Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 73 references

Two-dimensional orbital-obstructed insulators with higher-order band topology

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bulk symmetry data determines the number of in-gap states that neutral symmetric flakes of SG No. 164 $MX_2$ monolayers must host, via an orbital-obstructed atomic insulator mechanism.

desk verdict Worth refereeing: the paper establishes a filling-anomaly response for orbital-obstructed atomic insulators in common MX2 monolayers, though the integer anomaly values depend on assumptions the authors make explicit. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09561 v2 pith:LP2BTERC submitted 2024-12-12 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Olga Arroyo-Gascón , Sergio Bravo , Mónica Pacheco , Leonor Chico This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords orbital-obstructedatomicinsulatorfillinganomalyhigher-orderbandtopologyelementaryrepresentationsspacegroupP-3m1MX2monolayerscornerstatestwo-dimensionalmaterials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows that a family of two-dimensional $MX_2$ compounds with space group $P\bar{3}m1$—many of them already grown in the lab—are orbital-obstructed atomic insulators: their valence bands admit a Wannier description, but the electron charge centers demanded by the momentum-space band representation do not sit at the atomic positions where the electrons actually reside. Because of that mismatch, a neutral, symmetric hexagonal flake cannot be simultaneously gapped and charge neutral, so it must place a definite number of electrons in in-gap states, a filling anomaly. The paper demonstrates that this number is readable directly from the bulk decomposition into elementary band representations, and confirms the prediction with a minimal tight-binding model and first-principles spectra for three representative monolayers: two obstructed states for $\mathrm{MgCl_2}$, four for $\mathrm{ZrS_2}$, and four modulo twelve for $\mathrm{SnS_2}$. If the claim holds, the bulk symmetry data of any such monolayer tells exactly how many corner electrons its finite flake must host.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is the elementary band representation (EBR) decomposition of the occupied bands, computed by Smith normal form from the matrix equation $\mathrm{EBR}\cdot X = B$, where $B$ is the vector of irreducible representation multiplicities at the high-symmetry points $\Gamma$, $M$, $K$ and the EBR matrix encodes which atomic-orbital-induced representations exist in the space group. The argument works by identifying the movable band representations—charge centers that can slide adiabatically between the $1a$ and $2d$ Wyckoff positions (via the $6i$ site)—and subtracting them from each admissible insulator solution, leaving a pinned remainder. The electrons in the pinned remainder are the obstructed ones, and their count is the predicted filling anomaly.

What would settle it

Compute the symmetry data vector $B$ for $\mathrm{ZrS_2}$ with the Zr $4s$ and $4p$ semicore states included in the valence manifold and re-solve the EBR equation: if the pinned remainder is no longer the $2d$-induced EBR with four electrons, while the DFT flake spectrum still shows four in-gap states, then the orbital-support choice, not the bulk symmetry data, is carrying the prediction. Conversely, a direct STM measurement of the corner charge on a neutral, symmetric hexagonal flake of $\mathrm{MgCl_2}$ could confirm whether the neutrality point really sits inside the two-state in-gap manifold as claimed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that orbital-mediated atomic obstruction occurs in SG $P\bar{3}m1$ monolayers and produces a bulk-detectable filling anomaly. For a valence manifold described by elementary band representations, solving the equation $\mathrm{EBR}\cdot X = B$ for the symmetry-data vector $B$ gives several admissible integer decompositions; the physically retained ones have no charge density at the unoccupied $3e$ Wyckoff position, and after subtracting the movable atomic-insulator contribution, a pinned remainder survives consisting of a $2d$-induced EBR whose charge centers have no (or only partial) support at the atoms. The number of electrons carried by that pinned EBR—one per Cl atom in $\mathrm{MgCl_2}$, two per S atom in $\mathrm{ZrS_2}$, and two per S atom in $\mathrm{SnS_2}$—matches the in-gap state count seen in finite flake spectra, establishing a bulk-boundary correspondence for the orbital obstruction. The paper also shows that the filling anomaly is robust to the presence or absence of edge states, and that it can appear for both fully filled and half-filled $2d$-induced EBRs.

Load-bearing premise

All of the predicted numbers depend on which integer solution of the EBR equation is taken as the physical one and on the assumed valence-electron configuration: if the charge centers were allowed to sit at the unoccupied $3e$ Wyckoff position, or if the valence manifold includes different orbitals (for example semicore $d$ states), the predicted two, four, or four electrons could change, even though the finite-flake spectra themselves are unchanged.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the bulk decomposition is right, corner-state or in-gap-state counts can be predicted from bulk symmetry data alone, without any finite-flake calculation.
  • The filling anomaly is robust even when edge states are absent or buried in the bulk bands, since it is tied to the pinned EBR, not to boundary state localization.
  • The mechanism extends beyond the half-filled $2d$-EBR case previously studied: compounds with fully filled $2d$-induced EBRs (several transition-metal dichalcogenides) also show the obstruction.
  • Standard symmetry-indicator invariants miss the anomaly for the halogen-based monolayers discussed here, so the full EBR decomposition is required to count obstructed states.
  • The same Smith-decomposition workflow can be applied to any other material in SG No. 164, and the paper's survey assigns a specific anomaly value (2 or 4, modulo 12) to a long list of candidate monolayers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One testable consequence the paper does not spell out: because the $\mathrm{SnS_2}$ anomaly is defined modulo 12, adding or removing one electron per unit cell in a gated flake should cycle the in-gap population through the same twelve-state manifold, a signature that could be looked for in transport or charging experiments.
  • The predicted count is hostage to the assumed atomic valence configuration; recomputing the symmetry data with for example Zr semicore $4s$, $4p$ states in the valence manifold could shift the pinned remainder and would therefore change the expected anomaly for the same material.
  • The same 'pinned EBR without full real-space support' criterion could be screened over other layer groups that contain movable Wyckoff positions, suggesting that orbital-obstructed insulators are more common than the current list.
  • The paper links the presence of in-gap corner states to a non-protected edge-to-corner correspondence in the ribbon spectrum; if that correspondence is general, a simple ribbon band-structure calculation could serve as a diagnostic for corner-state formation in other materials.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies monolayer MX₂ compounds with space group P̄3m1 and argues that they realize orbital-obstructed atomic insulators (OOAIs). Using topological quantum chemistry (TQC), a minimal six-band tight-binding model, and first-principles DFT calculations, it predicts that neutral symmetric hexagonal flakes display a filling anomaly of two obstructed states for MgCl₂, four for ZrS₂, and four modulo twelve for SnS₂, with the predictions verified in finite-flake spectra in Fig. 4g–i. The work also discusses the relation between edge states and corner localization, and surveys a broader set of candidate materials in Table II.

Significance. If correct, the paper would establish a concrete bulk-boundary correspondence for 2D orbital-obstructed atomic insulators, showing that symmetry-data vectors and EBR decompositions can predict the number of electrons that must occupy in-gap states in finite flakes. The manuscript is in many ways exemplary: the EBR matrix and Smith decomposition are given explicitly, the tight-binding model is fully defined in the Appendix, and the flake spectra are computed with an independent code (SIESTA), providing a genuine nontrivial check of the bulk prediction. The identification of a filling anomaly for the fully filled 2d-EBR regime (MgCl₂ and ZrS₂) extends earlier work on half-filled cases such as SnS₂. However, as detailed in the major comments, the exact anomaly integers are not uniquely fixed by the bulk symmetry data alone; they require additional assumptions about the EBR decomposition and the number of electrons assigned to the obstructed EBR. These assumptions are validated for the three computed flakes, but not derived from first principles, which weakens the predictive claim for the rest of Table II.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV, Eq. (10) and following text] The generic solution X in Eq. (10) contains a free integer parameter y₂; all y₂ ≠ 0 solutions are discarded solely because they would place charge centers at the unoccupied 3e WP. However, an obstructed atomic insulator (OAI) is precisely a phase whose Wannier charge centers are not located at the occupied Wyckoff positions (Ref. [16]), so the criterion 'charge centers at 3e are unphysical' is an additional physical assumption rather than a consequence of the symmetry data B. If a y₂ ≠ 0 decomposition were chosen, the pinned solution X_O and hence the predicted filling anomaly would change. The paper should either justify the choice y₂ = 0 from the orbital character of the DFT wavefunctions or explicitly state that X_O is one of several admissible decompositions and that the anomaly prediction depends on that choice, which currently is not made.
  2. [Section IV, MgCl₂ and ZrS₂ paragraphs, Eqs. (15) and (19)] MgCl₂ and ZrS₂ have identical symmetry data vectors B (Eqs. 5 and 16) and identical pinned solutions X_O (Eqs. 15 and 19), yet are assigned filling anomalies of 2 and 4 solely because the authors assume one electron per Cl atom in the 2d EBR for MgCl₂ and two electrons per S atom for ZrS₂. This demonstrates that the exact anomaly magnitude is not fixed by the bulk EBR decomposition; it depends on an assumed atomic valence configuration that is not derived from the symmetry analysis. The finite-flake spectra in Fig. 4g,h independently confirm the assigned values for these two materials, but they do not validate the orbital-support assignment for the remaining compounds in Table II. A first-principles criterion (e.g., projected orbital occupations or Wannier-function spreads) should be provided for the number of electrons forming the obstructed EBR, or the claim should be restricted to a modulo-12 statement.
  3. [Section IV, SnS₂ paragraph and Table II footnote] For SnS₂ the finite flake shows a deficit of eight electrons at the neutrality point, whereas the bulk obstructed count is four; the two are reconciled by declaring the filling anomaly well defined only modulo 12 because the movable atomic insulator (MAI) carries 12 electrons. This means that, for this material, the bulk symmetry data alone determine the anomaly only modulo 12, and the exact integer is fixed by the flake calculation (or by an additional real-space assumption). The abstract and Section III C state that the filling anomaly is 'directly associated with the bulk configuration,' which overstates the precision of the bulk-only prediction. The modulo-12 qualification should appear prominently in the general derivation and in the abstract, not only in the footnote of Table II, and the paper should clarify whether the modulo-12 ambiguity also affects the exact values 2 and 4 assigned to MgCl₂ and ZrS₂.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'orbital-mediated atomic obstruction requires the presence of orbitals that have no support in real space' is confusing and appears to contradict the body's definition in Section I, where OOAIs are defined as having all EBRs from occupied WPs but with a mismatch between the expected and actual orbital-induced representations. Please rephrase, e.g., 'EBRs whose induced charge centers are not supported at the expected atomic orbitals.'
  2. [Section IV, after Eq. (6)] The sentence contains a typo: 'one o more solutions' should read 'one or more solutions.'
  3. [Section IV, ZrS₂ paragraph] 'which traduces in a four-state filling anomaly' should be 'which translates into a four-state filling anomaly.'
  4. [Section III A] The statement that the only symmetry-allowed real-space arrangement is '2 electrons at the 1a WP and one electron per site of the 2d WP' is specific to the minimal model with four electrons per unit cell; this qualification should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion with the real materials, which have more valence electrons.
  5. [Figure 2d] The caption of Fig. 2d does not list the tight-binding parameters used for the flake spectrum; since the same model is used for Fig. 3c, please either refer to the caption of Fig. 3c or provide the parameter values in the Fig. 2d caption.
  6. [Table II] The footnote 'Recall that this value is well defined only modulo 12' is an important qualification that should be integrated into the main text where the anomaly values are introduced (Section IV, MgCl₂ paragraph), not only in the table footnote.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the bulk EBR filling-anomaly predictions are independently checked against SIESTA flake spectra.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain from the tight-binding model (Section III) through the EBR decompositions (Section IV, Eqs. 5-23) to the finite-flake spectra in Fig. 4. The central claim is that the bulk EBR data predict the number of obstructed in-gap states, and that this number matches the filling anomaly of neutral symmetric hexagonal flakes. The flake spectra are computed with SIESTA using GGA-PBE and spin-orbit coupling, independently of the tight-binding parameters and of the EBR Smith-decomposition procedure; the tight-binding parameters are explicitly illustrative ('For convenience, these values are chosen such that no band inversion is produced') rather than fitted to the flake data. The bulk inputs are the ab initio symmetry-data vector B, the standard EBR matrix, and the atomic valence configurations; none of these are extracted from the flake spectra that they are used to predict. The discarded y2 != 0 solutions are a classification restriction to occupied Wyckoff positions, which is part of the definition of an orbital-obstructed atomic insulator rather than a fitted parameter. The identical pinned solutions X_O for MgCl2 and ZrS2 with different anomaly values (2 vs 4) reflect the external chemical input of how many electrons per chalcogen/halogen occupy the obstructed 2d EBR, and the independent flake spectra reproduce the difference. The SnS2 statement that the anomaly is well defined only modulo 12 is an acknowledged limitation of the invariant, not a circular adjustment of the prediction. Self-citations, including Ref. [59] on fragile topology, are not load-bearing for the main bulk-boundary result. I therefore find no step in which a predicted quantity reduces by construction to an input or a fitted parameter.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the TQC EBR formalism, on PBE-DFT band irreps, and on a chosen decomposition of the band representation. The only truly free numbers are the integer decomposition parameters and the illustrative tight-binding parameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Integer decomposition parameters y1 and y2 (Eq. 10) = y2 = 0; y1 = 1 for solution X^A, y1 = 2 for solution X^B
    These integers are free within the positivity constraints; choosing them selects which EBR decomposition describes the insulator and hence determines the pinned obstruction and anomaly magnitude.
  • Tight-binding model parameters (epsilon1a, epsilon2d, t1, t2, r1, r2, r3, r4, s1) = Not fitted to DFT; for example epsilon1a = 0.2 eV, epsilon2d = -0.5 eV, r2 = 0.08 or 0.36 eV
    Chosen by hand to illustrate the two edge-state regimes in Fig. 3. The filling-anomaly count does not depend on these values, but the edge-state discussion does.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Every atomic-insulator valence manifold can be expressed as a non-negative integer sum of elementary band representations induced from maximal Wyckoff positions.
    Foundational TQC result from Refs. 8, 9, and 15, invoked throughout Sections III and IV.
  • standard math Smith decomposition of the EBR matrix correctly enumerates all integer solutions of EBR times X equals B.
    Method of Ref. 58, used in Section IV and the Appendix.
  • domain assumption The first-principles PBE plus spin-orbit band structures correctly give the irrep vectors B for MgCl2, ZrS2, and SnS2.
    The analysis relies on DFT approximations without experimental or higher-level verification of the band order or irreps.
  • domain assumption Charge neutrality plus symmetry fixes the finite-flake filling to two electrons on every 1a site and one electron per 2d site.
    Used in Section III.C to define the filling-anomaly equation and to set the filling in all flake spectra.
  • domain assumption The support of the 2d EBR can be assigned from assumed atomic valence configurations such as Cl 3s23p5 and S 3s23p4.
    Controls whether the anomaly is two or four in Section IV; no direct orbital-resolved Wannier function calculation is shown.
  • domain assumption The decomposable EBR E1(2d) can be split as an ordinary EBR plus a fragile band for the edge-state discussion.
    Stated in Section III.A: the authors assume this decomposition to simplify the edge-state discussion. It is not needed for the filling-anomaly count.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-dimensional orbital-obstructed insulators with higher-order band topology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LP2BTERC

@misc{pith2026241209561,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-dimensional orbital-obstructed insulators with higher-order band topology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LP2BTERC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09561}
}
abstract

Obstructed atomic phases, with their realizations in systems of diverse dimensionality, have recently arisen as one of the topological states with greatest potential to show higher-order phenomena. In this work we report a special type of obstruction, known as orbital-mediated atomic obstruction, in monolayers of materials with spatial symmetry described by the space group $P$-$3m1$. By means of a minimal tight-binding model and first-principles calculations, we show that this obstructed phase is related to the mismatch of the charge centers coming from the atomic limit with respect to the centers that are obtained from a reciprocal space description. Although we find atomic limits that correspond with occupied atomic sites, orbital-mediated atomic obstruction requires the presence of orbitals that have no support in real space. In order to demonstrate the nontrivial character of the obstruction, we confirm the presence of a filling anomaly for finite geometries that is directly associated with the bulk configuration, and discuss the role of the boundary states and their underlying mechanism. Several material examples are presented to illustrate the ubiquity of these nontrivial responses and, in turn, to discuss the differences related to the particular ground state configuration. In addition, we perform a survey of materials and elaborate a list of candidate systems which will host this obstructed phase in monolayer form.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.09561 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Top panel: crystal structure of a SG No. 164 unit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Schematic band structure for the minimal tight-binding model of Section III. (b) Diagrammatic depiction of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Finite-width ribbon geometry, with an edge termination analogous to that of the hexagonal flake of Fig. 2c. Edges [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Top panels (a - c): band structures of the three highlighted MX [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [16]

    Slager, A

    R.-J. Slager, A. Mesaros, V. Juriˇ ci´ c, and J. Zaanen, The space group classification of topological band-insulators, Nature Physics 9, 98–102 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [1]

    M. G. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, C. Felser, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, and Z. Wang, A complete catalogue of high- quality topological materials, Nature 566, 480 (2019)

    2019

  3. [2]

    Zhang, Y

    T. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Z. Song, H. Huang, Y. He, Z. Fang, H. Weng, and C. Fang, Catalogue of topological elec- tronic materials, Nature 566, 475 (2019)

    2019

  4. [3]

    B. J. Wieder, B. Bradlyn, J. Cano, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, L. Elcoro, A. A. Soluyanov, C. Felser, T. Ne- upert, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological ma- terials discovery from crystal symmetry, Nature Reviews Materials 7, 196 (2022)

    2022

  5. [4]

    4, the corner states are high- lighted in a similar way as for the rest of panels

    For the sake of consistency with the rest of eigenvalue spectra presented in Fig. 4, the corner states are high- lighted in a similar way as for the rest of panels. The LDOS at an energy range around the neutrality point is 9 sketched in Fig. 4e, showing that the corner localization still survives; as explained by the model, the support of these states co...

    work page

  6. [5]

    Schindler, A

    F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. P. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher-order topological insulators, Science Advances 4, eaat0346 (2018)

    2018

  7. [6]

    Schindler, Z

    F. Schindler, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, A. M. Cook, A. Murani, S. Sengupta, A. Y. Kasumov, R. Deblock, S. Jeon, I. Drozdov, H. Bouchiat, S. Gu´ eron, A. Yazdani, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher-order topology in bismuth, Nature Physics 14, 918 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [7]

    Y. Han, C. Cui, X.-P. Li, T.-T. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z.- M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Cornertronics in two-dimensional second-order topological insulators, Physical Review Let- ters 133, 10.1103/physrevlett.133.176602 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.176602 2024

Show all 73 references
  1. [8]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Quantized electric multipole insulators, Science 357, 61 (2017)

    2017

  2. [9]

    J. Cano, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, L. Elcoro, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Building blocks of topological quantum chemistry: El- ementary band representations, Physical Review B 97, 035139 (2018)

    2018

  3. [10]

    Bradlyn, L

    B. Bradlyn, L. Elcoro, J. Cano, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological quantum chemistry, Nature 547, 298 (2017)

    2017

  4. [11]

    Khalaf, H

    E. Khalaf, H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Symmetry Indicators and Anomalous Surface States of Topological Crystalline Insulators, Physical Review X 8, 031070 (2018)

    2018

  5. [12]

    H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Symmetry- based indicators of band topology in the 230 space groups, Nature Communications 8, 50 (2017). 13

    2017

  6. [13]

    Kruthoff, J

    J. Kruthoff, J. de Boer, J. van Wezel, C. L. Kane, and R.-J. Slager, Topological classification of crystalline in- sulators through band structure combinatorics, Physical Review X 7, 041069 (2017)

    2017

  7. [14]

    H. C. Po, Symmetry indicators of band topology, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 32, 263001 (2020)

    2020

  8. [15]

    Cano and B

    J. Cano and B. Bradlyn, Band Representations and Topological Quantum Chemistry, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics 12, 225 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Y. Xu, L. Elcoro, G. Li, Z.-D. Song, N. Regnault, Q. Yang, Y. Sun, S. Parkin, C. Felser, and B. A. Bernevig, Three-Dimensional Real Space Invariants, Ob- structed Atomic Insulators and A New Principle for Ac- tive Catalytic Sites (2021), arXiv:2111.02433 [cond-mat]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Y. Xu, L. Elcoro, Z.-D. Song, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, S. S. P. Parkin, N. Regnault, J. L. Ma˜ nes, and B. A. Bernevig, Filling-enforced obstructed atomic insulators, Physical Review B 109, 165139 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    W. A. Benalcazar, T. Li, and T. L. Hughes, Quantization of fractional corner charge in C n -symmetric higher-order topological crystalline insulators, Physical Review B 99, 245151 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    G. Li, Y. Xu, Z. Song, Q. Yang, Y. Zhang, J. Liu, U. Gupta, V. S¨ uβ, Y. Sun, P. Sessi, S. S. P. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, and C. Felser, Obstructed Surface States as the Descriptor for Predicting Catalytic Active Sites in Inorganic Crystalline Materials, Advanced Materials 34, ...

    2022

  13. [21]

    J. Gao, Y. Qian, H. Jia, Z. Guo, Z. Fang, M. Liu, H. Weng, and Z. Wang, Unconventional materials: The mismatch between electronic charge centers and atomic positions, Science Bulletin 67, 598 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Schindler, M

    F. Schindler, M. Brzezi´ nska, W. A. Benalcazar, M. Iraola, A. Bouhon, S. S. Tsirkin, M. G. Vergniory, and T. Neu- pert, Fractional corner charges in spin-orbit coupled crys- tals, Physical Review Research 1, 033074 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Petralanda, Y

    U. Petralanda, Y. Jiang, B. A. Bernevig, N. Regnault, and L. Elcoro, Two-dimensional topological quantum chemistry and catalog of topological materials (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Sheng, Y

    H. Sheng, Y. Xie, Q. Wu, H. Weng, X. Dai, B. A. Bernevig, Z. Fang, and Z. Wang, Majorana corner modes in unconventional monolayers of the 1T-PtSe 2 family, Physical Review B 110, 035151 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    G. Ye, Y. Gong, S. Lei, Y. He, B. Li, X. Zhang, Z. Jin, L. Dong, J. Lou, R. Vajtai, W. Zhou, and P. M. Ajayan, Synthesis of large-scale atomic-layer SnS2 through chem- ical vapor deposition, Nano Research 10, 2386 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Ma˜ nas-Valero, V

    S. Ma˜ nas-Valero, V. Garc ´ ıa-L´ opez, A. Cantarero, and M. Galbiati, Raman Spectra of ZrS 2 and ZrSe 2 from Bulk to Atomically Thin Layers, Applied Sciences 6, 264 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    C. Xu, B. Li, W. Jiao, W. Zhou, B. Qian, R. Sankar, N. D. Zhigadlo, Y. Qi, D. Qian, F.-C. Chou, and X. Xu, Topological Type-II Dirac Fermions Approaching the Fermi Level in a Transition Metal Dichalcogenide NiTe 2, Chemistry of Materials 30, 4823 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Tsipas, D

    P. Tsipas, D. Tsoutsou, S. Fragkos, R. Sant, C. Alvarez, H. Okuno, G. Renaud, R. Alcotte, T. Baron, and A. Di- moulas, Massless Dirac Fermions in ZrTe 2 Semimetal Grown on InAs(111) by van der Waals Epitaxy, ACS Nano 12, 1696 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Y. Wang, L. Li, W. Yao, S. Song, J. T. Sun, J. Pan, X. Ren, C. Li, E. Okunishi, Y.-Q. Wang, E. Wang, Y. Shao, Y. Y. Zhang, H.-t. Yang, E. F. Schwier, H. Iwa- sawa, K. Shimada, M. Taniguchi, Z. Cheng, S. Zhou, S. Du, S. J. Pennycook, S. T. Pantelides, and H.-J. Gao, Monolayer P...

    2015

  22. [30]

    Zhang, M

    K. Zhang, M. Yan, H. Zhang, H. Huang, M. Arita, Z. Sun, W. Duan, Y. Wu, and S. Zhou, Experimental evidence for type-II Dirac semimetal in PtSe 2, Physical Review B 96, 125102 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Sinha, T

    S. Sinha, T. Zhu, A. France-Lanord, Y. Sheng, J. C. Grossman, K. Porfyrakis, and J. H. Warner, Atomic structure and defect dynamics of monolayer lead iodide nanodisks with epitaxial alignment on graphene, Nature Communications 11, 823 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Q.-Q. Yuan, F. Zheng, Z.-Q. Shi, Q.-Y. Li, Y.-Y. Lv, Y. Chen, P. Zhang, and S.-C. Li, Direct Growth of van der Waals Tin Diiodide Monolayers, Advanced Science8, 2100009 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    L. Liu, D. Zemlyanov, and Y. P. Chen, Epitaxial growth of monolayer PdTe 2 and patterned PtTe 2 by direct tel- lurization of Pd and Pt surfaces, 2D Materials 8, 045033 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    E. Chen, W. Xu, J. Chen, and J. H. Warner, 2D layered noble metal dichalcogenides (Pt, Pd, Se, S) for electronics and energy applications, Materials Today Advances 7, 100076 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    M. N. Gjerding, A. Taghizadeh, A. Rasmussen, S. Ali, F. Bertoldo, T. Deilmann, N. R. Knøsgaard, M. Kruse, A. H. Larsen, S. Manti, T. G. Pedersen, U. Petralanda, T. Skovhus, M. K. Svendsen, J. J. Mortensen, T. Olsen, and K. S. Thygesen, Recent progress of the Computa- tional 2D...

    2021

  28. [36]

    Haastrup, M

    S. Haastrup, M. Strange, M. Pandey, T. Deilmann, P. S. Schmidt, N. F. Hinsche, M. N. Gjerding, D. Torelli, P. M. Larsen, A. C. Riis-Jensen, J. Gath, K. W. Jacobsen, J. J. Mortensen, T. Olsen, and K. S. Thygesen, The Compu- tational 2D Materials Database: High-throughput mod- e...

    2018

  29. [37]

    Elcoro, B

    L. Elcoro, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, M. G. Vergniory, J. Cano, C. Felser, B. A. Bernevig, D. Orobengoa, G. de la Flor, and M. I. Aroyo, Double crystallographic groups and their representations on the Bilbao Crystallographic Server, Journal of Applied Crystallography 50, 1457 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, C. Capillas, E. Kroumova, S. Ivantchev, G. Madariaga, A. Kirov, and H. Won- dratschek, Bilbao Crystallographic Server: I. Databases and crystallographic computing programs, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials 221, 15 (2006)

    2006

  31. [39]

    Aroyo, J

    M. Aroyo, J. Perez-Mato, D. Orobengoa, E. Tasci, G. De La Flor, and A. Kirov, Crystallography online: Bilbao crystallographic server, Bulgarian Chemical Com- munications 43, 183 (2011)

    2011

  32. [40]

    M. I. Aroyo, A. Kirov, C. Capillas, J. M. Perez-Mato, and H. Wondratschek, Bilbao Crystallographic Server. II. Representations of crystallographic point groups and space groups, Acta Crystallographica Section A Founda- tions of Crystallography 62, 115 (2006). 14

    2006

  33. [41]

    Zhang, Z.-M

    Z. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, G.-B. Liu, and Y. Yao, Magnetictb: A package for tight-binding model of magnetic and non- magnetic materials, Computer Physics Communications 270, 108153 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio, eds., Group Theory , SpringerLink B¨ ucher (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

    2008

  35. [43]

    H. C. Po, H. Watanabe, and A. Vishwanath, Fragile topology and wannier obstructions, Physical Review Let- ters 121, 126402 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    J. Cano, B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, L. Elcoro, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. I. Aroyo, and B. A. Bernevig, Topology of Disconnected Elementary Band Representa- tions, Physical Review Letters 120, 266401 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Electric multipole moments, topological multipole mo- ment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline in- sulators, Physical Review B 96, 245115 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Bradlyn, Z

    B. Bradlyn, Z. Wang, J. Cano, and B. A. Bernevig, Dis- connected elementary band representations, fragile topol- ogy, and Wilson loops as topological indices: An example on the triangular lattice, Physical Review B 99, 045140 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    G. F. Lange, A. Bouhon, and R.-J. Slager, Subdimen- sional topologies, indicators, and higher order boundary effects, Phys. Rev. B 103, 195145 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Khalaf, W

    E. Khalaf, W. A. Benalcazar, T. L. Hughes, and R. Queiroz, Boundary-obstructed topological phases, Physical Review Research 3, 013239 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    S. Kooi, G. Van Miert, and C. Ortix, The bulk-corner cor- respondence of time-reversal symmetric insulators, npj Quantum Materials 6, 1 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    Z. Wang, B. J. Wieder, J. Li, B. Yan, and B. A. Bernevig, Higher-Order Topology, Monopole Nodal Lines, and the Origin of Large Fermi Arcs in Transition Metal Dichalco- genides XTe 2 (X = Mo, W), Physical Review Letters 123, 186401 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Costa, B

    M. Costa, B. Focassio, L. M. Canonico, T. P. Cysne, G. R. Schleder, R. B. Muniz, A. Fazzio, and T. G. Rappoport, Connecting Higher-Order Topology with the Orbital Hall Effect in Monolayers of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Physical Review Letters 130, 116204 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Nu˜ nez, S

    V. Nu˜ nez, S. Bravo, J. D. Correa, L. Chico, and M. Pacheco, Higher-order obstructed atomic insulator phase in pentagonal monolayer PdSe 2, 2D Materials 11, 015015 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    J. Zeng, H. Liu, H. Jiang, Q.-F. Sun, and X. C. Xie, Multiorbital model reveals a second-order topological in- sulator in 1 H transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Review B 104, L161108 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    Qian, G.-B

    S. Qian, G.-B. Liu, C.-C. Liu, and Y. Yao, Cn -symmetric higher-order topological crystalline insulators in atomi- cally thin transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Re- view B 105, 045417 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    G. Long, M. Pan, H. Zeng, and H. Huang, Second-order topological insulators in two-dimensional monolayers of the 1T-phase PtSe 2 material class, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 044203 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    G. Liu, H. Jiang, Z. Guo, X. Zhang, L. Jin, C. Liu, and Y. Liu, Magnetic Second-Order Topological Insulators in 2H-Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Advanced Science 10, 2301952 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    M. Jung, Y. Yu, and G. Shvets, Exact higher-order bulk-boundary correspondence of corner-localized states, Physical Review B 104, 195437 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    Manna, S

    S. Manna, S. Nandy, and B. Roy, Higher-order topologi- cal phases on fractal lattices, Phys. Rev. B 105, L201301 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Arroyo-Gasc´ on, S

    O. Arroyo-Gasc´ on, S. Bravo, L. Chico, and M. Pacheco, Fractional corner charges in threefold-symmetric two- dimensional materials with fragile topology, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023282 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    Elcoro, Z

    L. Elcoro, Z. Song, and B. A. Bernevig, Application of induction procedure and Smith decomposition in calcu- lation and topological classification of electronic band structures in the 230 space groups, Physical Review B 102, 035110 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y. X. Zhao, Y. Yao, and S. A. Yang, Hilbert band complexes and their applications, Phys. Rev. B 111, 075154 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    Z.-D. Song, L. Elcoro, Y.-F. Xu, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Fragile Phases as Affine Monoids: Classifi- cation and Material Examples, Physical Review X 10, 031001 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    A. V. Ushakov, S. V. Streltsov, and D. I. Khomskii, Crystal field splitting in correlated systems with nega- tive charge-transfer gap, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 23, 445601 (2011)

    2011

  56. [64]

    D. I. Khomskii, Transition Metal Compounds , 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    2014

  57. [65]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. M...

    2009

  58. [66]

    Kuneˇ s, V

    J. Kuneˇ s, V. I. Anisimov, S. L. Skornyakov, A. V. Lukoy- anov, and D. Vollhardt, NiO: Correlated Band Structure of a Charge-Transfer Insulator, Physical Review Letters 99, 156404 (2007)

    2007

  59. [67]

    M. G. Vergniory, B. J. Wieder, L. Elcoro, S. S. P. Parkin, C. Felser, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, All topolog- 15 ical bands of all nonmagnetic stoichiometric materials, Science 376, eabg9094 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Ger...

    2017

  61. [69]

    J. M. Soler, E. Artacho, J. D. Gale, A. Garc ´ ıa, J. Jun- quera, P. Ordej´ on, and D. S´ anchez-Portal, The SIESTA method for ab initio order-N materials simulation, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter 14, 2745 (2002)

    2002

  62. [70]

    Iraola, J

    M. Iraola, J. L. Ma˜ nes, B. Bradlyn, M. K. Horton, T. Ne- upert, M. G. Vergniory, and S. S. Tsirkin, IrRep: Sym- metry eigenvalues and irreducible representations of ab initio band structures, Computer Physics Communica- tions 272, 108226 (2022)

    2022

  63. [71]

    C. W. Groth, M. Wimmer, A. R. Akhmerov, and X. Waintal, Kwant: a software package for quantum transport, New Journal of Physics 16, 063065 (2014)

    2014

  64. [72]

    Garc ´ ıa, N

    A. Garc ´ ıa, N. Papior, A. Akhtar, E. Artacho, V. Blum, E. Bosoni, P. Brandimarte, M. Brandbyge, J. I. Cerd´ a, F. Corsetti, R. Cuadrado, V. Dikan, J. Ferrer, J. Gale, P. Garc ´ ıa-Fern´ andez, V. M. Garc ´ ıa-Su´ arez, S. Garc ´ ıa, G. Huhs, S. Illera, R. Koryt´ ar, P. Koval...

    2020

  65. [164]

    In addition, we have discussed the effect of this phenomenon in a finite geometry, leading to a filling anomaly

    Using the TQC formalism, we have provided a de- tailed characterization of the mechanism that allows the emergence of this orbital obstruction. In addition, we have discussed the effect of this phenomenon in a finite geometry, leading to a filling anomaly. Remarkably, this 10 ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.