Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 66 references

Black Mirrors: CPT-Symmetric Alternatives to Black Holes

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Black mirrors: how gravitational collapse could avoid the black hole interior

desk verdict Well-written and honest, but the central black-mirror metric is degenerate at the horizon, so it is not a solution of standard GR; the paper deserves serious refereeing but not acceptance as it stands. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09558 v2 pith:24ROIUGK submitted 2024-12-12 hep-th gr-qc

Kostas Tzanavaris , Latham Boyle , Neil Turok This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords blackmirrorCPTsymmetryeventhorizongravitationalcollapseholealternativesEinstein-Rosenbridgequantumgravitypathintegralentanglemententropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a gravitationally collapsed object need not contain a black hole interior. Instead, the event horizon can connect the exterior spacetime to its own CPT mirror image, producing a "black mirror": a solution with smooth, bounded curvature and no curvature singularity. The authors give the general stationary charged, rotating black mirror explicitly and propose that such solutions are the relevant quantum path-integral saddles when CPT-symmetric boundary conditions are imposed. If correct, the black mirror would sidestep the singular interior, the information paradox, the firewall problem, and the apparent loss of global charges.

What carries the argument

The central object is the black-mirror metric written in ingoing and outgoing null coordinates $(v_\pm,\sigma,\theta,\phi)$, obtained by extending the exterior radial coordinate $\sigma$ to negative values and gluing the two exteriors at $\sigma=0$ through the CPT isometry that flips $\sigma$ and inverts the two-sphere. The identity carrying the argument is the eigenvalue relation $\lambda_+(\sigma)=\lambda_-(-\sigma)$: the two nontrivial metric eigenvalues exchange places across the horizon and both have simple analytic zeros there, so the metric is degenerate yet all curvature invariants remain smooth and finite. This degenerate but smooth structure is what replaces the curvature singularity of the standard black hole.

What would settle it

Evaluate the black-mirror metric (5) at $\sigma=0$ using the standard smooth-manifold definition of the Einstein tensor: because the metric determinant vanishes like $\sigma^2$, the Ricci and Einstein tensors are not defined at the horizon unless one specifies a distributional or limiting prescription, and if no such prescription reproduces the vacuum equations there, the central claim fails. Observationally, a black mirror predicts no interior and no Cauchy horizon, so direct evidence of an infalling probe crossing into an interior region would falsify it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The black mirror is a topologically distinct alternative to the black hole: instead of extending the exterior metric to an interior containing a curvature singularity, the horizon identifies the exterior with its own CPT image, with antipodal inversion on the two-sphere, so that two mirror-image exteriors are glued together and the interiors are removed. In ingoing and outgoing null coordinates covering the two sides, all metric, field-strength, and curvature components are smooth, analytic, and finite across the horizon, and the vacuum Einstein--Maxwell equations are satisfied. Two eigenvalues of the metric tensor swap across the horizon, $\lambda_+(\sigma)=\lambda_-(-\sigma)$, and each has a simple analytic zero at $\sigma=0$, with corresponding simple poles in the inverse metric; the paper presents this as a genuine but mild singularity, unavoidable in any coordinate system that is smooth across the horizon.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a spacetime metric may legitimately become degenerate at the horizon, with two eigenvalues passing through zero and the inverse metric through poles, and still count as a smooth solution of the gravitational field equations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Infalling matter does not enter an interior: a particle falling toward the horizon is smoothly extended to a CPT-mirror trajectory, and the two trajectories meet and annihilate at the horizon, so no singularity lies ahead.
  • Black hole entropy is reinterpreted as entanglement entropy between the two mirror exteriors, with the total Euclidean action of the two-sided spacetime vanishing, consistent with a global pure state.
  • The information and firewall paradoxes dissolve because nothing falls into a causally disconnected interior; information is classically confined to the horizon and can gradually leak off during evaporation.
  • Global charges are not erased: charge falling in on one side is cancelled by anti-charge falling in on the other, so evaporation does not imply violation of global symmetries.
  • Under CPT-symmetric boundary conditions, the black mirror is a regular saddle of the gravitational action, whereas the black hole carries additional singular boundaries that require extra data to specify.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: If degenerate metrics are admitted as physical spacetimes, the same gluing construction could apply to apparent horizons in dynamical collapse, making the paper's conjecture about the matching surface testable in numerical relativity.
  • Extension: The two-sided Euclidean geometry suggests a concrete one-loop calculation: the entanglement entropy between the two exteriors should reproduce the black hole area law, a result implied but not computed in the paper.
  • Extension: A black mirror formed by collapse would differ from a black hole in its late-time response, for example in gravitational-wave ringdown or in the fate of infalling probes; these provide observational discriminators the paper does not analyze.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new classical spacetime, the "black mirror," in which the exterior region of a Schwarzschild or Kerr--Newman black hole is glued across the horizon to its own CPT mirror image, with the interior regions removed and antipodal points of the two-sphere identified. The authors write down the explicit stationary charged, rotating solution in Eddington--Finkelstein-type coordinates (Section II and Appendix A), study its geodesics (Appendix C), compute its action (Appendix D), and argue that the black mirror, rather than the black hole, is the relevant saddle point of the quantum path integral when CPT-symmetric boundary conditions are imposed (Section III). They further argue that this resolves the information and firewall paradoxes and preserves global charges. The central classical claim is that the resulting geometry is smooth and singularity-free across the horizon and satisfies the vacuum Einstein (or Einstein--Maxwell) equations.

Significance. If the central construction were valid, this would be a significant and imaginative proposal: a CPT-symmetric, singularity-free alternative to black holes with claimed implications for the information paradox, the firewall problem, and global symmetry conservation, embedded in the authors' two-sheeted CPT-symmetric cosmology. The paper has genuine strengths: the metrics are written down explicitly; the Euclidean "double cigar" observation in Section II is a clean reformulation of the Gibbons--Hawking analysis; Appendix C provides an explicit integration of infalling geodesics; and the authors are unusually candid, acknowledging in Section II that the metric is degenerate at the horizon and flagging the time-dependent discussion in Section III as speculative. However, the central classical claim fails under standard general relativity: as Eq.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section II, Eq. (6)] The central classical claim — that the black mirror is a smooth, singularity-free solution of the vacuum Einstein equations with the horizon connecting the exterior to its CPT mirror — is not established, because the metric is degenerate at the horizon. As the paper itself states in the paragraph following Eq. (6), the eigenvalues lambda_+- have simple zeros at sigma = 0 and the corresponding eigenvalues of g^mu_nu have simple poles. In standard general relativity the Levi-Civita connection, the Riemann tensor, and the Einstein tensor are defined only for a non-degenerate metric; at sigma = 0 the inverse metric is not defined, so the assertion that "the vacuum Einstein equations R_mu_nu = 0 are satisfied" cannot be evaluated. The authors correctly note that the zeros are unavoidable in coordinates where the metric is continuous across the horizon, and they call the degeneracy "mild," but they do not supply a generalized framework (singular semi-Riemannian geometry, distributional geometry, or a blow-up) in which the field equations are well defined at sigma = 0. The blow-up treatment is deferred to "follow-up work" in Appendix B. Since the smoothness of the solution across the horizon is the basis for the paper's claim to remove the black hole singularity, this issue is load-bearing: as it stands, the black mirror is not shown to be a solution of standard general relativity.
  2. [Appendix B.3] The claim that the black mirror exhibits "charge without charge" and "mass without mass" — a non-zero total two-sided charge and Komar mass with no source, in what is asserted to be a smooth vacuum Einstein-Maxwell solution — is not supported by the displayed mathematics. The paper states both that the mirror quantities tilde-mu_4, tilde-F_A, and star-tilde-F_A vanish at sigma = 0 and that all components of the field strength, Ricci, and Einstein tensors remain smooth and finite across sigma = 0, and it concludes that Stokes' theorem is violated in certain topologically non-trivial circumstances. But for a smooth source-free Maxwell field one has dF = 0 and d*F = 0, from which the standard flux identity follows; a genuine violation requires a precise distributional or topological structure. The expressions given in Appendix B.3 do not by themselves establish such a structure, and the resolution is again deferred to follow-up blow-up techniques. Consequently the charged and rotating black mirror of Appendix A is also not established as a vacuum solution of the Einstein-Maxwell system.
  3. [Appendix D] The saddle-point analysis of Appendix D does not establish that the black mirror is a regular saddle of the Einstein-Hilbert action. The line element (D7) has g_tt = -tanh^2(chi), which vanishes at chi = 0, so the metric is again degenerate at the mirror surface; indeed the time-like tetrad one-form is stated to have a simple zero at chi = 0. The variational derivation leading to Eqs. (D4)-(D5) assumes a non-degenerate metric with a well-defined lapse and inverse metric, so inserting a configuration on which the lapse has a simple zero requires an extension of the variational principle to degenerate metrics, which is not provided. The statement that the total action vanishes because the integrand is odd in x is a property of the integrand, but it does not by itself show that the configuration is a stationary point in the space of non-degenerate Lorentzian metrics, nor that it is the relevant saddle under CPT-symmetric boundary conditions.
  4. [Section III, bullet (i)] The claim that the black mirror is "the relevant saddle point" of the path integral under CPT-symmetric boundary conditions is a proposal rather than a derivation: the boundary conditions of Figure 5 are assumed, not derived, and the comparison between the black hole and black mirror saddles presupposes that the degenerate configuration of Eq. (6) is an admissible saddle in the first place. Given the issues raised in the previous comments, the interpretive conclusions in bullets (i)-(vi), including the proposed resolutions of the information and firewall paradoxes, are conditional on a generalized-geometry framework that the manuscript does not supply.
minor comments (6)
  1. [References] Reference [18] misspells the author's name as "d'Invemo"; it should be "d'Inverno."
  2. [Section II] The assertion that all components of the metric and the Riemann tensor are "everywhere smooth, analytic and finite" is stated without demonstration; in view of the simple poles in the inverse metric, an explicit verification of the claimed cancellations in the connection and curvature components should be given, or a reference supplied.
  3. [Equation (6)] The eigenvalue expression would be easier to verify if the corresponding 2 x 2 metric block in the (v_+, sigma) coordinates were displayed alongside it, together with the relation lambda_+(sigma) = lambda_-(-sigma).
  4. [Figure 2] The caption should state explicitly that the tip degeneracy of the double cone in Euclidean signature is a coordinate artifact, removable by Cartesian coordinates after the period identification, since this contrasts with the genuine degeneracy in the Lorentzian case.
  5. [Section II] The paper describes degenerate metrics as a "mild" singularity but does not engage the existing literature on singular semi-Riemannian geometry and signature change; situating the construction relative to that body of work would clarify what is and is not being assumed.
  6. [Abstract] The abstract's phrase "smooth, bounded curvature" should be conditioned on the proposed generalized notion of solution, since the standard curvature tensors are not defined at sigma = 0 by the usual formulas.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the black mirror metric is an explicit extension of standard exterior solutions, and the CPT-symmetric saddle-point claim is a proposed boundary-condition setup rather than a reduction of a prediction to its own inputs.

full rationale

The black mirror construction is not circular. The Schwarzschild black mirror is obtained by an explicit coordinate substitution from the standard Schwarzschild exterior, extending the coordinate sigma to negative values and identifying antipodal horizon points; the general stationary case in Appendix A starts from the known Kerr-Newman-(A)dS tetrad and repeats the same explicit extension. No parameter is fitted to the claimed output, and no result is a renamed input. The statement that the black mirror is the relevant stationary point is explicitly conditional on the authors' proposed CPT-symmetric boundary conditions: the abstract says 'that we propose', and Section III says 'It is natural to consider the path integral ... with CPT-symmetric boundary conditions'. The authors also explicitly flag the time-dependent part as speculative: 'Since this part of the story can no longer be described explicitly analytically, it is correspondingly less certain and more speculative.' The self-citations to the authors' own CPT-cosmology papers [33-40] appear as a concluding hint ('This CPT-symmetric picture ... fits naturally in the CPT-symmetric picture of the cosmos advocated in [33-40]'), and are not used to prove a uniqueness theorem or to justify the metric itself. The genuine concern raised by Eq. (6) -- that two eigenvalues of the metric have simple zeros at sigma=0 and the inverse metric has simple poles -- is a mathematical consistency objection about whether a degenerate metric is an acceptable spacetime; the paper itself admits this is a 'genuine (but mild) singularity'. That issue belongs to physical correctness, not to circularity, because it does not show that any claimed derivation is equivalent to its inputs. No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations or cited results.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on accepting a degenerate metric at the horizon as a valid solution, on a set of proposed CPT-symmetric boundary conditions, and on an antipodal identification. These are assumptions specific to this paper rather than standard inputs.

assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper A pseudo-Riemannian metric may be degenerate on a codimension-one surface and still count as a solution of Einstein's equations.
    The black mirror metric has simple zeros in two eigenvalues of g_mu_nu at sigma = 0, making the metric non-invertible there; the paper treats this as a mild, acceptable singularity (Section II, around Eq. (6)).
  • ad hoc to paper CPT-symmetric boundary conditions select the black mirror saddle point in the quantum path integral.
    The authors propose these boundary conditions (Section III, Figure 5) without deriving them from an independent principle; the claim that the black mirror is the relevant saddle depends on them.
  • domain assumption The identification of antipodal points on the horizon is allowed and does not introduce unphysical features.
    Used to make the Eddington-Finkelstein extension well-defined (Section II, Figure 3c), following prior work by Gibbons and 't Hooft.
invented entities (2)
  • CPT mirror image exterior (second sheet)
    purpose: Replaces the black hole interior with a mirror copy of the exterior, removing the curvature singularity.
    The second exterior is a topological construction with no independent observable signature outside the metric itself.
  • CPT-symmetric boundary condition for the path integral
    purpose: Selects the black mirror as the relevant stationary point.
    Proposed in this paper; no independent evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Black Mirrors: CPT-Symmetric Alternatives to Black Holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/24ROIUGK

@misc{pith2026241209558,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Black Mirrors: CPT-Symmetric Alternatives to Black Holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/24ROIUGK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09558}
}
read the original abstract

Einstein's equations imply that a gravitationally collapsed object forms an event horizon. But what lies on the other side of this horizon? In this paper, we question the reality of the conventional solution (the black hole), and point out another, topologically distinct solution: the black mirror. In the black hole solution, the horizon connects the exterior metric to an interior metric which contains a curvature singularity. In the black mirror, the horizon instead connects the exterior metric to its own CPT mirror image, yielding a solution with smooth, bounded curvature. We give the general stationary (charged, rotating) black mirror solution explicitly, and also describe the general black mirror formed by gravitational collapse. The black mirror is the relevant stationary point when the quantum path integral is equipped with suitably CPT-symmetric boundary conditions, that we propose. It appears to avoid many vexing puzzles which plague the conventional black hole.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.09558 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Penrose diagram for the eternal Schwarzschild [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The Euclidean Schwarzschild metric, with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. The Penrose diagram for: a black hole formed by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The Penrose diagram for: (a) an unperturbed CPT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The time orientation in (a) a black hole and (b) a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity,

    Albert Einstein and N. Rosen, “The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity,” Phys. Rev. 48, 73–77 (1935)

    work page 1935

  2. [2]

    On continued grav- itational contraction,

    J. R. Oppenheimer and H. Snyder, “On continued grav- itational contraction,” Phys. Rev. 56, 455–459 (1939)

    work page 1939

  3. [3]

    The interior of dynamical vacuum black holes I: The C 0-stability of the Kerr Cauchy horizon,

    Mihalis Dafermos and Jonathan Luk, “The interior of dynamical vacuum black holes I: The C 0-stability of the Kerr Cauchy horizon,” (2017), arXiv:1710.01722 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Breakdown of Predictability in Gravi- tational Collapse,

    S. W. Hawking, “Breakdown of Predictability in Gravi- tational Collapse,” Phys. Rev. D 14, 2460–2473 (1976)

    work page 1976

  5. [5]

    Black Holes: Complementarity or Fire- walls?

    Ahmed Almheiri, Donald Marolf, Joseph Polchinski, and James Sully, “Black Holes: Complementarity or Fire- walls?” JHEP 02, 062 (2013), arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    The elliptic interpretation of black holes and quantum mechanics,

    G. W. Gibbons, “The elliptic interpretation of black holes and quantum mechanics,” Nucl. Phys. B 271, 497–508 (1986)

    work page 1986

  7. [7]

    Empty black holes, firewalls, and the origin of Bekenstein–Hawking entropy,

    Mehdi Saravani, Niayesh Afshordi, and Robert B. Mann, “Empty black holes, firewalls, and the origin of Bekenstein–Hawking entropy,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23, 1443007 (2015), arXiv:1212.4176 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    Traversable wormholes: Some sim- ple examples,

    Matt Visser, “Traversable wormholes: Some sim- ple examples,” Phys. Rev. D 39, 3182–3184 (1989), arXiv:0809.0907 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 1989

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    Traversable wormholes from surgically modified Schwarzschild space-times,

    Matt Visser, “Traversable wormholes from surgically modified Schwarzschild space-times,” Nucl. Phys. B 328, 203–212 (1989), arXiv:0809.0927 [gr-qc]

    1989 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Black hole unitarity and antipo- dal entanglement,

    Gerard ’t Hooft, “Black hole unitarity and antipo- dal entanglement,” Found. Phys. 46, 1185–1198 (2016), arXiv:1601.03447 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    The Firewall Transformation for Black Holes and Some of Its Implications,

    Gerard ’t Hooft, “The Firewall Transformation for Black Holes and Some of Its Implications,” Found. Phys. 47, 1503–1542 (2017), arXiv:1612.08640 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Extremal limits and black hole entropy,

    Sean M. Carroll, Matthew C. Johnson, and Lisa Randall, “Extremal limits and black hole entropy,” JHEP 11, 109 (2009), arXiv:0901.0931 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  5. [13]

    O-BTZ: Orien- tifolded BTZ Black Hole,

    F. Loran and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “O-BTZ: Orien- tifolded BTZ Black Hole,” Phys. Lett. B 693, 184–187 (2010), arXiv:1003.4089 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Orientifolded Lo- cally AdS3 Geometries,

    F. Loran and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Orientifolded Lo- cally AdS3 Geometries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 025013 (2011), arXiv:1008.0462 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  7. [15]

    PT-symmetry in one-way wormholes,

    Pascal Koiran, Hicham Zejli, J. P. Levy, Florent Margnat, M. F. Duval, and Hasnae Zejli, “PT-symmetry in one-way wormholes,” Annals Phys. 470, 169765 (2024), arXiv:2409.02951 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Annihilation-to-nothing: a quantum gravitational boundary condition for the Schwarzschild black hole,

    Mariam Bouhmadi-L´ opez, Suddhasattwa Brahma, Che- Yu Chen, Pisin Chen, and Dong-han Yeom, “Annihilation-to-nothing: a quantum gravitational boundary condition for the Schwarzschild black hole,” JCAP 11, 002 (2020), arXiv:1911.02129 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Annihilation-to-nothing: DeWitt boundary con- dition inside a black hole,

    Suddhasattwa Brahma, Che-Yu Chen, and Dong-han Yeom, “Annihilation-to-nothing: DeWitt boundary con- dition inside a black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 772 (2022), arXiv:2108.05330 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Ray d’Invemo, Introducing Einstein ’s relativity(Oxford University Press, 1992)

    1992

  11. [19]

    other side

    compute the entropy of the Schwarzschild black hole by computing the action of the Euclidean Schwarzschild metric (which comes entirely from the Gibbons-Hawking- York boundary term [19, 20]). And, because they com- pute this action for the one-sided (blue) spacetime, they obta...

  12. [20]

    Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 2752–2756 (1977)

    1977

  13. [21]

    Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,

    James W. York, Jr., “Role of conformal three geometry in the dynamics of gravitation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1082–1085 (1972)

    1972

  14. [22]

    Rotating black holes in higher dimensions with a cos- mological constant,

    G. W. Gibbons, H. Lu, Don N. Page, and C. N. Pope, “Rotating black holes in higher dimensions with a cos- mological constant,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171102 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0409155

    2004 arXiv

  15. [23]

    The General Kerr-de Sitter metrics in all dimensions,

    G. W. Gibbons, H. Lu, Don N. Page, and C. N. Pope, “The General Kerr-de Sitter metrics in all dimensions,” J. Geom. Phys. 53, 49–73 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0404008

    2005 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Entropy of dynamical black holes,

    Stefan Hollands, Robert M. Wald, and Victor G. Zhang, “Entropy of dynamical black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 024070 (2024), arXiv:2402.00818 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Observation of incipient black holes and the in- formation loss problem,

    Tanmay Vachaspati, Dejan Stojkovic, and Lawrence M. Krauss, “Observation of incipient black holes and the in- formation loss problem,” Phys. Rev. D76, 024005 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0609024

    2007 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Quantum ra- diation from quantum gravitational collapse,

    Tanmay Vachaspati and Dejan Stojkovic, “Quantum ra- diation from quantum gravitational collapse,” Phys. Lett. B 663, 107–110 (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0701096

    2008 arXiv

  19. [27]

    A Self-consistent Model of the Black Hole Evaporation,

    Hikaru Kawai, Yoshinori Matsuo, and Yuki Yokokura, “A Self-consistent Model of the Black Hole Evaporation,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28, 1350050 (2013), arXiv:1302.4733 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Quantum fields on manifolds: PCT and gravitationally induced thermal states,

    Geoffrey L. Sewell, “Quantum fields on manifolds: PCT and gravitationally induced thermal states,” Annals Phys. 141, 201–224 (1982)

    1982

  21. [29]

    Information Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Information Preservation and Weather Forecasting for Black Holes,” (2014), arXiv:1401.5761 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199–220 (1975), [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  23. [31]

    Symmetry and Emergence,

    Edward Witten, “Symmetry and Emergence,” Nature Phys. 14, 116–119 (2018), arXiv:1710.01791 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Constraints on Sym- metries from Holography,

    Daniel Harlow and Hirosi Ooguri, “Constraints on Sym- metries from Holography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 191601 (2019), arXiv:1810.05337 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Symmetries in quan- tum field theory and quantum gravity,

    Daniel Harlow and Hirosi Ooguri, “Symmetries in quan- tum field theory and quantum gravity,” Commun. Math. Phys. 383, 1669–1804 (2021), arXiv:1810.05338 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    CPT- Symmetric Universe,

    Latham Boyle, Kieran Finn, and Neil Turok, “CPT- Symmetric Universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251301 (2018), arXiv:1803.08928 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  27. [35]

    The Big 6 Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter,

    Latham Boyle, Kieran Finn, and Neil Turok, “The Big 6 Bang, CPT, and neutrino dark matter,” Annals Phys. 438, 168767 (2022), arXiv:1803.08930 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Two-Sheeted Uni- verse, Analyticity and the Arrow of Time,

    Latham Boyle and Neil Turok, “Two-Sheeted Uni- verse, Analyticity and the Arrow of Time,” (2021), arXiv:2109.06204 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Cancelling the vacuum energy and Weyl anomaly in the standard model with dimension-zero scalar fields,

    Latham Boyle and Neil Turok, “Cancelling the vacuum energy and Weyl anomaly in the standard model with dimension-zero scalar fields,” (2021), arXiv:2110.06258 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    The Big Bang as a Mirror: a Solution of the Strong CP Prob- lem,

    Latham Boyle, Martin Teuscher, and Neil Turok, “The Big Bang as a Mirror: a Solution of the Strong CP Prob- lem,” (2022), arXiv:2208.10396 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Gravitational entropy and the flatness, homogeneity and isotropy puzzles,

    Neil Turok and Latham Boyle, “Gravitational entropy and the flatness, homogeneity and isotropy puzzles,” Phys. Lett. B 849, 138443 (2024), arXiv:2201.07279 [hep- th]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Thermodynamic solution of the homogeneity, isotropy and flatness puzzles (and a clue to the cosmological constant),

    Latham Boyle and Neil Turok, “Thermodynamic solution of the homogeneity, isotropy and flatness puzzles (and a clue to the cosmological constant),” Phys. Lett. B 849, 138442 (2024), arXiv:2210.01142 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    A Minimal Explanation of the Primordial Cosmological Perturbations,

    N. Turok and L. Boyle, “A Minimal Explanation of the Primordial Cosmological Perturbations,” (2023), arXiv:2302.00344 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    On the Accelerated Expansion of the Universe,

    Naman Kumar, “On the Accelerated Expansion of the Universe,” Grav. Cosmol. 30, 85–88 (2024), arXiv:2406.04392 [gr-qc]

    2024

  35. [43]

    Black holes and the second law,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and the second law,” Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4, 737–740 (1972)

    1972

  36. [44]

    Black holes and entropy,

    Jacob D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333–2346 (1973)

    1973

  37. [45]

    Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separable solutions of Einstein’s equations,

    B. Carter, “Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separable solutions of Einstein’s equations,” Commun. Math. Phys. 10, 280–310 (1968)

    1968

  38. [46]

    Black holes equilibrium states,

    B. Carter, “Black holes equilibrium states,” in Les Houches Summer School of Theoretical Physics: Black Holes (1973) pp. 57–214

    1973

  39. [47]

    Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity,

    J. F. Plebanski and M. Demianski, “Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity,” Annals Phys. 98, 98–127 (1976)

    1976

  40. [48]

    Thermodynamics of Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes and conformal field theories,

    Marco M. Caldarelli, Guido Cognola, and Dietmar Klemm, “Thermodynamics of Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes and conformal field theories,” Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 399–420 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9908022

    2000 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Classical physics as geometry: Gravitation, electromagnetism, un- quantized charge, and mass as properties of curved empty space,

    Charles W. Misner and John A. Wheeler, “Classical physics as geometry: Gravitation, electromagnetism, un- quantized charge, and mass as properties of curved empty space,” Annals Phys. 2, 525–603 (1957)

    1957

  42. [50]

    On the Relation Between Charge and Topol- ogy,

    R. Sorkin, “On the Relation Between Charge and Topol- ogy,” J. Phys. A 10, 717–725 (1977)

    1977

  43. [51]

    Matter from Space,

    Domenico Giulini, “Matter from Space,” Einstein Stud. 14, 363–399 (2018), arXiv:0910.2574 [physics.hist-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  44. [52]

    La signification du temps propre en m´ ecanique ondulatoire,

    E. C. G. Stueckelberg, “La signification du temps propre en m´ ecanique ondulatoire,” Helvetica physica acta 14, 322–323 (1941)

    1941

  45. [53]

    Un nou- veau modele de l’´ electron ponctuel en th´ eorie classique,

    Ernst Carl Gerlach Stueckelberg Stueckelberg, “Un nou- veau modele de l’´ electron ponctuel en th´ eorie classique,” Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 51–80 (1941)

    1941

  46. [54]

    Remarks on the creation of pairs of particles in the theory of relativity,

    E. C. G. Stueckelberg, “Remarks on the creation of pairs of particles in the theory of relativity,” Helv. Phys. Acta 14, 588–594 (1941)

    1941

  47. [55]

    On the proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity,

    Richard Schoen and Shing-Tung Yau, “On the proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity,” Com- munications in Mathematical Physics 65, 45–76 (1979)

    1979

  48. [56]

    Proof of the posi- tive mass theorem. II,

    Richard Schoen and Shing-Tung Yau, “Proof of the posi- tive mass theorem. II,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 79, 231–260 (1981)

    1981

  49. [57]

    A Wiley- Interscience Publication

    Phillip Griffiths and Joseph Harris, Principles of alge- braic geometry, Pure and Applied Mathematics. A Wiley- Interscience Publication. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978)

    1978

  50. [58]

    Appendix A: General Stationary black mirror

    Sidney Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1985). Appendix A: General Stationary black mirror

    1985

  51. [59]

    We start in generalized Boyer- Lindquist coordinates ( t, r, θ, ϕ) – the generalization of the Schwarzschild coordinates considered Section II

    Boyer-Lindquist coordinates Consider the general charged, rotating black hole exte- rior in dS or AdS [44–47]. We start in generalized Boyer- Lindquist coordinates ( t, r, θ, ϕ) – the generalization of the Schwarzschild coordinates considered Section II. We define the tetrad e...

    1999

  52. [60]

    Going Euclidean, thermodynamics To construct the Euclidean metric, we start with Boyer-Lindquist coordinates ( t, r, θ, ϕ), and make the Wick rotations t = iτ , a = iˆa, q = iˆq, and consider real values of τ , ˆa, and ˆq, thus obtaining the new tetrad ˆe0 = ˆ∆1/2 r ˆρ (dτ − ˆ...

  53. [61]

    (A9) where dˆω1 = ˆ∆′ r(ˆr+) 2ˆρ2 + (dτ − ˆa sin2θ ˆΞ dϕ) (A10a) dˆω2 = ˆ∆θ ˆρ2 + (ˆadτ + r2 + − ˆa2 ˆΞ dϕ) (A10b) and we see that, by choosing α2 = ˆ∆′ r(ˆr+)/(4ˆρ2 +) we can set the leading coefficient in (A9) to unity. As in the Schwarzschild case, we see the Euclidean met-...

  54. [62]

    In Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates Although the Boyer-Lindquist system has the advan- tage that it makes manifest the full symmetry of the metric, it has the disadvantage that it only covers the exterior r > r+, and fails to extend to (or beyond) the black and white horizons...

  55. [63]

    We start by reviewing the space, time, and spacetime orientations of the maximally-extended Schwarzschild black hole

    Orientations and CP Tversus P T In this subsection, let us explain why the isometry φCP T : (t, σ, θ, φ) → (t, −σ, π− θ, π+ φ) (which inverts the angular 2-sphere) is a classical analogue of the CP T transformation, whereas the isometry φP T: (t, σ, θ, φ) → (t, −σ, θ, φ) (whic...

  56. [64]

    field strength

    T otal charge (and mass) of the black hole. In the following subsection – Appendix B 3 – we will show that the two sides of the blackmirror have the same electric charge and mass, as measured by Gauss’s Law. But first, in the present subsection, we review the cor- responding r...

  57. [65]

    enclosed

    T otal charge (and mass) of the black mirror. Finally, in this section, we turn to the black mirror and find that something surprising happens, due to its non- trivial topology: as determined via Gauss’s Law from the electric field (or gravitational field) flux through a dis- ...

  58. [66]

    (2–5); whereas far from the horizon ( χ → ±∞) the line element (D7) becomes ≈ −dt2 + m2e±4χ dχ2 + 1 4 dΩ2 which, with r = m 2 e±2χ, is just Minkowski spacetime

    the coordinate χ ≈ σ/(4m) where σ is the proper radial coordinate used in Eqs. (2–5); whereas far from the horizon ( χ → ±∞) the line element (D7) becomes ≈ −dt2 + m2e±4χ dχ2 + 1 4 dΩ2 which, with r = m 2 e±2χ, is just Minkowski spacetime. Note that, the total action (D3) – wh...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.