Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 50 references

6D Movable Antenna Enhanced Multi-Access Point Coordination via Position and Orientation Optimization

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Moving and rotating each access point's antenna in three dimensions raises weighted sum rate by roughly 30 percent over fixed antennas in simulated dense WLANs.

desk verdict Solid 6DMA multi-AP coordination paper; the math holds, but the ~30% gain rests on an idealized antenna pattern model that needs a robustness check. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10736 v1 pith:YJ5NO5T2 submitted 2024-12-14 eess.SP

Xiangyu Pi , Lipeng Zhu , Haobin Mao , Zhenyu Xiao , Xiang-Gen Xia , Rui Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords six-dimensionalmovableantenna(6DMA)multi-APcoordinationweightedsumratepositionvectororientationmatrixRiemannianmanifoldoptimizationstatisticalCSIWLAN
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that letting each coordinated access point in a Wi-Fi/WLAN network move its antenna through six degrees of freedom—three position coordinates and three orientation angles—meaningfully improves uplink capacity for many users. The authors build a channel model in which antenna position changes path phases and antenna orientation changes received power through effective aperture and polarization losses, then maximize weighted sum rate by alternating between position optimization, orientation optimization, and MMSE combining. In their simulated eight-AP network, the full scheme raises weighted sum rate from 35.3 to 45.6 bps/Hz, about 30 percent over fixed antennas, and an offline version that optimizes only on statistical channel statistics still beats fixed antennas. The point of the work is that spatial degrees of freedom normally reserved for a single base station can be distributed across access points to suppress multiuser interference and improve coverage.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the six-degree-of-freedom antenna configuration: a position vector $q_m \in \mathbb{R}^3$ confined to a local cuboid and an orientation matrix $A_m = [u_m, v_m] \in \mathbb{R}^{3\times 2}$ whose columns are orthonormal, i.e., $A_m^T A_m = I_2$, so orientations live on the Stiefel manifold. The channel model (Eqs. (5)-(8)) couples position to phase through the field-response vector $f_{k,m}(q_m)$ and orientation to amplitude through effective aperture loss $\max\{d(\psi)^T u_m, 0\}$ and polarization loss $|(e^T v_m)|^2$. The argument is carried by an alternating optimization that cycles through MMSE receive combining, SCA-based position updates with a closed-form projection, and Riemannian conjugate-gradient orientation updates with retraction to the manifold.

What would settle it

A simulation or testbed that replaces the analytic projection gain model (Eqs. (6)-(8)) with measured radiation and polarization patterns of the actual antenna would settle the claim: if real rotation changes received gain far less than the model predicts, the orientation-optimization gain and the overall 6DMA advantage over fixed antennas would shrink toward the position-only gain.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that six-dimensional movable antennas (6DMAs) at distributed access points can be jointly positioned and oriented—within small local regions—to reshape the multiuser channel in ways that fixed antennas cannot, and that this reshaping translates into higher weighted sum rate for uplink users. The paper derives a field-response channel model where each path's phase is set by antenna position and its amplitude by antenna orientation, formulates the weighted-sum-rate maximization, and solves it with an alternating algorithm that optimizes antenna position vectors via successive convex approximation, antenna orientation matrices on the Stiefel manifold via Riemannian conjugate gradient, and receive combining via the MMSE receiver. Simulations show the proposed 6DMA scheme outperforms fixed antennas, position-only and orientation-only variants, and approaches exhaustive search, with the offline statistical-CSI scheme still beating fixed antennas in both uni-polarized and dual-polarized settings.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the assumption that a small rotation of an access-point antenna produces a large, predictable change in received signal strength, as described by the effective-aperture and polarization formulas in Eqs. (6)-(8); real antennas with flatter patterns or more complex polarization behavior would yield smaller orientation gains.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With 6DMA at each coordinated AP, more users can be served on the same time-frequency resources because position and orientation can lower channel correlation between users (Figure 5).
  • The online 6DMA scheme comes close to exhaustive search in weighted sum rate while using far less search complexity, and the offline statistical-CSI scheme retains most of the gain without frequent antenna movement (Figures 5-6).
  • At a fixed weighted sum rate, the 6DMA scheme needs less transmit power per user, and the advantage over fixed antennas grows in the interference-limited high-SNR regime (Figure 7).
  • When channel-state information is imperfect, the offline-designed positions and orientations remain effective, and the gap between online and offline schemes narrows (Figure 8).
  • Dual-polarized 6DMA achieves rates comparable to uni-polarized with half the number of APs, reducing deployment and movement overhead (Figure 9).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is downlink: the same position-orientation optimization could shape broadcast channels and interference, but phase-coherent transmission across distributed APs would require synchronization and channel feedback that the paper does not address.
  • The projected-rate gains depend on antennas whose gain changes strongly with orientation; if deployed 6DMA elements use broad-beam or omnidirectional patterns, the orientation component of the gain would shrink while the position component remains.
  • The offline statistical-CSI scheme suggests a two-timescale deployment: antennas move only when user distribution or large-scale environment changes, leaving fast fading to receive combining; this could be tested in a real WLAN testbed with motor-driven antennas.
  • Combining 6DMA with CSMA/CA scheduling might convert physical-layer rate gains into airtime improvements only if coordination overhead and antenna movement time are counted; the paper's rates assume cooperative centralized reception.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a six-dimensional movable antenna (6DMA) enhanced multi-access-point (multi-AP) coordination system for uplink weighted sum rate (WSR) maximization in WLAN scenarios. The authors model each AP's channel as a function of both the antenna position, through a position-dependent phase in a field-response representation, and the antenna orientation, through effective aperture and polarization losses. The resulting non-convex optimization over antenna positions, orientations, and receive combining is addressed by an alternating optimization (AO) framework: successive convex approximation (SCA) for positions, Riemannian manifold optimization over the Stiefel manifold for orientations, and MMSE combining. An offline statistical-CSI variant and a dual-polarized extension are also provided. Simulations show convergence of the algorithm and report substantial WSR gains over fixed-antenna (FA) baselines, with the offline scheme retaining a large portion of the gain.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a useful contribution to the growing 6DMA literature by moving from centralized base-station setups to distributed multi-AP coordination, which is relevant to Wi-Fi 7 multi-AP features. The derivation is careful and mostly internally consistent: the MM surrogate in (23), the SCA quadratic lower bound in (25), and the Stiefel-manifold retraction in (38) are standard and appear correctly applied. The paper also provides a convergence argument, complexity estimates, an offline statistical-CSI design, and an extension to dual-polarized antennas, which broaden its practical scope. The simulation setup is fully specified in Table I with no free parameters fitted to experimental data, so the reported gains are reproducible from the model. The main weakness is that the orientation-dependent gains, which are the source of the claimed orientation-optimization benefit, rely entirely on an idealized radiation-pattern model that is not tested for robustness.

major comments (3)
  1. [II-B, Eqs. (6)-(8)] The orientation-dependent gain model is load-bearing for the claimed performance gains. The effective aperture loss max{d(\psi)^T u_m, 0} and the polarization loss |(e_{k,m}^l)^T v_m|^2 assume an ideal aperture with no backlobes and perfect polarization matching. Since the same model generates the channels seen by the optimizer and the channels in the FA baseline, the simulation is internally consistent but not externally validated. Footnote 1 states that the framework can handle arbitrary radiation patterns, which makes the absence of any sensitivity analysis in Section IV more conspicuous. Please add a robustness study with at least one alternative pattern model (e.g., a cos^q pattern with finite front-to-back ratio and cross-polarization discrimination) to show that the WSR gains and the optimized orientations do not hinge on the half-space cosine model.
  2. [III-D, Eq. (34)] The Riemannian gradient used in Algorithm 2 relies on the Jacobian \nabla_A Q, which is specified only through the limiting definition in (34). No closed-form expression or concrete finite-difference procedure is given, so the algorithm is under-specified and the stated O(N_max K L_max) complexity for the orientation update cannot be verified from the text. Please provide an analytic gradient or a precise numerical differentiation scheme, and adjust the complexity analysis accordingly.
  3. [III-E, Eq. (39)] The displayed convergence inequality does not match the update order of Algorithm 3. In the algorithm, the receive combining matrix and auxiliary variables are updated in lines 8-9 after the position block and before the orientation block, so the term R(q_t, A_t, W_{t-1}) in (b) is not the value produced by the orientation optimization. The monotonicity conclusion is still recoverable by inserting an intermediate MMSE-update inequality, but the chain in (39) should be corrected or the algorithm description should be changed to match the proof.
minor comments (5)
  1. [IV-B] The sentence reporting an increase from 35.3 to 45.6 bps/Hz and calling this a "30% performance improvement" compares the converged 6DMA scheme with its own random initialization, not with the FA baseline; the text should clarify this distinction to avoid conflating convergence gain with the FA-relative gains shown in Figures 5-7.
  2. [IV-C] The scheme labeled "ES" is not an exhaustive search; the text explains that exhaustive search is prohibitively complex and an "alternating selection method" is used instead. The label and the statements that the proposed scheme "approaches the performance of the ES scheme" should be revised to avoid implying comparison with a global optimum.
  3. [Eq. (28)] In the projection function, "[q]^{max}_u" appears twice for the lower and upper bounds; the first occurrence should be "[q]^{min}_u".
  4. [III-D and III-E] There are several typographical errors: "Ploack-Ribiere" should be "Polak-Ribière", "Riemanian" should be "Riemannian", "multiuer" in Section I should be "multiuser", "surpassess" in the discussion of Fig. 7 should be "surpasses", and the Fig. 4 caption should read "Algorithm 3", not "Algorithms 3".
  5. [Eq. (41)] The symbol L is used both for the number of channel paths and for the Monte Carlo realization set; please use a different symbol for one of these to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the WSR gains are simulated from an explicitly defined channel model against fixed-antenna benchmarks; the self-citations are methodological and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claim is a weighted-sum-rate gain from jointly optimizing 6DMA positions and orientations in a simulated multi-AP WLAN. The derivation chain is self-contained: the channel in Eq. (5) is built from the field-response model of Eqs. (3)-(4) plus the antenna-gain model of Eqs. (6)-(8), which is explicitly stated from the Friis formula, not fitted to data. The optimization algorithms (SCA for positions, Riemannian manifold optimization for orientations, MMSE combining) are derived in the paper with gradients and Hessians in Appendix A, and the benchmarks (FA, 6DMA-position, 6DMA-orientation, ES) are defined independently from the proposed scheme. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then renamed as a prediction; the offline-6DMA scheme optimizes on statistical CSI and is evaluated on the same channel distribution, which is standard simulation practice rather than circularity. The paper does cite prior works by overlapping authors, notably [20], [22] for the field-response channel model and [29] for the offline technique, but these citations are not used to force the present conclusion or to forbid alternatives; the electromagnetic gain model itself is presented with its own equations. The load-bearing assumption is the idealized radiation/polarization model: Eq. (7) sets back-lobe aperture loss to zero and Eq. (8) uses a perfect polarization-projection loss. Footnote 1 claims the framework can handle arbitrary radiation patterns, but no sensitivity analysis is run for Eqs. (6)-(8). This is a correctness/robustness risk, not a circularity: the simulation is internally consistent but externally unvalidated. The claimed ~30% improvement is contingent on that model, but that contingency is not a reduction of the derivation to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the movable-antenna field-response channel model and a simplified directional-gain model. No new physical entities are introduced. The main unverified premise is the antenna gain formula.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Far-field propagation and fixed AoAs for each path across the antenna movement region.
    Section II-B states 'the far-field condition between each AP and each UT is assumed to be guaranteed', so each path's AoA is fixed and only the phase changes with position.
  • domain assumption Field-response channel model: h_{k,m}(q,A) = f^H(q) G(A) a, where a is the path-response vector that is independent of antenna position and orientation.
    Adopted from refs [20],[22] and used throughout the optimization; it underlies both position and orientation optimization.
  • domain assumption Antenna gain model in Eqs. (6)-(8): effective aperture loss is the projection max{d^T u, 0} and polarization loss is |e^T v|^2.
    This model defines how orientation affects channel amplitude; it is not validated by measurements and is central to the orientation optimization.
  • domain assumption Perfect instantaneous CSI (AoAs, PRVs, polarization vectors) is available in the online algorithm.
    Algorithm 3 takes {theta}, {phi}, {e}, {a} as inputs; the paper does not model channel estimation overhead or errors except in Figure 8.
  • domain assumption Centralized processing: all APs are connected to a CPU via fronthaul for joint combining.
    Section II assumes all APs forward signals to a central CPU, which is the basis for the MMSE receiver and global WSR objective.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 6D Movable Antenna Enhanced Multi-Access Point Coordination via Position and Orientation Optimization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YJ5NO5T2

@misc{pith2026241210736,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 6D Movable Antenna Enhanced Multi-Access Point Coordination via Position and Orientation Optimization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YJ5NO5T2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10736}
}
read the original abstract

The effective utilization of unlicensed spectrum is regarded as an important direction to enable the massive access and broad coverage for next-generation wireless local area network (WLAN). Due to the crowded spectrum occupancy and dense user terminals (UTs), the conventional fixed antenna (FA)-based access points (APs) face huge challenges in realizing massive access and interference cancellation. To address this issue, in this paper we develop a six-dimensional movable antenna (6DMA) enhanced multi-AP coordination system for coverage enhancement and interference mitigation. First, we model the wireless channels between the APs and UTs to characterize their variation with respect to 6DMA movement, in terms of both the three-dimensional (3D) position and 3D orientation of each distributed AP's antenna. Then, an optimization problem is formulated to maximize the weighted sum rate of multiple UTs for their uplink transmissions by jointly optimizing the antenna position vector (APV), the antenna orientation matrix (AOM), and the receive combining matrix over all coordinated APs, subject to the constraints on local antenna movement regions. To solve this challenging non-convex optimization problem, we first transform it into a more tractable Lagrangian dual problem. Then, an alternating optimization (AO)-based algorithm is developed by iteratively optimizing the APV and AOM, which are designed by applying the successive convex approximation (SCA) technique and Riemannian manifold optimization-based algorithm, respectively. Simulation results show that the proposed 6DMA-enhanced multi-AP coordination system can significantly enhance network capacity, and both of the online and offline 6DMA schemes can attain considerable performance improvement compared to the conventional FA-based schemes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10736 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the proposed 6DMA-enhanced multi-AP coordination [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Geographical distribution of APs and UTs in GCCS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Comparison of the WSR between the proposed and benchmark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Convergence performance of Algorithms 3. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of the WSR between the proposed and benchmark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the WSR between the proposed and benchmark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    5G new radio unlicensed: Challenges and evaluation,

    M. Hirzallah, M. Krunz, B. Kecicioglu, and B. Hamzeh, “5G new radio unlicensed: Challenges and evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Cognit. Commun. Netw., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 689–701, Sep. 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Intelligent access to unlicensed spectrum: A mean field based deep reinforcement learning approach,

    E. Pei, Y . Huang, L. Zhang, Y . Li, and J. Zhang, “Intelligent access to unlicensed spectrum: A mean field based deep reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2325– 2337, Apr. 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    San Jose, CA, USA, Cisco

    Cisco annual internet report (2018-2023) white paper. San Jose, CA, USA, Cisco. White Paper, 2020. [Online]. Available: https: //www.cisco.com

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    IEEE 802.11be extremely high throughput: The next generation of Wi-Fi technology beyond 802.11ax,

    D. Lopez-Perez, A. Garcia-Rodriguez, L. Galati-Giordano, M. Kasslin, and K. Doppler, “IEEE 802.11be extremely high throughput: The next generation of Wi-Fi technology beyond 802.11ax,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 113–119, Sep. 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    What will Wi-Fi 8 be? a primer on IEEE 802.11bn ultra high reliability,

    L. Galati-Giordano, G. Geraci, M. Carrascosa, and B. Bellalta, “What will Wi-Fi 8 be? a primer on IEEE 802.11bn ultra high reliability,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 126–132, Aug. 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    A survey on high efficiency wireless local area networks: Next generation WiFi,

    H. A. Omar, K. Abboud, N. Cheng, K. R. Malekshan, A. T. Gamage, and W. Zhuang, “A survey on high efficiency wireless local area networks: Next generation WiFi,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2315–2344, 4th Quart. 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    An introduction to online video game QoS and QoE influencing factors,

    F. Metzger, S. Geißler, A. Grigorjew, F. Loh, C. Moldovan, M. Seufert, and T. Hoßfeld, “An introduction to online video game QoS and QoE influencing factors,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1894–1925, 3rd Quart. 2022

    work page 1925

  8. [8]

    IEEE 802.11be Wi-Fi 7: New challenges and opportunities,

    C. Deng, X. Fang, X. Han, X. Wang, L. Yan, R. He, Y . Long, and Y . Guo, “IEEE 802.11be Wi-Fi 7: New challenges and opportunities,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2136–2166, 4th Quart. 2020

    work page 2020

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Current status and directions of IEEE 802.11be, the future Wi-Fi 7,

    E. Khorov, I. Levitsky, and I. F. Akyildiz, “Current status and directions of IEEE 802.11be, the future Wi-Fi 7,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 88 664– 88 688, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Doostnejad, Discussion on Multi-AP Coordination Type

    R. Doostnejad, Discussion on Multi-AP Coordination Type . document IEEE 802.11, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Jan. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/documents?is dcn=0104&is group=00be

    2019

  3. [11]

    Ryu, Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination for EHT

    K. Ryu, Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination for EHT . document IEEE 802.11, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Jan. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/documents?is dcn=1982&is group=0eht

    2019

  4. [12]

    A critical analysis of research potential, challenges, and future direc- tives in industrial wireless sensor networks,

    M. Raza, N. Aslam, H. Le-Minh, S. Hussain, Y . Cao, and N. M. Khan, “A critical analysis of research potential, challenges, and future direc- tives in industrial wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 39–95, 1st Quart. 2018

    2018

  5. [13]

    A survey on multi-AP coordination approaches over emerging WLANs: Future directions and open challenges,

    S. Verma, T. K. Rodrigues, Y . Kawamoto, M. M. Fouda, and N. Kato, “A survey on multi-AP coordination approaches over emerging WLANs: Future directions and open challenges,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 858–889, 2nd Quart. 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Historical review of fluid antenna and movable antenna,

    L. Zhu and K.-K. Wong, “Historical review of fluid antenna and movable antenna,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02362 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable antennas for wireless commu- nication: Opportunities and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, Jun. 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Movable antenna-enhanced wireless communications: General architec- tures and implementation methods,

    B. Ning, S. Yang, Y . Wu, P. Wang, W. Mei, C. Yuen, and E. Bj ¨ornson, “Movable antenna-enhanced wireless communications: General architec- tures and implementation methods,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15448 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Performance limits of fluid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Performance limits of fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2469–2472, Nov. 2020

    2020

  10. [18]

    Fluid antenna system: New insights on outage probability and diversity gain,

    W. K. New, K.-K. Wong, H. Xu, K.-F. Tong, and C.-B. Chae, “Fluid antenna system: New insights on outage probability and diversity gain,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 128–140, Jan. 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Revisiting outage probability analysis for two-user fluid antenna multiple access system,

    H. Xu, K.-K. Wong, W. K. New, K.-F. Tong, Y . Zhang, and C.-B. Chae, “Revisiting outage probability analysis for two-user fluid antenna multiple access system,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 9534–9548, Aug. 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234–6250, Jun. 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Performance analysis and optimization for movable antenna aided wideband communi- cations,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, Z. Xiao, and R. Zhang, “Performance analysis and optimization for movable antenna aided wideband communi- cations,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , 2024, early access, doi: 10.1109/TWC.2024.3471698

    2024

  14. [22]

    MIMO capacity characterization for movable antenna systems,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “MIMO capacity characterization for movable antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3392–3407, Apr. 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Joint beamforming and antenna movement design for moveable antenna systems based on statistical CSI,

    X. Chen, B. Feng, Y . Wu, D. W. Kwan Ng, and R. Schober, “Joint beamforming and antenna movement design for moveable antenna systems based on statistical CSI,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2023, pp. 4387–4392

    2023

  16. [24]

    Movable-antenna enhanced multiuser communication via antenna position optimization,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, B. Ning, and R. Zhang, “Movable-antenna enhanced multiuser communication via antenna position optimization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7214–7229, Jul. 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Multiuser commu- nications with movable-antenna base station: Joint antenna positioning, receive combining, and power control,

    Z. Xiao, X. Pi, L. Zhu, X.-G. Xia, and R. Zhang, “Multiuser commu- nications with movable-antenna base station: Joint antenna positioning, receive combining, and power control,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 2024, early access, doi: 10.1109/2024.3486320

    2024

  18. [26]

    Dynamic beam coverage for satellite communications aided by movable-antenna array,

    L. Zhu, X. Pi, W. Ma, Z. Xiao, and R. Zhang, “Dynamic beam coverage for satellite communications aided by movable-antenna array,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15643, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Compressed sensing based channel estimation for movable antenna communications,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “Compressed sensing based channel estimation for movable antenna communications,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2747–2751, Oct. 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Channel estimation for movable antenna communication systems: A framework based on compressed sensing,

    Z. Xiao, S. Cao, L. Zhu, Y . Liu, B. Ning, X.-G. Xia, and R. Zhang, “Channel estimation for movable antenna communication systems: A framework based on compressed sensing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11 814–11 830, Sep. 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    6D movable antenna based on user distribution: Modeling and optimization,

    X. Shao, Q. Jiang, and R. Zhang, “6D movable antenna based on user distribution: Modeling and optimization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., early access, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    6D movable antenna en- hanced wireless network via discrete position and rotation optimization,

    X. Shao, R. Zhang, Q. Jiang, and R. Schober, “6D movable antenna en- hanced wireless network via discrete position and rotation optimization,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. , early access, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    6DMA enhanced wireless network with flexible antenna position and rotation: Opportunities and challenges,

    X. Shao and R. Zhang, “6DMA enhanced wireless network with flexible antenna position and rotation: Opportunities and challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06064, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Distributed channel estimation for 6D movable antenna: Unveiling directional sparsity,

    X. Shao, R. Zhang, Q. Jiang, J. Park, T. Q. S. Quek, and R. Schober, “Distributed channel estimation for 6D movable antenna: Unveiling directional sparsity,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16510 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Exploiting six-dimensional mov- able antenna for wireless sensing,

    X. Shao, R. Zhang, and R. Schober, “Exploiting six-dimensional mov- able antenna for wireless sensing,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., 2024, early access

    2024

  26. [34]

    Capacity maximization for base station with hybrid fixed and movable antennas,

    X. Shi, X. Shao, and R. Zhang, “Capacity maximization for base station with hybrid fixed and movable antennas,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2877–2881, Oct. 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Secure wireless communication via movable-antenna array,

    G. Hu, Q. Wu, K. Xu, J. Si, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Secure wireless communication via movable-antenna array,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett. , vol. 31, pp. 516–520, 2024

    2024

  28. [36]

    In- telligent reflecting surface-aided wireless communication with movable elements,

    G. Hu, Q. Wu, D. Xu, K. Xu, J. Si, Y . Cai, and N. Al-Dhahir, “In- telligent reflecting surface-aided wireless communication with movable elements,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1173–1177, Apr. 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    UA V-enabled wireless networks with movable-antenna array: Flexible beamforming and trajectory design,

    W. Liu, X. Zhang, H. Xing, J. Ren, Y . Shen, and S. Cui, “UA V-enabled wireless networks with movable-antenna array: Flexible beamforming and trajectory design,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., 2024, early access, doi: 10.1109/LWC.2024.3451246

    2024

  30. [38]

    Cram ´er-rao bound minimization for movable antenna-assisted multiuser integrated sensing and communications,

    H. Qin, W. Chen, Q. Wu, Z. Zhang, Z. Li, and N. Cheng, “Cram ´er-rao bound minimization for movable antenna-assisted multiuser integrated sensing and communications,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., 2024, early access, doi: 10.1109/LWC.2024.3468709

    2024

  31. [39]

    Over-the-air computation via 2D movable antenna array,

    N. Li, P. Wu, B. Ning, L. Zhu, and W. Mei, “Over-the-air computation via 2D movable antenna array,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , 2024, early access, doi: 10.1109/LWC.2024.3485513

    2024

  32. [40]

    C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design . Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2015

    2015

  33. [41]

    Near- field communications: A tutorial review,

    Y . Liu, Z. Wang, J. Xu, C. Ouyang, X. Mu, and R. Schober, “Near- field communications: A tutorial review,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. , vol. 4, pp. 1999–2049, 2023

    1999

  34. [42]

    Scalable Cell-Free massive MIMO systems,

    E. Bj ¨ornson and L. Sanguinetti, “Scalable Cell-Free massive MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4247–4261, Jul. 2020

    2020

  35. [43]

    Fractional programming for communication systems—Part I: Power control and beamforming,

    K. Shen and W. Yu, “Fractional programming for communication systems—Part I: Power control and beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2616–2630, May 2018

    2018

  36. [44]

    Goldsmith, Wireless Communications

    A. Goldsmith, Wireless Communications. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007

    2007

  37. [45]

    Majorization-minimization algo- rithms in signal processing, communications, and machine learning,

    Y . Sun, P. Babu, and D. P. Palomar, “Majorization-minimization algo- rithms in signal processing, communications, and machine learning,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. , vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 794–816, Feb. 2017

    2017

  38. [46]

    Nesterov, Lectures on Convex Optimization

    Y . Nesterov, Lectures on Convex Optimization . Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2018

    2018

  39. [47]

    Boumal, An Introduction to Optimization on Smooth Manifolds

    N. Boumal, An Introduction to Optimization on Smooth Manifolds . Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, Aug. 2020

    2020

  40. [48]

    Sato, Riemannian Optimization and Its Applications

    H. Sato, Riemannian Optimization and Its Applications . Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    D. P. Bertsekas, Nonlinear Programming. Belmont, MA, USA: Athena Scientific, 1999

    1999

  42. [50]

    C. P. Robert and G. Casella, Monte Carlo Statistical Methods . NewYork: Springer-Verlag, 1999

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.