Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Africanus III. pfb-imaging -- a flexible radio interferometric imaging suite

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A flexible imaging suite makes sparsity-based radio deconvolution practical on terabyte-scale data.

desk verdict A useful, honest software paper whose main acceleration heuristic is openly acknowledged as unproven — worth refereeing for the community, with claims about convergence and automated noise calibration tempered. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10073 v2 pith:Z4U6AEB7 submitted 2024-12-13 astro-ph.IM

Hertzog L. Bester , Jonathan S. Kenyon , Audrey Repetti , Simon J. Perkins , Oleg M. Smirnov , Tariq Blecher , Yassine Mhiri , Jakob Roth
show 3 more authors
Ian Heywood Yves Wiaux Benjamin V. Hugo
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords radiointerferometrysparsity-basedimagingSARApreconditionedforward-backwardMeerKATCLEANcloudcomputingbigdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces pfb-imaging, a software suite for building and accelerating radio interferometric imaging algorithms, and demonstrates it by implementing an unconstrained version of the SARA sparsity-based reconstruction. The central claim is that this implementation scales with image size rather than visibility data volume, and that its algorithmic parameters are interpretable, reducing user tuning to essentially one threshold parameter. The claim is validated on terabyte-sized MeerKAT observations, run on a single compute node and on cloud instances, producing restored images comparable to or better than the standard CLEAN-based approach on fields with extended emission.

What carries the argument

The central object is the preconditioned forward-backward (PFB) algorithm, which alternates a forward gradient step preconditioned by a Hermitian positive-definite operator with a backward proximal step that enforces the regularizer. The practical enablers are the conversion of the measurement equation into Stokes visibilities, which removes the need to reapply gains at each iteration and makes aggressive averaging possible; the preconditioner U_Z built from the absolute value of the PSF plus a small identity term, which approximates the Hessian and allows near-unity step sizes; and a reweighted-L1 implementation of the log-sum prior whose threshold parameter is set automatically from an estimated noise level in the sampling-density-corrected residual.

What would settle it

Run pfb-imaging's sara application on a MeerKAT observation with sparse uv-coverage dominated by bright unresolved point sources (for example, a short snapshot observation), keeping the default gamma=0.99 and eta=1e-4. If the preconditioned forward-backward iterations diverge or the automatically estimated sigma_rms deviates strongly from the measured noise in the final residual, the heuristic U_Z preconditioner is not a safe general default.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper argues that the long-standing gap between CLEAN and more principled optimization-based imaging algorithms is not fundamental, and that a carefully engineered preconditioned forward-backward framework can close it. The discovery is that by transforming raw visibilities into Stokes visibilities that absorb the instrument gains, then preconditioning the forward step with a curvature-like operator built from the point spread function and gridded weights, a sparsity-promoting log-sum regularizer (unconstrained SARA) runs at a cost dominated by the image size, not the data volume. On real MeerKAT data the method reconstructs diffuse emission more faithfully than multi-scale CLEAN while giving comparable restored images, at roughly twice the wall-clock time and using only commodity hardware.

Load-bearing premise

The whole acceleration scheme relies on the heuristic preconditioner U_Z, which takes the absolute value of the point spread function and is assumed to be a valid majorizing metric for the forward-backward algorithm; the paper openly states that it has no theoretical justification for this choice and that it simply appears to work in practice.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, astronomers can run sparsity-based imaging on SKA-era data volumes without a dedicated HPC cluster, since the algorithm scales with image size and runs on cloud CPUs.
  • The single interpretable parameter (rho_rms) lowers the barrier to adopting non-CLEAN algorithms in automated processing pipelines.
  • Because the framework is largely agnostic to the regularizer, the same preconditioning and data products can accelerate other priors, such as total variation or low-rank models, as well as self-calibration and mosaicing workflows.
  • The transfer of the same recipe from one MeerKAT field to a separate Sagittarius A* observation suggests the recipes generalize without per-field tuning, which is what an automated pipeline needs.
  • The demonstrated ability to run only the compute-intensive grid and deconvolution steps on cloud instances, while keeping the component model small (under 1 GB), enables offloading and reproducible reduction on commodity platforms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's own comparison shows model images differ drastically between CLEAN and SARA while restored images agree; an implicit consequence is that scientific conclusions drawn from restored images are currently the safe common ground, whereas model-image morphology claims should wait for better uncertainty quantification.
  • The heuristic U_Z preconditioner, if it fails on more extreme uv-coverage (for example, sparse arrays or very wide fields), would break the automatic noise-level estimation; an extension is to benchmark U_Z against the more expensive U_R on a range of array configurations.
  • Because the noise-level estimate relies on the residual becoming noise-like late in the optimization, prematurely triggering L1-reweighting is a known failure mode; an extension would trigger reweighting based on a statistical test of residual whiteness rather than a fixed iteration count.
  • The claim that computational cost scales with image size rather than data volume holds only after the initial Stokes-visibility averaging; the data ingestion step still reads the full data, so for very large surveys the bottleneck shifts to data transformation and input/output.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces pfb-imaging, a Python/Dask library for radio interferometric imaging built around a preconditioned forward-backward (PFB) optimization framework. It derives a Stokes-visibility preprocessing step, proposes two preconditioners (U_R and U_Z), implements a SARA-type sparsity regularizer with automated hyperparameter selection based on residual-image statistics, and reports real-data validation on terabyte-scale MeerKAT observations of ESO137 and SGRA, including a comparison with WSClean and a distributed AWS deployment. The central claims are that the framework is flexible, that the SARA implementation scales with image size rather than data volume, and that its algorithmic parameters are interpretable.

Significance. If the claims hold, pfb-imaging would be a valuable open-source contribution to radio interferometric imaging, lowering the barrier for developing and testing sparsity-based algorithms on large datasets. The paper's strengths include a clean derivation of the measurement model in Section 2, a detailed and reproducible software architecture with versioned Stimela2 recipes, benchmarks against WSClean on public MeerKAT data, and an honest discussion of residual systematics. The main weakness is that the convergence and hyperparameter-interpretability claims rest partly on an explicitly heuristic preconditioner (U_Z in Eq. 28) that is not proven to satisfy the majorization condition required by the cited PFB theory, and the real-data validation does not isolate this preconditioner's effect.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (28)] The preconditioner U_Z = Z^T F^T |\hat I_PSF| F Z + \eta I is presented as a majorizing metric for the PFB algorithm, but the paper explicitly states that no theoretical justification is available for the absolute value. For the Repetti-Wiaux convergence guarantee cited in §3.1, each U_k must satisfy the majorization inequality (24); for the quadratic f in Eq. (15), this is equivalent to requiring U >= A. The text fixes gamma = 0.99 with no backtracking and does not verify whether (24) holds for U_Z on the tested observations. Consequently, the statement in §5.4 that the SARA algorithm 'enjoys convergence guarantees' is not established by the present analysis. Please either provide a proof that |\hat I_PSF| majorizes the Hessian, add a backtracking procedure that enforces (24) and report its behavior, or explicitly restrict the convergence claim to the non-preconditioned case and treat U_Z as a heuristic acceleration.
  2. [§3.3, Eqs. (35)–(38)] The automated selection of sigma_rms and lambda relies on Eq. (36), which substitutes \tilde\delta = U^{-1} I_R for the density-corrected gradient \delta = A^{-1}\nabla f(x_k). This substitution is valid only to the extent that U_Z faithfully approximates A, and the heuristic nature of U_Z therefore propagates into the claimed SNR interpretation of the L1-weights (35) and the threshold parameter (38). The paper would be substantially strengthened by a synthetic-data experiment with a known ground-truth image, demonstrating that rho_rms = 1 indeed thresholds components at the noise level and that the final reconstruction is not sensitive to eta and gamma within the recommended ranges.
  3. [§5.2–§5.4] The validation on ESO137 and SGRA uses essentially the same default recipe parameters (rmsfactor = 1, eta = 1e-3, gamma = 0.99, positivity = 1) for both fields. This demonstrates end-to-end reproducibility and some generalization across L-band and UHF-band MeerKAT data, but it does not discriminate between a preconditioner that is generically valid and one that happens to work on these particular observations. Since the paper's practical case for U_Z rests on the statement that it 'seems to work well in practice', please add at least one comparison with an alternative preconditioner (e.g., U_R with aggressively averaged weights) or with a synthetic observation where the true sky is known, so that the effect of U_Z on convergence rate and reconstruction accuracy can be isolated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Author affiliations] The second affiliation contains a typo: 'Eatern Cape' should be 'Eastern Cape'.
  2. [§3.3, Eq. (36)] The notation \alpha_\delta in Eq. (36) is not introduced and is confusing; it would be clearer to write \alpha_i = g([\Psi^\dagger \delta]_i) and then define the standard deviation of the resulting vector.
  3. [§4.2.3 and §5.3] The text says the sara application is 'not currently distributed in any way', yet §5.3 describes running grid on multiple AWS instances while sara runs on a single large instance. Please clarify that the lack of distribution refers to the deconvolution solver itself, not to the surrounding workflow.
  4. [§3.3 and Appendix B.2] The paper claims that hyper-parameter specification 'boils down to setting the single parameter rho_rms', but the recipes in Appendix B.2 also require eta, l1-reweight-from, rmsfactor, pd-tol, pd-maxit, and a positivity flag. Please either state which parameters are intended as defaults that rarely need changing, or revise the claim to match the actual workflow.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SARA/PFB derivation rests on external algorithms and public-data benchmarks; the heuristic U_Z preconditioner is a correctness gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained and non-circular. The optimization framework (PFB, equations 23-25) is imported from the external Repetti and Wiaux (2021) work, and the SARA regulariser (equation 31) builds on Carrillo et al. (2012) and related external sparsity literature, neither of which is defined in terms of this paper's outputs. The heuristic preconditioner U_Z in equation (28) is admittedly not theoretically justified, but it is constructed from the PSF and data weights, not from the target image or from the convergence claim it supports; a failure to satisfy the majorization condition (24) would be a mathematical correctness or robustness gap, not a circular reduction. The automated choices of sigma_rms and lambda in equations (36) and (38) are internal algorithmic calibration mechanisms that give hyperparameters an intuitive interpretation; they are not fitted to a known ground-truth image and are not presented as independent predictions. Validation against WSClean on public MeerKAT data, including a separate SGRA field, provides external evidence, and the AWS reproducibility check compares against a locally produced result. Self-citations to the Africanus series and to Bester et al. (2021) concern software infrastructure and a related preconditioning idea rather than the load-bearing justification of the paper's central claim, and the implementation is open source and independently runnable. The main skeptical concern about U_Z not being proven to satisfy the PFB assumptions is therefore a correctness risk, not circularity, and does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard optimization theory, two domain-specific approximation assumptions, and one explicitly heuristic preconditioner. The free parameters are hand-tuned values that affect the demonstrated results but are not fitted to a ground-truth target. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • eta (preconditioner damping) = 1e-4 in Section 3.2 text; 1e-3 in Appendix B.2 recipe
    Chosen by hand to allow the forward step to nearly overfit the data; no sensitivity analysis provided.
  • gamma (fixed step-size bound) = 0.99
    Stated to work well for all results in Section 5; not derived from data or theory.
  • rho_rms (L1-reweighting aggressiveness) = 3.5, 2.0, and 1.0 across different runs
    User-specified threshold controlling the SNR level at which L1-weights become unity; interpreted intuitively but still a free parameter.
  • Briggs robustness parameter = -1, -0.5, -0.3, 0.5 at different stages
    Chosen per processing stage to balance resolution and sensitivity; affects all displayed images.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The preconditioned forward-backward algorithm of Repetti and Wiaux (2021) converges to a critical point of the objective when the forward operator is Lipschitz-differentiable and the regularizer has the prescribed composite form.
    Invoked in Section 3.1 as the theoretical basis for the optimization framework; the paper relies on this external convergence result.
  • domain assumption The measurement operator satisfies the consistency condition in Eq. (13), so that real and imaginary parts of inner products are invariant under adjoint.
    Assumed in Section 2.2 to enable the use of a single gridding operator for both forward and adjoint; standard for non-uniform FFT based operators.
  • domain assumption In the coplanar-array limit, the Hessian of the data-fidelity term is well approximated by a PSF convolution, as in Eq. (16).
    Used in Section 3.2 to construct the U_Z preconditioner; the paper notes errors grow outside this limit with distance from the field center.
  • domain assumption Discarding the off-diagonal entries of the Mueller weights assumes the Stokes parameters are statistically independent.
    Stated in Section 2.1; the paper acknowledges this may be detrimental for full-polarization imaging but proceeds for Stokes I.
  • ad hoc to paper The heuristic preconditioner U_Z = Z^T F^T |I_PSF| F Z + eta*I is a valid majorizing metric that accelerates convergence.
    Introduced in Eq. (28) with the explicit admission that there is no good theoretical justification for the absolute value; the practical performance is relied upon for all results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Africanus III. pfb-imaging -- a flexible radio interferometric imaging suite." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z4U6AEB7

@misc{pith2026241210073,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Africanus III. pfb-imaging -- a flexible radio interferometric imaging suite},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z4U6AEB7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10073}
}
read the original abstract

The popularity of the CLEAN algorithm in radio interferometric imaging stems from its maturity, speed, and robustness. While many alternatives have been proposed in the literature, none have achieved mainstream adoption by astronomers working with data from interferometric arrays operating in the big data regime. This lack of adoption is largely due to increased computational complexity, absence of mature implementations, and the need for astronomers to tune obscure algorithmic parameters. This work introduces pfb-imaging: a flexible library that implements the scaffolding required to develop and accelerate general radio interferometric imaging algorithms. We demonstrate how the framework can be used to implement a sparsity-based image reconstruction technique known as (unconstrained) SARA in a way that scales with image size rather than data volume and features interpretable algorithmic parameters. The implementation is validated on terabyte-sized data from the MeerKAT telescope, using both a single compute node and Amazon Web Services computing instances.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10073 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sum of the weights 𝑤sum as a function of baseline length |𝑏|. The image on the left corresponds to the weights accumulated in each bin under natural weighting. It is difficult to assign error bars to each bin because the weights have been accumulated without normalising by the sum of the weights. The image on the right corresponds to uniform weighting. The error bars show the standard deviation after taking the weig… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Different form of thresholding. Left - hard thresholding. Right - soft thresholding. Middle - the thresholding operation corresponding to minimising the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The XArray representation of pfb-imaging’s model format. with the result, and adding the residuals back in. The process is necessitated by the fact that model images, especially those produced by variants of the CLEAN algorithm, tend to be non￾physical and, by virtue of being point estimates, do not account for any uncertainty in the reconstruction. Since a convolution with a Gaussian effectively down-weights long b… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison between pfb-imaging (left) and WSClean (right) on the ESO137 field after the final round of self-calibration. Top panel shows scale matched model images in log scale. The bottom panel shows scale matched residual images in linear scale. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between pfb-imaging (left) and WSClean (right) of the main central source ESO137-006. Top panel shows scale matched model images in log scale. The bottom panel shows scale matched restored images also in log scale. Images are highly saturated to highlight di…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison between pfb-imaging (left) and WSClean (right) for the source ESO137-007. The top panel shows scale matched model images in log scale. The bottom panel shows scaled matched restored images also in log scale. Images are highly saturated to highlight differenc…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: pfb-imaging results produced on AWS on a subset of the ESO137 field. The top panel shows the model image on the left and the restored image on the right, both in log scale. Bottom panel shows the residual image on the left and the approximate sampling density corrected…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison between pfb-imaging (left) and WSClean (right) on the SGRA field before commencing self-calibration. Top panel shows scale matched restored images in log scale. The bottom panel shows scale matched residual images in linear scale. 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figure…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Africanus I. Scalable, distributed and efficient radio data processing with Dask-MS and Codex Africanus

    astro-ph.IM 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dask-MS and Codex Africanus let radio astronomers run interferometry data reduction on Dask clusters, with demonstrated strong and weak scaling for a DFT model predict on AWS.

  2. Africanus IV. The Stimela2 framework: scalable and reproducible workflows, from local to cloud compute

    astro-ph.IM 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Stimela2 introduces a YAML-based workflow framework that combines readable linear recipes with containerization and Kubernetes or Slurm backends for reproducible, scalable radio astronomy data reduction.

  3. Africanus II. QuartiCal: calibrating radio interferometer data at scale using Numba and Dask

    astro-ph.IM 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    QuartiCal, a new Python-based radio interferometry calibration package, supports arbitrary chains of gain terms and uses Dask to scale from a laptop to distributed cloud clusters, outperforming CubiCal in memory and speed.

  4. Commensal image plane transient search methods with the SKAO

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 accept novelty 3.5 of 10

    State-of-the-art pathfinder techniques for fast model-subtracted imaging, automated light-curve pipelines, artefact filtering and triggered reprocessing enable reliable commensal image-plane transient searches with SK...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  2. [2]

    Wideband Super-resolution Imaging in Radio Interferometry via Low Rankness and Joint Average Sparsity Models (HyperSARA)

    author Abdulaziz , A. , author Dabbech , A. , author Wiaux , Y. , year 2019 . title Wideband super-resolution imaging in Radio Interferometry via low rankness and joint average sparsity models (HyperSARA) . journal MNRAS volume 489 , pages 1230--1248 . :10.1093/mnras/stz2117, http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.04596 arXiv:1806.04596

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    , author Hamman , J

    author Abernathey , R.P. , author Hamman , J. , author Miles , A. , year 2018 . title Beyond netCDF: Cloud Native Climate Data with Zarr and XArray , in: booktitle AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts , pp. pages IN33A--06

    2018

  4. [4]

    , year 2019

    author Apache Software Foundation. , year 2019 . title Arrow: a cross-language development platform for in-memory data

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    , author Bester , H.L

    author Arras , P. , author Bester , H.L. , author Perley , R.A. , author Leike , R. , author Smirnov , O. , author Westermann , R. , author En lin , T.A. , year 2021 . title Comparison of classical and Bayesian imaging in radio interferometry. Cygnus A with CLEAN and resolve . journal A& A volume 646 , pages A84 . :10.1051/0004-6361/202039258

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039258 2021

  6. [6]

    , author Reinecke, M

    author Arras, P. , author Reinecke, M. , author Westermann, R. , author En in, T.A. , year 2021 . title Efficient wide-field radio interferometry response . journal A& A volume 646 , pages A58 . :10.1051/0004-6361/202039723

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039723 2021

  7. [7]

    Xova: Baseline-Dependent Time and Channel Averaging for Radio Interferometry

    author Atemkeng, M. , author Perkins, S. , author Kenyon, J. , author Hugo, B. , author Smirnov, O. , year 2021 . title Xova: Baseline-dependent time and channel averaging for radio interferometry . http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11270 arXiv:2101.11270

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    , author Magland , J.F

    author Barnett , A.H. , author Magland , J.F. , author Klinteberg , L.a. , year 2018 . title A parallel non-uniform fast Fourier transform library based on an ``exponential of semicircle'' kernel . journal arXiv e-prints , pages arXiv:1808.06736 http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.06736 arXiv:1808.06736

    arXiv 2018

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    , author Repetti , A

    author Bester , H.L. , author Repetti , A. , author Perkins , S. , author Smirnov , O.M. , author Kenyon , J.S. , year 2021 . title A practical preconditioner for wide-field continuum imaging of radio interferometric data . journal arXiv e-prints , pages arXiv:2101.08072 :10.4...

    2021 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    , year 2015

    author Brewer, E.A. , year 2015 . title Kubernetes and the path to cloud native , in: booktitle Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing , publisher Association for Computing Machinery , address New York, NY, USA . p. pages 167 . :10.1145/2806777.2809955

    2015

  3. [11]

    , year 1995

    author Briggs, D.S. , year 1995 . title High Fidelity Deconvolution of Moderately Resolved Sources . Ph.D. thesis. New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. address Socorro, New Mexico . note Ph.D. Dissertation

    1995

  4. [12]

    , author Pereyra , M

    author Cai , X. , author Pereyra , M. , author McEwen , J.D. , year 2018 . title Uncertainty quantification for radio interferometric imaging - I. Proximal MCMC methods . journal MNRAS volume 480 , pages 4154--4169 . :10.1093/mnras/sty2004, http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04818 arXi...

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    , author Wakin , M.B

    author Candes , E.J. , author Wakin , M.B. , author Boyd , S.P. , year 2007 . title Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted L1 Minimization . journal arXiv e-prints , pages arXiv:0711.1612 http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.1612 arXiv:0711.1612

    2007 arXiv

  6. [14]

    , author McEwen , J.D

    author Carrillo , R.E. , author McEwen , J.D. , author Wiaux , Y. , year 2012 . title Sparsity Averaging Reweighted Analysis (SARA): a novel algorithm for radio-interferometric imaging . journal MNRAS volume 426 , pages 1223--1234 . :10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21605.x, http://ar...

    2012

  7. [15]

    , year 2013

    author Condat, L. , year 2013 . title A primal-dual splitting method for convex optimization involving Lipschitzian, proximable and linear composite terms . journal Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications , pages online first, to appear :10.1007/s10957-012-0245-9

    2013 doi

  8. [16]

    , author Perley, R

    author Cornwell, T. , author Perley, R. , year 1992 . title Radio-interferometric imaging of very large fields-the problem of non-coplanar arrays . journal Astronomy and Astrophysics volume 261 , pages 353--364

    1992

  9. [17]

    , author Wilkinson, P

    author Cornwell, T. , author Wilkinson, P. , year 1981 . title A new method for making maps with unstable radio interferometers . journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society volume 196 , pages 1067--1086

    1981

  10. [18]

    , year 1988

    author Daubechies, I. , year 1988 . title Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets . journal Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics volume 41 , pages 909--996 . :10.1002/cpa.3160410705

    1988 doi

  11. [19]

    , author Chalmers , D

    author Di Francesco , J. , author Chalmers , D. , author Denman , N. , author Fissel , L. , author Friesen , R. , author Gaensler , B. , author Hlavacek-Larrondo , J. , author Kirk , H. , author Matthews , B. , author O'Dea , C. , author Robishaw , T. , author Rosolowsky , E. ...

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    , year 2003

    author Goldstein, D.H. , year 2003 . title Polarized Light . edition 2nd ed., publisher Marcel Dekker , address New York . note Chapter 3 covers Mueller calculus in detail

    2003

  13. [21]

    , author Ravi, V

    author Hallinan, G. , author Ravi, V. , author Weinreb, S. , author Kocz, J. , author Huang, Y. , author Woody, D.P. , author Lamb, J. , author D'Addario, L. , author Catha, M. , author Shi, J. , author Law, C. , author Kulkarni, S.R. , author Phinney, E.S. , author Eastwood, ...

    2019 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    , author Bregman , J.D

    author Hamaker , J.P. , author Bregman , J.D. , author Sault , R.J. , year 1996 . title Understanding radio polarimetry. I. Mathematical foundations. journal A& As volume 117 , pages 137--147

    1996

  15. [23]

    , author Millman, K.J

    author Harris, C.R. , author Millman, K.J. , author van der Walt, S.J. , author Gommers, R. , author Virtanen, P. , author Cournapeau, D. , author Wieser, E. , author Taylor, J. , author Berg, S. , author Smith, N.J. , author Kern, R. , author Picus, M. , author Hoyer, S. , au...

    2020

  16. [24]

    , year 1974

    author H \"o gbom , J.A. , year 1974 . title Aperture Synthesis with a Non-Regular Distribution of Interferometer Baselines . journal A& As volume 15 , pages 417

    1974

  17. [25]

    , author Bunton, J.D

    author Hotan, A.W. , author Bunton, J.D. , author Chippendale, A.P. , author Whiting, M. , author Tuthill, J. , author Moss, V.A. , author McConnell, D. , author Amy, S.W. , author Huynh, M.T. , author Allison, J.R. , author Anderson, C.S. , author Bannister, K.W. , author Bas...

    2021

  18. [26]

    , author Hamman, J

    author Hoyer, S. , author Hamman, J. , year 2017 . title xarray: N-D labeled arrays and datasets in Python . journal Journal of Open Research Software volume 5 . :10.5334/jors.148

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    , author Lange, K

    author Hunter, D.R. , author Lange, K. , year 2004 . title A tutorial on mm algorithms . journal The American Statistician volume 58 , pages 30--37 . :10.1198/0003130042836, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1198/0003130042836 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1198/0003130042836

    2004 doi

  20. [28]

    , author MeerKAT Team , year 2016

    author Jonas , J. , author MeerKAT Team , year 2016 . title The MeerKAT Radio Telescope , in: booktitle MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA , p. pages 1 . :10.22323/1.277.0001

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    , author Bell , M.R

    author Junklewitz , H. , author Bell , M.R. , author Selig , M. , author En lin , T.A. , year 2013 . title RESOLVE: A new algorithm for aperture synthesis imaging of extended emission in radio astronomy . journal ArXiv e-prints http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.5282 arXiv:1311.5282

    2013 arXiv

  22. [30]

    , author Shishlenin, M

    author Kabanikhin, S. , author Shishlenin, M. , year 2019 . title Theory and numerical methods for solving inverse and ill-posed problems . journal Journal of Inverse and Ill-posed Problems volume 27 , pages 453--456 . :doi:10.1515/jiip-2019-5001

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    , author Perkins, S.J

    author Kenyon, J.S. , author Perkins, S.J. , author Bester, H.L. , author Smirnov, O.M. , author Russeeawon, C. , author Hugo, B.V. , year 2024 . title Africanus II. QuartiCal: calibrating radio interferometer data at scale using Numba and Dask . journal Astronomy and Computin...

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    , author Pitrou, A

    author Lam, S.K. , author Pitrou, A. , author Seibert, S. , year 2015 . title Numba: A llvm-based python jit compiler , in: booktitle Proceedings of the Second Workshop on the LLVM Compiler Infrastructure in HPC , pp. pages 1--6

    2015

  25. [33]

    , author Gommers, R

    author Lee, G.R. , author Gommers, R. , author Waselewski, F. , author Wohlfahrt, K. , author O'Leary, A. , year 2019 . title Pywavelets: A python package for wavelet analysis . journal Astronomy and Computing volume 4 , pages 1237 . :10.21105/joss.01237

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    , author Mars, M

    author Liaudat, T.I. , author Mars, M. , author Price, M.A. , author Pereyra, M. , author Betcke, M.M. , author McEwen, J.D. , year 2024 . title Scalable bayesian uncertainty quantification with data-driven priors for radio interferometric imaging . http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.0...

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    , author Wright, S.J

    author Nocedal, J. , author Wright, S.J. , year 2006 . title Numerical Optimization . edition second ed., publisher Springer , address New York, NY, USA

    2006

  28. [36]

    , author McKinley, B

    author Offringa, A.R. , author McKinley, B. , author Hurley-Walker, N. , author Briggs, F.H. , author Wayth, R.B. , author Kaplan, D.L. , author Bell, M.E. , author Feng, L. , author Neben, A.R. , author Hughes, J.D. , author Rhee, J. , author Murphy, T. , author Bhat, N.D.R. ...

    2014

  29. [37]

    , author Smirnov , O

    author Offringa , A.R. , author Smirnov , O. , year 2017 . title An optimized algorithm for multiscale wideband deconvolution of radio astronomical images . journal MNRAS volume 471 , pages 301--316 . :10.1093/mnras/stx1547, http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.06786 arXiv:1706.06786

    2017 arXiv

  30. [38]

    , author Kenyon, J.S

    author Perkins, S.J. , author Kenyon, J.S. , author Andati, L.A.L. , author Bester, H.L. , author Smirnov, O.M. , author Hugo, B.V. , year 2024 . title Africanus I. Scalable, distributed and efficient radio data processing with Dask-MS and Codex Africanus . journal Astronomy a...

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    , author Cornwell , T.J

    author Rau , U. , author Cornwell , T.J. , year 2011 . title A multi-scale multi-frequency deconvolution algorithm for synthesis imaging in radio interferometry . journal A& A volume 532 , pages A71 . :10.1051/0004-6361/201117104, http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2745 arXiv:1106.2745

    2011 arXiv

  32. [40]

    , author Birdi, J

    author Repetti, A. , author Birdi, J. , author Dabbech, A. , author Wiaux, Y. , year 2017 . title Non-convex optimization for self-calibration of direction-dependent effects in radio interferometric imaging . journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society volume 470...

    2017

  33. [41]

    , author Wiaux, Y

    author Repetti, A. , author Wiaux, Y. , year 2021 . title Variable metric forward-backward algorithm for composite minimization problems . journal SIAM Journal on Optimization volume 31 , pages 1215--1241 . :10.1137/19M1277552, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1...

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    , year 2015

    author Rocklin, M. , year 2015 . title Dask: Parallel computation with blocked algorithms and task scheduling , in: editor Huff, K. , editor Bergstra, J. (Eds.), booktitle Proceedings of the 14th Python in Science Conference , pp. pages 130 -- 136

    2015

  35. [43]

    , author Frank , P

    author Roth , J. , author Frank , P. , author Bester , H.L. , author Smirnov , O.M. , author Westermann , R. , author En lin , T.A. , year 2024 . title fast-resolve: Fast Bayesian radio interferometric imaging . journal A& A volume 690 , pages A387 . :10.1051/0004-6361/2024511...

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    , author Hamaker , J.P

    author Sault , R.J. , author Hamaker , J.P. , author Bregman , J.D. , year 1996 . title Understanding radio polarimetry. II. Instrumental calibration of an interferometer array. journal A& As volume 117 , pages 149--159

    1996

  37. [45]

    , author Dewdney, P.E

    author Schilizzi, R.T. , author Dewdney, P.E. , author Lazio, T.J.W. , year 2008 . title The square kilometre array , in: booktitle SPIE Astronomical Telescopes+ Instrumentation , organization International Society for Optics and Photonics . pp. pages 70121I--70121I

    2008

  38. [46]

    , year 2011 a

    author Smirnov , O.M. , year 2011 a. title Revisiting the radio interferometer measurement equation. I. A full-sky Jones formalism . journal A& A volume 527 , pages A106 . :10.1051/0004-6361/201016082, http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.1764 arXiv:1101.1764

    2011 arXiv

  39. [47]

    , year 2011 b

    author Smirnov , O.M. , year 2011 b. title Revisiting the radio interferometer measurement equation. II. Calibration and direction-dependent effects . journal A& A volume 527 , pages A107 . :10.1051/0004-6361/201116434, http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.1765 arXiv:1101.1765

    2011 arXiv

  40. [48]

    , author Makhathini, S

    author Smirnov, O.M. , author Makhathini, S. , author Kenyon, J.S. , author Bester, H.L. , author Perkins, S.J. , author Ramaila, A.J.T. , author Hugo, B.V. , year 2024 . title Africanus IV. The Stimela2 framework: scalable and reproducible workflows, from local to cloud compu...

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    , author Stappers , B.W

    author Smirnov , O.M. , author Stappers , B.W. , author Tasse , C. , author Bester , H.L. , author Bignall , H. , author Walker , M.A. , author Caleb , M. , author Rajwade , K.M. , author Buchner , S. , author Woudt , P. , author Ivchenko , M. , author Roth , L. , author Noord...

    2024

  42. [50]

    , author Bester, H.L

    author Sob, U.M. , author Bester, H.L. , author Smirnov, O.M. , author Kenyon, J.S. , author Russeeawon, C. , year 2021 . title Solution intervals considered harmful: on the optimality of radio interferometric gain solutions . journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical ...

    2021 doi

  43. [51]

    , author Wandelt , B.D

    author Sutter , P.M. , author Wandelt , B.D. , author McEwen , J.D. , author Bunn , E.F. , author Karakci , A. , author Korotkov , A. , author Timbie , P. , author Tucker , G.S. , author Zhang , L. , year 2014 . title Probabilistic image reconstruction for radio interferometer...

    2014 arXiv

  44. [52]

    , author Dabbech, A

    author Terris, M. , author Dabbech, A. , author Tang, C. , author Wiaux, Y. , year 2022 . title Image reconstruction algorithms in radio interferometry: From handcrafted to learned regularization denoisers . journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society volume 518 ...

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    , author Bhatnagar , S

    author THE CASA TEAM , author Bean , B. , author Bhatnagar , S. , author Castro , S. , author Donovan Meyer , J. , author Emonts , B. , author Garcia , E. , author Garwood , R. , author Golap , K. , author Gonzalez Villalba , J. , author Harris , P. , author Hayashi , Y. , aut...

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    , author Dabbech , A

    author Thouvenin , P.A. , author Dabbech , A. , author Jiang , M. , author Abdulaziz , A. , author Thiran , J.P. , author Jackson , A. , author Wiaux , Y. , year 2023 . title Parallel faceted imaging in radio interferometry via proximal splitting (Faceted HyperSARA) - II. Code...

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    , year 2015

    author van Diepen , G.N.J. , year 2015 . title Casacore Table Data System and its use in the MeasurementSet . journal Astronomy and Computing volume 12 , pages 174--180 . :10.1016/j.ascom.2015.06.002

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    , et al., year 2013

    author van Haarlem , M.P. , et al., year 2013 . title LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray . journal A&A volume 556 , pages A2 . :10.1051/0004-6361/201220873, http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3550 arXiv:1305.3550

    2013 arXiv

  49. [57]

    , author Drake, F.L

    author Van Rossum, G. , author Drake, F.L. , year 2009 . title Python 3 Reference Manual . publisher CreateSpace , address Scotts Valley, CA

    2009

  50. [58]

    , et al., year 2020

    author Virtanen, P. , et al., year 2020 . title SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python . journal Nature Methods volume 17 , pages 261--272 . :10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  51. [59]

    , author Greisen , E.W

    author Wells , D.C. , author Greisen , E.W. , author Harten , R.H. , year 1981 . title FITS - a Flexible Image Transport System . journal A&A volume 44 , pages 363

    1981

  52. [60]

    , author Dabbech , A

    author Wilber , A.G. , author Dabbech , A. , author Jackson , A. , author Wiaux , Y. , year 2023 . title Scalable precision wide-field imaging in radio interferometry: I. uSARA validated on ASKAP data . journal MNRAS volume 522 , pages 5558--5575 . :10.1093/mnras/stad1351, htt...

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    , author Gull, S.F

    author Ye, H. , author Gull, S.F. , author Tan, S.M. , author Nikolic, B. , year 2021 . title High accuracy wide-field imaging method in radio interferometry . journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society volume 510 , pages 4110–4125 . :10.1093/mnras/stab3548

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.