Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Vector Portals at Future Lepton Colliders

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Future lepton colliders can probe weakly coupled Z' bosons one to two orders of magnitude beyond current limits.

desk verdict A solid, clearly-scoped vector-portal sensitivity grid for FCC-ee and muon colliders, with a real reproducibility gap in the limit-setting that could shift the headline contours. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09681 v1 pith:OMXLK6GN submitted 2024-12-12 hep-ph

Sagar Airen , Edward Broadberry , Gustavo Marques-Tavares , Lorenzo Ricci This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords vectorportaldarkphotonLμ−LτgaugebosonfutureleptoncollidersmuoncolliderFCC-eeinvisibledecaymissingenergysearches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how well the next generation of lepton colliders could discover weakly coupled vector portals ($Z'$ bosons) that connect the Standard Model to a dark sector. It focuses on the dark photon and the $L_\mu - L_\tau$ gauge boson, with masses from tens of GeV to a few TeV, considering both visible decays into Standard Model leptons and invisible decays into dark particles. Using the FCC-ee Z-pole and $ZH$ runs and a 3–10 TeV muon collider as benchmarks, the central result is that both machines would improve sensitivity to $L_\mu - L_\tau$ bosons, in both decay modes, and to invisibly decaying dark photons by one to two orders of magnitude across the relevant mass range. For invisibly decaying dark photons, the FCC-ee could reach the thermal-relic target for dark matter over most of the mass range. If these projections are realized, future lepton colliders would turn a broad, currently untested slice of vector-portal parameter space into accessible discovery territory.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three production channels computed with Monte Carlo simulation: associated production of the $Z'$ with a hard photon, where the photon energy $E_\gamma = (s - M_{Z'}^2)/(2\sqrt{s})$ reconstructs the mediator mass; $Z'$-bremsstrahlung from muons in $\mu^+\mu^-$ scattering, which is enhanced in the forward region and is analyzed with forward muon detectors using the muon-pair transverse momentum $p_T^{\mu\mu}$; and exotic $Z$ decays $Z \to \mu^+\mu^- Z'$ at the FCC-ee Z pole. The sensitivity projections are obtained by applying baseline lepton cuts, reconstructing the mediator mass either from the photon energy or from a missing invariant mass, and computing 95% confidence-level exclusions over the Standard Model backgrounds. A key technical element is the smearing relation $\Delta M_{Z'}^{\rm recon}/M_{Z'}^{\rm recon} \sim (s/(2M_{Z'}^2))\,\Delta E_\gamma/E_\gamma$, which controls how much detector resolution matters at low $M_{Z'}$.

What would settle it

Run the FCC-ee Z-pole and ZH stages at design luminosity and compare the observed mono-photon and exotic-$Z$ constraints with the paper's projected 95% exclusion lines; if the measured limit on the kinetic mixing $\epsilon$ is appreciably weaker than the projected line, the assumed photon-energy resolution or background model is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that future lepton colliders can probe vector-portal parameter space far beyond existing bounds. For an invisibly decaying dark photon, the FCC-ee's dominant channel is associated production with a photon, $e^+e^- \to Z'\gamma$ with $Z' \to$ invisible, and the reconstruction of $M_{Z'}$ from the photon energy; at the Z pole, exotic decays $Z \to \mu^+\mu^- Z'$ extend the reach to light masses. For the $L_\mu - L_\tau$ boson, the muon collider is the natural probe because the new force couples directly to muons, and both associated production and $Z'$-bremsstrahlung in $\mu^+\mu^-$ scattering contribute; the FCC-ee probes masses below $M_Z$ through exotic $Z$ decays. The paper reports 95% confidence-level projections in which these channels improve on current leading constraints—LEP mono-photon searches for invisible dark photons, neutrino trident production for $L_\mu - L_\tau$, and LHC dilepton and 4-muon searches for visible decays—by one to two orders of magnitude in the relevant coupling. It also finds that forward muon detectors at the muon collider yield only marginal gains, because missing-invariant-mass reconstruction is poor for light $Z'$ bosons.

Load-bearing premise

The projections assume the benchmark luminosities and detector resolutions quoted from the design reports, such as 4% photon energy resolution at FCC-ee and a forward muon detector with 10% energy resolution and 5 mrad angular resolution, and if any of those are not achieved, the claimed improvements shrink.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For invisibly decaying dark photons, the FCC-ee would probe kinetic mixing $\epsilon$ down to the thermal-relic target for pseudo-Dirac dark matter over most of the 10 GeV to hundreds-of-GeV mass range.
  • For $L_\mu - L_\tau$ bosons, the FCC-ee improves sensitivity below $M_Z$ and the muon collider extends reach to TeV masses, together surpassing current bounds by more than an order of magnitude for both visible and invisible decays.
  • The muon collider's forward muon detectors add only a mild improvement, so the main discovery potential is already captured by the central detector.
  • Because the results depend only on the electron and muon charges of the new vector, they transfer directly to any leptophilic $Z'$ portal, not just the two benchmark models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If FCC-ee reaches the thermal-relic line and observes nothing, the absence would disfavor pseudo-Dirac dark matter coupled through a dark photon in that mass window, since the projected reach is designed to cover the relic target.
  • The mass-smearing relation implies that improving the FCC-ee calorimeter's photon energy resolution may be more valuable for low-mass dark photons than increasing luminosity.
  • The same strategy could be applied to other electron-positron machines running at similar energies; their reach would track their assumed luminosity and detector resolution rather than the machine's center-of-mass energy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents projected sensitivities of future lepton colliders—a 3/10 TeV muon collider and the FCC-ee Z-pole and ZH runs—to two weakly coupled vector portals: the dark photon and the L_mu-L_tau gauge boson. Both visible decays into muon pairs and invisible decays into missing energy are considered, using leading-order MadGraph5+Pythia8+Delphes simulations with simple cut-based selections. The channels include associated production with a photon, Z'-bremsstrahlung from muons, and exotic Z decays. The central claims are that future colliders improve sensitivity to L_mu-L_tau bosons and invisibly decaying dark photons by 1--2 orders of magnitude over existing constraints, and that FCC-ee can reach the dark-matter thermal-relic target for most of the relevant mass range for the invisible dark photon. The paper also examines the impact of forward muon detectors at the muon collider, finding only marginal gains.

Significance. If the projections are reliable, the paper provides a useful, reasonably comprehensive map of future lepton-collider sensitivity to vector portals, complementing existing LHC and low-energy probes. Its strengths are that it treats both visible and invisible decays, compares two collider concepts and multiple production channels, and anchors its projections to external constraints (LEP, LHC, EWPT, CCFR) without circularity. The paper is also transparent about several detector-performance assumptions. However, the quantitative reach claims rest on a simplified simulation framework whose statistical and systematic treatment is not fully specified; given that the claimed improvements are large (1--2 orders of magnitude), the missing limit-setting details are load-bearing for the main conclusions.

major comments (4)
  1. [Secs. 3.1, 3.2 and Fig. 6] The 95% CL sensitivity contours are derived from event counts but the paper never states the limit-setting recipe: there is no likelihood or CLs formula, no binning, no treatment of background uncertainties, and no systematic uncertainties. At FCC-ee luminosities (e.g., 6e12 Z bosons, 5 ab^-1) the statistical error on the dominant backgrounds (gamma nu nu for mono-photon, Z->tau tau for exotic Z decays) is sub-percent, so the exclusion is controlled by background normalization and shape. A few-percent uncertainty on the photon energy scale or background rate can shift the contours by an amount comparable to the claimed 1--2 orders of magnitude, and the statement that the FCC-ee dark-photon bound crosses the thermal-relic line (Sec. 5.1) is precisely the kind of claim that can flip under such shifts. Please specify the statistical procedure and quantify the effect of realistic systematic uncertainties on the projected contours.
  2. [Sec. 3.2] The selection windows for FCC-ee associated production are introduced as '|M_recon - MZ'| < (40 GeV/MZ')^2 8 GeV' and similar, with the text stating only 'We have chosen these values based on Eq. (3.2) and checked its consistency numerically.' The paper does not report how these windows were optimized or scanned, nor the resulting signal and background efficiencies as functions of MZ'. Without this information the contours in Fig. 6 cannot be reproduced, and the sensitivity loss at low masses depends directly on these choices. Please provide the cut-scan procedure and the efficiency tables.
  3. [Sec. 3.1] In the Z'-bremsstrahlung analysis the only stated discriminator after baseline cuts is a minimum transverse momentum of the muon pair, pT(mu+mu-) > 50 GeV, with the text adding that the cut is 'optimized over the MZ' range' without giving the optimized values or the optimization criterion. This matters because the conclusion that forward muon detectors give only minimal improvement depends directly on the pT distribution and the chosen cut. Please report the scan, the resulting pT thresholds as a function of MZ', and the corresponding signal/background acceptances.
  4. [Secs. 3.1, 3.2 and footnote 4] All projections are leading order and omit initial-state radiation; the paper acknowledges this in footnote 4 and argues that ISR events are excluded by the selection criteria. However, for the mono-photon channel at FCC-ee and the associated-production channel at the muon collider, both signal and background are sensitive to QED radiation near thresholds, and the claimed order-of-magnitude improvements rely on precise acceptance calculations. The paper should provide at least an estimate of the size of missing higher-order/ISR corrections to the projected contours, especially for low MZ' values where Eq. (3.2) amplifies energy smearing.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] Several mechanical typos appear: 'T able 1' and 'T able 2' in the text, 'the electric charge of the election' in Sec. 2.1, 'as a function M recon' missing 'of' in the Fig. 2 caption, and 'out work' in footnote 4. These should be corrected.
  2. [Appendix A] The text says 'we show the 30 TeV CoM energy projections' for invisibly decaying dark photons, but Table 1 and the main text only define 3 and 10 TeV benchmarks. Please clarify whether this is a new benchmark or a typo.
  3. [Sec. 5.1] The thermal-relic target line is defined for fermionic dark matter with m_chi = MZ'/3 and alpha_D = 0.1, and the text notes the dependence on m_chi/MZ'. It would be helpful to state explicitly in the caption of Fig. 6 and in Sec. 5.1 that the 'reaches the thermal relic target' claim refers to this specific benchmark, not to the full model space.
  4. [Sec. 3.2] For the exotic Z-decay analysis the text mentions that the invisible width of the Z' is assumed to be smaller than the experimental MIM spread, corresponding to widths of up to ~5-10%. This assumption should be stated in the model section as well, since it effectively constraints the product gD^2 for the considered parameter range.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sensitivity projections are self-contained Monte Carlo estimates; the one overlapping-author citation is peripheral.

full rationale

The claimed predictions—the 1–2 order-of-magnitude improvements and the FCC-ee thermal-relic reach—are outputs of a LO MadGraph+Pythia event-generation pipeline with baseline detector assumptions (Table 1), not quantities fitted to the target result. Signal and background cross sections are computed from the model Lagrangians (Eqs. (2.2), (2.4)) and then counted in kinematic windows; the epsilon/gZ' values on the exclusion contours are the inputs being scanned, not parameters tuned to reproduce the reach. Mass reconstruction uses the two-body relation Eq. (3.1), and the window sizes (Secs. 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 4.2) are chosen from detector resolution and checked numerically; this is standard cut-based analysis, not a self-consistent definition of the signal. The external inputs (luminosities, 4% photon resolution, forward-muon 10% energy resolution and 5 mrad angular resolution, 0.1% muon momentum smearing) are taken from design reports and prior phenomenological studies ([1], [16], [34]); they are assumptions that could be optimistic, but that is a robustness/correctness concern, not circularity. The only citation with overlapping authorship is [49] in Sec. 2.2, listed among existing L_mu-L_tau probes; it is not load-bearing for the paper's own projections. The paper itself flags limitations: footnote 4 acknowledges "Our simulations do not include Initial State Radiation showering... A more refined analysis, including a detailed treatment of the radiative corrections, is beyond the scope of our work," and footnote 2 declares "This approximation breaks down in a tiny region of a few GeV around MZ' = MZ. That window is not to be considered reliable in our sensitivity projections." These affect precision but do not make the derivation circular. The skeptic's objection that no full likelihood or systematic uncertainties are stated (Secs. 3.1, 3.2) is a reproducibility and robustness limitation, not a circular reduction: the contours are still derived from generated event counts rather than assumed from the conclusion. No step in the derivation chain is equivalent to its inputs by construction, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central projections rest on externally supplied collider benchmarks, detector resolutions, and leading-order event simulation; none of these are derived in the paper, and several are choices that could change the reach if revised.

free parameters (4)
  • Collider luminosity benchmarks = muC: 0.9/ab (3 TeV), 10/ab (10 TeV); FCC-ee: 6e12 Z (Z-pole), 5/ab (ZH)
    Assumed inputs from design reports and Eq. (1.2); sensitivity scales directly with luminosity, so these are load-bearing choices.
  • Photon energy resolution at FCC-ee = 4%
    Used to reconstruct Z' mass in associated production (Sec. 3.2); chosen from expected CLD calorimeter performance. The paper notes strong dependence on this for light masses.
  • Forward muon detector parameters = 10% energy resolution, 5 mrad angular resolution, |eta| 2.5-7, 500 GeV muon energy threshold
    Assumed for the forward detector study (Sec. 3.1); variations shown only for angular resolution in App. A.
  • Selection window sizes = 50 GeV di-muon window at muC; FCC-ee windows (40 GeV/MZ')^2*8 GeV and (50 GeV/MZ')^2*20 GeV; pT(mu+mu-) > 50 GeV
    Chosen to optimize sensitivity; not derived from first principles. Different windows would change the projected reach.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Leading-order MadGraph5 + Pythia8 + Delphes3 simulations accurately model signal and background rates after cuts.
    All limits derive from this simulation chain (Sec. 3.1); no validation with data or higher-order cross-checks is provided.
  • domain assumption Initial-state radiation from muons is negligible after selection cuts.
    Footnote 4 in Sec. 3.1 states no ISR is simulated due to lack of muon PDFs; this could affect low-pT processes.
  • domain assumption The invisible Z' width is smaller than the experimental resolution of the missing invariant mass.
    Sec. 3.2 exotic Z decay analysis assumes this; the paper notes it corresponds to widths up to about 10% for light masses.
  • domain assumption The L_mu-L_tau boson has no electron coupling, and the dark photon mixing parameter is small enough that the interaction in Eq. (2.3) applies.
    This defines which production channels exist for each model (Sec. 2); the L_mu-L_tau e+e- associated production is absent by construction.
  • domain assumption The gauge current is non-anomalous, so no Wess-Zumino term or dark-sector assumptions are needed.
    Stated in Sec. 2; otherwise additional terms could change production and decay.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vector Portals at Future Lepton Colliders." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OMXLK6GN

@misc{pith2026241209681,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vector Portals at Future Lepton Colliders},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OMXLK6GN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09681}
}
abstract

We assess the sensitivity of future lepton colliders to weakly coupled vector dark portals (aka ``$ Z' $ bosons'') with masses ranging from tens of GeV to a few TeV. Our analysis focuses on dark photons and $ L_{\mu} - L_{\tau} $ gauge bosons. We consider both visible and invisible decay channels. We demonstrate that both high energy $\mu$ colliders and future $ e^+e^- $ colliders, using the FCC-ee $Z$-pole and $ZH$ operation modes as a benchmark, offer significant improvements in sensitivity. We find that both colliders can enhance the sensitivity to $ L_{\mu} - L_{\tau} $ bosons (for both visible and invisible decays) and to invisibly decaying dark photons by 1--2 orders of magnitude across the relevant mass range. Furthermore, we study the impact of forward $ \mu $ detectors at the $ \mu $-collider on the sensitivity to both models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Constraining the heavy leptophilic neutral gauge bosons through the $Z\to\ell^+\ell^-$, $W^\pm\to\ell^\pm\nu_\ell$, and $h\to\ell^+\ell^-$ decays

    hep-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    One-loop corrections to W/Z/h leptonic widths exclude heavy leptophilic Z' regions (M ≳ O(1) TeV, g' ≳ 0.4) beyond LEP-2 and neutrino-trident limits.

  2. The Sound of Dark Sectors in Pulsar Timing Arrays

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A dark sector phase transition at the MeV scale, with a dark Higgs mass around 3 MeV, can reproduce the gravitational wave background seen by pulsar timing arrays.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Abada et al., FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2 , Eur

    FCC collaboration, A. Abada et al., FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2 , Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 (2019) 261

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Dong et al., CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector , 1811.10545

    CEPC Study Groupcollaboration, M. Dong et al., CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 - Physics & Detector , 1811.10545

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 1: Executive Summary , 1306.6327

    arXiv

  4. [4]

    Vernieri et al., Strategy for Understanding the Higgs Physics: The Cool Copper Collider , JINST 18 (2023) P07053 [ 2203.07646]

    C. Vernieri et al., Strategy for Understanding the Higgs Physics: The Cool Copper Collider , JINST 18 (2023) P07053 [ 2203.07646]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    CLIC, CLICdpcollaboration, The Compact Linear e +e− Collider (CLIC): Physics Potential , 1812.07986

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Accettura et al., Towards a Muon Collider , 2303.08533

    C. Accettura et al., Towards a Muon Collider , 2303.08533. – 17 –

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Abada et al., FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3 , Eur

    FCC collaboration, A. Abada et al., FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 3 , Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 (2019) 755

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Ahmad et al., CEPC-SPPC Preliminary Conceptual Design Report

    M. Ahmad et al., CEPC-SPPC Preliminary Conceptual Design Report. 1. Physics and Detector,

    work page

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Abada et al., FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1 , Eur

    FCC collaboration, A. Abada et al., FCC Physics Opportunities: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 1 , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 474

    2019

  2. [10]

    Alexander et al., Dark Sectors 2016 Workshop: Community Report , 8, 2016, 1608.08632

    J. Alexander et al., Dark Sectors 2016 Workshop: Community Report , 8, 2016, 1608.08632

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Battaglieri et al., US Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter 2017: Community Report , in U.S

    M. Battaglieri et al., US Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter 2017: Community Report , in U.S. Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter , 7, 2017, 1707.04591

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Buttazzo, D

    D. Buttazzo, D. Redigolo, F. Sala and A. Tesi, Fusing Vectors into Scalars at High Energy Lepton Colliders , JHEP 11 (2018) 144 [ 1807.04743]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Ruhdorfer, E

    M. Ruhdorfer, E. Salvioni and A. Weiler, A Global View of the Off-Shell Higgs Portal , SciPost Phys. 8 (2020) 027 [ 1910.04170]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Chacko, Y

    Z. Chacko, Y. Cui and S. Hong, Exploring a Dark Sector Through the Higgs Portal at a Lepton Collider, Phys. Lett. B 732 (2014) 75 [ 1311.3306]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Ruhdorfer, E

    M. Ruhdorfer, E. Salvioni and A. Wulzer, Why detect forward muons at a muon collider , 2411.00096

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Ruhdorfer, E

    M. Ruhdorfer, E. Salvioni and A. Wulzer, Invisible Higgs boson decay from forward muons at a muon collider , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 095038 [ 2303.14202]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Forslund and P

    M. Forslund and P. Meade, Precision Higgs Width and Couplings with a High Energy Muon Collider, 2308.02633

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    P. Li, Z. Liu and K.-F. Lyu, Higgs boson width and couplings at high energy muon colliders with forward muon detection , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 073009 [ 2401.08756]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Liu, L.-T

    J. Liu, L.-T. Wang, X.-P. Wang and W. Xue, Exposing the dark sector with future Z factories , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095044 [ 1712.07237]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    T. Han, Z. Liu, L.-T. Wang and X. Wang, WIMPs at High Energy Muon Colliders , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 075004 [ 2009.11287]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bottaro, D

    S. Bottaro, D. Buttazzo, M. Costa, R. Franceschini, P. Panci, D. Redigolo et al., Closing the window on WIMP Dark Matter , Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 31 [ 2107.09688]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Asadi, A

    P. Asadi, A. Radick and T.-T. Yu, A Duet of Freeze-in and Freeze-out: Lepton-Flavored Dark Matter and Muon Colliders , 2312.03826

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Cesarotti and G

    C. Cesarotti and G. Krnjaic, Hitting the Thermal Target for Leptophilic Dark Matter , 2404.02906

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Capdevilla, F

    R. Capdevilla, F. Meloni, R. Simoniello and J. Zurita, Hunting wino and higgsino dark matter at the muon collider with disappearing tracks , JHEP 06 (2021) 133 [ 2102.11292]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Capdevilla, F

    R. Capdevilla, F. Meloni and J. Zurita, Discovering Electroweak Interacting Dark Matter at Muon Colliders using Soft Tracks , 2405.08858

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Franceschini and X

    R. Franceschini and X. Zhao, Going all the way in the search for WIMP dark matter at the muon collider through precision measurements , Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 552 [ 2212.11900]. – 18 –

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Banerjee, P

    S. Banerjee, P. S. B. Dev, A. Ibarra, T. Mandal and M. Mitra, Prospects of Heavy Neutrino Searches at Future Lepton Colliders , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 075002 [ 1503.05491]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Chakraborty, H

    I. Chakraborty, H. Roy and T. Srivastava, Searches for heavy neutrinos at multi-TeV muon collider: a resonant leptogenesis perspective , Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 280 [ 2206.07037]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    P. Li, Z. Liu and K.-F. Lyu, Heavy neutral leptons at muon colliders , JHEP 03 (2023) 231 [2301.07117]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    A. K. Barik, S. K. Rai and A. Srivastava, Discovering an invisible Z’ at the muon collider , 2408.14396

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Karliner, M

    M. Karliner, M. Low, J. L. Rosner and L.-T. Wang, Radiative return capabilities of a high-energy, high-luminosity e+e− collider, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 035010 [ 1503.07209]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Dasgupta, P

    A. Dasgupta, P. S. B. Dev, T. Han, R. Padhan, S. Wang and K. Xie, Searching for heavy leptophilic Z’: from lepton colliders to gravitational waves , JHEP 12 (2023) 011 [ 2308.12804]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    P. J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, LEP Shines Light on Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 014028 [ 1103.0240]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Accettura et al., Interim report for the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC) , 2407.12450

    International Muon Collidercollaboration, C. Accettura et al., Interim report for the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC) , 2407.12450

  27. [35]

    J. A. Dror, R. Lasenby and M. Pospelov, New constraints on light vectors coupled to anomalous currents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 141803 [ 1705.06726]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Di Luzio, M

    L. Di Luzio, M. Nardecchia and C. Toni, Light vectors coupled to anomalous currents with harmless Wess-Zumino terms , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 115042 [ 2204.05945]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Graham, C

    M. Graham, C. Hearty and M. Williams, Searches for Dark Photons at Accelerators , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71 (2021) 37 [ 2104.10280]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Curtin, R

    D. Curtin, R. Essig, S. Gori and J. Shelton, Illuminating Dark Photons with High-Energy Colliders, JHEP 02 (2015) 157 [ 1412.0018]

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Harigaya, E

    K. Harigaya, E. Petrosky and A. Pierce, Precision Electroweak Tensions and a Dark Photon , 2307.13045

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Aad et al., Search for dark matter in association with an energetic photon in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 02 (2021) 226 [2011.05259]

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for dark matter in association with an energetic photon in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector , JHEP 02 (2021) 226 [2011.05259]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    CMS collaboration, A. Tumasyan et al., Search for new particles in events with energetic jets and large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV , JHEP 11 (2021) 153 [ 2107.13021]

    2021 arXiv

  34. [42]

    S. Chen, A. Glioti, R. Rattazzi, L. Ricci and A. Wulzer, Learning from radiation at a very high energy lepton collider , JHEP 05 (2022) 180 [ 2202.10509]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Cesarotti, S

    C. Cesarotti, S. Homiller, R. K. Mishra and M. Reece, Probing New Gauge Forces with a High-Energy Muon Beam Dump , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 071803 [ 2202.12302]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Aaij et al., Search for A′ → µ+µ− Decays, Phys

    LHCb collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Search for A′ → µ+µ− Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 041801 [1910.06926]. – 19 –

    2020

  37. [45]

    Hayrapetyan et al., Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment , 2405.13778

    CMS collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al., Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment , 2405.13778

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for resonant and nonresonant new phenomena in high-mass dilepton final states at √s = 13 TeV , JHEP 07 (2021) 208 [ 2103.02708]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Ekhterachian, A

    M. Ekhterachian, A. Hook, S. Kumar and Y. Tsai, Bounds on gauge bosons coupled to nonconserved currents, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 035034 [ 2103.13396]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Harnik, J

    R. Harnik, J. Kopp and P. A. N. Machado, Exploring nu Signals in Dark Matter Detectors , JCAP 07 (2012) 026 [ 1202.6073]

    2012 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Agashe, S

    K. Agashe, S. Airen, R. Franceschini, D. Kim, A. V. Kotwal, L. Ricci et al., A new purpose for the W -boson mass measurement: searching for New Physics in lepton+ M ET, 2310.13687

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Y. Fei, P. Li, Z. Liu, K.-F. Lyu and M. Pospelov, W -Boson Exotic Decay into Three Charged Leptons at the LHC , 2407.15930

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    Krnjaic, G

    G. Krnjaic, G. Marques-Tavares, D. Redigolo and K. Tobioka, Probing Muonphilic Force Carriers and Dark Matter at Kaon Factories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 041802 [1902.07715]

    2020 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Altmannshofer, S

    W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov and I. Yavin, Neutrino Trident Production: A Powerful Probe of New Physics with Neutrino Beams , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 091801 [ 1406.2332]

    2014 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Aad et al., Search for a new Z’ gauge boson in 4µ events with the ATLAS experiment, JHEP 07 (2023) 090 [ 2301.09342]

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for a new Z’ gauge boson in 4µ events with the ATLAS experiment, JHEP 07 (2023) 090 [ 2301.09342]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al., Search for an Lµ − Lτ gauge boson using Z → 4µ events in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 792 (2019) 345 [ 1808.03684]

    2019 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Alwall, M

    J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, Madgraph 5: going beyond , Journal of High Energy Physics 2011 (2011)

    2011

  48. [56]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten et al., An introduction to pythia 8.2 , Computer Physics Communications 191 (2015) 159–177

    2015

  49. [57]

    de Favereau, C

    J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lema ˆ ıtre, A. Mertens et al., Delphes 3: a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment , Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 (2014)

    2014

  50. [58]

    Carrillo Gonz´ alez and N

    M. Carrillo Gonz´ alez and N. Toro,Cosmology and signals of light pseudo-Dirac dark matter , JHEP 04 (2022) 060 [ 2108.13422]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [59]

    de Blas, Y

    J. de Blas, Y. Du, C. Grojean, J. Gu, V. Miralles, M. E. Peskin et al., Global SMEFT Fits at Future Colliders, in Snowmass 2021 , 6, 2022, 2206.08326. – 20 –

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.