and hence the mass spectrum and branching ratios for all KK particles (Section 3.1 and throughout).
  • Assumed background uncertainty for diphoton 139 fb^-1 extrapolation = 40%
    Adopted as 'conservative' to compute expected limits via asymptotic formulae (Section 3.4.3).
  • Assumed background uncertainty for future projections = 20%
    Assumed overall statistical plus systematic uncertainty for BDT-based projections (Section 3.5.3).
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The fat-brane mUED model with gravity-matter interactions (Sections 2-2.1) is a valid effective field theory.
    The paper treats this model, built in Refs. [54-62], as the framework for all phenomenology without deriving it from a more fundamental theory.
  • domain assumption The gravity-mediated decay widths from Refs. [94,96] summarized in Appendix A.1 are correct.
    All branching ratios and exclusion bounds depend on these widths; they are taken from the literature rather than rederived.
  • domain assumption The sum over the graviton tower can be replaced by an integral over the density of states (Eq. 3.2, Section 3.2).
    The density-of-states approximation is used to compute total GMD widths and the kinematics of the emitted graviton modes.
  • domain assumption ATLAS model-independent 95% CL upper limits on visible cross-sections can be applied to this model after recasting with identical object definitions and selections.
    The bounds are derived by comparing simulated signal yields to ATLAS published limits, assuming the signal regions are valid for this model.
  • ad hoc to paper The expected diphoton limits at 139 fb^-1 can be obtained by scaling the 36.1 fb^-1 result with the asymptotic formula assuming 40% background uncertainty.
    This is an extrapolation, not a real search; the assumed uncertainty is chosen by the authors (Section 3.4.3).
  • ad hoc to paper The BDT V-tagging classifier trained on generic W/Z and QCD jets retains its tagging efficiency when applied to signal fat jets from KK decays.
    The signal jets are assumed to have substructure similar to the training samples; this is not explicitly validated (Section 3.5.1, Appendix A.3).
  • ad hoc to paper The assumed 20% background uncertainty used in the projection significances approximates the true total uncertainty.
    The authors state that detailed background uncertainty estimation is beyond scope and adopt 20% (Section 3.5.3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Revisiting Universal Extra-Dimension Model with Gravity Mediated Decays." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QITE6BUE

@misc{pith2026241209344,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Revisiting Universal Extra-Dimension Model with Gravity Mediated Decays},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QITE6BUE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09344}
}
read the original abstract

We explore the collider phenomenology of the fat-brane realization of the Minimal Universal Extra Dimension (mUED) model, where Standard Model (SM) fields propagate in a small extra dimension while gravity accesses additional large extra dimensions. This configuration allows for gravity-mediated decay (GMD) of Kaluza-Klein (KK) particles, resulting in unique final states with hard photons, jets, massive SM bosons, and large missing transverse energy due to invisible KK gravitons. We derive updated constraints on the model's parameter space by recasting ATLAS mono-photon, di-photon, and multi-jet search results using 139 inverse femtobern of integrated luminosity data. Recognizing that current LHC search strategies are tailored for supersymmetric scenarios and may not fully capture the distinct signatures, we propose optimized strategies using machine learning algorithms to tag boosted SM bosons and enhance signal discrimination against SM backgrounds. These methods improve sensitivity to fat-brane mUED signatures and offer promising prospects for probing this model in future LHC runs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

149 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [18]

    Ghosh, D

    K. Ghosh, D. Karabacak, and S. Nandi,Universal Extra Dimension models with gravity mediated decays after LHC Run II data, Phys. Lett. B788 (2019) 388–395, [arXiv:1805.11124]

    arXiv 2019

  2. [1]

    A TLASCollaboration, Search for new phenomena in final states with photons, jets and missing transverse momentum inpp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, arXiv:2206.06012

    arXiv

  3. [2]

    A TLASCollaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 139 fb−1 of √s =13 TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2019-040, 8, 2019

    2019

  4. [3]

    Aaboud et al.,Search for photonic signatures of gauge-mediated supersymmetry in 13 TeVpp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    A TLASCollaboration, M. Aaboud et al.,Search for photonic signatures of gauge-mediated supersymmetry in 13 TeVpp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018), no. 9 092006, [arXiv:1802.03158]. – 38 –

    arXiv 2018

  5. [4]

    Arkani-Hamed, S

    N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali,The Hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter, Phys. Lett. B429 (1998) 263–272, [hep-ph/9803315]

    arXiv 1998

  6. [5]

    Antoniadis,A Possible new dimension at a few TeV, Phys

    I. Antoniadis,A Possible new dimension at a few TeV, Phys. Lett. B246 (1990) 377–384

    1990

  7. [6]

    Antoniadis, N

    I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali,New dimensions at a millimeter to a Fermi and superstrings at a TeV, Phys. Lett. B436 (1998) 257–263, [hep-ph/9804398]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [7]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 3370–3373, [hep-ph/9905221]

    arXiv 1999

Show all 149 references
  1. [8]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,An Alternative to compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 4690–4693, [hep-th/9906064]

    1999 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Appelquist, H.-C

    T. Appelquist, H.-C. Cheng, and B. A. Dobrescu,Bounds on universal extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 035002, [hep-ph/0012100]

    2001 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Servant and T

    G. Servant and T. M. P. Tait,Is the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle a viable dark matter candidate?, Nucl. Phys. B650 (2003) 391–419, [hep-ph/0206071]

    2003 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Kong and K

    K. Kong and K. T. Matchev,Precise calculation of the relic density of Kaluza-Klein dark matter in universal extra dimensions, JHEP 01 (2006) 038, [hep-ph/0509119]

    2006 arXiv

  5. [12]

    B. A. Dobrescu, D. Hooper, K. Kong, and R. Mahbubani,Spinless photon dark matter from two universal extra dimensions, JCAP 10 (2007) 012, [arXiv:0706.3409]

    2007 arXiv

  6. [13]

    B. A. Dobrescu and E. Poppitz,Number of fermion generations derived from anomaly cancellation, Phys. Rev. Lett.87 (2001) 031801, [hep-ph/0102010]

    2001 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Appelquist, B

    T. Appelquist, B. A. Dobrescu, E. Ponton, and H.-U. Yee,Proton stability in six-dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.87 (2001) 181802, [hep-ph/0107056]

    2001 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Belyaev, M

    A. Belyaev, M. Brown, J. Moreno, and C. Papineau,Discovering Minimal Universal Extra Dimensions (MUED) at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2013) 080, [arXiv:1212.4858]

    2013 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Kakuda, K

    T. Kakuda, K. Nishiwaki, K.-y. Oda, and R. Watanabe,Universal extra dimensions after Higgs discovery, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 035007, [arXiv:1305.1686]

    2013 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Belanger, A

    G. Belanger, A. Belyaev, M. Brown, M. Kakizaki, and A. Pukhov,Testing Minimal Universal Extra Dimensions Using Higgs Boson Searches at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013), no. 1 016008, [arXiv:1207.0798]

    2013 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Ghosh and A

    K. Ghosh and A. Datta,Probing two Universal Extra Dimensions at International Linear Collider, Phys. Lett. B665 (2008) 369–373, [arXiv:0802.2162]

    2008 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Ghosh and A

    K. Ghosh and A. Datta,Phenomenology of spinless adjoints in two Universal Extra Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B800 (2008) 109–126, [arXiv:0801.0943]

    2008 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Beuria, A

    J. Beuria, A. Datta, D. Debnath, and K. T. Matchev,LHC Collider Phenomenology of Minimal Universal Extra Dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun.226 (2018) 187–205, [arXiv:1702.00413]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    U. K. Dey and A. Raychaudhuri,KK-number non-conserving decays: Signal ofn = 2 excitations of extra-dimensional models at the LHC, Nucl. Phys. B893 (2015) 408–419, [arXiv:1410.1463]. – 39 –

    2015 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Edelhäuser, T

    L. Edelhäuser, T. Flacke, and M. Krämer,Constraints on models with universal extra dimensions from dilepton searches at the LHC, JHEP 08 (2013) 091, [arXiv:1302.6076]

    2013 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Flacke, A

    T. Flacke, A. Menon, and Z. Sullivan,Constraints on UED from W’ searches, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 093006, [arXiv:1207.4472]

    2012 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Huang, K

    G.-Y. Huang, K. Kong, and S. C. Park,Bounds on the Fermion-Bulk Masses in Models with Universal Extra Dimensions, JHEP 06 (2012) 099, [arXiv:1204.0522]

    2012 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Flacke and C

    T. Flacke and C. Pasold,Constraints on split-UED from Electroweak Precision Tests, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 126007, [arXiv:1111.7250]

    2012 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Nishiwaki, K.-y

    K. Nishiwaki, K.-y. Oda, N. Okuda, and R. Watanabe,Heavy Higgs at Tevatron and LHC in Universal Extra Dimension Models, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 035026, [arXiv:1108.1765]

    2012 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Murayama, M

    H. Murayama, M. M. Nojiri, and K. Tobioka,Improved discovery of a nearly degenerate model: MUED using MT2 at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 094015, [arXiv:1107.3369]

    2011 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Choudhury, A

    D. Choudhury, A. Datta, D. K. Ghosh, and K. Ghosh,Exploring two Universal Extra Dimensions at the CERN LHC, JHEP 04 (2012) 057, [arXiv:1109.1400]

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Ghosh, S

    K. Ghosh, S. Mukhopadhyay, and B. Mukhopadhyaya,Discrimination of low missing energy look-alikes at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2010) 096, [arXiv:1007.4012]

    2010 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Bhattacherjee and K

    B. Bhattacherjee and K. Ghosh,Search for the minimal universal extra dimension model at the LHC with√s=7 TeV, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 034003, [arXiv:1006.3043]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bertone, K

    G. Bertone, K. Kong, R. Ruiz de Austri, and R. Trotta,Global fits of the Minimal Universal Extra Dimensions scenario, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 036008, [arXiv:1010.2023]

    2011 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Freitas and K

    A. Freitas and K. Kong,Two universal extra dimensions and spinless photons at the ILC, JHEP 02 (2008) 068, [arXiv:0711.4124]

    2008 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Macesanu, C

    C. Macesanu, C. D. McMullen, and S. Nandi,Collider implications of universal extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 015009, [hep-ph/0201300]

    2002 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Ghosh and K

    K. Ghosh and K. Huitu,Constraints on Universal Extra Dimension models with gravity mediated decays from ATLAS diphoton search, JHEP 06 (2012) 042, [arXiv:1203.1551]

    2012 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Choudhury, A

    D. Choudhury, A. Datta, and K. Ghosh,Deciphering Universal Extra Dimension from the top quark signals at the CERN LHC, JHEP 08 (2010) 051, [arXiv:0911.4064]

    2010 arXiv

  29. [37]

    T. G. Rizzo,Probes of universal extra dimensions at colliders, Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 095010, [hep-ph/0106336]

    2001 arXiv

  30. [38]

    A. Muck, A. Pilaftsis, and R. Ruckl,Probing minimal 5-D extensions of the standard model: From LEP to an e+ e- linear collider, Nucl. Phys. B687 (2004) 55–75, [hep-ph/0312186]

    2004 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Bhattacharyya, P

    G. Bhattacharyya, P. Dey, A. Kundu, and A. Raychaudhuri,Probing universal extra dimension at the international linear collider, Phys. Lett. B628 (2005) 141–147, [hep-ph/0502031]

    2005 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Battaglia, A

    M. Battaglia, A. Datta, A. De Roeck, K. Kong, and K. T. Matchev,Contrasting supersymmetry and universal extra dimensions at the clic multi-TeV e+ e- collider, JHEP 07 (2005) 033, [hep-ph/0502041]

    2005 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Bhattacherjee and A

    B. Bhattacherjee and A. Kundu,The International linear collider as a Kaluza-Klein factory, Phys. Lett. B627 (2005) 137–144, [hep-ph/0508170]. – 40 –

    2005 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Datta, K

    A. Datta, K. Kong, and K. T. Matchev,Discrimination of supersymmetry and universal extra dimensions at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 096006, [hep-ph/0509246]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 72, 119901 (2005)]

    2005 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Datta, G

    A. Datta, G. L. Kane, and M. Toharia,Is it SUSY?, hep-ph/0510204

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Khachatryan et al.,Search for dark matter, extra dimensions, and unparticles in monojet events in proton–proton collisions at√s = 8 TeV, Eur

    CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al.,Search for dark matter, extra dimensions, and unparticles in monojet events in proton–proton collisions at√s = 8 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015), no. 5 235, [arXiv:1408.3583]

    2015 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Datta, U

    A. Datta, U. K. Dey, A. Raychaudhuri, and A. Shaw,Boundary Localized Terms in Universal Extra-Dimensional Models through a Dark Matter perspective, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 016011, [arXiv:1305.4507]

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Flacke, D

    T. Flacke, D. W. Kang, K. Kong, G. Mohlabeng, and S. C. Park,Electroweak Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter, JHEP 04 (2017) 041, [arXiv:1702.02949]

    2017 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Ghosh, T

    Avnish, K. Ghosh, T. Jha, and S. Niyogi,Minimal and non-minimal Universal Extra Dimension models in the light of LHC data at 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 115011, [arXiv:2012.15137]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Flacke, A

    T. Flacke, A. Menon, and D. J. Phalen,Non-minimal universal extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 056009, [arXiv:0811.1598]

    2009 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Datta, K

    A. Datta, K. Nishiwaki, and S. Niyogi,Non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensions: The Strongly Interacting Sector at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 11 (2012) 154, [arXiv:1206.3987]

    2012 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Flacke, K

    T. Flacke, K. Kong, and S. C. Park,126 GeV Higgs in Next-to-Minimal Universal Extra Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B728 (2014) 262–267, [arXiv:1309.7077]

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Datta, K

    A. Datta, K. Nishiwaki, and S. Niyogi,Non-minimal Universal Extra Dimensions with Brane Local Terms: The Top Quark Sector, JHEP 01 (2014) 104, [arXiv:1310.6994]

    2014 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Flacke, K

    T. Flacke, K. Kong, and S. C. Park,Phenomenology of Universal Extra Dimensions with Bulk-Masses and Brane-Localized Terms, JHEP 05 (2013) 111, [arXiv:1303.0872]

    2013 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Shaw,Status of exclusion limits of the KK-parity non-conserving resonance production with updated 13 TeV LHC, Acta Phys

    A. Shaw,Status of exclusion limits of the KK-parity non-conserving resonance production with updated 13 TeV LHC, Acta Phys. Polon. B49 (2018) 1421, [arXiv:1709.08077]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    De Rujula, A

    A. De Rujula, A. Donini, M. B. Gavela, and S. Rigolin,Fat brane phenomena, Phys. Lett. B 482 (2000) 195–204, [hep-ph/0001335]

    2000 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Donini and S

    A. Donini and S. Rigolin,Anisotropic type I string compactification, winding modes and large extra dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B550 (1999) 59–76, [hep-ph/9901443]

    1999 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Antoniadis, K

    I. Antoniadis, K. Benakli, and M. Quiros,Direct collider signatures of large extra dimensions, Phys. Lett. B460 (1999) 176–183, [hep-ph/9905311]

    1999 arXiv

  49. [57]

    D. A. Dicus, C. D. McMullen, and S. Nandi,Collider implications of Kaluza-Klein excitations of the gluons, Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 076007, [hep-ph/0012259]

    2002 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Macesanu, C

    C. Macesanu, C. D. McMullen, and S. Nandi,New Signal for Universal Extra Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B546 (2002) 253–260, [hep-ph/0207269]

    2002 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Macesanu, S

    C. Macesanu, S. Nandi, and C. M. Rujoiu,Monojet and single photon signals from universal extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 076001, [hep-ph/0510350]

    2006 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Macesanu, S

    C. Macesanu, S. Nandi, and M. Rujoiu,Single Kaluza Klein production in universal extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 036003, [hep-ph/0407253]. – 41 –

    2005 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Gabrielli and B

    E. Gabrielli and B. Mele,Gravitational decays of heavy particles in large extra dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B647 (2002) 319–343, [hep-ph/0205099]

    2002 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Macesanu, A

    C. Macesanu, A. Mitov, and S. Nandi,Gravity and matter in extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 084008, [hep-ph/0305029]

    2003 arXiv

  55. [63]

    B. A. Dobrescu, D. Hooper, K. Kong, and R. Mahbubani,Spinless photon dark matter from two universal extra dimensions, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2007 (oct,

  56. [64]

    M. T. Arun, D. Choudhury, and D. Sachdeva,Living Orthogonally: Quasi-universal Extra Dimensions, JHEP 01 (2019) 230, [arXiv:1805.01642]

    2019 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Cheng, J

    H.-C. Cheng, J. L. Feng, and K. T. Matchev,Kaluza-Klein dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002) 211301, [hep-ph/0207125]

    2002 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Hooper and S

    D. Hooper and S. Profumo,Dark Matter and Collider Phenomenology of Universal Extra Dimensions, Phys. Rept. 453 (2007) 29–115, [hep-ph/0701197]

    2007 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Colom i Bernadich and C

    M. Colom i Bernadich and C. Pérez de los Heros,Limits on Kaluza–Klein dark matter annihilation in the Sun from recent IceCube results, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020), no. 2 129, [arXiv:1912.04585]

    2020 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Kakizaki, S

    M. Kakizaki, S. Matsumoto, and M. Senami,Relic abundance of dark matter in the minimal universal extra dimension model, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 023504, [hep-ph/0605280]

    2006 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Burnell and G

    F. Burnell and G. D. Kribs,The Abundance of Kaluza-Klein dark matter with coannihilation, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 015001, [hep-ph/0509118]

    2006 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Ishigure, M

    Y. Ishigure, M. Kakizaki, and A. Santa,Thermal relic abundance of the lightest Kaluza-Klein particle in phenomenological universal extra dimension models, arXiv:1611.06760

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    J. M. Cornell, S. Profumo, and W. Shepherd,Dark matter in minimal universal extra dimensions with a stable vacuum and the “right” Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014), no. 5 056005, [arXiv:1401.7050]

    2014 arXiv

  64. [72]

    K. Kong, S. C. Park, and T. G. Rizzo,A vector-like fourth generation with a discrete symmetry from Split-UED, JHEP 07 (2010) 059, [arXiv:1004.4635]

    2010 arXiv

  65. [73]

    C.-R. Chen, M. M. Nojiri, S. C. Park, J. Shu, and M. Takeuchi,Dark matter and collider phenomenology of split-UED, JHEP 09 (2009) 078, [arXiv:0903.1971]

    2009 arXiv

  66. [74]

    S. C. Park and J. Shu,Split Universal Extra Dimensions and Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 091702, [arXiv:0901.0720]

    2009 arXiv

  67. [75]

    del Aguila, M

    F. del Aguila, M. Perez-Victoria, and J. Santiago,Bulk fields with general brane kinetic terms, JHEP 02 (2003) 051, [hep-th/0302023]

    2003 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Carena, T

    M. Carena, T. M. P. Tait, and C. E. M. Wagner,Branes and Orbifolds are Opaque, Acta Phys. Polon. B33 (2002) 2355, [hep-ph/0207056]

    2002 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Cheng, K

    H.-C. Cheng, K. T. Matchev, and M. Schmaltz,Radiative corrections to Kaluza-Klein masses, Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 036005, [hep-ph/0204342]

    2002 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Cheng, K

    H.-C. Cheng, K. T. Matchev, and M. Schmaltz,Bosonic supersymmetry? Getting fooled at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 056006, [hep-ph/0205314]. – 42 –

    2002 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Komatsu et al.,Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation, Astrophys

    WMAP Collaboration, E. Komatsu et al.,Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation, Astrophys. J. Suppl.192 (2011) 18, [arXiv:1001.4538]

    2011 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al.,Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.594 (2016) A13, [arXiv:1502.01589]

    2016 arXiv

  73. [81]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki,Supersymmetric Technicolor, Nucl. Phys. B189 (1981) 575–593

    1981

  74. [82]

    Dimopoulos and S

    S. Dimopoulos and S. Raby,Supercolor, Nucl. Phys. B192 (1981) 353–368

    1981

  75. [83]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,A Phenomenological Model of Particle Physics Based on Supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B110 (1982) 227–231

    1982

  76. [84]

    C. R. Nappi and B. A. Ovrut,Supersymmetric Extension of the SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) Model, Phys. Lett. B113 (1982) 175–179

    1982

  77. [85]

    Alvarez-Gaume, M

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, M. Claudson, and M. B. Wise,Low-Energy Supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 207 (1982) 96

    1982

  78. [86]

    Dimopoulos and S

    S. Dimopoulos and S. Raby,Geometric Hierarchy, Nucl. Phys. B219 (1983) 479

    1983

  79. [87]

    Dine and A

    M. Dine and A. E. Nelson,Dynamical supersymmetry breaking at low-energies, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 1277–1287, [hep-ph/9303230]

    1993 arXiv

  80. [88]

    M. Dine, A. E. Nelson, and Y. Shirman,Low-energy dynamical supersymmetry breaking simplified, Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 1362–1370, [hep-ph/9408384]

    1995 arXiv

  81. [89]

    M. Dine, A. E. Nelson, Y. Nir, and Y. Shirman,New tools for low-energy dynamical supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D53 (1996) 2658–2669, [hep-ph/9507378]

    1996 arXiv

  82. [90]

    G. F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi,Theories with gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rept. 322 (1999) 419–499, [hep-ph/9801271]

    1999 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Datta, A

    A. Datta, A. Datta, and S. Poddar,Enriching the exploration of the mUED model with event shape variables at the CERN LHC, Phys. Lett. B712 (2012) 219–225, [arXiv:1111.2912]

    2012 arXiv

  84. [92]

    K. Kong, K. Matchev, and G. Servant,Extra Dimensions at the LHC, pp. 306–324, 1, 2010. arXiv:1001.4801

    2010 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Bandyopadhyay, B

    P. Bandyopadhyay, B. Bhattacherjee, and A. Datta,Search for Higgs bosons of the Universal Extra Dimensions at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 03 (2010) 048, [arXiv:0909.3108]

    2010 arXiv

  86. [94]

    MACESANU,The phenomenology of universal extra dimensions at hadron colliders, International Journal of Modern Physics A21 (apr, 2006) 2259–2296

    C. MACESANU,The phenomenology of universal extra dimensions at hadron colliders, International Journal of Modern Physics A21 (apr, 2006) 2259–2296

    2006

  87. [95]

    T. Han, J. D. Lykken, and R.-J. Zhang,Kaluza-klein states from large extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D59 (Mar, 1999) 105006

    1999

  88. [96]

    G. F. Giudice, R. Rattazzi, and J. D. Wells,Quantum gravity and extra dimensions at high-energy colliders, Nuclear Physics B544 (apr, 1999) 3–38

    1999

  89. [97]

    Macesanu, A

    C. Macesanu, A. Mitov, and S. Nandi,Gravity and matter in extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 68 (Oct, 2003) 084008

    2003

  90. [98]

    Datta and S

    A. Datta and S. Raychaudhuri,Vacuum Stability Constraints and LHC Searches for a – 43 – Model with a Universal Extra Dimension, Phys. Rev. D87 (2013), no. 3 035018, [arXiv:1207.0476]

    2013 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Datta, A

    A. Datta, A. Patra, and S. Raychaudhuri,Higgs Boson Decay Constraints on a Model with a Universal Extra Dimension, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014), no. 9 093008, [arXiv:1311.0926]

    2014 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Ghosh and K

    K. Ghosh and K. Huitu,Constraints on universal extra dimension models with gravity mediated decays from ATLAS diphoton search, Journal of High Energy Physics2012 (jun, 2012)

    2012

  93. [101]

    Aaboud et al.,Search for supersymmetry in a final state containing two photons and missing transverse momentum in√s = 13 TeVpp collisions at the LHC using the ATLAS detector, Eur

    A TLASCollaboration, M. Aaboud et al.,Search for supersymmetry in a final state containing two photons and missing transverse momentum in√s = 13 TeVpp collisions at the LHC using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016), no. 9 517, [arXiv:1606.09150]

    2016 arXiv

  94. [102]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for supersymmetry in events with at least one photon, missing transverse momentum, and large transverse event activity in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 12 (2017) 142, [arXiv:1707.06193]

    2017 arXiv

  95. [103]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for gauge-mediated supersymmetry in events with at least one photon and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B780 (2018) 118–143, [arXiv:1711.08008]

    2018 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Aad et al.,Search for photonic signatures of gauge-mediated supersymmetry in 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Search for photonic signatures of gauge-mediated supersymmetry in 8 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015), no. 7 072001, [arXiv:1507.05493]

    2015 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez,The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063, [arXiv:0802.1189]

    2008 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez,FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 1896, [arXiv:1111.6097]

    2012 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Chatrchyan et al.,Search for excited leptons inpp collisions at√s = 7 TeV, Phys

    CMS Collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al.,Search for excited leptons inpp collisions at√s = 7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B720 (2013) 309–329, [arXiv:1210.2422]

    2013 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Haase,Study of the electron→ photon misidentification rate in the ATLAS detector, Master’s thesis, Hamburg U., 2011

    J. Haase,Study of the electron→ photon misidentification rate in the ATLAS detector, Master’s thesis, Hamburg U., 2011

    2011

  101. [109]

    Staub,SARAH 4 : A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput

    F. Staub,SARAH 4 : A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1773–1790, [arXiv:1309.7223]

    2014 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Porod and F

    W. Porod and F. Staub,SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun.183 (2012) 2458–2469, [arXiv:1104.1573]

    2012 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 ...

    2014 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Bierlich et al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, arXiv:2203.11601

    C. Bierlich et al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, arXiv:2203.11601

    arXiv

  105. [113]

    Ambrosanio, G

    S. Ambrosanio, G. L. Kane, G. D. Kribs, S. P. Martin, and S. Mrenna,Search for supersymmetry with a light gravitino at the Fermilab Tevatron and CERN LEP colliders, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 5395–5411, [hep-ph/9605398]. – 44 –

    1996 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Dutta, P

    J. Dutta, P. Konar, S. Mondal, B. Mukhopadhyaya, and S. K. Rai,Search for a compressed supersymmetric spectrum with a light Gravitino, JHEP 09 (2017) 026, [arXiv:1704.04617]

    2017 arXiv

  107. [115]

    de Favereau, C

    DELPHES 3 Collaboration, J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi,DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP 02 (2014) 057, [arXiv:1307.6346]

    2014 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Khachatryan et al.,A search for new phenomena in pp collisions at√s = 13TeV in final states with missing transverse momentum and at least one jet using the αT variable, Eur

    CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al.,A search for new phenomena in pp collisions at√s = 13TeV in final states with missing transverse momentum and at least one jet using the αT variable, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017), no. 5 294, [arXiv:1611.00338]

    2017 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Khachatryan et al.,Search for new physics with the MT 2 variable in all-jets final states produced in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 10 (2016) 006, [arXiv:1603.04053]

    CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al.,Search for new physics with the MT 2 variable in all-jets final states produced in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV, JHEP 10 (2016) 006, [arXiv:1603.04053]

    2016 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Khachatryan et al.,Inclusive search for supersymmetry using razor variables in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV, Phys

    CMS Collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al.,Inclusive search for supersymmetry using razor variables in pp collisions at√s = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017), no. 1 012003, [arXiv:1609.07658]

    2017 arXiv

  111. [119]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for supersymmetry in multijet events with missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D96 (2017), no. 3 032003, [arXiv:1704.07781]

    2017 arXiv

  112. [120]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for new phenomena with theMT2 variable in the all-hadronic final state produced in proton–proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017), no. 10 710, [arXiv:1705.04650]

    2017 arXiv

  113. [121]

    CMS Collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for natural and split supersymmetry in proton-proton collisions at√s = 13 TeV in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum, JHEP 05 (2018) 025, [arXiv:1802.02110]

    2018 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Cowan, K

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells,Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C71 (2011) 1554, [arXiv:1007.1727]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 73, 2501 (2013)]

    2011 arXiv

  115. [123]

    T. P. Li and Y. Q. Ma,Analysis methods for results in gamma-ray astronomy, Astrophys. J. 272 (1983) 317–324

    1983

  116. [124]

    R. D. Cousins, J. T. Linnemann, and J. Tucker,Evaluation of three methods for calculating statistical significance when incorporating a systematic uncertainty into a test of the background-only hypothesis for a Poisson process, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A595 (2008), no. 2 480–501, ...

    2008 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Datta, K

    A. Datta, K. Kong, and K. T. Matchev,Minimal Universal Extra Dimensions in CalcHEP/CompHEP, New J. Phys.12 (2010) 075017, [arXiv:1002.4624]

    2010 arXiv

  118. [126]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, JHEP 04 (2015) 040, [arXiv:1410.8849]

    2015 arXiv

  119. [127]

    J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams,Vector boson pair production at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2011) 018, [arXiv:1105.0020]

    2011 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Shen, R.-Y

    Y.-B. Shen, R.-Y. Zhang, W.-G. Ma, X.-Z. Li, and L. Guo,NLO QCD and electroweak corrections to WWW production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017), no. 7 073005, [arXiv:1605.00554]

    2017 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Muselli, M

    C. Muselli, M. Bonvini, S. Forte, S. Marzani, and G. Ridolfi,Top Quark Pair Production beyond NNLO, JHEP 08 (2015) 076, [arXiv:1505.02006]. – 45 –

    2015 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Broggio, A

    A. Broggio, A. Ferroglia, R. Frederix, D. Pagani, B. D. Pecjak, and I. Tsinikos,Top-quark pair hadroproduction in association with a heavy boson at NLO+NNLL including EW corrections, JHEP 08 (2019) 039, [arXiv:1907.04343]

    2019 arXiv

  123. [131]

    de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4

    LHC Higgs Cross Section W orking Group Collaboration, D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, arXiv:1610.07922

    arXiv

  124. [132]

    Kidonakis,Theoretical results for electroweak-boson and single-top production, PoS DIS2015 (2015) 170, [arXiv:1506.04072]

    N. Kidonakis,Theoretical results for electroweak-boson and single-top production, PoS DIS2015 (2015) 170, [arXiv:1506.04072]

    2015 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Catani, L

    S. Catani, L. Cieri, G. Ferrera, D. de Florian, and M. Grazzini,Vector boson production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO, Phys. Rev. Lett.103 (2009) 082001, [arXiv:0903.2120]

    2009 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Balossini, G

    G. Balossini, G. Montagna, C. M. Carloni Calame, M. Moretti, O. Nicrosini, F. Piccinini, M. Treccani, and A. Vicini,Combination of electroweak and QCD corrections to single W production at the Fermilab Tevatron and the CERN LHC, JHEP 01 (2010) 013, [arXiv:0907.0276]

    2010 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Blok and F

    B. Blok and F. A. Ceccopieri,Z plus jets production via double parton scattering inpA collisions at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020), no. 8 762, [arXiv:2004.05186]

    2020 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Balazs, P

    C. Balazs, P. M. Nadolsky, C. Schmidt, and C. P. Yuan,Diphoton background to Higgs boson production at the LHC with soft gluon effects, Phys. Lett. B489 (2000) 157–162, [hep-ph/9905551]

    2000 arXiv

  129. [137]

    J. M. Campbell, J. Rojo, E. Slade, and C. Williams,Direct photon production and PDF fits reloaded, Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018), no. 6 470, [arXiv:1802.03021]

    2018 arXiv

  130. [138]

    A TLASCollaboration, G. Aad et al.,Observation of top-quark pair production in association with a photon and measurement of thet¯tγ production cross section in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015), no. 7 072007, [arXiv:1502.00586]

    2015 arXiv

  131. [139]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, M. Höfer, A. Huss, and R. Schürmann,Single photon production at hadron colliders at NNLO QCD with realistic photon isolation, JHEP 08 (2022) 094, [arXiv:2205.01516]

    2022 arXiv

  132. [140]

    H. A. Chawdhry, M. Czakon, A. Mitov, and R. Poncelet,NNLO QCD corrections to diphoton production with an additional jet at the LHC, JHEP 09 (2021) 093, [arXiv:2105.06940]

    2021 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Bozzi, F

    G. Bozzi, F. Campanario, V. Hankele, and D. Zeppenfeld,NLO QCD corrections to W+W- gamma and Z Z gamma production with leptonic decays, Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 094030, [arXiv:0911.0438]

    2010 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Shen, R.-Y

    Y.-B. Shen, R.-Y. Zhang, W.-G. Ma, X.-Z. Li, Y. Zhang, and L. Guo,NLO QCD + NLO EW corrections toW ZZproductions with leptonic decays at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2015) 186, [arXiv:1507.03693]. [Erratum: JHEP 10, 156 (2016)]

    2015 arXiv

  135. [143]

    S. D. Ellis, C. K. Vermilion, and J. R. Walsh,Techniques for improved heavy particle searches with jet substructure, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 051501, [arXiv:0903.5081]

    2009 arXiv

  136. [144]

    S. D. Ellis, C. K. Vermilion, and J. R. Walsh,Recombination Algorithms and Jet Substructure: Pruning as a Tool for Heavy Particle Searches, Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 094023, [arXiv:0912.0033]. – 46 –

    2010 arXiv

  137. [145]

    J. Y. Araz,Spey: Smooth inference for reinterpretation studies, SciPost Phys. 16 (2024), no. 1 032, [arXiv:2307.06996]

    2024 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Hocker et al.,TMVA - Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis, physics/0703039

    A. Hocker et al.,TMVA - Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis, physics/0703039

    arXiv

  139. [147]

    R. Brun, F. Rademakers, and S. Panacek,ROOT, an object oriented data analysis framework, inCERN School of Computing (CSC 2000), pp. 11–42, 2000

    2000

  140. [148]

    Krohn, M

    D. Krohn, M. D. Schwartz, T. Lin, and W. J. Waalewijn,Jet Charge at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013), no. 21 212001, [arXiv:1209.2421]

    2013 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Thaler and K

    J. Thaler and K. Van Tilburg,Identifying boosted objects with n-subjettiness, Journal of High Energy Physics2011 (Mar., 2011). – 47 –

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.